DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Village of Lindenhurst Downtown Walkability Improvement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Village of Lindenhurst Downtown Walkability Improvement 2019 Village of Lindenhurst Downtown Walkability Improvement Study The Village of Lindenhurst Downtown Walkability Improvement Study identified and developed both conceptual and detailed walkability improvements and recommendations to improve downtown walkability and public safety, both pedestrian and vehicular. This study serves as a benchmark demonstrating the Village’s current state of walkability. It provides a framework to guide the selection and planning of improvements that can be pursued to enhance walkability as Downtown Lindenhurst continues to evolve. The Village of Lindenhurst collaborated with the Lindenhurst Economic Development Committee, the Lindenhurst Chamber of Commerce, and Village residents to engage all residents and stakeholders in an open exploration of issues and opportunities pertaining to walkability within the downtown. The Village would like to thank the Suffolk County Department of Economic Development and Planning for funding the development of this study and report. The study is funded through the Suffolk County Economic Development Grant pursuant to Suffolk County Resolution No. 1145-2016. Village of Lindenhurst: 430 South Wellwood Avenue Lindenhurst, NY 11757 (631) 957-7500 villageoflindenhurstny.gov This report online: villageoflindenhurstny.gov Adopted August 13th, 2019 Acknowledgements Suffolk County Legislator Kevin McCaffrey Village of Lindenhurst Michael A. Lavorata, Mayor Maryann Weckerle, Deputy Mayor Joan M. Masterson, Trustee Patrick M. Pichichero, Trustee Richard J. Renna, Trustee Honorable John Bopp, Village Justice Douglas Madlon, Village Administrator Clerk Rick Sorrentino, Superintendent of Public Works Raymond Fais, Public Safety/Emergency Management Coordinator Lindenhurst Economic Development Committee Richard J. Renna, Chairperson Sammy Chu, Committee Member Marian Conway, Committee Member Meg Danaher, Committee Member Robert Sweeney, Committee Member Katherine McCaffrey, Secretary Lindenhurst Chamber of Commerce Lindenhurst Business Improvement District Consultant Team – Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI) Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Study Objectives and Scope ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Planning Approach ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Benefits of Walkability Improvements ......................................................................................................................... 4 Section 2 Downtown Today: Existing Conditions Analysis .............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Downtown Demographics ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Land Use and Market Conditions.............................................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Transportation Infrastructure and Mobility ................................................................................................................ 14 2.4 Parking ..................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Section 3 Looking Forward: Walkability Improvements .................................................................................................. 24 3.1 Pedestrian Safety and Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................ 24 3.2 Cycling Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................................ 31 3.3 Creation of New Public Space: Village Square Extension ........................................................................................ 34 3.4 Placemaking Improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 37 3.5 Parking Improvements .............................................................................................................................................. 39 3.6 Downtown Connectivity ............................................................................................................................................ 43 Section 4 Implementation Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 47 4.1 Walkability Improvements Phasing ........................................................................................................................... 47 4.2 Potential Sources of Funding .................................................................................................................................... 51 4.3 Performance Evaluation and Study Update .............................................................................................................. 53 Section 5 Strategic Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 55 5.1 Continue to Thoroughly Engage the Community ...................................................................................................... 55 5.2 Commit to Prioritizing Active Transportation and Adopt a Complete Streets Policy ................................................. 56 5.3 Develop and Promote Lindenhurst as a Healthy and Sustainable Village ................................................................ 56 5.4 Develop Design Guidelines and Zoning Regulations ................................................................................................ 57 5.5 Follow an Integrated Planning Approach .................................................................................................................. 57 5.6 Assess Implementation Progress and Regularly Update Study................................................................................ 57 References ................................................................................................................................................................................ 59 Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................................... 62 A. Summary of Stakeholder Input ...................................................................................................................................... 62 B. National and International Best Practices ..................................................................................................................... 69 C. Parking Utilization Study ............................................................................................................................................... 80 D. Walkability Improvements Summary ............................................................................................................................. 89 List of Figures Figure 1: Study Area for the Downtown Walkability Improvement Study ..................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Planning Approach ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 3: Benefits of Walkability Improvements ........................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 4: Population (1930-2016)................................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 5: Population by Age Range (2016) .................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 6: Change in Population Age Distribution (2000-2016) ..................................................................................................... 8 Figure 7: Distribution of Type of Housing Units (2016)................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 8: Value of Owner-occupied Housing Units (2016) ........................................................................................................... 8 Figure 9: Vehicle Availability for Occupied Housing Units (2016) ................................................................................................ 8 Figure 10: Median Household Income (2016) .............................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 11: Place of Work for Lindenhurst Residents (2015) ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enhancing Walkability in a Downtown: a Case Study of Adel, Iowa
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Creative Components Dissertations Fall 2020 Enhancing Walkability in a Downtown: A Case Study of Adel, Iowa Yaw Kwarteng Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents Part of the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Kwarteng, Yaw, "Enhancing Walkability in a Downtown: A Case Study of Adel, Iowa" (2020). Creative Components. 656. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents/656 This Creative Component is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Creative Components by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Enhancing Walkability in a Downtown: A Case Study of Adel, Iowa by Yaw Yeboah Kwarteng A creative component submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING Major: Community and Regional Planning Program of Study Committee: Monica Haddad, Major Professor Brian Gelder Sungduck Lee The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this creative component. The Graduate College will ensure this creative component is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2020 Copyright © Cy Cardinal, 2020. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION This report is dedicated to my mum, Akosua Gyapomaa. Your love keeps me going. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten and the Future: Reclaiming Back Alleys for a Sustainable City
    Environment and Planning A 2010, volume 42, pages 2874 ^ 2896 doi:10.1068/a42259 The forgotten and the future: reclaiming back alleys for a sustainable city Jennifer Wolch College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, 230 Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA 94720-1820, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Josh Newellô School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1041, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Mona Seymour Urban Studies Program, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90045-2659, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Hilary Bradbury Huang USC Center for Sustainable Cities, 3518 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0048, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Kim Reynolds School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, 150 East 10th Street, Claremont, CA 91711, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Jennifer Mapes Department of Geography, University of Southern California, 3620 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0255, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Received 10 July 2009; in revised form 29 October 2009; published online 20 September 2010 Abstract. Alleys are enigmatic, neglected features of the urban fabric. In this paper we explore the distribution, physical features, activity patterns, and resident perceptions of alleys in one major US city, Los Angeles, California. We do so through an integrated mixed-methods strategy involving participatory research with community-based organizations, spatial analysis, physical audits and behavioral observation of alleys, and focus groups. Results show that most alleys in Los Angeles are underutilized and walkable, quiet, and clean, although they can be, and are often perceived as, dirty and unsafe.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Fe's Walkability
    Santa Fe’s Walkability Mapping the City’s Urban Strengths CityCity ofof SantaSanta FeFe LandLand UseUse DepartmentDepartment LongLong RangeRange PlanningPlanning DivisionDivision Photo courtesy: Trover, Creative Commons Santa Fe’s Walkability Mapping the City’s Urban Strengths Lisa Martinez, Land Use Department Director Reed Liming, Long Range Planning Division Director Richard Macpherson, Senior Planner David Barsanti, G.I.S. Analyst Gil Martinez, Graphics Designer July, 2017 Walk Score® is a registered trademark of Redfin Real Estate, Seattle, WA. A special thanks to Aleisha Jacobson at Redfin’s Walk Score® office. i Santa Fe’s Walkability … Defining the City’s Urban Core Santa Fe is famed for its historic buildings and narrow streets. Visitors and Measuring Walkability residents value the historic part of the city for its walkability, reflecting how towns and cities felt to residents and visitors before the dominance of the automobile. Measuring walkability and understanding the “ingredients” that are needed Since World War II, however, much of Santa Fe has reflected land development to make a place more walkable has gained increasing interest. The following patterns with more spread-out, suburban-style subdivisions and large commercial analysis shows those areas of Santa Fe that have the greatest levels of walkability tracts with over-sized parking lots. This development trend is based on the car and as measured by the nearness (usually a 5-10 minute walk) of key daily needs reflects modern development patterns found in virtually every U.S. town and city. and desires of residents, including: Schools, Parks, Grocery Stores, Restaurants, Errands, Shopping and Cultural Activities. Walkability Walk Score® is a tool used to determine which parts of Santa Fe are the most While Santa Feans may enjoy walking around their neighborhood and enjoy the walkable and therefore, from a planning standpoint, reflect the most efficient uses area where they live, “walkability” as used in this report defines those areas in which of land.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Walkability Report
    MALDEN WALKABILITY REPORT 2020 2ND Report of the Mayor’s Advisory Committee on Walkability Report written by: Christina Murphy, Kristine Glynn, and Michael O’Donnell. Table of Contents Introduction 1. Walkability in Malden 2. Reports and Existing Conditions 3. Successes 4. Planning for the Future 2023 5. Appendices 2 1 Walkability In Malden Mission Statement The Mayor’s Advisory Committee on Walkability recognizes walking as a legitimate means of transportation. We promote walking for the physical and mental health of residents and visitors, for the sense of community and support of local business, and to reduce traffic and air pollution. We advocate for a pleasant sustainable environment for walking and for pedestrian safety for all ages and abilities. Key Physical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Malden is a 5.1 square mile, densely populated city of approximately 60,000+ people north of Boston. Malden has been designated a “gateway” community with a history of strong economies and an ethnically and linguistically diverse population1. Immigrants are no stranger to the community that rests on the banks of the Malden River as Irish and Italians came to work in factories after the turn of the century, and many Jewish who left Europe after World War II also migrated to Malden. Now, immigrants from China, Haiti, Brazil and more are calling Malden home. In 2013, 45% of Malden residents were foreign-born, a sharp increase from 26% in 2000, accounting for more than 10,000 additional residents being born outside of the United States1. According to the 2017 ACS data (American Community Survey), the population of Malden continues to be diverse with 46.6% white, 23.6% Asian, 16.3% Black or African American, Latinx 11.5% and multiracial 14.9%.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Features Influence Walking Speed: the Effect of Urban
    land Article Environmental Features Influence Walking Speed: The Effect of Urban Greenery Marek Franˇek* and Lukáš Režný Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-49-333-2374 Abstract: The study investigated the rarely addressed topic of how visual environmental features can influence walking speed. Young adult participants were asked to walk on a route that leads through areas composed of urban parks and areas with a built environment with a large amount of greenery. Their walking speed was measured in selected sections. The participants walked with a small video camera, and their walk was recorded. The temporal information was derived from the video recordings. Subsequently, the participants evaluated the environmental features of the route by specific spatio-cognitive dimensions of environmental preference. The results show that walking speed in specific sections of the walking route systematically differed and reflected the environmental features. The walking speed was lower in sections with high natural characteristics and a high environmental preference. Noise here was perceived as less annoying than in sections with lower natural characteristics. The results are explained in terms of approach avoidance behavior. The findings are in accordance with environmental preference research that documents various benefits of walking in the natural environment. Citation: Franˇek,M.; Režný, L. Keywords: walking speed; greenery; urban environment; stress; relaxation Environmental Features Influence Walking Speed: The Effect of Urban Greenery. Land 2021, 10, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/ 1. Introduction land10050459 Recently, physical inactivity has been a major public health problem [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Analysis of Walkability in Suburban Neighborhoods in Las Vegas
    MNTRC Study: A Study Factors of that Transit Detroit Regional Enable Inhibit and Effective Transit Regional Report MNTRC 12-22 MINETA NATIONAL TRANSIT RESEARCH CONSORTIUM Funded by U.S. Department of Transportation Modeling and Analysis of Walkability in Suburban Neighborhoods in Las Vegas MNTRC Report 12-72 March 2014 March MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Interim President and CEO be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. American Public Transportation Transportation Association (APTA) Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Vice Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Walkability with GIS—Methods Overview and New Approach Proposal
    sustainability Article Measuring Walkability with GIS—Methods Overview and New Approach Proposal Agnieszka Telega 1,*, Ivan Telega 2 and Agnieszka Bieda 3 1 Department of Real Estate and Investment Economics, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, Poland 2 Department of Mathematics, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing of Environment and Spatial Engineering, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-12-293-5526 Abstract: Cities occupy only about 3% of the Earth’s surface area, but half of the global population lives in them. The high population density in urban areas requires special actions to make these areas develop sustainably. One of the greatest challenges of the modern world is to organize urban spaces in a way to make them attractive, safe and friendly to people living in cities. This can be managed with the help of a number of indicators, one of which is walkability. Of course, the most complete analyses are based on spatial data, and the easiest way to implement them is using GIS tools. Therefore, the goal of the paper is to present a new approach for measuring walkability, which is based on density maps of specific urban functions and networks of generally accessible pavements and paths. The method is implemented using open-source data. Density values are interpolated from point data (urban objects featuring specific functions) and polygons (pedestrian infrastructure) using Kernel Density and Line Density tools in GIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Design Support Tools for Walkability: a Guide for Urban Analysts
    sustainability Review Planning and Design Support Tools for Walkability: A Guide for Urban Analysts Ivan Bleˇci´c 1, Tanja Congiu 2,* , Giovanna Fancello 3 and Giuseppe Andrea Trunfio 2 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Architecture (DICAAR), University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Architecture, Design and Urban Planning (DADU), University of Sassari, 07041 Alghero, Italy; trunfi[email protected] 3 UMR Géographie-cités (CNRS, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Université Paris Diderot, EHESS), 75006 Paris, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 February 2020; Accepted: 20 May 2020; Published: 28 May 2020 Abstract: We present a survey of operational methods for walkability analysis and evaluation, which we hold show promise as decision-support tools for sustainability-oriented planning and urban design. An initial overview of the literature revealed a subdivision of walkability studies into three main lines of research: transport and land use, urban health, and livable cities. A further selection of articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases focused on scientific papers that deal with walkability evaluation methods and their suitability as planning and decision-support tools. This led to the definition of a taxonomy to systematize and compare the methods with regard to factors of walkability, scale of analysis, attention on profiling, aggregation methods, spatialization and sources of data used for calibration and validation. The proposed systematization aspires to offer to non-specialist but competent urban analysts a guide and an orienteering, to help them integrate walkability analysis and evaluation into their research and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Walkable-And-Bikeable-Cities.Pdf
    WALKABLE AND BIKEABLE CITIES: LESSONS FROM SEOUL AND SINGAPORE AND BIKEABLE CITIES: LESSONS FROM WALKABLE AND WALKABLE BIKEABLE CITIES LESSONS FROM SEOUL AND SINGAPORE WALKABLEAND BIKEABLE LESSONS FROM SEOUL CITIES AND SINGAPORE For product information, please contact Project Team Nicole Chew +65 66459628 Seoul Centre for Liveable Cities Project Co-lead : Dr Chang Yi, Research Fellow, the Global Future 45 Maxwell Road #07-01 Research Center, the Seoul Institute The URA Centre Researchers : Dr Gyeong Sang Yoo, Associate Research Fellow, Department of Singapore 069118 Transportation System Research, the Seoul Institute [email protected] Dr Hyuk-Ryul Yun, Senior Research Fellow, Director of the Office of Planning & Coordination, the Seoul Institute Cover photo: Mira Lee, Researcher, Department of Transportation System Research, Singapore - Courtesy of URA (below) the Seoul Institute Singapore Project Co-lead : Dr Limin Hee, Director, Centre for Liveable Cities Researchers : Remy Guo, Senior Assistant Director, Centre for Liveable Cities Nicole Chew, Manager, Centre for Liveable Cities Erin Tan, Manager, Centre for Liveable Cities Dionne Hoh, Manager, Centre for Liveable Cities Ng Yi Wen, Executive Planner, Urban Redevelopment Authority Chris Zhou, Assistant Manager, Land Transport Authority Editor : Grace Chua, Adjunct Editor, Centre for Liveable Cities Supporting Agencies : Urban Redevelopment Authority Land Transport Authority Printed on Enviro Wove, an FSC certified recycled paper. E-book ISBN 978-981-11-0103-8 Paperback ISBN 978-981-11-0105-2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pleasure of Walking: an Innovative Methodology to Assess Appropriate Walkable Performance in Urban Areas to Support Transport Planning
    sustainability Article The Pleasure of Walking: An Innovative Methodology to Assess Appropriate Walkable Performance in Urban Areas to Support Transport Planning Letizia Appolloni, Maria Vittoria Corazza * and Daniela D’Alessandro Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (L.A.); [email protected] (D.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-06-44585718 Received: 21 May 2019; Accepted: 20 June 2019; Published: 24 June 2019 Abstract: The Walking Suitability Index of the Territory–T-WSI is an innovative methodology to assess walkability. Unlike other methods and tools in this field designed to evaluate walkability on given origin-destination paths, T-WSI is conceived for area-wide assessments, typically at the neighborhood level. This can be achieved by visual surveys to collect data, which are easy to perform at street level, their further process via an algorithm, and their aggregation to assess the walking performance levels of the test area. The paper describes such methodology, which includes the development of 12 indicators associated with four main evaluation categories (Practicability, Safety, Urbanity and Appeal), and its application to a case study in a medium-size town in central Italy. Results are described and elaborated to highlight T-WSI’s contribution to help decision makers in the urban governance process, typically in the fields of land use, mobility management and maintenance, coherently with the research objective to enlarge the potential of walkability methodologies thus far available up to area-level assessment. Keywords: walkability; urban environment; neighborhood; pedestrians 1. Introduction Every trip, generally, starts and ends with walking.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Sidewalk and Corridor Walkability in Developing Countries
    sustainability Article Assessing Sidewalk and Corridor Walkability in Developing Countries Khaled Shaaban Department of Civil Engineering/Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar; [email protected]; Tel.: +974-4403-4185 Received: 31 May 2019; Accepted: 1 July 2019; Published: 16 July 2019 Abstract: Finding a simple and less expensive method to assess and improve sidewalk and corridor conditions in developing countries is essential in order to motivate more people to walk. This study aimed to design and test a method that uses direct observations of driver behavior and street measurements to assess sidewalk and corridor walkability in developing countries. The proposed method includes different walkability indicators related to sidewalk features, crossing facilities, sidewalk facilities, and driver behavior to provide one score that represents the walkability of a sidewalk and one that represents the walkability of a corridor. The method was tested on streets from 10 neighborhoods in the city of Doha, Qatar. The results indicated that the developed method was easy to use and could efficiently measure various indicators, illustrating that it can be used to evaluate corridors with different characteristics to identify and rank areas that require improvement. The study’s findings will provide maintenance agencies, policymakers, and practitioners in developing countries with a simple, efficient, and cost-effective method to evaluate, plan, rank, and improve the walkability of sidewalks and corridors. Keywords: physical activity; pedestrian; active transportation; walking behavior; neighborhood environment; neighborhood walkability 1. Introduction Walking is one of the easiest and least expensive forms of physical activity. Walking is needed to keep people healthy as it can help prevent many diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension.
    [Show full text]
  • Walkable City, Living Streets
    Walkable City, Living Streets October 2012 Simon Ng, Wilson Lau, Fred Brown, Eva Tam, Mandy Lao and Veronica Booth 社 區 連 Vitality 繫 可達性 Accessiblity 行人 Pedestrian 城 市 密度 Density 設 計 1 About Civic Exchange Civic Exchange is a Hong Kong-based non-profit public policy think tank that was established in October 2000. It is an independent organisation that has access to policy-makers, officials, businesses, media and NGOs—reaching across sectors and borders. Civic Exchange has solid research experience in areas such as air quality, energy, urban planning, climate change, conservation, water, governance, political development, equal opportunities, poverty and gender. For more information about Civic Exchange, visit www.civic-exchange.org. About the authors Simon Ng is Head of Transport and Sustainable Research of Civic Exchange. His major research interests include sustainable transportation, liveable cities, air quality management, energy issues and local community planning. Simon is known for his work on ship emissions inventory and control in Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta. He is also passionate about making Hong Kong a better place to live. Wilson Lau is the Research and Projects Coordinator at Civic Exchange. His research is broadly centered around liveability issues, which includes nature conservation, city well-being and urban walkability. Fred Brown is the Honorary Chairman of MVA and has over 35 years international experience in transport and traffic planning and development. He has taken a leading role with MVA in promoting priority to public transport and pedestrians over the past thirty years, as far back as the development of the extensive pedestrian networks in Central and the Mid-levels escalator in the early 1980s.
    [Show full text]