Public Service Media Under Crossfire by Protest Movements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Service Media Under Crossfire by Protest Movements March 2019 Media Programme South East Europe Public Service Media Under Crossfire by Protest Movements Protesters in South East Europe criticise their governments and demand more independence of the public broadcasters Hendrik Sittig, Darija Fabijanić There is seething unrest in South East Europe and immediately it is called ”Balkan Spring.” Many people are protesting in the capitals of Serbia, Montenegro, Albania and Croatia out of dissatisfaction with their governments. This frustration is targeted towards the media in these countries as well – especially the public service media which are frequently considered a mouthpiece of the government. The protesters therefore call for resignation of the general directors of the broadcasters. “There won’t be a Balkan spring,” says Maja General of the public broadcaster „Radio Kocijančič, Spokesperson for Foreign Affairs and Televizija Crne Gore“ (RTCG), Božidar Šundić, and Security Policy/European Neighbourhood Policy the dissolution of the RTCG Council. One of the and Enlargement Negotiations at the European march’s organisers Omer Šarkić explains: “This is Commission. “Protests in every country have not a public service broadcaster, but a their own characteristics and I would not propaganda service. For 30 years it disinforms, compare those situations.”1 But she admits that disputes and divides us, instead of informing, there are common elements like corruption, educating and uniting us.”2 Opposition parties opaque power structures and lack of media called for boycotts of the broadcaster. transparency. Due to the wish of more media Furthermore, they started a campaign against freedom, public service media (PSM) are also RTCG by putting stickers onto the RTCG building caught in the crossfire of the protesters. From and other places in Podgorica. their viewpoint, the PSM are too close to the Afterwards, RTCG released following statement: government and are not reporting critically “The management as well as the editorial office enough. of the public broadcaster warns the national and international public that RTCG is put under Montenegro unseen pressure by media, political parties and civil society. It’s about open calls for boycotting Since 2 February, every Saturday up to 10,000 the public broadcaster and for workers to ignore citizens rally against the government in the their tasks. With this model they want to create Montenegrin capital Podgorica. This is a chaos in our media house. We understand the remarkable number considering the fact that the need of the protesters to express their wish for city has only 150,000 inhabitants. The cause for non-institutional change of government which is these protests was a bribery scandal which their choice; however we raise our voice against resulted in the initiative „Odupri se – 97000“ the manner by trying with explicit threats to („Resist – 97000“). They demand resignation of influence the programme of the public president Milo Đukanović, who rules the country broadcaster.“3 Director-General Šundić told already for 30 years, and of further high-level Dnevne novine daily that nobody would resign. officials from the government and judiciary. More The management did its job professionally and than that, the protesters criticise general that only those who elected them can judge structural issues like the poor media situation. them. In addition he admits that it was legitimate Hence, they request resignation of the Director- to strike, criticise and request resignations.4 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e. V. country report March 2019 2 2 Serbia Croatia In Serbia people are already rallying for quite Meanwhile in the EU country Croatia public some time and demonstrating against President service media were also criticised and on 2 March Aleksander Vučić. The protests began on 8 it came to first demonstrations. Compared to the December in Belgrade – with the slogan „Stop neighbouring countries where the initiatives are krvavim košuljama” („Stop the bloody shirts!” “). rooted from the society and citizens, in Zagreb it The cause was an attack on the party leader of was a journalists‘ protest und opposed primarily the Leftists Borko Stefanović. Since then the public broadcaster „Hrvatska Radio Televizija“ protesters meet every Saturday in the streets of (HRT). Belgrade and every Friday in the regions with In the last couple of years criticism against HRT paroles like „1 od 5 miliona“ („1 out of 5 million“) increased, especially due to the appointment und „Počelo je“ („It has started“)5 and ask for the policy of the general management which was full investigation of the attack. In the meantime switched often after government change. other demands were added, e.g. more media Particularly in 2016 the dismissal of the director- freedom. On the website of the protest general caused international outrage, after movement the explicit demands are listed. One already 70 journalists and editors have been of them is directly targeted towards public demoted or reassigned at HRT. The current broadcaster „Radio Televizija Srbije“ (RTS): demonstration was caused however by lawsuits which were filed by HRT against other media as › objective reporting about the demonstrations well as their own journalists. 36 court on RTS proceedings are ongoing where HRT is suing for 6 › five minute airtime on public service media for overall 2.227.500 Kuna (ca. 300.000 Euro) for the organisers of the protests defamation and acts against HRT's honour and › same airtime for all political actors reputation. Lawsuits are also filed against the › change of RTS Director-General Dragan president of the Croatian Journalists Association Bujošević and Editor of the News Programmes (HND) Hrvoje Zovko and the president of the Nenad Lj. Stefanović HND branch at HRT Sanja Mikleušević Pavić because they were criticising their employer On top of that protesters were also showing their publically. The Association is one of the main unrest against public service media by putting organisers of the protest and explains that the stickers („1 out of 5 million“ or „censured!“) on the goal of these lawsuits is to intimidate and RTS building. By this campaign not only RTS was discourage journalists to write critically about the affected, but also pro-government private „Pink public broadcaster. TV“ and daily „Politika“. Hence, one of the main requests of the initiative Additionally there was an one-hour blockade of „Novinarstvo ne damo“ („We aren’t giving up the RTS building to which the broadcaster journalism“) is to drop the lawsuits. At the reacted with following statement: „ This blockade beginning this initiative consisted of 30 civil crosses the border between legitimate protest society organisations which weren’t only calling and illegitimate pressure on employees of the for demonstrations but also a boycott of HRT for public broadcaster.“ RTS hasn’t commented yet two weeks. Opposition parties have also joined on the protesters‘ demands of management the boycott. It went so far that the MP of the resignation. In January, the Director-General was Social Democratic Party (SDP) Gordan Maras supposed to retire due to grounds of age. kicked out a HRT crew from his press conference. However the council prolonged his mandate for A lot of people condemned this – also HND another six months. Organisers announced president Zovko. Maras later apologised. further demonstrations. HRT Director-General Kazimir Bačić expressed his opinions on these events during a press conference: “With this [boycott] the public television is prevented to do its work in informing the public. We consider this a direct hit against Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e. V. country report March 2019 3 3 journalism and unseen political pressure on the some construction projects caused unrest among public television. We request to be protected citizens, e.g. a new city highway in Tirana. This led from this political pressure and that the public to bigger protests which were directed towards television is not used for political interests and the government of Edi Rama. The situation got political score setting.”7 even worse because members of the opposition In the parliament the current situation with HRT have been boycotting the parliament. Contrary to was also discussed. Civil society actors and the other countries public service media hasn’t politicians from the opposition blame the been criticised yet. government of Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for appointing a management close to the Structural issues of PSM as a cause government for this political dependence. The protest march thus passed buildings of the In conclusion Maja Kocijančič is right when she Ministry of Culture and the government where says that this is not a “Balkan Spring.” It is not a eight demands were left.8 regional movement with common actors because the causes are local. However, there are 1. End the misuse of lawsuits as leverage similarities, as it was caused in all countries by against journalists. frustration over economic and political 2. Protect journalists who warn publically circumstances. In the end the reasons are due to about the pressure. structural problems; despite being nominally 3. Secure depolitisation of the Council for democracies the formal control mechanisms are Electronic Media. influenced by state leadership. It is apparent in all 4. Release the management of the public countries that laws are easily passed in broadcaster from its mandate and quickly parliament, the judiciary is not always working change the law on HRT. independently and public service media are often 5. Secure the implementation of the law on functioning as a mouthpiece for the ruling media and the statute of media. parties. These structural issues and lack of 6. Prevent the usurpation of media by local political will for reforms allow these officials. dependencies. In the case of PSM it occurs due to 7. Find blackmailer and attackers of journalists the way of funding and the appointment of and bring them to court. control bodies. Comparably small budgets and 8. Support quality journalism publically.
Recommended publications
  • How Public Service Broadcasters in the Western Balkans Interact with Their Audiences
    Public services without a public? How Public Service Broadcasters in the Western Balkans interact wiTh their audiences ¿Servicios Públicos sin público? Cómo los PSB interactúan con sus audiencias en los Países Balcánicos Occidentales Davor Marko (Analitika, Centre for Social Research, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina) [[email protected]] http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/IC.2017.i01.08 E-ISSN: 2173-1071 IC – Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación 2017, 14, pp. 217 - 242 Abstract Struggling to cope with structural societal changes, digitalized news production, and the modified habits of fragmented media publics, public service broadcasters are expected to redefine the logic of their operations in order to regain the trust of citizens and engage them. This paper looks at how public service broadcasters in seven countries of the Western Balkans have embraced new approaches, technologies, and online channels to foster interaction with their audiences. This includes the analysis of their structures, the popularity of offline programmes, and the use of online channels to reach the public, on the basis of evidence, experiences and specific findings collected during the period 2014-2016, as part of the project implemented by the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) and the Centre for Social Research Analitika (Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina). Resumen Habitamos un contexto complejo en que los medios requieren (1) abordar cambios sociales significativos en las sociedades, (2) la digitalización de la producción de noticias y (3) las modificaciones en los hábitos de los fragmentarios públicos. En este entorno los medios de servicio público han de redefinir la lógica de su proceder de cara a la recuperación de la confianza entre la ciudadanía, restaurando los vínculos.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground
    Media Programme SEE A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground Public Service Media in South East Europe RECONNECTING WITH DATA CITIZENS TO BIG VALUES – FROM A Pillar of Democracy of Shaky on Ground A Pillar www.kas.de www.kas.dewww.kas.de Media Programme SEE A Pillar of Democracy on Shaky Ground Public Service Media in South East Europe www.kas.de Imprint Copyright © 2019 by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Media Programme South East Europe Publisher Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Authors Viktorija Car, Nadine Gogu, Liana Ionescu, Ilda Londo, Driton Qeriqi, Miroljub Radojković, Nataša Ružić, Dragan Sekulovski, Orlin Spassov, Romina Surugiu, Lejla Turčilo, Daphne Wolter Editors Darija Fabijanić, Hendrik Sittig Proofreading Boryana Desheva, Louisa Spencer Translation (Bulgarian, German, Montenegrin) Boryana Desheva, KERN AG, Tanja Luburić Opinion Poll Ipsos (Ivica Sokolovski), KAS Media Programme South East Europe (Darija Fabijanić) Layout and Design Velin Saramov Cover Illustration Dineta Saramova ISBN 978-3-95721-596-3 Disclaimer All rights reserved. Requests for review copies and other enquiries concerning this publication are to be sent to the publisher. The responsibility for facts, opinions and cross references to external sources in this publication rests exclusively with the contributors and their interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Table of Content Preface v Public Service Media and Its Future: Legitimacy in the Digital Age (the German case) 1 Survey on the Perception of Public Service
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG RESEARCH STADIUM D2.1 State
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG RESEARCH SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Theme 7 - Transport Collaborative Project – Grant Agreement Number 234127 STADIUM Smart Transport Applications Designed for large events with Impacts on Urban Mobility D2.1 State-of-the-Art Report Project Start Date and Duration 01 May 2009, 48 months Deliverable no. D2.1 Dissemination level PU Planned submission date 30-November 2009 Actual submission date 30 May 2011 Responsible organization TfL with assistance from IMPACTS WP2-SOTA Report May 2011 1 Document Title: State of the Art Report WP number: 2 Document Version Comments Date Authorized History by Version 0.1 Revised SOTA 23/05/11 IJ Version 0.2 Version 0.3 Number of pages: 81 Number of annexes: 9 Responsible Organization: Principal Author(s): IMPACTS Europe Ian Johnson Contributing Organization(s): Contributing Author(s): Transport for London Tony Haynes Hal Evans Peer Rewiew Partner Date Version 0.1 ISIS 27/05/11 Approval for delivery ISIS Date Version 0.1 Coordination 30/05/11 WP2-SOTA Report May 2011 2 Table of Contents 1.TU UT ReferenceTU DocumentsUT ...................................................................................................... 8 2.TU UT AnnexesTU UT ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.TU UT ExecutiveTU SummaryUT ....................................................................................................... 10 3.1.TU UT ContextTU UT ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service Broadcasting in Montenegro
    ANALITIKA Center for Social Research Working Paper 4/2017 Public Service Broadcasting in Montenegro Nataša Ružić Public Service Broadcasting in Montenegro Nataša Ružić ANALITIKA Center for Social Research Sarajevo, 2017 Title: Public Service Broadcasting in Montenegro Author: Nataša Ružić Published by: Analitika – Center for Social Research Year: 2017 © Analitika – Center for Social Research, All Rights Reserved Publisher Address: Hamdije Kreševljakovića 50, 71000 Sarajevo, BiH [email protected] www.analitika.ba Proofreading: Gina Landor Copy Editing: Mirela Rožajac-Zulčić Design: Branka Ilić DTP: Jasmin Leventa This publication is produced within the project “The Prospect and Development of Public Service Media: Comparative Study of PSB Development in Western Balkans in Light of EU Integration”, performed together with the University of Fribourg’s Department of Communication and Media Research DCM and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation through the SCOPES (Scientific Cooperation between Eastern Europe and Switzerland) programme. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent opinions of the Swiss National Science Foundation, University of Fribourg and Center for Social Research Analitika. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 6 2. Theoretical AND Methodological Framework 9 2.1. Contemporary Debates on PSB on the Global and EU Level 10 2.2. Key Issues Regarding PBS in Post Communist Countries and the Western Balkans 16 2.3. Methodological Framework 18 3. Country Background 19 3.1. Socio-Political and Economic Context 19 3.2. Media System 21 4. PUBLIC SERVICE Broadcasting IN Montenegro: Research FINDINGS 24 4.1. Background on PSB in Montenegro 24 4.2. Regulation of PSB 28 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games Rights Holding Broadcasters
    Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games Rights Holding Broadcasters Territories Rights Rights Holder Broadcaster Channel / URL Europe Albania TV - FTA EBU RTVSH RTV TV - Cable/Sat Eurosport Eurosport Online http://eurosport.yahoo.com Eurovision http://www.eurovisionsports.tv/olympics Andorra TV - FTA EBU France Télévisions FR2 FR3 TV - FTA RTVE LA2 TELEDEPORTE TVE 1 Online Eurosport http://eurosport.yahoo.com Eurovision http://www.eurovisionsports.tv/olympics Armenia TV - FTA EBU ARMTV ARMTV TV - Cable/Sat Eurosport Eurosport Online http://eurosport.yahoo.com Eurovision http://www.eurovisionsports.tv/olympics Austria TV - FTA EBU ORF ORF1 TV - Cable/Sat Eurosport Eurosport Online http://de.eurosport.yahoo.com Eurovision http://www.eurovisionsports.tv/olympics ORF http://sport.orf.at Belarus TV - FTA EBU TVR BTRC LAD TV - Cable/Sat Eurosport Eurosport Online TVR http://olimpicgames.tvr.by Eurosport http://eurosport.yahoo.com Eurovision http://www.eurovisionsports.tv/olympics Belgium TV - FTA EBU VRT CANVAS EEN TV - Cable/Sat Eurosport Eurosport Online http://eurosport.yahoo.com Eurovision http://www.eurovisionsports.tv/olympics RTBF http://www.rtbf.be/sport VRT http://www.sporza.be/vancouver2010 Bosnia and Herzegovina TV - FTA EBU BHRT BHT1 TV - Cable/Sat Eurosport Eurosport Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games Rights Holding Broadcasters Territories Rights Rights Holder Broadcaster Channel / URL Bosnia and Herzegovina Online Eurosport http://eurosport.yahoo.com Eurovision http://www.eurovisionsports.tv/olympics Bulgaria TV - FTA EBU BNT BNT
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Documents
    Alex Morgan et al v. United States Soccer Federation, Inc., Docket No. 2_19-cv-01717 (C.D. Cal. Mar 08, 2019), Court Docket Multiple Documents Part Description 1 3 pages 2 Memorandum Defendant's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of i 3 Exhibit Defendant's Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of La 4 Declaration Gulati Declaration 5 Exhibit 1 to Gulati Declaration - Britanica World Cup 6 Exhibit 2 - to Gulati Declaration - 2010 MWC Television Audience Report 7 Exhibit 3 to Gulati Declaration - 2014 MWC Television Audience Report Alex Morgan et al v. United States Soccer Federation, Inc., Docket No. 2_19-cv-01717 (C.D. Cal. Mar 08, 2019), Court Docket 8 Exhibit 4 to Gulati Declaration - 2018 MWC Television Audience Report 9 Exhibit 5 to Gulati Declaration - 2011 WWC TElevision Audience Report 10 Exhibit 6 to Gulati Declaration - 2015 WWC Television Audience Report 11 Exhibit 7 to Gulati Declaration - 2019 WWC Television Audience Report 12 Exhibit 8 to Gulati Declaration - 2010 Prize Money Memorandum 13 Exhibit 9 to Gulati Declaration - 2011 Prize Money Memorandum 14 Exhibit 10 to Gulati Declaration - 2014 Prize Money Memorandum 15 Exhibit 11 to Gulati Declaration - 2015 Prize Money Memorandum 16 Exhibit 12 to Gulati Declaration - 2019 Prize Money Memorandum 17 Exhibit 13 to Gulati Declaration - 3-19-13 MOU 18 Exhibit 14 to Gulati Declaration - 11-1-12 WNTPA Proposal 19 Exhibit 15 to Gulati Declaration - 12-4-12 Gleason Email Financial Proposal 20 Exhibit 15a to Gulati Declaration - 12-3-12 USSF Proposed financial Terms 21 Exhibit 16 to Gulati Declaration - Gleason 2005-2011 Revenue 22 Declaration Tom King Declaration 23 Exhibit 1 to King Declaration - Men's CBA 24 Exhibit 2 to King Declaration - Stolzenbach to Levinstein Email 25 Exhibit 3 to King Declaration - 2005 WNT CBA Alex Morgan et al v.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Journalists in Europe INDEX
    SPECIAL REPORT | NOVEMBER 2018 Demonising the media: Threats to journalists in Europe INDEX DEMONISING THE MEDIA: THREATS TO JOURNALISTS IN EUROPE ABOUT THIS REPORT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document is a survey of over 3,000 violations of THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY press freedom reported to and verified by Index on Valeria Costa-Kostritsky, Sean Gallagher, Jodie Ginsberg, Joy Hyvarinen and Paula Kennedy with contributions from Mapping Media Freedom Censorship’s media monitoring project – Mapping correspondents: Adriana Borowicz, Ilcho Cvetanoski, João de Almeida Dias, Amanda Ferguson, Dominic Hinde, Investigative Reporting Project Media Freedom – since 2014. It covers 35 European Italy, Linas Jegelevicius, Juris Kaza, David Kraft, Lazara Marinkovic, Fatjona Mejdini, Mitra Nazar, Silvia Nortes, Platform for Independent countries, comprised of the 28 European Union Journalism (P24), Katariina Salomaki, Zoltan Sipos, Michaela Terenzani, member states, 5 candidates for entry to the EU and 2 Pavel Theiner, Helle Tiikmaa, Christina Vasilaki, Lisa Weinberger ILLUSTRATIONS potential candidates for entry to the EU. The incidents Alex Green were logged to Mapping Media Freedom between 1 DESIGN Matthew Hasteley May 2014 and 31 July 2018. 2 INDEXONCENSORSHIP.ORG MAPPINGMEDIAFREEDOM.ORG DEMONISING THE MEDIA INDEX URNED IN EFFIGY. Insulted. Menaced. Spat at. Discredited by their nation’s Bleaders. Assaulted. Sued. Homes strafed with automatic weapons. Rape threats. Death threats. Assassinations. This is the landscape faced by journalists throughout Europe over the past four years. Mapping Media Freedom has documented media freedom incidents across Europe – over 3,000 were surveyed for this report – since May 2014. The information gathered shows journalists and media outlets targeted in a kaleidoscopic array by political leaders, businesses and the general public – but some key trends have emerged from the reports recorded and verified by the platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Tv Distribution Platforms
    AVAILABILITY OF EUROPEAN PSM SERVICES ON TV DISTRIBUTION PLATFORMS In most countries, DTT is essential for Public Service Media (PSM) services as it is often the only Free-to-air1 (FTA) platform, even if in some countries, penetration of satellite or cable is similar or higher. This document provides information on the availability and use of alternative distribution platforms for PSM services. This includes Free-to- view2 (FTV) and access to PSM via the open internet. Although in many countries these alternatives exist and can complement DTT, currently, they cannot replace DTT in all countries. 1. PROVISION OF FREE-TO-AIR SERVICES ON ALTERNATIVE PLATFORMS In many countries, DTT is the only distribution platform offering FTA television services. Table 1 in the Annex3 shows the current availability of PSM distribution platforms in 22 European countries. All alternatives to FTA are either only available to subscribers as part of a paid package, via “Free to View” access cards or via an internet or mobile subscription. Subscriptions clearly represent a hurdle to those who cannot afford, or do not wish to pay for, a commercial package (whether just TV, an internet connection or a combination package including both or triple play (incl. mobile subscription)). The use of access cards represents an extra burden and costs on either broadcasters or platform providers, i.e. to manage databases of eligible households, handle the cards, and provide user support. Experience shows that platform operators whose core proposition is to provide pay-TV packages are reluctant to provide Free-to-View cards and the corresponding user equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Ebu Services
    YOUR GUIDE TO EBU SERVICES 1 The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) is the world’s foremost alliance of public service media (PSM). Our mission is to make PSM indispensable. We have 115 Member organizations in 56 countries in Europe, and an additional 31 Associates in Asia, Australasia, Africa and the Americas. Our Members operate almost 2,000 television, radio and online channels and services and offer a wealth of content across other platforms. Together, they reach audiences of more than one billion people around the world, broadcasting in almost 160 languages. We are one EBU with two distinct fields of activity: Member Services and Business Services. Our Member Services strive to secure a sustainable future for public service media, provide our Members with a centre for learning and sharing, and build on our founding ethos of solidarity and cooperation to provide an exchange of world-class news, sports news, and music. Our Business Services, operating as Eurovision Services, are the media industry’s premier distributor and producer of high-quality live news, sport and entertainment with over 70,000 transmissions and 100,000 hours of news and sport every year. We return the profits of Business Services to the organization for the benefit of Members. 2 2 WELCOME TO THE EBU! As a Member, you are part of a unique community of media organizations from 56 countries that together provide a powerful voice championing and upholding the values of PSM. We are a network of like-minded people that not only share the same ideals but come together to share knowledge, ideas and inspiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Days Factsheet.Indd
    EU SUPPORT TO MEDIA IN THE WESTERN BALKANS #EUWBmedia September 2019 OVERALL EU SUPPORT 2014-2020 €20 million approx. EU REGIONAL INITIATIVES IN PLACE €11.5 million SUPPORTING PUBLIC SERVICE MEDIA BUILDING TRUST IN MEDIA €1.5M Focus on sustainable models for funding, Reinforcing media accountability EU-funded project transparent and implemented in election functioning of governing mechanisms through: partnership with bodies of Public Service Media; UNESCO supporting press councils and Regional synergies and exchanges: ethical journalism; integrated newsrooms, increasing media internal governance, including editorial guidelines, long-term €1.5M EU-funded project led ethical audits and good governance seminars; strategies; by the International Federation of strengthening media and information literacy Regional co-production of Journalists to assist RTSH, BHRT, RTK, through trainings and awareness raising campaigns. investigative stories, media content MRT, RTCG, RTS for youth and regional exchange of digitised archive materials. PROVIDING DIRECT €4M MEDIA SUPPORT EU fi nancial support scheme implemented REINFORCING JUDICIAL EXPERTISE Core and bridge funding for by the European small-scale initiatives, including Endowment for Supporting the judiciary in applying individuals and non-registered Democracy the European Court of Human organisations; Rights (ECtHR) case-law in the fi eld of freedom of expression; €2.5M Demand-driven pro-democracy support provided on a EU-funded project rolling basis for new independent media outlets; Training on
    [Show full text]
  • RTK's Financial Sustainability
    RTK’s Financial Sustainability: Finding alternatives to public broadcaster financing Introduction The Draft Law on the Kosovo Public Broadcaster was adopted in principle in the plenary session of June 29, 2011. With 64 votes in favor, 3 abstentions and none against, the Assembly has showed its interest to have a new law on the public broadcaster. However, the section of the Draft Law on the public broadcaster financing incited an extensive debate. Another vague section was the Article on the establishment of a second RTK channel in Serbian language. European Commission was interested on having the public broadcaster law adopted with urgency, thus it was expected that the law would be sent for adoption on the session of August 29, 2011. However, it did not happen, as it was considered that the draft law requires more time for revision. Public broadcaster financing was unclear since the very inception of this medium, and this draft law provides for no long-term mechanism of RTK financing. According to the draft law, RTK shall have regular financing from the state budget for a three-year transitional period, with an annual allocation of 0.7% of Kosovo Budget revenues, in addition to revenues from commercial advertisement. What after three years? The draft law provides that financing is done through license fee revenue, a regular fee payable by the citizens. However, the draft law doesn’t specify the manner in which fees will be collected or its amount. RTK has never had a long-term financing mechanism. Initially, RTK was supported with donor grants and annual budget allocations from the Kosovo Budget.
    [Show full text]
  • THROUGH WHOSE EYES DOES the RTCG REPRESENT the MONTENEGRIN REALITY? Report on the RTCG's Representation of Di Erent Social Actors in 2013 – 2015
    rec THROUGH WHOSE EYES DOES THE RTCG REPRESENT THE MONTENEGRIN REALITY? Report on the RTCG's representation of di erent social actors in 2013 – 2015 THROUGH WHOSE EYES DOES THE RTCG REPRESENT THE MONTENEGRIN REALITY? - Report on the RTCG’s representation of different social actors in 2013 – 2015 - July 2016 THROUGH WHOSE EYES DOES THE RTCG REPRESENT THE MONTENEGRIN REALITY? -Report on the RTCG’s representation of different social actors in 2013 – 2015 - Publisher: Centre for Civic Education (CCE) Library: Democracy Editor: Daliborka Uljarević Author: mr Damir Nikočević Associate on publication: Isidora Radonjić Design and production: Centre for Civic Education (CCE) Proofreading: Centre for Civic Education (CCE) ISBN 978-86-85591-74-7 COBISS.CG-ID 30928912 CONTENT Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Legal framework .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Overview of findings – 2013 ...................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of findings – 2014 .................................................................................................................... 14 Overview of findings – 2015 .................................................................................................................... 19 Conclusions and remarks
    [Show full text]