DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability Appraisal for Tandridge District Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability Appraisal for Tandridge District Council Sustainability Appraisal for Tandridge District Council Regulation 18 - Sites Consultation October 2016 Sustainability Appraisal for Tandridge District Council Regulation 18 – Sites Consultation LC-254 Document Control Box Client Tandridge District Council Sustainability Appraisal for Tandridge District Council; Regulation 18 – Report Title Sites Consultation Status FINAL Filename LC-254_Tandridge_SA Sites_13_071016RB.docx Date October, 2016 Author RB Checked ND Approved ND Front credit: View from North Downs Way near Tandridge Hill, North Downs Way Sustainability Appraisal for Tandridge District Council; Regulation 18 – Sites Consultation October 2016 LC-254_Tandridge_SA Sites_13_071016RB.docx About this report & Notes for reader Lepus Consulting Ltd (Lepus) has prepared this draft report for the range of uses taking place. The assessment was prepared the use of Tandridge District Council. There are a number of between August and September 2016 and is subject to and limitations, which should be borne in mind when considering the limited by the information available during this time. results and conclusions of this report. No party should alter or change this report whatsoever without written permission from Since preparing the appraisal Tandridge District Council have Lepus. prepared additional site-by-site ecology and landscape evidence, © Lepus Consulting Ltd which was not available for use in this appraisal. SEA and SA are tools for predicting potential significant effects. This report has been produced to assess the sustainability effects The actual effects may be different from those identified. of the Emerging Local Plan. It is not intended to be a substitute Prediction of effects is made using an evidence-based approach for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or Appropriate and incorporates a judgement. Assessment (AA). For further information on the differences between the products please see: The assessments above are based on the best available https://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/environmentalassessment_tc information, including that provided to Lepus by the Council and m9-257008.pdf information that is publicly available. No attempt to verify these Client comments can be sent to Lepus using the following secondary data sources has been made and they have assumed address. to be accurate as published. 1 Bath Street, Cheltenham Every attempt has been made to predict effects as accurately as Gloucestershire possible using the available information. Many effects will GL50 1YE depend on the size and location of development, building design Telephone: 01242 525222 and construction, proximity to sensitive receptors such as wildlife E-mail: [email protected] sites, conservation areas, flood risk areas and watercourses, and www.lepusconsulting.com © Lepus Consulting for Tandridge District Council i Sustainability Appraisal for Tandridge District Council; Regulation 18 – Sites Consultation October 2016 LC-254_Tandridge_SA Sites_13_071016RB.docx This page is deliberately blank. © Lepus Consulting for Tandridge District Council ii Sustainability Appraisal for Tandridge District Council; Regulation 18 – Sites Consultation October 2016 LC-254_Tandridge_SA Sites_13_071016RB.docx Contents 1 Int ction rodu .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of the Tandridge Local Plan ............................................................................................ 1 1.3 The Sustainability Appraisal Process ............................................................................................... 2 1.4 Appraisal Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Using this document .............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Approach to assessment ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Appraisal process .................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Geographic scale ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Impact magnitude ................................................................................................................................. 10 2.5 Assumptions and limitations to assessment ................................................................................ 11 3 Assessmen tof sites .............................................................................................................. 16 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 16 3.2 Bletchingley .............................................................................................................................................. 17 3.3 Blindley Heath ......................................................................................................................................... 21 3.4 Caterham and Whyteleafe ................................................................................................................ 25 3.5 Domewood ............................................................................................................................................. 30 3.6 Dormansland .......................................................................................................................................... 33 3.7 Felbridge .................................................................................................................................................. 36 3.8 Godstone ................................................................................................................................................. 39 3.9 Lingfield ................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.10 Oxted ........................................................................................................................................................ 46 3.11 Smallfield ................................................................................................................................................. 52 3.12 South Nutfield ........................................................................................................................................ 57 3.13 South Godstone .................................................................................................................................... 60 3.14 Tatsfield .................................................................................................................................................... 63 3.15 Warlingham ............................................................................................................................................ 65 4 Con cept Areas ........................................................................................................................ 70 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 70 4.2 Blindley Heath .......................................................................................................................................... 71 4.3 Burstow (Horne) ................................................................................................................................... 73 4.4 Copthorne ............................................................................................................................................... 75 4.5 Hobbs Industrial Estate ....................................................................................................................... 77 4.6 Lambs Business Park .......................................................................................................................... 79 4.7 Lingfield ................................................................................................................................................... 82 4.8 South Godstone .................................................................................................................................... 84 5 Mitigation Considerations and Recommendations ................................................... 86 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 86 5.2 SA Objective 1: Housing ..................................................................................................................... 86 5.3 SA Objective 2: Health ....................................................................................................................... 87 5.4 SA Objective 3: Cultural Heritage .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 6: North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog's Back ND02: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Guildford to the Mole Gap ND03: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Mole Gap to Reigate ND04: North Downs; Epsom Downs to Nonsuch Park ND05: North Downs; Banstead Woods & Downs and Chipstead Downs ND06: North Downs Scarp; Quarry Hangers to the A22 ND07: North Downs Scarp; Woldingham ND08: North Downs; Banstead & Walton Heaths December 2015 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog’s Back Local authorities: Guildford, Waverley Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape-scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Recognition of BOAs directly meets National Planning Policy Framework policy for the planning system to contribute to international commitments for halting the overall decline in biodiversity, by establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 109). Designation of BOAs in local plans will also fulfil NPPF requirements to plan for biodiversity at a landscape-scale across local authority boundaries; and identify & map components of the local ecological networks (para. 117). Explanatory BOAs identify the most important areas for wildlife conservation remaining in Surrey and each include a variety of habitats, providing for an ‘ecosystem approach’ to nature conservation across and beyond the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaldon Matters April 2017
    Chaldon Matters www.chaldonvillagecouncil.org.uk Newsletter 47 April 2017 TDC Leader Proposes New Garden Village Land to the west of Chaldon In recent press releases, Cllr Martin Fisher, expressing our anger and frustration at his - has areas of Great Landscape Value (AGLV); Leader of Tandridge District Council (TDC), failure to clearly inform us of the inclusion - has Landscape Character Areas 2015; put forward a proposal of a ‘garden village’ of the land at Chaldon as a possible location - is designated as Green Belt and the TDC as the solution to meeting the housing need. for a large development that would be so LP Green Belt Assessment confirmed that The Sites Consultation that took place at the damaging to Chaldon. it serves the purpose as defined under the end of 2016 identified two possible sites for NPPF; this garden village or extended settlement The inclusion of this land, which was not - is adjacent to the important North Downs at South Godstone and Blindley Heath. part of the ‘Sites Consultation’, completely Way National Trail; However, the recent inclusion of new undermines the Local Plan process. It raises - surrounds the Chaldon Conservation Area; sites in the updated Housing & Economic considerable fears in the local community - links two sites of Special Scientific Interest; Land Availability Assessments (HELAA), and will offer false hope to developers. - has a number of highly important grade II including land to the west of Chaldon, has Therefore, the land needs to be properly ancient buildings; raised the possibility that other locations assessed as soon as possible and either ruled - surrounds the ancient St Peter and St will be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Tandridge Open Space, Sports and Recreation Facilities Assessment: Community and Stakeholder Consultation
    Community and Stakeholder Consultation (August 2017) 0 Tandridge Open Space, Sports and Recreation Facilities Assessment: Community and Stakeholder Consultation (August 2017) Community and Stakeholder Consultation (August 2017) 1 Contents Section Title Page 1.0 Introduction 4-6 1.1 Background 1.2 The Open Space, Sports and Recreation Facilities Assessment 1.3 How Does This Report Relate to the Open Space, Sports and Recreation Facilities Assessment? 1.4 The Local Plan 1.5 Purpose of this Report (The Community and Stakeholder Needs Assessment) 2.0 General Community Consultation 7-30 2.1 Household survey 2.2 Public Health 2.3 Key Findings 3.0 Neighbouring Local Authorities and /Parish Councils 31-44 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Neighbouring Authorities – cross boundary issues 3.3 Parish Councils 3.4 Key Findings 4.0 Parks, Green Spaces, Countryside, and Rights of Way 45-67 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Review of policy/strategy: Wealden District and East Sussex Councils 4.3 Key Stakeholders: Strategic context and overview 4.4 Community Organisations Survey 4.5 Parks and Recreation Grounds 4.6 Allotment Provision 4.7 Natural Green Space, Wildlife Areas and Woodlands 4.8 Water Recreation 4.9 Footpaths, Cycling and Equestrian Provision 4.10 Key Findings 5.0 Play and Youth facility provision 68-76 5.1 Review of Policy and Strategy 5.2 Strategic Stakeholders 5.3 Views from Local Play and Youth Organisations 5.4 Key Findings Community and Stakeholder Consultation (August 2017) 2 6.0 Concluding remarks 77 Glossary of Terms Term Meaning AGLV Area of Great Landscape
    [Show full text]
  • Chaldon Walks Chaldon Residents Walk All Their Footpaths Regularly Twice a Year and Have Done So Most Years Since the 1920S
    1 Chaldon Walks Chaldon residents walk all their footpaths regularly twice a year and have done so most years since the 1920s. There are six walks of varying lengths designed to cover the network of official paths and bridleways within the parish. This is an attempt to preserve that tradition and provide some interesting detail. Put together by Liz Bonsall with contributions from Adele Brand and Madeline Hutchins. October 2020. Chaldon Walk 6 – Junction Roffes Lane/Chaldon Common Road 2.3 miles via Willey Farm Lane, Grubs Wood, Stanstead Road, White Hill, (steep slopes and steps down to Spring Bottom Lane and steep slopes back), Willey Park Farm, North Downs Way, Rook Farm and Rook Lane, Village Hall. (steep slopes can be avoided). Liz Bonsall October 2020 2 This walk starts at the junction of Chaldon Common Road with Roffes Lane. Walk up Willey Farm Lane, a rough concrete track. At the end of the row of houses there are open fields to the right. In 1970 these were proposed as a new site for Eothen School but turned down on the grounds of inaccessibility. At the junction, before you follow the track to your left, see the information board there at the top of the hill, provided by Chaldon Village Council in 2017. At this point on a clear day you can see the London skyline. With your back to the board, Willey Park Farm house can be glimpsed from here, and looking towards it, on the right hand side of the track, in the trees, is the site of one of Willey Farm’s ancient ponds.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trips for 2018 Contents Click Item to Go Directly to Page Contacts
    Number 65 SURREY Skipper Spring/Summer 2018 47 field trips for 2018 Contents click item to go directly to page Contacts......................2 Dates ........................10 Quiz ........................21 Chairman ....................3 Egg Hunts ..................11 Robert Byron ..............22 Annual Report ..............4 Email Appeal ..............12 WCBS ........................23 50th Anniversary ..........5 Field Trips..............13-16 Transect data..........24-29 Steve Wheatley ............6 Branch Website ..........17 iRecord ....................30 Big Butterfly Count ........6 Social Media ..............17 New Members ............31 Malcolm Bridge ............7 Transects ..................18 Membership................32 Surrey Atlas ................7 White-letter Hairstreak 19 Garden Moth Scheme ....32 Small Blue Project ........8 Weather Watch............20 Moths ..................33-35 Oaken Wood ..............10 Photo Show ................21 Back-page Picture ........36 Butterfly Conservation Saving butterflies, moths Surrey & SW London & our environment Surrey Skipper 2 Spring 2018 Branch Committee LINK Committee emails Chair: Simon Saville (first elected 2016) 07572 612722 Conservation Adviser: Ken Willmott (1995) 01372 375773 County Recorder: Harry Clarke (2013) 07773 428935, 01372 453338 Field Trips Organiser: Mike Weller (1997) 01306 882097 Membership Secretary: Ken Owen (2015) 01737 760811 Moth Officer: Paul Wheeler (2006) 01276 856183 Skipper Editor & Publicity Officer: Francis Kelly (2012) 07952 285661, 01483
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Technical Note Longsdon Way, Caterham, Surrey
    Ecological Technical Note Longsdon Way, Caterham, Surrey September 2019 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This Technical Note has been prepared by CSA Environmental on behalf of Croudace Homes Ltd in relation to land at Longsdon Way, Caterham, Surrey (hereafter referred to as, ‘the Site’), centred around Ordnance Survey grid reference TQ 348 551). 1.2 The Site (c.3.96 ha) is being promoted for allocation for residential housing (originally for up to c.60 units). Representations have been made to Tandridge District Council (TDC) for inclusion of a site allocation within the Tandridge ‘Our Local Plan 2033’, however the Site was excluded from further consideration as a result of Regulation 19 consultation. Whilst the evidence base previously provided by TDC confirmed that the Site is not performing Green Belt purposes and as such could be considered for release from the Green Belt, concerns were subsequently raised following publication of their ecology evidence base which identified the Site as ‘ecologically unsuitable’ due to the potential for the Site to be restored to calcareous grassland as S41 (NERC Act, 2006) habitat. The validity of this decision is explored and evaluated within this Technical Note, in light of revised proposals for development of a reduced scale (up to c.40 units), see Development Plan (Ref DES/929/600) provided in Appendix E. 1.3 A review of the Local Plan evidence base documents has been undertaken, and an assessment of the conclusions drawn against site based survey and biological records data commissioned by the applicant,
    [Show full text]
  • North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 6: North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog's Back ND02: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Guildford to the Mole Gap ND03: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Mole Gap to Reigate ND04: North Downs; Epsom Downs to Nonsuch Park ND05: North Downs; Banstead Woods & Downs and Chipstead Downs ND06: North Downs Scarp; Quarry Hangers to the A22 ND07: North Downs Scarp; Woldingham ND08: North Downs; Banstead & Walton Heaths September 2019 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog’s Back Local authorities: Guildford, Waverley Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Realising BOA aims will contribute to UK commitments to halt biodiversity declines, and their recognition directly meets current National Planning Policy Framework policy to plan strategically for the enhancement of the natural environment; to be achieved by providing net gains for biodiversity and establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 170). Designation of BOAs also fulfils NPPF requirements to identify, map and safeguard components of wider ecological networks, and areas identified for habitat management, enhancement, restoration or creation (para.
    [Show full text]
  • Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan
    Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan Design Guidelines FINAL REPORT November 2018 Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan Quality information Project role Name Position Action summary Signature Date Qualifying body Various Caterham, Chaldon Review 19.07.2018 and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan Director / QA Ben Castell Technical Director 30.08.2018 Researcher Luis Juarez Urban and Landscape Research, site 30.08.2018 Design visit, drawings Simon Jenkins Graziano Di Gregorio Project Coordinator Mary Kucharska Project Coordinator Review 22.10.2018 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. © 2018 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. 2 AECOM Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1. About this document ......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer - Handbook
    Volunteer - handbook - Version 2 | May 2017 Contents Volunteer Handbook 3. Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust 4. About Surrey Wildlife Trust 5. What is volunteering 5. What do volunteers do? 5. Who can volunteer? 5. Why volunteer with us? 5. Do volunteers have to be members? 5. Do you need prior experience? 6. Volunteer roles & responsibilities 6. Our responsibilities to you 7. Important information 7.Registration and induction 7. Being a Trust representative 7. Expenses and timesheets 7. Supervision and support 8. Training and development 8. Voluntary Conservation Trainees 8. Policies and procedures 10. The social aspect 11. Managed sites 12. Site list Contact details The Volunteer Development Team, Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0JN © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2016 Registered Charity No 208123, Surrey Wildlife Trust Ltd. is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no. 645176, VAT No 791.3799.78 Scrub control, Water Vole, Grass Snake, Jon Hawkins; Dormouse, Tom Marshall; Muddy hands, Julie Norman; Heather, Tom Marshall; Grassland survey, woodland survey, family pond dipping, Matthew Roberts; Bee Orchid, P. Precey; River survey, Karen Lloyd; Box checking, Lizzie Wilberforce; Otter, Elliott Neep Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust! Now you have signed up to volunteering, you will be part of a network of over 1000 volunteers who help the Trust to make a real difference for nature You could be saving threatened habitats… ….Or surveying protected species You could be inspiring a child to try pond dipping… ….Or raising awareness in your local community Volunteers are an important and valued part of Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT) and this is your chance to make a real contribution to local conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Research & Monitoring Framework
    Research & Monitoring Framework Mike Waite Living Landscapes, Policy & Research Manager Version 1. November 2019 1 | Surrey Wildlife Trust Research & Monitoring Framework Written and produced by Surrey Wildlife Trust Registered Charity No. 208123 © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2019 Coveer image: Ockham Common, Mike Waite 2 | Surrey Wildlife Trust Research & Monitoring Framework Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Why monitoring matters 6 2. Monitoring & research in Surrey 8 2.1 What is monitoring? 8 2.2 Habitat distribution baselining 8 2.3 Habitat condition assessment 9 2.4 Habitat connectivity in Surrey 10 2.5 Species monitoring & research in Surrey 10 2.5.1 Plants, lichens and fungi 11 2.5.2 Invertebrates 12 2.5.3 Vertebrates 13 2.6 People engagement monitoring & research 14 2.7 Management & capture of data 14 3. Monitoring principles & methods 16 3.1 Some basic principles 16 3.2 Overview of available monitoring methods 17 3.2.1 Habitats & vegetation communities 17 3.2.2 Species and species assemblages 17 3.2.3 Habitat connectivity 18 3.2.4 People engagement metrics 18 3.2.5 New & emerging monitoring techniques 19 4. Implementation Plan 20 KPI Bio.01: SSSI favourable condition status 21 KPI Bio.02: Sites of Nature Conservation Importance 21 KPI Bio.03: Priority habitat creation & restoration 23 KPI Bio.04: Priority species recovery 24 KPI Bio.05: Priority habitat connectivity 26 People Engagement KPI (PE.01-05) 27 5. Research opportunities 28 5.1 Biodiversity-related research 28 5.2 Engagement-related research 29 6. References
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Survey of Earthworks at Willey Park Farm, Chaldon, Surrey Parish
    1 Analytical survey of earthworks at Willey Park Farm, Chaldon, Surrey Parish: Chaldon District: Tandridge NGR: TQ 3200 5390 Date of survey: 2013 – 2015 Report Author: Judie English MCIfA, PhD, FSA May 2020 2 Contents Geology, topography and present land use 3 Historical and Archaeological Background 4 The survey 11 Discussion 15 Acknowledgements 16 Primary Sources 16 References 16 Distribution 17 3 Geology, topography and present land use (figures 1a and 1b) The area under study lies at the top of the scarp slope of the North Downs in the parish of Chaldon, at between 180 and 230mOD, with a central NGR of TQ 3200 5390. The area is south- facing with a relatively gentle slope which steepens to the south. The southern portion of the fields lies on Holywell Nodular Chalk Formation and New Pit Chalk Formation with that portion on the plateau of the downs lying on Lewes Nodular Chalk Formation, Seaford Chalk Formation and Newhaven Chalk Formation covered by a superficial deposit of Clay with Flints. Most of the area under survey is in private ownership as part of Willey Park Farm and is mainly used for horse pasturing but the western field is a Site of Special Scientific Interest and Nature Reserve called Quarry Hangers now under the management of Surrey Wildlife Trust. It includes a mixture of species-rich chalk grassland, scrub and woodland, and supports a 4 number of plants which are rare or local in Surrey, as well as local invertebrates and is open to the public. The northern boundary of the area is marked by the North Downs Way.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Wildlife Trust
    Registered Charity Number: 208123 Registered Company Number: 00645176 SURREY WILDLIFE TRUST TRUSTEES’ REPORT AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2016 SURREY WILDLIFE TRUST TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT For the year ended 31 March 2016 _________________________________________________________________________________ Contents LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 2 STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................. 3 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE AND OVERVIEW ............................................................................................. 4 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 STRATEGIC REPORT ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF SURREY WILDLIFE TRUST .............. 17 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES INCORPORATING AN INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT .......................................................................................................................................... 19 BALANCE SHEETS ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]