DOCSLIB.ORG

Industry-Wide Acronyms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Industry-Wide Acronyms INDUSTRY-WIDE ACRONYMS ACC Arizona Corporation Commission ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality AEPCO Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. ANZA Anza Electric Cooperative, Inc. APA Arizona Power Authority APPA American Public Power Association APS Arizona Public Service Company ASLD Arizona State Land Department AVIDD Avra Valley Irrigation Drainage District ADWR Arizona Department of Water Resources AzISA Arizona Independent Scheduling Administrators Association BLM Bureau of Land Management CAISO California Independent System Operator CAP Central Arizona Project CAWCD Central Arizona Water Conservation District CCPG Colorado Coordinated Planning Group CEC California Energy Commission CPUC California Public Utility Commission CREDA Colorado River Energy Distributor’s Association CREPC Committee on Regional Electric Power Cooperation CRSP Colorado River Storage Project CSPG California Sub-regional Planning Group CWP Construction Work Plan DOE U.S. Department of Energy DHS Department of Homeland Security DNR Department of Natural Resources DVEC Duncan Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. ED1 Electric District #1 ED2 Electric District #2 ED3 Electric District #3 ED4 Electric District #4 ED5 Electric District #5 EEI Edison Electric Institute EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA Environmental Protection Agency EPE El Paso Electric Company EPG Environmental Planning Group EPRI Electric Power Research Institute ER Environmental Report FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact Statement GCEC Graham County Electric Cooperative, Inc. GCSECA Grand Canyon State Electric Cooperative Association, Inc. 6/4/2008 SWTC & TEP 2nd Quarter 1 Stakeholder Meeting GIS Geographic Information System GPS Global Positioning System GRICUA Gila River Indian Community Utility Authority IEDA Irrigation and Electrical Districts Association IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. IID Imperial Irrigation District IOU Investor-owned Utility IPP Independent Power Producer IRP Integrated Resource Plan ISO Independent System Operator KRSA K. R. Saline & Associates kV Kilovolts kW Kilowatts kWH Kilowatt-hour LADWP Los Angeles Department of Water & Power MEC Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. MUNI Municipal-owned System MW Megawatts MWD Metropolitan Water District MW&E Morenci Water & Electric MWH Megawatt-hour NARUC National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners NEC Navopache Electric Cooperative, Inc. NERC North American Reliability Corporation NMPRC New Mexico Public Regulation Commission NM RETA New Mexico Renewable Energy Transmission Authority NPC Nevada Power Company NRECA National Rural Electric Cooperative Association NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory NTAC Northwest Transmission Assessment Committee NTTG Northern Tier Transmission Group NTUA Navajo Tribal Utility Authority NWPP Northwest Power Pool OASIS Open Access Same-Time Information System OATI Open Access Technology International OATT Open Access Transmission Tariff OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PG&E Pacific Gas & Electric PCC Planning Coordination Committee (of WECC) PD Parker Davis System (either the dams or transmission system) PMA Power Marketing Agency PNM Public Service Company of New Mexico PRPA Platte River Power Authority PUC Public Utility Commission PSCO Public Service Company of Colorado RDRC Rocky Mountain Desert Southwest Reliability Center 6/4/2008 SWTC & TEP 2nd Quarter 2 Stakeholder Meeting REC Rural Electric Cooperative RETI Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (California) RMEL Rocky Mountain Electric League RTO Regional Transmission Association RUS Rural Utilities Service SCE Southern California Edison SCIP San Carlos Irrigation Project SDG&E San Diego Gas & Electric Company SIDD Silverbell Irrigation Drainage District SMUD Sacramento Municipal Utility District SPG Sub-regional Planning Group SPPG Sierra Pacific Planning Group SPPR Southwest Public Power Resources Group SPR Sierra Pacific Resources SRP Salt River Project SRSG Southwest Reserve Sharing Group SSVEC Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. STPG Sub-regional Transmission Planning Group SWAT Southwest Area Transmission Planning Group SWTC Southwest Transmission Cooperative, Inc. SWPG Southwestern Power Group II, LLC TANC Transmission Agency of Northern California TEP Tucson Electric Power Company TEPPC Transmission Expansion Planning Policy Committee (of WECC) TP Transmission Provider TRICO Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. TSGT Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association UES Unisource Energy Services USBR United States Bureau of Reclamation WECC Western Electricity Coordinating Council WESTERN Western Area Power Administration WIEB Western Interstate Energy Board WC WestConnect WGA Western Governor’s Association WSES Western States Energy Solutions SWAT SUB-GROUP ACRONYMS AZNM Arizona-New Mexico Regional Transmission CATS-EHV Central Arizona Transmission Study – Extra High Voltage CATS-HV Central Arizona Transmission Study – High Voltage CRT Colorado River Transmission NM New Mexico Transmission Renewable Transmission Task Force (no acronym yet) SATS Southeast Arizona Transmission Study SCWG Short-circuit Working Group 6/4/2008 SWTC & TEP 2nd Quarter 3 Stakeholder Meeting .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNS Holdco Cash Sources & Uses
    An Historic Look at UNS Energy Tucson Electric Power & Unisource Electric Kevin Battaglia Resource Planning 1 First Power Plant downtown at 120 N. Church St. W. Congress at Church (1916) 1904 Power Plant moves to 220 W. Sixth Street 220 W. Sixth Street Generators 5 Changes in the 60’s 6 Until 1942 TEP was an electrical island, disconnected from other utilities NEVADA Davis Dam PHOENIX Tucson 1950 Demoss Petrie 100 MW 8 1950 DeMoss Petrie 100 MW Irvington Generating Station - 1958 • Eventually, there would be four gas units producing 422 MW. Later named H. Wilson Sundt Generating Station • Tucson’s population in 1958 was 230,000 • Conversion of Unit 4 to Gas was mandated by Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 (PPIFUA) 1964 Interconnection to Arizona Public Service at Saguaro PHOENIX Tucson’s population wasSaguaro (APS)309,000 TUCSON Being connected to other utilities allows sales of excess power and it provides outside support in emergencies. 1969 Four Corners Units 4 & 5 – 110MW Tucson’s population was 345,000 Participation: Southern California Edison: 48 % Arizona Public Service: 15 % Public Service Co. of New Mexico: 13 % Salt River Project: 10 % Tucson Electric Power: 7 % 1972 Palo Verde – 521 MW By 1975, management saw that slower than expected load growth and higher than forecast costs did not merit the risk of such a large project. In 1975 TEP’s interest in Palo Verde was sold. Arizona Coal Resources 14 Transmission Resources San Juan McKinley PHOENIX Greenlee Saguaro Tortolita Tucson Irvington South Vail November 2013 15 Future Expansion Requires More EHV Transmission Tucson’s population was 416,000 The 345 KV San Juan to Vail line is completed in 1973 at a cost of $89 million or about $250 million in today’s dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region's
    FINAL Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region’s Facilities Historic Context Statement Edited by Lisa M. Meyer September 2014 FINAL Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region’s Facilities Historic Context Edited by Lisa M. Meyer September 2014 DSW Region’s Facilities Historic Context Statement CONTENTS Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................. 1-1 Data Sources Consulted ......................................................................................................... 1-5 Current Document ................................................................................................................. 1-8 2. Statement of Context Part 1: DSW Region’s Transmission Power Systems………………………………………… ...................................................................................... 2-1 Temporal Context .................................................................................................................. 2-1 Geographic Context ............................................................................................................... 2-1 Historic Context ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Affected Environment
    Chapter Three Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 describes environmental resources (e.g., hydrologic, biologic, and socioeconomic) of the Colorado River Basin that could be affected by the proposed federal action and the range of alternatives for implementing the proposed federal action described in Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, respectively. The extent to which each specific resource may be impacted is discussed in Chapter 4. Section 3.2 presents a general discussion of the geographic scope within which potential effects of the alternatives are analyzed, and describes each of the potentially affected Colorado River reaches and water service areas. Subsequent sections in this chapter describe specific resources that may be potentially affected, such as water deliveries, recreation and biologic resources. Each resource section contains a discussion of one or more specific issues identified for consideration through scoping, public review and comment, and internal review (Chapter 1, Table 1.5-1). Final EIS – Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for 3-1 October 2007 Lake Powell and Lake Mead Affected Environment Chapter 3 This page intentionally left blank. Final EIS – Colorado River Interim Guidelines for October 2007 3-2 Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.2 Geographic Scope The proposed federal action considers modified operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead over a wide range of reservoir elevations as addressed by the four operational elements discussed in Section 1.2, i.e., shortage conditions, coordinated operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead, storage and delivery of Colorado River system and non-system water, and the modified ISG.
    [Show full text]
  • Tucson Electric Power Company Open Access
    TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY OPEN ACCESS TRANSMISSION TARIFF TABLE OF CONTENTS I. COMMON SERVICE PROVISIONS 1 DEFINITIONS 1.0 AFFILIATE 1.1 ANCILLARY SERVICES 1.2 ANNUAL TRANSMISSION COSTS 1.3 APPLICATION 1.3A ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION COMPETITION RULES 1.3B ARIZONA INDEPENDENT SCHEDULING ADMINISTRATOR ASSOCIATION (AISA) 1.4 COMMISSION 1.5 COMPLETED APPLICATION 1.6 CONTROL AREA 1.7 CURTAILMENT 1.8 DELIVERING PARTY 1.9 DESIGNATED AGENT 1.10 DIRECT ASSIGNMENT FACILITIES 1.11 ELIGIBLE CUSTOMER 1.12 FACILITIES STUDY 1.13 FIRM POINT-TO-POINT TRANSMISSION SERVICE 1.14 GOOD UTILITY PRACTICE 1.15 INTERRUPTION 1.16 LOAD RATIO SHARE 1.17 LOAD SHEDDING 1.18 LONG-TERM FIRM POINT-TO-POINT TRANSMISSION SERVICE 1.19 [RESERVED] 1.20 NETWORK CUSTOMER 1.21 NETWORK INTEGRATION TRANSMISSION SERVICE 1.22 NETWORK LOAD 1.23 NETWORK OPERATING AGREEMENT 1.24 NETWORK OPERATING COMMITTEE 1.25 NETWORK RESOURCE 1.26 NETWORK UPGRADES 1.27 NON-FIRM POINT-TO-POINT TRANSMISSION SERVICE 1.27A NON-FIRM SALE 1.28 OPEN ACCESS SAME-TIME INFORMATION SYSTEM (OASIS) 1.29 PART I 1.30 PART II 1.31 PART III 1.31A PART IV 1.32 PARTIES 1.33 POINT(S) OF DELIVERY 1.34 POINT(S) OF RECEIPT 1.35 POINT-TO-POINT TRANSMISSION SERVICE 1.36 POWER PURCHASER 1.36A PRE-CONFIRMED APPLICATION 1.37 RECEIVING PARTY 1.38 REGIONAL TRANSMISSION GROUP (RTG) 1.39 RESERVED CAPACITY 1.39A RETAIL COMPETITION PROTOCOLS 1. 39B RETAIL DIRECT ACCESS NETWORK INTEGRATION TRANSMISSION SERVICE 1. 39C RETAIL DIRECT ACCESS NETWORK OPERATING AGREEMENT 1. 39D SCHEDULING COORDINATOR 1.40 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1.41
    [Show full text]
  • 00 0 0 1 048 0 3 Before the Arizona C.Corporation
    a..*. 'S f a A a 5 A 00 0 0 1 048 0 3 1 BEFORE THE ARIZONA C.CORPORATION LU1vlMl5slUn -<7 2 COMMISSIONERS #58 ll- 3 KRISTIN K. MAYES - Chairman I v`2 I l..=- e "O :MD- GARY PIERCE 4 PAUL NEWMAN SANDRA D. KENNEDY 5 BOB STUMP 6 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF DOCKET no. E-04204A-09-0206 7 UNS ELECTRIC, INC. FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUST AND REASONABLE RATES AND 8 CHARGES DESIGNED TO REALIZE A STAFF'S NOTICE OF FILING REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN ON THE FAIR 9 VALUE OF THE PROPERTIES OF UNS ELECTRIC, DIRECT TESTIMONY INC. DEVOTED TO ITS OPERATIONS 10 THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ARIZONA Staff of the Arizona Corporation Commission ("Staff") hereby files the Direct Testimony of 12 Dr. Thomas H. Fish; David C. Parcell; W. Michael Lewis; and Kenneth C. Rozen of the Utilities 13 Division. An Unredacted version of both Dr. Thomas H. Fish's and Kenneth C. Rozen's Direct 14 Testimony has also been provided under seal to the Commissioners, their Assistants, the assigned 15 Administrative Law Judge and the parties that have signed the Protective Agreement in this case. 16 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of November 2009. 17 r 18 ( ( .l Senior séé Counsel 19 Maureen A. Scott Senior séé Wesley Van Clem/e, Attorney 20 Legal Division Arizona Corporation Commission 21 1200 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 22 (602) 542-3402 23 Arizona Comaméon Gsmmlssum Arizona Comaméon 24 Original and thirteen (la) copies _ to ,(4t*"""3° of the foregoing filed this Q 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Empower ARIZONA
    emPOWER ARIZONA: TABLE OF CONTENTS Governor’s Letter Executive Summary 1. Energy Overview, Consumption and 10-Year Outlook ................................................. 1 a. Overview ................................................................................................................. 1 b. Consumption .......................................................................................................... 4 c. Arizona's Regulatory Framework .......................................................................... 12 2. Arizona Energy Resources .......................................................................................... 19 a. Coal ....................................................................................................................... 19 b. Natural Gas ........................................................................................................... 23 c. Nuclear .................................................................................................................. 25 d. Hydroelectric ........................................................................................................ 28 e. Solar ...................................................................................................................... 29 f. Wind ...................................................................................................................... 34 g. Biomass ................................................................................................................. 36
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Upstream: an Analysis of Low Water Levels in Lake Powell And
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2016 Looking Upstream: An Analysis of Low Water Levels in Lake Powell and the Impacts on Water Supply, Hydropower, Recreation, and the Environment: A Companion Report to The Bathtub Ring Michael Johnson Lindsey Ratcliff Rebecca Shively Leanne Weiss Yale University. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Environmental Policy Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Public Policy Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Michael Johnson, Lindsey Ratcliff, Rebecca Shively, Leanne Weiss & Western Water Policy Program, Looking Upstream: An Analysis of Low Water Levels in Lake Powell and the Impacts on Water Supply, Hydropower, Recreation, and the Environment: A Companion Report to The Bathtub Ring (Getches- Wilkinson Ctr. for Nat. Res., Energy, & the Env't, Univ. of Colo. Law Sch. 2016). Authors Michael Johnson; Lindsey Ratcliff; Rebecca Shively; Leanne Weiss; Yale University. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies; University of Colorado Boulder. Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment; and Western Water Policy Program This book is available at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies/ 169 MICHAEL JOHNSON, LINDSEY RATCLIFF, REBECCA SHIVELY, LEANNE WEISS & WESTERN WATER POLICY PROGRAM, LOOKING UPSTREAM: ANALYSIS OF LOW WATER LEVELS IN LAKE POWELL AND THE IMPACTS ON WATER SUPPLY, HYDROPOWER, RECREATION, AND THE ENVIRONMENT: A COMPANION REPORT TO THE BATHTUB RING (Getches-Wilkinson Ctr.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Cover
    ARIZONA’S ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE September 2002 Prepared for the Arizona Department of Commerce by Rebecca Holmes, Senior Economist, Salt River Project and Craig A. Marks, Director, Energy Office, Arizona Department of Commerce in collaboration with Jerry Conover, Ph.D. Director, Bureau of Business & Economic Research Northern Arizona University ARIZONA’S ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE September 2002 Prepared by: In collaboration with: Rebecca Holmes Craig A. Marks Jerry Conover, Ph.D. Senior Senior Economist Director, Energy Office Director, Bureau of Business Salt River Project Arizona Department of Commerce and Economic Research Northern Arizona University Peer reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee for Arizona Statewide Economic Study 2002: Dan Anderson Brian Cary Assistant Executive Director for Institutional Analysis Forecast Consultant Arizona Board of Regents Pinnacle West Energy Corporation James B. Nelson William P. Patton, Ph.D. Economic Development Manager Director of Economic Development Salt River Project Tucson Electric Power Tom Rex, Carol Sanger Research Manager Assistant Deputy Director for Planning, Research and Policy Center for Business Research, L. William Seidman Arizona Department of Commerce Research Institute, College of Business, Arizona State University Mary Lynn Tischer, Ph.D. Marshall Vest Director, Transportation Planning Division Director, Economic and Business Research Arizona Department of Transportation Eller College of Business and Public Administration University of Arizona Technical review by: Gary A. Smith Jerry Smith Vice President and General Manager Electric Engineer Citizens Communications, Arizona Gas Division Utilities Division, Arizona Corporation Commission William P. Patton, Ph.D. Brian Cary Director of Economic Development Forecast Consultant Tucson Electric Power Pinnacle West Energy Corporation Kathy Senseman Government Affairs Specialist Southwest Gas ã ?2002 by the Arizona Department of Commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • A CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY and HISTORIC BUILDING ASSESSMENT for TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER’S IRVINGTON CAMPUS, TUCSON, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA Tucson Electric Power
    A CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND HISTORIC BUILDING ASSESSMENT FOR TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER’S IRVINGTON CAMPUS, TUCSON, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA Tucson Electric Power Prepared by: Anna M. King and Avi Buckles Reviewed and submitted by: Fred Huntington Cultural Resources Report 2017-46 ASM Accession No. 2017-202 June 8, 2017 Project Number: 1610.204 WestLand Resources, Inc. 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 5202069585 Cultural Resources Inventory/Historic Building Assessment TEP’s Irvington Campus, Tucson, AZ – i STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY Disclosure of the locations of historic properties to the public may be in violation of both federal and state laws. Applicable United States laws include, but may not be limited to, Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470w-3) and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (16 U.S.C. §470hh). In Arizona, applicable state laws include, but may not be limited to, Arizona Revised Statute Title 39, Section 125. Q:\Jobs\1600's\1610.204\ARC\CRI\Initial Submittal_06-08-17\CRI TEP Irvington Campus_06-08-17.docx WestLand Resources, Inc. Cultural Resources Inventory/Historic Building Assessment TEP’s Irvington Campus, Tucson, AZ – ii TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY ........................................................................................... i STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REPORT ABSTRACT ................................... iv INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND................................................................... 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Tucson Electric Power Company Collection
    TITLE: Tucson Electric Power Company collection DATE RANGE: 1925-1976 CALL NUMBER: MS 0975 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 32 linear ft. (187 volumes) PROVENANCE: Donated by Tucson Electric Power Company in February 1981. COPYRIGHT: The Arizona Historical Society owns the copyright to this collection. RESTRICTIONS: This collection is unrestricted. CREDIT LINE: Tucson Electric Power Company collection, MS 0975, Arizona Historical Society-Tucson PROCESSED BY: Processed in 1984. Finding aid transcribed by Nancy Siner, November 2015 HISTORICAL NOTE: Tucson Electric Power Company, known until 1979 as Tucson Gas and Electric Company, is a major utility serving southern Arizona. The present company has had several predecessors. Tucson Gas Company, founded in March 1880 was granted a twenty-five year franchise with the City of Tucson, Arizona to supply gas street lighting. A competitor, Tucson Electric Light Company, was organized in March 1882 and thus began an intense rivalry for the city’s street lighting contract. The Tucson city council terminated its agreement with the gas company in August 1883 and awarded the street lighting contract to Tucson Electric Light Company. Lawsuits and financial difficulties plagued the electric company in the following years and it was sold to its creditors on May 22, 1885. Street lights went out in Tucson in the summer of 1885 and service was not resumed on a regular basis until October 1888. The company and the city negotiated annual contracts for street lighting until 1893. The Tucson Electric Light and Power Company was reincorporated on October 28, 1892. Its officers included several prominent Tucsonans: Albert Steinfeld, president; A.V. Grossetta, vice-president; L.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy + Environmental Economics (E3) and ILLUME Advising, LLC on Behalf of Arizona Public Service and Tucson Electric Power
    ARIZONA STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION PLAN, PHASE II: WORKSHOP 1 REPORT Energy + Environmental Economics (E3) and ILLUME Advising, LLC On behalf of Arizona Public Service and Tucson Electric Power August 26, 2020 This report provides a report of Workshop 1, including key points of stakeholder engagement during Workshop 1 and follow-up activities to support future stakeholder engagement immediately following Workshop 1. WORKSHOP 1 SUMMARY Facilitated by Energy + Environmental Economics (E3) and ILLUME Advising, LLC (the E3 Team) on behalf of Arizona Public Service (APS) and Tucson Electric Power (TEP), Workshop 1 brought together about 160 participants from across Arizona to discuss the development of a Statewide Transportation Electrification (TE) Plan through a virtual, online meeting space. Ben Shapiro, Consultant and Project Manager for E3, presented an overview of the Phase II Plan including the project scope, the specific methods and analyses that will inform the Phase II Plan, and an explanation of how the project will merge analytical results and stakeholder inputs to identify key TE barriers and related enabling actions. A copy of the E3 presentation slides can be found through the project microsite here, and a summary of E3’s approach is included below. Kimberly Jaeger Johnson, ILLUME Managing Consultant introduced the working group process before directing stakeholders to break out into individual Working Groups (facilitated by ILLUME and E3, with utility representatives present) to discuss expectations, define leadership roles, review activities, inputs, and crowdsourcing approaches, and provide space for stakeholders to discuss the scope of each working group, and redefine as necessary. Five concurrent working group breakout sessions were held, one for each of the working groups: EV Infrastructure, Equity, Programs and Partnerships, Goods Movement and Transit, and Vehicle Grid Integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 APPENDIX K: 14 15 HYDROPOWER SYSTEMS TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS 16 K-1 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 This page intentionally left blank 14 15 K-2 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 APPENDIX K: 2 3 HYDROPOWER SYSTEMS TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS 4 5 6 This appendix provides details on three analyses that are related to hydropower system 7 electricity production, powerplant capacity, costs, and electricity service charge rates and that are 8 conducted for the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experiment and Management Plan (LTEMP) 9 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The first analysis (presented in Section K.1) 10 evaluated the impacts of changes in Glen Canyon Dam operations associated with LTEMP 11 alternatives on the economic value of the powerplant’s capacity and energy production. The 12 impacts were measured in terms of changes in the value of regional power system capacity (the 13 power system comprised of Western’s long-term firm (LTF) customers) and overall system-level 14 electricity production costs (the entire Western Interconnection). The second analysis (presented 15 in Section K.2) studied how system resources and operations under LTEMP alternatives affect 16 the wholesale electricity rates paid by utility entities that receive federal preference power 17 produced by Glen Canyon Dam.
    [Show full text]