DOCSLIB.ORG

Campaigns and Communications Assistant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Campaigns and Communications Assistant Campaigns and Communications Assistant Job description and person specification Cruelty Free International is the leading organisation working to create a world where nobody wants or believes we need to experiment on animals. Our dedicated team are experts in their fields, combining award-winning campaigning, political lobbying, pioneering undercover investigations, scientific and legal expertise and corporate responsibility. Educating, challenging and inspiring others across the globe to respect and protect animals, we investigate and expose the reality of life for animals in laboratories, challenge decision-makers to make a positive difference for animals, and champion better science and cruelty free living. We are widely respected as an authority on animal testing issues and are frequently called on by governments, the media, corporations and official bodies for advice or expert opinion. We work professionally, building relationships with politicians, business leaders and officials, analysing legislation and challenging decision-making panels around the globe to act as the voice for animals in laboratories. With a history spanning over 100 years, Cruelty Free International has achieved so much for animals. Bringing the issue to public attention with our dynamic and determined approach, we have inspired generations of politicians, decision-makers and compassionate people to make a difference for animals used in experiments. As the problem has grown, we have stepped up to meet the challenge across the world, placing the issue on the global agenda for the first time. We have saved many thousands of animals from a life of suffering in laboratories, and together we can do so much more. Established in 1898, Cruelty Free International is firmly rooted in the early social justice movement. Our founder, Frances Power Cobbe, was a formidable women’s rights campaigner and philanthropist. Previously known as the ‘British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection’ or ‘BUAV’, today Cruelty Free International is the leading organisation working globally to consign animal experiments to the history books. Proposed vacancy details Job Title: Campaigns and Communications Assistant Role: This is a full time and permanent position Location: Highbury Corner, London N7 Reporting to: Director of Campaigns and Communications Salary: £19,500 per annum Benefits 12 month interest free season ticket loan 24 working days’ paid holiday, in addition to Public Holidays’ Employer’s Ethical Investor’s Stakeholder Pension Scheme Generous training and professional development allowance Flexible working hours Childcare Voucher Scheme Ride-to-Work Bicycle Scheme Terms and conditions 6 month probationary period Summary of post Ending animal experiments worldwide will always be the most challenging of tasks. This post reflects our commitment to build on and develop our campaign and communications activities to achieve our vision to create a world in which nobody wants or believes we need to experiment on animals. Working as a key member of the Campaign and Communications team, you will develop and co-ordinate campaigning activities across the organisation and deliver projects with corporate partners and stakeholders to create positive change for animals. You will assist with the delivery of communications outputs to ensure our audiences hear our high impact message. With a keen eye for detail and the ability to work collaboratively and to pressing deadlines; you will utilise excellent organisational and research skills, as well as your flair for creativity in order to deliver on-message supporter-focused campaigns, projects and presence at sectoral events. You will use your excellent digital communications, copywriting and IT skills to assist in the delivery of communications output to key audiences to compliment the organisation’s vision, mission and values. The post holder will be required to undertake occasional domestic and international travel and out-of hours working as necessary. Job description 1. Support the Director of Campaigns and Communications and Campaigns Officer in the coordination, delivery and monitoring of a range of campaigns and projects, taking responsibility for the project management of key outputs, as required. 2. Undertake research and analysis to underpin campaigns, communications and project activity; and develop and maintain suitable administrative systems on behalf of the Campaigns and Communications Team. 3. Assist the Communications Officer with the day-to-day operation of the organisation’s traditional and digital communications, including websites, email marketing, social media and print. 4. Assist with copy writing for a range of digital and traditional communications, in line with agreed messaging and tone of voice guidelines and in accordance with sign-off procedures, to promote our work to a broad range of target audiences. 5. Assist the Campaigns Officer in coordinating the organisation’s attendance at supporter-focused events. 6. Develop and maintain high professional standards, and work with colleagues drawn from across the organisation to assist in the delivery of project work, as required. 7. At the request of the Director of Campaigns and Communications undertake any other duties consistent with the post and assist with other areas of work as required. Person specification Essential Criteria Expertise, competence and skills 1. Strong and proven organisational skills with the ability to prioritise workloads and manage multiple tasks in order to meet deadlines 2. Demonstrable creative thought and the aptitude to proactively problem solve 3. A keen eye for detail with the ability to research and analyse information and summarise key points for quick digestion 4. Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to communicate with international and corporate partners as well as internal stakeholders 5. Excellent written, verbal and presentation skills with the ability to simplify complex and detailed information for a wide audience 6. Solid understanding of digital communications platforms, including website content management systems and social media 7. The ability to take instructions, and work well within a team and with colleagues in different disciplines across the organisation Qualifications (IT, academic, vocational) 8. Educated to degree standard or equivalent Experience 9. Excellent IT skills including experience using Word, PowerPoint, Excel, Internet Explorer, email and social media (Desirable) 10. At least one years’ proven experience of working within a campaigns, communications, events or project-focussed environment (Desirable) 11. Experience of using a website content management system and/or administration of organisational social media accounts (Desirable) 12. Experience of using Photoshop, InDesign or video editing software (Desirable) 13. Experience of working with internationally-based partners or colleagues Specific qualities (e.g. attitudes) 14. Commitment to animal welfare and the vision and mission of Cruelty Free International 15. A positive and flexible approach to the work and willingness to travel internationally and work at weekends upon occasion 16. Knowledge of the issues affecting Cruelty Free International as a small, not-for-profit organisation working to create a world where nobody wants or believes we need to experiment on animals .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aproximações Preliminares Ao Debate Entre Frances Power
    História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos ISSN: 0104-5970 [email protected] Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasil de Lima Carvalho, André Luis; Waizbort, Ricardo A dor além dos confins do homem: aproximações preliminares ao debate entre Frances Power Cobbe e os darwinistas a respeito da vivissecção na Inglaterra vitoriana (1863- 1904) História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos, vol. 17, núm. 3, 2010, pp. 577-605 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=386138050002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Pain beyond the confines of man Pain beyond the confines of man: a preliminary CARVALHO, André Luis de Lima; WAIZBORT, Ricardo. Pain beyond the introduction to the confines of man: a preliminary introduction to the debate between debate between Frances Frances Power Cobbe and the Darwinists with respect to vivisection Power Cobbe and the in Victorian England (1863-1904). História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Darwinists with respect to Rio de Janeiro, v.17, n.3, July-Sept. 2010. Available at: http:// vivisection in Victorian www.scielo.br. England Abstract (1863-1904) This article introduces a person who is little known and studied in the Brazilian and South-American academic communities. Frances Power Cobbe was a British woman in the Victorial period engaged in various social causes, among them the abolition of vivisection. In her later years, Cobbe criticized any use of live animals in laboratory experiments, with or without the use of anesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Experimentation in India
    Animal Defenders International ● National Anti-Vivisection Society Animal Experimentation in India Unfettered science: How lack of accountability and control has led to animal abuse and poor science “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated. Vivisection is the blackest of all the black crimes that man is at present committing against God and His fair creation. It ill becomes us to invoke in our daily prayers the blessings of God, the Compassionate, if we in turn will not practise elementary compassion towards our fellow creatures.” And, “I abhor vivisection with my whole soul. All the scientific discoveries stained with the innocent blood I count as of no consequence.” Mahatma Gandhi Thanks With thanks to Maneka Gandhi and the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) of India for their report on the use of animals in laboratories, which has been used for this critique of the state of scientific and medical research in India. Animal Defenders International and the National Anti-Vivisection Society UK fully support and encourage the efforts of the members of India’s CPCSEA to enforce standards and controls over the use of animals in laboratories in India, and their recommendation that facilities and practices in India’s research laboratories be brought up to international standards of good laboratory practice, good animal welfare, and good science. Contributors Jan Creamer Tim Phillips Chris Brock Robert Martin ©2003 Animal Defenders International & National Anti-Vivisection Society ISBN: Animal Defenders International 261 Goldhawk Road, London W12 9PE, UK tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Animals and the Art of Empathy D Thomas
    197 RESEARCH ETHICS J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.2003.006387 on 30 March 2005. Downloaded from Laboratory animals and the art of empathy D Thomas ............................................................................................................................... J Med Ethics 2005;31:197–204. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006387 Consistency is the hallmark of a coherent ethical take a big leap of imagination to empathise with the victims of animal experiments as well. In philosophy. When considering the morality of particular short: if we would not want done to ourselves behaviour, one should look to identify comparable what we do to laboratory animals, we should not situations and test one’s approach to the former against do it to them. one’s approach to the latter. The obvious comparator for Animals suffer animal experiments is non-consensual experiments on Crucially for the debate about the morality of people. In both cases, suffering and perhaps death is animal experiments, non-human animals suffer knowingly caused to the victim, the intended beneficiary is just as human ones do. Descartes may have described animals as ‘‘these mechanical robots someone else, and the victim does not consent. Animals [who] could give such a realistic illusion of suffer just as people do. As we condemn non-consensual agony’’ (my emphasis) but no serious scientist experiments on people, we should, if we are to be today doubts that the manifestation of agony is real, not illusory. Indeed, the whole pro-vivisec- consistent, condemn non-consensual experiments on tion case is based on the premise that animals animals. The alleged differences between the two practices are sufficiently similar to us physiologically, and often put forward do not stand up to scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Against Animal Experiments
    The Case Against Animal Experiments Animal experiments are both unethical and unscientific. Animals in laboratories endure appalling suffering, such as being deliberately poisoned, brain-damaged and subjected to inescapable electric shocks. The pain and misery inflicted on the victims is enough, on its own, to make vivisection worthy of public condemnation. But animal “ “ experiments are also bad science, since the results they produce cannot be reliably translated to humans. They therefore offer little hope of advancing medical progress. The Case Against Animal Experiments outlines the suffering of animals used in research, before providing a clear, non-technical description of the scientific problems S E with vivisection. L I www.animalaid.org.uk C I N I M O D © How animals are used Contents Each year around four million How animals are used .......................... 1 animals are experimented on inside British laboratories. The suffering of animals in Dogs, cats, horses, monkeys, laboratories ........................................ 2 rats, rabbits and other animals Cruel experiments .................................... 2 are used, as well as hundreds A failing inspection regime ........................ 3 of thousands of genetically Secrecy and misinformation ...................... 4 modified mice. The most The GM mouse myth ................................ 4 common types of experiment The scientific case against either attempt to test how animal experiments .............................. 5 safe a substance is (toxicity Summary ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Speciesism: a Form of Bigotry Or a Justified View? Evelyn Pluhar
    -------~------------ - SPECIESISM: A FORM OF BIGOTRY OR A JUSTIFIED VIEW? EVELYN PLUHAR Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Fayette Campuscampus Editor's Note: An abridgedabridged version of this paper and thethe commentary on it by Prof.Prof. Sapontzis were delivered atat the December, 1987, meetingmeeting of the Society for the StudyStudy of Ethics and Animals held inin New York City.City. g~;~~~:Fr:iiil~~JmoDs. He ..... York: Dover, 1979 We humans tend to view ourselves as the paradigms of morally considerable beings. Humans, it is often claimed, are the most morally valuable (perhaps the ~ morally PHILOSOPHY valuable) beings on this planet. It is commonly assumed that "lesser" beings 83 BRIWEENBEIWEEN THE SPECIES should be sacrificed for our benefit. When For those who continue to think that it is not pressed to provide a rational defense for the wrong to eat and vivisect non humans, but belief in human pre-eminence, philosophers indefensible to do so to even less well have argued that our autonomous, richly mentally endowed humans, the issue should complex lives warrant our special status. be very pressing indeed. They stand accused Few, however, have argued that humans who of moral inconsistency by two very are incapable of autonomy may properly be different groups. Those who have become sacrificed to further the interests of normal convinced that moral considerability is not humans. restricted to humanity are urging that we cease even the painless exploitation of It was inevitable that this prima facie non humans. According to quite another, inconsistency would be challenged. Writers very disturbing view, we should consider like Peter Singer and Tom Regan advanced exploiting mentally defective humans in the argument from marginal cases to show addition to nonhumans.
    [Show full text]
  • Frances Power Cobbe on Brutes, Women, and the Irish (Human) Landscape: Ethics, Environment, and Imperialism
    Estudios Irlandeses, Special Issue 15.2, 2020, pp. 31-41 https://doi.org/10.24162/EI2020-9742 __________________________________________________________________________________________ AEDEI Frances Power Cobbe on Brutes, Women, and the Irish (Human) Landscape: Ethics, Environment, and Imperialism María José Carrera Universidad de Valladolid, Spain Copyright (c) 2020 by María José Carrera. This text may be archived and redistributed both in electronic form and in hard copy, provided that the author and journal are properly cited and no fee is charged for access. Abstract. This essay focuses on how the Irish philanthropist, feminist, and animal-rights defender Frances Power Cobbe (1822-1904) uses similar terms of reference and methodologies of exposition in the pamphlets and essays she published on “the claims of brutes” and on “the claims of women”. Both discourses are tinged with hues of imperialism proper to her Anglo-Irish upbringing, which deploy a third, less-known interest on the part of Cobbe: “the Irish Question” (O’Connor). To make these points, the essay studies the author’s autobiography and five of her essays and pamphlets: “The Rights of Man and the Claims of Brutes” (1863), “Life in Donegal” (1866), “The Evolution of the Social Sentiment” (1874), “Wife-Torture in England” (1878), and Light in Dark Places (1883). Key Words. Frances Power Cobbe, Antivivisection, Wife-torture, Heteropathy, Ireland, Imperialism. Resumen. El presente ensayo se centra en el semejante uso que la filantropista, feminista y defensora de los animales irlandesa, Frances Power Cobbe (1822-1904) hace de términos de referencia y metodologías expositivas en los panfletos y ensayos que publicó sobre “los derechos de los animales” y “los derechos de las mujeres”.
    [Show full text]
  • Action to End Animal Toxicity Testing
    TH E WA Y FO R W A R D ACTION TO END ANIMAL TOXICITY TESTING REPORT COMPILED FOR THE BUAV BY The British Union for the European Coalition to DR GILL LANGLEY MA, PhD (CANTAB), MIBiol, CBiol Abolition of Vivisection End Animal Experiments Fo r e w o r d INTRODUCING THE EUROPEAN COALITION AND THE BUAV ACTION TO END ANIMAL TOXICITY TESTING The European Coalition to End Animal Experiments, (hereafter ‘the European Animal based toxicity tests cause massive suffering and are of dubious scientific Coalition’), is Europe’s leading alliance of animal protection organisations who have value; their credibility is based on established use rather than reliability or predictive come together to campaign for effective and long-lasting change for laboratory value.i animals. Formed in 1990 by animal groups across Europe, the Coalition now represents members across member states of the European Union plus a range of Testing programmes (such as the one proposed in the European Commission’s White international observer groups drawing together organisations with a range of Paper on a Future Chemicals Policy) could drastically increase the number of animals legislative, scientific and political expertise. Its membership base is currently used in toxicity experiments, or – with sufficient political will – can be used as an expanding to include those member groups in EU accession countries. Current opportunity to bring non-animal tests into use. Observer/Member groups of the European Coalition are as follows: This report demonstrates that animal tests can be replaced with modern, humane Members: ADDA (Spain); Animal Rights Sweden; Animalia (Finland); BUAV (UK); alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ought We to Live with Nonhuman Animals? Peter Singerâ•Žs Answer: Animal Liberation Part I
    BETWEEN THE SPECIES Issue IX August 2009 http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ How Ought We To Live With Nonhuman Animals? Peter Singer’s Answer: Animal Liberation Parts I & II (two papers) PART I Lesley McLean University of New England, Armidale NSW Australia Email address: [email protected] Between the Species, IX, August 2009, http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ Abstract In this paper and the next I discuss Peter Singer’s approach to answering the question of how one ought to live with nonhuman animals. In the first paper I situate Singer’s work within the larger historical context of moral concern for animals, looking at previous public consensus on the issue, its breakdown and its re-emergence with Singer in the 1970s. In the second paper, I take a closer look at Singer’s highly influential book, Animal Liberation (1975), and argue that as activist literature, his chapter on animal experimentation for example can be seen as morally persuasive in ways other than simply as an example of (the consequences) of speciesism. How I do this is to place Singer’s work side by side that of 19th century activist Francis Power Cobbe’s, in particular her pamphlet Light in Dark Places (1883), and examine their work against the criticisms from scientists defending the practice of animal experimentation. Between the Species, IX, August 2009, http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ Peter Singer played a key role in bringing a particular moral problem to light; he came to name this problem in a now famous philosophical treatise. Animal Liberation was first published as a review essay in The New York Review of Books (NYRB) and two years later, in 1975, as a full-length book published by the New York Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Better World for Rabbits
    WINTER 2007 A P U B L I C AT I O N O F T H E A M E R I C A N A N T I -V I V I S E C T I O N SOCIETY Spring Ahead: Creating a Better World for Rabbits VOLUME CXV, NUMBER 1 ISSN 0274-7774 Contents FEATURES Managing Editor 2 A DAmAgeD RAbbit is still A RAbbit: 15 is the Domestic RAbbit the Right Crystal Schaeffer AnD otheR ReAsons why AnimAls compAnion foR you? Copy Editor shoulDn’t be pAtenteD By Caroline Gilbert, Founder/Director, Julie Cooper-Fratrik Rabbit Sanctuary, Inc. By Nina Mak, MS, AAVS Research Analyst Rabbits can be wonderful members of the family. AAVS launched the second phase of its Ban Are they the right companions for you? Animal Patents campaign in March. Our aim now is to stop a patent on rabbits who are subjected to STAFF painful eye experiments in order to develop eye 16 whAt RAbbits Can teAch us About Tracie Letterman, Esq., drop solutions. characteR-builDing Executive Director By Laura Ducceschi, MA, Jeanne Borden, Director of Animalearn Administration Assistant 6 blinDeD foR beAuty: Humane education can be used to help instill RAbbits useD in ProDuct testing Chris Derer, Membership Coordinator reverence and respect for animal life. Laura Ducceschi, Education Director By Vicki Katrinak, AAVS Policy Analyst Heather Gaghan, Director of Rabbits are the most recognized symbol associated Development & Member Services with compassionate shopping. This recognition is 17 DiD you Know? RAbbit Facts Nicole Green, Assistant Director of somewhat dubious, however, since rabbits are so Rabbits are fascinating animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism
    Moral StaDdlDg~ The Va,loe i I~ ~ -~ . ·ft: '_""l"~;'~~~" ~ :.Dl·i: ",_. ,8· .' "...... ll.S',liS·.>,<, - ,', ., -:iv',e'" a S'P::•• .<",' R.G. Frey Bowling Green State University The question of who or what has moral standing, of who or what is a member of the moral community, Editors~Note: has received wide exposure in recent years. Various answers have been extensively canvassed; and This essay by Professor Frey though controversy still envelops claims for the and the comments following it inclusion of the inanimate environment within the by Peter Singer were presented moral community, such claims on behalf of animals at the'Pacific Division Meeting (or, at least, the "higher" animals) are now widely of the Society for the Study of accepted. Morally, then, animals count. I do not Ethics and Animals, held in San myself think that we have needed a great deal of Francisco in March of 1987. argument to establish this point; but numerous writers, obviously, have thought otherwise. In any event, no work of mine has ever denied that animals count. In order to suffer, animals do not have to be self-conscious, to have interests or beliefs or language, to have desires and desires related to their own future, to exercise self-critical control of their behaviour, or to possess rights; and I, a utilitarian, take their sufferings into account, morally. Thus, the scope of the moral community, at least so far as but I have no quarrel with the general claim that ("higher") animals are concerned, is not something I they possess such standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Cactus: the Life of Anna Kingsford
    RED CACTUS: THE LIFE OF ANNA KINGSFORD Alan Pert Books & Writers Copyright © Alan Pert. All rights reserved. This book is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, (for example a fair dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review) no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission. National Library of Australia CIP: Pert, Alan. Red cactus : the life of Anna Kingsford. Bibliography. Includes index. ISBN 9781740184052. 1. Kingsford, Anna Bonus, 1846-1888. 2. Theosophists - Great Britain - Biography. 3. Women physicians - Great Britain - Biography. I. Title. 299.934092 First published in Australia in 2006 Reprinted 2007 Books & Writers Network Pty Ltd P.O. Box W76, Watsons Bay NSW 2030 www.wildandwoolley.com.au Book design: Pat Woolley Set in Fournier In loving memory of my parents Ruby Adele Pert (1917-2004) Ronald Ernest Pert (1916-1994) Contents Chronology of the Life of Anna Kingsford - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -vii Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1 1 Early Years - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -5 2 A Young Woman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -17 3 Marriage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -23 4 Anna’s Own Paper - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -35 5 Anna at Home - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Extrinsic and Intrinsic Arguments: Strategies for Promoting Animal Rights Katherine Perlo Ph.D.†
    Extrinsic and Intrinsic Arguments: Strategies for Promoting Animal Rights Katherine Perlo Ph.D.† Introduction Animal rights campaigners disagree as to whether empirical arguments, based on facts such as those concerning nutrition, or ethical arguments, based on values such as the wrongness of hurting sentient beings, have greater validity and potential effectiveness. I want to address the issue in terms of “extrinsic” and “intrinsic” arguments – a distinction that corresponds only partly to the empirical and ethical couplet – and to make the case that animal rights campaigns are most effectively advanced through intrinsic appeals. “Extrinsic arguments” are those that seek to promote an aim and its underlying principle by appealing to considerations politically, historically, or logically separable from that aim and that principle. “Intrinsic arguments” appeal to considerations within and inseparable from the aim and principle. In this case, the aim is animal liberation and the principle is the moral equality of species. For example, the claim that vegetarianism (ideally, veganism) helps reduce animal suffering is an intrinsic argument, but it can also be justified on extrinsic grounds through appeal to its environmental benefits. You can separate vegetarianism from the benefit to the environment, since it is logically possible that the one might not lead to the other, and environmentalism is an independent political cause. But you cannot separate vegetarianism from the benefit to animals, since the word vegetarianism, whatever its etymology, is used to mean abstention from meat or from all animal products. You might say that “benefit to animals” is an independent issue in that there are other means of ameliorating animal suffering besides vegetarianism, or you might promote vegetarianism only for human health benefits.
    [Show full text]