DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 2000)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 2000) The Destruction and Rescue of Jewish Children in Bessarabia, Bukovina, and Transnistria (1941–1944)* Radu Ioanid Approximately one-half of Romania’s prewar Jewish population of 756,000 survived World War II. As a consequence of wartime border changes, 150,000 of the original Jewish population ended up under Hungarian sovereignty in northern Transylvania. In 1944 these Jews were deported to concentration camps and extermination centers in the Greater Reich and nearly all of them—130,000—perished before the end of the war. In Romania proper more than 45,000 Jews—probably closer to 60,000—were killed in Bessarabia and Bukovina by Romanian and German troops during summer and fall 1941. The remaining Jews from Bessarabia and almost all remaining Jews from Bukovina were then deported to Transnistria, where at least 75,000 died. During the postwar trial of Romanian war criminals, Wilhelm Filderman—president of the Federation of Romanian Jewish Communities—declared that at least 150,000 Bessarabian and Bukovinan Jews (those killed in these regions and those deported to Transnistria and killed there) died under the Antonescu regime. In Transnistria at least 130,000 indigenous Jews were liquidated, especially in Odessa and the districts of Golta and Berezovka. In all at least 250,000 Jews under Romanian jurisdiction died, either on the explicit orders of Romanian officials or as a result of their criminal barbarity.1 However, Romanian Zionist leader Misu Benvenisti estimated 270,000,2 the same figure calculated by Raul Hilberg.3 During the Holocaust in Romania, Jews were executed, deported, or killed by forced labor or typhus. Their children also were not spared. MASSACRES OF JEWS IN MILCORENI AND DOROHOI The massacre of Jews in Romania started before it allied itself with Nazi Germany and declared war on the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. Massacres of Jews occurred during the Romanian withdrawal from Bessrabia and northern Bukovina in early July 1940, when the Soviet Union occupied both provinces for one year. Although typically the killings were carried out by soldiers, occasionally they were conducted by Romanian or Ukrainian mobs. The ugliest massacres accompanied the withdrawal from Bukovina; * This article contains material previously published in Radu Ioanid, The Holocaust in Romania: The Destruction of Jews and Gypsies under the Antonescu Regime, 1940–1944 (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, in association with the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 2000). Reprinted with permission. 78 • THE DESTRUCTION AND RESCUE OF JEWISH CHILDREN the first occurred in Milcoreni (department of Dorohoi). Following orders by an officer named Goilav, soldiers seized and abused the family of Sloime Weiner, including his son User and his daughters Roza Weiner and Fani Zekler who was carrying an infant. Leading this group to the Tureatca Forest, the soldiers also caught the lame shoemaker Moscovici, his wife, and their two children, as well as the wife of Isac Moscovici (who was apparently unrelated to the shoemaker and his two young daughters). The mob lined them up in front of a ditch and shot them. Isac Moscovici fell into the soldiers’ hands shortly thereafter and was beaten so badly that he died on the way to the hospital.4 During the same period, a massive pogrom took place in Dorohoi, Moldova, in which over 100 Jews were killed. Children were among the victims: Freida Rudik (aged seven), Tomy Rudik (aged six), Moise Rudik (aged two), and Simion Cohn (aged two), all of whom lived on Regina Maria Street and were shot in the head, chest, or abdomen.5 One hundred twenty Jews were killed in January 1941 when a huge pogrom that was organized and carried out by the Iron Guards engulfed Bucharest. Many Jews died in their own homes. For example, several members of the Fringhieru family— including four children—were murdered in their house at 15 Intrarea Colentina. Two children (Aron and Haia) who were in bed at the time miraculously survived even though several bullets were fired at them.6 The bullet aimed to kill little Rodriques Honores Brickman of 9 Mihai Voda Street, however, did not go astray.7 THE IASI POGROM It is difficult to determine the total number of victims of the Iasi pogrom of June 28–July 2, 1941, but sources vary in estimating between 3,200 and 13,000 victims. Hilberg cites German diplomats in Bucharest who estimated 4,000 dead.8 Curzio Malaparte, a fascist Italian war correspondent who initially justified the pogrom but later condemned it, reported 7,000 victims. 9 Communist historian Gheorghe Zaharia cites documents from the archives of the Ministry of the Interior of the Romanian People’s Republic indicating more than 8,000 victims.10 The indictment of the Antonescu trial accused the pogrom organizers of responsibility for 10,000 deaths, yet a July 23, 1943, Serviciul Special de Informatii report―based on lists of the dead prepared by the Jewish congregations of Iasi―indicated that 13,266 (including forty women and 180 children) died. Cited recently by scholars working in Romania, this figure does not seem exaggerated.11 Radu Ioanid • 79 When the Jews of Iasi were rounded up by Romanian soldiers and civilians and escorted in columns through the town to Central Police Headquarters, men constituted the majority but the victims also included women and children. Beaten and bruised, they were forced to march in step with arms raised above their heads. Their Romanian and German captors and the mobs lining their path spat on the victims, pelted them with rocks and bottles, and struck them with sticks, bars, and rifle butts. Those who could not walk because of injuries or ailments were shot, causing the streets to be strewn with corpses. 12 Survivors of the march later recorded the visions that accompanied their passage. Those who left the 5th Police Precinct at 5:00 p.m. were greeted by the corpse of an old man on Apeduct Street. A few paces beyond was that of a child of the plumber Suchär. In front of the Chamber of Commerce and the Ghemul Verde Store on Cuza-Vodä Street were two heaps of dead people in which they discerned the bodies of women and children.13 Men in military uniforms assembled eighteen or twenty Jews in Sfantu Spiridon Square, forced them to lie on the ground, and then murdered them with a tank’s machine gun.14 Some of the victims are known to us: Kunovici, owner of a hat store on Stefan cel Mare Street; Filip Simionovici, a baker from I. C. Brätianu Street; the engineer Nacht; and the tavern keeper Mille. A rare surviving photograph captures the body of a four- or five-year-old child, a girl, lying among a half-dozen older victims with blood running from her head.15 Thousands of survivors from the Iasi massacre were then loaded onto two “death trains,” so named because more than two thousand people died due to the lack of air and water resulting from the overcrowded conditions. The first train, which left Iasi on the morning of June 30 with 2,530 Jews, arrived at Cälärasi on July 6 with 1,011. The captives had covered approximately 500 kilometers during six and one-half days of tropical heat, for most of that time without water. The train had yielded ten corpses at Märäseti, 654 at Tîrgu-Frumos, 327 at Mircesti, 300 at Säbäoani, 53 at Roman, 40 at Inotesti, and 25 at Cälärasi.16 The total deaths on the first death train thus amounted to at least 1,519 victims. Nathan Goldstein describes the scene that he witnessed from his cattle car in Tîrgu-Frumos. Being so close to water and thirsty for so long, most could not resist: they would jump out through the small opening of the car to go drink the water. Most were murdered by the soldiers: . an eleven-year-old child jumped out the window to get a drink of water, but the [deputy of the train’s military commander] felled him with a shot aimed at his legs. The child screamed: water, water! Then the adjutant took him by his feet, shouting “you want 80 • THE DESTRUCTION AND RESCUE OF JEWISH CHILDREN water? Well, drink all you want!” and lowered him head first into the water of the Bahlui River until the child drowned, and then threw him in.17 One of the survivors of the first death train, Israel Schleier, testified later that only eight children and three old men disembarked from one of the cars in Tîrgu-Frumos. The corpses of the victims remained, however, stiffened in the positions in which they died; “intertwined and immobile, they seemed to form a single . uninterrupted mass.” The stench, Schleier recalled, was unbearable, “a horrible blend of blood, corpses, and feces.”18 The second death train had a briefer history. On June 30 at 6:00 a.m., 1,902 Jews boarded eighteen cars. The last car contained eighty corpses removed at the station in Iasi that showed evidence of killing by gunfire, disemboweling with bayonets, or bludgeoning with sledgehammers. The transport took eight hours to reach its destination at Podul Iloaiei, twenty kilometers from Iasi; it moved so slowly that the guard was sometimes able to follow it on foot. Some cars arrived with as many as 100 dead and as few as three or four half-dead survivors. A prisoner had died (on average) every two or three minutes in some of the wagons. On arrival in Podul Iloaei, the 708 surviving passengers were locked in synagogues or assigned to Jewish residences in the community. The 1,194 dead were buried in the local cemetery.19 The late Radu Florian—who was fourteen years old at that time—survived the journey, but his brother and his father died in the same suffocating cattle car.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trials of the War Criminals
    TRIALS OF THE WAR CRIMINALS General Considerations The Fascist regime that ruled Romania between September 14, 1940, and August 23, 1944, was brought to justice in Bucharest in May 1946, and after a short trial, its principal leaders—Ion and Mihai Antonescu and two of their closest assistants—were executed, while others were sentenced to life imprisonment or long terms of detention. At that time, the trial’s verdicts seemed inevitable, as they indeed do today, derived inexorably from the defendants’ decisions and actions. The People’s Tribunals functioned for a short time only. They were disbanded on June 28, 1946,1 although some of the sentences were not pronounced until sometime later. Some 2,700 cases of suspected war criminals were examined by a commission formed of “public prosecutors,”2 but only in about half of the examined cases did the commission find sufficient evidence to prosecute, and only 668 were sentenced, many in absentia.3 There were two tribunals, one in Bucharest and one in Cluj. It is worth mentioning that the Bucharest tribunal sentenced only 187 people.4 The rest were sentenced by the tribunal in Cluj. One must also note that, in general, harsher sentences were pronounced by the Cluj tribunal (set up on June 22, 1 Marcel-Dumitru Ciucă, “Introducere” in Procesul maresalului Antonescu (Bucharest: Saeculum and Europa Nova, 1995-98), vol. 1: p. 33. 2 The public prosecutors were named by communist Minister of Justice Lucret iu Pătrăşcanu and most, if not all of them were loyal party members, some of whom were also Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe
    Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe Michael Shafir Motto: They used to pour millet on graves or poppy seeds To feed the dead who would come disguised as birds. I put this book here for you, who once lived So that you should visit us no more Czeslaw Milosz Introduction* Holocaust denial in post-Communist East Central Europe is a fact. And, like most facts, its shades are many. Sometimes, denial comes in explicit forms – visible and universally-aggressive. At other times, however, it is implicit rather than explicit, particularistic rather than universal, defensive rather than aggressive. And between these two poles, the spectrum is large enough to allow for a large variety of forms, some of which may escape the eye of all but the most versatile connoisseurs of country-specific history, culture, or immediate political environment. In other words, Holocaust denial in the region ranges from sheer emulation of negationism elsewhere in the world to regional-specific forms of collective defense of national "historic memory" and to merely banal, indeed sometime cynical, attempts at the utilitarian exploitation of an immediate political context.1 The paradox of Holocaust negation in East Central Europe is that, alas, this is neither "good" nor "bad" for the Jews.2 But it is an important part of the * I would like to acknowledge the support of the J. and O. Winter Fund of the Graduate Center of the City University of New York for research conducted in connection with this project. I am indebted to friends and colleagues who read manuscripts of earlier versions and provided comments and corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • A British Reflection: the Relationship Between Dante's Comedy and The
    A British Reflection: the Relationship between Dante’s Comedy and the Italian Fascist Movement and Regime during the 1920s and 1930s with references to the Risorgimento. Keon Esky A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. University of Sydney 2016 KEON ESKY Fig. 1 Raffaello Sanzio, ‘La Disputa’ (detail) 1510-11, Fresco - Stanza della Segnatura, Palazzi Pontifici, Vatican. KEON ESKY ii I dedicate this thesis to my late father who would have wanted me to embark on such a journey, and to my partner who with patience and love has never stopped believing that I could do it. KEON ESKY iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis owes a debt of gratitude to many people in many different countries, and indeed continents. They have all contributed in various measures to the completion of this endeavour. However, this study is deeply indebted first and foremost to my supervisor Dr. Francesco Borghesi. Without his assistance throughout these many years, this thesis would not have been possible. For his support, patience, motivation, and vast knowledge I shall be forever thankful. He truly was my Virgil. Besides my supervisor, I would like to thank the whole Department of Italian Studies at the University of Sydney, who have patiently worked with me and assisted me when I needed it. My sincere thanks go to Dr. Rubino and the rest of the committees that in the years have formed the panel for the Annual Reviews for their insightful comments and encouragement, but equally for their firm questioning, which helped me widening the scope of my research and accept other perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HISTORICAL FINDINGS Statement of Fact and Responsibility The Holocaust was the state-sponsored systematic persecution and annihilation of European Jewry by Nazi Germany, its allies, and collaborators between 1933 and 1945. Not only Jews were victimized during this period. Persecution and mass arrests were perpetrated against ethnic groups such as Sinti and Roma, people with disabilities, political opponents, homosexuals, and others. A significant percentage of the Romanian Jewish community was destroyed during World War II. Systematic killing and deportation were perpetrated against the Jews of Bessarabia, Bukovina, and Dorohoi County. Transnistria, the part of occupied Ukraine under Romanian administration, served Romania as a giant killing field for Jews. The Commission concludes, together with the large majority of bona fide researchers in this field, that the Romanian authorities were the main perpetrators of this Holocaust, in both its planning and implementation. This encompasses the systematic deportation and extermination of nearly all the Jews of Bessarabia and Bukovina as well some Jews from other parts of Romania to Transnistria, the mass killings of Romanian and local Jews in Transnistria, the massive execution of Jews during the Iasi pogrom; the systematic discrimination and degradation applied to Romanian Jews during the Antonescu administration—including the expropriation of assets, dismissal from jobs, the forced evacuation from rural areas and concentration in district capitals and camps, and the massive utilization of Jews as forced laborers under the same administration. Jews were degraded solely on account of their Jewish origin, losing the protection of the state and becoming its victims. A portion of the Roma population of Romania was also subjected to deportation and death in Transnistria.
    [Show full text]
  • Naples and the Nation in Cultural Representations of the Allied Occupation. California Italian Studies, 7(2)
    Glynn, R. (2017). Naples and the Nation in Cultural Representations of the Allied Occupation. California Italian Studies, 7(2). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vp8t8dz Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY-NC Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via University of California at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vp8t8dz . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ UC Berkeley California Italian Studies Title Naples and the Nation in Cultural Representations of the Allied Occupation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vp8t8dz Journal California Italian Studies, 7(2) Author Glynn, Ruth Publication Date 2017-01-01 License CC BY-NC 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Naples and the Nation in Cultural Representations of the Allied Occupation Ruth Glynn The Allied Occupation in 1943–45 represents a key moment in the history of Naples and its relationship with the outside world. The arrival of the American Fifth Army on October 1, 1943 represented the military liberation of the city from both Nazi fascism and starvation, and inaugurated an extraordinary socio-cultural encounter between the international troops of the Allied forces and a war-weary population.
    [Show full text]
  • Dniester Jews Between
    PARALLEL RUPTURES: JEWS OF BESSARABIA AND TRANSNISTRIA BETWEEN ROMANIAN NATIONALISM AND SOVIET COMMUNISM, 1918-1940 BY DMITRY TARTAKOVSKY DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Mark D. Steinberg, Chair Professor Keith Hitchins Professor Diane P. Koenker Professor Harriet Murav Assistant Professor Eugene Avrutin Abstract ―Parallel Ruptures: Jews of Bessarabia and Transnistria between Romanian Nationalism and Soviet Communism, 1918-1940,‖ explores the political and social debates that took place in Jewish communities in Romanian-held Bessarabia and the Moldovan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic during the interwar era. Both had been part of the Russian Pale of Settlement until its dissolution in 1917; they were then divided by the Romanian Army‘s occupation of Bessarabia in 1918 with the establishment of a well-guarded border along the Dniester River between two newly-formed states, Greater Romania and the Soviet Union. At its core, the project focuses in comparative context on the traumatic and multi-faceted confrontation with these two modernizing states: exclusion, discrimination and growing violence in Bessarabia; destruction of religious tradition, agricultural resettlement, and socialist re-education and assimilation in Soviet Transnistria. It examines also the similarities in both states‘ striving to create model subjects usable by the homeland, as well as commonalities within Jewish responses on both sides of the border. Contacts between Jews on either side of the border remained significant after 1918 despite the efforts of both states to curb them, thereby necessitating a transnational view in order to examine Jewish political and social life in borderland regions.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT International Commission on the Holocaust In
    FINAL REPORT of the International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania Presented to Romanian President Ion Iliescu November 11, 2004 Bucharest, Romania NOTE: The English text of this Report is currently in preparation for publication. © International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania. All rights reserved. DISTORTION, NEGATIONISM, AND MINIMALIZATION OF THE HOLOCAUST IN POSTWAR ROMANIA Introduction This chapter reviews and analyzes the different forms of Holocaust distortion, denial, and minimalization in post-World War II Romania. It must be emphasized from the start that the analysis is based on the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s definition of the Holocaust, which Commission members accepted as authoritative soon after the Commission was established. This definition1 does not leave room for doubt about the state-organized participation of Romania in the genocide against the Jews, since during the Second World War, Romania was among those allies and a collaborators of Nazi Germany that had a systematic plan for the persecution and annihilation of the Jewish population living on territories under their unmitigated control. In Romania’s specific case, an additional “target-population” subjected to or destined for genocide was the Romany minority. This chapter will employ an adequate conceptualization, using both updated recent studies on the Holocaust in general and new interpretations concerning this genocide in particular. Insofar as the employed conceptualization is concerned, two terminological clarifications are in order. First, “distortion” refers to attempts to use historical research on the dimensions and significance of the Holocaust either to diminish its significance or to serve political and propagandistic purposes. Although its use is not strictly confined to the Communist era, the term “distortion” is generally employed in reference to that period, during which historical research was completely subjected to controls by the Communist Party’s political censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and Anti-Semitism in an Independent Romania
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Vol 8 No 2 ISSN 2281-3993 July 2019 Interdisciplinary Studies . Research Article © 2019 Giuseppe Motta. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Nationalism and Anti-Semitism in an Independent Romania Giuseppe Motta Doi: 10.2478/ajis-2019-0012 Abstract The history of antisemitism in Romania is strictly connected to the religious and cultural framework of those territories, as well as to their political integration from the age of emancipation and independence to the establishment of a Greater Romania after World War I. This article aims to analyse the different intersections of this historical process and the continuity between the old forms of anti-judaism and their re-interpretation according to modernist dynamics during the first half of the Twentieth-Century. The Romanian case illustrates the transformation and re-adapting of old religious prejudice in new doctrines of xenophobia, nationalism and antisemitism. Keywords: Antisemitism, Anti-Judaism, Nationalism, Romania, Marginalization 1. Introduction. The Birth of Romania and the Question of Citizenship When studying Romanian contemporary history, a scholar is inevitably destined to meet with the question of anti-Semitism and the Jewish conditions in Romania. This is quite obvious when considering the interwar years or the Second World War, but a serious analysis could not help focusing attention on the previous century, when Romania became independent. This State was formed by two Romanian principalities, Wallachia and Moldavia, which had been under Ottoman sovereignty until the nineteenth century, when they fell under Russian influence and experienced the national awakening that led to the 1848 revolution in Wallachia and to the first union under Alexandru Ioan Cuza in 1859 (Georgescu 1992; Hitchins 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Arizona
    Erskine Caldwell, Margaret Bourke- White, and the Popular Front (Moscow 1941) Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Caldwell, Jay E. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 10:56:28 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/316913 ERSKINE CALDWELL, MARGARET BOURKE-WHITE, AND THE POPULAR FRONT (MOSCOW 1941) by Jay E. Caldwell __________________________ Copyright © Jay E. Caldwell 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Jay E. Caldwell, titled “Erskine Caldwell, Margaret Bourke-White, and the Popular Front (Moscow 1941),” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Dissertation Director: Jerrold E. Hogle _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Daniel F. Cooper Alarcon _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Jennifer L. Jenkins _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Robert L. McDonald _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Charles W. Scruggs Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Fascist Lies
    A Brief History of Fascist Lies Federico Finchelstein UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS A Brief History of Fascist Lies A Brief History of Fascist Lies Federico Finchelstein UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS University of California Press Oakland, California © 2020 by Federico Finchelstein Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Finchelstein, Federico, 1975– author. Title: A brief history of fascist lies / Federico Finchelstein. Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2020] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2019052243 (print) | LCCN 2019052244 (ebook) | ISBN 9780520346710 (cloth) | ISBN 9780520975835 (epub) Subjects: LCSH: Fascism—History—20th century. Classification: LCC JC481 .F5177 2020 (print) | LCC JC481 (ebook) | DDC 320.53/3—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019052243 LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019052244 Manufactured in the United States of America 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 A Lucia, Gabi, y Laura Contents Introduction 1 1. On Fascist Lies 11 2. Truth and Mythology in the History of Fascism 20 3. Fascism Incarnate 28 4. Enemies of the Truth? 33 5. Truth and Power 40 6. Revelations 49 7. The Fascist Unconscious 58 8. Fascism against Psychoanalysis 65 9. Democracy and Dictatorship 75 10. The Forces of Destruction 85 Epilogue: The Populist War against History 91 Acknowledgments 107 Notes 109 Index 135 Introduction What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening. DONALD J. TRUMP, 2018 Since then, a struggle between the truth and the lie has been taking place.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian-German Relations Before and During the Holocaust
    ROMANIAN-GERMAN RELATIONS BEFORE AND DURING THE HOLOCAUST Introduction It was a paradox of the Second World War that Ion Antonescu, well known to be pro- Occidental, sided with Germany and led Romania in the war against the Allies. Yet, Romania’s alliance with Germany occurred against the background of the gradually eroding international order established at the end of World War I. Other contextual factors included the re-emergence of Germany as a great power after the rise of the National Socialist government and the growing involvement of the Soviet Union in European international relations. In East Central Europe, the years following the First World War were marked by a rise in nationalism characterized by strained relations between the new nation-states and their ethnic minorities.1 At the same time, France and England were increasingly reluctant to commit force to uphold the terms of the Versailles Treaty, and the Comintern began to view ethnic minorities as potential tools in the “anti-imperialist struggle.”2 In 1920, Romania had no disputes with Germany, while its eastern border was not recognized by the Soviet Union. Romanian-German Relations during the Interwar Period In the early twenties, relations between Romania and Germany were dominated by two issues: the reestablishment of bilateral trade and German reparations for war damages incurred during the World War I German occupation. The German side was mainly interested in trade, whereas the Romanian side wanted first to resolve the conflict over reparations. A settlement was reached only in 1928. The Berlin government acted very cautiously at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Roots of Romanian Antisemitism
    BACKGROUND AND PRECURSORS TO THE HOLOCAUST Roots of Romanian Antisemitism The League of National Christian Defense and Iron Guard Antisemitism The Antisemitic Policies of the Goga Government and of the Royal Dictatorship The Roots of Romanian Antisemitism The roots of Romanian antisemitism are intertwined with the origins of the modern Romanian state and the emergence of the rich national cultural tradition that accompanied unification of the principalities, independence, and the creation of Greater Romania. The antisemitism that manifested itself in Romania between the two world wars grew directly from seeds sewn at the major turning points of the country’s development starting in the mid- nineteenth century. For reasons that may have differed from person to person or group to group, strong antisemitic currents were present in various forms and with varying intensity in the political, cultural and spiritual life of Romanian society for most of the century that preceded the accession to power of the National Christian Party in 1937, the installation of the Royal Dictatorship in 1938, and the Antonescu-Iron Guard National Legionary State in 1940—that is, for most of the century that culminated in the Holocaust. The antisemitic actions of that succession of governments drew inspiration from antisemitic themes that had entered the Romanian lexicon of ideas long before the 1930s and long before the Nazi rise to influence and then power in Germany. While each of these three governing configurations mixed the essential elements of widespread antisemitic concepts somewhat differently—leaning more or less heavily on certain themes, perhaps adding to native concepts notions adapted from non-Romanian antisemitic expression, and advocating sometimes greater and sometimes lesser violence to accomplish their goals—they all represented essential continuity with Romanian antisemitic ideas that had their origins in the pre-World War I era.
    [Show full text]