WHO Should Declare Climate Change a Public Health Emergency
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BMJ 2020;368:m797 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m797 (Published 31 March 2020) Page 1 of 3 Analysis BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.m797 on 30 March 2020. Downloaded from ANALYSIS HEALTH IN THE ANTHROPOCENE WHO should declare climate change a public health emergency OPEN ACCESS Rapid and potentially irreversible climate change poses a direct threat to global public health. Andrew Harmer and colleagues argue that WHO should recognise this in the same way as global threats from specific diseases Andrew Harmer senior lecturer in global health 1, Ben Eder medical doctor 2, Sophie Gepp medical student 3, Anja Leetz consultant 4, Remco van de Pas senior research fellow in global health policy 5 1Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; 2People’s Health Movement, London, UK; 3Berlin, Germany; 4German Alliance for Climate Change, Berlin, Germany; 5Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium http://www.bmj.com/ Anthony McMichael first established the link between climate environment,” and the planet is now experiencing total change and human health in the 1990s.1 In a distinguished career environmental change.5 Furthermore, the constitution allows that established him as a leading authority on the health impacts WHO’s executive board “to take emergency measures within of climate change, he repeatedly asked whether we understood the functions and financial resources of the Organisation to deal the profound significance of climate change for global health.2 with events requiring immediate action... and undertake studies Were we to ask that question today, as we should, the answer and research the urgency [of those events]” (article 28, i).6 The on 29 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. would be: We do, but we are failing to act quickly enough or Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported in 2018 at sufficient scale.3 that we could have as few as 11 years in which to prevent the One way to stimulate action is for the World Health world from warming beyond 1.5°C, a temperature threshold Organization to declare climate change a public health that, if breached, will have serious consequences for global 7 emergency of international concern. Several voices have already health. called for this step. At the opening plenary of the World Health The International Health Regulations incorporate a multihazard Assembly in Geneva in May 2019, the editor of the Lancet, perspective on health emergencies that enables WHO to assist Richard Horton, urged member states and WHO secretariat to countries to: “prepare for and respond to a wide range of public “declare a planetary emergency.”4 A couple of days later, during health events” resulting from conflict, technological hazard, a side event on air pollution, climate change, oceans, and health and natural disasters.8 However, the regulations use a very sponsored by the Swedish government, the minister of health narrow definition of a health emergency. Specifically, a public for the Seychelles, Jean Paul Adam, argued forcefully that: “we health emergency of international concern is “an extraordinary have to recognise that climate change is a public health event which is determined ... to constitute a public health risk emergency at the international level.” We examine how WHO to other States through the international spread of disease and could and should use the authority it derives from its constitution to potentially require a coordinated international response,”9 and the International Health Regulations to declare climate where event “means a manifestation of disease or an occurrence change an international public health emergency. that creates a potential for disease.”9 In practice, therefore, public WHO’s authority to act on climate change health emergencies have been declared only for infectious disease outbreaks, such as the recent outbreak of covid-19.10 WHO’s constitution defines health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the More than a risk factor absence of disease or infirmity.” Climate change threatens each of the elements in that definition. It also authorises WHO “to Under current WHO definitions climate change does not foster the ability to live harmoniously in a changing total constitute an event appropriate for consideration as a public Correspondence to: A Harmer [email protected] No commercial reuse: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe BMJ 2020;368:m797 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m797 (Published 31 March 2020) Page 2 of 3 ANALYSIS health emergency. Furthermore, WHO’s emergency response the form of “country profiles” for 45 countries (including six framework describes climate change as a “risk factor” that can small island states) and will be monitored closely by WHO.22 BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.m797 on 30 March 2020. Downloaded from trigger health emergencies rather than an emergency in its own With that information, the director general would seek the advice right.11 of the emergency committee, consult scientific evidence, and We argue that climate change can no longer be understood assess the risk of climate change to human health. merely as a risk factor. It is a totalising event that will, according Box 2: Stepwise approach to determining an event a public to WHO’s quantitative risk assessment, cause an additional 250 health emergency of international concern* 000 deaths between 2030 and 2050.12 This figure is an “In determining whether an event constitutes a public health emergency of underestimate because of the limited number of health conditions international concern, the Director-General shall consider: reviewed—malaria, heat exposure in elderly people, diarrhoea, • Information provided by the State Party and childhood undernutrition. Food insecurity, for example, • The decision instrument contained in Annex 2 13 could account for a further 529 000 adult deaths by 2050. • The advice of the Emergency Committee In terms of mortality, climate change will directly and indirectly • Scientific principles as well as the available scientific evidence and other lead to a higher number of deaths than all of the previous public relevant information; and health emergencies combined (box 1). Non-communicable • An assessment of the risk to human health, of the risk of international spread of disease, and of the risk of interference with international diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular stroke also cause traffic.” considerable mortality, but despite the increase in global burden, *Article 12(4) International Health Regulations, 2005. non-communicable diseases are unlikely to have the same escalation rate and health impact as climate change will have Various disease specific, climate induced events could trigger on the global population. There is clearly a need for an an international public health emergency. Article 13 of the internationally coordinated response to infectious diseases International Health Regulations puts the responsibility for the outbreaks, and we fully support the mandate of WHO to declare response on member states but, in consultation, WHO may offer public health emergencies for such events. However, given the further assistance, “including an assessment of the severity of high mortality that will result from climate change, the impact the international risk and the adequacy of control measures.” it will have on health systems, and the need to mitigate its effects In the case of increased Aedes transmitted viruses, an adequate immediately, we argue that climate change warrants similar control measure would begin with the implementation of a rapid treatment. zero emissions strategy, with the aim of limiting global warming to 1.5°C, and grounded in principles of climate justice and rights. Box 1: WHO has declared six public health emergencies of international concern14 15 Though not sufficient, as noted above it could protect one billion people from infection. 2009: H1N1 influenza—18 449 deaths http://www.bmj.com/ 2014: Ebola virus disease (west Africa)—11 310 deaths Wider definition 2014: Poliomyelitis—in 2019 there were 173 cases of wild poliovirus type 16 1 and 323 cases of circulating vaccine derived poliovirus The reality of climate change, however, creates an urgent need 2016: Zika virus disease:—as of May 2017, there were 200 000 infections 17 to revise the narrow disease-specific definition of an and 3000 congenital syndromes associated with the virus in the Americas international public health emergency. For example, the term 2018: Ebola virus disease (Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo)—1743 deaths18 “event” implies a discrete and timebound threat whereas the 19 2019: Covid-19—>20 000 deaths as of 26 March 2020 imminent health threats posed by climate change are protracted, on 29 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. chronic conditions. We therefore support a recent call for WHO to convene “review conferences” of its health regulations to Even within WHO’s restricted definition of a health emergency, consider how best to tackle health emergencies related to climate we argue that climate change satisfies the conditions of a public change.23 In relation to the covid-19 outbreak, one commentator health emergency of international concern. Increasing heat and suggested that the regulations’ “all-or-nothing approach” towards precipitation alter the range of disease vectors, increasing it in declaring an international health emergency should include a some locations while decreasing it in others. Climate change spectrum of alerts from category 1 to category 5.24 We argue thus induces “a potential for disease” by increasing the that such flexibility should extend to include threats to global conditions suitable for disease transmission. The number of public health that are not disease specific. people newly at risk of potential viral transmission by the mosquito species Aedes aegypti and A albopictus will approach The need for the regulations to embrace a broader spectrum of one billion within this century.20 This includes dengue virus, for global public health threats is most evident in the context of which global vectorial capacity is increasing “in step” with small island developing states.