National NGO Monitoring of Baku-Tbilisi Ceyhan Oil Pipeline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National NGO Monitoring of Baku-Tbilisi Ceyhan Oil Pipeline NATIONAL NGO MONITORING OF AZERBAIJAN SECTION OF BAKU-TBILISI CEYHAN (BTC) OIL PIPELINE MONITORING WORKING GROUP ON ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL IMPACTS OF BTC PIPELINE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE F I N A L R E P O R T Members of the Monitoring Group: Gulaya Guliyeva, Coordinator, Merhemet (Charity) Foundation Ilham Huseynli, Evaluator, Public Union for Socio-Strategic Studies and Analytical Research Mirvari Gahramanly, Group Member, Committee for the Protection of Oil Workers Rights Zohrab Ismayilov, Group Member, Free Economy Centre Shahin Ramazanov, Group Member, Ojag Public Union Tamkin Eminli, Group Member, Azerbaijan Diabetes League Baku-2005 DISCLAIMER The contents of this report should be treated as the opinions and conclusions of the monitoring group members. In no way does this report reflect the policies or views of the project sponsor or any other organisation concerned. The authors are solely responsible for any mistakes in this report. The report reflects the results of the monitoring conducted by various means. However, for reasons beyond our will, in some cases, it was not possible to learn the views of all of the parties concerned. All group members signatory hereto are in agreement with the contents of this report. Signatures: Gulaya Guliyeva ____________________ Ilham Huseynli ____________________ Zohrab Ismayilov ____________________ Mirvari Gahramanly ____________________ Shahin Ramazanov ____________________ Tamkin Eminli ____________________ Gulaye Guliyeva Ilham Huseynli Zohrab Ismayilov Coordinator Evaluator Group Member Mirvari Gahramanly Shahin Ramazanov Tamkin Eminli Group Member Group Member Group Member 2 Experts: Ehtiram Soltanoglu, Scientific-Technological Progress and Education Foundation Azad Aliyev, Public Union for Socio-Economic Research Mushfig Huseynov, Himayadar Relief Organisation Ehtiram Soltanoglu Azad Aliyev Mushfig Huseynov Expert Expert Sociologist 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 ACHIEVEMENTS....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 FINDINGS .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 PROPOSALS AND RECOMMENDATION .......................................................................................... 6 2. EVALUATOR’S STATEMENT.............................................................................................................................. 8 3. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 10 4. METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................................. 11 5. MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY........................................................................................ 12 6. RESULTS OF SURVEYS AND INTERVIEWS.............................................................................................. 13 6.1. RESULTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS REGARDING THE FULFILMENT OF COMMITMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROGRAMME (CIP)...........................................................................15 6.2. RESULTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS ON IMPACTS OF BTC CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON THE LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE .......................................................................................18 7. ANALYSIS OF MONITORING FINDINGS................................................................................................... 22 7.1. ACHIEVEMENTS.....................................................................................................................22 7.2 FINDINGS ......................................................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 7.3. PROPOSALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:......................................................................................34 7.4. RESULTS OF MONITORING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ..................................................... 1 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 1 9. ANNEX AND REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 1 APPENDIX 1: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF 2004 ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED ON BEHALF OF BTC IN VARIOUS COMMUNITIES UNDER CIP PROJECTS:.........................................1 1. Executive Summary This present report sponsored by the Open Society Institute-Assistance Foundation (OSI-AF). It reflects the activities conducted within the framework of the project on “Monitoring Social Impact of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Pipeline on Local Communities Residing along the Pipeline Route.” Objectives of monitoring: 1. Study and assessment of the implementation of Community Investment Programme (CIP) in compliance with BP/BTC commitments 2. Study and assessment of the impacts of BTC construction activities on the local communities and infrastructure 3. Study and assessment of the working conditions and social status of local workers currently and previously involved in BTC pipeline construction The purpose of the CIP is to make a positive contribution to the sustainable socio-economic development of affected communities along the Azeri section of the BTC oil pipeline. In order to achieve the goal , the CIP sets up the following objectives (Reference: BP presentation materials on the CIP): • Improvement of social welfare and business opportunities of communities affected by BTC/SCP projects • Supporting community access to improved social infrastructure • Support for raising awareness on issues related to health and sanitation • Assistance to agricultural development in the regions along the pipeline route Prior to the monitoring, the working group held discussions with BP/BTC representatives from the relevant departments and listened to comprehensive presentations on BTC’s social commitments and Community Investment Programmer (CIP) strategy. These discussions addressed BTC activities aimed at fulfilling the obligations, as well as the company’s achievements and constraints. The working group also conducted a number of meetings with the BTC Social Performance and Social Investment Manager and numerous other responsible individuals, thus familiarising themselves with CIP goals and objectives and the strategy of its implementation. It was a concern to the group that although the monitoring was implemented during the last quarter of 2004, BP provided the monitoring group with information regarding the budget of the CIP implementing partners, namely four international NGOs, which related primarily to the first quarter of 2004. The monitoring of both CIP and the impact of construction activities were implemented through the use of three major components: questionnaire survey, interviews (discussion) and observation (including photography and video filming). The group spent 60 days implementing the monitoring procedures. Firstly, group members conducted pilot monitoring lasting eight days. The monitoring aimed to define methodology and a unified approach for group members, as well as to make preparations for conducting the core section of the monitoring. After analysing the results of the pilot monitoring, group members split into three subgroups, with each group identifying its target areas and communities. The monitoring executed by each subgroup lasted for 16 days, totalling 48 days of monitoring. In addition, the working group monitored CCIC and Spie Capag-Petrofac operations for four days, two days per company. The monitoring statistics include: • Number of companies and organisations involved in discussions and questionnaire surveys (NGOs and companies directly or indirectly participating in BTC CIP) – 9 • Number of communities visited – 86 (in 11 regions) • Number of people contacted during the monitoring period – up to 3,000; including • Expats – 60, Citizens of Azerbaijan – up to 2,940 • Males – up to 2,400, females – up to 600 • Representatives of municipalities – 153 • Members of community groups – 328 • Representatives of organisations implementing CIP – 36 • Representatives of companies involved in BTC pipeline construction – 75; and, Respondents involved in questionnaire survey – 600 Number of interviewees – 338 Audio recording – 28 hours Video filming – 6 hours Number of photos – 202 We would like to note that although there were 600 respondents involved in the questionnaire survey, only 479 questionnaires were valid. This is for the reason that 19 questionnaires were left almost entirely blank and 102 were incomplete or completed improperly without observing survey procedures. Consequently, it was impossible to summarise the results of these questionnaires. We would like to d stress that, due to a shortage of time and other reasons beyond our control, it was impossible to undertake a classical, random selection of respondents. In other words, the working group maintained a balance among communities and involved those community members in the questionnaire survey, with whom the working group had met and who had agreed to participate. This method can be considered to be a mixture of quota sampling and opportunistic
Recommended publications
  • Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility Republic of Azerbaijan: Road Network Development Investment Program Tranche I: Southern Road Corridor Improvement
    Environmental Assessment Report Summary Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 39176 January 2007 Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility Republic of Azerbaijan: Road Network Development Investment Program Tranche I: Southern Road Corridor Improvement Prepared by the Road Transport Service Department for the Asian Development Bank. The summary environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. The views expressed herein are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s members, Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. 2 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 2 January 2007) Currency Unit – Azerbaijan New Manat/s (AZM) AZM1.00 = $1.14 $1.00 = AZM0.87 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank DRMU – District Road Maintenance Unit EA – executing agency EIA – environmental impact assessment EMP – environmental management plan ESS – Ecology and Safety Sector IEE – initial environmental examination MENR – Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources MFF – multitranche financing facility NOx – nitrogen oxides PPTA – project preparatory technical assistance ROW – right-of-way RRI – Rhein Ruhr International RTSD – Road Transport Service Department SEIA – summary environmental impact assessment SOx – sulphur oxides TERA – TERA International Group, Inc. UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization WHO – World Health Organization WEIGHTS AND MEASURES C – centigrade m2 – square meter mm – millimeter vpd – vehicles per day CONTENTS MAP I. Introduction 1 II. Description of the Project 3 IIII. Description of the Environment 11 A. Physical Resources 11 B. Ecological and Biological Environment 13 C.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT “AZERROADSERVICE” OJC Azerbaijan Highway Project II-Additional Financing IBRD Loan No. 7516 AZ Public Disclosure Authorized Upgrading of Baku-Shamakhi Road Section of Baku-Shamakhi- Yevlakh Road, preparation of Environmental Assessment and Environmental Management Plan Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized November 2013 Studi e Azerbaijan Republic – Ministry of Transport Pianificazione del Territorio “AZERROADSERVICE” OJC Table of contents 0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 0.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS STUDIES ....................................................................................... 4 0.2 SCOPE OF THE PRESENT REPORT ............................................................................................................. 4 0.3 REPORT STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................. 5 0.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................... 5 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FOR PARTICIPANTS ONLY 14 March 2017 ENGLISH ONLY
    Presentation issued without formal editing FOR PARTICIPANTS ONLY 14 March 2017 ENGLISH ONLY UNITED NATIONS CENTRE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT In collaboration with Ministry of Public Works and Transport, the Government of Lao PDR, Ministry of the Environment (MOE), Japan Partnership on Sustainable, Low Carbon Transport, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, and United Nations Office for Sustainable Development TENTH REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT (EST) FORUM IN ASIA, 14-16 MARCH 2016, VIENTIANE, LAO PDR Country Presentation (Azerbaijan) (Presentation for EST Plenary Session 6: of the Provisional Programme) ------------------------------------- This presentation has been prepared by the Government of Azerbaijan for the Tenth Regional EST Forum in Asia. The views expressed herein are those of the author/s only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Intergovernmental Tenth Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia Regional Seminar on Inclusive and Sustainable Transport & Vientiane International Mayors Forum Country Presentation Rural transport in Azerbaijan By Emil Ahmadov Leading adviser Department
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Azerbaijan Ministry of Transport Road Transport Services Department
    Supplementary Appendix C Republic of Azerbaijan Ministry of Transport Road Transport Services Department EAST–WEST HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESETTLEMENT PLAN June 2005 THIS IS NOT AN ADB BOARD APPROVED DOCUMENT To: Head of the Road Maintenance Agency of Gornboy/Yevlax/Ganja/Xanlar The draft Resettlement Plan for the Rehabilitation of the East-West Corridor Road of the Azerbaijan Republic has been prepared by the Road Transport Service Department in accordance with the Azerbaijan law and ADB guidelines on resettlement. The Resettlement Plan covers land acquisition and other resettlement aspects for the rehabilitation of the road segments from Yevlax to Ganja and from Gazax to the border with Georgia. The draft Resettlement Plan is based on the studies of social and economic conditions of businesses, ordinary people and families that have been affected by the above mentioned road rehabilitation project as well as on the consultations with local authorities. The impact shown in the Resettlement Plan reflects the results of the Technical Assistance provided by the ADB. The draft Resettlement Plan will be upgraded and completely finalized in 2006 . This draft Resettlement Plan has been approved by RTSD and ADB and may be disclosed to all affected communities and people. We authorize your agency to disclose the Resettlement Plan to all concerned parties as necessary. Attachment: draft resettlement Plan – 54 pages Head of the Road Maintenance Division V. Hajiyev CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND 1.1. Outline of the Project 1.2 Status of the Road Reserve 2. SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN THE PROJECT AREA 2.1 Project Impact Areas 2.2 Social Profile of the Project Areas 3.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Azerbaijan (Textbook)
    DILGAM ISMAILOV HISTORY OF AZERBAIJAN (TEXTBOOK) Azerbaijan Architecture and Construction University Methodological Council of the meeting dated July 7, 2017, was published at the direction of № 6 BAKU - 2017 Dilgam Yunis Ismailov. History of Azerbaijan, AzMİU NPM, Baku, 2017, p.p.352 Referents: Anar Jamal Iskenderov Konul Ramiq Aliyeva All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means. Electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. In Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, the book “History of Azerbaijan” is written on the basis of a syllabus covering all topics of the subject. Author paid special attention to the current events when analyzing the different periods of Azerbaijan. This book can be used by other high schools that also teach “History of Azerbaijan” in English to bachelor students, master students, teachers, as well as to the independent learners of our country’s history. 2 © Dilgam Ismailov, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………….……… 9 I Theme. Introduction to the history of Azerbaijan 10 II Theme: The Primitive Society in Azerbaijan…. 18 1.The Initial Residential Dwellings……….............… 18 2.The Stone Age in Azerbaijan……………………… 19 3.The Copper, Bronze and Iron Ages in Azerbaijan… 23 4.The Collapse of the Primitive Communal System in Azerbaijan………………………………………….... 28 III Theme: The Ancient and Early States in Azer- baijan. The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms.. 30 1.The First Tribal Alliances and Initial Public Institutions in Azerbaijan……………………………. 30 2.The Kingdom of Manna…………………………… 34 3.The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms………….
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict: Return and Its Alternatives
    Forced displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict: return and its alternatives August 2011 conciliation resources Place-names in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict are contested. Place-names within Nagorny Karabakh itself have been contested throughout the conflict. Place-names in the adjacent occupied territories have become increasingly contested over time in some, but not all (and not official), Armenian sources. Contributors have used their preferred terms without editorial restrictions. Variant spellings of the same name (e.g., Nagorny Karabakh vs Nagorno-Karabakh, Sumgait vs Sumqayit) have also been used in this publication according to authors’ preferences. Terminology used in the contributors’ biographies reflects their choices, not those of Conciliation Resources or the European Union. For the map at the end of the publication, Conciliation Resources has used the place-names current in 1988; where appropriate, alternative names are given in brackets in the text at first usage. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of Conciliation Resources or the European Union. Altered street sign in Shusha (known as Shushi to Armenians). Source: bbcrussian.com Contents Executive summary and introduction to the Karabakh Contact Group 5 The Contact Group papers 1 Return and its alternatives: international law, norms and practices, and dilemmas of ethnocratic power, implementation, justice and development 7 Gerard Toal 2 Return and its alternatives: perspectives
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Research Centre Strengthening Municipalities In
    Economic Research Centre Strengthening Municipalities in Azerbaijan Concept Paper This paper has been prepared within the framework of Oxfam, GB and ICCO, Netherlands co-funded project “The Role of Local self-governments in Poverty reduction in Azerbaijan” Expert group members working on the concept: Research Team Leader: Rovshan Agayev: Other Team Members: Gubad Ibadoglu Azer Mehtiyev Aydin Aslanov Translated by: Elshad Mikayilov Baku 2007 1 INTRODUCTION Democratic political system, creation of effective public management and eradication of socio-economic recession are the major challenges facing most of the world countries. The analysis of experience across highly developed countries reveals that the road to democratic and economic prosperity is quite clear. The matter has more to deal with the rejection of authoritarian type of management both in political and economic realms, establishment of market oriented relations and liberal economic environment. Liberal political and economic system in the country first and foremost presupposes deeper decentralization along with the autonomous strong municipal institutions from the perspectives of administration and financial capacity. However, a number of transition countries do not have any precise policy or concept for decentralization. They seem to be conservative towards any other external efforts or initiatives with that respect. The situation is even more complicated by a higher level of corruption in public administration and high-rank public officials preponderantly pursuing their own
    [Show full text]
  • 1 S PIP CQUI – Azer ELINE SITIO Rbai
    SOUTH CAUCASUS PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT GUIDE TO LAND ACCQUISITION AND COMPENSATION – Azerbaijan, AMENDMENT 1 This is an amendment to the Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation (GLAC) prepared for the South Caucasuus Pipeline Expansion (SCPX) project activities in Azerbaijan. This document updates the version of the GLAC issued in 2015 to account for updates to the land rental and crop compensation rates and is applicable to new land acquisiition undertaken from April 1st, 2017 onwards. It was prepared by SCP Co. based on inputs from independent consultants specialised in land acquisition. The equivalent information in the GLAC, 2015 are updated by the information below. All other information as it relates to land acquisition and compensation within the GLAC, 2015 remains unchanged and applies to all new SCPX land acquisition and compensation activities. This Amendment does not apply to existing lease agreements or user agreements. This document is also available on the Reports and Publications page at www.bp.com/caspian. This document is presented in English and Azerbaijani languages. In the event of any conflict or disagreement in interpretation of any provisions between tthese different language versions, the English version shall bee the definitive, prevailing document. Inquiries in relation to this document can be addressed to the following address or telephone numbeer: SCP Co. BP Xazar Centre Port Baku 153 Neftchilar Avenue AZ1010 Baku Azerbaijan Tel: (+994) 12 599 3000 (Switchboard) 1 APPENDIX 1 – PROJECT COMPENSATION RATES
    [Show full text]
  • BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2010
    BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2010 www.bp.com/caspian/sr 2 Introduction by the president of the BP Azerbaijan-Georgia-Turkey region 3 This is BP in Azerbaijan / 17 How we operate / 29 Safety and health / 35 Environment / 43 Society 52 Five-year performance data / 53 EITI reported data / 55 Report process and feedback Scope of report The scope of this report covers the calendar year ending 31 December 2010. All dollar amounts are in US dollars. Unless otherwise specified, the text does not distinguish between the operations and activities of BP p.l.c. and those of its subsidiaries and affiliates. References in this report to ‘us’, ‘we’ and ‘our’ relate to BP in Azerbaijan unless otherwise stated. In this report when we refer to BP in Azerbaijan we refer to our operations in Azerbaijan only. If we refer to BP AGT we are referring to our activities in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey. Specific references to ‘BP’ and the ‘BP group’ mean BP p.l.c., its subsidiaries and affiliates. Front cover image Challenge drilling engineer Aysel Javadova at Deepwater Gunashli platform Cautionary statement The BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2010 contains certain forward-looking statements relating, in particular, to recoverable volumes and resources, capital, operating and other expenditures, and future projects. Actual results may differ from those expressed in such statements depending on a variety of factors including supply and demand developments, pricing and operational issues and political, legal, fiscal, commercial and social circumstances. Group sustainability reporting bp.com/sustainability What’s inside? The 2010 BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report covers our business 2 Introduction by the president of the BP performance, environmental record and wider role in Azerbaijan Azerbaijan-Georgia- during 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Health System Review
    Health Systems in Transition Vol. 12 No. 3 2010 Azerbaijan Health system review Fuad Ibrahimov • Aybaniz Ibrahimova Jenni Kehler • Erica Richardson Erica Richardson (Editor) and Martin McKee (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT profile Editorial Board Editor in chief Elias Mossialos, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin Technical University, Germany Josep Figueras, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Martin McKee, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom Richard Saltman, Emory University, United States Editorial team Sara Allin, University of Toronto, Canada Matthew Gaskins, Berlin Technical University, Germany Cristina Hernández-Quevedo, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Anna Maresso, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies David McDaid, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sherry Merkur, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Philipa Mladovsky, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Bernd Rechel, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Erica Richardson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sarah Thomson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Ewout van Ginneken, Berlin University of Technology, Germany International advisory board Tit Albreht, Institute of Public Health, Slovenia Carlos Alvarez-Dardet Díaz, University of Alicante, Spain Rifat Atun, Global Fund, Switzerland Johan Calltorp, Nordic School of Public Health,
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Territorial Divisions in Different Historical Periods
    Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A R Y TERRITORIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS C O N T E N T I. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................. 3 II. BAKU ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. General background of Baku ............................................................................................................................ 5 2. History of the city of Baku ................................................................................................................................. 7 3. Museums ........................................................................................................................................................... 16 4. Historical Monuments ...................................................................................................................................... 20 The Maiden Tower ............................................................................................................................................ 20 The Shirvanshahs’ Palace ensemble ................................................................................................................ 22 The Sabael Castle .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MANUEL HASRATIAN Moscow a Number of Kurdish Settlements In
    THE KURDS IN THE USSR AND IN THE CIS (A Brief Account) MANUEL HASRATIAN Moscow A number of Kurdish settlements in Russia appeared as a result of migrations during the first half of the 19th century after the Turkmanchai Treaty between Russia and Iran was signed in 1828, and the Adrianapole Treaty of 1829 between Russia and the Ottoman Empire. In the Russia Empire the Kurds lived a nomadic existence during the 19th century. In the second half of the century, they were largely living in the Erivan (Yerevan), Echmiadzin and Surmalu sub-districts of the Erivan district. All of them were divided into kin and tribe groups, their confessions being Sunnah, Shi'a and Yezidi. Presently the main bulk of the Kurdish population in the CIS lives in the Transcauca- sian and Central Asian states, in Armenian, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. In Armenia they live in the Aparan, Echmiadzin, Talin, Ashtarak, Artashat and Armavir districts. Georgian Kurds are concentrated mainly in the capital of the Republic, in Tbilisi, most of them having emigrated from Armenia. The Kurds of Armenia and Georgia almost entirely belong to the followers of the Yezidi religion, unlike their compatriots in Az- erbaijan who are Muslims par excellence. The Kurds of Azerbaijan occupy a vast territory between Kalbajar in the North and Zanguelan in the East, including the Lachin and Kubatli districts. The Kurds are also living in the Autonomous Republic of Nakhichevan, in the Khachmas and Yevlakh districts. In Turkmenistan the Kurds appeared as a result of various migration waves from Khorasan (Iran).
    [Show full text]