DOCSLIB.ORG

Wylfa Decision Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wylfa Decision Report 1 The decision on the application to carry out a decommissioning project at Wylfa nuclear power station under the Nuclear Reactors (Environmental Impact Assessment for Decommissioning) Regulations 1999 (as amended) A report prepared by the Office for Nuclear Regulation 2 © Crown copyright This publication may be freely reproduced, except for advertising, endorsement or commercial purposes. First published November 2013. Please acknowledge the source as the Office for Nuclear Regulation. Published by the Office for Nuclear Regulation October 2013 Further copies are available from: Office for Nuclear Regulation EIADR Team Redgrave Court Merton Road Bootle Merseyside L20 7HS E-mail: [email protected] Available on the internet from: www.hse.gov.uk/nuclear/ 3 Contents Page FOREWORD .................................................................................................... 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................... 10 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 12 Application for consent to carry out a decommissioning project ........... 13 Organisations involved in the consultation process ............................... 15 Request for evidence to verify information within the environmental statement ...................................................................................................... 15 Review of the Environmental Statement ................................................... 16 Introduction .................................................................................................. 16 Changes in Decommissioning Strategy since 2008 ................................. 16 Review of the environmental impact of the decommissioning project .. 16 Air quality and climatic factors ................................................................... 18 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 18 Consultation Comments .............................................................................. 18 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 19 Archaeology and cultural heritage ............................................................. 20 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 20 Consultation Comments .............................................................................. 21 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 21 Ecology ......................................................................................................... 22 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 22 Consultation Comments .............................................................................. 23 Conclusion.................................................................................................... 25 Geology, hydrogeology and soils .............................................................. 26 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 26 4 Consultation Comments .............................................................................. 27 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 27 Landscape and visual .................................................................................. 28 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 28 Consultation Comments .............................................................................. 29 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 29 Noise and vibration ...................................................................................... 30 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 30 Consultation Comments .............................................................................. 31 Conclusion.................................................................................................... 31 Socio - economic ......................................................................................... 32 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 32 Consultation Comments.............................................................................. 34 Conclusion.................................................................................................... 35 Surface water quality, drainage & discharges .......................................... 36 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 36 Consultation Comments.............................................................................. 37 Conclusion.................................................................................................... 38 Traffic and transport .................................................................................... 39 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 39 Consultation Comments.............................................................................. 40 Conclusion.................................................................................................... 41 Cumulative Impacts ..................................................................................... 42 Consultation Comments.............................................................................. 43 Conclusion.................................................................................................... 44 Residual impacts.......................................................................................... 45 ONR Review .................................................................................................. 45 5 Consultation Comments .............................................................................. 46 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 46 Legislation Update ....................................................................................... 47 Effects on other European Economic States ............................................ 47 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 48 Legislative framework for nuclear safety .................................................. 50 Nuclear Installations Act 1965 .................................................................... 50 Other legislation dealing with nuclear and radiological hazards ............ 50 Effects of decommissioning on other countries....................................... 51 Regulators and others working together ................................................... 51 Legislative process under EIADR .............................................................. 51 Application for consent to carry out a decommissioning project........... 51 Public consultation on an environmental statement ................................ 52 Public consultation on further information ............................................... 53 Evidence to verify information in the environmental statement ............. 53 Change or extension to a decommissioning project................................ 53 Granting consent and attaching conditions .............................................. 53 Transparency of ONR’s decision on an application ................................. 53 Annex 2 ......................................................................................................... 55 Consultation on the environmental statement .......................................... 55 Statutory Consultation Bodies ................................................................... 55 Non-Statutory Consultation Bodies ........................................................... 55 Annex 3 ......................................................................................................... 58 Consultees who responded on the environmental statement ................. 58 Annex 4 ......................................................................................................... 59 Summary of environmental benefits and detriments and mitigation measures ...................................................................................................... 59 6 Annex 5 ......................................................................................................... 69 Reasons for topics not pursued for evidence or further information ..... 69 Light pollution .............................................................................................. 73 Removal/demolition of offshore structures ............................................... 73 Socio economic ............................................................................................ 74 Topics not pursued for evidence or further information – topics raised by consultees (2008 & 2013ES) .................................................................. 74 Issues covered elsewhere – town and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download a Copy
    Cover image: Courtesey of EDF Energy — www.edfenergy.com/energy CONTENTS... 1 AT A GLANCE... 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY... 4 BENEFITS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY... 5 WHAT THE PUBLIC THINK... 6 HOW NUCLEAR CREATES ENERGY... 7 HOW A REACTOR WORKS... 8 THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE... 9 MANAGING WASTE... 10 RADIATION EXPLAINED... 12 NUCLEAR AROUND THE WORLD... 14 UK NUCLEAR SITES... 16 NUCLEAR NEW BUILD... 17 NEW BUILD IN NUMBERS... 18 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE... 19 DECOMMISSIONING... 20 CAREERS IN NUCLEAR... 21 FUTHER INFORMATION... AT A GLANCE... Nuclear is a major part of our energy mix. Today it accounts for 21% of electricity generated in the UK and has been providing secure low carbon electricity for over 60 years. Low carbon energy, including There are 15 nuclear power and renewables, nuclear power account for almost 51% of the reactors operating UK’s generation electricity mix across eight sites in the UK In 2016 nuclear energy avoided 22.7 million metric tonnes of CO2 emissions in the UK BEIS,Digest of UK Energy Statistics 2018 That’s equivalent to taking around a third of all cars in the UK off the road Civil nuclear contributes over £6 billion to the jobs in the UK civil nuclear sector UK economy as much as aerospace manufacturing 12,159 Women in civil nuclear 1,981 People on apprenticeships Three quarters of the public 914 believe nuclear should be part People on graduate schemes of the clean energy mix Jobs Map figures generated from participating NIA members 1 This simple timeline charts some of the key people, events and legislation A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY..
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Extend and Reclassify Ynys Feurig, Cemlyn Bay and the Skerries Special Protection Area and Rename It As
    Proposal to extend and reclassify Ynys Feurig, Cemlyn Bay and The Skerries Special Protection Area and rename it as ANGLESEY TERNS / MORWENOLIAID YNYS MÔN SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA Advice to the Welsh Government NATURAL RESOURCES WALES June 2015 CONTENTS CRYNODEB 4 SUMMARY 6 1. Introduction and background 8 1.1 Legal framework 8 1.2 The 2001 Review 9 1.3 Proposed foraging extensions to tern SPAs 9 1.4 Proposed change of name 10 2. The Extant Ynys Feurig, Cemlyn Bay and The Skerries SPA 10 3. Proposed changes arising from the 2001 SPA review 11 4. Proposed foraging extension 12 4.1 Rationale 12 4.2 Data collection 13 4.3 Data analysis and modelling 16 4.4 Developing a site boundary 20 5. Recommended extended boundary for the SPA 21 6. References 25 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of qualifying ornithological interest in Anglesey Terns / Morwenoliaid Ynys Môn draft SPA. Table 2. Comparison of the extant Ynys Feurig, Cemlyn Bay and The Skerries SPA with the 2001 SPA review site account. Table 3. Models and environmental covariates used for each species/location for Ynys Feurig, Cemlyn Bay and The Skerries SPA. Table 4. Coordinates of proposed new boundary for Anglesey Terns / Morwenoliaid Ynys Môn draft SPA. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of Ynys Feurig (3), Cemlyn Bay (1) and The Skerries (2) SPA. Figure 2. Map showing tern colony SPAs and the relevant tern species used in the analysis (A=Arctic tern, C = common tern, S = sandwich tern and R = roseate tern). Figure 3. Sandwich tern tracks from the Cemlyn Bay colony.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Wylfa Newydd Project Pre-Application Consultation Stage Two A4 (Portrait) MCD Main Consultation Document.Indd 1
    ENERGY WORKING FOR BRITAIN FOR WORKING ENERGY Wylfa Newydd Project Pre-Application Consultation Stage Two STAGE 2 Main Consultation Document A4 (portrait) MCD Main Consultation Document.indd 1 18/08/2016 11:37 Main Consultation Document Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 3 About Horizon Nuclear Power Wylfa Limited ................................................................................... 3 Planning Policy Context Overview ................................................................................................... 4 The Wylfa Newydd Project ............................................................................................................... 6 Stage Two Pre-Application Consultation materials ......................................................................... 7 Accessing the Stage Two Pre-Application Consultation materials................................................ 11 Approach to consultation ............................................................................................................... 12 The approach to consultation and engagement ............................................................................ 15 Consenting Strategy for the Wylfa Newydd Project ...................................................................... 20 How this document is structured ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Paper 11: North Anglesey
    Topic Paper 11: North Anglesey Prepared in support of the Wylfa Newydd Project: Supplementary Planning Guidance Topic Paper 11: North Anglesey Page 2 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Purpose of this Topic Paper 3 1.2 Context 4 1.3 North Anglesey Overview 7 1.4 Structure of this Topic Paper 8 2 Policy Context 9 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 International/European Plans and Programmes 9 2.3 UK Plans and Programmes 9 2.4 National (Wales), Legislation, Plans and Programmes 11 2.5 Regional and Sub-Regional Plans and Programmes 16 2.6 Local Plans and Programmes 17 2.7 Key Policy Messages for the Wylfa Newydd SPG 24 3 Baseline Information and Future Trends 26 3.1 Introduction 26 3.2 Baseline Information 26 3.3 Future Trends 47 3.4 Key Issues for the Wylfa Newydd SPG 48 4 Challenges and Opportunities 50 4.1 Introduction 50 4.2 SWOT Analysis 50 4.3 Summary of Key Matters to be addressed by the SPG 52 4.4 How Should the Wylfa Newydd SPG Respond? 52 Topic Paper 11: North Anglesey Page 3 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Topic Paper 1.1.1 The purpose of this topic paper is to bring together the evidence base and policy context in relation to the communities and environment of North Anglesey to inform the updating of the Wylfa Newydd Supplementary Planning Guidance (Wylfa Newydd SPG). It is one of 11 topic papers that have been prepared to support the: Identification of the key matters to be considered in drafting the revised SPG; Provision of guidance with respect to how the revised SPG could respond to the challenges and opportunities identified; and Offer further information to the public in support of consultation on a draft revised SPG.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Isanaturallyoccurring,Verydense,Metallic Definition Andcharacteristics Deposits Definition, Mineralogyand Proportion Ofu-235Tobetween 3And5percent
    Uranium March 2010 Definition, mineralogy and Symbol U nt deposits Atomic number 92 opme vel Definition and characteristics Atomic weight 238.03 de l Uranium is a naturally occurring, very dense, metallic 3 ra Density at 298 K 19 050 kg/m UK element with an average abundance in the Earth’s crust ne mi of about 3 ppm (parts per million). It forms large, highly Melting point 1132 °C e bl charged ions and does not easily fit into the crystal struc- Boiling point 3927 °C na ai ture of common silicate minerals such as feldspar or mica. st Accordingly, as an incompatible element, it is amongst the Mineral Hardness 6 Moh’s scale su r last elements to crystallise from cooling magmas and one -8 f o Electrical resistivity 28 x 10 Ohm m re of the first to enter the liquid on melting. nt Table 1 Selected properties of uranium. Ce Minerals Under oxidizing conditions uranium exists in a highly soluble form, U6+ (an ion with a positive charge of 6), and is therefore very mobile. However, under reducing conditions Other physical properties are summarised in Table 1. it converts to an insoluble form, U4+, and is precipitated. It is these characteristics that often result in concentrations Mineralogy of uranium that are sufficient for economic extraction. Uranium is known to occur in over 200 different minerals, but most of these do not occur in deposits of sufficient Uranium is naturally radioactive. It spontaneously decays grade to warrant economic extraction. The most common through a long series of alpha and beta particle emissions, uranium-bearing minerals found in workable deposits are ultimately forming the stable element lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement of Radioactive Material Sellafield Site
    Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials PATRAM 2016 September 18-23, 2016, Kobe, Japan Paper No. 3034 Movement of Radioactive Material Sellafield Site Maz Hussain Sellafield Ltd., United Kingdom. Abstract Background The UK nuclear decommissioning priority is to reduce risk and hazard and to deliver the clean-up mission cost effectively. This is particularly relevant at Sellafield where the Legacy Ponds and Silos pose the most significant challenges. The availability of safe packaging for the movement and storage on the Sellafield site is a key enabler to meet the NDA mission for safe interim storage ahead of its subsequent treatment, packaging and final storage to a Geologic Disposal Facility (GDF). There are a significant number of packages and package design types operating on the Sellafield site. Some packages are licensed to the IAEA regulations for safe transport and others comply only with the Sellafield site specific requirements. Introduction Packages to and from the Sellafield site need to comply with the IAEA regulations for safe transport and must meet the Sellafield site requirements. However, the IAEA regulations do not apply to packages within a licensed site. For on-site safe package operations compliance is required against Sellafield site specific procedures, standards and guidance. Package Management System There are a significant number and types of package transfers routinely undertaken safely on the Sellafield site. The packages range from small (18Kg) hand held sample castles to large complex (100Te) packages some with in-built gamma gates, mechanical interlocks and hoisting drive mechanisms. The Sellafield Package Management System (SPMS) efficiently manages package operations and includes for asset register, package tracking, operational history and maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Energy, Environment & Transport Forum Policy Conference
    Westminster Energy, Environment & Transport Forum policy conference Next steps for developing the UK nuclear sector - regulation and finance, delivering new builds, and priorities for innovation, collaboration and skills Timing: Morning, Tuesday, 20th October 2020 ***Taking Place Online*** Draft agenda subject to change 8.30 Registration 9.00 Chair’s opening remarks Lord Ravensdale 9.05 The future for regulating the UK nuclear sector and ensuring regulation is agile, fit for purpose, and harmonised with international standards Mike Finnerty, Deputy Chief Nuclear Inspector and New Reactors Director, Office for Nuclear Regulation Questions and comments from the floor 9.35 Break 9.40 Case study: designing a stable funding and development model for nuclear projects in the UK, and latest progress on the Hinkley Point C project Humphrey Cadoux-Hudson, Managing Director, Nuclear Development, EDF Energy 9.55 Priorities for progressing nuclear new builds and establishing project reliability, stability, and reduced investment risk Alan Raymant, Chief Executive, Bradwell B Project, CGN Patrick Robinson, Partner, Burges Salmon Vanja Munerati, Transaction Director, Business and Investor Advisory, Arup Professor Lenny Koh, Director, Centre for Energy, Environment and Sustainability, University of Sheffield, and Head of Communication, Partnership and Internationalization, The University of Sheffield Energy Institute Questions and comments from the floor with Humphrey Cadoux-Hudson, Managing Director, Nuclear Development, EDF Energy 10.55 Chair’s closing
    [Show full text]
  • Onr Corporate Plan 2017/18 En Route to 2020
    ONR CORPORATE PLAN 2017/18 EN ROUTE TO 2020 Office for Nuclear Regulation Corporate Plan 2017/18 Financial year 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraphs 23 and 25(3) of Schedule 7 to the Energy Act 2013 July 2017 © ONR copyright 2017 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as ONR copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications Print ISBN 9781474145695 Web ISBN 9781474145701 ID P002881793 06/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK for Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office CONTENTS 1. Foreword .........................................................................................................1 2. About this plan ..............................................................................................3 3. Our Operating Environment .........................................................................9 4. Our Strategic Themes and Key Activities ....................................................15 Influencing improvements
    [Show full text]
  • IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Managing the Financial Risk Associated with Financing of New Nuclear Power Plant Projects No
    IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Managing the Financial Risk Associated with the Financing of New Nuclear Power Plant Projects Power Managing the Financial Risk Associated with Financing of New Nuclear No. NG-T-4.6 Basic Managing the Principles Financial Risk Associated with Objectives the Financing of New Nuclear Power Guides Plant Projects Technical Reports @ IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES PUBLICATIONS STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES Under the terms of Articles III.A and VIII.C of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on the peaceful uses of atomic energy. The publications in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series provide information in the areas of nuclear power, nuclear fuel cycle, radioactive waste management and decommissioning, and on general issues that are relevant to all of the above mentioned areas. The structure of the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises three levels: 1 — Basic Principles and Objectives; 2 — Guides; and 3 — Technical Reports. The Nuclear Energy Basic Principles publication describes the rationale and vision for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Objectives publications explain the expectations to be met in various areas at different stages of implementation. Nuclear Energy Series Guides provide high level guidance on how to achieve the objectives related to the various topics and areas involving the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Technical Reports provide additional, more detailed information on activities related to the various areas dealt with in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications are coded as follows: NG — general; NP — nuclear power; NF — nuclear fuel; NW — radioactive waste management and decommissioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Electricity Market
    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on Economic Affairs 2nd Report of Session 2016–17 The Price of Power: Reforming the Electricity Market Ordered to be printed 8 February 2017 and published 24 February 2017 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 113 Select Committee on Economic Affairs The Economic Affairs Committee was appointed by the House of Lords in this session “to consider economic affairs”. Membership The Members of the Select Committee on Economic Affairs are: Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted Lord Layard Lord Burns Lord Livermore Lord Darling of Roulanish Lord Sharkey Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Lord Tugendhat Lord Hollick (Chairman) Lord Turnbull Lord Kerr of Kinlochard Baroness Wheatcroft Lord Lamont of Lerwick Declaration of interests See Appendix 1. A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords- interests Publications All publications of the Committee are available at: http://www.parliament.uk/hleconomicaffairs Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the Committee’s meetings are available at: http://www.parliamentlive.tv Further information Further information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee staff The staff who worked on this inquiry were Ayeesha Waller (Clerk), Ben McNamee (Policy Analyst), Oswin Taylor (Committee Assistant) and Dr Aaron Goater and Dr Jonathan Wentworth of the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Contact details All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Economic Affairs Committee, Committee Office, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Pull-Outs, Rumours, Threats
    Nuclear Pull-outs, Rumours, Threats Briefing (3rd Edition): November 2013 Date Utility/Company Country Pull-out, rumour or threat Early 2009 Entergy US Suspends applications for Grand Gulf (Mississippi) and River Bend (Louisiana) April 2009 Ameren UE US Cancels plans to build Callaway 2 (Missouri) December 2009 Unistar Nuclear US Suspends application for Nine Mile Point 3 (New York) October 2010 Constellation Energy US Pulls out of joint venture with EDF to build Calvert Cliffs 3 (Maryland) March 2011 Commerzbank Germany Pulls out of Jaitapur nuclear project in Maharashtra, India May 2011 Swiss Government Switzerland The Swiss Government announces plans to phas- out nuclear power by 2034. May 2011 German Government Germany German Government announces plans to phase- out nuclear power by 2022. June 2011 Italian Government Italy More than 94% of voters in a referendum opposed the government’s plans to resume nuclear power generation. August 2011 Tennessee Valley US Suspends plans for 2 reactors at Bellefonte Authority (Alabama) September 2011 Siemens Germany Quits nuclear industry September 2011 SSE Scotland Pulls out of UK NuGen consortium September 2011 Shaw US Announces sale of 20% share in Westinghouse November 2011 Belgian Government Belgium Belgium's main political parties have agreed on a plan to shut down the country's two nuclear power stations by 2025, with the oldest reactors closing by 2015. January 2012 Progress Energy US Expects to pull-out from planned Levy 1 and 2 reactors (Florida) March 2012 E.ON Germany Announces pull-out from UK Horizon March 2012 RWE nPower Germany Announces pull-out from UK Horizon April 2012 Centrica UK Threatens pull-out from UK Hinkley consortium without UK Gov’t assurances on future price of nuclear electricity.
    [Show full text]