Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation –

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation – Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation – Phase I Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Used Fuel Disposition Yifeng Wang & Teklu Hadgu Sandia National Laboratories Scott Painter, Dylan R. Harp & Shaoping Chu Los Alamos National Laboratory Thomas Wolery Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jim Houseworth Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory September 28, 2012 FCRD-UFD-2012-000229 SAND2012-7073P DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy‘s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Integrated Tool Development for UFD Natural System Evaluation 9/1/2012 iii Integrated Tool Development for UFD Natural System Evaluation iv 9/1/2012 Integrated Tool Development for UFD Natural System Evaluation 9/1/2012 v Executive Summary The natural barrier system (NBS) is an integral part of a geologic nuclear waste repository. From a generally accepted multiple barrier concept, each barrier is supposed to be utilized for its safety function independently to its optimal extent. In this sense the NBS needs to be evaluated and necessary research conducted to ensure its optimal safety function. As one of its main objectives, the natural system evaluation and tool development package will ensure that sufficient research will be conducted to fully exploit the credits that can be taken for the NBS. The work documented in this report is aimed to develop an integrated modeling framework that can be used for systematically analyzing the performance of a natural barrier system and identifying key factors that control the performance of the system. This framework is designed as an integrated tool for prioritization and programmatic decisions of UFDC natural system R&D activities, and it includes three key components: (1) detailed process models (with appropriate levels of fidelity) for flow field and radionuclide transport, (2) a probabilistic performance assessment capability, and (3) an associated technical database supporting model calculations. The integrated tool development for natural system evaluation adopts a phased approach. This report documents the results of phase I activities, which are focused on identifying relevant tools for subsystem analyses and performing preliminary demonstrations. Major FY12 accomplishments are summarized as follows: Two separate modeling frameworks were explored using different combinations of process simulators and performance assessment drivers: (1) PFLOTRAN + PEST and (2) FEHM + DAKOTA. Their preliminary application to flow and radionuclide transport in fractured granite and dolomite media was demonstrated using Monte-Carlo simulations. The potential application of a ―plug-and-play‖ concept, common data format, and high performance computing techniques were explored. Calibration-constrained uncertainty analyses were performed for a flow field in a hypothetical fractured granite medium using PFLOTRAN and PEST. The modeling frameworks were demonstrated to be able to incorporate or use real field data (transmissivity fields), the dual-porosity capability of transport code (FEHM), the high performance parallel computing capability of PA driver (DAKOTA), and the embedded LHS sampling and statistical analysis techniques (DAKOTA). A comprehensive review of thermodynamic data relevant to nuclear waste disposal was performed, and the related data gaps were identified, especially for layered aluminosilicates. A comprehensive literature survey and data compilation were performed for modeling the near- field thermal-hydrological-mechanical-chemical evolution of a clay repository and for modeling flow and radionuclide transport in a fractured granite medium. These data will be used to develop an appropriate data model for UFDC data management. Future work will include: Move the integrated tool development from phase I into phase II by merging the existing two separate modeling frameworks into a single integrated framework. Develop the capability to incorporate an advanced flow-transport model for fractured geologic media, such as a discrete fracture network (DFN) flow model, into the framework. Continue to explore and demonstrate the capability of model parameter estimation and uncertainty analyses using the established framework. Continue data collection and synthesis to establish a comprehensive technical database for natural system evaluation. Integrated Tool Development for UFD Natural System Evaluation vi 9/1/2012 Integrated Tool Development for UFD Natural System Evaluation 9/1/2012 vii Table of Contents 1.0 Development of Integrated Tools for UFD Natural System Evaluation: An 1 Introduction 1.1 Objectives 1 1.2 Technical Approach 2 1.3 Structure of This Report 3 1.4 Reference 4 2.0 Development of an Integrated Process Modeling Framework for 5 Performance Assessments of Natural Barrier Systems 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Design Considerations for a Next-Generation PA framework 5 2.2.1 Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis 6 2.2.2 File formats 8 2.3 Concept for a Generic Granitic Repository and Associated Assessment Framework 9 2.4 Tool Demonstration 11 2.4.1 Synthetic example 11 2.4.2 Workflow 13 2.4.3 Storage and organization 17 2.5 Example Assessment 17 2.6 Conclusions 25 2.7 References 26 3.0 Integrated Tool Development for Far-Field Radionuclide Transport in a Salt 28 Repository 3.1 Introduction 28 3.2 Generic Salt Repository and Model Setup 30 3.2.1 Description of FEHM Reservoir Simulator 30 3.2.2 Description of DAKOTA 31 3.2.4 Parallel version of DAKOTA-FEHM 32 3.3 Tool Demonstration 33 3.3.1 Flow simulations 34 3.3.2 Deterministic transport simulations 41 3.3.3 Probabilistic transport simulations 45 3.3.3.1 Simulations of iodine transport 46 3.3.3.2 Simulations of PU(IV) transport 52 3.3.3.3 Simulations of U(VI) transport 58 3.4 Summary 63 3.5 References 63 4.0 Disposal Systems Material Properties: Thermodynamic Data Collection and 65 Synthesis 4.1 Introduction 65 4.2 Uses of Thermodynamic Data in Repository Studies 66 4.3 Types of Thermodynamic Data 67 4.4 Issues with Thermodynamic Data: General 69 4.5 Sources of Thermodynamic Data 70 4.6 Data Gaps 71 Integrated Tool Development for UFD Natural System Evaluation viii 9/1/2012 4.7 A Key Data Issue: The Entropies of the Chemical Elements in Their Reference Forms 76 4.8 A Core Data Issue: Thermodynamic Data for Aluminosilicate Minerals 80 4.9 Data Management Requirements 82 4.10 Data Management Records 85 4.11 References 85 5.0 Compilation of Key Technical Data for the Evaluation of Generic Disposal 90 Environments 5.1 Introduction 90 5.2 Data for THMC Modeling of the Near Field of a Clay Repository 90 5.2.1 Hydrologic Model 91 5.2.2 Mechanical Model 93 5.2.3 Chemical Model 95 5.2.4 Thermal Model 102 5.2.5 Non-Environment-Specific Parameters 103 5.3 Data for Modeling Granite Far Field Flow and Transport 103 5.4 References 120 6.0 Summary and Future Work 125 Integrated Tool Development for UFD Natural System Evaluation 9/1/2012 1 1.0 Development of Integrated Tools for UFD Natural System Evaluation: An Introduction 1.1 Objectives The natural barrier system is an integral part of a geologic nuclear waste repository. Spatially, it extends from a so-called disturbed rock zone, created by mechanical, thermal and chemical perturbations due to underground excavation or waste emplacement, to the surrounding geologic media, and continues all the way to a specified repository boundary. The work package of natural system evaluation and tool development supports the following Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) objectives (Nutt, 2011): 1. Develop a fundamental understanding of disposal system performance in a range of environments for potential wastes that could arise from future nuclear fuel cycle alternatives through theory, simulation, testing, and experimentation. 2. Develop a computational modeling capability for the performance of storage and disposal options for a range of fuel cycle alternatives, evolving from generic models to more robust models of performance assessment. From a well-accepted multiple barrier concept for waste repository safety, each barrier is to be independently utilized for its safety function to its optimal extent. In this sense the natural barrier needs to be evaluated and necessary research conducted to ensure its optimal safety function. From a repository design point of view, an appropriate balance must be maintained between the natural barrier system (NBS) and the engineered barrier system (EBS) in the contribution to the total system performance. In practice, there is a risk to place too much reliance on the engineered barrier while not fully taking credits for the natural system. Such practice often results in an overly conservative, very expensive EBS design. Thus, as one of its main objectives, the natural system evaluation and tool development package will ensure that sufficient research will be conducted to fully exploit the credits that can be taken for the NBS. In FY11, a detailed research plan was developed for the NBS evaluation and tool development (Wang, 2011). In that plan, a total of 27 key research topics were identified.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction CFD General Notation System (CGNS)
    CGNS Tutorial Introduction CFD General Notation System (CGNS) Christopher L. Rumsey NASA Langley Research Center Outline • Introduction • Overview of CGNS – What it is – History – How it works, and how it can help – The future • Basic usage – Getting it and making it work for you – Simple example – Aspects for data longevity 2 Introduction • CGNS provides a general, portable, and extensible standard for the description, storage, and retrieval of CFD analysis data • Principal target is data normally associated with computed solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations & its derivatives • But applicable to computational field physics in general (with augmentation of data definitions and storage conventions) 3 What is CGNS? • Standard for defining & storing CFD data – Self-descriptive – Machine-independent – Very general and extendable – Administered by international steering committee • AIAA recommended practice (AIAA R-101A-2005) • Free and open software • Well-documented • Discussion forum: [email protected] • Website: http://www.cgns.org 4 History • CGNS was started in the mid-1990s as a joint effort between NASA, Boeing, and McDonnell Douglas – Under NASA’s Advanced Subsonic Technology (AST) program • Arose from need for common CFD data format for improved collaborative analyses between multiple organizations – Existing formats, such as PLOT3D, were incomplete, cumbersome to share between different platforms, and not self-descriptive (poor for archival purposes) • Initial development was heavily influenced by McDonnell Douglas’ “Common
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Coupling Approach for Multi-Physics Analyses of Fusion Reactors
    Development of a coupling approach for multi-physics analyses of fusion reactors Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Ingenieurwissenschaften (Dr.-Ing.) bei der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Maschinenbau des Karlsruher Instituts fur¨ Technologie (KIT) genehmigte DISSERTATION von Yuefeng Qiu Datum der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 12. 05. 2016 Referent: Prof. Dr. Stieglitz Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Moslang¨ This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Share Alike 3.0 DE License (CC BY-SA 3.0 DE): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/ Abstract Fusion reactors are complex systems which are built of many complex components and sub-systems with irregular geometries. Their design involves many interdependent multi- physics problems which require coupled neutronic, thermal hydraulic (TH) and structural mechanical (SM) analyses. In this work, an integrated system has been developed to achieve coupled multi-physics analyses of complex fusion reactor systems. An advanced Monte Carlo (MC) modeling approach has been first developed for converting complex models to MC models with hybrid constructive solid and unstructured mesh geometries. A Tessellation-Tetrahedralization approach has been proposed for generating accurate and efficient unstructured meshes for describing MC models. For coupled multi-physics analyses, a high-fidelity coupling approach has been developed for the physical conservative data mapping from MC meshes to TH and SM meshes. Interfaces have been implemented for the MC codes MCNP5/6, TRIPOLI-4 and Geant4, the CFD codes CFX and Fluent, and the FE analysis platform ANSYS Workbench. Furthermore, these approaches have been implemented and integrated into the SALOME simulation platform. Therefore, a coupling system has been developed, which covers the entire analysis cycle of CAD design, neutronic, TH and SM analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Keys for Practical Understanding and Use of CGNS
    Seven keys for practical understanding and use of CGNS Marc Poinot∗ Christopher L. Rumseyy SAFRAN NASA Langley Research Center [email protected] [email protected] We present key features of the CGNS standard, focusing on its two main elements, the data model (CGNS/SIDS) and its implementations (CGNS/HDF5 and CGNS/Python). The data model is detailed to emphasize how the topological user oriented information, such as families, are separated from the actual meshing that could be split or modified during the CFD workflow, and how this topological information is traced during the meshing process. We also explain why the same information can be described in multiple ways and how to handle such alternatives in an application. Two implementations, using HDF5 and Python, are illustrated in several use examples, both for archival and interoperability purposes. The CPEX extension formalized process is explained to show how to add new features to the standard in a consensual way; we present some of the next extensions to come. Finally we conclude by showing how powerful a consensual public approach like CGNS can be, as opposed to a stand-alone private one. All throughout the paper, we demonstrate how the use of CGNS could be of great benefit for both the meshing and CFD solver communities. I. Introduction The CFD General Notation System12 (CGNS) is a public standard for the CFD community. It has had more than 20 years of feedback from users throughout the world in industry, universities, and government research labs. The CGNS name is now well known in the CFD community, but it is often only associated with the CGNS library (CGNS/MLL) used by CFD tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Software Using HDF5 by Name (December 2017)
    Summary of Software Using HDF5 by Name (December 2017) Name (with Product Open Source URL) Application Type / Commercial Platforms Languages Short Description ActivePapers (http://www.activepapers File format for storing .org) General Problem Solving Open Source computations. Freely available SZIP implementation available from Adaptive Entropy the German Climate Encoding Library Special Purpose Open Source Computing Center IO componentization of ADIOS Special Purpose Open Source different IO transport methods Software for the display and Linux, Mac, analysis of X-Ray diffraction Adxv Visualization/Analysis Open Source Windows images Computer graphics interchange Alembic Visualization Open Source framework API to provide standard for working with electromagnetic Amelet-HDF Special Purpose Open Source data Bathymetric Attributed File format for storing Grid Data Format Special Purpose Open Source Linux, Win32 bathymetric data Basic ENVISAT Toolbox for BEAM Special Purpose Open Source (A)ATSR and MERIS data Bers slices and holomy Bear Special Purpose Open Source representations Unix, Toolkit for working BEAT Visualization/Analysis Open Source Windows,Mac w/atmospheric data Cactus General Problem Solving Problem solving environment Rapid C++ technical computing environment,with built-in HDF Ceemple Special Purpose Commercial C++ support Software for working with CFD CGNS Special Purpose Open Source Analysis data Tools for working with partial Chombo Special Purpose Open Source differential equations Command-line tool to convert/plot a Perkin
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Data Into Visit
    LLNL-SM-446033 Getting Data Into VisIt July 2010 Version 2.0.0 Brad Whitlock wrence La Livermore National Laboratory ii DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade- mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Liver- more National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. iii iv Table of Contents Introduction Manual chapters . 2 Manual conventions . 2 Strategies . 2 Picking a strategy . 3 Definition of terms . 4 Creating compatible files Creating a conversion utility or extending a simulation . 7 Survey of database reader plug-ins. 9 BOV file format . 9 X-Y Curve file format. 12 Plain text ASCII files .
    [Show full text]
  • AIAA Paper 2012-1264
    AIAA-2012-1264 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 9 – 12, 2012, Nashville, TN Recent Updates to the CFD General Notation System (CGNS) Christopher L. Rumsey∗ NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681 Bruce Wedan† Computational Engineering Solutions, San Ramon, CA 94582 Thomas Hauser‡ University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309 Marc Poinot§ ONERA - The French Aerospace Lab, F-92322 Chatillon, FRANCE The CFD General Notation System (CGNS)—a general, portable, and extensible standard for the storage and retrieval of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis data—has been in existence for more than a decade (Version 1.0 was released in May 1998). Both structured and unstructured CFD data are covered by the standard, and CGNS can be easily extended to cover any sort of data imaginable, while retaining backward compatibility with existing CGNS data files and software. Although originally designed for CFD, it is readily extendable to any field of computational analysis. In early 2011, CGNS Version 3.1 was released, which added significant capabilities. This paper describes these recent enhancements and highlights the continued usefulness of the CGNS methodology. Glossary of Terms ADF CGNS Advanced Data Format, www.grc.nasa.gov/www/cgns/CGNS docs current/adf API Application Programming Interface CGIO CGNS low-level library, www.grc.nasa.gov/www/cgns/CGNS docs current/cgio CHLone CGNS special purpose C library (for HDF5 files only), chlone.sourceforge.net CGNS CFD General Notation System, cgns.org CGNSTalk CGNS user forum,
    [Show full text]
  • BASEMENT Reference Manual
    BASEMENT System Manuals VAW - ETH Zurich v2.8.1 BASEMENT System Manuals VAW - ETH Zurich v2.8.1 Contents Preamble 5 Credits . 5 License ......................................... 7 1 Pre-Processing in QGIS with BASEmesh 11 1.1 Introduction . 11 1.2 Tutorial 1: Mesh Generation based on Pointwise Elevation Data . 12 1.2.1 Project Settings . 13 1.2.2 Coordinate Reference System Configuration . 14 1.2.3 Loading Input Data for Elevation Model . 14 1.2.4 Saving Layer as Shape File . 15 1.2.5 Loading the Model Boundary . 15 1.2.6 Editing the Model Boundary . 17 1.2.7 Loading Breakline Data . 19 1.2.8 Creation of the Elevation Model as TIN . 20 1.2.9 Adaption of the Breaklines for Quality Meshing . 21 1.2.10 Creation of Region Marker Points . 22 1.2.11 Creation of Quality Mesh . 24 1.2.12 Interpolating elevation data from elevation mesh (TIN) . 25 1.2.13 3D view of the mesh . 26 1.2.14 Export of mesh to 2dm . 27 1.3 Tutorial 2: Import/Modify an existing Mesh and use Raster Data as Elevation Model . 28 1.3.1 Importing a .2dm mesh file . 29 1.3.2 Modifying the material indices of elements . 29 1.3.3 Manual editing of mesh elements . 33 1.3.4 Renumbering the mesh . 34 1.3.5 Interpolating elevations from raster data . 35 1.4 Tutorial 3: Using dividing constraints along boundary cross sections and setting up a BASEMENT simulation with a mesh from BASEmesh . 35 1.4.1 Using dividing constraints for Quality meshing .
    [Show full text]
  • About Pycgns 3 1.1 CGNS Standard
    pyCGNS.intro/Manual Release 4.2.0 Marc Poinot August 27, 2007 CONTENTS 1 About pyCGNS 3 1.1 CGNS Standard...........................................3 1.2 Package contents...........................................4 1.3 Quick start..............................................5 2 Build and Install 7 2.1 Required libraries..........................................7 2.2 Optional libraries...........................................7 2.3 Installation process..........................................8 2.4 Single module installation......................................8 2.5 Configuration file contents......................................8 2.6 NAV depends.............................................9 2.7 MAP depends............................................9 2.8 WRA depends............................................9 3 Glossary 11 4 PDF Docs 13 i ii pyCGNS.intro/Manual, Release 4.2.0 Release 4.2 • CGNS.MAP is now a wrapper to CHLone python module • CGNS.WRA reborn, re-coding using Cython • CGNS.VAL reborn • completely new CGNS.NAV using Qt, VTK and Cython • YouTube demos here The package gathers various tools and libraries for CGNS end-users and Python application developpers. The main object of pyCGNS is to provide the application developpers with a Python interface to CGNS/SIDS, the data model. The MAP and PAT modules are dedicated to this goal: map the CGNS/SIDS data model the CGNS/Python implementation. The WRA module contains wrapper on CGNS/MLL and a MLL-like set of functions that uses the CGNS/Python mapping as implementation. The NAV module supports the CGNS.NAV graphical browser, with nice features about tree exploration, copy/paste and even global node changes. Then, the VAL module is a parser engine for CGNS/Python tree compliance checking. The CGNS.VAL tool can analyze your CGNS/HDF5 file and returns you a large panel of diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • MASS2, Modular Aquatic Simulation System in Two Dimensions, User
    PNNL-14820-2 MASS2 Modular Aquatic Simulation System in Two Dimensions User Guide and Reference W. A. Perkins M. C. Richmond September 2004 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830 DISCLAIMER United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO1830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Formats for Visualization and I T Bilit Interoperability
    Data Formats for Visualization and Int eroperabilit y Steve Lantz Senior Research Associate 10/27/2008 www.cac.cornell.edu 1 How will you store your data? • Raw binary is compact but not portable – “Unformatted,” machine-specific representation – Byte-order issues: big endian (IBM) vs. little endian (Intel) • Formatted text is portable but not compact – Need to know all the details of formatting just to read the data – 1 byyygg()te of ASCII text stores only a single decimal digit (~3 bits) – Most of the fat can be knocked out by compression (gzip, bzip, etc.) – However, compression is impractical and slow for large files • Need to consider how data will ultimately be used – Are you trying to ensure future portability? – Will your favored analysis tools be able to read the data? – What storage constraints are there? 10/27/2008 www.cac.cornell.edu 2 Issues beyond the scope of this talk… • Provenance – The record of the origin or source of data – The history of the ownership or location of data – Purpose: to confirm the time and place of, and perhaps the person responsible for, the creation, production or discovery of the data • Curation – Collecting, cataloging, organizing, and preserving data • Ontology – Assigning t ypes and pro perties to data ob jects – Determining relationships among data objects – Associating concepts and meanings with data (semantics) •Portab le data fo rmats can an d do addr ess som e of th ese i ssues… 10/27/2008 www.cac.cornell.edu 3 Portable data formats: the HDF5 technology suite • Versatile data model that
    [Show full text]
  • Tutorial Session Agenda
    CFD General Notation System (CGNS) Tutorial Session Agenda • 7:00-7:30 Introduction, overview, and basic usage C. Rumsey (NASA Langley) • 7:30-7:50 Usage for structured grids B. Wedan (ANSYS – ICEM) • 7:50-8:10 Usage for unstructured grids E. van der Weide (Stanford University) • 8:20-8:40 HDF5 usage and parallel implementation T. Hauser (Utah State University) • 8:40-9:00 Python and in-memory CGNS trees M. Poinot (ONERA) • 9:00-9:30 Discussion and question/answer period 2 CFD General Notation System (CGNS) Introduction, overview, and basic usage Christopher L. Rumsey NASA Langley Research Center Chair, CGNS Steering Committee Outline • Introduction • Overview of CGNS – What it is – History – How it works, and how it can help – The future • Basic usage – Getting it and making it work for you – Simple example – Aspects for data longevity 4 Introduction • CGNS provides a general, portable, and extensible standard for the storage and retrieval of CFD analysis data • Principal target is data normally associated with computed solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations & its derivatives • But applicable to computational field physics in general (with augmentation of data definitions and storage conventions) 5 What is CGNS? • Standard for defining & storing CFD data – Self-descriptive – Machine-independent – Very general and extendable – Administered by international steering committee • AIAA recommended practice (AIAA R-101-2002) • In process of becoming part of international ISO standard • Free and open software • Well-documented • Discussion
    [Show full text]
  • Codesaturne Installation Guide
    EDF R&D Fluid Dynamics, Power Generation and Environment Department Single Phase Thermal-Hydraulics Group 6, quai Watier F-78401 Chatou Cedex Tel: 33 1 30 87 75 40 Fax: 33 1 30 87 79 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 Code Saturne documentation Code Saturne version 6.0.0 installation guide contact: [email protected] http://code-saturne.org/ c EDF 2019 Code Saturne EDF R&D Code Saturne version 6.0.0 installation guide documentation Page 1/21 Code Saturne EDF R&D Code Saturne version 6.0.0 installation guide documentation Page 2/21 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Code Saturne Automated or manual installation.................. 3 2 Installation basics................................... 3 3 Compilers and interpreters.............................. 3 4 Loading an environment............................... 4 5 Third-Party libraries................................. 4 5.1 Installing third-party libraries for Code Saturne ................ 4 5.2 List of third-party libraries usable by Code Saturne .............. 5 5.3 Notes on some third-party tools and libraries................. 7 5.3.1 Python and PyQt............................... 7 5.3.2 Scotch and PT-Scotch............................ 7 5.3.3 MED....................................... 8 5.3.4 libCCMIO.................................... 8 5.3.5 freesteam.................................... 9 5.3.6 CoolProp.................................... 9 5.3.7 Paraview or Catalyst............................ 10 6 Preparing for build.................................. 11 6.1 Source trees obtained through a source code repository.......... 11 7 Configuration...................................... 11 7.1 Debug builds...................................... 12 7.2 Shared or static builds............................... 12 7.3 Relocatable builds.................................. 12 7.4 Compiler flags and environment variables................... 13 7.5 MPI compiler wrappers............................... 13 7.6 Environment Modules................................ 13 7.7 Remarks for very large meshes.........................
    [Show full text]