36% NICKEL-IRON ALLOY for Low Temperature Service
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Invar, Established a New Standard in the Way Precise Surveying Measurements Were Made, Both in Reliability and Accuracy
I N VA R The Breakthrough for a Low Expansion Alloy he discovery of the low expansion alloy, Invar, established a new standard in the way precise surveying measurements were made, both in reliability and accuracy. It became the first successful attempt to produce a metal alloy exhibiting a nearly zero coefficient of thermal expansion. In 1889, James Riley of Glasgow, Scotland, brought before the Iron and Steel Institute his investigations into the making of an alloy through a series of tests which combined up to 49 percent nickel with iron. Seven years later, in 1896, Charles Edouard Guillaume, a Swiss-born metallurgist and employee with the International Bureau of Weights and Measures near Paris, began looking specifically for an alloy to be used for surveyors’ wires that would not noticeably change when exposed to temperature variations. While experimenting with nickel contents between 30 and 60 percent, Guillaume discovered the coefficient of expansion at room temperature was lowest when mixing a nickel content of 36 percent with 64 percent iron. Since his new alloy exhibited the least amount of thermal expansion, and because Guillaume considered it invariable, it quickly became known as “Invar”. In 1920, Guillaume was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of Invar >> By Jerry Penry, PS Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • Vol. 9 No. 10 • Copyright 2012 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com The Sokkia BIS30 3-meter Invar bar code leveling staff in use during a high precision survey. Image courtesy of Sokkia Corporation. Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • Vol. 9 No. -
The Development of the Periodic Table and Its Consequences Citation: J
Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia The Development of the Periodic Table and its Consequences Citation: J. Emsley (2019) The Devel- opment of the Periodic Table and its Consequences. Substantia 3(2) Suppl. 5: 15-27. doi: 10.13128/Substantia-297 John Emsley Copyright: © 2019 J. Emsley. This is Alameda Lodge, 23a Alameda Road, Ampthill, MK45 2LA, UK an open access, peer-reviewed article E-mail: [email protected] published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.com/substantia) and distributed under the terms of the Abstract. Chemistry is fortunate among the sciences in having an icon that is instant- Creative Commons Attribution License, ly recognisable around the world: the periodic table. The United Nations has deemed which permits unrestricted use, distri- 2019 to be the International Year of the Periodic Table, in commemoration of the 150th bution, and reproduction in any medi- anniversary of the first paper in which it appeared. That had been written by a Russian um, provided the original author and chemist, Dmitri Mendeleev, and was published in May 1869. Since then, there have source are credited. been many versions of the table, but one format has come to be the most widely used Data Availability Statement: All rel- and is to be seen everywhere. The route to this preferred form of the table makes an evant data are within the paper and its interesting story. Supporting Information files. Keywords. Periodic table, Mendeleev, Newlands, Deming, Seaborg. Competing Interests: The Author(s) declare(s) no conflict of interest. INTRODUCTION There are hundreds of periodic tables but the one that is widely repro- duced has the approval of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and is shown in Fig.1. -
The Periodic Table of Elements
The Periodic Table of Elements 1 2 6 Atomic Number = Number of Protons = Number of Electrons HYDROGENH HELIUMHe 1 Chemical Symbol NON-METALS 4 3 4 C 5 6 7 8 9 10 Li Be CARBON Chemical Name B C N O F Ne LITHIUM BERYLLIUM = Number of Protons + Number of Neutrons* BORON CARBON NITROGEN OXYGEN FLUORINE NEON 7 9 12 Atomic Weight 11 12 14 16 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SODIUMNa MAGNESIUMMg ALUMINUMAl SILICONSi PHOSPHORUSP SULFURS CHLORINECl ARGONAr 23 24 METALS 27 28 31 32 35 40 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 POTASSIUMK CALCIUMCa SCANDIUMSc TITANIUMTi VANADIUMV CHROMIUMCr MANGANESEMn FeIRON COBALTCo NICKELNi CuCOPPER ZnZINC GALLIUMGa GERMANIUMGe ARSENICAs SELENIUMSe BROMINEBr KRYPTONKr 39 40 45 48 51 52 55 56 59 59 64 65 70 73 75 79 80 84 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 RUBIDIUMRb STRONTIUMSr YTTRIUMY ZIRCONIUMZr NIOBIUMNb MOLYBDENUMMo TECHNETIUMTc RUTHENIUMRu RHODIUMRh PALLADIUMPd AgSILVER CADMIUMCd INDIUMIn SnTIN ANTIMONYSb TELLURIUMTe IODINEI XeXENON 85 88 89 91 93 96 98 101 103 106 108 112 115 119 122 128 127 131 55 56 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 CESIUMCs BARIUMBa HAFNIUMHf TANTALUMTa TUNGSTENW RHENIUMRe OSMIUMOs IRIDIUMIr PLATINUMPt AuGOLD MERCURYHg THALLIUMTl PbLEAD BISMUTHBi POLONIUMPo ASTATINEAt RnRADON 133 137 178 181 184 186 190 192 195 197 201 204 207 209 209 210 222 87 88 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 FRANCIUMFr RADIUMRa RUTHERFORDIUMRf DUBNIUMDb SEABORGIUMSg BOHRIUMBh HASSIUMHs MEITNERIUMMt DARMSTADTIUMDs ROENTGENIUMRg COPERNICIUMCn NIHONIUMNh -
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930083526 2020-06-17T20:21:50+00:00Z GOVT. DOC. 1JlJf;, tEcH NFSS NICA,1. ~NO lil? , oor---------------------------------------------------~~~------~ L{) r N NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS TECHNICAL NOTE 2758 / WEAR AND SLIDING F RICTION PROPERTIES OF NICKEL ALLOYS SUITED FOR CAGES OF HIGH-TEMPERATURE R OLLING- CONTACT BEARINGS I - ALLOYS RETAIN ING MECHANICAL PROPER TIES TO 600 0 F By R obert L. Johnson, Max A. Swikert and Edmond E. Bisson Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory Cleveland, Ohio Washington August 1952 lY NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS TECHNICAL NOTE 2758 WEAR AND SLIDING FRICTION PROPERTIES OF NICKEL ALLOYS SUITED FOR CAGES OF HIGH-TEMPERATURE ROLLING-CONTACT BEARINGS I - ALLOYS REI'AINING MECHANICAL PROPERTIES TO 6000 F \. By Robert L. Johnson, Max A. SWikert, and Edmond E. Bisson SUMMARY Wear and sliding friction properties of a number of nickel alloys operating against hardened SAE 52100 steel were stUdied. These alloys include "L" nickel, wrought monel, cast monel, cast modified "H" monel, cast "s" monel, Invar, Ni-Resist 3, and Nichrome V. Some of the alloys studied may be useful as possible cage materials for high-temperature, high-speed bearings for aircraft turbines or for bearings to operate in corrosive media . Desirable operating properties of all the materials could be associated with the development on the rider surface of a naturally formed film of nickel oxide . On the basis of wear and friction proper ties, Ni-Resist 3, modified "H" monel, and Invar were the best materials studied in this investigation although they did not perform as well as nod!.llar iron. -
The Nickel Silvers
Copper Development Association The Nickel Silvers Design Data and Applications 1965 Please note this publication is provided as an archive copy. The information given may therefore not be current. The Nickel Silvers Design Data and Applications 1965 Copper Development Association Copper Development Association is a non-trading organisation sponsored by the copper producers and fabricators to encourage the use of copper and copper alloys and to promote their correct and efficient application. Its services, which include the provision of technical advice and information, are available to those interested in the utilisation of copper in all its aspects. The Association also provides a link between research and user industries and maintains close contact with other copper development associations throughout the world. Website: www.copperinfo.co.uk Email: [email protected] Copyright: All information in this document is the copyright of Copper Development Association Disclaimer: Whilst this document has been prepared with care, Copper Development Association can give no warranty regarding the contents and shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising out of its use Contents Contents ...............................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................2 -
Copper Alloys
THE COPPER ADVANTAGE A Guide to Working With Copper and Copper Alloys www.antimicrobialcopper.com CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................. 3 PREFACE Conductivity .....................................4 Strength ..........................................4 The information in this guide includes an overview of the well- Formability ......................................4 known physical, mechanical and chemical properties of copper, Joining ...........................................4 as well as more recent scientific findings that show copper has Corrosion ........................................4 an intrinsic antimicrobial property. Working and finishing Copper is Antimicrobial ....................... 4 techniques, alloy families, coloration and other attributes are addressed, illustrating that copper and its alloys are so Color ..............................................5 adaptable that they can be used in a multitude of applications Copper Alloy Families .......................... 5 in almost every industry, from door handles to electrical circuitry to heat exchangers. II. Physical Properties ..................... 8 Copper’s malleability, machinability and conductivity have Properties ....................................... 8 made it a longtime favorite metal of manufacturers and Electrical & Thermal Conductivity ........... 8 engineers, but it is its antimicrobial property that will extend that popularity into the future. This guide describes that property and illustrates how it can benefit everything from III. Mechanical -
Alloys: Making an Alloy
Inspirational chemistry 21 Alloys: making an alloy Index 2.3.1 2 sheets In this experiment, students make an alloy (solder) from tin and lead and compare its properties to those of pure lead. Equipment required Per pair or group of students: ■ About 2 g lead ■ About 2 g tin ■ Crucible ■ Pipe clay triangle ■ Bunsen, tripod and heatproof mat ■ Spatula ■ Carbon powder – 1 spatula per student ■ Tongs ■ 2 sand trays or sturdy metal lids ■ Sand ■ Access to a balance ■ Eye protection. Health and safety The most likely incident in this experiment is a student burning themselves so warn them that the equipment will be hot. Pouring molten metal can be hazardous if you are not sure how to use tongs correctly – it would be worth demonstrating how to use them safely. Some tongs in schools do not grip well. Every pair must be checked before the start of the experiment. Eye protection should be worn. Lead is a toxic metal. If it is heated for too long or too high above its melting point it could start to give off fumes. Ensure that the laboratory is well ventilated, warn students against breathing in the fumes given off by their sample during the experiment and tell them to heat the metals no longer than is necessary to get them to melt. 22 Inspirational chemistry Results Hardness testing should show clearly that the alloy is harder than the pure lead. The alloy can be used to scratch the lead convincingly. The lead does not leave a mark on the alloy. (Students may need to be reminded how to do this simple test – just try to scratch one metal with the other.) The density of the alloy should be less than that of the lead, but this test is fairly subjective. -
Special-Purpose Nickel Alloys
© 2000 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org ASM Specialty Handbook: Nickel, Cobalt, and Their Alloys (#06178G) Special-Purpose Nickel Alloys NICKEL-BASE ALLOYS have a number of meet special needs. The grades considered in ganese, and copper, a 0.005% limit on iron, and unique properties, or combinations of proper- this section include the following: a 0.02% limit on carbon. This high purity re- ties, that allow them to be used in a variety of sults in lower coefficient of expansion, electri- specialized applications. For example, the high • Nickel 200 (99.6% Ni, 0.04% C) cal resistivity, Curie temperature, and greater resistivity (resistance to flow of electricity) and • Nickel 201 (99.6% Ni, 0.02% C maximum) ductility than those of other grades of nickel heat resistance of nickel-chromium alloys lead • Nickel 205 (99.6% Ni, 0.04% C, 0.04% Mg) and makes Nickel 270 especially useful for to their use as electric resistance heating ele- • Nickel 233 (see composition in table that fol- some electronics applications such as compo- ments. The soft magnetic properties of lows) nents of hydrogen thyratrons and as a substrate nickel-iron alloys are employed in electronic • Nickel 270 (99.97% Ni) for precious metal cladding. devices and for electromagnetic shielding of computers and communication equipment. Iron- Composition limits and property data on sev- eral of these grades can be found in the article nickel alloys have low expansion characteris- Resistance Heating Alloys tics as a result of a balance between thermal ex- “Wrought Corrosion-Resistant Nickels and pansion and magnetostrictive changes with Nickel Alloys” in this Handbook. -
Definition of Design Allowables for Aerospace Metallic Materials
Definition of Design Allowables for Aerospace Metallic Materials AeroMat Presentation 2007 Jana Jackson Design Allowables for Aerospace Industry • Design for aerospace metallic structures must be approved by FAA certifier • FAA accepts "A-Basis" and "B-Basis" values published in MIL-HDBK-5, and now MMPDS (Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization) as meeting the regulations of FAR 25.613. OR • The designer must have sufficient data to verify the design allowables used. Design Allowables for Aerospace Industry • The FAA views the MMPDS handbook as a vital tool for aircraft certification and continued airworthiness activities. • Without the handbook, FAA review and approval of applicant submittals becomes more difficult, more costly and less consistent. • There could be multiple data submission for the same material that are conflicting or other instances that would require time consuming analysis and adjudication by the FAA. What is meant by A-Basis, B-Basis ? S = Specification Minimum • B-Basis: At least 90% of population A = T equals or exceeds value with 95% 99 confidence. B = T90 • A-Basis: At least 99% of population equals or exceeds value with 95% confidence or the specification minimum when it is lower. Æ Mechanical Property (i.e., FTY, et al) What is the MMPDS Handbook? • Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization • Origination: ANC-5 in 1937 (prepared by Army- Navy-Commerce Committee on Aircraft Requirements) • In 1946 the United States Air Force sanctioned the creation of a database to include physical and mechanical properties of aerospace materials. • This database was created in 1958 and dubbed Military Handbook-5 (or MIL-HDBK-5 for short). -
Properties of Gold-Nickel Alloy Brazed Joints in High Temperature Materials
Properties of Gold-Nickel Alloy Brazed Joints in High Temperature Materials Professor Jakob Colbus University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, West Germany and Karl Friedrich Zimmermann Degussa, Wolfgang, West Germany The usefulness of gold-nickel alloys as brazing media in the aero- engine, electronic, nuclear power and spacecraft industries is illustrated by data on the corrosion and oxidation resistance of joints made with these alloys in various heat-resistant materials and on their resistance to fracture under the influence of static, dynamic and impact loads in tests at subzero, normal and elevated temperatures. Gold solders have been in use for many years, Brazing temperature in the range 900 to 1000°C. especially in the jewellery trade and in dentistry. Ability to make joints that retain their strength The solders used in the fabrication of jewellery and ductility at elevated temperatures. contain silver, copper, cadmium, and zinc, which are Good resistance to oxidation and corrosion. added to ensure that the colour and the gold content All these requirements can be satisfied by several of a given solder matches the corresponding charac- alloys in the gold-nickel system, whose constitutional teristics of the soldered article. The solders used in diagram is shown in Figure 1. The 18 per cent dental practice often contain other precious metals nickel-gold alloy is the most suitable one to serve as a such as iridium, palladium, and platinum introduced brazing medium. Its melting point of 950°C is the to increase their corrosion resistance, the most important property of solders of this kind. In both these applications the soldering is done in air with WEIGHT PERCENT NICKEL the aid of a gas torch and a suitable flux. -
Mechanical Properties of Electroformed Nickel Cobalt Alloys
Mechanical Properties of Electroformed Nickel Cobalt Alloys B. Stein, P. Jaeger and C. Przybyla, NiCoForm, Inc., Rochester, New York, USA Abstract Hardness was measured on ½" - thick stainless steel blocks plated with at least 0.02" of Ni-Co on a Mechanical properties of nickel-cobalt alloys (0-10% Rockwell superficial hardness tester (Wilson Co) electroformed with low internal stress in Instruments Mod. 3 JS) with a 15kg load. The sulfamate-based solutions were investigated in as average of three readings was taken for each data point deposited and heat treated conditions. It was in tensile and hardness tests. demonstrated that alloy properties can be modified by selecting deposition conditions and alloy composition. Both foil samples and hardness test blocks were Recommendations on alloy selection are made based electroformed at 1-3 A/Dm2 in two proprietary Ni-Co on application requirements. alloy electroforming chemistries, one designed for enhanced deposit hardness, the other - for high tensile The higher strength and hardness of nickel-cobalt alloy strength. Deposit internal stress was measured directly electrodeposits compared to nickel stimulates their in the plating tanks as described elsewhere [1], while increasing use in electroforming and as engineering tensile and hardness samples were being coatings. Many advanced electroformed products such electroformed. Tensile and hardness tests were as bellows, contacts, optical and nanofluidic molds can performed on samples in the as plated and heat treated only be produced consistently if the deposits’ (2 hours at the set temperature) conditions. properties are well understood and properly controlled Representative foil samples were chemically analyzed by the process engineer. -
A Simple Theory of the Invar Effect in Iron-Nickel Alloys
1 A simple theory of the Invar effect in iron-nickel alloys François Liot1 & Christopher A. Hooley2 1Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; 2Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA), School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS, U.K. Certain alloys of iron and nickel (so-called ‘Invar’ alloys) exhibit almost no thermal expansion over a wide range of temperature1–3. It is clear that this is the result of an anomalous contraction upon heating which counteracts the normal thermal expansion arising from the anharmonicity of lattice vibrations. This anomalous contraction seems to be related to the alloys’ magnetic properties, since the effect vanishes at a temperature close to the Curie temperature. However, despite many years of intensive research, a widely accepted microscopic theory of the Invar effect in face-centered-cubic Fe-Ni alloys is still lacking. Here we present a simple theory of the Invar effect in these alloys based on Ising magnetism, ab initio total energy calculations, and the Debye-Grüneisen model4. We show that this theory accurately reproduces several well known properties of these materials, including Guillaume’s famous plot1 of the thermal expansion coefficient as a function of the concentration of nickel. Within the same framework, we are able to account in a straightforward way for experimentally observed deviations from Vegard’s law2, 3, 5, 6. Our approach supports the idea that the lattice constant is governed by a few parameters, including the fraction of iron-iron nearest-neighbour pairs.