DOCSLIB.ORG

Plus Ça Change in Liu Xiaobo's China - the Globe and Mail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plus Ça Change in Liu Xiaobo's China - the Globe and Mail Plus ça change in Liu Xiaobo's China - The Globe and Mail http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/plus-a-change-in-liu-xi... Hong Kong-based journalist and commentator Frank Ching. Frank Ching Plus ça change in Liu Xiaobo's China frank ching From Tuesday's Globe and Mail Published Monday, Dec. 28, 2009 7:34PM EST Last updated Wednesday, Dec. 30, 2009 2:02AM EST Last week's trial and imprisonment of Liu Xiaobo, a scholar and human-rights activist, was eerily reminiscent of another trial 72 years ago: that of Shen Junru, a legal scholar who went on to become the first president of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China. Mr. Shen was tried on charges of attempting to overthrow the government. Mr. Liu was charged with “inciting subversion of state power.” Mr. Shen co-authored documents that were considered subversive, including “A Number of Essential Conditions and Minimum Demands for a United Resistance to Invasion,” published in July of 1936, a year before his trial, calling for the Kuomintang to end the civil war with the Communists and form a united front against the Japanese. Mr. Liu was the co-author of “Charter 08,” a document released on the Internet a year before his trial, calling for an end to one-party rule and its replacement with a system based on human rights and democracy. Before Mr. Shen and his associates were arrested in what became known as the Seven Gentlemen case, they were put under “surveillance” for 250 days, first at the Shanghai municipal police station and then at the 1 of 2 02/11/2011 12:06 PM Plus ça change in Liu Xiaobo's China - The Globe and Mail http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/plus-a-change-in-liu-xi... detention house of the higher court at Suzhou. Before Mr. Liu was formally arrested, he was put under “house arrest” for half a year, not in his own house but a facility chosen by the state. During the 1937 trial, a number of leading political activists, including Soong Ching-ling, the widow of Dr. Sun Yat-sen, offered to join the accused in prison. These supporters reasoned that if Mr. Shen was guilty, they were guilty of the same offence. Last week, Mr. Liu's supporters asked to be charged because they, like many others, had signed Charter 08 before it was expunged from the Internet. “I am a part of this case. If Liu Xiaobo is to be tried, then I should be tried as well,” said Bao Tong, who was an aide to former premier Zhao Ziyang. “If Liu Xiaobo is found guilty,” he added, “it will mean that the freedom of speech and freedom of expression guaranteed in the constitution are fake.” The trial does raise questions about the rights guaranteed in China's constitution. In fact, looking at the trial of Shen Junru in 1937 (in which my father, Qin Liankui, represented Mr. Shen) and that of Liu Xiaobo in 2009, one inevitably has to make comparisons between the Kuomintang government of the time and the Communist government of today. In 1937, the Kuomintang feared a demonstration in the courtroom and announced that no observers would be allowed in. Eventually, it allowed relatives of the accused, plus the press. In 2009, the government announced it was holding an open trial but would not allow any independent observers to attend because “all permits” had been given out. While Mr. Liu's brother was allowed to observe the trial, his wife, Liu Xia, was prevented from attending by policemen posted outside her apartment. They would not let her leave her home or receive visitors during the trial. No doubt, many more people would have shown up at the courthouse to show support for Mr. Liu, but they were prevented from doing this by being kept at home or detained. Another difference between the trials: Mr. Shen was freed on bail and never sentenced, while Mr. Liu got an 11-year sentence on Christmas Day. In some ways, it seems the more things change, the more they remain the same. It is highly unlikely, however, that the Communists will elevate Liu Xiaobo to any position of honour, like Shen Junru's presidency of the Supreme People's Court. But, as Mr. Liu has said, he will be satisfied if he is the last person in China to go to prison for exercising the right to freedom of speech. Spoken like a true gentleman. Frank Ching is author of China: The Truth About Its Human Rights Record. © 2011 The Globe and Mail Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 of 2 02/11/2011 12:06 PM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chen Xitong Report on Putting Down Anti
    Recent Publications The June Turbulence in Beijing How Chinese View the Riot in Beijing Fourth Plenary Session of the CPC Central Committee Report on Down Anti-Government Riot Retrospective After the Storm VOA Disgraces Itself Report on Checking the Turmoil and Quelling the Counter-Revolutionary Rebellion June 30, 1989 Chen Xitong, State Councillor and Mayor of Beijing New Star Publishers Beijing 1989 Report on Checking the Turmoil and Quelling the Counter-Revolutionary Rebellion From June 29 to July 7 the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress - the standing organization of the highest organ of state power in the People's Republic of China - held the eighth meeting of the Seventh National People's Congress in Beijing. One of the topics for discussing at the meeting was a report on checking the turmoil and quelling the counter-revolutionary rebellion in Beijirig. The report by state councillor and mayor of Beijing Chen Xitong explained in detail the process by which a small group of people made use of the student unrest in Beijing and turned it into a counter-revolutionary rebellion by mid-June. It gave a detailed account of the nature of the riot, its severe conse- quence and the efforts made by troops enforcing _martial law, with the help of Beijing residents to quell the riot. The report exposed the behind-the-scene activities of people who stub- bornly persisted in opposing the Chinese Communist Party and socialism as well as the small handful of organizers and schemers of the riot; their collaboration with antagonistic forces at home and abroad; and the atrocities committed by former criminals in beating, looting, burning and First Edition 1989 killing in the riot.
    [Show full text]
  • Chin1821.Pdf
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt1x0nd955 No online items Finding Aid for the China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives, 1989-1993 Processed by UCLA Library Special Collections staff; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library Special Collections UCLA Library Special Collections staff Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Email: spec-coll@library.ucla.edu URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ © 2009 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. 1821 1 Descriptive Summary Title: China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives Date (inclusive): 1989-1993 Collection number: 1821 Creator: Center for Chinese Studies and the Center for Pacific Rim Studies, UCLA Extent: 22 boxes (11 linear ft.)1 oversize box. Abstract: The present finding aid represents the fruits of a multiyear collaborative effort, undertaken at the initiative of then UCLA Chancellor Charles Young, to collect, collate, classify, and annotate available materials relating to the China Democracy Movement and tiananmen crisis of 1989. These materials---including, inter alia, thousands of documents, transcribed radio broadcasts, local newspaper and journal articles, wall posters, electronic communications, and assorted ephemeral sources, some in Chinese and some in English---provide a wealth of information for scholars, present and future, who wish to gain a better understanding of the complex, swirling forces that surrounded the extraordinary "Beijing Spring" of 1989 and its tragic denouement. The scholarly community is indebted to those who have collected and arranged this archive of materials about the China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Rough Justice in Beijing: Punishing the "Black Hands" of Tiananmen Square
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title Rough Justice in Beijing: Punishing the "Black Hands" of Tiananmen Square Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7zz8w3wg Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 10(1) Author Munro, Robin Publication Date 1991 DOI 10.5070/P8101021984 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ROUGH JUSTICE IN BEIJING* Punishing the "Black Hands" of Tiananmen Square Robin Munro** 1. INTRODUCTION During late spring and early summer, namely, from mid-April to early June of 1989, a tiny handful of people exploited student unrest to launch a planned, organized and premeditated political turmoil, which later developed into a counterrevolutionary rebel- lion in Beijing, the capital. Their purpose was to overthrow the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party and subvert the so- cialist People's Republic of China.... In order to achieve thorough victory, we should mobilize the people completely, strengthen the people's democratic dictator- ship and spare no effort to ferret out the counterrevolutionary rioters. We should uncover instigators and rebellious conspira- tors, punish the organizers and schemers of the unrest and the counterrevolutionary rebellion ...and focus the crackdown on a handful of principal culprits and diehards who refuse to repent.' (Chen Xitong, Mayor of Beijing, on June 30, 1989.) In late 1990, the Chinese government brought formal charges against several dozen of the most prominent leaders of the May- June 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy movement. Trials held in the first two months of 1991 have resulted in sentences rang- ing from two to thirteen years for students and intellectuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter-Revolutionary" Offences
    EXTERNAL (for general distribution) AI Index: ASA 17/74/90 Distr: SC/CO/GR ------------------------- Amnesty International International Secretariat 1 Easton Street London WC1X 8DJ United Kingdom December 1990 CHINA--A NEW STAGE IN THE REPRESSION: PROMINENT POLITICAL DETAINEES FACE TRIAL FOR "COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY" OFFENCES Several prominent political detainees were charged in November with "counter-revolutionary" offences after being held without charge for over a year. They are among several dozen political detainees who are expected to be tried soon in Beijing for their role in the 1989 pro-democracy movement. They may face heavy prison sentences after unfair trials behind closed doors. The relatives of some of the prisoners were officially notified of the charges and expect them to go on trial soon. One of the detainees' wife, who made an unprecedented public appeal for her husband's release a few months ago, has expressed her helplessness in these terms: "I feel tiny and weak, as insignificant as a droplet of water in the sea. When I call on behalf of my husband, I hear not a sound in response." Amnesty International believes the prisoners are arbitrarily detained for the peaceful exercise of fundamental human rights and that they are unlikely to receive fair and open trials, in accordance with international standards. The organisation has called on the government to make public the identities of all people now facing trial in relation to the protests, full details of the charges against them, and the dates and places of the hearings. It has also urged the government to ensure that the trials are open to the public and conducted in accordance with international standards for fair trial, and to allow international observers to the trials.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Republic of China
    amnesty international PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Correction to the Eighth Anniversary of the 1989 Massacre - Those Who Have Been Silenced 19 May 1997 AI Index: ASA 17/20/97/cor Action Ref: CHIRAN 2/97 Distr: CO/GR/SC Please note that there has been a correction made to the addresses for Yu Zhenbin. The information and addresses below should replace the entry included in The Eighth Anniversary of the 1989 Massacre - Those Who Have Been Silenced, ASA 17/20/97 dated April 1997. YU ZHENBIN Yu Zhenbin, a prisoner of conscience, and civil servant from the Qinghai Provincial Archives Bureau was sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment in January 1991. Yu Zhenbin was apprehended on 27 June 1989 in Xining, the capital of Qinghai province, and charged with "organizing a counter-revolutionary group". He was accused of setting up the Democratic Opposition Parties’ Alliance in Xining. The authorities alleged at the time that this organization was "counter-revolutionary" and aimed at overthrowing the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Yu Zhenbin was also accused of having made three public speeches in Xining criticizing CCP policies and state leaders and distributing leaflets calling for a revised Constitution, a new central government and an end to one-party rule. Yu Zhenbin, aged 35, is being held at the Haomen Farm, Detachment No. 3, in Beizhou, Qinghai Province. Very little information is known about Yu Zhenbin, probably partly because relatively little information leaked out of Qinghai during the time of the 1989 pro-democracy protests as compared with other parts of China. He is due for release in June 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trial of Bao Tong
    August 3, 1992 Volume 4, Number 22 THE TRIAL OF BAO TONG Introduction On July 21, in the most important political trial in China in twelve years, a three-judge panel of the Beijing Intermediate People's Court sentenced Bao Tong, a leading reformer and former aide to Zhao Ziyang, to a seven-year prison term. Bao Tong had been taken into custody on May 28, 1989 and held without charge, incommunicado for much of the time, for over three years. The trial took less than six hours. Asia Watch has obtained the verdict, attached as Appendix I. Bao was given four years for "leaking an important state secret"1 and five years with two years' deprivation of political rights for "counterrevolutionary propaganda and incitement"2 during what the judges called the "serious disturbances" in Beijing in May 1989. In accordance with Article 64 of the Chinese Criminal Code, the total sentence was reduced to seven years minus time in detention, so Bao Tong will be released in 1996. He appealed the verdict, but reversals of court decisions are extraordinarily rare in China. In such a politically sensitive case, it is reasonable to assume the sentence was pre- determined at the highest levels of the Party. Background of Bao Tong At the time of his detention, Bao Tong, 59, was political secretary to the Politburo's Standing Committee and a member of the Party's Central Committee. An adviser to Zhao Ziyang for ten years, first as chief of staff and later as senior aide, Bao is widely credited with being the architect of Zhao's economic and political reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Republic of Amnesia: Tiananmen Revisited by Louisa
    Book Review: The People’s Republic of Amnesia: Tiananmen Revisited by Louisa Lim blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2014/09/15/book-review-the-peoples-republic-of-amnesia-tiananmen- revisited-by-louisa-lim/ 2014-9-15 In The People’s Republic of Amnesia, NPR and former BBC correspondent Louisa Lim aims to chart how the events of June 4th 1989 changed China, and how China changed the events of Tiananmen Square by rewriting its own history. Andrea Janku finds this a persuasive and fascinating read. The People’s Republic of Amnesia: Tiananmen Revisited. Louisa Lim. Oxford University Press. 2014. Find this book: It is astonishing that the 25th anniversary of one of the key events in China’s modern history has triggered comparatively little academic activity. The occupation of Tiananmen Square by student demonstrators in the spring of 1989 and the ensuing massacre in the streets of Beijing committed by the People’s Liberation Army was an event that brought many consequences for China. It thoroughly put an end to any reform of China’s political system while ensuring the continuation and indeed acceleration of the country’s economic transformation. It also ushered in a new era in which the history of class struggle has been turned into a history of China’s national humiliation. Finally, it made it possible to elevate nationalism and consumerism to core values supported by the party-state and to legitimate to a considerable extent the enormous effort and cost of the now most important task of ‘stability maintenance’. So far so good, only that for all that to work the state has to provide the authoritative version of events, alternative accounts of what actually happened have to be eliminated, or what happened should simply not be spoken about and ideally be simply forgotten.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nightmarish Year Under Xi Jinping's
    Promoting human rights & empowering grassroots activism in China A Nightmarish Year Under Xi Jinping’s “Chinese Dream” 2013 Annual Report on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders in China March 2014 Web: www.chrdnet.com • Email: contact@chrdnet.com Table of Contents Introduction: Defining Features of 2013 1 Crackdown on Liberties That Are Fundamental to Civil Society 4 Judicial Authorities Lend a Hand in Reining in Online Speech & Media 7 Bold Reprisals & Violence Against Human Rights Lawyers 10 Reprisals Against Activists Seeking Participation 12 in UN Human Rights Reviews New Leaders Follow Old Patterns 14 Recommendations 15 Notes 17 Index of Chinese Human Rights Defenders Whose Cases CHRD 25 Reported or Documented in 2013 Cover: Chinese citizens inspired by the “New Citizens’ Movement” () took to the streets in 2013 to rally for anti-corruption measures, calling on top government officials to disclose their personal wealth. “2013 saw the harshest suppression of civil society in over a decade…with human rights and rule of law basically going backwards. Still, the drive in Chinese civil society to keep fighting under difficult and dangerous conditions is the most important asset for promoting human rights and democratization in the country.” - Teng Biao, Chinese human rights lawyer Introduction: Defining Features of 2013 Human rights defenders in China experienced a tumultuous year of government suppression, yet they continued to demonstrate remarkable strength and extraordinary courage.1 In interviews and discussions conducted by Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD), dozens of Chinese activists describe 2013 as the worst year for human rights since at least 2008, which saw severe crackdowns on civil liberties around the Beijing Olympics and with the Charter 08 campaign for reform.
    [Show full text]
  • The 20Th Anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Protests: Examining the Signifi- Cance of the 1989 Demonstrations in China and Implications for U.S
    THE 20TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE TIANANMEN SQUARE PROTESTS: EXAMINING THE SIGNIFI- CANCE OF THE 1989 DEMONSTRATIONS IN CHINA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. POLICY HEARING BEFORE THE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 4, 2009 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 51–191 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 12:52 Nov 03, 2009 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\DOCS\51191.TXT DEIDRE VerDate Nov 24 2008 12:52 Nov 03, 2009 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\DOCS\51191.TXT DEIDRE CO N T E N T S Page Opening statement of Hon. Byron Dorgan, Chairman, Congressional-Execu- tive Commission on China ................................................................................... 1 Walz, Hon. Tim, a U.S. Representative from Minnesota, Member, Congres- sional-Executive Commission on China ............................................................. 3 Barrasso, Hon. John, a U.S. Senator from Wyoming, Member, Congressional- Executive Commission on China ........................................................................ 4 Smith, Hon. Christopher H., a U.S. Representative from New Jersey, Ranking Member, Congressional-Executive Commission on China ................................ 4 Pitts, Hon. Joseph R., a U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania, Member, Congressional-Executive Commission on China ................................................ 6 Wu, Hon. David, a U.S. Representative from Oregon, Member, Congressional- Executive Commission on China .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Censorship and Deletion Practices in Chinese Social Media∗
    Censorship and Deletion Practices in Chinese Social Media∗ David Bamman∗ Brendan O’Connory Noah A. Smith∗† ∗Language Technologies Institute yMachine Learning Department School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University {dbamman,brenocon,nasmith}@cs.cmu.edu Abstract With Twitter and Facebook blocked in China, the stream of information from Chinese domestic social media provides a case study of social media behavior under the influence of active censorship. While much work has looked at efforts to prevent access to information in China (including IP blocking of foreign websites or search engine filtering), we present here the first large-scale analysis of political content censorship in social media, i.e., the active deletion of messages published by individuals. In a statistical analysis of 56 million messages (212,583 of which have been deleted out of 1.3 million checked, more than 16%) from the domestic Chinese microblog site Sina Weibo, and 11 million Chinese-language messages from Twitter, we uncover a set a politically sensitive terms whose presence in a message leads to anomalously higher rates of deletion. We also note that the rate of message deletion is not uniform throughout the country, with messages originating in the outlying provinces of Tibet and Qinghai exhibiting much higher deletion rates than those from eastern areas like Beijing. 1 Introduction Much research on Internet censorship has focused on only one of its aspects: IP and DNS filtering within censored countries of websites beyond their jurisdiction, such as the so-called “Great Firewall of China” (GFW) that prevents Chinese residents from accessing foreign websites such as Google and Facebook (FLOSS, 2011; OpenNet Initiative, 2009; Roberts et al., 2009), or Egypt’s temporary blocking of social media websites such as Twitter during its protests in January 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • A Message of Hope Through Jesus
    Ling Chai Founder & President All Girls Allowed – In Jesus’ Name, Simply Love Her Monday, June 3, 2013 Testimony to The Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations, and The Committee on Foreign Affairs, in the U.S. House of Representatives A Message of Hope through Jesus To the Honorable Chairman Chris Smith, and to the Honorable Members of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Thank you Chairman Smith, for your tireless effort to uphold the human rights of all people in China, and in the world. I am deeply honored to be given the opportunity to share a message of hope and redemption through Jesus on the 24th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square tragedy and massacre. My message is a summary of lessons learned from a 47-year life journey of growing up in China, having led the Tiananmen Square movement and now living and observing America for the past 23 years. The longer and fuller version was documented and published in my book: A Heart for Freedom. (published in October 2011) My message is for the distinguished Congressional leaders and foreign affairs policymakers like yourseleves. It is for American President Barrack Obama and China’s New President Xi Jinping, who will meet on the West Coast in a few days. It is also for church leaders in both countries; for the Tiananmen Square dissidents, victims and their families; and for the people at large. I believe that despite constant acts of terrorism, threats in the Middle East, and turbulence around the rest of the world, a godly partnership between America and 1 China holds the key to a peaceful, stable and prosperous world.
    [Show full text]
  • Xi Jinping's Inner Circle (Part 4: the Mishu Cluster I) Cheng Li
    Xi Jinping’s Inner Circle (Part 4: The Mishu Cluster I) Cheng Li Mentor-protégé ties play an important role in elite formation in virtually all kinds of political systems. But arguably no country gives more prominent advantage in terms of later political career promotions to those who have previously served as personal assistants to senior leaders than China. This phenomenon of having a large presence of leaders with such experience in Chinese officialdom has led to the romanization of the Chinese term mishu (秘书) to refer to this group. At present, more than three-quarters of cabinet ministers and provincial governors have served as mishu.1 Of the current 25 members of the Politburo, 16 (64 percent) have served in such roles, and of the seven-member Politburo Standing Committee, five (71 percent) have mishu backgrounds. Xi Jinping himself served as a mishu for the minister of defense for three years in his late 20s, and this experience helped him tremendously later as he advanced in his career, especially in enhancing his credentials in military affairs. Xi’s personal assistants, both previous and current, have constituted a major cluster of his inner circle. Because of their very close working relationships with Xi, they are often among his most trusted confidants. It is also important and interesting to note that while the power and influence of Xi’s mishu cluster in the leadership was growing rapidly, the recent purges of senior leaders, such as Zhou Yongkang, Xu Caihou, and Ling Jihua, all began with the removal or prosecution of their mishu.
    [Show full text]