DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF (Volume 2)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF (Volume 2) Durham E-Theses Mycenaean trade with the east Mediterranean Gilmore, John How to cite: Gilmore, John (1977) Mycenaean trade with the east Mediterranean, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10372/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ACKNOSLEDGEHENTS FOR PHOTOGRAPHS Plate 1 1. M P L Plate II. 2. 2. P L Flate II. 5,6,7- 3- M P L Plate III. 3,5- !+. U P L Plate IV. 14,15. Pla te 2 1. !.i P L Plate VII. 4,5- 2. !.! P L Plate VIII. 9,10,11. 3- U P L Plate IX. 3- 4- !.! PL Flate XIII. 16,17,10,19 5- U P L Plate XIII. 4,5- 1. Hankey. LiSlan-res St-Josenh 46 (1970), p.23 Fig.l (b). 2.. Hankey. MSlanf;es St-Joseoh 46 (1970), p.23 Fig.l (a). 3- I.-I P L Plate XV. 7,0,9- 4- KPL Plats XIV. 3,4,5,6,7- Plate 4 1- G B A Plate XLV. A. 2. IJ P L Plats XVIII. 1,2. Plato 5 1. G. Loud. The Me/addo Ivories. Chicago, 1539- Plate 54. 2o2 2. G. Loud. The: Me/;iddo Ivories. Chicago, 1939. Plate 10. 42. 3. G. Loud. The ;.ie,riddo Ivories. Chicago, 1939. Plate lb. 10? 4. G B A Plate XXXVII. D. Plate 6 1. Aegean and the Orient. Flato XXII. F,C-,J. 2. G B A Plate XXXIX. 3. 3. G B A Plate XXXVII. C. Plate 7 1. Royal Tonbs Fig.7?. 2. New Tonbs Fig.27. 3. & B A Plate XLVIII. C. & 3 A Plate XLVIII. D. Pl&te 8 1. C B V/ Plate 49- d. 2. Yaraauchi. Greece and Babylon Fig. 17. >I3 15' 1 El Arish 2 Kom Firin 3 Mostai Heliopolis 5k Abusir 6 Saqqara 7 Memphis 8 Riqqe 9 Lahun 10 Gurob 11 Sedment 12 Zawyat el Amwat 13 Tell el Ainarna 1/,. Asyut 15 Rife 16 Balabish. 17 Abydos 18 Naqada 19 Thebes 20 Gourne 21 Armaiit 22 Aswan MAP 5 EGYPT Distribution of iMycenaean Pottery 1 CarchGmish 2 Tell Atchana (Alalakh) 3 Sabouni 4 Khan Sheikhoun 5 Raa Shamra (Ugarit) 6 Lattakie 7 Hama 8 Tell Sukas Q Qatna id Tell Kazel in. Qadesh 12 Byblos 13 Tell el Ghassil 14 Tell Ain Sherif 15 Beirut 16 Gharifeh 17 Kamed el Loz n3 18 Si don 19 Sarafend (Sarepta) lb 20 Tell es Salihiyeh 21 Deir Khabie j in to 22 Hazor 23 Acre 24 Tell Dan 25 Tell Ashari 26 Tell Abu Hav/ara 27 Tell Affuleh 28 Megiddo 29 Tell Taanek • 30 Beth Shan (Beisan) 31 Tabaqat Fahil (Pella) 32 Jatt 33 Dothan 34 Tell es Saidiyeh 35 Tell el Farah 36 Balata (Shechera) 37 Doir Alia 38 Tell Jerisheh 39 Te.U Zippor 40 Beitin (Bethel) 41 Dhahrat el Humraiya 42 Amman 43 Gezer 44 ill Jib (Gibeon) 45 Jericho 46 Jerusalem 47 Ashdod • V ' ' 48 Ain Shems 49 Madeba 50 Tell es Safiyeh1 51 Askalon 52 Lachish 53 Tell el Hesi • 54 Hebron . MAP 4 SYRIA AND PALESTINE 55 Tell el Ajjul (Gaza)' 56 Tell Beit Mirsira 57 Tell Jemmeh (Gerar) •>>• Distribution of Mycenaean Pottery 50 Tell Fara (Beth .Pelet) a Tarsus b Kazanli c Mersin 0 < VI ul t2 i- 03 3 4 Hi CO 0) CO P-i 0) 0) 4 j rl in in V) Hi 03 a H (1) ci -P to nl Ei CO -H -rt -H CO H crt J tl O HI TJ R Ij 4 HfflriahUf!(!)ft<9 > CO -H -H Q rl ;i Ti 51 S p HI O 10 P 'd tl >s Pi (3 O O CO r I-I f-i o rtj a> ft! o) P! rCl el f-i «>J <ou Ofv. ) oco ,f-JDi 'cdi r iOJ >i Pi 13 oi. | roH wf-i j:\P< a> ft! o) P! rc| a.1 f-i <;J o fv.) o f-i ci iJ U TI [>>,i.| M f-i O -rl U i-i Xi M r-> <D +* Pi 0) h h h PH CD <L> -H -H V) M n o o EH O r>n •«! c/1 P-i csi J: P I P-"I P i »• s. •« rh c_i »• v r_i »• i >>« r\. iv-i . r* fl . n~i /*"\ »?••• EC_H J O/-"" i Is:] v- CM R«tirs«)f-oDcnori CM [f-\ ir\ vn r~- CO O^I O r-i CM f-\ •<!• ir\ • • r-l r-l r-l r-| r-l r-l r-| r-l i~l r-1 CM CM CM CM CM CM Of 1 Ialysos 2 Karaeiros 3 Lindos 4 Pigadhia 5 Eleona CHIOS 6 Langadha 7 Perakastro 8 Emporio 9 Thermi 10 Antissa 11 Troy 12 Pitane 13 Elaia 14 Phooaea 15 Larisa 16 Smyrna 17 Clazoraenae 18 Erythrae 19 Sardis 20 Colophon 21 Ephesus K.OS 22 Beycesultan 23 Miletus 24 Iasos 25 Mylasa 26 Miiakebi 27 Cnidus 28 Telemessus RHooes b« to MAP 2 VflSST COAST OF ASIA MINOR Distribution of Mycenaean Pottery a .8 8 S ° 3 i 03 U-l CM i ULI 1 s 5*3 1 r s O.Tr 1 < S.-H3 I CO g §<?> n 1/1 1 12 1 s I s Si •3 3= V I 8 3 IT) j 2 I C/3 at 3 4 { °3 <L4J> 6 VO a, to O CO • f 1. Large Piriform Jar. Myc III A:2 TO (a) 00 (c) 2. (a) Broad-beaked Jug, (b) Tall-necked Piriform Jug, (c) Side-spouted Jar with basket handle. Myc III A:2 1 3. Kylikes. Myc III B 4. Stirrup Jars. Myc III A and III B PTATJ3 1. MYCENAEAN POTTERY FROM IALYSOS, RHODES 1. Necked Kraters with chariot scenes. Myc III A:2 tfmr— J I Small Piriform Jars. Myc III A:2 3. Krater with two horizontal loop handles. Myc III B -3 5. Straight-sided Alabastra or Pyxides !yc III B 4. Stirrup Jar Myc III B PLATE 2. MYCEKAEAN POTTERY FROM CYPRUS X v Alabastron based on sherds from Tell Atchana. Live II A \ 1. Pithoid Jar reconstructed from sherds from Amman. ISyc II A (a) (c 3. (a) Straight-sided Alabastron or Pyxis, (b) liniature Piriform Jug vath * cut-away* nec• k ( c) G-lobular Stirrup Jar. From ^.m Shems Ljyc III A (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 4. (a) Piriform Stirrup Jar, (b) and (c) Pilgrim Flasks, (d) G-lobular Stirrup Jar, (e) Bottle. From Tell el Ajjul. Liyc III A PLATE 3* MYCENA2AN POTTERY FROL' SYRIA AND PALESTINE (b) , . U) Co) (e) mall Piriform Jar, (b) Squat Jar, (c) and (d) Stirrup (e) Straight-sided Alabastron or Pyxis. V (a) Small Jug from Rifeh (b) Small Globular Jug fr o s cim u n L» • Lforc III A (b PIATE 4. MYCENAEAN P0T7BRY FROM EGYPT 0) o > °? H o pq SO o | •rl -P o O 0) O > H 0 EH : -i CO 1 > H . 3 CO H p-1 O o H <M -a O o W C 3 -p fi 0) & o £3 > cd fn [ < (c) ( DJ 2. Ivory Plaque of Warrior from . Delos. Thirteenth Century B.C. (a) (a) Ivory Pyxis Lid of Aegean G-oddess from Minet el Beida (the port of Ras Shamra). (b) and (c) are related carvings from Mycenae. All are Thirteenth Century B.C. 23 (Tt- 3. Cut-out Ivory Plaque showing a lion attacking a griffin. From Delos. Thirteenth Century B.C. PLATS 6. IVORIES CD cd • •P in P CO !H .C EH 01 U -P c a c pq <+-i &J • -4- r • I > EH i D U C/J • 1 i 1 9 / t - '3 > >•/>. -P d : 1 1 v. ? i 1.)V " \ H I r 1 i a 1 / 4 Mm 1. Cooper Ox hido ingot. Type HE 2. Canaanito Jar from a Mycenaean loijb in ih'j ^th:mian .n'ora. 3 La.QL 0. OX HIDli Ii: Ci-u J.—i-j'TZT ;.J ci AR .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Aegean Chapter Viii the Decorative
    H. J. Kantor - Plant Ornament in the Ancient Near East, Chapter VIII: The Decorative Flora of Crete and the Late Helladic Mainland SECTION II: THE AEGEAN CHAPTER VIII THE DECORATIVE FLORA OF CRETE AND THE LATE HELLADIC MAINLAND In the midst of the sea, on the long island of Crete, there dwelt a people, possessors of the fabulous Minoan culture, who are known to have had trade relations with Egypt, and with other Near-Eastern lands. Still farther away towards the north lies the Mainland of Greece, a region that proved itself to be a very hospitable host to the graft of Minoan culture. Before the close of the LH period the ceramic results of this union were to be spread over the Near East in great profusion and it becomes necessary to define the extent of Aegean influence on those traditions of Near-Eastern art that lie within the scope of our topic. Before this is possible a concise summary of the plant ornamentation of the Aegean must be presented.1 This background forms a necessary basis without which the reaction of Aegean plant design on the main development of our story, be it large or small, cannot be determined. 1 A great deal of interest and work has been devoted to the study of Minoan decorative art almost since the beginning of its discovery, and full advantage of this has been taken in the preparation of the present survey. The chief treatments of the subject are as follows: Edith H. Hall, The Decorative Art of Crete in the Bronze Age (Philadelphia, 1907); Ernst Reisinger, Kretische Vasenmalerei vom Kamares bis zum Palast-Stil (Leipzig, Berlin, 1912); Diederich Fimmen, Die Kretisch-Mykenische Kulture (Leipzig, Berlin, 1924), Alois Gotsmich, Entwicklungsgang der Kretischen Ornamentik, Wein, 1923); Frederich Matz, Frühkretische Siegel (Berlin, 1928), covering a much wider field than is indicated by the title; Georg Karo, Die Schachtgräber von Mykenai (Munchen, 1939).
    [Show full text]
  • Hiero Seal Palaikastro 2019.Pdf (1.832Mb)
    OFFPRINT From PALAIKASTRO: BUILDING 1 SUPPLEMENTARY VOLUME 48 THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS 2019 The copyright on this publication belongs to the British School at Athens. As author you are licensed to make printed copies of the pdf or to send the unaltered pdf file to up to 50 contacts. You may not upload this pdf to the World Wide Web — including websites such as academia.edu and open-access repositories — until three years after publication. Please ensure that anyone receiving an offprint from you observes these rules as well PALAIKASTRO BUILDING 1 edited by J. A. MACGILLIVRAY AND L. H. SACKETT with contributions by J. N. BOTTEMA-MAC GILLAVRY, T. F. CUNNINGHAM, C. DOHERTY, J. M. DRIESSEN, D. EVELY, P. JEROME, O. H. KRZYSZKOWSKA, D. MYLONA, D. REESE, J. RUSSELL, A. SARPAKI, S. WALL-CROWTHER, P. WESTLAKE and J. G. YOUNGER SUPPLEMENTARY VOLUME 48 Published by THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS 2019 Published and distributed by The British School at Athens 10 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AH Series Editor: John Bennet Managing Editor: Olga Krzyszkowska © The Council, The British School at Athens ISBN 978-0-904887-70-9 Designed and computer type-set by Rayna Andrew Printed by Short Run Press Ltd, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom Contents List of Figures x List of Tables and Charts xiv List of Plans, Sections and Elevations xv List of Plates xvi General abbreviations, technical terms, symbols, measurements, glossary xix Palaikastro site periods with their approximate Cretan equivalents xx Palaikastro pottery wares and styles outline xxi Acknowledgements xxiii Preface xxv Chapter 1 The excavation by L.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramic Production and Exchange in the Late Mycenaean Saronic Gulf
    Ceramic Production and Exchange in the Late Mycenaean Saronic Gulf William D. Gilstrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology University of Sheffield February 2015 Abstract This thesis examines the production, exchange and consumption of pottery around the Saronic Gulf, Greece, during Late Mycenaean period, specifically Late Helladic IIIB1 to Late Helladic IIIC Phase 1, roughly 1300-1130 BC. While the focus of many studies of Mycenaean political economy has fallen on Messinia and the Argolid, the choice of the Saronic Gulf offers the chance to examine ceramic crafting, movement and use in an area which hosts no accepted ‘palatial’ centres. It aims to examine the role of pottery in everyday social and economic transaction, taking a ‘bottom-up’ approach to shedding light on Mycenaean society and economy. Pottery from a wide range of sites has been studied: urban centres such as Athens; harbours at Kanakia on Salamis and Kalamianos in coastal Corinthia; small settlements of Stiri in Corinthia, Myti Kommeni on Dokos and Lazarides on Aegina; sanctuary sites of Eleusis and Ayios Konstantinos, Methana; and finally the settlement and pottery production site of Kontopigado, Alimos near the Attic coast. Based on typological and macroscopic fabric studies, a large number of samples have been chosen for examination by an integrated programme of petrographic, chemical (by neutron activation analysis) and microstructural analysis (by scanning electron microscopy), in order to group and characterise to pottery according to composition, to reconstruct key aspects of ceramic manufacture and, where possible, to suggest the area or location of their production.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art and Archaeology of Ancient Greece Judith M
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00123-7 - The Art and Archaeology of Ancient Greece Judith M. Barringer Frontmatter More information The Art and This richly illustrated, color textbook introduces the art and Archaeology of archaeology of ancient Greece, from the Bronze Age through the Roman conquest. Suitable for students with no prior knowledge of Ancient Greece ancient art, this book reviews the main objects and monuments of the ancient Greek world, emphasizing the context and function of these artefacts in their particular place and time. Students are led to a rich understanding of how objects were meant to be perceived, what “messages” they transmitted, and how the surrounding environment shaped their meaning. The book includes more than 500 illustrations (with over 400 in color), including specially commissioned photographs, maps, fl oorplans, and reconstructions. Judith Barringer examines a variety of media, including marble and bronze sculpture, public and domestic architecture, painted vases, coins, mosaics, terracotta fi gurines, reliefs, jewelry, armor, and wall paintings. Numerous text boxes, chapter summaries, and timelines, complemented by a detailed glossary, support student learning. • More than 500 illustrations, with over 400 in color, including specially commissioned photographs, maps, plans, and reconstructions • Includes text boxes, chapter summaries and timelines, and detailed glossary • Looks at Greek art from the perspectives of both art history and archaeology, giving students an understanding of the historical and everyday context of art objects Judith M. Barringer is Professor of Greek Art and Archaeology in Classics at the University of Edinburgh. Her areas of specialization are Greek art and archaeology and Greek history, myth, and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Muse1991v25p42-53.Pdf (1.602Mb)
    SOME THOUGHTS ON THE MYCENAEAN POTTERY IN THE COLLECTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, COLUMBIA ELIZABETH FRENCH PENELOPE MOUNTJOY The fa/lawing notes on the Museum of Art and Archaeology's collection of Mycenaean patten; have been compiled by Ors. Elizabeth French and Penelope Mountjoy.The occasion which brought about this project was a seminar given by Professor William Biers of MU's Department of Art History and Archaeology at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens in 1990. 1 he collection comprises only fifteen vases2: seven stirrup jars, one jug, one T lekythos, one feeding bottle, two pilgrim flasks, two alabastra and one pyxis. Yet they illustrate several of the more important issues of present research and form an excellent nucleus for the teaching and understanding of Mycenaean ceramics. First, all are closed vessel forms and both from their types and their unbroken condition almost certainly come from tombs. Tomb vases are thought to have contained scented unguents, both liquid and solid, and food stuffs for the use of the dead on their way to another world. Secondly, though in date they range from LHIIIAI to the end of the Mycenaean period, even with this small number they reflect the ceramic history of the Aegean. It is not surprising that the earliest vases in the collection date to LHIIIA 1; this is the period when a mainland style first spreads in Greece and the islands and when we see the first real expansion into the Eastern Mediterranean. Five vases can be assigned to LHIIIA2/B1, phases which are often hard to disentangle as they form a continuum and in many ways the acme of mainland ceramics and their export.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Exchange and Mobility: the Case of the Grey Ware in Middle and Late Minoan Crete
    PATTERNS OF EXCHANGE AND MOBILITY: THE CASE OF THE GREY WARE IN MIDDLE AND LATE MINOAN CRETE by LUCA GlRELLA * New finds and important contributions have recently offered a fresh overview on wheel-made grey ware on Crete and have also provided an occasion for an update on l pottery imported from outside Crete . As a result the list of Grey Ware (henceforth: GW) in LM III contexts has been expanded, but mentions of such a ware in previous periods have been surprisingly neglected. The aim of this article is to re-examine the evidence of the GW on Crete, from the first appearance of Grey Minyan Ware to the later distribution of GW up to the LM IIIC period (Fig. 1, Table 1)2. As will be understandable from the following overview, most of the information comes from old excavations and publications, when both the identification and terminology of this ware were far from being neatly recognizable (i.e. the use of term bucchero). As a second aim of this contribution, drawing upon GW circulation, we shall inquire into patterns of mobility and exchange; in fact, as a 'foreign ware', the phenomenon of GW on Crete can be the ideal theatre for the exploration of pottery and human mobility. For convenience's sake we shall distinguish four moments with distinct patterns of distribution: (1) the small scale world of the late Prepalatial period, when the unique Minyan bowl from Knossos - a MH I import - confirms the picture of the asymmetrical relationship between the Greek Mainland and Crete, which saw a large quantity of Minoan and Minoanizing pottery at coastal sites of southern and northeastern Peloponnese, but not the contrary.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Organic Residues As Cultural and Environmental Proxies: the Value of Legacy Objects
    sustainability Article Ancient Organic Residues as Cultural and Environmental Proxies: The Value of Legacy Objects Andrew J. Koh 1,* and Kathleen J. Birney 2 1 Center for Materials Research in Archaeology and Ethnology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA 2 Department of Classical Studies and Archaeology Program, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459-3207, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 27 January 2019 Abstract: Often treated as an accessory science, organic residue analysis (ORA) has the capacity to illuminate otherwise hidden aspects of ancient technology, culture, and economy, and therein can play a central role in archaeological inquiry. Through ORA, both the intact vessel freshly excavated from a tomb and the sherd tucked away in a museum storage closet can offer insights into their contents, their histories, and the cultures that created them—provided the results can be carefully calibrated to account for their treatment during and after excavation. The case study below presents ORA data obtained from a range of artifacts from Late Bronze Age Crete, setting results from freshly-excavated and legacy objects alongside one another. Although legacy objects do tend to yield diminished results from both a quantitative and qualitative perspective, our comparative work has demonstrated both their value and untapped potential when their object biographies are carefully considered. It also sheds light on biomarker degradation processes, which have implications for methodologies of extraction and interpretation of legacy objects. Comparative studies such as these broaden the pool of viable ORA candidates, and therein amplify ORA’s ability to reveal patterns of consumption as well as ecological and environmental change.
    [Show full text]
  • Troy Myth and Reality
    Part 1 Large print exhibition text Troy myth and reality Please do not remove from the exhibition This two-part guide provides all the exhibition text in large print. There are further resources available for blind and partially sighted people: Audio described tours for blind and partially sighted visitors, led by the exhibition curator and a trained audio describer will explore highlight objects from the exhibition. Tours are accompanied by a handling session. Booking is essential (£7.50 members and access companions go free) please contact: Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7323 8971 Thursday 12 December 2019 14.00–17.00 and Saturday 11 January 2020 14.00–17.00 1 There is also an object handling desk at the exhibition entrance that is open daily from 11.00 to 16.00. For any queries about access at the British Museum please email [email protected] 2 Sponsor’sThe Trojan statement War For more than a century BP has been providing energy to advance human progress. Today we are delighted to help you learn more about the city of Troy through extraordinary artefacts and works of art, inspired by the stories of the Trojan War. Explore the myth, archaeology and legacy of this legendary city. BP believes that access to arts and culture helps to build a more inspired and creative society. That’s why, through 23 years of partnership with the British Museum, we’ve helped nearly five million people gain a deeper understanding of world cultures with BP exhibitions, displays and performances. Our support for the arts forms part of our wider contribution to UK society and we hope you enjoy this exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • VESSELS of the GODS Treasures of the Ancient Greeks
    The International Museum Institute of New York presents VESSELS OF THE GODS Treasures of the Ancient Greeks 1650 – 410 B.C. Reflecting the brilliance of a millennium of ancient Aegean culture, four distinct periods produced the designs of these vases: Minoan, Mycenaean, Corinthian and Attic. Essentially consisting of silhouetted figures drawn against a background of red, black, or white, this art form gradually dies out after the Persian wars, c. 475-450 B.C. Shaped and painted by hand, these exquisite reproductions were created in Greece by master artists from the originals housed in The National Museum, Athens, The Heraklion Museum, The Thera Museum, The Corinth Museum, The Delphi Museum, The Louvre Museum, The Vatican Museum, and The Museo Civico, Brescia. MINOAN 1. Phaestos Disc c. 1650 B.C. The early writing of the tribal islanders of Crete and Santorini, the mysterious forerunners of the Greeks known as the Minoans, marks their emergence from the Stone Age at the beginning of the second millennium B.C. This enigmatic clay tablet, found in Crete and engraved in the elusive Linear A script, remains undeciphered. 2. Mistress of the Snakes c. 1600 B.C. Crowned with opium poppy pods surmounted by a crouching lion cub associating the figure with a royal house, this faience votive offering was found in a storage chamber of the Palace of Knossos on the island of Crete. The statuette either represents a deity or an agricultural fertility cult priestess, traditionally garbed as the Cretan Earth Mother goddess she served, carrying a pair of serpents as symbols of seasonal death and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • L-G-0003001189-0005708073.Pdf
    A HISTORY OF GREEK ART A HISTORY OF GREEK ART MARK D. STANSBURY-O’DONNELL This edition first published 2015 © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Registered Office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial Offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148–5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services, and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. The right of Mark D. Stansbury-O’Donnell to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neopalatial Period
    The Neopalatial Period Social Organization and the Palaces Some important Neopalatial sites Distinctive Minoan “palatial” architectural features • Light wells • Pier-and-door partitions • “Minoan hall” suite of rooms • Lustral basins • Pillar crypts • Columns that taper down • Porticoes with columns and pillars Light wells Pier-and-door partitions Generic plan of a Minoan Hall (after Evans) Lustral basins Pillar crypts Columns that taper down Aerial views of the four main palaces: Knossos (top left) Mallia (top right) Zakro (bottom left) Phaistos (bottom right) Plans of the four main palaces: Knossos (top left) Mallia (top right) Zakro (bottom left) Phaistos (bottom right) The central courts of the palaces Central court at Phaistos, looking N toward Mt. Ida View from central court at Knossos, looking S toward Jouktas Central court at Knossos, looking N along western rooms West Courts The west court at Knossos The NW corner of the west court at Phaistos Storage Magazines “Residential Quarters” Light well in the residential quarter at Knossos Evans’ reconstruction drawing of the “bathroom” The “Queen’s Megaron” at Knossos Plan of the “piano nobile” at Knossos Reconstruction of façade with tripartite shrine Cult rooms to west of central court The Throne Room Theatral Areas Knossos Phaistos Nirou Chani East Court with stepped base for “horns of consecration” Detail of Wall Construction and Main entrance into the “Minoan Hall” Gypsum Veneering (Rooms 6A and 6, from SW Gournia Ayia Triadha Neopalatial Pottery: marine style and floral style Stirrup jar from Palaikastro Flask from Palaikastro Jug from Phaistos Rhyton Neopalatial metallurgy Fresco paintings Stone vessels (Rhyta) Seal rings and sealings Faience plaques from the town mosaic from Knossos “Snake goddess figurine.
    [Show full text]
  • RARELY EXHIBITED GREEK POTTERY Part I: Bronze Age-Orientalizing (2700–530 BCE)
    RARELY EXHIBITED GREEK POTTERY Part I: Bronze Age-Orientalizing (2700–530 BCE) Text by: Benton Kidd, Curator of Ancient Art Stephen Czujko, Doctoral Student Department of Ancient Mediterranean Studies Minoan and Mycenaean Pottery Wheel-made pottery was long established by the Bronze Age (ca. 3000–1100 BCE), and utilitarian vessels, decorated or not, were essential to the cultures of the ancient Mediterranean. Like later Greek culture, Minoans and Mycenaeans were prolific potters. The earlier Minoan culture was centered on the island of Crete, while Mycenaean Greeks lived on the mainland. Minoans and Mycenaeans were two distinct cultures, with different languages, belief systems, and artistic tendencies. Minoan art, including pottery, has long been described as freeform and naturalistic, often depicting the natural world such as aquatic life. By contrast, Mycenaean art is often characterized as less naturalistic and more standardized in its decoration. Minoans of the Middle Bronze Age had a profound influence on the Mycenaeans of the Late Bronze Age. The consensus today seems to be that seafaring brought Minoans into contact with Mycenaeans around the fifteenth century BCE. We know this because elite Mycenaean tombs from that time suddenly contain Minoan and Minoan-influenced goods. Some suggest Mycenaean elite were collectors of Minoan “antiques.” Pyxis Gray Ware, Early Minoan II, 2700–2150 BCE From Lendas, Crete (Greece) Pottery Museum purchase (60.21) The pyxis is a round, lidded container, with numerous examples known down through the Hellenistic period (300–30 BCE). Pyxides may have been used to hold cosmetics or jewelry, and some could be suspended, though the reason for suspension is unclear.
    [Show full text]