Habitats Regulations Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Habitats Regulations Assessment South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2034 Final Publication Version 2nd Habitats Regulations Assessment Prepared by LUC in association Air Quality Assessments Ltd December 2018 Project Title: Habitats Regulations Assessment for South Oxfordshire Local Plan Client: South Oxfordshire District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 04/12/18 Draft for client comment Sarah Smith Jeremy Owen Jeremy Owen Natalie Collins Rebecca Turner David Green 2.0 20/12/18 Final for publication Sarah Smith David Green Jeremy Owen David Green Jeremy Owen South Oxfordshire HRA Update Stage 2 Appropriate Assessment Last saved: 20/12/2018 09:18 South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2034 Final Publication Version 2nd Habitats Regulations Assessment Prepared by LUC in association Air Quality Assessments Ltd December 2018 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Executive Summary Introduction This document presents the methodology and findings of the Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2034 Final Publication Version 2nd (due to be published in January 2019), which is being produced by South Oxfordshire District Council. Once adopted, the Local Plan will set out policies and guidance for development in the District over the next 15 years to 2034. Development plans, such as the South Oxfordshire Local Plan, are subject to a process called Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA). The purpose of HRA is to identify any potential adverse effects of a plan on ‘European sites’. European sites comprise those wildlife sites designated for their biodiversity value at European or international level. This includes: Special Protection Areas (SPAs): classified under the Birds Directive1 for the protection of wild birds and their habitats. Special Areas of Conservation (SACs): designated under the Habitats Directive2 and target particular habitats and/or species identified as being of European importance. Ramsar sites: support internationally important wetland habitats and are listed under the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar Convention, 1971). Sites that have started the formal process of becoming designated as one of the above are also considered in an HRA. There are three main stages of HRA, which are as follows: Stage 1: Screening – determining whether the plan could lead to likely significant effects on a European site. Stage 2: Appropriate Assessments – if a likely significant effect is identified in Stage 1, it needs to be determined whether these will lead to an adverse effect on the integrity of the site(s) affected. Stage 3: If adverse effects on integrity are identified in Stage 2, alternative options for the plan must be considered. If there are no possible alternatives that could avoid the adverse effects, the plan will only be acceptable if it can be demonstrated that there are ‘Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest’ for the plan to progress. This report documents Stages 1 and 2, as it was not considered necessary to progress to Stage 3. Methodology This HRA drew on previous iterations of the HRA, which were carried out at earlier stages of the plan- making process. It documents the assessment of the South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2034 Final Publication Version 2nd (due to be published in January 2019), taking into account relevant recent case law (see Chapter 1 of the main report). The HRA focused on the European sites that lie within 17km of the South Oxfordshire District boundary. This distance is based on the average travel to work distance for South Oxfordshire and includes the following sites: Aston Rowant SAC. Kennet and Lambourn Floodplain SAC. Burnham Beeches SAC. Little Wittenham SAC. Chilterns Beechwoods SAC. Oxford Meadows SAC. Cothill Fen SAC. River Lambourn SAC. 1 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds 2 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2034: Final Publication Version 2nd 1 December 2018 HRA Hackpen Hills SAC. Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Hartslock Wood SAC Windsor Forest and Great Park SAC. The HRA also considered the potential for ‘in-combination’ effects of the South Oxfordshire Local Plan with the effects of other plans and projects, in particular development proposed in neighbouring authorities’ local plans. Stage 1: Screening The screening stage of the HRA has taken the approach of screening each Local Plan policy and site allocation individually. This concluded that the some policies could have significant effects on Aston Rowant SAC and/or Little Wittenham SAC, as shown in Table 1 below. Table 1: Outcomes of the HRA Screening stage European site potentially Type of effect Policies with potential to lead to these effects affected Aston Rowant SAC Air pollution STRAT2: South Oxfordshire Housing and Employment Requirements. EMP1: The Amount and Distribution of New B-Class Employment Land. EMP12: Tourism. TRANS1a: Supporting Strategic Transport Investment across the Oxford to Cambridge Arc. TRANS1b: Supporting Strategic Transport Investment. TC1: Retail and Services Growth. Little Wittenham SAC Recreation STRAT2: South Oxfordshire Housing and Employment Requirements. STRAT7: Land at Chalgrove Airfield. STRAT9: Land Adjacent to Culham Science Centre. STRAT10: Land at Berinsfield. H2: New Housing in Didcot. H3: Housing in the Towns of Henley-on-Thames, Thame and Wallingford. H4: Housing in Larger Villages. Stage 2: Appropriate Assessment The Appropriate Assessment considered the effects identified in Table 1 above in more detail. Air pollution Air quality modelling was undertaken to determine whether adverse effects on Aston Rowant SAC would arise as a result of the Local Plan. This was informed by traffic modelling work undertaken by Atkins on behalf of South Oxfordshire District Council. The air quality modelling concluded that both nitrogen oxides and nitrogen deposition would increase at some of the specifc receptor locations at the SAC periphery. These increases would be more than 1% of the long-term environmental standard, which has been used as the threshold above which effects have the potential to be significant. However, the Appropriate Assessment concluded that these effects would not be expected to result in any material changes to the qualifying features of the SAC. This is for a number of reasons, including the fact that South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2034: Final Publication Version 2nd 2 December 2018 HRA figures used are likely to be highly precautionary; the 1% threshold would be exceeded for less than 0.1% of the SAC as a whole, much of the M40 lies within a cutting and the existing habitats within proximity to the road are resilient to the effects of nutrient deposition. Recreation The increase in visitors at Little Wittenham SAC as a result of the Local Plan would be within that predicted and planned for by the Earth Trust, which manages the site. However, the Local Plan, in- combination with other plans is expected to exceed the number of visitors planned for by the Earth Trust. However, adverse effects on integrity are unlikely to occur due to a number of factors. These include the limited sensitivity of the site’s qualifying feature, being its great crested newt population, and suitable existing and planned future management of Little Wittenham SAC. In addition, Policies ENV5 (Green Infrastructure in new developments) and CF5 (Open Space, Sport and Recreation in new residential development) should help to divert visits to Little Wittenham SAC. In-combination effects The Appropriate Assessment took into account potential effects of the Local Plan in-combination with other plans and projects. It was concluded that no adverse effects on the integrity of European sites were likely to arise as a result of in-combination effects. Conclusion This HRA has concluded that the South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2034 Final Publication Version 2nd is not likely to lead to adverse effects on the integrity of any European sites, either alone or in-combination with other plans and projects. South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2034: Final Publication Version 2nd 3 December 2018 HRA Contents 1 Introduction 3 Background to the preparation of the new Local Plan 3 The requirement to undertake Habitats Regulations Assessment of Development Plans 4 Stages of Habitats Regulations Assessment 5 Recent Case Law Changes 6 Previous HRA work 7 Structure of the HRA report 9 2 The Local Plan 11 Summary of the Local Plan 11 Elements of the Local Plan assessed in this HRA 15 Potential impacts of the Local Plan on European sites 18 3 HRA Screening Methodology 20 European sites which may be affected by the Local Plan 20 Assessment of ‘likely significant effects’ of the Local Plan 22 Interpretation of ‘likely significant effect’ 22 Mitigation at the screening stage 23 4 HRA Screening Assessment 24 Identification of other plans and projects which may have ‘in-combination’ effects 33 HRA Screening summary 34 5 Appropriate Assessment 39 Appropriate Assessment approach 39 In-combination
Recommended publications
  • Housing Market Partnership for Hart District Council, Rushmoor Borough
    Housing Market Partnership for the administrative areas of Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Terms of Reference (Version 3) Purpose 1. To ensure the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments are robust and credible in that they will deliver the core outputs and follow the process checklist as appended 2. To receive and consider reports from commissioned consultants (where appropriate) and feedback from the wider stakeholder group 3. To share and pool information and intelligence, including relevant contextual intelligence and policy information on housing land availability, housing market and financial data 4. To support core members in the analysis and interpretation of the assessment data 5. To consider the implications of the assessments, including signing off the assessment reports, core outputs and agreeing follow up action 6. To agree a process by which the SHLAA findings can be regularly reviewed Membership At its outset, the membership will comprise representatives from the following bodies: Hart District Council Rushmoor Borough Council Surrey Heath Borough Council Berkeley Homes Barton Willmore Mitchell and Partners Gregory Gray Associates Annington Property Ltd Barratt Southern Counties Mitchell and Partners Re-Format Architects Sentinel HA Accent Peerless First Wessex Housing Lovell Partnerships The Rund Partnership Rippon Development Services MGA Planning Rio Homes and Estates These are the organisations that attended either the first meeting, the second meeting, or both. Other key stakeholders1 can join the partnership should they wish to do so by contacting either Hart District Council, Rushmoor Borough Council, or Surrey Heath Borough Council. New members will be invited as necessary to ensure that the housing market area is represented with at least one house builder and preferably with other key stakeholders such as local property and planning agents, Registered Social Landlords and key landowners.
    [Show full text]
  • LDF Thank You for the Opportunity to Comment. Surrey Heath Have No
    LDF From: Jane Ireland <[email protected]> Sent: 13 April 2015 16:41 To: LDF Subject: RE: Publication of the Reigate & Banstead Community Infrastructure Levy Draft Charging Schedule Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Surrey Heath have no comments on the CIL charging schedule. Regards Jane Ireland Planning Policy and Support Manager Policy and Conservation Surrey Heath Borough Council Knoll Road Camberley GU15 3HD (01276 707213) www.surreyheath.gov.uk Great Place l Great Community l Great Future From: LDF [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 13 April 2015 12:09 To: LDF Subject: Publication of the Reigate & Banstead Community Infrastructure Levy Draft Charging Schedule Dear Sir/Madam In accordance with Regulation 16 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended), I am writing to inform you of publication of the Reigate and Banstead Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Draft Charging Schedule, and invite your comments on the document. A copy of the CIL Draft Charging Schedule and Statement of Representations Procedure are attached to this email. These documents are also available to view on the Council’s website at www.reigate- banstead.gov.uk/cil, along with a range of relevant evidence and supporting documentation. Documents are also available for inspection at the Town Hall in Reigate and hard copies of all documents are available on request from 01737 276178 or [email protected]. You are encouraged to respond using the standard response form which is also available to download or on request using the details above. Responses must be submitted to the Council by 5pm, Tuesday 26 May 2015: By email to: [email protected]; or By post to: Planning Policy Team, Reigate & Banstead Borough Council, Town Hall, Castlefield Road, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 0SH.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Journal Extracts 1760-1808
    Cuttings about Wheatley from the Oxford Journal 1760 Feb 15 Windmill burnt down due to friction 1763 May 7 John Vaughan bought London Stage Wagon from Ely Stevens, of Forest Hill Dec 9 Wm Kemp sent to Oxford Castle for stealing poultry from Edmund Swan, of Wheatley. 1764 Mar 1 Attorney James Morrell married Elizabeth, daughter of Richard Sheen, of Wheatley May 26 Cricket: Wheatley v local gents’ servants. Servants were winning but last man of Wheatley would not bat. Match not concluded. Oct 6 New windmill to be let or sold. Enquiries Webs(?), Cuddesdon millwright, or Davis, Wheatley schoolmaster 1765 Apr 20 Notice re estate of late Mary Redhead (alias Soames), of Wheatley; debtors to pay no one but sons: John Redhead, baker, Wheatley & Edmund Redhead, baker, born Warboro. May 30 Elizabeth, wife of James Morrell, only child of Mr Sheen, Wheatley, died in childbirth 1766 Mar 4 Mrs Hunt of Shropshire, on a journey, had a fit at died at The Angel, Oxford Wheatley. 1768 Apr 16 New windmill to let. Enquiries: John Lovegrove, Thos. Whorwood’s gardener, Holton, or Wm Webb, millwright, Cud’n Sep 9 Sale of goods of Wm Holliday, surveyor, at his house, by Holloway. Sep 29 Wheatley hiring fair. Notice given by Rod Hurt, Chief Constable 1769 Jul 8 Poultry stolen from Rob Juggins’ hen house Aug 12 Collectors of land and window tax for 1766 still in arrears, order to pay under Sheriff Clarke Dec 5 Thomas Constable and James Strange, of Wheatley, carelessly drove John Redhead’s wagon and van into chariot & Canon Hunt of Ch.Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Homes Grant Local Authority Delivery Phase 1 GDPR Privacy Notice
    Green Homes Grant Local Authority Delivery Phase 1 GDPR Privacy Notice Privacy Notice This notice sets out how Woking Borough Council as the lead authority on behalf of the consortium of the following local authorities Elmbridge Borough Council, Epsom & Ewell Borough Council, Guildford Borough Council, Mole Valley District Council, Reigate & Banstead Borough Council, Spelthorne Borough Council, Surrey Heath Borough Council, Tandridge District Council Waverley Borough Council, Woking Borough Council and Surrey County Council will use your personal data, and your rights. It is made under Articles 13 and/or 14 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This notice relates to data collected under the Green Jump Surrey scheme operated by Woking Borough Council and Action Surrey, which is funded by the Green Homes Grant Local Authority Delivery Scheme (GHG LAD) run by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Action Surrey is an energy efficiency advice service established by Surrey local authorities and operated by ThamesWey Sustainable Communities, a company wholly owned by Woking Borough Council. YOUR DATA The data We will process the following personal data: Customers: - Address and details of property receiving the GHG LAD installation(s) - Details about the GHG LAD installation(s) installed at the property, including type, size and cost - Contact address (if not the property receiving the GHG LAD installation(s)) - Address and details of property offered, but not receiving, the GHG LAD installation(s) - Your
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer Opportunities Across Surrey
    VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES ACROSS SURREY: Age Concern Epsom and Ewell Visiting and Befriending service covering the following areas: KT4, KT6, KT9 KT17 – KT22 SM2 – SM3 Volunteer drivers also required Please contact Liz Hope, Volunteer Co-coordinator Call: 01372 732458 Email: [email protected] Surrey Heath Age Concern Visiting and Befriending service in the following areas: GU15 – GU20 Volunteers drivers also required Please contact Gill Gibson, Charity Manager Call: 01276 707585 Email: [email protected] Age Concern Merstham, Redhill and Reigate Visiting and Befriending service in the following areas: RH1 – RH2, RH6 Volunteer opportunities across Surrey 10/17 Volunteer drivers also required Please contact Sandy Featherstonhaugh, Business Manager Call: 01737 645636 Email: [email protected] Age Concern Banstead Visiting and Befriending service in the following areas: SM2 Call: 01737 352156 Email: [email protected] Age Concern Mole Valley Visiting and Befriending service in the following areas: RH4 – RH5 KT21 – KT23 Please contact: Julia Gallagher, Volunteer Co-ordinator Call: 01306 899104 or 07442 017169 Email: [email protected] Age Concern Woking Visiting and Befriending service in the following areas: GU21 – GU24 Call: 01483 770753 Email: [email protected] Volunteer opportunities across Surrey 10/17 Visiting Friends Visiting and Befriending service and Day Care Service in the following areas: GU21 – GU24 KT12 – KT14 Please contact: Sandra Smook, Manager Call:
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal
    Baldons Neighbourhood Plan Sustainability Appraisal The Baldons NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN Sustainability Appraisal SUBMISSION DRAFT January 2018 1 Baldons Neighbourhood Plan Sustainability Appraisal Contents 1 Purpose of this Report ........................................................................................................ 4 2 Sustainable appraisal methodology ................................................................................... 4 2.1 Approach to SEA .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Stages of Assessment ........................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Stages A and B ...................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Stage C.................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Process ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Personnel ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 Problems encountered ........................................................................................ 7 2.3 Public Engagement ...................................................................................................... 7 3 The Baldons Neighbourhood Plan .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baldons Neighbourhood Plan Area Is Shown in Figure 1.1
    THE BALDONS NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN MADE VERSION SEPTEMBER 2019 The Baldons Neighbourhood Development Plan Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Location .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 The South Oxfordshire Local Plan ....................................................................................... 7 1.4 The Baldons Parish Plan ..................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Process............................................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Consultation ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.6.1 Community Engagement .............................................................................................. 8 1.6.2 Statutory Consultees – Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report .................................. 10 1.6.3 Statutory Consultees –The Draft Plan ......................................................................... 10 1.7 Surveys............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You for the Opportunity to Comment on the Baldons Neighbourhood Plan (BNDP)
    JPPC ref: DB/6596 Planning Policy Team South Oxfordshire District Council SUBMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS [email protected] 23rd March 2018 Dear Sirs RE: Baldons Neighbourhood Plan – Final Publication Stage Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Baldons Neighbourhood Plan (BNDP). We write to make comments on behalf of our client the David R. Young family who own land in the village, notably adjacent to St Peters Church, referenced as site 26-MB in the plan. We applaud the endeavour of the Baldons community in preparing their plan and particularly welcome the laudable aspiration of the document to enhance the village and community through positive development. While supportive of the BNDP’s principles we are concerned by shortcomings in the evidence base, and the apparent disconnect between the plan aspirations and proposed site allocations which represent missed opportunities. With regard to the evidence base we are particularly concerned by the overlooking of sustainable transport connections in the village. The premium bus route between Oxford and Reading, via Wallingford passes immediately adjacent to the plan area and is one of the best services in the district. The basic conditions statement incorrectly states there are no stops in the plan area, this is incorrect as the stop at Golden Balls Roundabout is within it. More fundamentally we believe it is incorrect to overlook such a key public transport route solely because it does not pass directly through the plan area. It is proximate to the settlements and plays a significant role in the sustainability of Marsh Baldon in particular with two stops close by in Nuneham Courtenay.
    [Show full text]
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from the King’S Research Portal At
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The Oxfordshire eyre roll of 1261 Jobson, Adrian Lindsay The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 .... VlA.lA ~ Di.~ e,~X ~ll -ot 1~ \ . INDEX OF P)tRSONS ANi> PLACES Arabic numerals refer to the numbered pleas in the Text and not to pages. ~ENTWUffiLENAMES [?]et, Ric., 702 ABBERB'; Abberbir'; Abberdebir'; Abberebir'.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Sensitive Streets – Briefing Sheet
    Traffic Sensitive Streets – Briefing Sheet Introduction Oxfordshire County Council has a legal duty to coordinate road works across the county, including those undertaken by utility companies. As part of this duty we can designate certain streets as ‘traffic-sensitive’, which means on these roads we can better regulate the flow of traffic by managing when works happen. For example, no road works in the centre of Henley-on-Thames during the Regatta. Sensitive streets designation is not aimed at prohibiting or limiting options for necessary road works to be undertaken. Instead it is designed to open-up necessary discussions with relevant parties to decide when would be the best time to carry out works. Criteria For a street to be considered as traffic sensitive it must meet at least one of the following criteria as set out in the table below: Traffic sensitive street criteria A The street is one on which at any time, the county council estimates traffic flow to be greater than 500 vehicles per hour per lane of carriageway, excluding bus or cycle lanes B The street is a single carriageway two-way road, the carriageway of which is less than 6.5 metres wide, having a total traffic flow of not less than 600 vehicles per hour C The street falls within a congestion charges area D Traffic flow contains more than 25% heavy commercial vehicles E The street carries in both directions more than eight buses per hour F The street is designated for pre-salting by the county council as part of its programme of winter maintenance G The street is within 100 metres of a critical signalised junction, gyratory or roundabout system H The street, or that part of a street, has a pedestrian flow rate at any time of at least 1300 persons per hour per metre width of footway I The street is on a tourist route or within an area where international, national, or significant major local events take place.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Strategic Partnership Plan 2010 - 2020
    Standing up for Surrey Surrey Strategic Partnership Plan 2010 - 2020 This document is available from www.surreycc.gov.uk/communityplanning If you would like more information on the Surrey Strategic Partnership to comment on the Community Strategy to know how you can get involved or contribute to some of the work described in this document Please contact us: Tel: 020 8541 7406 email: [email protected] If you would like this document in large print, on tape or in another language please contact us on: Tel: 03456 009 009 Fax: 020 8541 9004, Minicom: 020 8541 8914 email: [email protected] The Surrey Strategic Partnership produced this plan on behalf of Surrey’s public sector agencies, business, voluntary, community, and faith sectors. This plan fulfils the requirements of the Local Government Act 2000, which requires Surrey County Council to prepare a Sustainable Community Strategy with partners that demonstrates how local organisations and agencies will work together to improve the economic, social and environmental well-being of the county. Contents Contents Foreword by Dr Andrew Povey ................................................................................... 4 Part 1.............................................................................................................................. 6 Surrey in 2020 ............................................................................................................... 8 Five Key Challenges....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spelthorne Borough Council, Council Offices, Knowle Green, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW18 1XB
    Richard Allen Contact: Ann Biggs Planning Inspectorate Department: Regeneration & Growth (via email) Service: Strategic Planning Direct line: 01784 448619 Email [email protected] Date: 23 September 2019 Dear Richard Southampton to London Pipeline Rule 6 Letter – Response to Draft Examination Timetable We are in receipt of the Rule 6 letter in respect of the Southampton to London Pipeline (SLP) scheme accepted by the Planning Inspectorate under the Development Consent Order regime. As a host authority for the route, Spelthorne Borough Council has confirmed its attendance at the Preliminary Meeting to be held on 9 October 2019. We wish to give advance notice to the Examining Authority that we will be raising the following matter at meeting. It appears from the Draft Examination Timetable that the hearings are proposed to be topic-based, covering issues along the length of the route. It is the view of Spelthorne and the other host authorities in Surrey (Runnymede Borough Council, Surrey Heath Borough Council and Surrey County Council) that it would be more practical and productive if the hearings were organised geographically, so that each hearing covered a section of the route with all relevant issues relating to a given section being heard on that day. This would allow for matters to be discussed at greater depth and would be more practical for attendees and participants. We also suggest that the hearings themselves be conducted at a location close to the section of the route being heard on that day and Runnymede BC have offered its council chamber as a potential venue for a hearing covering the northern section of the route.
    [Show full text]