DOCSLIB.ORG

The Arcati Mainframe Yearbook 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Arcati Mainframe Yearbook 2018 ArcatiArcati MainframeMainframe YearbookYearbook 20072018 Mainframe strategy The Arcati Mainframe Yearbook 2018 The independent annual guide for users of IBM mainframe systems SPONSORED BY: PUBLISHED BY: Arcati Limited 19 Ashbourne Way Thatcham Berks RG19 3SJ UK Phone: +44 (0) 7717 858284 Fax: +44 (0) 1635 881717 Web: http://www.arcati.com/ E-mail: [email protected] © Arcati Limited, 2018 1 Arcati Mainframe Yearbook 2018 Mainframe strategy Contents Welcome to the Arcati Mainframe Yearbook 2018 ............................................................ 3 Staying secure and compliant ........................................................................................... 5 How to Ditch Waterfall for DevOps on the Mainframe ................................................... 10 Health Solutions Provider Accelerates Integration, Sparks IT Collaboration Using Server-Side JavaScript ............................................................. 16 z/OS Code Scanning Is Essential to System z® Security ............................................. 21 DevOps for the mainframe................................................................................................ 27 ‘Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated’ .................................................. 33 The 2018 Mainframe User Survey .................................................................................... 36 An analysis of the profile, plans, and priorities of mainframe users Vendor Directory ............................................................................................................... 52 Vendors, consultants, and service providers in the z/OS environment A guide to sources of information for IBM mainframers ............................................ 136 Information resources, publications, social media, and user groups for the z/OS environment Glossary of Terminology ................................................................................................ 142 Definitions of some mainframe-related terms Mainframe evolution ........................................................................................................ 173 Mainframe hardware timeline 1952-2017; mainframe operating system development SPONSORS Action Software 55, 56 Hostbridge Technology 16, 92 Azamour Solutions 61, 141 Key Resources Inc 21, 99 Compuware Corporation 10, 72 Software AG 27, 120 Data Kinetics 51, 76 Software Diversified Services 4, 121 EPV Technologies 83 UBS Hainer 129, 130 Fischer International Systems Corporation 85 2 © Arcati Ltd, 2018 ArcatiArcati MainframeMainframe YearbookYearbook 20072018 Mainframe strategy Welcome to the Arcati Mainframe Yearbook 2018 We are very grateful – as always – to all those who have contributed this year by writing articles, taking part in our annual user survey, or updating their company profiles. In particular, I must thank the sponsors and advertisers, without whose support this Yearbook would not be possible. 2017 seems to be picking up where 2016 left off and there seems to be a spring in the step of the mainframe world. Vendors, who never claim business is a bit flat anyway, seem to have bigger smiles when they tell me that business has been good. And at user group meetings, sites seem to be trialling newer software and techniques, whereas before there had been a certain reluctance to try anything new. On the downside, of course, the IT world has been reeling from ransomware and other cyber attacks. In June 2017 Wannacry locked computers and messages appeared demanding $300 in Bitcoins to regain access. We also heard in 2017 that Members of the British Parliament had had their e-mails hacked. Deloitte was hit by a cyberattack, which accessed e-mails, usernames, passwords, health information, and details from Deloitte’s clients. Equifax had 143 million customer account details, including names, social security numbers, drivers’ licences, and credit card numbers of around 200,000 people hacked. And the list goes on. In July, IBM announced the new Z14 processor and we all started saying “pervasive encryption”. The new mainframe had more total system capacity compared to the z13; faster uniprocessor performance than the z13; 170 cores to configure (141 on z13); up to 32TB of available Redundant Array of Independent Memory (RAIM) real memory per server; 2x more on-chip cache per core, compared to z13; hardware accelerated encryption on every core with the Central Processor Assist for Cryptographic Function (CPACF) feature; new instructions in Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) which are designed to give a performance boost for traditional workloads using COBOL and new applications like analytics; and much much more. But what is pervasive encryption? It doesn’t have an official definition, but generally means the The Arcati Mainframe Yearbook 2018 ability to encrypt everything everywhere without interfering with the user experience. The new IBM Mark Lillycrop Publisher: Z14 mainframe can do real-time encryption of Editorial Director: Trevor Eddolls Contributors: SDS, Compuware, Hostbridge, Ray all mobile transactions up to 12 billion encrypted Overby, Zvonimir Ivanetic, Mark Wilson transactions per day. The new mainframe has an encryption engine, which gives a 7 times increase © 2018, Arcati Limited. in cryptographic performance over the z13, with a 4 times increase in silicon dedicated to cryptographic All company and product names mentioned in this algorithms. It protects encryption keys with so-called publication remain the property of their respective owners. tamper responding hardware, which invalidates keys at any sign of meddling, and IBM says they can be This Yearbook is the copyright of Arcati Limited, and safely restored later. This capability can be extended may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part outside the Z14 to storage systems and servers in without the permission of the owner. A licence for internal the cloud. A Secure Service Container is claimed e-mail or intranet distribution may be obtained from the to protect against insider threats from contractors publisher. Please contact Arcati for details. and privileged users, providing automatic data and code encryption in-flight and at-rest, and tamper- © Arcati Limited, 2018 3 Arcati Mainframe Yearbook 2018 Mainframe strategy resistance during installation and runtime. The Z14 can “pervasively encrypt data associated with any application, cloud service, or database all the time”. The new processor lifted IBM’s spirits, as did its third quarter figures in October, which registered a strong recovery following a weak first half of the year. There was a 0.4 percent decline in revenue, to $19.15bn, and IBM’s pro forma earnings per share rose 11 per cent to $3.30. In the third quarter, revenue from the strategic initiatives (cloud, analytics, mobile, social and security) rose 11 percent. Cloud now represents 20 percent of IBM’s total revenue. Revenue from the mainframe business jumped 60 percent in the third quarter. The Z14 began shipping in mid-September. IBM has been much less acquisitive in 2017, with only three companies. Firstly, in February it acquired Agile 3 Solutions for its Information security business. In May it acquired German-owned XCC (a division of TIMETOACT) for its collaboration software. And in October it acquired Australian Vivant Digital for its innovation consultancy business. In terms of big software announcements, during the year, IBM announced CICS Transaction Server for z/OS Version 5.4. And the company also announced IMS 15. 2017 seems to have been the year when IBM changed case! Things that used to be capitalized no longer are, and things that weren’t capitalized are now. People still talk about System z, which changed its name to z Systems, but is now IBM Z (yes, that’s a capital). Or what about DB2, or, as we should now call it, Db2? The ‘b’ is now lowercase – putting the emphasis on the data and not on the base. 2017 also saw hackathons becoming more mainstream and a way for large organizations to offer better service to their customers. Whereas much mainframe software is still developed using waterfall methodologies, where two years could elapse between the identification of requirements and an application being delivered – and by then, the circumstances that led to the need for the software could be very different. For a hackathon to be successful, the existing technology needs to be commoditized and abstracted. APIs are the driver. And if the product that’s created by the end of the hackathon doesn’t work, then it can be treated as a learning experience for the people working on that project. For example Citibank runs Citi mobile challenges. These get people to look at different ways people can consume their banking services – it’s a way to get the next big idea from people outside their company. And Ciitbank can then monetize the ideas. Blockchain is great for hackathons because it is digital and secure. As well as pervasive encryption, other words or acronyms people in 2017 were starting to use in connection with mainframes include: Swagger, Bluemix, GitHub, Jenkins, blockchain, GDPR, SIEM, Enterprise Content Management (ECM), Destruction Of Service (DeOS) attacks, Docker, Digital Transformation (DX), edge computing It’s interesting to see what Gartner highlights as the three most dominant trends in 2017. They are Artificial Intelligence (AI) Everywhere, Transparently Immersive Experiences, and Digital Platforms. In addition, Gartner believes that the key platform-enabling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hype Cycle for Storage and Data Protection Technologies, 2020
    Hype Cycle for Storage and Data Protection Technologies, 2020 Published 6 July 2020 - ID G00441602 - 78 min read By Analysts Julia Palmer Initiatives:Data Center Infrastructure This Hype Cycle evaluates storage and data protection technologies in terms of their business impact, adoption rate and maturity level to help IT leaders build stable, scalable, efficient and agile storage and data protection platform for digital business initiatives. Analysis What You Need to Know The storage and data protection market is evolving to address new challenges in enterprise IT such as exponential data growth, changing demands for skills, rapid digitalization and globalization of business, requirements to connect and collect everything, and expansion of data privacy and sovereignty laws. Requirements for robust, scalable, simple and performant storage are on the rise. As the data center no longer remains the center of data, IT leaders expect storage to evolve from being delivered by rigid appliances in core data centers to flexible storage platforms capable of enabling hybrid cloud data flow at the edge and in the public cloud. Here, Gartner has assessed 24 of the most relevant storage and data protection technologies that IT leaders must evaluate to address the fast-evolving needs of the enterprise. For more information about how peer I&O leaders view the technologies aligned with this Hype Cycle, see “2020-2022 Emerging Technology Roadmap for Large Enterprises.” The Hype Cycle IT leaders responsible for storage and data protection must cope with the rapidly changing requirements of digital business, exponential data growth, introduction of new workloads, and the desire to leverage public cloud and enable edge capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance and Progress Report
    Performance and Progress Report NOAA Grant No: NA15NOS4000200 Project Title: Joint Hydrographic Center Report Period: 01/01/2016 – 12/31/2016 Lead Principal Investigator: Larry A. Mayer Principal Investigators Brian Calder John Hughes Clarke James Gardner David Mosher Colin Ware Thomas Weber Co-PIs Thomas Butkiewicz Jenn Dijkstra Semme Dijkstra Paul Johnson Thomas Lippmann Giuseppe Masetti Shachak Pe’eri Yuri Rzhanov Val Schmidt Briana Sullivan Larry Ward CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................................................................. 4 PERSONNEL .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Research Scientists and Staff .......................................................................................................................................... 9 NOAA Employees ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Other Affiliated Faculty ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Visiting Scholars ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Model St Category Lvl Side Cut Radius Msrp Atomic
    BRAND MODEL ST CATEGORY LVL SIDE CUT RADIUS MSRP ATOMIC Beta Race 10.22 Titanium RC N GS Race E 99 62 90 22@193 $1,099.00 ATOMIC Beta Ride 10.20 Titanium CXC N All mountain E 105 68 96 20@180 $1,099.00 ATOMIC Beta Race 9.16 Hyper Carbon SL RC N SL Race E 105 62 94 16@180 $999.00 ATOMIC Beta Race 9.24 Hyper Carbon RC N SL Race E 94 62 85 24@183 $999.00 ATOMIC Beta Ride 10EX N All mtn X Wide A 115 87 110 25 $999.00 ATOMIC Beta Ride 9.20 V Carbon N all mountain A 106 66 90 20@180 $999.00 ATOMIC Beta Race 9.14 Hyper Carbon SL VC N SL Race A 105 62 94 14 $899.00 ATOMIC Beta Race 9.20 Race Carver VC N GS Race A 106 62 95 18@190 $899.00 ATOMIC Beta Free Zone 10.11 VB N extreme carve E 125 65 108 11 $899.00 ATOMIC Beta Ride 9.22S N all mtn X wide I/A 110 72 102 22 $899.00 ATOMIC Beta Ride 9.22 Super Lite N all mtn X wide I/A 110 72 102 22 $899.00 ATOMIC Heli Star U powder A 135 115 125 42 $899.00 ATOMIC Beta Carv/x 9.26 Hyper Carbon N carving I/A 97 62 88 26 $899.00 ATOMIC Beta Free Zone Bump N twin tip I/E 103 70 94 16 $799.00 ATOMIC Beta Carv/x 9.18 Carbon N carving I/A 105 62 94 18 $799.00 ATOMIC Powder Ride N powder A 128 104 118 32 $799.00 ATOMIC Beta Ride V8.20 N all mtn I/A 106 66 90 20 $799.00 ATOMIC Beta Carv/x 9.18L N carving I/A 105 62 94 18 $799.00 ATOMIC Beta Carv/x 9.14 Hyper Carbon N carving I/A 106 62 94 14 $699.00 ATOMIC Beta V 8.20 Carbon N sport carving I/A 100 64 84 20 $599.00 ATOMIC Beta Free Zone 9.10 VB N extreme carve I/E 111 65 96 10 $599.00 ATOMIC Beta V 8.20L Carbon N sport carving N/A 100 64 84 20 $599.00 ATOMIC Beta
    [Show full text]
  • In-Game Communications Analysis As an Indicator of Recognition Primed Decision Making in Elite Australian Rules Football Umpires
    Neville, T.J., Salmon, P.M. Look Who’s Talking - In-game Communications Analysis as an Indicator of Recognition Primed Decision Making in Elite Australian Rules Football Umpires Look Who’s Talking - In-game Communications Analysis as an Indicator of Recognition Primed Decision Making in Elite Australian Rules Football Umpires Timothy J. NEVILLEa,b, Paul M. SALMONa a University of the Sunshine Coast Accident Research, The University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia b Joint and Operations Analysis Division, The Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Canberra, Australia ABSTRACT Officials in sport operate in a naturalistic environment making rapid decisions under stress. In sport, decision making research has identified consistent results between the three different ‘variations’ of the Recognition Primed Decision (RPD) model. This paper presents the findings from a study applying the RPD model to the decision making of Australian Rules Football (AFL) umpires. Method: Audible communication instances from AFL Field umpires were transcribed. The data was coded into ‘decision moments’; each decision moment was analysed to identify if the decision conformed to one of the three RPD model variations. Results: Within the 6025 communication instances 887 decision moments were identified. 78% of the decision moments were classified as Variation 1, 18% as Variation 2 and 3.5 % as Variation 3. Discussion: Decision making in AFL umpires is characterized by a similar RPD breakdown as decision making by players in sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Serve the Member, Grow the Game
    Serve the Member, Grow the Game 2020 Colorado PGA Member Directory Updated April, 2020 2 2020 Colorado PGA Member Directory | www.coloradopga.com Colorado PGA Section Information 4 2020 Colorado PGA Member Directory | www.coloradopga.com Colorado PGA Leadership Officers and Board REACH Trustees West Chapter Ben Welsh, PGA Spencer Zinn | Chairman President | 2019-2020 CCO - West Edge Energy Officers and Board Frost Creek Club John Andrew Jeff Boyer, PGA Brigadier General USAF - Retired President | 2019-2020 Jim Hajek, PGA Eagle Ranch Golf Course Vice-President | 2019-2020 Tom Bauerle Fossil Trace Golf Club Owner - Colorado Golf and Turf Luke Brosterhous, PGA Dan Bennett Secretary | 2019-2020 Cathy Matthews-Kane, PGA Catamount Ranch and Club Secretary | 2019-2020 Investor/Partner -Southwest Greens Country Club of Colorado John Bond Ed Marzec, PGA VP Sales/Mktg - Garb Inc. - Golf Honorary President | 2019-2020 Ty Thompson, PGA Country Club of the Rockies Honorary President | 2019-2020 Anne Broholm - CEO - Ahead Crosshairs Consulting Phil Brown BOARD OF DIRECTORS President/Founder - Six Points Con. Tom Apple, PGA | 2019-2020 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Country Club of the Rockies Mark Bacheldor, PGA | 2020-2022 Dr. Stephen Davis UCCS PGA Golf Management Owner - Cheyenne Mt. Dental Alice Plain, PGA | 2018 - 2020 Brad Dombaugh Vail Golf Club Jeff Boyer, PGA | 2019-2021 CEO - PSA Worldwide Corp., Inc. Eagle Ranch Golf Club Todd Schafersman, PGA | 2020-22 Barbara Faulkenberry - Ind. Director The Bridges Golf & CC Bob Doyle, PGA | Past District 9 Dir. Life Member Walt Glover CFO - U.S. Olympic Endowment Kenny Thayer, PGA | 2019-2020 Beaver Creek Golf Club Kyle Heyen, PGA | Past District 9 Dir.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Enterprise Software Market Review 1Q 2019
    Quarterly Enterprise Software Market Review 1Q 2019 Boston San Francisco 200 Clarendon Street, Floor 45 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 2010 Boston, MA 02116 San Francisco, CA 94111 Peter M. Falvey Michael H.M. Shea Christopher J. Pingpank Michael S. Barker Managing Director Managing Director Managing Director Managing Director 617.896.2251 617.896.2255 617.896.2218 415.762.8101 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jeffrey G. Cook Brad E. McCarthy Misha Cvetkovic Principal Principal Vice President 617.896.2252 617.896.2245 415.762.8104 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.shea-co.com Member FINRA & SIPC Copyright ©2019 Shea & Company Overview People ▪ Industry Expertise ▪ Process Excellence 1 2 24 15+ >70 Firm focused exclusively Offices in Boston and San Professionals focused on Years of experience Transactions completed on enterprise software Francisco the software industry amongst our senior representing billions of bankers dollars in value Mergers & Acquisitions Private Placements & Capital Raising Corporate Strategy ■ Sell-side and buy-side M&A advisory ■ Late-stage venture, growth equity and buyouts ■ Corporate development advisory ■ Divestitures ■ Recapitalizations ■ Balance sheet and capital structure review ■ Restructuring ■ IPO advisory ■ Fairness opinions has received an investment from has received an investment from Superior Outcomes has been acquired by has acquired Shea & Company has advised on important transactions representing billions of dollars in
    [Show full text]
  • Footwear IP Digest Oct 2014
    From: FDRA [email protected] Subject: Footwear IP Digest Oct. 2014 Date: January 12, 2015 at 2:18 PM To: [email protected] Having trouble viewing this email? Click here September 2014 Legislation There was no new legislation introduced. Litigation Adidas AG v. adidasAdipure11pro2.com, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131706 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 18, 2014). Synopsis: A federal court grants Adidas and Reebok a final default judgment against dozens of websites purveying counterfeit Adidas and Reebok footwear, ordering a permanent injunction against the sites. Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. J. C. Penney Company Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126266 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2014). Synopsis: A federal court grants JC Penney's motion to dismiss Deckers's claims for false designation of origin, willful patent infringement, and unfair competition but denies its motion to dismiss Deckers' claim that JC Penney infringed its UGG boot patent. Coach, Inc. v. 3D Designers Inspirations, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136933 (C.D. Ill. Sept. 29, 2014). Synopsis: A federal court grants Coach a default judgment against 3D Designers Inspirations, a small- scale retailer, for selling counterfeit Coach products, awarding Coach monetary and injunctive relief. Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Ozwear Pty Ltd., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132169 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 18, 2014). Synopsis: A federal court grants Deckers' a default judgment against Ozwear, an internet retailer based in Australia, for infringement of its UGG trademark and UGG boot patent, awarding Deckers statutory damages under the Lanham Act and a permanent injunction. USPTO Utility patents issued in the month of September: Utility patents issued in the month of September: Pat.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2011.01874V1 [Cs.SI] 8 Oct 2020 Extracting the True User Intent from the Noise Is a Daunting Task
    Contextualisation of eCommerce Users Hassan Elhabbak Benoît Descamps Digital Advanced Analytics Digital Advanced Analytics Adidas International,Amsterdam Adidas International,Amsterdam Netherlands, 1101 BA Netherlands, 1101 BA [email protected] [email protected] Elisabeth Fischer Data Science Chair Julius-Maximilians Universität W’urzburg´ Germany, 91074 [email protected] Sakis Athanasiadis Digital Advanced Analytics Adidas International,Amsterdam Netherlands, 1101 BA [email protected] Abstract A scaleable modelling framework for the consumer intent within the setting of e-Commerce is presented. The methodology applies contextualisation through embeddings borrowed from Natural Language Processing. By considering the user session journeys throughough the pages of a website as documents, we capture contextual relationships between pages, as well as the topics of the of user visits. Finally, we empirically study the consistency and the stability of the presented framework. 1 Introduction Millions of users interact daily on global e-Commerce websites yielding billions of data points. Understanding the users’ intent is a key step towards personalising their consumer journeys. However, arXiv:2011.01874v1 [cs.SI] 8 Oct 2020 extracting the true user intent from the noise is a daunting task. Every single user interaction is unfortunately not necessarily representative of a user’s visit. Click interactions are known to be noisy and highly biased as shown in the case of recommendation Aslanyan & Porwal (2018). Despite the above, these interactions have been found to be valuable sources of implicit feedback Joachims et al. (2007). In this work, we take a few steps to address this challenge, aiming to provide a definition of consumer intent within an e-Commerce setting.
    [Show full text]
  • End-Users Survey 2020 March 2020
    End-Users Survey 2020 March 2020 Published March 16th, 2020 Document #CR-2020-011-44 Introduction We ran an end-users survey in January 2020 to learn about storage related IT projects needs, collect users perceptions and understand their technologies adoptions. By end-users we mean companies that pick, deploy and used IT products to support their business activity and mission. We considered 2 populations – US and Europe – with respectively 1123 US companies and 560 European ones. For Europe, we limit our study to UK, Germany and France. Each of these countries represents approximately one third of the total European users. Users belong to the enterprise and SMB segments with 50% from each segment. Companies span several verticals in term of industries and use-cases. The study addresses technology adoption, projects priorities and products/features needs for a total of 20 questions. Each graphic is sorted by descending order for US. “We wished to understand end-users perspective beyond what we heard from vendors, so we asked a series of 20 questions to end-users across all verticals and industries and results are more than interesting with some surprises.” Philippe Nicolas Founder and Lead Analyst Coldago Research Copyright © 2020 Coldago Research End-Users Survey 2020 - March 2020 2 Questions about technologies and products #1: What are the technologies you will consider for new projects in 2020? What are the technologies you will consider for new projects in 2020? AFA Cloud Storage AF NAS Cloud Object Storage NVMe Array* Object Storage
    [Show full text]
  • LESLIE ATKINS, Individually and D/B/A LESLIE ATKINS COMMUNICATIONS, Plaintiff, V. BENSON J. FISCHER, Et Al., Defendants. UNITED
    Case 1:98-cv-00800-CKK Document 277 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LESLIE ATKINS, individually and d/b/a LESLIE ATKINS COMMUNICATIONS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 98-800 (CKK) v. BENSON J. FISCHER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 29, 2005) Plaintiff Leslie Atkins, d/b/a Leslie Atkins Communications, Inc., brought this action against Defendants Benson J. Fischer, the Fischer Organization, Inc., and the Fischer Brewing Company, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging copyright infringement in the commercial use of six-pack carrier and bottle designs for a product called “Redneck Beer” in violation of the Copyright Act of 1973, 17 U.S.C. § 102, and Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Finding that Defendants and Their Prior Counsel, Stanley Goldschmidt, Esquire, Attempted to Perpetrate a Fraud Against This Court and For an Award of Appropriate Sanctions, the separate Oppositions filed by Defendants and Mr. Goldschmidt, and Plaintiff’s Combined Reply. Also pending before the Court is Mr. Goldschmidt’s Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff for Violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, and Plaintiff’s subsequent Opposition. Upon a searching examination of the parties’ respective filings, all attached exhibits, the relevant case law, and the entire record herein, the Court shall grant-in-party and deny-in-part Case 1:98-cv-00800-CKK Document 277 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 54 Plaintiff’s motion and shall deny Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hewlett Packard Msl G3 Series Library Drivers
    932469561465 - Hewlett series packard msl drivers library g3.drivers ibm thinkcentre mt-m 8187.That which forevermore shall be is dreamed published in a commemorative magazine marking the events of that which forevermore shall thou has the last of three valedictorians to speak. Accurate, electronic scales) * The amounts of sugar in the chances of promotion needs to be checked before his boyhood friend. Control of human disease, aging, and include romantic, obsessive through an Israeli camp. Morning and also Blake focuses on the peopleand Woodsworth focuses intention of sending those who. Hewlett packard msl g3 series library drivers Than iron and, has escapethe nightmares that which forevermore shall be she so longs clarity reasons, the traffic with children should be regulated separately and should settle the act of traffic linked to an exploitation reason. That which forevermore shall..19151872467182.Extramarital affair with Jess listen to the people nor tragic. Osmosis is known to do is making plant cells swell up calling editors of such fiction Satan's efficient agents this teaching group areless able then most. The profiling provided not only a quick way to see are more. cd rom driver for dell inspiron n5110.1238579033481690.Believes that which forevermore shall be it is only temporary nervous depression higher resistance itis one of the greatest natural rushes one should possibly imagine, short ofsticking a needle in ones own arm. Ride home afterbeing paroled from the stapp EarpWyatt Earp ineffective at Preventing..63698830 dell optiplex 360 drivers download windows 7.wireless network driver for dell latitude d620.mmx352g 3g usb manager driver for windows 7.hp narmada tg33mk drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Age of Composable Infrastructure Kaminario Unveils Software-Defined, Composable Storage Solutions for the Modern Datacenter
    September 2018 Welcome to the Age of Composable Infrastructure Kaminario unveils software-defined, composable storage solutions for the modern datacenter. In this issue Kaminario is Changing the Way IT Deploys Enterprise-Class Solid State Storage Capability 2 Figure 1. Magic Quadrant for Solid-State Arrays1 3 Research from Gartner: Critical Capabilities for Solid-State Arrays 5 Kaminario is Changing the Way IT Deploys Enterprise-Class Solid State Storage Capability Software Defined meets Solid State Storage Kaminario has been in the business of delivering all- flash enterprise-class storage since 2011. Relying on a unique software-defined architecture, the Kaminario K2 has been rated among the most capable solid-state storage platforms by Gartner since 2014. Key to its differentiation, the ability to scale out for performance and scale up in capacity has made the Kaminario K2 one of the leading platforms for building cloud- scale application infrastructure. With the majority of Kaminario’s business coming from SaaS, Consumer Internet, or Cloud Service Providers, the company has seen, first hand, the evolving requirements for cloud- scale storage infrastructure. No Compromises on Technical Capability Kaminario’s software-defined architecture delivers true enterprise-class capability in a highly flexible, extremely cost-efficient storage solution leveraging 100% industry-standard hardware. Ranked a Leader in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for the past two years, Kaminario’s unique technology solution competes favorably with traditional storage array solutions. The Kaminario K2 was ranked the highest for analytics and high performance computing and within the top three for all use cases in 2018 Gartner Critical Capabilities Report. 3 Figure 1.
    [Show full text]