DOCSLIB.ORG

Monday 23 March 2020 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monday 23 March 2020 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS 1 SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Monday 23 March 2020 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS CORONAVIRUS BILL GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote. Negatived: rejected without a vote. Negatived on division: rejected following a vote. Not called: debated in a group of amendments, but not put to a decision. Not moved: not debated or put to a decision. Question proposed: debate underway but not concluded. Withdrawn after debate: moved and debated but then withdrawn, so not put to a decision. Not selected: not chosen for debate by the Chair. Clauses 1 to 7 agreed to. Jeremy Corbyn John McDonnell Rachael Maskell Rebecca Long Bailey Nick Thomas-Symonds Mr Nicholas Brown Not called 74 Clause 8,page2, line 29, leave out “loss of” 2 Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 23 March 2020 Coronavirus Bill, continued Jeremy Corbyn John McDonnell Rachael Maskell Rebecca Long Bailey Nick Thomas-Symonds Mr Nicholas Brown Not called 75 Clause 8,page2, line 34, leave out subsection (3) Jeremy Corbyn John McDonnell Rachael Maskell Rebecca Long Bailey Nick Thomas-Symonds Mr Nicholas Brown Not called 76 Clause 8,page3, leave out from “care” in line 27 to end of line 31 Clause agreed to. Clauses 9 and 10 agreed to. Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 20 Clause 11,page6, line 7, leave out “or to the extent that” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 12 to 30 agreed to. Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 21 Clause 31,page22, line 1, at beginning insert “Subject to subsection (10A),” Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 22 Clause 31,page22, line 5, at end insert— “(10A) Where the notice relates to a person specified by name— (a) the Welsh Ministers must give a copy of the notice to that person, and (b) the published version of the notice must not identify any individual without their consent.” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 32 to 36 agreed to. Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 23 March 2020 3 Coronavirus Bill, continued Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 40 Clause 37,page25, line 27, at end insert— “(2) The Social Security Administration Act 1992 has effect as if in section 113A (statutory sick pay and statutory maternity pay: breach of regulations)— (a) in subsection (1)(c), after “153(5)(b)” there were inserted “or 159B”; (b) in subsection (3), after “132” there were inserted “of this Act, or section 159B of the Contributions and Benefits Act”. (3) The Social Security Administration Act 1992 has effect as if in section 113B (statutory sick pay and statutory maternity pay: fraud and negligence)— (a) in subsection (1)(b)(iii), after “153(5)(b)” there were inserted “or 159B”; (b) after subsection (2) there were inserted— “(2A) Where an employer fraudulently or negligently receives a payment in pursuance of regulations under section 159B of the Contributions and Benefits Act (funding of employers’ statutory sick pay liabilities in relation to coronavirus), the employer is liable to a penalty not exceeding £3,000.”” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Jeremy Corbyn John McDonnell Rachael Maskell Rebecca Long Bailey Nick Thomas-Symonds Mr Nicholas Brown Not called 78 Clause 38,page25, line 43, at end insert— “(8) Section 153(9) is repealed.” Clause agreed to. Jeremy Corbyn John McDonnell Rachael Maskell Rebecca Long Bailey Nick Thomas-Symonds Mr Nicholas Brown Not called 77 Clause 39,page26, line 12, at end insert “and, in particular such regulations shall deem ‘a day of incapacity’ in this part of the Act to include— “(i) a day of self-isolation in accordance with the aforesaid guidance or published document of the aforesaid bodies; (ii) a day reasonably necessitated to care for a person needing such care who— (a) is suffering from severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 or other communicable disease; or 4 Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 23 March 2020 Coronavirus Bill, continued (b) is self-isolating in accordance with the aforesaid guidance or published document of the aforesaid bodies; or (c) is unable sufficiently to care for themselves and who is unable to attend an establishment or a carer who would otherwise provide care but is unable to do so by reason that the establishment or the carer is acting in accordance with the aforesaid guidance or published document of the aforesaid bodies or is unable to provide that care because others are acting in accordance with the aforesaid guidance or published document of the aforesaid bodies; (d) qualifies for time off pursuant to s.57A Employment Rights Act 1996 (time off for dependants).” Clause agreed to. Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 41 Clause 40,page27, line 33, at end insert— “(2) The Social Security Administration (Northern Ireland) Act 1992 has effect as if in section 107A (statutory sick pay and statutory maternity pay: breach of regulations)— (a) in subsection (1)(c), after “149(5)(b)” there were inserted “or 155B”; (b) in subsection (3), after “124” there were inserted “of this Act, or section 155B of the Contributions and Benefits Act”. (3) The Social Security Administration (Northern Ireland) Act 1992 has effect as if in section 107B (statutory sick pay and statutory maternity pay: fraud and negligence)— (a) in subsection (1)(b)(iii), after “149(5)(b)” there were inserted “or 155B”; (b) after subsection (2) there were inserted— “(2A) Where an employer fraudulently or negligently receives a payment in pursuance of regulations under section 155B of the Contributions and Benefits Act (funding of employers’ statutory sick pay liabilities in relation to coronavirus), the employer is liable to a penalty not exceeding £3,000.”” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 41 to 57 agreed to. Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 23 March 2020 5 Coronavirus Bill, continued Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 79 Clause 52,page30, line 27, at end insert— “(aa) the Extradition Act 2003,” Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 26 Clause 58,page33, line 2, leave out “the day on which this Act is passed” and insert “16 March 2020” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Clause 59 agreed to. Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 27 Clause 60,page34, line 42, leave out paragraph (a) and insert— “(a) acts or omissions in connection with an election, referendum or recall petition prior to its postponement (including provision disapplying any enactment imposing criminal liability in respect of such acts or omissions);” Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 28 Clause 60,page35, line 14, at end insert— “(i) the membership or governance arrangements of a local authority in relation to which an order has been made under section 7 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 (implementation of structural changes proposals), the membership or governance arrangements of any shadow authority established under such an order, or any other matter dealt with in such an order.” Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 29 Clause 60,page35, line 15, leave out subsection (3) and insert— “(3) Regulations under subsection (1) may make retrospective provision, including provision having effect in relation to times before the coming into force of this Act.” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 61 and 62 agreed to. 6 Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 23 March 2020 Coronavirus Bill, continued Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 30 Clause 63,page36, line 30, leave out “the day on which this Act is passed” and insert “16 March 2020” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 31 Clause 64,page37, line 11, leave out paragraph (a) and insert— “(a) acts or omissions in connection with an election prior to its postponement (including provision disapplying any enactment imposing criminal liability in respect of such acts or omissions);” Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 32 Clause 64,page37, line 25, leave out subsection (3) and insert— “(3) Regulations under subsection (1) may make retrospective provision, including provision having effect in relation to times before the coming into force of this Act.” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 65 to 73 agreed to. Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 33 Clause 74,page44, line 14, leave out “57” and insert “(Elections and referendums due to be held in England in period after 15 March 2020)” Secretary Matt Hancock Agreed to 23 Clause 74,page44, line 15, at end insert— “(xa) section (Disapplication of limit under section 8 of the Industrial Development Act 1982);” Clause, as amended, agreed to. Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 23 March 2020 7 Coronavirus Bill, continued Ms Harriet Harman Mr David Davis Mr Andrew Mitchell Ms Karen Buck Joanna Cherry Debbie Abrahams Alex Sobel Andy Slaughter Clive Efford Alex Davies-Jones Rosie Duffield Meg Hillier Jack Dromey Feryal Clark Ms Angela Eagle Stella Creasy Gareth Thomas Marsha De Cordova Ian Murray Anna McMorrin Preet Kaur Gill Mrs Sharon Hodgson Catherine West Sarah Owen Lilian Greenwood Catherine McKinnell Carol Monaghan Dr Philippa Whitford Jamie Stone Layla Moran Yvette Cooper Sir Robert Neill Munira Wilson Sir Edward Davey Mr Alistair Carmichael Dame Margaret Hodge Hilary Benn Christine Jardine Caroline Lucas Daisy Cooper Stephen Farry Colum Eastwood Sarah Olney Wendy Chamberlain Claire Hanna Not called 1 Clause 75,page45, line 25, leave out subsection (1) and insert— “(1) This Act expires at the end of the period of 6 months beginning with the date on which it is passed (subject to subsection (1A)). (1A) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide for this Act (or specified provisions) to continue to have effect for an additional period not exceeding 6 months. (1B) Regulations under subsection (1A)— (a) shall be made by statutory instrument, and (b) may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by resolution of each House of Parliament.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Those Who Pledged, 43 Were Elected As
    First name Last name Full name Constituency Party Rosena Allin-Khan Rosena Allin-Khan Tooting Labour Fleur Anderson Fleur Anderson Putney Labour Tonia Antoniazzi Tonia Antoniazzi Gower Labour Ben Bradshaw Ben Bradshaw Exeter Labour Graham Brady Graham Brady Altrincham and Sale West Conservative Nicholas Brown Nicholas Brown Newcastle upon Tyne East Labour Wendy Chamberlain Wendy Chamberlain North East Fife Lib Dem Angela Crawley Angela Crawley Lanark and Hamilton East SNP Edward Davey Edward Davey Kingston and Surbiton Lib Dem Florence Eshalomi Florence Eshalomi Vauxhall Labour Tim Farron Tim Farron Westmorland and Lonsdale Lib Dem Simon Fell Simon Fell Barrow and Furness Conservative Yvonne Fovargue Yvonne Fovargue Makerfield Labour Mary Foy Mary Foy City Of Durham Labour Kate Green Kate Green Stretford and Urmston Labour Fabian Hamilton Fabian Hamilton Leeds North East Labour Helen Hayes Helen Hayes Dulwich and West Norwood Labour Dan Jarvis Dan Jarvis Barnsley Central Labour Clive Lewis Clive Lewis Norwich South Labour Caroline Lucas Caroline Lucas Brighton, Pavilion Green Justin Madders Justin Madders Ellesmere Port and Neston Labour Kerry McCarthy Kerry McCarthy Bristol East Labour Layla Moran Layla Moran Oxford West and Abingdon Lib Dem Penny Mordaunt Penny Mordaunt Portsmouth North Conservative Jessica Morden Jessica Morden Newport East Labour Stephen Morgan Stephen Morgan Portsmouth South Labour Ian Murray Ian Murray Edinburgh South Labour Yasmin Qureshi Yasmin Qureshi Bolton South East Labour Jonathan Reynolds Jonathan Reynolds
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Thursday, 29 April 2021 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Thursday, 29 April 2021 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 29 April 2021 and the information is correct at the time of publication (04:42 P.M., 29 April 2021). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 11 Energy Intensive Industries: ATTORNEY GENERAL 11 Biofuels 18 Crown Prosecution Service: Environment Protection: Job Training 11 Creation 19 Sentencing: Appeals 11 EU Grants and Loans: Iron and Steel 19 BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 12 Facebook: Advertising 20 Aviation and Shipping: Carbon Foreign Investment in UK: Budgets 12 National Security 20 Bereavement Leave 12 Help to Grow Scheme 20 Business Premises: Horizon Europe: Quantum Coronavirus 12 Technology and Space 21 Carbon Emissions 13 Horticulture: Job Creation 21 Clean Technology Fund 13 Housing: Natural Gas 21 Companies: West Midlands 13 Local Government Finance: Job Creation 22 Coronavirus: Vaccination 13 Members: Correspondence 22 Deep Sea Mining: Reviews 14 Modern Working Practices Economic Situation: Holiday Review 22 Leave 14 Overseas Aid: China 23 Electric Vehicles: Batteries 15 Park Homes: Energy Supply 23 Electricity: Billing 15 Ports: Scotland 24 Employment Agencies 16 Post Offices: ICT 24 Employment Agencies: Pay 16 Remote Working: Coronavirus 24 Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate and Renewable Energy: Finance 24 National Minimum Wage Research: Africa 25 Enforcement Unit 17 Summertime
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Party General Election 2017 Report Labour Party General Election 2017 Report
    FOR THE MANY NOT THE FEW LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT Page 7 Contents 1. Introduction from Jeremy Corbyn 07 2. General Election 2017: Results 11 3. General Election 2017: Labour’s message and campaign strategy 15 3.1 Campaign Strategy and Key Messages 16 3.2 Supporting the Ground Campaign 20 3.3 Campaigning with Women 21 3.4 Campaigning with Faith, Ethnic Minority Communities 22 3.5 Campaigning with Youth, First-time Voters and Students 23 3.6 Campaigning with Trade Unions and Affiliates 25 4. General Election 2017: the campaign 27 4.1 Manifesto and campaign documents 28 4.2 Leader’s Tour 30 4.3 Deputy Leader’s Tour 32 4.4 Party Election Broadcasts 34 4.5 Briefing and Information 36 4.6 Responding to Our Opponents 38 4.7 Press and Broadcasting 40 4.8 Digital 43 4.9 New Campaign Technology 46 4.10 Development and Fundraising 48 4.11 Nations and Regions Overview 49 4.12 Scotland 50 4.13 Wales 52 4.14 Regional Directors Reports 54 4.15 Events 64 4.16 Key Campaigners Unit 65 4.17 Endorsers 67 4.18 Constitutional and Legal services 68 5. Labour candidates 69 General Election 2017 Report Page 9 1. INTRODUCTION 2017 General Election Report Page 10 1. INTRODUCTION Foreword I’d like to thank all the candidates, party members, trade unions and supporters who worked so hard to achieve the result we did. The Conservatives called the snap election in order to increase their mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Tabled on Thu 2 Jul 2020
    Published: Friday 3 July 2020 Questions tabled on Thursday 2 July 2020 Includes questions tabled on earlier days which have been transferred. T Indicates a topical oral question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. † Indicates a Question not included in the random selection process but accepted because the quota for that day had not been filled. N Indicates a question for written answer on a named day under S.O. No. 22(4). [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Monday 6 July Questions for Written Answer 1 Simon Baynes (Clwyd South): To ask the Attorney General, how many sentence have been extended under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme in each of the last six months. (68445) 2 N Owen Thompson (Midlothian): To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will (a) issue guidance to the general public and (b) make a public announcement advising people living in England not to enter Scotland in order to help contain the spread of covid-19. [Transferred] (66932) 3 James Wild (North West Norfolk): To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment he has made of the effect of the Supreme Court ruling in R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) UKSC 2018/0104 on the Carltona principle set out in the Cabinet Manual. (68439) 4 James Wild (North West Norfolk): To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether he plans to bring forward legislative proposals to give statutory effect to the Carltona principle. (68440) 5 N Gill Furniss (Sheffield, Brightside and Hillsborough): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps he is taking to encourage businesses to incorporate gender impact assessments into their plans to reopen with alternative working arrangements after the covid-19 lockdown.
    [Show full text]
  • Proxy Voting May Also Be in the Hon
    913 Points of Order 13 SEPTEMBER 2018 914 Mr Speaker: It is possible that that would result. It Proxy Voting may also be in the hon. Gentleman’s mind in making that perfectly reasonable suggestion that if there were 1.13 pm such a regular opportunity, it would give him the chance to show what a thoroughly agreeable fellow he can be. The Leader of the House of Commons (Andrea Leadsom): [Interruption.] I think we will leave it there for today. I I beg to move, am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his characteristic That this House has considered proxy voting in the House of ingenuity and to colleagues for their points of order. Commons. Today’simportant debate has been eagerly anticipated by a number of Members across the House. It was, of course, scheduled for before the summer recess, but it was right that a statement on a matter of national security took precedence on that day. I am pleased, however, that we are able to hear the views of the House today, and consider the many issues surrounding the matter. I have made my personal commitment clear—I want a House of Commons suited to our times. I pay tribute to all MPs who have helped to progress this important issue. Members of all parties have shown true commitment to making positive changes in Parliament. In particular, the right hon. and learned Member for Camberwell and Peckham (Ms Harman) and my right hon. Friend the Member for Basingstoke (Mrs Miller) are vocal advocates of this matter. I also thank my hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Wednesday, 24 October 2018 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Wednesday, 24 October 2018 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 24 October 2018 and the information is correct at the time of publication (06:39 P.M., 24 October 2018). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 5 Civil Service: Labour Turnover 13 BUSINESS, ENERGY AND Government Departments: INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 5 Cybercrime 14 Coal Fired Power Stations 5 Public Sector: Procurement 14 Coventry University and DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND Warwick University: Research 5 SPORT 15 Electricity 6 Cybercrime 15 Employment: Standards 7 Gaming Machines 15 EU Emissions Trading ICT: Vacancies 15 Scheme 7 Museums and Galleries: Fuel Poverty 8 Glasgow 16 Green Deal Scheme: Appeals 9 EDUCATION 16 Iron and Steel: Industry 9 Apprentices: Skilled Workers 16 Manufacturing Industries: EU Assessments 17 Countries 10 Collective Spirit Free School Natural Gas 10 Oldham 17 Natural Gas: Northern Ireland 11 Extracurricular Activities: Nuclear Power: Employment 11 Finance 17 Radioactive Waste: Irish Sea 12 GCSE 18 Renewable Energy 12 Pupils: Absenteeism 19 Renewable Energy: Pupils: Parents 19 Expenditure 12 School Leaving: New Wind Power: Construction 13 Businesses 20 CABINET OFFICE 13 Teachers: Cheshire 21 Cabinet Office: Universal Training 21 Credit 13 ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND Bangladesh: Roads 29 RURAL AFFAIRS 23 Bangladesh: Rohingya 30 [Subject Heading to be Foreign and Commonwealth Assigned]
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Meryn Ward
    Lord Agnew Kt DL Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the School System Sanctuary Buildings Great Smith Street Westminster London SW1P 3BT tel: 0370 000 2288 www.education.gov.uk/help/contactus Mervyn Ward Warrington and Vale Royal College Winwick Road Warrington Cheshire WA2 8QA 23 January 2020 L I am writing following the assessment of Warrington and Vale Royal College by the Further Education (FE) Commissioner. The FE Commissioner’s Team visited the college on 23 July and 29 August 2019 to undertake a formal intervention following the issuance of a notice of concern by the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) on 17 June 2019. This had been triggered by the college’s inadequate financial health grade. The FE Commissioner’s report confirms that the college is in a very weak financial position and is at significant risk of insolvency by 2020/21 unless appropriate steps are taken to secure the liquidity of the college. I am encouraged by the FE Commissioner’s Team’s observations that you, the board and the college executive are well placed to address the current issues and have demonstrated that you are prepared to act quickly and decisively to achieve financial stability to the college through the sale of its Hartford Campus. The importance of this sale to ensuring the future viability of the college cannot be overstated and I advise you to prioritise its successful completion and to continue making robust financial preparations to maintain solvency should the sale be delayed further. I am in full agreement with the FE Commissioner that the significant and continuing loss of learners from the former Mid-Cheshire campuses is an extremely concerning trend which the senior leadership team must address with immediate effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Thursday Volume 635 1 February 2018 No. 90 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 1 February 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 953 1 FEBRUARY 2018 954 Mr Walker: The Government have been talking to a House of Commons wide range of industry groups and representative bodies of business, and we recognise that there are benefits in some areas of maintaining regulatory alignment and Thursday 1 February 2018 ensuring that we have the most frictionless access to European markets. Of course we are entering the The House met at half-past Nine o’clock negotiations on the future partnership, and we want to take the best opportunities to trade with Europe and the wider world. PRAYERS Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con): Is it true that Michel Barnier has basically offered us the Canada [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] model, agreement on which could be reached this year, thus negating the need for any transition period? Mr Walker: The Government’s policy is that we are Oral Answers to Questions pursuing a bespoke trade agreement, not an off-the-shelf model. We believe that it will be in the interests of both sides in this negotiation to secure an implementation period. EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION Stephen Timms (East Ham) (Lab): The European The Secretary of State was asked— Union has clearly and firmly set out its views on the options for these negotiations. Ministers so far have Regulatory Equivalence signally failed to provide any coherent response because they cannot agree among one another, and the Minister’s 1.
    [Show full text]
  • How Labour Can Rebuild the Red Wall Across the North Labour for the North Labour's Northern Soul
    Labour’s Northern Soul How Labour can rebuild the Red Wall across the North Labour for the North Labour's Northern Soul Labour for the North is a new group working to give Northern Labour MPs a stronger voice in the Labour party and to make sure the government delivers for the North for the North, open to all Labour MPs in the North West, North East, Yorkshire and the Humber. It is co-chaired by Justin Madders, Peter Dowd and Judith Cummins. For more information about the group, please contact [email protected] Labour for the North 2 Contents Foreword 4 Full Recommendations 7 Part I — The Long Retreat 16 Part II — 2016 And After 49 Part III — What To Expect 57 Acknowledgements 65 Appendices are available separately on request December 2020 © Labour for the North Foreword In Summer 2019 we formed the close to turning blue. Our sense Labour for the North Group to that the party had a ‘Northern bring together Labour MPs from problem’ had been heartbreakingly across the North of England. We proved right. We strongly believe felt that it was important to amplify that this forum, alongside co- the voice of Northern Labour MPs ordinated action for the North, is both within the party and outside needed now more than ever. it. We were responding to what we believed was a growing view that This report explains what happened the Labour Party was a London- in December 2019. In common centric entity and insufficiently with other reports that have looked sensitive to the needs of the North.
    [Show full text]
  • Shape of Things to Come?
    SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME? PROFILING THE NEXT GENERATION OF HEALTH ADVOCATES IN PARLIAMENT #MakingPerfectSenseofHealth | @MHPHealth 1 Shape of Things to Come? FOREWORD PETE DIGGER MANAGING DIRECTOR, ENGINE | MHP The General Election result of “ A diminished Official Opposition December 2019 has effectively put means that backbench voices an end to the uncertainty around the are likely to be more influential UK’s departure from the European than ever.” Union. However, the exodus of a large As a result of the arithmetic in the House number of established backbench of Commons, the last Parliament was parliamentarians and likely changes characterised by stasis for the NHS, even to the structure of government despite May’s injection of cash and the present a new and uncharted development of the Long Term Plan. environment for those looking to There was no primary legislation, with action engage with policymakers. playing out in the corridors of NHS England, the Department and HM Treasury. Things will Nowhere is that more the case than in be different this time: December’s Queen’s healthcare, where a number of high-profile Speech contained five bills within health and MPs including former Health Committee Chair social care, with the most significant legislative Dr Sarah Wollaston and APPG for Cancer proposals proposed by NHS England still to Chair Nic Dakin are no longer in post. come. A sizable working Conservative majority means much of this will enter into law. However However, while the loss of those expert the opportunities for scrutiny and amendments voices in health and care is notable, there during the passage of any piece of legislation are many potential advocates among the gives Parliament a renewed sense of new intake of MPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments and the Pandemic (PDF)
    Parliaments and the Pandemic Study of Parliament Group January 2021 Preface The Study of Parliament Group (SPG) was formed in 1964. It arose following the publication of Bernard Crick’s seminal book, 'The Reform of Parliament'. A senior clerk in the House of Commons, Michael Ryle, impressed by the work, but feeling that the author may have benefited from more informed knowledge of the actual operation of parliament, contacted Crick. Both felt that meetings between academics and clerks may be of mutual benefit and, with Sir Edward Fellowes, former Clerk of the House of Commons, they sent a memorandum to various parliamentary officers and academics with an interest in parliament. A meeting was organised in October 1964 at which it was agreed to form a body to promote understanding of the way parliament worked and how it may be more effective. The Study of Parliament Group was born. Since its formation, the Group has held conferences and seminars, formed various working groups and been responsible for publishing books and articles. Submissions have also been made to various parliamentary committees, not least those concerned with procedure and reform. The membership has expanded over the years, encompassing clerks from other legislatures in the United Kingdom as well as some with a scholarly interest in parliament without themselves being academics. To encourage frank exchanges of views, MPs and journalists are excluded from membership, though they are regular speakers at Group events. Publications have included substantial volumes such as 'The House of Commons in the Twentieth Century' (1979), 'The New Select Committees' (revised edn.
    [Show full text]