Bennett Brook Carters Mussel.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bennett Brook Carter’s Freshwater Mussel Targeted Survey K MEL-MNO-WRM-EN-RPT-0003_02 Specialists in the ecology and management of rivers and wetlands 16 Claude Street Burswood WA 6100 T: +61 (08) 9361 4325 ABN: 43 145 831 554 Interoffice Memorandum To: Jen Longstaff, Principal Environmental Consultant, Eco Logical Australia (ELA) From: Bonita Clark, Senior Ecologist, Wetland Research & Management (WRM) CC: Andrew Storey, Director, WRM; Michelle Murtagh, Environmental Consultant, ELA Date: 27 May 2020 Re: MEL Project 27: Bennett Brook Mussel Targeted Survey, Autumn 2020. Document number: MEL-MNO-WRM-RPT-0003 Dear Jen, As requested by the METRONET Office, a survey targeting Carter’s freshwater mussel (Westralunio carteri) was conducted by Wetland Research & Management (WRM) consulting ecologists at eight sites along Bennett Brook on the 30th April and 1st May 2020 (mid-autumn 2020); four sites upstream, and four sites downstream, of the proposed Morley-Ellenbrook Line (MEL) railway bridge across Bennett Brook, with one of the downstream sites located on the proposed rail crossing. Water was present at three of the eight sites at the time of the survey; one upstream site (BBUS2; Mussel Pool), and two downstream sites (BBDS3 and BBDS4). Specimens of W. carteri were collected at Mussel Pool (BBUS2; 1 live specimen), and BBDS4 (31 live specimens). W. carteri was not detected at BBDS3, nor any of the sites that were dry (BBUS1, BBUS3, BBUS4, BBDS1 and BBDS2). No water was present within Bennett Brook where it is intersected by the MEL Development Envelope, and no W. carteri were detected at this location (i.e. along the transect at site BBDS1). Habitat on Bennett Brook within the MEL Development Envelope did not appear suitable for W. carteri with this area lacking any semi- permanent/permanent pools or flowing water, or suitable sandy/silty substrate at the time of sampling. Construction of the rail bridge will likely require some clearing of riparian vegetation within and adjacent to the brook, which may affect water and habitat quality in downstream receiving environments, where W. carteri was detected. However, if appropriate controls are implemented within/adjacent to the construction zone to control drainage and prevent runoff to the brook, the project would be unlikely to directly impact known downstream populations of W. carteri, which are approximately 1.7 km downstream of the crossing. Information provided to WRM on the design considerations for the MEL Bennett Brook rail bridge indicate the infrastructure will not impact the physical structure and ecological function of Bennett Brook in 1% AEP flood events, maintaining current conditions for fish passage and associated dispersal of glochidia of W. carteri. Based in the design specifications provided, and the distribution of W. carteri derived from the current targeted survey, the potential for direct or indirect impacts arising from the MEL project to W. carteri within Bennett Brook would appear to be low. If you have any queries regarding the results presented in this memorandum, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Page 1 of 16 MEL Project 27: Bennett Brook Carter’s freshwater mussel targeted survey memorandum Bonita Clark Senior Ecologist Page 2 of 16 MEL Project 27: Bennett Brook Carter’s freshwater mussel targeted survey memorandum 1 BACKGROUND The Morley-Ellenbrook Line (MEL), a component of the State government’s METRONET program to increase the size of Perth’s railway network, will connect the existing Midland Line to Perth’s northeast suburbs, terminating in Ellenbrook. The development of the MEL project is being led by the METRONET Office, while the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia (PTA) is the project’s formal proponent. The proposed rail alignment will cross Bennett Brook via a 20 to 25 m railway bridge structure located to the north of Marshall Road, in the suburb of Bennett Springs (see Figure 1 for survey area overview). Bennett Brook is a significant tributary of the Swan River, and a system with high Aboriginal heritage and social value, and known ecological value. The MEL project has been referred for environmental approvals under the State Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) and the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). To support environmental assessments and gain environmental approvals, Wetland Research & Management (WRM) was engaged by Eco Logical Australia (ELA), on behalf of METRONET, to conduct a targeted survey of Bennett Brook for the conservation listed Carter’s freshwater mussel (Westralunio carteri). W. carteri is currently listed as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act and the state Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (BC Act). Data on the presence and distribution of W. carteri in Bennett Brook; upstream, downstream, and in the immediate vicinity of the proposed railway bridge, was collected during a field survey conducted on the 30th April and 1st May 2020 (mid-autumn). This survey was conducted on short notice at the request of METRONET, to provide input to their imminent Environmental Review Document, and was not the optimum timing for detection of W. carteri, given the majority of the Bennett Brook survey area was dry (five of eight survey sites). However, the timing of the survey assisted in the identification of permanent water locations which are more likely to support W. carteri throughout the summer and autumn months when the brook is not flowing, as W. carteri can only survive short periods of drying (Klunzinger 2012). 2 CARTER’S FRESHWATER MUSSEL Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) are a keystone species in freshwater ecosystems due to their filter-feeding ability, the important role they play in nutrient cycling and bio-deposition, as well as the structural habitat and the food source they provide for other organisms (Klunzinger et al. 2014, Vaughn and Hakenkamp 2001, Spooner and Vaughn 2008). Despite their immense importance, a number of freshwater mussel species remain endangered throughout the world, with a multitude of threats influencing their persistence and survival (Klunzinger and Walker 2014). W. carteri (Plate 1) is the only native freshwater Plate 1. Carter's freshwater mussel (Westralunio carteri) found at Mussel Pool within the Bennett Brook study area, mussel found in south-western Australia, with a April 2020. distribution ranging from Moore River in the north, to the south coast, west of Esperance (Klunzinger 2012, Klunzinger et al. 2015). This species is currently listed as Vulnerable on state (Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016: September 2018 list), national (EPBC Act 1999), and international (IUCN Redlist) conservation lists (IUCN 2020). W. carteri occurs in greatest abundance in slower flowing permanent/semi-permanent stream and riverine habitats with stable sediments and low salinity, living two thirds to almost fully buried in sand and finer sediment Page 3 of 16 MEL Project 27: Bennett Brook Carter’s freshwater mussel targeted survey memorandum (Klunzinger et al. 2010, Klunzinger 2012). Klunzinger (2012) only found W. carteri in perennial (permanent/semi-permanent) stream and riverine habitats, and dehydration exposure experiments demonstrated W. carteri cannot survive prolonged drying (i.e. 76% mortality occurring under experimental conditions, within five days of exposure to dry conditions in sand filled bath tubs). The W. carteri lifecycle involves an obligate parasitic ‘larval’ stage, known as glochidia, which attach to host fish for several weeks to complete their development (Bauer and Wächtler 2001, Strayer 2008, Klunzinger et al. 2012). The glochidia aids with the distribution of this species, with individuals being dispersed by migrating fish. W. carteri is a long-lived species, becoming sexually mature within 6 years at approximately 27 mm shell length, and living for at least 50 years (Klunzinger et al. 2014; Plate 2). Despite this known information, there is a distinct knowledge gap with respect to the ecology of W. carteri, thereby confounding conservation efforts and status of the species, whilst emphasizing the protection of any known/new populations of the species (Klunzinger et al. 2015). W. carteri is currently under threat across south-western Australia due to secondary salinisation, loss of suitable host species, nutrient pollution, habitat loss, water extraction, as well as sedimentation resulting in increased turbidity. Reservoir dewatering and declining rainfall also appear to have had a negative effect on populations (Klunzinger et al. 2012). Klunzinger et al. (2015) speculated that the species extent of occurrence (EOO) had declined by 49% in less than 50 years, due primarily to secondary salination, and emphasised the importance of habitat protection where the species persists. Plate 2. Figure 3 from Klunzinger et al. (2014); age-at-length measurements for W. carteri at Bennett Brook (A), Brunswick River (B), Collie River (C), Serpentine River, Dog Hill (D), and Serpentine River, Horse Drink (E). Page 4 of 16 MEL Project 27: Bennett Brook Carter’s freshwater mussel targeted survey memorandum Figure 1. Overview of the MEL Development Envelope, showing Bennett Brook and sites sited for the W. carteri targeted survey. Page 5 of 16 MEL Project 27: Bennett Brook Carter’s freshwater mussel targeted survey memorandum 3 SURVEY METHODS Eight sites along Bennett Brook were surveyed for W. carteri in mid-autumn 2020; BBUS1, BBUS2 (Mussel Pool, Plate 3), BBUS3 (Plate 4) and BBUS4 on the 30th April 2020 (Table 1, Figure 2), and BBDS1, BBDS2, BBDS3 (Plate 5) and BBDS4 (Plate 6) on the 1st May 2020 ( Page 6 of 16 MEL Project 27: Bennett Brook Carter’s freshwater mussel targeted survey memorandum Table 2, Figure 2). Water was present at three of the eight sites during the survey, BBUS2 (Mussel Pool), BBDS3 and BBDS4. 3.1 Transect and quadrat establishment Visual and hand searches for mussels were conducted by two people, in eight quadrats of 1 m2 placed along a longitudinal 100m transect (approx. 14 m intervals, running from upstream to downstream) in the brook channel at each site, following methodology of Klunzinger et al.