Lewisham LCF Rule Book
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Core Strategy
APPENDIX 2 AREA PEN PORTRAITS 1 Beckenham Copers Cope & Kangley Bridge 2 Bickley 3 Bromley Common 4 Chislehurst 5 Clock House, Elmers End & Eden Park 6 Cray Valley, St Paul's Cray & St. Mary Cray 7 Crofton and Farnborough 8 Crystal Palace, Penge & Anerley 9 Hayes 10 Keston 11 Mottingham 12 Shortlands, Park Langley & Pickhurst 13 West Wickham & Coney Hall Places within the London Borough of Bromley Ravensbourne, Plaistow & Sundridge Mottingham Beckenham Copers Cope Bromley Bickley & Kangley Bridge Town Chislehurst Crystal Palace Cray Valley, St Paul's Penge and Anerley Cray & St. Mary Cray Shortlands, Park Eastern Green Belt Langley & Pickhurst Clock House, Elmers Petts Wood & Poverest End & Eden Park Orpington, Ramsden West Wickham & Coney Hall & Goddington Hayes Crofton & Farnborough Bromley Common Chelsfield, Green Street Green & Pratts Bottom Keston Darwin & Green Belt Biggin Hill Settlements Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. © Crown copyright and database 2011. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100017661. BECKENHAM COPERS COPE & KANGLEY BRIDGE Character The introduction of the railway in mid-Victorian times saw Beckenham develop from a small village into a town on the edge of suburbia. The majority of dwellings in the area are Victorian with some 1940’s and 50’s flats and houses. On the whole houses tend to have fair sized gardens; however, where there are smaller dwellings and flatted developments there is a lack of available off-street parking. During the later part of the 20th century a significant number of Victorian villas were converted or replaced by modern blocks of flats or housing. Ten conservation areas have been established to help preserve and enhance the appearance of the area reflecting the historic character of the area. -
The Socialist Issue 867
The Socialist issue 867 Socialist Party | Print The Labour Party, Militant and 'infiltration' In fury at the popularity of Jeremy Corbyn's Labour leadership campaign, right wing politicians and media alike have been referring to 'infiltration' of the Labour Party by Militant supporters. Militant was the predecessor of the Socialist Party - whose supporters in the past were members of the Labour Party. This has not been the case for decades. In the 1980s and early 1990s some of our members were witch-hunted out of the Labour Party and Militant became a banned organisation. Labour's structures were changed to try to prevent the influence of socialist ideas. Militant supporters led the heroic struggle of Liverpool City Council, which won millions of pounds of funding back from the Thatcher government and built 5,000 homes, six nursery schools and created more than 6,000 jobs. It was Militant supporters who organised the anti-poll tax movement, through the mass non-payment of 18 million people, which defeated that tax and brought down Thatcher. In a whole number of other campaigns - from forcing the shutdown of the headquarters of the racist British National Party, to leading a strike of 250,000 school students which defeated the threat to remove benefits from 16 and 17 year olds - Militant worked both within and beyond the structures of the Labour Party to organise fighting working class campaigns. These re-printed articles look back at some aspects of this history. What was the Labour Party and how did it change? Extracts from a Socialist Party pamphlet written in 2001 Historically the Labour Party was a 'capitalist-workers' party'. -
Grasmere Court, Westwood Hill, London, SE26 £325,000 - £350,000 £350,000 Leasehold
Grasmere Court, Westwood Hill, London, SE26 £325,000 - £350,000 £350,000 Leasehold Share of freehold ( Extended lease Modern fitted kitchen length ) Contemporary three piece bathroom Two double bedrooms suite Purpose built apartment Separate W/C Bright and spacious throughout Free off street parking Excellent decorative order throughout Short walk to Crystal Palace Park 2, Lansdowne Road, Croydon, London, CR9 2ER Tel: 0330 043 0002 Email: [email protected] Web: www.truuli.co.uk Grasmere Court, Westwood Hill, London, SE26 £325,000 - £350,000 £350,000 Leasehold Vendor Comments: "When I began my property search (over 14 years ago), I quickly realised that I couldn’t afford a two bedroom flat in North London. Having explored a few areas in South London, I found my dream flat on the borders of Lewisham, Southwark and Bromley. The flat has two double bedrooms, two storage cupboards, a nice sized lounge and kitchen. It was redecorated (painting/new laminate floors) in Nov 19, while the kitchen was renovated in the summer of 2017. There is access to a communal garden that is shared with Torrington Court but if you fancy larger green spaces, a maze, dinosaurs and a lake, then Crystal Palace Park is a 10min walk. If you fancy somewhere more quieter, then Wells Park and Dulwich Woods are close by. The location is fantastic as there are great transport links, which makes commuting for work or social events really easy. There are several mainline stations that are either a 10-15 min walk or a bus ride away. These are Sydenham & Penge West (for London Bridge, East & West Croydon, Victoria and Highbury & Islington), Crystal Palace (Highbury & Islington, Beckenham Junction, West Croydon, Clapham Junction and Victoria), Sydenham Hill & Penge East (Victoria, Herne Hill and Blackfriars). -
Appendix B List of Site Applicable to the PSPO. All Carriageways
Appendix B List of site applicable to the PSPO. All carriageways, adjoining footpaths and verges in the London Borough of Bromley. All pedestrian areas. All car parks and public vehicle parking areas maintained by the London Borough of Bromley. All alleys, public walks, passageways, bridleways and rights of way that are not in private ownership within the London Borough of Bromley. Equipped playgrounds Alexandra Recreation Ground, Alexandra Road, Penge SE20 Betts Park, Croydon Road, Penge SE20 Biggin Hill Recreation Ground, Church Road, Biggin Hill Blake Recreation Ground, Pine Avenue, West Wickham Burham Close Play Area, Burham Close, Penge SE20 Cator Park, Aldersmead Road, Beckenham Charterhouse Green, Charterhouse Road, Orpington Chelsfield Open Space, Skibbs Lane, Chelsfield Chislehurst Recreation Ground, Empress Drive, Chislehurst Church House Gardens Recreation Ground, Church Road, Bromley Churchfields Recreation Ground, Playground Close, Elmers End Coney Hall Recreation Ground, Addington Road, West Wickham Crease Park, Village Way, Beckenham Croydon Road Recreation Ground, Croydon Road, Beckenham Crystal Palace Park, Thicket Road, Penge SE20 Cudham Lane North Recreation Ground, Cudham Lane North, Green Street Green Cudham Lane South Recreation Ground, Cudham Lane South, Cudham Downe Recreation Ground, High Elms Road, Downe Edgebury Open Space, Imperial Way, Chislehurst Eldred Drive Playground, Eldred Drive, St Mary Cray Elmers End Recreation Ground, Shirley Crescent, Elmers End Farnborough Hill Open Space, High Street, Farnborough -
Tory Modernisation 2.0 Tory Modernisation
Edited by Ryan Shorthouse and Guy Stagg Guy and Shorthouse Ryan by Edited TORY MODERNISATION 2.0 MODERNISATION TORY edited by Ryan Shorthouse and Guy Stagg TORY MODERNISATION 2.0 THE FUTURE OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY TORY MODERNISATION 2.0 The future of the Conservative Party Edited by Ryan Shorthouse and Guy Stagg The moral right of the authors has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a re- trieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. Bright Blue is an independent, not-for-profit organisation which cam- paigns for the Conservative Party to implement liberal and progressive policies that draw on Conservative traditions of community, entre- preneurialism, responsibility, liberty and fairness. First published in Great Britain in 2013 by Bright Blue Campaign www.brightblue.org.uk ISBN: 978-1-911128-00-7 Copyright © Bright Blue Campaign, 2013 Printed and bound by DG3 Designed by Soapbox, www.soapbox.co.uk Contents Acknowledgements 1 Foreword 2 Rt Hon Francis Maude MP Introduction 5 Ryan Shorthouse and Guy Stagg 1 Last chance saloon 12 The history and future of Tory modernisation Matthew d’Ancona 2 Beyond bare-earth Conservatism 25 The future of the British economy Rt Hon David Willetts MP 3 What’s wrong with the Tory party? 36 And why hasn’t -
Planning Application Design & Access Statement Van-0387
PLANNING APPLICATION DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT VAN-0387 53 PERRY VALE, FOREST HILL, LONDON, SE23 2NE SEPTEMBER 2018 1.0 Contents VAN-0387 – 53 Perry Vale, Forest Hill, SE23 2NE, London Borough of Lewisham Design and Access Statement, July 2018 1.0 Contents 1 2.0 Introduction 2 3.0 Site analysis and Current Building 5 4.0 Description of the proposal 7 5.0 Use and Layout 10 6.0 Heritage Statement 12 7.0 Planning History and Policies 15 8.0 Architectural Character and Materials 15 9.0 Landscaping and Trees 19 10.0 Ecology 19 11.0 Extract, Ventilation and Services 20 12.0 Cycle Storage and Refuse 20 13.0 Sustainability and Renewable Energy Technology 21 14.0 Access & Mobility Statement 21 15.0 Transport, Traffic and parking Statement 22 16.0 Acoustics 22 17.0 Flood Risk 22 18.0 Statement of Community Engagement 23 19.0 Conclusion 24 1 2.0 Introduction VAN-0387 – 53 Perry Vale, Forest Hill, SE23 2NE, London Borough of Lewisham Design and Access Statement, July 2018 This application submission is prepared by db architects on behalf of Vanquish Iconic Developments for the site at 53 Perry Vale, Forest Hill, SE23 2NE. Vanquish are a family-run business and have been creating urban industrial interior designed developments for many years now across South East London. "We are a firm believer that property development should be creative, not made with basic materials to fit the standard criteria of a build. This is reflected in our interiors and exteriors of each finished development. -
354 Penge – Beckenham – Bromley
354 Penge–Beckenham–Bromley 354 Mondays to Fridays PengeCrookedBillet 0557 0617 0635 0653 0710 0727 0745 0804 0824 0845 0905 0925 1105 1124 1424 1442 AnerleyTownHall 0600 0620 0638 0656 0714 0731 0751 0810 0830 0851 0910 0929 1109 1128 1428 1447 BirkbeckStation 0603 0623 0641 0659 0717 0735 0755 0814 0834 0855 0914 0933 Then 1113 1132 Then 1432 1451 ClockHouseStation 0607 0627 0645 0704 0722 0740 0800 0819 0839 0900 0919 0938 every 1118 1137 every 1437 1456 BeckenhamWarMemorial(HighSt.) 0609 0629 0647 0706 0724 0743 0803 0823 0843 0903 0922 0941 20 1121 1140 20 1440 1459 BeckenhamHighSt.Marks&Spencer 0611 0631 0649 0709 0727 0747 0807 0827 0847 0907 0926 0945 mins. 1125 1144 mins. 1444 1503 FarnabyRoadRavensbourneAvenue 0616 0636 0655 0715 0733 0754 0814 0834 0854 0914 0933 0952 until 1132 1151 until 1451 1511 BromleyMarketSquare 0620 0640 0659 0719 0738 0759 0819 0839 0859 0919 0938 0957 1137 1156 1456 1516 BromleyNorthStation 0622 0642 0702 0722 0741 0802 0822 0842 0902 0922 0941 1000 1140 1159 1459 1519 PengeCrookedBillet 1501 1721 1741 1801 1821 1840 1858 1916 1936 1956 2016 2046 2116 2146 &&16 0016 AnerleyTownHall 1506 1726 1746 1806 1826 1844 1902 1920 1940 2000 2020 2049 2119 2149 &&19 0019 BirkbeckStation 1510 Then 1730 1750 1810 1830 1848 1906 1924 1944 2004 2023 2052 2122 2152 &&22 Then 0022 ClockHouseStation 1515 every 1735 1755 1815 1835 1853 1911 1929 1948 2008 2028 2057 2126 2156 &&26 every 0026 BeckenhamWarMemorial(HighSt.) 1519 20 1739 1759 1818 1837 1855 1913 1931 1950 2010 2030 2059 2128 2158 &&28 30 0028 BeckenhamHighSt.Marks&Spencer 1523 mins. -
New Labour, Globalization, and the Competition State" by Philip G
Centerfor European Studies Working Paper Series #70 New Labour, Globalization, and the Competition State" by Philip G. Cemy** Mark Evans" Department of Politics Department of Politics University of Leeds University of York Leeds LS2 9JT, UK York YOlO SDD, U.K Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] • Will also be published in Econonry andSocitD' - We would like to thank the Nuffield Foundation, the Center for European Studies, Harvard University,and the Max-Planck-Institut fur Gesellschaftsforshung, Cologne, for their support during the writing of this paper. Abstract The concept of the Competition State differs from the "Post-Fordist State" of Regulation Theory, which asserts that the contemporary restructuring of the state is aimed at maintaining its generic function of stabilizing the national polity and promoting the domestic economy in the public interest In contrast, the Competition State focuses on disempowering the state from within with regard to a range of key tasks, roles, and activities, in the face of processes of globalization . The state does not merely adapt to exogenous structural constraints; in addition, domestic political actors take a proactive and preemptive lead in this process through both policy entrepreneurship and the rearticulation of domestic political and social coalitions, on both right and left, as alternatives are incrementally eroded. State intervention itself is aimed at not only adjusting to but also sustaining, promoting, and expanding an open global economy in order to capture its perceived -
In 1918, the Labor Party Had Adopted a Constitution Containing What
Labor Nationalizes the Heights 1 Excerpt from The Commanding Heights by Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw, 1998 ed., pp. 25-27. Copyright © 1998 by Daniel A. Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw. Reprinted by permission of Simon & Schuster, Inc., N.Y. All rights reserved. In 1918, the Labor Party had adopted a constitution containing what became the famous Clause IV, which, in language written by Sidney Webb, called for "common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange." But what were these words to mean in practical terms? The answer came during World War II. One evening in 1944, a retired railway worker named Will Cannon, drawn back into the workforce to help in the marshaling yard, happened to drop by a local union meeting in Reading, not far from London. In the course of the meeting he decided to propose a motion calling for "nationalization," which was approved by the local. The motion won national attention, and the Labor Party ended up adopting it in December 1944. Will Cannon's motion would have a powerful global echo. In July 1945, Labor came into power totally committed to nationalization and determined to conquer the "commanding heights" of the economy, having borrowed the term from Lenin by the mid-1930s. In their quest for control of the commanding heights after World War II, the Laborites nationalized the fragmented coal industry, which provided 90 percent of Britain's energy at the time. They did the same to iron and steel, railroads, utilities, and international telecommunications. There was some precedent for this even in the British system; after all, it was Winston Churchill himself who, as first lord of the Admiralty in 1911, had purchased a controlling government stake in what became British Petroleum in order to ensure oil supply for the Royal Navy. -
The Crystal Palace
The Crystal Palace The Crystal Palace was a cast-iron and plate-glass structure originally The Crystal Palace built in Hyde Park, London, to house the Great Exhibition of 1851. More than 14,000 exhibitors from around the world gathered in its 990,000-square-foot (92,000 m2) exhibition space to display examples of technology developed in the Industrial Revolution. Designed by Joseph Paxton, the Great Exhibition building was 1,851 feet (564 m) long, with an interior height of 128 feet (39 m).[1] The invention of the cast plate glass method in 1848 made possible the production of large sheets of cheap but strong glass, and its use in the Crystal Palace created a structure with the greatest area of glass ever seen in a building and astonished visitors with its clear walls and ceilings that did not require interior lights. It has been suggested that the name of the building resulted from a The Crystal Palace at Sydenham (1854) piece penned by the playwright Douglas Jerrold, who in July 1850 General information wrote in the satirical magazine Punch about the forthcoming Great Status Destroyed Exhibition, referring to a "palace of very crystal".[2] Type Exhibition palace After the exhibition, it was decided to relocate the Palace to an area of Architectural style Victorian South London known as Penge Common. It was rebuilt at the top of Town or city London Penge Peak next to Sydenham Hill, an affluent suburb of large villas. It stood there from 1854 until its destruction by fire in 1936. The nearby Country United Kingdom residential area was renamed Crystal Palace after the famous landmark Coordinates 51.4226°N 0.0756°W including the park that surrounds the site, home of the Crystal Palace Destroyed 30 November 1936 National Sports Centre, which had previously been a football stadium Cost £2 million that hosted the FA Cup Final between 1895 and 1914. -
1 Recapturing Labour's Traditions? History, Nostalgia and the Re-Writing
Recapturing Labour’s Traditions? History, nostalgia and the re-writing of Clause IV Dr Emily Robinson University of Nottingham The making of New Labour has received a great deal of critical attention, much of which has inevitably focused on the way in which it placed itself in relation to past and future, its inheritances and its iconoclasm.1 Nick Randall is right to note that students of New Labour have been particularly interested in ‘questions of temporality’ because ‘New Labour so boldly advanced a claim to disrupt historical continuity’.2 But it is not only academics who have contributed to this analysis. Many of the key figures associated with New Labour have also had their say. The New Labour project was not just about ‘making history’ in terms of its practical actions; the writing up of that history seems to have been just as important. As early as 1995 Peter Mandelson and Roger Liddle were preparing a key text designed ‘to enable everyone to understand better why Labour changed and what it has changed into’.3 This was followed in 1999 by Phillip Gould’s analysis of The Unfinished Revolution: How the Modernisers Saved the Labour Party, which motivated Dianne Hayter to begin a PhD in order to counteract the emerging consensus that the modernisation process began with the appointment of Gould and Mandelson in 1983. The result of this study was published in 2005 under the title Fightback! Labour’s Traditional Right in the 1970s and 1980s and made the case for a much longer process of modernisation, strongly tied to the trade unions. -
Labour Party RULE BOOK 2018
Labour Party RULE BOOK 2018 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Constitutional rules 1 Clause XII. Disciplinary 40 Clause I. Name and objects 1 Clause XIII. Parliamentary candidates 40 Clause II. Party structure and affiliated organisations 1 Clause XIV. Local government candidates 40 Clause III. The Party’s financial scheme 2 Clause XV. Amendment to rules 40 Clause IV. Aims and values 3 Chapter 8 Rules for branches 41 Clause V. Party programme 3 Clause I. Name 41 Clause VI. Labour Party Conference 4 Clause II. Objects 41 Clause VII. Party officers and statutory officers 4 Clause III. Membership 41 Clause VIII. The National Executive Committee 5 Clause IV. Officers and Executive Committee 41 Clause IX. The National Constitutional Committee 8 Clause V. Meetings 41 Clause X. Scope of rules 8 Clause VI. Local government candidates 42 Chapter 2 Membership rules 10 Clause VII. Miscellaneous 42 Clause I. Conditions of membership 10 Chapter 9 Rules for Regional Boards and European Clause II. Membership procedures 11 Party units 43 Clause III. Membership subscriptions 12 Chapter 10 Rules for women’s forums 44 Chapter 3 Party Conference 14 Clause I. Name 44 Clause I. Delegations 14 Clause II. Aims and values 44 Clause II. Conference Arrangements Committee 15 Clause III. Membership 44 Clause III. Procedural rules for Party Conference 15 Clause IV. Management 44 Clause IV. National Annual Women’s Conference 17 Clause V. Meetings 44 Chapter 4 Elections of national officers of the Party Clause VI. Activities 45 and national committees 18 Clause VII. Finances 45 Clause I. General principles 18 Clause VIII. General 45 Clause II.