DOCSLIB.ORG

San Francisco Bay Area Network Northern Spotted Owl Monitoring Protocol Version 6.4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Francisco Bay Area Network Northern Spotted Owl Monitoring Protocol Version 6.4 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center San Francisco Bay Area Network Northern Spotted Owl Monitoring Protocol Version 6.4 Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR—2010/245 ON THE COVER Female northern spotted owl and fledglings in Point Reyes National Seashore, 2007. Photo by Heather Jensen, NPS. San Francisco Bay Area Network Northern Spotted Owl Monitoring Protocol Version 6.4 Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR—2010/245 Press, David Adams, Dawn Jensen, Heather Fehring, Katie1 Merkle, William W.2 Koenen, Marcus Starcevich, Leigh Ann3 National Park Service San Francisco Bay Area I&M Network Point Reyes National Seashore One Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, California 94956 1 PRBO Conservation Science 4990 Shoreline Highway Stinson Beach, California 94970 2 Golden Gate National Recreation Area Bldg 201, Fort Mason San Francisco, California 94123 3 University of Idaho PO Box 1032 Corvallis, Oregon 97339 September 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal, high-level peer review based on the importance of its content, or its potentially controversial or precedent-setting nature. Peer review was conducted by highly qualified individuals with subject area technical expertise and was overseen by a peer review manager. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the San Francisco Area Network Inventory and Monitoring website (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/sfan) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM). Please cite this publication as: Press, D., D. Adams, H. Jensen, K. Fehring, W. Merkle, M. Koenen, and L. A. Starcevich. 2010. San Francisco Bay Area Network northern spotted owl monitoring protocol : Version 6.4. Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR—2010/245. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 963/105610, September 2010 ii Revision History Log Prev. Version # Revision Date Author Changes Made Reason for New Change Version # September D. Adams, First draft of Preparation for first 1.0 2003 K. Fehring, monitoring protocol peer review. D. Hatch, S. Allen 1.0 August 2004 D. Adams, Minor revisions to Preparation for first 2.0 K. Fehring, previous version. peer review. B. Merkle 2.0 August 2004 D. Adams, Minor revisions to Preparation for first 3.0 K. Fehring, previous version. peer review. B. Merkle 3.0 September D. Adams, Minor revisions to Preparation for first 4.0 2004 K. Fehring, previous version. peer review. B. Merkle 4.0 October 2004 D. Adams, Minor revisions to Preparation for first 5.0 K. Fehring, previous version. peer review. B. Merkle 5.0 May 2008 D. Adams, Report format edits. To address peer 6.3 H. Jensen, Expanded and review comments K. Fehring, improved sections on and meet current B. Merkle, D. monitoring history, formatting Press, M. previous research, guidelines. Koenen barred owls, and reporting methods. Revised monitoring objectives. Added randomized study design based on new power analyses developed by SFSU. 6.3 April 2010 D. Press, D. Report format edits. To address peer 6.4 Adams, H. Expanded NSO review comments Jensen, K. background info. and meet current Fehring, B. Revised monitoring formatting Merkle, M. objectives. Added guidelines. Koenen, L. management triggers. Starcevich New power analyses and sampling design recommendations from University of Idaho. Added documentation of SOD. Provided details on methods for long-term analyses. iii Contents Page Figures.......................................................................................................................................... viii Tables ............................................................................................................................................. ix Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) ...........................................................................................x Appendices .......................................................................................................................................x Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... xiii 1.0 Background and Objectives .......................................................................................................1 1.1 Northern Spotted Owl Range-wide Status and Habitat Associations ............................... 1 1.2 History of Spotted Owl Monitoring in Marin County ...................................................... 4 1.2.1 NSO Inventory ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2.2 NSO Long-Term Monitoring .................................................................................. 4 1.3 History of Spotted Owl Research in Marin County .......................................................... 6 1.3.1 Habitat Associations ............................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Nest Structures ........................................................................................................ 8 1.3.3 NSO Prey ................................................................................................................ 8 1.4 Conservation Threats ........................................................................................................ 8 1.4.1 Barred Owls ............................................................................................................ 9 1.4.2 Sudden Oak Death .................................................................................................. 9 1.4.3 Genetic Isolation ................................................................................................... 10 1.4.4 Predation ............................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Measurable Monitoring Objectives ................................................................................. 10 1.6 Management Objectives .................................................................................................. 11 v 1.7 Triggers for Management Activities ............................................................................... 12 2.0 Sampling Design ......................................................................................................................13 2.1 Study Area and Site Selection ......................................................................................... 13 2.2 Sample Design Power Analysis ...................................................................................... 14 2.2.1 Occupancy Analysis.............................................................................................. 15 2.2.2 Fecundity Analysis................................................................................................ 16 2.2.3 Power Analysis ..................................................................................................... 16 2.3 NSO Monitoring Design ................................................................................................. 17 2.3.1 Sampling Frequency and Timing .......................................................................... 18 2.4 Sample Design Review ................................................................................................... 20 2.5 Additional Surveys .......................................................................................................... 20 3.0 Field Methods ..........................................................................................................................21 3.1 Field Season Preparations ............................................................................................... 21 3.2 Sequence of Events during Field Season ........................................................................ 21 3.3 Survey Protocols ............................................................................................................. 21 3.3.1 Activity Center Monitoring..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Spotted Owl and Barred Owl Home Range Size And
    NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL AND BARRED OWL HOME RANGE SIZE AND HABITAT SELECTION IN COASTAL NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA By Laura E. Weisel A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Natural Resources: Wildlife Committee Membership Dr. T. Luke George, Committee Chair Dr. Larry L. Irwin, Committee Member Dr. Mathew Johnson, Committee Member Dr. Yvonne Everett, Graduate Coordinator July 2015 ABSTRACT NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL AND BARRED OWL HOME RANGE SIZE AND HABITAT SELECTION IN COASTAL NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA Laura E. Weisel The federally threatened northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) continues to experience range-wide population declines despite two-plus decades of intensive conservation and recovery efforts. Management of the owl has been a highly contentious issue, focused primarily on setting aside critical habitat and preserving old- growth and mature forests in the Pacific Northwest. Recent evidence however, indicates that competition from the invading and closely-related barred owl (Strix varia) is the primary threat to northern spotted owl populations. While agonistic interactions are widely documented, there remains a lack of information on how these two species compete for ecological resources. The redwood region of coastal northwestern California, where spotted owl populations remain relatively high, offered a unique opportunity to study resource competition and partitioning between northern spotted owls and barred owls. I used radio-telemetry to locate both species at night with the objectives of (1) determining home range size of northern spotted owls and barred owls (2) determining foraging habitat selection and resource partitioning of sympatric northern spotted owls and barred owls.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Spotted Owls: Influence of Prey Base
    Ecology, 75(5), 1994, pp. 1512-1515 stable in old than in young stands, squirrels were neg- 0 1994 by the Ecological Society of America atively affected by forest fragmentation, and they were isolated by intensively managed timber lands and con- version of forest to nonforest habitats. They concluded NORTHERN SPOTTED 0WLS. that woodrats showed similar patterns and that the home range size of Spotted Owls was related to prey INFLUENCE OF PREY BASE- abundance. These conclusions were based on compar- A COMMENT isons of flying squirrel and woodrat abundances among forest types, seral stages, and geographic regions. These Daniel K. Rosenberg, 1,2 Cynthia J. Zabel,1 Barry R. issues are critical to resource land managers who are Noon,1 and E. Charles Meslow3 interested in silvicultural prescriptions that might en- hance prey densities for Spotted Owls and thereby in- Conflicts between the needs of the Northern Spotted crease the owls’ reproductive success and reduce the Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) and the maintenance amount of foraging habitat used by the owl. In our of a timber -based economy in the Pacific Northwest comment, we question whether the results and meth- have motivated research on the habitat and area re- ods used by Carey et al. (1992) substantiate their con- quirements of the owl. The Northern Spotted Owl has clusions, and cite previous studies that are not consis- been studied extensively throughout its range and con- tent with their conclusions. sistently has been found to select older forest stands for foraging, roosting, and nesting (reviewed in Thomas Concerns Regarding Methods Used to et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A. MINIMIZATION and MITIGATION for the NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL in the FIVE WEST-SIDE and ALL EAST-SIDE PLANNING UNITS Conservation Strate Y for the Five
    A. MINIMIZATION Habitat Definitions Effects of the AND MITIGATION Riparian FOR THE NORTHERN Conservation SPOTTED OWL IN Possible Strategy an THE FlVE WEST-SIDE Components of a Salmonid Habitat AND ALL EAST-SIDE Credible Long-term PLANNING UNITS Conservation Strategy Conservation Objective E, OLYMPIC EXPERIMENTAL Potential Benefits STATE FOREST and lmpacts to Conservation PLANNING UNIT Marbled Murrelets Strategy for the Integrated Five West-side Approach to Planning Units Production and Conservation C. MINIMIZATION Conservation AND MITIGATION Strategy for the FOR OTHER Conservation Three East-side FEDERALLY LISTED Strategy for the Planning Units SPECIES IN ALL Northern Spotted PLANNING UNlTS Owl in the Olympic Oregon Silverspot Experimental State Rationale for the Butterfly Forest Spotted Owl Conservation Objective and Riparian Conserva- Strategies Aleutian Canada Goose tion Strategy for the Olympic Experi- mental State Forest Current Habitat and Projected Habitat Bald Eagle Growth in Nsstixg, Multispecies Con- Roosting, and servation Strategy Foraging and Peregrine Falcon for Unlisted Species Dispersal Manage- in the Olympic ment Areas Gray Wolf Experimental State Forest Potential Benefits and lmpacts to Grizzly Bear Spotted Owls F. MULTISPECIES Columbian White CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR UNLISTED SPECIES B. MINIMIZATION IN THE FlVE WEST- AND MlTlGATlON SIDE PLANNING FOR THE MARBLED UNITS MURRELET IN THE D. RiPARlAN FlVE WEST-SIDE CONSERVATION Introduction AND THE OLYMPIC STRATEGY FOR THE EXPERIMENTAL FlVE WEST-SIDE STATE FOREST PLANNING UNITS Conservation PLANNING UNITS Objectives Conservation Conservation Objectives Objective Conoervaton Strategy Conservation interim Compsnenfs Conservation Strategy Benefits of the Species-Specif is Rationale for the Strategies to Conservation Unlisted Species Components 151 Protection of 184 Plant Species of Uncommon Habitats Concern 158 Species by Species 191 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix Occidentalis Caurina) Cover Photo: © Jared Hobbs, by Permission
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Revised Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Cover photo: © Jared Hobbs, by permission. (www.hobbsphotos.com) Revised Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl {Strix occidentalis caurina) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: ~~ Regional Dir or, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: JUN 2 8 2011 REVISED RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL Disclaimer Recovery plans describe reasonable actions and criteria that are considered necessary to recover listed species. Recovery plans are approved and published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service” or “we” in narrative, (except as otherwise indicated) “USFWS” in citations, “FWS” in tables) and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. The 2011 Revised Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl (Revised Recovery Plan) does not necessarily represent the view or official position of any individual or organization—other than that of the Service—involved in its development. Although the northern spotted owl is a subspecies of spotted owl, we sometimes refer to it as a species when discussing it in the context of the ESA or other laws and regulations. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. The objectives in this Revised Recovery Plan will be achieved subject to availability of funding and the capability of the involved parties to participate while addressing other priorities. This Revised Recovery Plan replaces, in its entirety, the 2008 Recovery Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Age Distribution of Red Tree Voles in Northern Spotted Owl Pellets Estimated from Molar Tooth Development
    Age Distribution of Red Tree Voles in Northern Spotted Owl Pellets Estimated from Molar Tooth Development Authors: Marks-Fife, Chad A., Forsman, Eric D., and Dugger, Katie M. Source: Northwest Science, 93(3-4) : 193-208 Published By: Northwest Scientific Association URL: https://doi.org/10.3955/046.093.0304 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Northwest-Science on 28 Aug 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library (NAL) Chad A. Marks-Fife1, 2, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL (Strix Occidentalis Caurina)
    NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL (Strix occidentalis caurina) Endangered Species Fact Sheet Distribution of northern spotted owls in Oregon Clatsop, Tillamook, Lincoln, Coos, Curry, Josephine, Jackson, Klamath, Douglas, Deschutes, Lane, Jefferson, STATUS: THREATENED Lane, Linn, Benton, Polk, Marion, Yamhill, Washington, Multnomah, Clackamas, Wasco, Hood River, Columbia counties The northern spotted owl was federally listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 1990. In 1992, areas of critical habitat were designated to further protect this subspecies on federal lands. Historical Status and Current Trends The northern spotted owl is believed to have historically inhabited most forests throughout southwestern British Columbia, western Washington and Oregon, and northwestern California as far south as the San Francisco Bay. Loss and adverse modification of nesting, roosting and foraging habitat due to timber harvesting, land conversions, natural disturbances such as fire and windstorms, and increased competition with barred owls, however, have led to a decline of northern spotted owls throughout much of their historic range. Today spotted owls are particularly rare in British Columbia, the Cascade mountains of northern Washington, the Coast ranges of southwest Washington and northwest Oregon. A large and virtually isolated population persists on the Olympic peninsula. Estimates suggest that the amount of suitable habitat available to spotted owls has been reduced by over 60% in the last 190 years. Owl numbers appear to have declined annually since 1985 when many studies began. Although the listing of the spotted owl as threatened and the designation of critical habitat offer some protection for the spotted owl on federal lands, past trends suggest that much of the remaining unprotected habitat could disappear in 10 to 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A, Population Trend Summaries for All Threatened And
    takingA Wild Success The Endangered Species Act’s Success in Saving Endangered Birds Bird Recovery Under the Endangered Species Act A Systematicflight Review of Center for Biological Diversity • June 2016 GROUP 1 97 SPECIES WITH POPULATION TRENDS BETWEEN ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT LISTING AND THE PRESENT ‘AKIAPŌLĀ‘AU ‘Akiapōlā‘au Trend Since Listing: Increased Rangewide Growth: 27% 2,000 1,600 Status: Endangered Listed: 1967 1,200 Individuals 800 Recovery Plan: 2006 400 Critical Habitat: None 0 The ‘akiapōlā‘au has been reduced to a few isolated subpopulations on the island of Hawaii by logging, grazing and development. The bird's subpopulations continue to be threatened by disease as well as competition with, and predation by, invasive species. It was still common in 1903, but it was rare by 1967, when it was listed as endangered. After listing the population grew from 1,496 birds in five subpopulations in 1977 to about 1,900 birds in two subpopulations in 2009. ‘O ‘U ‘O ‘u 50 Trend Since Listing: Declined Rangewide Growth: -100% 40 Status: Endangered Listed: 1967 30 20 IndividualsDetected Recovery Plan: 2006 10 Critical Habitat: None 0 The ‘o‘u declined due to deforestation, livestock grazing, feral ungulates, and invasive species and disease. It was extirpated from four of six islands by the 1930s. There were very few sightings of the bird after the species was listed in 1967. It was last seen on the island of Hawaii in 1987 and on Kauai in 1989. It may well be extinct. AGUIGUAN NIGHTINGALE REED-WARBLER (GAGA KARISU) Trend Since Listing: Declined Rangewide 10 Growth: -100% 9 8 Status: Endangered Listed: 1970 7 6 5 4 3 Recovery Plan: 1998 IndividualsDetected 2 Critical Habitat: None 1 0 The Aguiguan nightingale reed-warbler, or gaga karisu, was endemic to dense native forest understories on the island of Aguiguan in the Northern Mariana Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Fact Sheet Mexican Spotted Owl Species Fact Sheet
    southwestlearning.org american southwest ssPPECIESECIES F ACTFACT SHEET SHEET Family Strigidae (True Owls) Mexican Spotted Owl RaRe SpecieS Strix occidentalis lucida Taxonomy The Mexican spotted owl is one of three subspecies of spotted owl that include the northern spotted owl (S. o. caurina) and the California spotted owl (S. o. occidenta- lis), and is geographically isolated from each. Plumage and geographic distribution distinguish the Mexican spotted owl from the California and northern subspecies. Description ational Park ational The Mexican spotted owl ranks as one of the largest owls n in North America—of the 19 species that occur, only 4 are Zion larger. The average length is 41-48 cm (16-19 inches); av- madrean pine oak, encinal oak woodlands, and riparian forests erage wingspan is 107-114 cm (42-45 inches); and average provide habitat for mexican spotted owls in southern arizona and new mexico. weight is 547-647 grams (19.5-23 ounces). The subspe- cies exhibits reversed sexual dimorphism—the females are larger than males and are, on average, 100 grams heavier. wide variety of biotic communities: • Mixed-conifer forests are commonly used through- Male and female Mexican spotted owls are similar in ap- out the range and may include Douglas fir, white fir, pearance—brown with irregular brown and white spots on southwestern white pine, limber pine, and ponderosa the abdomen, back, and head. Because the spots are larger pine. Understory may include Gambel oak, maples, than other spotted owls, they appear to be lighter. Unlike box elder, and/or New Mexico locust. Highest densi- most owls, Mexican spotted owls have dark eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Sierra Nevada Forests
    Managing Sierra Nevada Forests Chapter 5: California Spotted Owls S. Roberts1 and M. North2 Introduction California spotted owls (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) Summary of Findings are habitat specialists that are strongly associated with 1. Spotted owls select habitat at multiple late-successional forests. For nesting and roosting, scales, with less flexibility in the nesting and they require large trees and snags embedded in a stand roosting habitat requirements, and more with a complex forest structure (Blakesley et al. 2005, flexibility in the foraging habitat. Gutiérrez et al. 1992, Verner et al. 1992b). In mixed- 2. Foraging habitat appears to have more conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada, California spotted moderate canopy closure and is still associ- owls typically nest and roost in stands with high canopy ated with large trees, possibly because of closure (≥75 percent) [Note: when citing studies, we use terminology consistent with Jennings et al. (1999), their importance as nest sites for northern however, not all studies properly distinguish between flying squirrels, an important prey species for canopy cover and closure and often use the terms spotted owls in mesic Sierra Nevada forests. interchangeably (see chapter 14 for clarification)] and 3. Low- to moderate-severity fire does not an abundance of large trees (>24 in (60 cm) diameter reduce the probability of spotted owl occu- at breast height [d.b.h.]) (Bias and Gutiérrez 1992, pancy if numerous large trees and areas of Gutiérrez et al. 1992, LaHaye et al. 1997, Moen and high canopy closure remain after a fire. Gutiérrez 1997, Verner et al. 1992a). The California 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Response of Northern Spotted Owls to Barred Owl Removal
    The Journal of Wildlife Management 80(4):691–707; 2016; DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.1046 Research Article Demographic Response of Northern Spotted Owls to Barred Owl Removal LOWELL V. DILLER,1 Green Diamond Resource Company, Korbel, CA 95550, USA KEITH A. HAMM, Green Diamond Resource Company, Korbel, CA 95550, USA DESIREE A. EARLY, Green Diamond Resource Company, Korbel, CA 95550, USA DAVID W. LAMPHEAR, Green Diamond Resource Company, Korbel, CA 95550, USA KATIE M. DUGGER, U.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA CHARLES B. YACKULIC, U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ, USA CARL J. SCHWARZ, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada PETER C. CARLSON, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA TRENT L. MCDONALD, Western EcoSystems Technology, Laramie, WY, USA ABSTRACT Federally listed as threatened in 1990 primarily because of habitat loss, the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) has continued to decline despite conservation efforts resulting in forested habitat being reserved throughout its range. Recently, there is growing evidence the congeneric invasive barred owl (Strix varia) may be responsible for the continued decline primarily by excluding spotted owls from their preferred habitat. We used a long-term demographic study for spotted owls in coastal northern California as the basis for a pilot barred owl removal experiment. Our demography study used capture–recapture, reproductive output, and territory occupancy data collected from 1990 to 2013 to evaluate trends in vital rates and populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Barred Owl (Strix Varia) Removal on Population Demography of Northern Spotted Owls (Strix Occidentalis Caurina) in Washington and Oregon, 2015–18
    Effects of Barred Owl (Strix varia) Removal on Population Demography of Northern Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in Washington and Oregon, 2015–18 Open-File Report 2019-1074 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph of a Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) in the Oregon Coast Range. Photograph copyright by Patrick Kolar, Oregon State University, 2006. Used with permission. Effects of Barred Owl (Strix varia) Removal on Population Demography of Northern Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) in Washington and Oregon, 2015–18 By J. David Wiens, Katie M. Dugger, Damon B. Lesmeister, Krista E. Dilione, and David C. Simon Open-File Report 2019-1074 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call8 –ASK–1–88 USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https:/store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most pa rt, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of the California Spotted Owl R.J
    The California Spotted Owl: Current State of Knowledge Chapter 2: The Biology of the California Spotted Owl R.J. Gutiérrez, Douglas J. Tempel, and M. Zachariah Peery1 Introduction The spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) is one of the most studied raptors in the world (Lõmus 2004) because forest management throughout its range has the potential to negatively affect owl populations. Information on the California spotted owl (S. o. occidentalis) has been summarized in several literature reviews (e.g., Gutiérrez 1996; Gutiérrez and Carey 1985; Gutiérrez et al. 1995; Keane 2014; Roberts and North 2012; USFWS 1990, 1993, 2003, 2006; Verner et al. 1992a). However, the first comprehensive review of the biology of the California spotted owl was con- ducted by Verner et al. (1992a). Verner et al. (1992a) also served as a foundational chapter for the California spotted owl technical assessment “The California Spotted Owl: A technical Assessment of it’s current status” (CASPO) and its recommended owl management strategy (Verner et al. 1992b). Much has been learned about the biology of the California spotted owl since CASPO including new methods of data analysis to provide scientifically defensible results (Gutiérrez 2004, 2008). In this chapter, we summarize new information on the natural and life history of the California spotted owl that has been gathered primarily since CASPO (Verner et al. 1992b), but we also include new research about other owl subspecies (northern and Mexican spotted owls, S. o. caurina and S. o. lucida, respectively) when it is appli- cable to the California spotted owl. We cite the Birds of North America spotted owl account (Gutiérrez et al.
    [Show full text]