DOCSLIB.ORG

Calpers 2011 Annual Investment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annual Investment Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011 California Public Employees’ Retirement System A Component Unit of the State of California 10 / 11 Summary of Investments as of June 30, 2011 Introduction Alternative Investment Management Chief Investment Officer’s Letter Program Corporate Restructuring Cash Equivalents Distressed Securities Domestic Cash Equivalents Expansion Capital International Currency Mezzanine Debt Debt Securities Secondary Interest Asset-Backed Special Situation Corporate Venture Capital Sovereign Bonds Inflationary-Linked Assets U.S. Treasuries & Agencies Inflationary-Linked Assets Mortgage Loans Derivatives Real Estate Programs Mortgage-Backed Securities Domestic Real Estate International Debt Securities Domestic REITS International Derivatives International Real Estate Equity Domestic Equity & Options International Equity & Options Chief Investment Officer’s Letter June 30, 2011 The Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System On behalf of CalPERS Investment Office, I am also will have an international growth and income pleased to report on CalPERS investment performance, sector in emerging markets. operations, and initiatives for the one-year period ending We successfully completed several important on June 30, 2011. The CalPERS Fund earned a net initiatives. During this past fiscal year, the CalPERS 21.7 percent return this fiscal year, with the market value Board adopted a new risk-based asset allocation of the Fund climbing to $239.3 billion. The returns mark structure that positions us to better manage the Fund the strongest annual performance in 14 years for the in varying market conditions. The strategy focuses on Fund and the second straight fiscal year we’ve exceeded such key drivers of risk and return as economic growth, our long-term annualized earnings target of 7.75 percent. inflation, liquidity and interest rates. CalPERS staff We have averaged a net return on investments of will use the new risk-based allocation structure as 8.4 percent over the past 20 years. they review asset allocation decisions and evaluate Our total Global Equity portfolio increased investment opportunities. 30.2 percent, exceeding its benchmark by 9 basis points. The Investment Office cut operational costs over Global Fixed Income grew by 7 percent, beating its the past year by more than $350 million, led by reductions benchmark by 1.4 percentage points, and the Alternative in management fees charged by investment partners and Investment Management Program (private equity) managers. And our Corporate Governance program surpassed its benchmark by nearly 5 percentage points helped develop and launch the Diverse Director with a 25.3 percent return. Commodities, infrastructure, DataSource, a new resource that shareowners, companies forestland, and inflation-linked bonds grew a combined and other organizations can use to recruit individuals 13.6 percent in the fiscal year, exceeding its benchmark whose experience, skills and knowledge qualify them by 6 percentage points. to be a candidate for a board director’s seat. The determined effort by our real estate staff to Finally, we continue to invest in our home state restructure the portfolio following the financial downturn of California. At the close of the fiscal year, we had had a strong impact, with real estate gaining 10.2 percent approximately $23.5 billion invested or committed in the fiscal year as valuations continued to stabilize. to businesses here. The CalPERS Board adopted a new strategy for real Our Investment Office staff, pension consultant estate in February 2011 that focuses primarily on core, Wilshire Associates, and State Street Bank & Trust, income-generating properties. The plan calls for investing our master custodian, compiled the investment data at least 75 percent of the portfolio mainly in retail, office, presented on the next pages as required by the Public industrial and multi-family housing properties in the Employees’ Retirement Law. We remain committed to United States over the next several years. Most new provide our members, beneficiaries and employers with commitments will go to long-term partners managing superior risk-adjusted returns to support their long-term exclusive CalPERS real estate accounts. The portfolio financial needs. Joseph A. Dear Chief Investment Officer CalPERS 2010-2011 Annual Investment Report Domestic Cash Equivalents Security Name Rate Maturity Date Par Value Book Value Market Value Yield AMERICAN WATER CAPIT 1.00 07/01/2011 35,000,000 $ 35,000,000 $ 35,000,000 1.00 AMERICAN WATER CAPIT 1.00 07/05/2011 20,000,000 19,999,267 19,999,267 1.00 AMERICAN WATER CAPIT 0.00 07/07/2011 35,000,000 34,998,133 34,998,133 0.00 BMW US CAPITAL LLC 0.00 07/01/2011 52,000,000 52,000,000 52,000,000 0.00 BMW US CAPITAL LLC 1.00 07/06/2011 5,100,000 5,099,780 5,099,780 1.00 BMW US CAPITAL LLC 1.00 07/07/2011 20,000,000 19,998,967 19,998,967 1.00 BMW US CAPITAL LLC 1.00 07/08/2011 13,525,000 13,524,211 13,524,211 1.00 CASH COLLATERAL BARCLAYS BANK 0.07 12/31/1949 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 0.07 COLLATERAL CREDIT SUISSE 0.07 12/31/1949 16,400,000 16,400,000 16,400,000 0.07 COLLATERAL SOCIETE GENERALE 0.07 12/31/1949 35,650,000 35,650,000 35,650,000 0.07 COLLATERAL UBS AG 0.07 12/31/1949 6,550,000 6,550,000 6,550,000 0.07 COLLATERL JP MORGAN CHASE 0.07 12/31/1949 39,800,000 39,800,000 39,800,000 0.07 DEVON ENERGY CORP 0.00 07/01/2011 21,000,000 21,000,000 21,000,000 0.00 DOMINION RESOURCES 1.00 07/05/2011 20,000,000 19,999,289 19,999,289 1.00 ENBRIDGE ENERGY PRTNS 1.00 07/01/2011 17,840,000 17,840,000 17,840,000 1.00 ENBRIDGE ENERGY PRTNS 1.00 07/06/2011 25,000,000 24,998,924 24,998,924 1.00 ENBRIDGE ENERGY PRTNS 1.00 07/07/2011 16,750,000 16,749,100 16,749,100 1.00 GOLDMAN FUTURES CASH 1.00 12/31/1930 1,000 1,000 1,000 1.00 GREENWICH REPO 0.03 07/01/2011 65,900,000 65,900,000 65,900,000 0.03 KANSAS CITY PWR & LT 0.00 07/01/2011 50,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,000 0.00 KANSAS CITY PWR & LT 0.00 07/07/2011 10,000,000 9,999,483 9,999,483 0.00 KANSAS CITY PWR & LT 0.34 07/14/2011 30,000,000 29,996,317 29,996,317 0.34 MORGAN STANLEY REPO 0.04 07/05/2011 66,500,000 66,500,000 66,500,000 0.04 PACIFIC GAS & ELEC CO 1.00 07/01/2011 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 1.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELEC CO 1.00 07/06/2011 31,000,000 30,998,493 30,998,493 1.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELEC CO 0.34 07/11/2011 3,700,000 3,699,651 3,699,651 0.34 PACIFIC GAS & ELEC CO 1.00 07/11/2011 10,000,000 9,999,083 9,999,083 1.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELEC CO 1.00 07/12/2011 5,000,000 4,999,465 4,999,465 1.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELEC CO 0.34 07/14/2011 11,000,000 10,998,649 10,998,649 0.34 PROGRESS ENERGY INC 0.00 07/01/2011 49,200,000 49,200,000 49,200,000 0.00 PUB.SERV.CO.COLORADO 0.30 07/05/2011 10,000,000 9,999,667 9,999,667 0.30 PUB.SERV.CO.COLORADO 0.30 07/14/2011 5,000,000 4,999,440 4,999,440 0.30 PUBLIC SER ELEC & GA 1.00 07/11/2011 5,800,000 5,799,501 5,799,501 1.00 PUBLIC SER ELEC & GA 1.00 07/12/2011 20,000,000 19,998,167 19,998,167 1.00 PUBLIC SER ELEC & GA 1.00 07/14/2011 4,700,000 4,699,474 4,699,474 1.00 SAFEWAY INC 1.00 07/06/2011 15,000,000 14,999,313 14,999,313 1.00 SAFEWAY INC 1.00 07/15/2011 15,000,000 14,998,075 14,998,075 1.00 SAFEWAY INC 0.32 07/20/2011 15,000,000 14,997,388 14,997,388 0.32 SEMPRA ENERGY HOLDIN 0.00 07/01/2011 16,420,000 16,420,000 16,420,000 0.00 SEMPRA ENERGY HOLDIN 1.00 07/06/2011 10,000,000 9,999,556 9,999,556 1.00 SEMPRA ENERGY HOLDIN 1.00 07/13/2011 30,000,000 29,996,800 29,996,800 1.00 SMIF/PERS 5.05 12/31/1930 1,245,535,000 1,245,535,000 1,245,535,000 5.05 SOUTHERN PWR CO 0.30 07/11/2011 8,500,000 8,499,292 8,499,292 0.30 SPECTRA ENERGY CAPTL 0.29 07/01/2011 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 0.29 SPECTRA ENERGY CAPTL 0.31 07/05/2011 7,800,000 7,799,731 7,799,731 0.31 SPECTRA ENERGY CAPTL 1.00 07/05/2011 24,800,000 24,799,118 24,799,118 1.00 SPECTRA ENERGY CAPTL 1.00 07/06/2011 8,000,000 7,999,656 7,999,656 1.00 SPECTRA ENERGY CAPTL 1.00 07/11/2011 14,000,000 13,998,794 13,998,794 1.00 STIF CALPERS 0.19 12/31/2020 5,443,700,385 5,443,700,385 5,443,700,385 0.19 TREASURY BILL 0.02 08/25/2011 313,000 312,986 312,986 0.02 TREASURY BILL 0.18 08/11/2011 1,431,000 1,430,776 1,430,776 0.18 TREASURY BILL 0.16 09/01/2011 40,000 39,997 39,997 0.16 TREASURY BILL 0.14 09/08/2011 121,000 120,970 120,970 0.14 TREASURY BILL 0.05 09/15/2011 1,789,000 1,788,728 1,788,728 0.05 TREASURY BILL 0.30 07/28/2011 276,000 275,967 275,967 0.30 WI TREASURY SEC 0.18 08/18/2011 53,000 52,997 52,997 0.18 XCEL ENERGY INC 1.00 07/21/2011 5,100,000 5,099,122 5,099,122 1.00 Grand Total $ 7,653,260,710 $ 7,653,260,710 CalPERS 2010-2011 Annual Investment Report International Currency Security Name Par Value Book Value Market Value AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR 2,900,203 $ 3,088,144 $ 3,104,957 BRAZILIAN REAL 20,774,007 12,574,090 13,297,492 CANADIAN DOLLAR 19,053,281 19,629,102 19,742,286 CHILEAN PESO 260,775,478 552,596 556,558 COLOMBIAN PESO 9,871,036 5,516 5,568 CZECH KORUNA 8,025,187 456,451 478,181 DANISH KRONE 1,262,565 238,431 245,416 EGYPTIAN POUND 1,137,667 190,820 190,612 EURO CURRENCY 339,415,925 489,842,400 492,101,839 HONG KONG DOLLAR 25,856,454 3,321,725 3,322,918 HUNGARIAN FORINT 15,320,559 82,827 83,658 INDIAN RUPEE 245,916,353 5,485,345 5,501,177 INDONESIAN RUPIAH 13,270,515,149 1,544,371 1,547,492 ISRAELI SHEKEL 5,656,166 1,635,049 1,662,356 JAPANESE YEN 2,479,004,364 30,653,233 30,695,943 MALAYSIAN RINGGIT 2,385,338 784,323 789,978 MEXICAN PESO (NEW) 19,693,125 1,695,124 1,679,312 MOROCCAN DIRHAM 252,900 31,685 32,311 NEW TAIWAN DOLLAR
Recommended publications
  • Hospitals Hungry Under Health Reform

    Hospitals Hungry Under Health Reform

    20120924-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CD_-- 9/21/2012 6:41 PM Page 1 ® www.crainsdetroit.com Vol. 28, No. 40 SEPTEMBER 24 – 30, 2012 $2 a copy; $59 a year ©Entire contents copyright 2012 by Crain Communications Inc. All rights reserved Page 3 Bills aim to African violence Hospitals hungry under touches auto supply chain flow funds health to sewer Electronics retailer unplugs Michigan search reform projects Inside New loan, grant Tom Henderson on how Systems prowl not to save Belle Isle, for acquisitions programs sought Page 4 BY CHAD HALCOM BY AMY LANE Crain’s Lists CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS SPECIAL TO CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS The need for efficiency under Communities may get some help Largest IT companies, health care reform may be lead- JEFF JOHNSTON/CDB from Lansing in managing and im- ing to a wave of consolidation and proving one of the most critical largest architectural firms, the possible entry of more for- people covered by Medicaid and and costly pieces of their infra- Pages 18, 19 profit health care companies into those newly insured in 2014. structure — their aging sewer sys- Michigan. Other changes under reform in- tems. Crain’s reported Sept. 16 that clude hospitals working with On the move in the Legislature This Just In Beaumont Health System has been physicians and other providers to are bills that would take about $654 approached by for-profits Van- contract as accountable care or- million remaining from a $1 billion ganizations. ACOs have the po- environmental bond passed by vot- 2 area defense contractors guard Health Systems Inc.
  • OSB Representative Participant List by Industry

    OSB Representative Participant List by Industry

    OSB Representative Participant List by Industry Aerospace • KAWASAKI • VOLVO • CATERPILLAR • ADVANCED COATING • KEDDEG COMPANY • XI'AN AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY • CHINA FAW GROUP TECHNOLOGIES GROUP • KOREAN AIRLINES • CHINA INTERNATIONAL Agriculture • AIRBUS MARINE CONTAINERS • L3 COMMUNICATIONS • AIRCELLE • AGRICOLA FORNACE • CHRYSLER • LOCKHEED MARTIN • ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS • CARGILL • COMMERCIAL VEHICLE • M7 AEROSPACE GROUP • AVICHINA • E. RITTER & COMPANY • • MESSIER-BUGATTI- CONTINENTAL AIRLINES • BAE SYSTEMS • EXOPLAST DOWTY • CONTINENTAL • BE AEROSPACE • MITSUBISHI HEAVY • JOHN DEERE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES • • BELL HELICOPTER • MAUI PINEAPPLE CONTINENTAL • NASA COMPANY AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS • BOMBARDIER • • NGC INTEGRATED • USDA COOPER-STANDARD • CAE SYSTEMS AUTOMOTIVE Automotive • • CORNING • CESSNA AIRCRAFT NORTHROP GRUMMAN • AGCO • COMPANY • PRECISION CASTPARTS COSMA INDUSTRIAL DO • COBHAM CORP. • ALLIED SPECIALTY BRASIL • VEHICLES • CRP INDUSTRIES • COMAC RAYTHEON • AMSTED INDUSTRIES • • CUMMINS • DANAHER RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS • ANHUI JIANGHUAI • • DAF TRUCKS • DASSAULT AVIATION RAYTHEON MISSLE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEMS COMPANY • • ARVINMERITOR DAIHATSU MOTOR • EATON • RAYTHEON NCS • • ASHOK LEYLAND DAIMLER • EMBRAER • RAYTHEON RMS • • ATC LOGISTICS & DALPHI METAL ESPANA • EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC • ROLLS-ROYCE DEFENCE AND SPACE ELECTRONICS • DANA HOLDING COMPANY • ROTORCRAFT • AUDI CORPORATION • FINMECCANICA ENTERPRISES • • AUTOZONE DANA INDÚSTRIAS • SAAB • FLIR SYSTEMS • • BAE SYSTEMS DELPHI • SMITH'S DETECTION • FUJI • • BECK/ARNLEY DENSO CORPORATION
  • Internet Economy 25 Years After .Com

    Internet Economy 25 Years After .Com

    THE INTERNET ECONOMY 25 YEARS AFTER .COM TRANSFORMING COMMERCE & LIFE March 2010 25Robert D. Atkinson, Stephen J. Ezell, Scott M. Andes, Daniel D. Castro, and Richard Bennett THE INTERNET ECONOMY 25 YEARS AFTER .COM TRANSFORMING COMMERCE & LIFE March 2010 Robert D. Atkinson, Stephen J. Ezell, Scott M. Andes, Daniel D. Castro, and Richard Bennett The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation I Ac KNOW L EDGEMEN T S The authors would like to thank the following individuals for providing input to the report: Monique Martineau, Lisa Mendelow, and Stephen Norton. Any errors or omissions are the authors’ alone. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Robert D. Atkinson is President of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Stephen J. Ezell is a Senior Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Scott M. Andes is a Research Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Daniel D. Castro is a Senior Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Richard Bennett is a Research Fellow at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. ABOUT THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is a Washington, DC-based think tank at the cutting edge of designing innovation policies and exploring how advances in technology will create new economic opportunities to improve the quality of life. Non-profit, and non-partisan, we offer pragmatic ideas that break free of economic philosophies born in eras long before the first punch card computer and well before the rise of modern China and pervasive globalization. ITIF, founded in 2006, is dedicated to conceiving and promoting the new ways of thinking about technology-driven productivity, competitiveness, and globalization that the 21st century demands.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 75/Monday, April 20, 1998/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 75/Monday, April 20, 1998/Notices

    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 75 / Monday, April 20, 1998 / Notices 19495 advice, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(9) of FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 7A(b)(2) of the Act permits the agencies, Regulation Y. in individual cases, to terminate this Granting of Request for Early Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve waiting period prior to its expiration Termination of the Waiting Period System, April 15, 1998. and requires that notice of this action be under the Premerger Notification Rules published in the Federal Register. Jennifer J. Johnson, The following transactions were Deputy Secretary of the Board. Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 granted early termination of the waiting [FR Doc. 98±10367 Filed 4±17±98; 8:45 am] U.S.C. 18a, as added by Title II of the period provided by law and the BILLING CODE 6210±01±F Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust premerger notification rules. The grants Improvements Act of 1976, requires were made by the Federal Trade persons contemplating certain mergers Commission and the Assistant Attorney or acquisitions to give the Federal Trade General for the Antitrust Division of the Commission and the Assistant Attorney Department of Justice. Neither agency General advance notice and to wait intends to take any action with respect designated periods before to these proposed acquisitions during consummation of such plans. Section the applicable waiting period. TRANSACTION GRANTED EARLY TERMINATION ET date Trans. No. ET req status Party name 30±MAR±98 ........................ 19981991 G Mr. Francois Pinault. G Brylane Inc. G Brylane Inc. 19982054 G Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. G Jay L.
  • Kandi Technologies Group, Inc

    Kandi Technologies Group, Inc

    Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. Investor Presentation March 2016 NASDAQ GS: KNDI www.KandiTechnologiesGroup.com 2 SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT Except for historical information contained herein, the statements made in the presentation of Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (the “Company”) are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, product demand, market competition, and government policies. These and other risks are described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these risk factors. These forward-looking statements speak as of the date hereof. Other than as required under the securities laws, the Company does not assume a duty to update these forward-looking statements. 2 Kandi Introduction 4 Kandi at a Glance o Founded in 2002 o NASDAQ GS: KNDI (listed since March 2008) o Stock Price: $8.56* o Market Cap: $402.5M (47,019,638* outstanding shares) o Three-month Average Daily Volume: 575,228 Shares* o Headquarters: Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China o Three full-scale production facilities in Shanghai, Jinhua, and Changxing o Facility in Jiangsu Rugao, ready for product sales in 2Q16 o Facility in Haikou, under construction 4 * As of March 15, 2016 5 Business Overview Leading pure EV products 50/50 Joint Venture with provider in China.
  • Assessing Responses to Increased Provider Consolidation in Three Markets: Detroit, Syracuse, and Northern Virginia

    Assessing Responses to Increased Provider Consolidation in Three Markets: Detroit, Syracuse, and Northern Virginia

    Assessing Responses to Increased Provider Consolidation in Three Markets: Detroit, Syracuse, and Northern Virginia By Sabrina Corlette, Jack Hoadley, Katie Keith, and Olivia Hoppe November 2018 Table of Contents Introduction and Approach . 1 Conclusion . 4. Case Study: Detroit . 5 . Case Study: Syracuse . 10. Case Study: Northern Virginia . 16 . Acknowledgments . .22 . Assessing Responses to Increased Provider Consolidation Introduction and Approach Rising health care prices have increased concerns Insurers—under pressure from employer purchasers and about hospital and health system consolidation policymakers to keep costs affordable while maintaining among policymakers, regulators, employers, and other health care quality—are thus exploring a range of strategies purchasers of health coverage . Although merging to counter provider consolidation in their markets . The ability hospitals and health systems claim they can achieve to implement and successfully deploy these strategies can greater efficiencies through their consolidation, the vary significantly, depending on the market in which insurers economic literature almost universally finds that hospitals are operating . that merge have prices above those of surrounding In a series of six market-level, qualitative case studies, hospitals .1 More broadly, markets with increased levels we assess the impact of recent provider consolidations of provider concentration, regardless of the reason, tend and overall provider concentration, the ability of market to see higher prices .2 Indeed, increases in hospital prices participants (and, where relevant, regulators) to respond have been a key factor driving the growth of commercial to those consolidations, and effective strategies for health insurance costs over the past decade .3 constraining cost growth while maintaining clinical quality . As prices have risen, employers have shifted an ever Our case studies focus on the commercial insurance greater share of the costs to employees .
  • China Equity Strategy

    China Equity Strategy

    June 5, 2019 09:40 AM GMT MORGAN STANLEY ASIA LIMITED+ China Equity Strategy | Asia Pacific Jonathan F Garner EQUITY STRATEGIST [email protected] +852 2848-7288 The Rubio "Equitable Act" - Our Laura Wang EQUITY STRATEGIST [email protected] +852 2848-6853 First Thoughts Corey Ng, CFA EQUITY STRATEGIST [email protected] +852 2848-5523 Fran Chen, CFA A new bill sponsored by US Senator Marco Rubio has the EQUITY STRATEGIST potential to cause significant change in the listing domains of [email protected] +852 2848-7135 Chinese firms. After the market close in the US yesterday 4th June the Wall Street Journal published an Op-Ed by US Senator Marco Rubio in which he announced that he intends to sponsor the “Equitable Act” – an acronym for Ensuring Quality Information and Transparency for Abroad-Based Listings on our Exchanges. At this time the text of the bill has not been published and we are seeking additional information about its contents and likelihood of passing. However, our early reaction is that this has the potential to cause significant changes in the domain for listings of Chinese firms going forward with the potential for de- listing of Chinese firms on US exchanges and re-listing elsewhere (most likely Hong Kong). More generally we see this development as part of an increased escalation of tensions between China and the US on multiple fronts which should cap the valuation multiple for China equities, in particular in the offshore index constituents and US-listed parts of the universe. We provide a list of the potentially impacted China / HK names with either primary or secondary listings on Amex, NYSE or Nasdaq.
  • A Discussion on Financial Market Turmoil

    A Discussion on Financial Market Turmoil

    A Discussion on Financial Market Turmoil Richard Anderson Aston University November 12, 2008 Disclaimer: The views expressed are mine and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Outline 1.Picture of “where we are” 2.How did we get here? 3.Mortgage Finance and financial engineering 4.Time line of events 5.Federal Reserve actions 6.Economic Outlook Financial Market Deterioration Win? Source: Denver Post, 7 November 2008 Definitions • Credit Crunch – Curtailment of credit supply in response to decline in value of bank capital. • Credit Squeeze – Shortage of liquidity in money markets and effective closure of certain capital markets affecting credit availability between banks. – Decline in terms and availability of credit for consumers and entrepreneurs. Credit Squeeze • Disorder in financial markets as banks seek to determine true value of assets not being actively traded. • Uncertainty among financial institutions aware of the need for liquidity but unwilling to offer it except under terms well above the risk-free rate. Past Examples? • Emerging markets crisis 1997-98 • LTCM 1998 • Dot-com boom-and-bust 2000 • International mortgage finance – International investors – Mortgage instruments packaged and re- packaged, sold and re-sold Current Crisis • Started with subprime mortgages • Escalated due to derivatives • Cascaded due to credit insurance (CDS) – CDS affected many types of loans and investments – Crisis of confidence • Affected both the regulated and unregulated banking systems Consequences • Loss of confidence – Inability to assess counterparty risk – Inability to borrow leads to reduced spending and lending – Term funding unavailable in interbank lending market – Withdrawals from money market funds disrupt commercial paper market (shadow banking system) • Affect economies worldwide Two Inviolate Rules of Investing 1.
  • Kndi) and Its Growth Opportunities: Smaller City Ride Sharing Platform and Fleet Sales

    Kndi) and Its Growth Opportunities: Smaller City Ride Sharing Platform and Fleet Sales

    ALPHADIRECT MANAGEMENT SERIES MAY 28, 2020 IN FOCUS: KANDI TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (NASDAQ GS: KNDI) AND ITS GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES: SMALLER CITY RIDE SHARING PLATFORM AND FLEET SALES KNDI Business Snapshot This report focuses on Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (NASDAQ GS: KNDI) and targeted high growth areas including ride sharing Founded: 2007 and the opportunity and drivers of this market. Headquarters: Jinhua China Ticker: KNDI (NASDAQ) Stock Price: $3.09 Market Cap: $167.533M Website: http://en.kandivehicle.com/ *As of May 27, 2020. All prices in USD. Source: Kandi Model K23 http://en.kandivehicle.com/ About alphaDIRECT THE ALPHADIRECT INSIGHT Kandi Technologies positions itself as one of the pioneers of the EV alphaDIRECT Advisors is a Publishing and Investor Intelligence firm that creates and industry in China. Kandi introduced its first EV in 2007 and now implements digital content and programs produces EVs through a joint venture with Geely, China’s largest and to help investors better understand a company’s key drivers including industry fastest growing non-state-owned automaker. The company is also dynamics, technology, strategy, outlook leveraging its business model to other high growth areas including ride and risks as well as the impact they could sharing. The company expects that the ride sharing market in China is have on the stock price. alphaDIRECT’s expertise encompasses a variety of poised for significant growth in the coming years with China already sectors including Clean Transportation, being home to the world’s largest ride-hailing market, estimated by Emerging EnergyTech, Energy Services, consulting firm Bain & Co to be worth $23 billion.
  • List of Section 13F Securities

    List of Section 13F Securities

    List of Section 13F Securities 1st Quarter FY 2004 Copyright (c) 2004 American Bankers Association. CUSIP Numbers and descriptions are used with permission by Standard & Poors CUSIP Service Bureau, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No redistribution without permission from Standard & Poors CUSIP Service Bureau. Standard & Poors CUSIP Service Bureau does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the CUSIP Numbers and standard descriptions included herein and neither the American Bankers Association nor Standard & Poor's CUSIP Service Bureau shall be responsible for any errors, omissions or damages arising out of the use of such information. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission OFFICIAL LIST OF SECTION 13(f) SECURITIES USER INFORMATION SHEET General This list of “Section 13(f) securities” as defined by Rule 13f-1(c) [17 CFR 240.13f-1(c)] is made available to the public pursuant to Section13 (f) (3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 USC 78m(f) (3)]. It is made available for use in the preparation of reports filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission pursuant to Rule 13f-1 [17 CFR 240.13f-1] under Section 13(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. An updated list is published on a quarterly basis. This list is current as of March 15, 2004, and may be relied on by institutional investment managers filing Form 13F reports for the calendar quarter ending March 31, 2004. Institutional investment managers should report holdings--number of shares and fair market value--as of the last day of the calendar quarter as required by Section 13(f)(1) and Rule 13f-1 thereunder.
  • Annual Report 2013 QUALITY GEEL

    Annual Report 2013 QUALITY GEEL

    Geely Automobile Holdings Limited Holdings Geely Automobile (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) (Stock Code : 0175) QUALITY GEELY Annual Report 2013 Annual Report 2013 Room 2301, 23rd Floor, Great Eagle Centre, 23 Harbour Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong 香港灣仔港灣道 23 號鷹君中心 23 樓 2301 室 CONTENTS Key Figures Five Year Financial Summary 003 Editorial Chairman’s Statement 005 Management Report Performance & Governance 009 Directors and Senior Management Profiles 021 Corporate Governance Report 027 Directors’ Report 050 Accounts Independent Auditors’ Report 069 Consolidated Income Statement 071 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 072 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 073 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 075 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 077 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 079 Our Company Directory 171 GEELY AUTOMOBILE HOLDINGS LIMITED FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY Annual Report 2014 KEY FIGURES Five Year Financial Summary 002 KEY FIGURES Profit attributable to equity Turnover Equity attributable to equity holders of the Company (RMB Billion) holders of the Company (RMB Million) (RMB Billion) 3,000 30 20 2,500 24 15 2,000 1,500 18 10 1,000 6 5 500 0 0 0 09 10 11 12 13 09 10 11 12 13 09 10 11 12 13 GEELY AUTOMOBILE HOLDINGS LIMITED FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY Annual Report 2013 KEY FIGURES Five Year Financial Summary 003 A summary of the results and the assets and liabilities of the Group for the last five financial years, as extracted from the audited financial statements, is
  • Itdothealth II the Meeting at Harvard on a Health Information Technology Platform

    Itdothealth II the Meeting at Harvard on a Health Information Technology Platform

    ITdotHealth II The Meeting at Harvard on a Health Information Technology Platform SEPTEMBER 10-11, 2012 COUNTWAY LIBRARY OF MEDICINE MINOT ROOM, 5TH FLOOR 10 SHATTUCK ST. BOSTON, MA 02115 S: Agenda Monday, September 10, 2012 11:00am Lunch, Networking Ballard/Lahey Rooms 1:00pm Introduction Minot Room Kenneth Mandl Director, Intelligent Health Lab, Boston Children’s Hospital Infor- matics Program; Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School 1:15pm Making EHR Apps Substitutable: Theory & Experience Minot Room Joshua Mandel Lead Architect, SMART Platforms; Research Faculty, Boston Chil- dren’s Hospital Informatics Program; Instructor, Harvard Medical School 1:45pm Apps & APIs: Innovating With and Around Vendor and Homegrown EHRs Minot Room Moderator: Brian Athey Chair, University of Michigan Medical School, Depart- ment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics; Professor, UM Med- ical School Howard Goldberg Senior Corporate Manager, Partners Health Care; Lecturer, Har- vard Medical School John Halamka Chief Information Officer, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Co-Chair, National Health IT Standards Committee; Professor, Harvard Medical School John Hutton Director of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital; Professor, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine John Mattison Chief Medical Information Officer, Kaiser Permanente 3:00pm Keynote Address: “Data, Predictions, and Decisions: On Computational Futures Minot room for Evidence-Based Healthcare” Eric Horvitz Distinguished Scientist & Deputy Managing Director,