arXiv:quant-ph/0504183v1 25 Apr 2005 † ∗ elsae 1,1,1] oee,i h rcs fmea- is of above The process the vandalized. is in state However, entangled 17]. the four surement 16, the [15, all disentan- states identify into unambiguously Bell mea- can states and states, Bell basis transforms the gled discrimination unitary transfer state Appropriate which unambiguous surements, 16]. of 15, area [14, this already in [13]. results experimental impossible exist and is theoretical measurement of number Bell A failing never a that states Bell three LOCC any only is allowed. that, if copy is deterministically, known single discriminated also a be is only cannot if It states, Bell provided. not four is prob- the It or certainty. deterministically abilistically LOCC either with provided, discriminate, them to are distinguish possible to states used belonging Bell be copies orthogonal can two four If the [11]. to dis- LOCC unequivocally through be tinguished can two states any orthogonal However, and multipartite operations counter [9]. states local (LOCC) is only orthogonal communications It with classical multipartite discriminated 12]. be that, not 11, may know 10, [9, to have states intuitive vari- results Bell distinguishing of orthogonal regarding number ous established A been [8]. dis- recently to certainty impossible with are criminate states Nonorthogonal disturbing states. without these operations, in cryptographic present compu- quantum is and of that tation inter- stages state various of at entangled be network, of quantum may type a It the [1]. know network to entan- quantum est various a in produce states can gled one gates, em- Controlled-NOT be to beginning 7]. are [6, states purposes entangled various W for particle and ployed three GHZ although like aspects, states these illustra- transparent of most en- tion the maximally provide bipartite, states The Bell as tangled [5]. known the coding channel, in dense information increase quantum quantum to en- the leads two of Entanglement capacity on [4]. measurement pairs joint entangle- tangled achieve through can swapping one ment communication; measurement classical [3] appropriate teleported and operations, be unitary en- can local Using state with unknown 2]. an [1, channel, information tangled quantum of processing and lcrncades [email protected] address: Electronic lcrncades er˙[email protected] address: Electronic aigueo nylna lmns thsbe shown been has it elements, linear only of use Making the and operations qubit single of use Making transmission the in role key a play states Entangled elsae,wtotaetn h unu hne containi channel quantum the affecting without states, Bell emk s flcloeain ihtoaclabt odeter to bits ancilla two with operations local of use make We 2 hsclRsac aoaoy arnpr,Amdbd 38 Ahmedabad, Navrangpura, Laboratory, Research Physical 1 apeIsiueo nomto ehooy od,21307 201 Noida, Technology, Information of Institute Jaypee eemnsi elSaeDiscrimination State Bell Deterministic auGupta Manu 1 ∗ n rsnaK Panigrahi K. Prasanta and il is hrfr eaeal opeev h elstates Bell the an- preserve operations. two to further the able for are on we out operations. therefore carried unitary bits, are cilla local measurements end employ the only At the will Throughout we channels. ancilla in- entangled two protocol, is of the use alone with make along LOCC will bits, As we purpose, use. this further for sufficient pre- for to states able is these and serve deterministically states Bell four the all further required network. not quantum is the state in Bell the where satisfactory, discrim state Bell for circuit the nator. depicting Diagram 1: FIG. h elsaedsrmnto,a hw nFg1 tcon- It as for Fig.1. depicted circuit in channels, quantum shown a two as designed of sists have discrimination, we state Bell states, the Bell above the the Exploiting proves of states them. nature Bell distinguishing of in property to handy This very state Bell demand. one on other transform interest- as the easily an can is such which This property other. operators ing combina- each in into qubit transformed or get solitude single tion, in matrices, by Pauli and on Hadamard operated when eto h rtaclawl ieetaetefu Bell four the Measure- differentiate channel. will the ancilla the in first certainty, exists the with that on know state is ment to measurement Bell bits end, of ancilla the type car- these In for on used operations. taken are local qubits out ancilla rying two state; entangled the tsol entdta,teBl states: Bell the that, noted be should It discriminates which scheme a letter, this in present We gteeBl states. Bell these ng iitclydsigihaltefour the all distinguish ministically | | | | ψ ψ φ φ − + + − i i i i 2 = = = = † 0,India 009, 0 √ √ √ √ 1 1 1 1 India , 2 2 2 2 ( ( ( ( | | | | 01 00 00 01 i | − i i | − i + + | | 11 10 11 10 i i i i ) ) ) ) , , , , | x 12 i carrying , (1) i- 2

+ + − − states into two pairs i.e., either ψ / φ or ψ / φ [I2 I2 H] [ x12 A1 ] and (2) | i | i | i | i ⊗ ⊗ ∗ | i ⊗ | i as given in Eq.2. While the measurement on the sec- ⊗3 RA2 = [H ] [(x1 A2) (x1 A2) I2] ond ancilla differentiates the Bell states within these two | i ∗ ⊕ ⊗ ⊕ ⊗ ∗ ⊗3 groups as stated in Eq.3. The remarkable property of [H ] [ x12 A2 ]. (3) ∗ | i ⊗ | i this circuit is that, the Bell states in first two quantum channels retain their initial states, even after being dis- Table. I: criminated. Here, we have used Hadamard operation on the entangled channel while differentiating the Bell states Bell State Measurement A1 Measurement A2 in Eqs.2 and 3, though one can also use other suitable sin- ψ+ 0 0 gle qubit operations. In table-I we have shown the results | i ψ− 1 0 of the measurements on both the ancillas when different | i φ+ 0 1 Bell states are present in the given circuit (Fig.1). Before | i measurement the states can be explicitly written as, φ− 1 1 | i We acknowledge useful discussions with Prof. J. Pasu- RA1 = [I2 I2 H] [(x1 A1) (x2 A1) I2] pathy, S. Dasgupta, J.N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Biswas. | i ⊗ ⊗ ∗ ⊕ ⊗ ⊕ ⊗ ∗

[1] Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L. Quantum Computation [10] Gosh, S., Kar, G., Roy, A., Sen(De), A.S. and Sen, and Quantum Information, 2000, Cambridge University U. Distinguishability of Bell states. Phys. Rev. A. 87, Press, ISBN 0-521-63503. 230501-230502 (2001). [2] Stolze, J. and Suter, D. Quantum computing, 2004, [11] Virmani, S., Sacchi, M.F., Plenio, M.B. and Markham, Wiley-Vich, ISBN 3-527-40438-4. D. Optimal local discrimination of two multipartite pure [3] Bouwmeester, D., Pan,J.W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Wein- states. Phys. Lett. A 288, 62-68 (2001). furter, H. and Zeilinger, A. Experimental quantum tele- [12] Chen,Y.X. and Yang, D. Optimal conclusive discrimi- portation. Nature 390, 575-579 (1997). nation of two nonorthogonal pure product multipartite [4] Pan, J.W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H. and states. Phys. Rev. A 64, 064303-064305 (2001). Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement swapping: en- [13] Lutkenhaus, N., Calsamiglia, J. and Suominen, K.A. Bell tangling photons that never interacted. Phys. Rev. Lett. measurement for teleportation. Phys. Rev. A 59, 3295- 80, 3891-3894 (1998). 3300 (1998). [5] Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Kwait, P.G. and Zeilinger, A. [14] Cola, M.M. and Paris, M.G.A. Teleportation of bipartite Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling pho- state using single entangled pair. Phys. Lett. A 337, 10-16 tons that never interacted. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891-3894 (2005). (1998). [15] Pan,J.W. and Zeilinger, A. Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger- [6] Carvalho, A.R.R., Mintert, F. and Buchleitner A. Deco- state analyzer. Phys. Rev. A 57, 2208-2211 (1998). herence and Multipartite Entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. [16] Kim,Y.H., Kulik, S.P. and Shih, Y. Quantum teleporta- 93, 230501-230504 (2004). tion of a polarization state with a complete Bell state [7] Hein, M., Dr, W. and Briegel, H.-J. Entanglement prop- measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370-1373 (2001). erties of multipartite entangled states under the influence [17] Boschi,D., Branca, S., Martini, F.D., Hardy, L., and of decoherence. Phys. Rev. A. 71, 032350-032375 (2004). Popescu, S. Experimental realization of teleporting an [8] Wootters, W.K. and Zurek, W.H. A single quantum can- unknown pure quantum state via dual classical and not be cloned. Nature 299, 802-803 (1982). Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, [9] Walgate, J., Short, A.J., Hardy, L. and Vedral, V. Lo- 1121-1125 (1998). cal distinguishability of multipartite orthogonal quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4972-4875 (2000).