VAY‟YESHEV (And He Dwelt)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

VAY‟YESHEV (And He Dwelt) VAY‟YESHEV (And He Dwelt) GENESIS (B‟RESHIYT 37:1 – 40:23) INTRODUCTION: 1. After Jacob‟s ordeal and a brief mention of Esau‟s family, the text now back to Jacob‟s family. a. Primarily Joseph, who is destined to be leader of the family. 2. Mentions that Jacob “settled” or “dwelt” in the land of his father‟s sojournings. a. yashev means to “settle down,” to “dwell in peace” – related to “sitting.” b. This implies permanency as opposed to sojourning, which implies wandering. c. Is this to say, Jacob had intentions to “settle down” permanently in Canaan? 3. From his perspective he had: Fathered the twelve tribes. Survived the exile in Syria. Survived confrontation with Esau. Had fulfilled his vow at Bethel. 4. Rabbinical commentary argues this was not possible because his purpose was not complete. a. God‟s people are not purposed to sit quietly and idly by – they are to be light. b. Light must go where the darkness is. c. Joseph would lead the way, but all of Israel would follow, including Jacob. 5. The exile of Joseph into Egypt had to happen; foretold to Abraham at Covenant of the Pieces. a. But why at the hand of his own brothers? b. Perhaps this has something to do with what would transpire with the Messiah. “He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him.” – John 1:11 6. Even though his brothers despised him and did not consider him their “king” – he would be a king anyway – even if among the Gentiles. a. Wherever he went, he ruled: Potiphar‟s house, the prison, Egypt. b. This is what we see in Messiah. “He said therefore, „A nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and then return.… But his citizens hated him and sent a delegation after him, saying, We do not want this man to reign over us.‟ ” – Luke 19:12, 14 “Now it was the day of Preparation of the Passover. It was about the sixth hour. He said to the Jews, „Behold your King!‟ They cried out, „Away with him, away with him, crucify him!‟ Pilate said to them, „Shall I crucify your King?‟ The chief priests answered, „We have no king but Caesar.‟ ” – John 19:14 7. Like the cruel actions of the brothers, these actions played a role in God‟s purposes. a. In Joseph‟s case, he was in Egypt that he could be Israel‟s savior in a time of famine. b. Furthermore, this would lay groundwork for Exodus and journey to Sinai. 8. Likewise, rejection of Y‟shua by His brethren laid groundwork for God‟s greater purpose. “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.” – Psalm 18:22 9. In the torah portion, Judah “descends” literally and figuratively after Joseph is “rejected” and sent away into Egypt; is entangled in the affair with Tamar. a. Two principals in Jacob‟s family are Judah and Joseph. b. Judah is leader and ancestor of King David and Messiah; Joseph has the birthright. c. In Torah portion, a contrast is given between Judah‟s failure and Joseph‟s virtue. d. Both were tempted; Joseph resisted temptation, Judah did not. 10. In rejecting Y‟shua (Joseph), Judah “descended” into a time of trouble. a. Even while Joseph “descended” into Egypt and is regarded as King among the nations. b. A time of trouble will bring them both together. c. Through Judah‟s noble acts (then and in future) the two will be restored. d. The King will reveal His true identity to His brothers – those who rejected Him. CHAPTER 37: JOSEPH‟S DREAMS 1. V 1: “And Jacob settled (Heb.vayeshev) in the land of his father‟s sojournings.” a. Jacob chose to live as his father lived – in a land promised to them and their seed. b. They did this as aliens in partial fulfillment of the prophecy given to Abraham. “Then the LORD said to Abram, „Know for certain that your offspring will be sojourners in a land that is not theirs and will be servants there, and they will be afflicted for four hundred years.” – Genesis 15:13 2. V 2: “These are the generations of Jacob” – although only Joseph is mentioned by name. a. He is to be at the center of the events described for the remainder of Genesis. 3. V 2: “Joseph, being seventeen years old, was feeding the flock with his brethren, still a lad.” a. Tradition states that Jacob was 108 at the time; Isaac was 168, living 12 more years. b. This is said to have occurred nine years after Jacob arrived back in the land. 4. The word “feeding” suggests “supervising” thus mentioning he was still a lad. a. The word ro’eh comes from root ra’ah that means “to tend, to shepherd, to rule.” b. Thus, the alternate translation: “Joseph, being seventeen years old, used to supervise – although only a lad – his brethren, the sons of Bilhah and the sons of Zilpah when they were with the sheep.” 5. Suggesting that he may have been placed in charge, only, of the sons of the handmaids, although they are regarded as “his father‟s wives.” a. By this time, Rachel and Leah have died. 6. V 2: “Joseph brought an evil report of them unto their father.” a. That he was a lad also suggests that he was immature and lacked discretion. b. The word “report” means “to weaken” – implies slander, defaming someone. c. The word “evil” - ra’ah - is spelled identically to word for “feeding.” 7. Suggests his youthful immaturity and indiscretion led him to belittle them at great expense. 8. V 3: “Israel loved Joseph more than all his children because he was the son of his old age.” a. Benjamin was still a toddler; later, after Joseph exiled, Benjamin would take this place. b. This provoked jealousy and hatred among the other brothers. 9. Was this love also because of the perceived spiritual superiority over the brothers? a. God chose Israel over Esau; Abraham preferred Isaac. b. The favored ones were, in fact, the true protector of the covenant. c. The fact Jacob is referred to as Israel here hints at this possibility. 10. Might also suggest that Joseph has been favored with the knowledge that Jacob has obtained. a. Joseph endured his exile (22 yrs.) without succumbing to temptation and despair. b. Jacob was also able to endure his exile (22 yrs.) and emerge blessed rather than beaten. 11. V 3: “He made him a coat of many colors” – alt. “a fine woolen tunic.” a. “Many colors” translation is based on the LXX and the Targum of Jonathan. b. In other Semitic cultures, multi-colored coats signified rulership; for example. “And she had a garment of divers colors upon her; for with such robes were the king's daughters that were virgins appareled.” – 2 Samuel 13:18 12. A coat given by Jacob would signal that Joseph would rule the family upon Jacob‟s death. a. It elevated him to the status of “firstborn.” 13. The coat, the evil reports and his vanity in reciting the dreams fueled the brother‟s contempt. a. V 4: “They hated him and could not speak peaceably to him.” “And Joseph dreamed a dream, and he told it to his brethren: and they hated him yet the more. And he said unto them, „Hear, I pray you, this dream which I have dreamed: for, behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and, lo, my sheaf arose, and also stood upright; and, behold, your sheaves came round about, and bowed down to my sheaf.” – Genesis 37:5-7 14. These were no typical dreams; obviously Heaven validating that Joseph would rule. a. Yet, his youth and immaturity would not allow him to be silent. b. Footnote: many in Messianic movement have not learned this lesson. 15. The sheaves in dream hint that they would bow because of their need for grain. a. That his remained standing indicated that he would rule for a long time. b. Joseph believed to have been viceroy in Egypt for 80 years. c. Yet, this ultimately alludes to Y‟shua who will reign forever. “And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.” – Luke 1:33 16. That they will “bow down” also reminds of two other Scriptures: a. One pertaining to the Messiah; the other to Philadelphia. “Wherefore also God highly exalted him, and gave unto him the name which is above every name; that in the name of Y‟shua every knee should bow, of things in heaven and things on earth and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Y'shua is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” – Philippians 2:9-11 “Behold, I give of the synagogue of Satan, of them that say they are Jews, and they are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.” – Revelation 3:9 17. Philadelphia is similar to Joseph in that they: Had little strength – had been through trials. Had not denied His name – been faithful to His commands. 18. V 8: “Shall you reign over us or shall you have dominion over us? They hated him more.” a. To “reign over us” signifies as a king with the consent of the governed. b. To “have dominion” indicates ruling over them against their will.
Recommended publications
  • THE TREADMILL of LIFE 9. Vayeshev TEXT 1
    12/4/20 9. Vayeshev THE TREADMILL OF LIFE If Yesterday Was Good, Today Must Be Even Better “And Judah took a wife for Er, his ִַוחקי ַ ְָיהוּהד ִָאשׁ ה ֵרְלע וֹוֹרְבּכ שׁוּ ְ ָמהּ .firstborn, named Tamar ָרָתּמ : Now, Er, Judah’s firstborn, was eviL in“ ִיְַוהי ֵער וֹרְבּכ ְָיהוּהד ַרע ֵניְֵבּע י ה ,' the eyes of G-d, and G-d put him to TEXT death. ְַומיהתוּ ִֵ ה :' So Judah said to Onan, “Come to“ ֶַויֹּרמא ְָיהוּהד ָנוְֹלא ן , אבּ ֹ ֶאל ֵֶאשׁ ת your brother’s wife And perform the 1 rite of the Levirate, and raise up חאָ ִ י ? ֵַבְּוםי תא ָ ֹ הּ , ְֵָוקהם ַעֶזר יִ?ְלאָח : ”.progeny for your brother ֵַעדַוי וֹא נ ָ ן יִכּ אC וֹל ְֶיהִיה ַעָרזַה , ָָהְויה Now, Onan knew that the progeny“ ִאם ָבּא ֶאל ֵֶאשׁ ת חאָ ִ י ו ְוִֵחשׁת ראַ ְ ָצ ה , ,would not be his, and it came about when he came to his brother’s wife, ְִלתְּלב יִ ָןְנת ַעֶזר ויְִלאָח : he wasted on the ground, in order not ֵַעַורי ֵניְֵבּע י ה ' ֲֶאשׁ ר ָָעשׂ ה , ַָומית ֶ ַגם .to give seed to his brother “Now, what he did was eviL in the eyes תא ֹ וֹ : ”.of G-d, and He put him to death aLso BEREISHIT (GENESIS) 38:6–10 1 12/4/20 “If brothers reside together, and one of יִכּ ְֵיוּבשׁ חאַ ִ י ם ָוְדַיח , מוּ ֵ ת them dies having no son, the dead man’s חאַ ַ ד ֶםֵמה בוּ ֵ ן ןיֵא וֹל , אwife shall not marry an outsider.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legends of Genesis
    THE LEGENDS OF GENESIS. BY H. GUNKEL. THE SIGNIFICANCE AND SCOPE OF THE LEGENDS. ARE the narratives of Genesis history or legend? For the mod- Ix. ern historian this is no longer an open question ; neverthe- less it is important to get a clear notion of the bases of this modern position. The writing of history is not an innate endowment of the hu- man mind ; it arose in the course of human history and at a definite stage of development. Uncivilised races do not write history; they are incapable of reproducing their experiences objectively, and have no interest in leaving to posterity an authentic account of the events of their time. Experiences fade before they are fairly cold, and fact and fancy mingle ; only in poetical form, in song and saga, are unlettered tribes able to report historical occurrences. Only at a certain stage of civilisation has objectivity so grown and the interest in transmitting national experiences to posterity so in- creased that the writing of history becomes possible. Such history has for its subjects great public events, the deeds of popular lead- ers and kings, and especially wars. Accordingly some sort of po- litical organisation is an antecedent presumption to the writing of history. Only in a later, in the main a much later, time is the art of writing history, learned through the practice of writing national histories, applied to other spheres of human life, whence we have memoirs and the histories of families. But considerable sections of the people have never risen to the appreciation of history proper, IThe present treatise is the Introduction to the same author's Comnu-niary on Genesis (\'an- (ienboek & Ruprecht, Giittingen), in which the positions here taken are expounded and supported in greater detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the Kenites? OTE 24/2 (2011): 414-430
    414 Mondriaan: Who were the Kenites? OTE 24/2 (2011): 414-430 Who were the Kenites? MARLENE E. MONDRIAAN (U NIVERSITY OF PRETORIA ) ABSTRACT This article examines the Kenite tribe, particularly considering their importance as suggested by the Kenite hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, the Kenites, and the Midianites, were the peoples who introduced Moses to the cult of Yahwism, before he was confronted by Yahweh from the burning bush. Scholars have identified the Cain narrative of Gen 4 as the possible aetiological legend of the Kenites, and Cain as the eponymous ancestor of these people. The purpose of this research is to ascertain whether there is any substantiation for this allegation connecting the Kenites to Cain, as well as con- templating the Kenites’ possible importance for the Yahwistic faith. Information in the Hebrew Bible concerning the Kenites is sparse. Traits associated with the Kenites, and their lifestyle, could be linked to descendants of Cain. The three sons of Lamech represent particular occupational groups, which are also connected to the Kenites. The nomadic Kenites seemingly roamed the regions south of Palestine. According to particular texts in the Hebrew Bible, Yahweh emanated from regions south of Palestine. It is, therefore, plausible that the Kenites were familiar with a form of Yahwism, a cult that could have been introduced by them to Moses, as suggested by the Kenite hypothesis. Their particular trade as metalworkers afforded them the opportunity to also introduce their faith in the northern regions of Palestine. This article analyses the etymology of the word “Kenite,” the ancestry of the Kenites, their lifestyle, and their religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the King – Joshua, Judges & Ruth 2016 Baney, Lesson 14
    Before the King – Joshua, Judges & Ruth 2016 Before the King – Joshua, Judges and Ruth: Have you ever wondered what it would be like to live under a theocracy - a state ruled by the law of God? Why did God require the ancient church (children of Israel) to kill the inhabitants of the land of Canaan before taking possession of the land? Who was Ruth, and why is she important among personalities of scripture? These questions and more will be some of the topics that we explore together in the age before the king. The objective of this class is: to gain a deeper understanding of the historical redemptive plan of God through the period before the Israelite Monarchy, and apply principles as revealed in three historical books to everyday Christian living. Samson & His Exploits – (Judges Chapters 13-15) So far we have explored the lives of eleven of the twelve judges. Some have been explored in depth while others were simply given a passing glance. We have seen how that all have demonstrated to us the mercy of God. This week we will begin the first of a two-part lesson exploring the life of the twelfth and final judge: Samson. As might be expected, his birth and call are extraordinary as is the manner in which God used him to bring salvation to his people. What might not be obvious upon first glance was the low position to which the people of God have sunk. We referenced last week how that the cycle reappearing throughout the book was a downward one.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Shekels and Shackles: a Wadi Sorek Romance ( Judges
    Of Shekels and Shackles: A Wadi Sorek Romance (Judges 16) Jack M. Sasson Abstract: This essay focuses on Samson in Delilah’s chamber (Judges 16). It explores the use of love charms in antiquity to clarify the bonds between the two major characters. It also offers an alterna- tive understanding for why Samson gave in to Delilah’s serial insistence that he reveals the secret of his strength. Keywords: Samson, Delilah, Judges 13–16 Amare et sapere vix deo conceditur (Publilius Syrus, first century BCE) o Norma Franklin, a good friend for a generation and a respected colleague for Ttwice as long, I offer frothy thoughts about Samson’s final moments as a free hu- man being. A first-rate archaeologist with scrupulous attachment to historical facts and realities, Norma is also a lover of good stories. On this occasion, therefore, I avoid com- menting on the origin(s), date(s), and permutations of traditions on which hard-core scholarship grooves.1 Rather, I will trust the Hebrew editor to have redacted a version that, however episodic, has proven its power to please through countless reformula- tions, in poetry, art, musical settings, and films. No one, Norma least of all, needs reminding of the essentials of the Samson stories that unfold from Judges 13 through 16. Having given up on raising a family, a childless couple from the tribe of Dan receives divine news that they are to have a son. Repeated threefold in the span of chapter 13 (at 3–5, 7, and 13–14), extraordinary instruction consistently assigns the wife (conspicuously unnamed) the burden of consecrating her body, perhaps for the duration of her pregnancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vayigash Genesis 44:18-47:27 Week of December 28--January3 ,2004
    www.Chabad.org Vayigash Genesis 44:18-47:27 Week of December 28--January3 ,2004 Judah approaches Joseph to plead for the release of Benjamin, offering himself as a slave to the Egyptian ruler in Benjamin's stead. Upon witnessing his brothers' loyalty to one another, Joseph reveals his identity to them. "I am Joseph," he declares. "Is my father still alive?" The brothers are overcome by shame and remorse, but Joseph comforts them. "It was not you who sent me here," he says to them, "but G-d. It has all been ordained from Above to save us, and the entire region, from famine." The brothers rush back to Canaan with the news. Jacob comes to Egypt with his sons and their families -- seventy souls in all -- and is reunited with his beloved son after 22 years. On his way to Egypt he receives the Divine promise: "Fear not to go down to Egypt; for I will there make of you a great nation. I will go down with you into Egypt, and I will also surely bring you up again." Joseph gathers the wealth of Egypt by selling food and seed during the famine. Pharaoh gives Jacob's fam- ily the fertile county of Goshen to settle, and the chil- dren of Israel prosper in their Egyptian exile. Parshah in a Nutshell | Parshah in Depth | From the Chassidic Masters | 1 www.ChabadOnline.com But the brothers won’t go in peace. Judah, their spokesman and leader, and the one who assumed personal responsibili- ty to Jacob for Benjamin’s safe return, pleads: “How shall I go up to my father, and the lad be not with me?” Benjamin is the only surviving child of our father’s most beloved wife, Vayigash his older brother having disappeared many years ago; our Genesis 44:18-47:27 father’s very life is bound with Benjamin’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • Lachish Fortifications and State Formation in the Biblical Kingdom
    Radiocarbon, Vol 00, Nr 00, 2019, p 1–18 DOI:10.1017/RDC.2019.5 © 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona LACHISH FORTIFICATIONS AND STATE FORMATION IN THE BIBLICAL KINGDOM OF JUDAH IN LIGHT OF RADIOMETRIC DATINGS Yosef Garfinkel1* • Michael G Hasel2 • Martin G Klingbeil2 • Hoo-Goo Kang3 • Gwanghyun Choi1 • Sang-Yeup Chang1 • Soonhwa Hong4 • Saar Ganor5 • Igor Kreimerman1 • Christopher Bronk Ramsey6 1Institute of Archaeology, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel 2Institute of Archaeology, Southern Adventist University, USA 3Seoul Jangsin University, Korea 4Institute of Bible Geography of Korea, Korea 5Israel Antiquities Authority, Israel 6Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, UK ABSTRACT. When and where the process of state formation took place in the biblical kingdom of Judah is heavily debated. Our regional project in the southwestern part of Judah, carried out from 2007 to the present, includes the excavation of three Iron Age sites: Khirbet Qeiyafa, Tel Lachish, and Khirbet al-Ra’i. New cultural horizons and new fortification systems have been uncovered, and these discoveries have been dated by 59 radiometric determinations. The controversial question of when the kingdom was able to build a fortified city at Lachish, its foremost center after Jerusalem, is now resolved thanks to the excavation of a previously unknown city wall, dated by radiocarbon (14C) to the second half of the 10th century BCE. KEYWORDS: Iron Age, Kingdom of Judah, Khirbet al-Ra’i, Khirbet Qeiyafa, Lachish, radiometric chronology. INTRODUCTION The debate over the chronology of the Iron Age is one of the central controversies in the current scholarship of the archaeology of the southern Levant as well as biblical studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Kol Rina an Independent Minyan Parashat Vayeshev December 21, 2019 *** 23 Kislev, 5780
    Kol Rina An Independent Minyan Parashat Vayeshev December 21, 2019 *** 23 Kislev, 5780 Kol Rina – An Independent Minyan, is a traditional egalitarian community. We are haimish (homey/folksy), friendly, participatory, warm and welcoming. We hold weekly services in South Orange as well as holiday services and celebrations which are completely lay led. We welcome all to our services and programs from non-Hebrew readers to Jewish communal and education professionals. Today's Portions 1: 37:1-3...............................p. 226 5: 37:18-22........…......p. 229 2: 37:4-7...............................p. 227 6: 37:23-28........…......p. 230 3: 37:8-11..............................p. 227 7: 37:29-36........…......p. 231 4: 37:12-17...........................p. 228 maf: 40:20-23..................p. 244 Haftarah: Amos 2:6 - 3:8...................................p. 247 Vayeshev in a Nutshell https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/3202/jewish/Vayeshev-in-a-Nutshell.htm Jacob settles in Hebron with his twelve sons. His favorite is seventeen-year-old Joseph, whose brothers are jealous of the preferential treatment he receives from his father, such as a precious many-colored coat that Jacob makes for Joseph. Joseph relates to his brothers two of his dreams which foretell that he is destined to rule over them, increasing their envy and hatred towards him. Simeon and Levi plot to kill him, but Reuben suggests that they throw him into a pit instead, intending to come back later and save him. While Joseph is in the pit, Judah has him sold to a band of passing Ishmaelites. The brothers dip Joseph’s special coat in the blood of a goat and show it to their father, leading him to believe that his most beloved son was devoured by a wild beast.
    [Show full text]
  • VAYESHEV-12.12.2020.Pdf
    DECEMBER 12, 2020 • 26 Kislev 5781 Vayeshev Mazel Tov to proud parents, Julie and Ben Weinberger on the Sunday Bar Mitzvah of their son, Noah Weinberger. DECEMBER 12, 2020 • 26 Kislev 5781 Please proceed to WWW.ANSHEEMET.ORG/LIVESTREAM Vayeshev to view our services. Shabbat Shalom and Welcome! Click here to view We welcome you to Anshe Emet Synagogue and hope that Anshe Emet • Chanukah all of our community you enjoy our worship service. If you are a visitor, please Chanukah programs. introduce yourself so we may welcome you and wish you Let's Celebrate the Lights Shabbat Shalom. Everyone is invited to join our community for Kiddush lunch following services. of Love, together! LOVE Mission Statement Chanukah Highlights: Click images below to learn more! Anshe Emet Synagogue seeks to encourage involvement and create a special sense of belonging. We are committed to meeting the religious, educational, social, and cultural needs of our members within the framework of the Conservative Movement. In keeping with the teachings of Judaism and the spirit of Klal Yisrael, we recognize our responsibility to serve the Jewish community, the wider community and the state of Israel. Michael S. Siegel • Senior Rabbi, Norman Asher Rabbinic Chair Alberto Mizrahi • Hazzan Emeritus, Arnold H. Kaplan M.D. Cantorial Chair David Russo • Rabbi D’ror Chankin–Gould • Rabbi Elizabeth Berke • Interim Hazzan Naomi Weiss-Weil • Ritual Director Transliteration of the Prayer for the State of Israel: Art Friedson • President Avinu sheh-bashamayim, tsur Yisrael v’goalo, bareikh et m’dinat Yisrael Boni Fine • Executive Director reishit ts’michat g’ulateinu.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Millard, "The Ostracon from the Days of David Found at Khirbet
    THE OSTRACON FROM THE DAYS OF DAVID FOUND AT KHIRBET QEIYAFA Alan Millard Summary A newly discovered ostracon at Khirbet Qeiyafa which dates from about 1000 BC is a welcome addition to the meagre examples of writing which survive from that period. The letters are difficult to read and the language may be Hebrew, Canaanite, Phoenician or Moabite. Translations range from a list of names to commands concerning social justice. The simplest explanation is that this is a list of Hebrew and Canaanite names written by someone unused to writing. They help to suggest that writing was practised by non-scribes, so the skill may have been widespread. Introduction Discoveries of written documents in the Holy Land are always noteworthy, especially those from the Eleventh and Tenth Centuries BC. From those centuries there are very few examples indeed. There are only two of any length. The Gezer Calendar is well known, found during the Palestine Exploration Fund’s work at the site in 1908, and generally dated to about 925 BC. A more recent find is the alphabet scratched on a boulder unearthed at Tel Zayit by the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary expedition in 2005. 1 Apart from these there are only personal names scratched on a stone and on potsherds that can be placed approximately in the Tenth Century, the period of the reigns of David and Solomon. They are part of a gaming board from Beth 1 R. E. Tappy, P. K. McCarter, ed., Literate Culture and Tenth Century Canaan: The Tel Zayit Abecedary in Context (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Joshua
    Book of Joshua Part 8 Historical, War, Conquest, Prophetic & Victorious Living Defeat at Ai 7 But the children of Israel committed a trespass regarding the accursed ​ ​ ​ ​ things, for Achan the son of Carmi, the son of Zabdi, the son of Zerah, of the tribe of Judah, took of the accursed things; so the anger of the Lord burned ​ against the children of Israel. 1. Starts chapter with “but”....this is not good 2. Geneology tells us this is the descendants of Zerah is offspring from Judah’s whoredom with Tamar….His daughter in law….Jesus genealogy 3. Did Joshua ask of the Lord prior to battle...could the defeat have been prevented….. 4. Children of Israel suffer….your sin is not isolated to you! Satans lie...it is not hurting anyone….it is just affecting me…..generational blessing and cursing 5. Deuteronomy 28:2 And all these blessings shall come upon you and ​ ​ ​ overtake you, because you obey the voice of the Lord your God: - ​ ​ Blessings and Curses overtake us 6. What sin do you bring into the camp? What are you stealing or hiding?? 7. Sin is serious even in the New Testament…..Acts 5:But a certain man ​ ​ named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession. 2 And he ​ ​ ​ kept back part of the proceeds, his wife also being aware of it, and ​ ​ ​ ​ brought a certain part and laid it at the apostles’ feet. 3 But Peter said, ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? 4 While it ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not in your own control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God.” 5 Then Ananias, hearing these ​ ​ ​ words, fell down and breathed his last.
    [Show full text]