Resume Wizard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resume Wizard Expressive Culture: Film Class Code CORE-UA 9750 – 001 Instructor Dr Anne Barnes Details [email protected] Consultations by appointment. Please allow at least 24 hours for your instructor to respond to your emails. Class Details Spring 2016 Expressive Culture: Film Monday 3:00 – 7:00pm (4 hours per week including film screening) February 1 to May 9 Room 302 NYU Sydney Academic Centre 157-161 Gloucester St, The Rocks 2000 Prerequisites None Class How has Australian cinema engaged with significant and often contested historical, political Description and cultural events in the nation’s past? The films in this course offer critical perspectives on the history of colonisation in Australia; the legacies of the Stolen Generations; the controversies surrounding Australia’s role in World War One; as well as Australia’s relationships with its Pacific Asian neighbours. We will focus on films that have marked significant shifts in public consciousness about the past such as Gallipoli (1981), Rabbit-Proof Fence (2002) and Balibo (2009). We will also draw on films that have employed innovative narrative and aesthetic strategies for exploring the relationship between the past and the present such as Ten Canoes (2006) and The Tracker (2002). Throughout the course, students will develop their understanding of the basic methods and concepts of cinema studies. In particular, students will develop a critical vocabulary for analysing how filmmakers have approached the use of memory, testimony, re-enactment, researched detail, allegory and archives across a diverse range of examples. Desired By the end of the course students will be able to: Outcomes • Apply the basic vocabulary of film form. • Grasp the mechanics of structuring a written argument about a film’s meaning. Page 1 of 13 Expressive Culture: Film • Engage with different approaches to thinking and writing about cinema and film. • Reflect upon their viewing position and their application of interpretive strategies to films from diverse historical and cultural contexts. • Utilize a critical vocabulary for analysing representations of the relationship between the past and the present on film. • Critically analyse the ways that representations of the past shape and are shaped by their historical, political and cultural contexts. • Research and investigate aspects of the Australian cinema and communicate their findings in a coherent, well-structured written form. • Situate contemporary Australian cinema in its national, regional and international contexts. Assessment Class Participation: (10%) Assessed throughout the semester. Components Sequence Analysis: 4-6 pages (20%) Due in class Week 6. Critical Paper: 4-6 pages (20%) Due in class Week 11. Proposal for Final Paper: 2-3 pages (10%) Due in class Week 13. Final Paper: 10-12 pages (40%) Due in class Week 15. Class Participation Students are required to demonstrate accountability and responsibility in their preparation for, and engagement with, the course. Students are expected to engage in active discussion and to listen to and respect other points of view. Students will receive a midterm participation grade, worth half of you total participation grade, after the first seven weeks of classes. Sequence Analysis (Week 6) Students will identify a sequence from a film presented in the first six weeks of the course and critically analyse how the sequence reflects key themes, issues, concepts and/or aesthetic strategies introduced in Weeks 1 - 6. Students will pay close attention to the formal (stylistic and technical) qualities of the sequence, demonstrating their understanding of the specificities of film form, style and narration. Critical Paper (Week 11) Students will select two readings from the selection provided by the instructor and write a short critical essay in which they identify and analyze the key arguments, ideas, concepts and issues raised by the authors. Students will compare the arguments of the different authors and offer their own assessment of the authors’ claims and conclusions. The paper should be written in an appropriate academic style with consistent scholarly referencing and bibliography. This assignment will help to develop students’ critical reading, thinking and writing skills, essential for the final paper in this course. Proposal for Final Paper (Week 13) Students will submit a proposal indicating how they intend to approach their chosen question. Page 2 of 13 Expressive Culture: Film Final Paper (Week 15) Questions for the final papers will be released in Week 11. Students are required to apply their analysis to specific, carefully selected case studies and film examples and to demonstrate their critical thinking, analysis and evaluation skills. Students are expected to situate their argument in relation to the relevant required readings and undertake additional research and reading on their topic. Failure to submit or fulfill any required course component will result in failure of the class. Assessment The College Core Curriculum is designed to provide students with an intellectually rigorous Expectations general education in the liberal arts. Because Core courses seek to stretch you beyond your previous schooling and major course of study, they will likely be among the most academically challenging experiences you undertake as an undergraduate. The following guidelines outline our common expectations concerning the evaluation of students’ work across the curriculum. The grade of A marks extraordinary academic performance in all aspects of a course and is reserved for clearly superior work. As a faculty, we are similarly concerned to reserve the mark of B+ to signify very good work. It is our hope and desire that the majority of students will want and be able to do good work in their Core classes, work in the B range. Because these courses are intended by design to foster your intellectual development, the difference between merely satisfactory and good work will frequently depend on outstanding effort and class participation. For this reason, class participation is typically a substantial component of the overall grade in Core courses. The grade of C denotes satisfactory work—regular attendance, ordinary effort, a minimum of demonstrated improvement across the semester. It is expected that every student is capable of and motivated to perform at least at this level. Grades below C are reserved for less than satisfactory and, in the D range, for poor work and effort, and mark a need for improvement. The grade of F indicates failure to complete the requirements for a course in a creditable manner. It marks a judgment about the quality and quantity of a student’s work and participation—not about the student—and is therefore in order whenever a student fails to complete course requirements, whatever his or her intentions or circumstances may be. The temporary mark of I (Incomplete) is given only when sudden and incapacitating illness, or other grave emergency, prevents a student from completing the final assignment or examination for a course. It must be requested by the student in advance; all other course requirements, including satisfactory attendance, must have been fulfilled; and there must be a reasonable expectation that the student will receive a passing grade when the delayed work is completed. Students must make arrangements with the faculty member to finish the incomplete work as soon as circumstances permit within the following semester. If not completed, marks of I will lapse to F. Page 3 of 13 Expressive Culture: Film Grade This course uses the following scale of numerical equivalents to letter grades: Conversion A = 94-100 C+ = 77-79 A- = 90-93 C = 74-76 C- = 70-73 B+ = 87-89 B = 84-86 D+ = 67-69 B- = 80-83 D = 65-66 F = below 65 Submission of Should work be submitted as a hard copy, or electronically? Work Unless otherwise specified, all written work must be submitted as a hard copy. The majority of written assignments must also be submitted electronically via NYU Classes. All in-class presentations must be completed during class time. Who may submit a student’s work? Each student’s assigned work must be handed in personally by that student. The student may not nominate another person to act on his/her behalf. When and where should the work be submitted? The hard copy of any written work must be submitted to the instructor at the beginning of class on the date the work is due. If the assignment due date falls outside of class time, work must be submitted to the Staff Member on duty in Room 2.04 during prescribed Office Hours (11:30am-12:30pm and 2:30-3:30pm Mon-Thu), or by appointment with the Academic Programs Coordinator. Each submitted item of work received in Room 2.04 will be date and time stamped in the presence of the student. Work submitted in Room 2.04 will not be considered “received” unless formally stamped. What is the Process for Late Submission of Work? After the due date, work may only be submitted under the following conditions: • Late work, even if an extension has been granted, must be submitted in person by appointment with the Academic Programs Coordinator. Each submitted item of work must be date and time stamped in order to be considered “received”. • Work submitted after the submission time without an agreed extension receives a penalty of 2 points on the 100-point scale (for the assignment) for each day the work is late. Written work submitted beyond five weekdays after the submission date without an agreed extension receives a mark of zero, and the student is not entitled to feedback for that piece of work. • Because failure to submit or fulfil any required course component will result in failure of the course, it is crucial for students to submit every assignment even when it will receive a mark of zero. Early departure from the program therefore places the student at risk of failing the course.
Recommended publications
  • Bruce Beresford's Breaker Morant Re-Viewed
    FILMHISTORIA Online Vol. 30, núm. 1 (2020) · ISSN: 2014-668X The Boers and the Breaker: Bruce Beresford’s Breaker Morant Re-Viewed ROBERT J. CARDULLO University of Michigan Abstract This essay is a re-viewing of Breaker Morant in the contexts of New Australian Cinema, the Boer War, Australian Federation, the genre of the military courtroom drama, and the directing career of Bruce Beresford. The author argues that the film is no simple platitudinous melodrama about military injustice—as it is still widely regarded by many—but instead a sterling dramatization of one of the most controversial episodes in Australian colonial history. The author argues, further, that Breaker Morant is also a sterling instance of “telescoping,” in which the film’s action, set in the past, is intended as a comment upon the world of the present—the present in this case being that of a twentieth-century guerrilla war known as the Vietnam “conflict.” Keywords: Breaker Morant; Bruce Beresford; New Australian Cinema; Boer War; Australian Federation; military courtroom drama. Resumen Este ensayo es una revisión del film Consejo de guerra (Breaker Morant, 1980) desde perspectivas como la del Nuevo Cine Australiano, la guerra de los boers, la Federación Australiana, el género del drama en una corte marcial y la trayectoria del realizador Bruce Beresford. El autor argumenta que la película no es un simple melodrama sobre la injusticia militar, como todavía es ampliamente considerado por muchos, sino una dramatización excelente de uno de los episodios más controvertidos en la historia colonial australiana. El director afirma, además, que Breaker Morant es también una excelente instancia de "telescopio", en el que la acción de la película, ambientada en el pasado, pretende ser una referencia al mundo del presente, en este caso es el de una guerra de guerrillas del siglo XX conocida como el "conflicto" de Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dark New World : Anatomy of Australian Horror Films
    A dark new world: Anatomy of Australian horror films Mark David Ryan Faculty of Creative Industries, Queensland University of Technology A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the degree Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), December 2008 The Films (from top left to right): Undead (2003); Cut (2000); Wolf Creek (2005); Rogue (2007); Storm Warning (2006); Black Water (2007); Demons Among Us (2006); Gabriel (2007); Feed (2005). ii KEY WORDS Australian horror films; horror films; horror genre; movie genres; globalisation of film production; internationalisation; Australian film industry; independent film; fan culture iii ABSTRACT After experimental beginnings in the 1970s, a commercial push in the 1980s, and an underground existence in the 1990s, from 2000 to 2007 contemporary Australian horror production has experienced a period of strong growth and relative commercial success unequalled throughout the past three decades of Australian film history. This study explores the rise of contemporary Australian horror production: emerging production and distribution models; the films produced; and the industrial, market and technological forces driving production. Australian horror production is a vibrant production sector comprising mainstream and underground spheres of production. Mainstream horror production is an independent, internationally oriented production sector on the margins of the Australian film industry producing titles such as Wolf Creek (2005) and Rogue (2007), while underground production is a fan-based, indie filmmaking subculture, producing credit-card films such as I know How Many Runs You Scored Last Summer (2006) and The Killbillies (2002). Overlap between these spheres of production, results in ‘high-end indie’ films such as Undead (2003) and Gabriel (2007) emerging from the underground but crossing over into the mainstream.
    [Show full text]
  • The Workshop Film Group – a History 1968 – 2018
    The Workshop Film Group – A History 1968 – 2018 THE WORKSHOP FILM GROUP A History 1968 - 2018 By Richard Keys, John Lanser and Michael O’Rourke Dedicated to Vi & Laurie Collings and Helen Ramsay. With thanks to all of our members who have contributed so much over the journey. Clockwise from top left: Helen Ramsay, Vi Collings, Laurie Collings First published by the Workshop Film Group, 2018 Workshop Arts Centre, 33 Laurel St, Willoughby, NSW www.workshopfilmgroup.net Copyright © Richard Keys, John Lanser and Michael O’Rourke, 2018 Compiled by Ian Grey 16 July 2018 Printed and bound by Forestville Printing, E4/15 Narabang Way, Belrose, NSW 2085 Page | 1 The Workshop Film Group – A History 1968 – 2018 CONTENTS Background 3 Birth of a film society 4 Programming 5 Technical challenges and significant steps forward 6 Residential film weekends 7 Non-residential film weekends 10 The sound of silents 10 Another dollar, Another Day 12 The Group logo 13 Special guests 14 Committee and membership 19 Appendix 1. Filmography 21 Appendix 2. Milestones 22 Appendix 3. Press clippings 23 Appendix 4 Programs 29 Page | 2 The Workshop Film Group – A History 1968 – 2018 BACKGROUND The Workshop Arts Centre (WAC), established by the artist and teacher Joy Ewart, was officially opened by Australian artist Hal Missingham on August 16, 1963. Prior to this Joy had run an art studio in a two-storey building - a former stable with overhead loft - in Dalton Street, Chatswood. Classes were held there from 1955 until 1961 when the Willoughby Council declared the premises unfit for occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • David Stratton's Stories of Australian Cinema
    David Stratton’s Stories of Australian Cinema With thanks to the extraordinary filmmakers and actors who make these films possible. Presenter DAVID STRATTON Writer & Director SALLY AITKEN Producers JO-ANNE McGOWAN JENNIFER PEEDOM Executive Producer MANDY CHANG Director of Photography KEVIN SCOTT Editors ADRIAN ROSTIROLLA MARK MIDDIS KARIN STEININGER HILARY BALMOND Sound Design LIAM EGAN Composer CAITLIN YEO Line Producer JODI MADDOCKS Head of Arts MANDY CHANG Series Producer CLAUDE GONZALES Development Research & Writing ALEX BARRY Legals STEPHEN BOYLE SOPHIE GODDARD SC SALLY McCAUSLAND Production Manager JODIE PASSMORE Production Co-ordinator KATIE AMOS Researchers RACHEL ROBINSON CAMERON MANION Interview & Post Transcripts JESSICA IMMER Sound Recordists DAN MIAU LEO SULLIVAN DANE CODY NICK BATTERHAM Additional Photography JUDD OVERTON JUSTINE KERRIGAN STEPHEN STANDEN ASHLEIGH CARTER ROBB SHAW-VELZEN Drone Operators NICK ROBINSON JONATHAN HARDING Camera Assistants GERARD MAHER ROB TENCH MARK COLLINS DREW ENGLISH JOSHUA DANG SIMON WILLIAMS NICHOLAS EVERETT ANTHONY RILOCAPRO LUKE WHITMORE Hair & Makeup FERN MADDEN DIANE DUSTING NATALIE VINCETICH BELINDA MOORE Post Producers ALEX BARRY LISA MATTHEWS Assistant Editors WAYNE C BLAIR ANNIE ZHANG Archive Consultant MIRIAM KENTER Graphics Designer THE KINGDOM OF LUDD Production Accountant LEAH HALL Stills Photographers PETER ADAMS JAMIE BILLING MARIA BOYADGIS RAYMOND MAHER MARK ROGERS PETER TARASUIK Post Production Facility DEFINITION FILMS SYDNEY Head of Post Production DAVID GROSS Online Editor
    [Show full text]
  • J I N D a B Y N
    A film by Ray Lawrence Laura Linney Gabriel Byrne j i n d a b y n e Canadian Distribution Mongrel Media 1028 Queen Street West Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J 1H6 Tel: 416-516-9775 Fax: 416-516-0651 E-mail: [email protected] www.mongrelmedia.com Canadian Publicity Bonne Smith Star PR Tel: 416-488-4436 Fax: 416-488-8438 E-mail: [email protected] Press Book April Films Design & Artwork Halcyon Pratt Stills Photography Anthony Browell, Matt Nettheim, John Tsiavis On Set at Jindabyne Catherine Mckinnon © April Films (Jindabyne) Pty Ltd 2006 j i n d a b y n e A film by Ray Lawrence 4 SYNOPSIS Synopsis On an annual fishing trip, in isolated all of this which disturbs her deeply. high country, Stewart, Carl, Rocco and Stewart is not convinced that he has Billy (‘the Kid’) find a girl’s body in the done anything wrong. Claire’s faith in river. It’s too late in the day for them to her relationship with her husband is hike back to the road and report their shaken to the core. tragic find. Next morning, instead of making the long trek back, they spend The fishermen, their wives and their the day fishing. Their decision to stay on children are suddenly haunted by their at the river is a little mysterious—almost own bad spirits. As public opinion builds as if the place itself is exerting some against the actions of the men, their kind of magic over them. certainty about themselves and the deci- sion they made at the river is challenged.
    [Show full text]
  • Redirected from Films Considered the Greatest Ever) Page Semi-Protected This List Needs Additional Citations for Verification
    List of films considered the best From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Films considered the greatest ever) Page semi-protected This list needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be chall enged and removed. (November 2008) While there is no general agreement upon the greatest film, many publications an d organizations have tried to determine the films considered the best. Each film listed here has been mentioned in a notable survey, whether a popular poll, or a poll among film reviewers. Many of these sources focus on American films or we re polls of English-speaking film-goers, but those considered the greatest withi n their respective countries are also included here. Many films are widely consi dered among the best ever made, whether they appear at number one on each list o r not. For example, many believe that Orson Welles' Citizen Kane is the best mov ie ever made, and it appears as #1 on AFI's Best Movies list, whereas The Shawsh ank Redemption is #1 on the IMDB Top 250, whilst Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back is #1 on the Empire magazine's Top 301 List. None of the surveys that produced these citations should be viewed as a scientif ic measure of the film-watching world. Each may suffer the effects of vote stack ing or skewed demographics. Internet-based surveys have a self-selected audience of unknown participants. The methodology of some surveys may be questionable. S ometimes (as in the case of the American Film Institute) voters were asked to se lect films from a limited list of entries.
    [Show full text]
  • What Killed Australian Cinema & Why Is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving?
    What Killed Australian Cinema & Why is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving? A Thesis Submitted By Jacob Zvi for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne © Jacob Zvi 2019 Swinburne University of Technology All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. II Abstract In 2004, annual Australian viewership of Australian cinema, regularly averaging below 5%, reached an all-time low of 1.3%. Considering Australia ranks among the top nations in both screens and cinema attendance per capita, and that Australians’ biggest cultural consumption is screen products and multi-media equipment, suggests that Australians love cinema, but refrain from watching their own. Why? During its golden period, 1970-1988, Australian cinema was operating under combined private and government investment, and responsible for critical and commercial successes. However, over the past thirty years, 1988-2018, due to the detrimental role of government film agencies played in binding Australian cinema to government funding, Australian films are perceived as under-developed, low budget, and depressing. Out of hundreds of films produced, and investment of billions of dollars, only a dozen managed to recoup their budget. The thesis demonstrates how ‘Australian national cinema’ discourse helped funding bodies consolidate their power. Australian filmmaking is defined by three ongoing and unresolved frictions: one external and two internal. Friction I debates Australian cinema vs. Australian audience, rejecting Australian cinema’s output, resulting in Frictions II and III, which respectively debate two industry questions: what content is produced? arthouse vs.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Films Considered the Best
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read View source View history Search List of films considered the best From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page This list needs additional citations for verification. Please Contents help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Featured content Current events Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November Random article 2008) Donate to Wikipedia Wikimedia Shop While there is no general agreement upon the greatest film, many publications and organizations have tried to determine the films considered the best. Each film listed here has been mentioned Interaction in a notable survey, whether a popular poll, or a poll among film reviewers. Many of these sources Help About Wikipedia focus on American films or were polls of English-speaking film-goers, but those considered the Community portal greatest within their respective countries are also included here. Many films are widely considered Recent changes among the best ever made, whether they appear at number one on each list or not. For example, Contact page many believe that Orson Welles' Citizen Kane is the best movie ever made, and it appears as #1 Tools on AFI's Best Movies list, whereas The Shawshank Redemption is #1 on the IMDB Top 250, whilst What links here Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back is #1 on the Empire magazine's Top 301 List. Related changes None of the surveys that produced these citations should be viewed as a scientific measure of the Upload file Special pages film-watching world. Each may suffer the effects of vote stacking or skewed demographics.
    [Show full text]
  • C I N E M a G • , R a D E NEW 5 • Smith to Top Famous Post in 'QC I~!~~ F~~ ~~Y~,U~On~~!~,!
    c I N E M A G • , R A D E NEW 5 • Smith to top Famous post in 'QC I~!~~ _f~~ ~~Y~,u~on~~!~,!. the tentative trial date set to parently been the) qttalyst MONTREAL - The controversy guage other than French as tion to the Parisien Cinema in resolve the dispute between which caused Duke to go to surrounding Roland Smith's quickly as possible; to play a Montreal and a redevelopment Daryl Duke and Izzy Asper Asper for financial assistance in sale of the Outremont Theatre more active role in promoting of the Palace Cinema also on was temporarily forgotten at a Quebec-made films, and to St.Catherine Street. over control of Vancouver In- the first place. dependent Television station CRTC license approval was recent press conference when prepare an inventory of short Over 20 more Cinemas Unis CKVU. one of the conditions of the Smith, in his new role as vice­ films from Quebec for expo­ theatres will be equipped with On February 13, of this year, sale agreement but before the president of Cinemas Unis/ sure through its network of Dolby stereo in 1987-1988 United Theatres, outlined ex­ theatres. and six theatres will be equip­ the CRTC approved transfer of CRTC began its July 1986 tensive theatre renovation Smith also took apparent de­ ped to show 70mm films. control of the station from hearings, the transfer of con­ plans for Quebec. light in assuring his audience Western Approaches Ltd. trol was again being disputed As senior executive of the that repertory and art cinema Cinemas Unis will publish whose prinCipal shareholders by Duke and K1enman.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnographic Film-Making in Australia: the First Seventy Years
    ETHNOGRAPHIC FILM-MAKING IN AUSTRALIA THE FIRST SEVENTY YEARS (1898-1968) Ian Dunlop Ethnographic film-making is almost as old as cinema itself.1 In 187 7 Edison, in America, perfected his phonograph, the world’s first machine for recording sound — on fragile wax cylinders. He then started experimenting with ways of producing moving pictures. Others in England and France were also experimenting at the same time. Amongst these were the Lumiere brothers of Paris. In 1895 they perfected a projection machine and gave the world’s first public screening. The cinema was born. The same year Felix-Louis Renault filmed a Wolof woman from west Africa making pots at the Exposition Ethnographique de l’Afrique Occidentale in Paris.2 Three years later ethnographic film was being shot in the Torres Strait Islands just north of mainland Australia. This was in 1898 when Alfred Cort Haddon, an English zoologist and anthro­ pologist, mounted his Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to the Torres Strait. His recording equipment included a wax cylinder sound recorder and a Lumiere camera. The technical genius of the expedition, and the man who apparently used the camera, was Anthony Wilkin.3 It is not known how much film he shot; unfortunately only about four minutes of it still exists. It is the first known ethnographic film to be shot in the field anywhere in the world. It is of course black and white, shot on one of the world’s first cameras, with a handle you had to turn to make the film go rather shakily around. The fragment we have shows several rather posed shots of men dancing and another of men attempting to make fire by friction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cinema of Giorgio Mangiamele
    WHO IS BEHIND THE CAMERA? The cinema of Giorgio Mangiamele Silvana Tuccio Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2009 School of Culture and Communication The University of Melbourne Who is behind the camera? Abstract The cinema of independent film director Giorgio Mangiamele has remained in the shadows of Australian film history since the 1960s when he produced a remarkable body of films, including the feature film Clay, which was invited to the Cannes Film Festival in 1965. This thesis explores the silence that surrounds Mangiamele’s films. His oeuvre is characterised by a specific poetic vision that worked to make tangible a social reality arising out of the impact with foreignness—a foreign society, a foreign country. This thesis analyses the concept of the foreigner as a dominant feature in the development of a cinematic language, and the extent to which the foreigner as outsider intersects with the cinematic process. Each of Giorgio Mangiamele’s films depicts a sharp and sensitive picture of the dislocated figure, the foreigner apprehending the oppressive and silencing forces that surround his being whilst dealing with a new environment; at the same time the urban landscape of inner suburban Melbourne and the natural Australian landscape are recreated in the films. As well as the international recognition given to Clay, Mangiamele’s short films The Spag and Ninety-Nine Percent won Australian Film Institute awards. Giorgio Mangiamele’s films are particularly noted for their style. This thesis explores the cinematic aesthetic, visual style and language of the films.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema in New Zealand
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. A Necessary Fiction: the Ritualisation of Stakeholder Practices in New Zealand Cinema A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Philosophy at The University of Waikato by Megan Jane Davies _______________ University of Waikato 2011 ABSTRACT This thesis argues that stability of the concept ‘national cinema’ is located in the discursive positioning of individual films in such a way that they are connected to a national ‘common ground’, one which is ritually accessed via engagement with media such as cinema. This positioning, however, is not quantifiable and may not be identified as arising from any particular production practice, dimension of popularity, theme, style, characteristic of production personnel, and so on. By synthesising the work of several theorists and applying this synthesis to a selection of films, a framework of ideas (around the ritualised ‘flagging’ of the national via the expression of stakeholder interests) is applied to cinema in New Zealand.
    [Show full text]