Backcountry Camping Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Alaska Range
Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range. -
BOREAS Line Altitude Variations of the Mckinley River Region, Central Alaska Range
Late Quaternary glaciation and equilibrium line altitude variations of the McKinley River region, central Alaska Range JASON M. DORTCH, LEWIS A. OWEN, MARC W. CAFFEE AND PHIL BREASE Dortch, J. M., Owen, L. A., Caffee, M. W. & Brease, P. 2010 (April): Late Quaternary glaciation and equilibrium BOREAS line altitude variations of the McKinley River region, central Alaska Range. Boreas, Vol. 39, pp. 233–246. 10.1111/ j.1502-3885.2009.00121.x. ISSN 0300-9483 Glacial deposits and landforms produced by the Muldrow and Peters glaciers in the McKinley River region of Alaska were examined using geomorphic and 10Be terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide (TCN) surface exposure dating (SED) methods to assess the timing and nature of late Quaternary glaciation and moraine stabilization. In addition to the oldest glacial deposits (McLeod Creek Drift), a group of four late Pleistocene moraines (MP-I, II, III and IV) and three late Holocene till deposits (‘X’, ‘Y’ and ‘Z’ drifts) are present in the region, representing at least eight glacial advances. The 10Be TCN ages for the MP-I moraine ranged from 2.5 kyr to 146 kyr, which highlights the problems of defining the ages of late Quaternary moraines using SED methods in central Alaska. The Muldrow ‘X’ drift has a 10Be TCN age of 0.54 kyr, which is 1.3 kyr younger than the independent minimum lichen age of 1.8 kyr. This age difference probably represents the minimum time between formation and early stabilization of the moraine. Contemporary and former equilibrium line altitudes (ELAs) were determined. The ELA depressions for the Muldrow glacial system were 560, 400, 350 and 190 m and for the Peters glacial system 560, 360, 150 and 10 m, based on MP-I through MP-IV moraines, respectively. -
Denali Foundation Statement
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Denali National Park and Preserve Foundation Statement Resource Stewardship Strategy The National Park Service (NPS) directs each park to develop a MISSION STATEMENT Foundation Statement, which for Denali National is a formal description of the park’s core mission and provides Park and Preserve: basic guidance for the decisions to be made about the park—a We protect intact, the foundation for planning and globally significant Denali management. ecosystems, including The Foundation Statement their cultural, aesthetic, for Denali National Park and and wilderness values, Preserve is the park’s most basic document for planning and and ensure opportunities management. It is grounded in for inspiration, education, the park’s legislation and from research, recreation, and knowledge acquired since the park was originally established. It subsistence for this and provides a shared understanding future generations. of what is most important about the park. The legislation used to understand and summarize why Congress and the president created the park—and to build many parts of the Foundation Statement—is included in Appendix A. Denali’s Foundation Statement describes the park’s purpose, significance, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, primary interpretive themes, and special mandates. How to cite this document: National Park Service. 2014. Denali National Park and Preserve Foundation Statement. Denali National Park and Preserve, Denali Park, Alaska. 69 pp. -
Guide to Camping in Denali's Backcountry
National Park Service Denali National Park and Preserve U.S. Department of the Interior Backcountry Camping Guide Michael Larson Photo Getting Started Getting a Permit Leave No Trace and Safety This brochure contains information vital to the success of your Permits are available at the Backcountry Information Center Allow approximately one hour for the permit process, which Camping backcountry trip in Denali National Park and Preserve. The following (BIC) located adjacent to the Wilderness Access Center (WAC). consists of five basic steps: There are no established campsites in the Denali backcountry. Use paragraphs will outline the Denali backcountry permit system, the the following guidelines when selecting your campsite: steps required to obtain your permit, and some important tips for a safe and memorable wilderness experience. • Your tent must be at least 0.5 mi (0.8 km) away from the Step 1: Plan Your Itinerary recognition that you understand all backcountry rules and regu park road and not visible from it or other developed areas. Visit www.nps.gov/dena/planyourvisit/backcountry, and use lations. Violations of the conditions of the permit may result in Denali’s Trailless Wilderness • Camp on durable surfaces whenever possible such as gravel this guide, maps, as well as other available references to pre adverse impacts to park resources and legal consequences. Traveling and camping in this expansive terrain is special. The lack river bars, and avoid damaging fragile tundra. of developed trails, bridges, or campsites means that you are free plan several alternative itineraries prior to your arrival in the to determine your own route and discover Denali for yourself. -
MOUNT Mckinley I Adolph Murie
I (Ie De/;,;;I; D·· 3g>' I \N ITHE :.Tnf,';AGt:: I GRIZZLIES OF !MOUNT McKINLEY I Adolph Murie I I I I I •I I I II I ,I I' I' Ii I I I •I I I Ii I I I I r THE GRIZZLIES OF I MOUNT McKINLEY I I I I I •I I PlEASE RETURN TO: TECHNICAL INfORMATION CENTER I f1r,}lVER SiRV~r.r Gs:t.!TER ON ;j1,l1uNAl PM~ :../,,;ICE I -------- --- For sale h~' the Super!u!p!u]eut of Documents, U.S. Goyernment Printing Office I Washing-ton. D.C. 20402 I I '1I I I I I I I I .1I Adolph Murie on Muldrow Glacier, 1939. I I I I , II I I' I I I THE GRIZZLIES I OF r MOUNT McKINLEY I ,I Adolph Murie I ,I I. I Scientific Monograph Series No. 14 'It I I I U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Washington, D.C. I 1981 I I I As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the,I Interior has responsibility for most ofour nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recre- I ation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Ter- I ritories under U.S. -
The Mount Eielson District Alaska
Please do not destroy or throw away this publication. If you have no further use for it, write to the Geological Survey at Washington and ask for a frank to return it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 849 D THE MOUNT EIELSON DISTRICT ALASKA BY JOHN C. REED Investigations in Alaska Railroad belt, 1931 ( Pages 231-287) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1933 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. - Pricf 25 cents CONTENTS Page Foreword, by Philip S. Smith.______________________________________ v Abstract.._._-_.-_____.___-______---_--_---_-_______._-________ 231 Introduction__________________________-__-_-_-_____._____________.: 231 . Arrangement with the Alaska Railroad._--_--_-_--...:_-_._.--__ 231 Nature of field work..__________________________________... 232 Acknowledgments..._._.-__-_.-_-_----------_-.------.--.__-_. 232 Summary of previous work..___._-_.__-_-_...__._....._._____._ 232 Geography.............._._._._._.-._--_-_---.-.---....__...._._. 233 Location and extent.___-___,__-_---___-__--_-________-________ 233 Routes of approach....__.-_..-_-.---__.__---.--....____._..-_- 234 Topography.................---.-..-.-----------------.------ 234 Relief _________________________________________________ 234 Drainage.-.._.._.___._.__.-._._--.-.-__._-._.__.._._... 238 Climate.---.__________________...................__ 240 Vegetation--.._-____-_____.____._-___._--.._-_-..________.__. 244 Wild animals.__________.__.--.__-._.----._a-.--_.-------_.____ 244 Population._-.____-_.___----_-----__-___.--_--__-_.-_--.___. -
Bering Sea – Western Interior Alaska Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
Bibliography: Bering Sea – Western Interior In support of: Bering Sea – Western Interior Alaska Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Principal Investigator: Juli Braund-Allen Prepared by: Dan Fleming Alaska Resources Library and Information Services 3211 Providence Drive Library, Suite 111 Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Anchorage Field Office 4700 BLM Road Anchorage, AK 99507 September 1, 2008 Bibliography: Bering Sea – Western Interior In Author Format In Support of: Bering Sea – Western Interior Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by: Alaska Resources Library and Information Services September 1, 2008 A.W. Murfitt Company, and Bethel (Alaska). 1984. Summary report : Bethel Drainage management plan, Bethel, Alaska, Project No 84-060.02. Anchorage, Alaska: The Company. A.W. Murfitt Company, Bethel (Alaska), Delta Surveying, and Hydrocon Inc. 1984. Final report : Bethel drainage management plan, Bethel, Alaska, Project No. 83-060.01, Bethel drainage management plan. Anchorage, Alaska: The Company. Aamodt, Paul L., Sue Israel Jacobsen, and Dwight E. Hill. 1979. Uranium hydrogeochemical and stream sediment reconnaissance of the McGrath and Talkeetna NTMS quadrangles, Alaska, including concentrations of forty-three additional elements, GJBX 123(79). Los Alamos, N.M.: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California. Abromaitis, Grace Elizabeth. 2000. A retrospective assessment of primary productivity on the Bering and Chukchi Sea shelves using stable isotope ratios in seabirds. Thesis (M.S.), University of Alaska Fairbanks. Ackerman, Robert E. 1979. Southwestern Alaska Archeological survey 1978 : Akhlun - Eek Mountains region. Pullman, Wash.: Arctic Research Section, Laboratory of Anthropology, Washington State University. ———. 1980. Southwestern Alaska archeological survey, Kagati Lake, Kisarilik-Kwethluk Rivers : a final research report to the National Geographic Society. -
Appendix A. Glossary of Acoustic Terms
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Acoustic Monitoring Report, Denali National Park and Preserve – 2010 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/DENA/NRDS—2013/441 ON THE COVER A soundscape monitoring system collects data on the lateral moraine of the glacier which feeds Ohio Creek, on the south side of the Alaska Range in Denali National Park. NPS Photo by Jared Withers Acoustic Monitoring Report, Denali National Park and Preserve – 2010 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/DENA/NRDS—2013/441 Jared Withers Physical Scientist PO Box 9 Denali National Park, AK 99755 Davyd Betchkal Physical Science Technician PO Box 9 Denali National Park, AK 99755 January 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. -
Denali National Park and Preserve
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Denali National Park and Preserve Denali National Park and Preserve Center for Resources, Science, and Learning NPS Photo by Lucy Tyrrell Summary of Current Resource Projects 2005 Table of Contents Natural Resources ............................................................................................................... 3 Integrated Programs .............................................................................................................. 3 Central Alaska Network (CAKN) and Inventory and Monitoring at Denali........ 3 Proactive Approach to Protecting the Toklat Basin.................................................. 5 Plants........................................................................................................................................ 6 Off-Road Vehicle (ORV) Impacts................................................................................ 6 Long-term Monitoring.................................................................................................. 6 Removal of Exotic (Non-native) Plants ...................................................................... 8 Revegetation of Construction/Disturbed Sites.......................................................... 8 Revegetation .................................................................................................................... 9 Monitoring Dust Palliatives on the Park Road .......................................................... 9 Wildland Fire ....................................................................................................................... -
1991 Mountaineering Summary
DENALI NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE 1991 MOUNTAINEERING SUMMARY The 1991 mountaineering season on Denali began with a rumble as a major earthquake hit the range on April 30th. Measuring 6.1 on the Richter scale, the epicenter was just south of Mount Foraker. Huge avalanches were observed throughout the range, as well as several reports of close calls among climbers. Luckily there were no injuries. The winter of 1990-1991 was another heavy snow year in the Alaska Range. There were no winter attempts made on Mount McKinley. Weather in the spring was generally poor. An abundance of cold and stormy weather turned away most summit attempts until late May when a stretch of stable weather arrived. Still, the success rate remained low until another stretch of good weather in mid to late June brought the success rate up to its normal of 50% to 60%. This year, in order to maintain safe, reliable, and timely air support for high altitude rescues on Mount McKinley, the National Park Service contracted an Aerospatiale Lama helicopter to be stationed in Talkeetna for the mountaineering season. Fortunately the Park Service was able to secure this contract this year, for U.S. Army Chinook helicopters were not available for high altitude rescues as they have been in years past. The Lama was successfully used on five major rescue missions this year. It’s worthiness was especially proven after it completed two successful rescues above 18,000’, one of which required four landings in the “Football Field” at 19,500’. In addition, for the first time in Alaska, the Park Service implemented “short-haul” rescue using the Lama. -
DENALI NATIONAL PARK and PRESERVE 1990 MOUNTAINEERING SUMMARY Heavy Winter Snows, Volcanic Ash Deposits, Near Record Numbers Of
DENALI NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE 1990 MOUNTAINEERING SUMMARY Heavy winter snows, volcanic ash deposits, near record numbers of climbers, few accidents and generally good weather summarizes the 1990 mountaineering season in the Alaska Range. Record snows fell at the lower elevations during the winter of 1989-90. There was one winter attempt made by a Japanese team of four on the West Buttress. They encountered extended periods of poor weather and spent nearly 20 days between the 11,000’ and 14,300’ camps. The 14,300’ basin was their highest camp. No other winter attempts were made on any other major peak within Denali National Park and Preserve. Throughout most of the winter, Mount Redoubt volcano, located approximately 150 miles south of the Alaska Range, repeatedly erupted, lightly dusting the Alaska Range with multiple layers of volcanic ash. A similar scenario occurred in 1986 when Mount Augustine erupted. The dark ash layers, once exposed to radiant heat from the sun, caused greatly accelerated melting of the snow pack as well as uneven melting of the snow surface. This resulted in an early closure of aircraft landing strips on the glaciers. Concern over a repeat of the 1986 early closures was well publicized and a number of groups planning late expeditions to the Alaska Range either moved their trips ahead or cancelled altogether. Late June snows extended the season longer than was expected, nevertheless, flights into the southeast fork stopped after the first several days of July. In an effort to cope with the number of people still on the mountain, landings to pick up parties were authorized at the 9,500’ level on the Kahiltna Glacier. -
Final F-22A Cover.Ai
4.0 TRAINING SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND CONSEQUENCES This chapter contains both the affected environment and environmental consequences analysis for the Proposed Action and No Action Alternative within the training special use airspace associated with Elmendorf Air Force Base (AFB). The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that the analysis address those areas and the components of the environment with the potential to be affected; locations and resources with no potential to be affected need not be analyzed. Each resource discussion begins with a definition including resource attributes and any applicable regulations. The expected geographic scope of potential impacts is also identified as the Region of Influence (ROI). The ROI is defined as the outermost boundary of potential environmental consequences. For most resources in this chapter, the ROI is defined as the lands underlying the Military Operations Areas (MOAs) and Restricted Areas. However, for some resources (such as Air Quality and Socioeconomics), the ROI extends over a larger jurisdiction unique to the resource. The Existing Condition of each relevant environmental resource is described to give the public and agency decision-makers a meaningful point from which they can compare potential future environmental, social, and economic effects. The Environmental Consequences section for each resource considers the direct and indirect effects of the Proposed Action and No Action Alternative described in Chapter 2.0 of this Environmental Assessment (EA). Cumulative effects are discussed in Chapter 5.0. 4.1 Airspace Management 4.1.1 Definition As explained under Section 3.1.1., navigable airspace is a national resource administered by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).