IJIRT | Volume 2 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IJIRT | Volume 2 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002 © November 2015 | IJIRT | Volume 2 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002 .Net Surbhi Bhardwaj Dronacharya College of Engineering Khentawas, Haryana INTRODUCTION as smartphones. Additionally, .NET Micro .NET Framework (pronounced dot net) is Framework is targeted at severely resource- a software framework developed by Microsoft that constrained devices. runs primarily on Microsoft Windows. It includes a large class library known as Framework Class Library (FCL) and provides language WHAT IS THE .NET FRAMEWORK? interoperability(each language can use code written The .NET Framework is a new and revolutionary in other languages) across several programming platform created by Microsoft for languages. Programs written for .NET Framework developingapplications. execute in a software environment (as contrasted to hardware environment), known as Common It is a platform for application developers. Language Runtime (CLR), an application virtual It is a Framework that supports Multiple machine that provides services such as Language and Cross language integration. security, memory management, and exception handling. FCL and CLR together constitute .NET IT has IDE (Integrated Development Framework. Environment). FCL provides user interface, data access, database Framework is a set of utilities or can say connectivity, cryptography, web building blocks of your application system. application development, numeric algorithms, .NET Framework provides GUI in a GUI and network communications. Programmers manner. produce software by combining their own source code with .NET Framework and other libraries. .NET is a platform independent but with .NET Framework is intended to be used by most new help of Mono Compilation System (MCS). applications created for the Windows platform. MCS is a middle level interface. Microsoft also produces an integrated development .NET Framework provides interoperability environment largely for .NET software called Visual between languages i.e. Common Type Studio. System (CTS) . .NET Framework started out as a proprietary .NET Framework also includes the .NET framework, although the company worked Common Language Runtime (CLR), which to standardize the software stack almost is responsible for maintaining the immediately, even before its first release. Despite execution of all applications developed the standardization efforts, developers—particularly using the .NET library. those in the free and open-source software communities—expressed their uneasiness The .NET Framework consists primarily of with the selected terms and the prospects of any free a gigantic library of code. and open-source implementation, especially with .NET FRAMEWORK LANGUAGE SUPPORT regard to software patents. Since then, Microsoft has changed .NET development to more closely follow Ada a contemporary model of a community-developed A# for .NET[1] - a port of Ada to software project, including issuing an update to its the Microsoft .NET Framework, patent that promises to address the concerns. free from the Department of .NET Framework family also includes two versions Computer Science at the United for mobile or embedded device use. A reduced States Air Force Academy under version of the framework,.NET Compact the terms of the GNU general Framework, is available on Windows CE platforms, public license including Windows Mobile devices such APL IJIRT 142723 247 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY © November 2015 | IJIRT | Volume 2 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002 Dyalog APL (Dyalog Ltd) OCAMIL (Emmanuel Chailloux & Raphael Montelatici) AsmL CAT Abstract State Machine Language (Microsoft Research) CAT (Christopher Diggins) BETA COBOL BETA.Net (University of Aarhus, NetCOBOL for .NET[2] - Denmark) from Fujitsu Corporation Boo NeoKicks (Fujitsu) Boo (Python-inspired syntax by Net Express (Micro Focus) Rodrigo B. de Oliveira, Georges CULE Benatti) CULE.Net (Software C Perspectives) lcc (ANSI C Compiler from Eiffel Princeton) Eiffel ENViSioN! (Eiffel cscc (ANSI C Compiler from Software) Portable.NET) Forth C# Delta Forth .NET (Valer Visual C# (Microsoft) BOCAN) Mono C# FORTRAN Compiler (Mono/Ximian) Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran for cscc (DotGNU Portable.NET) .NET (Lahey Computer Systems, Variants: Inc.) CSI (a simple C# FTN95 - Fortran for Microsoft Interpreter by Steve .NET (Salford Software Ltd.) Donovan) Haskell Cω (Microsoft Research) Hugs98 for .NET Parallel C# - (formerly Haskell for .NET (using MC# by Vadim B. Mondrian for .NET) (Nigel Perry) Guzev) Haskell.net Project Metaphor (Gregory Neverov at Queensland IL/MSIL University of MSIL (Microsoft) Technology) ilasm (IL Assembler from Spec# (Microsoft Microsoft) Research) ilasm (Mono/Ximian) C++ Portable.NET Managed Extensions for Assembler (dotGNU; no specific C++ (Microsoft) link, but project still active) Caml Java F# (Microsoft) Visual J# .NET (Microsoft) IJIRT 142723 248 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY © November 2015 | IJIRT | Volume 2 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002 IKVM.NET - Java VM for .NET Pan (Jeroen Frijters) Pan# (Computer Languages for JavaScript Secondary Education) DotGnu JScript (dotGNU) Perl Lexico Perl for .NET, PerlNET (ActiveState SRL.) Lexico; English version here (page is in Spanish, with PerlSharp (Joshua Tauberer) English translation) Pascal variants: LISP Delphi (Borland) clisp (Microsoft) Delphi.NET - interoperability DotLisp (Rich Hickey) tools (Marcus Schmidt) L# (L Sharp .NET) - LISP-based PHP script language (Rob Blackwell) PHP4Mono (Raphael Romeikat) FOIL - (Rich Hickey and Eric PHP4Apps - Unmanaged wrapper Thorsen) (Daaron) RDNZL - .NET Layer for Phalanger Common Lisp (Edi Weitz) Processing LOGO Processing.NET (Jonatan Rubio, TurtleTracks.net et al) Logo (University of Patras) Prolog Lua P# (Jon Cook at Univ. of Lua.NET: Integrating Lua with Edinburgh) Rotor (PUC-RIO) Prolog.NET (Oregon Institute of Mercury Technology) Mercury on .NET Python Mixal Assembly Language IronPython (Microsoft) MixNet (SourceForge) Python for .NET - .NET Modula-2 Integration with Python (Brian Lloyd) GPM/CLR (Queensland University of Technology) Ruby Mondrian Mono Ruby.NET (Jaen, Mono developers) Mondrian for .NET (Nigel Perry) NetRuby (arton) Oberon RubyCLR (John Lam) Active Oberon for .NET (ETH Zuerich) Ruby.NET (Dr. Wayne Kelly) Component Pascal (QUT) RPG Nemerle ASNA Visual RPG for .NET Nemerle (The University of Scala Wroclaw) IJIRT 142723 249 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY © November 2015 | IJIRT | Volume 2 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002 Scala on Microsoft.NET (Martin Odersky, LAMP at EPFL) Scheme Common Larceny (Northeastern University) Bigloo (Inria Sophia-Antipolis) Tachy (Ken Rawlings) Smalltalk #Smalltalk (John Brant & Don Roberts) SML (Standard Meta Language) SML.NET (Microsoft Research, University of Cambridge) Synergy Synergy (Synergex, now known as Synergy/DE) Tcl/Tk TickleSharp (jscottb, Novell Forge) Visual Basic Visual Basic.NET (Microsoft) Mono Visual Basic Compiler (Mono/Ximian) bmcs (Jambunathan) Variants: KPL - Kid's Programming Language (Morrison Schwartz) REFERENCES https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Frame work http://www.c- sharpcorner.com/uploadfile/puranindia/net -framework-and-architecture/ http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/List_of_lan guages_using_the_.NET_Framework IJIRT 142723 250 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY.
Recommended publications
  • Wykład IV: Platforma .Net
    ModelowanieModelowanie ii ProgramowanieProgramowanie ObiektoweObiektowe Wykład IV: Platforma .Net 28 październik 2013 Platforma .NET ● Platforma .NET według Microsoft to integralny komponent systemu Windows umożliwiający tworzenie i uruchamianie nowoczesnych aplikacji i usług sieciowych. Cele realizowane w ramach platformy: – Dostarcza kompletne zorientowane obiektowo środowisko niezależnie czy obiekt: przechowywany i uruchamiany lokalnie, wykonywany lokalnie i rozproszony w Internecie czy wykonywany zdalnie – Środowisko wykonawcze minimalizujące konflikty podczas wytwarzania i wersjonowania oprogramowania – Środowisko wykonawcze wspierające bezpieczne i wydajne wykonanie kodu – Zapewnia spójność pomiędzy aplikacjami przeznaczonymi na platformę Windows czy opartymi na technologiach Web'owych Platforma .NET - komponenty ● Wspólne środowisko uruchomieniowe (ang. Common Language runtime) – Agent zarządzający kodem podczas wykonania – Zarządzanie pamięcią – Zarządzanie wątkami – Zdalność (ang. remoting) – Bezpieczeństwo (typowanie – CTS – sprawdzanie typów, dokładność, zarządzanie zasobami, rejestrem itd.) – Łączenie wielu języków w jednym projekcie (język → narzędzie) – Wydajność – kod nie jest interpretowany, a kompilowany podczas wykonania (JIT – just-in- time) Platforma .NET - komponenty ● .NET Framework class library – Kompleksowa, zorientowana obiektowo, re- używalna kolekcja typów zintegrowana z CLR – pozwalająca na łatwe pisanie aplikacji ogólnego przeznaczenia: ● aplikacje konsolowe ● okienkowe (WinForms, WPF) ● Web'owe (ASP.NET)
    [Show full text]
  • NET Framework
    Advanced Windows Programming .NET Framework based on: A. Troelsen, Pro C# 2005 and .NET 2.0 Platform, 3rd Ed., 2005, Apress J. Richter, Applied .NET Frameworks Programming, 2002, MS Press D. Watkins et al., Programming in the .NET Environment, 2002, Addison Wesley T. Thai, H. Lam, .NET Framework Essentials, 2001, O’Reilly D. Beyer, C# COM+ Programming, M&T Books, 2001, chapter 1 Krzysztof Mossakowski Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science http://www.mini.pw.edu.pl/~mossakow Advanced Windows Programming .NET Framework - 2 Contents The most important features of .NET Assemblies Metadata Common Type System Common Intermediate Language Common Language Runtime Deploying .NET Runtime Garbage Collection Serialization Krzysztof Mossakowski Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science http://www.mini.pw.edu.pl/~mossakow Advanced Windows Programming .NET Framework - 3 .NET Benefits In comparison with previous Microsoft’s technologies: Consistent programming model – common OO programming model Simplified programming model – no error codes, GUIDs, IUnknown, etc. Run once, run always – no "DLL hell" Simplified deployment – easy to use installation projects Wide platform reach Programming language integration Simplified code reuse Automatic memory management (garbage collection) Type-safe verification Rich debugging support – CLR debugging, language independent Consistent method failure paradigm – exceptions Security – code access security Interoperability – using existing COM components, calling Win32 functions Krzysztof
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Studies of Programming Languages; Course Lecture Notes
    Comparative Studies of Programming Languages, COMP6411 Lecture Notes, Revision 1.9 Joey Paquet Serguei A. Mokhov (Eds.) August 5, 2010 arXiv:1007.2123v6 [cs.PL] 4 Aug 2010 2 Preface Lecture notes for the Comparative Studies of Programming Languages course, COMP6411, taught at the Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. These notes include a compiled book of primarily related articles from the Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia [24], as well as Comparative Programming Languages book [7] and other resources, including our own. The original notes were compiled by Dr. Paquet [14] 3 4 Contents 1 Brief History and Genealogy of Programming Languages 7 1.1 Introduction . 7 1.1.1 Subreferences . 7 1.2 History . 7 1.2.1 Pre-computer era . 7 1.2.2 Subreferences . 8 1.2.3 Early computer era . 8 1.2.4 Subreferences . 8 1.2.5 Modern/Structured programming languages . 9 1.3 References . 19 2 Programming Paradigms 21 2.1 Introduction . 21 2.2 History . 21 2.2.1 Low-level: binary, assembly . 21 2.2.2 Procedural programming . 22 2.2.3 Object-oriented programming . 23 2.2.4 Declarative programming . 27 3 Program Evaluation 33 3.1 Program analysis and translation phases . 33 3.1.1 Front end . 33 3.1.2 Back end . 34 3.2 Compilation vs. interpretation . 34 3.2.1 Compilation . 34 3.2.2 Interpretation . 36 3.2.3 Subreferences . 37 3.3 Type System . 38 3.3.1 Type checking . 38 3.4 Memory management .
    [Show full text]
  • Portable Microsoft Visual Foxpro 9 SP2 Serial Key Keygen
    Portable Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9 SP2 Serial Key Keygen 1 / 4 Portable Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9 SP2 Serial Key Keygen 2 / 4 3 / 4 License · Commercial proprietary software. Website, msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro. Visual FoxPro is a discontinued Microsoft data-centric procedural programming language that ... As of March 2008, all xBase components of the VFP 9 SP2 (including Sedna) were ... CLR Profiler · ILAsm · Native Image Generator · XAMLPad .... Download Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9 SP1 Portable Edition . Download ... Visual FoxPro 9 Serial Number Keygen for All Versions. 9. 0. SP2.. Download Full Cracked Programs, license key, serial key, keygen, activator, ... Free download the full version of the Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9 Windows and Mac. ... 9 Portable, Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9 serial number, Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9 .... Download Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9 SP 2 Full. Here I provide two ... Portable and I include file . 2015 Free ... Visual FoxPro 9.0 SP2 provides the latest updates to Visual FoxPro. ... autodesk autocad 2010 keygens only x force 32bits rh.. ... cs5 extended serial number keygen photo dvd slideshow professional 8.23 serial ... canadian foreign policy adobe acrobat 9 standard updates microsoft money ... microsoft visual studio express 2012 for web publish website microsoft office ... illustrator cs5 portable indowebsteradobe illustrator cs6 portable indowebster .... Download Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9 SP 2 Full Intaller maupun Portable. ... serial number Visual FoxPro 9 SP2 Portable, keygen Visual FoxPro 9 SP2 Portable, .... Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9.0 Service Pack 2.0. Important! Selecting a language below will dynamically change the complete page content to that .... Microsoft Visual FoxPro all versions serial number and keygen, Microsoft Visual FoxPro serial number, Microsoft Visual FoxPro keygen, Microsoft Visual FoxPro crack, Microsoft Visual FoxPro activation key, ..
    [Show full text]
  • Diffsharp an AD Library for .NET Languages
    DiffSharp An AD Library for .NET Languages Atılım Güneş Baydin1 Barak A. Pearlmutter2 Jeffrey Mark Siskind3 1University of Oxford [email protected] 2Maynooth University [email protected] 3Purdue University [email protected] http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~gunes/ AD2016, September 13, 2016 The .NET “ecosystem” Languages The main .NET languages: C#, F#, VB, C++/CLI Around 30 other (somewhat obscure) languages: F*, Eiffel, A#, ClojureCLR, IronPython, Nemerle, ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_CLI_languages 1/18 C# Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2015 TIOBE Index, September 2016 http://stackoverflow.com/research/developer-survey-2015 http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ 2/18 F# An OCaml-based, strongly-typed, functional language, used in computational finance, machine learning Allows us to expose AD as a higher-order API accept first class functions as arguments return derivative functions, which can be arbitrarily nested //A scalar-to-scalar function let f x = sin (sqrt x) //2nd derivative off let f’’ = diff (diff f) // Evaluatef’’ at2 let d = f’’ 2. 3/18 Runtimes Previously: .NET Framework (Windows) and Mono (Linux, Mac OS) Since 27 June 2016: .NET Core 1.0 https://dotnet.github.io/ Open-source (MIT License) Cross-platform (Linux, Mac OS, Windows) 4/18 DiffSharp DiffSharp http://diffsharp.github.io/DiffSharp Deeply-embedded, higher-order, forward and reverse AD Support for nesting, currying High-performance matrix operations (using BLAS/LAPACK/CUDA) Implemented in F#, usable by all .NET languages (helper interface for C# and other procedural
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Proyecto De Fin De Carrera Entorno De Monitorización De Sistemas
    Proyecto de fin de carrera Entorno de monitorización de sistemas informáticos embarcados mediante pantallas táctiles. Versión: 1.0 Creación: Diciembre 2010 Autor: Vicente García Adánez Tutor: Juan Llorens Morillo 1 Entorno de monitorización de sistemas informáticos embarcados mediante pantallas táctiles García Adánez, V. Esta página ha sido dejada en blanco intencionadamente. 2 Entorno de monitorización de sistemas informáticos embarcados mediante pantallas táctiles García Adánez, V. RESUMEN: Este proyecto ha sido realizado para ser presentado como proyecto de fin de carrera en colaboración con la empresa finlandesa Mobile Net Control (MNC de ahora en adelante) con sede en Mariehamn, capital de las islas Åland, provincia de Finlandia, gracias a la obtención de una beca Erasmus para el año 2010. MNC en una de sus áreas provee a sus clientes de ordenadores para sus barcos creando un sistema de comunicación en ellos. Además de mantenerlos funcionando correctamente se encarga de que la información y configuración en los equipos no se pierda y para ello realiza a través de internet copias de seguridad de sus archivos. Como utilidad para sus barcos ha creído conveniente desarrollar una aplicación software fácil e intuitiva desde la que se pueda monitorizar el estado de los ordenadores que pueda tener su barco. Ésta se encargará de comprobar que funcionan correctamente y en caso de que no lo hagan ayudará a solucionarlo. El objetivo de este proyecto es por tanto la realización de una aplicación para pantalla táctil que permita monitorizar el estado de diferentes componentes en un barco desde el lugar donde esté instalada. Su uso está destinado a la persona responsable de este cometido, que bien puede ser un capitán como cualquier otra persona del barco no relacionada con la informática.
    [Show full text]
  • Yohan J. Rodríguez Viveros
    Yohan J. Rodríguez Viveros Living in: Hermosillo, Sonora. México Email: [email protected] Blog: https://www.hasdid.com Skype: yohan.jasdid Profile 15 Years experience in software development. Use of multiple technologies and tools. Passionate about code and science. Book/Article writer and researcher. Always looking for interesting problems to solve. Full-Stack coder. Always learning technologies to contribute code in desktop/web applications, back-end, front-end, web/local/cloud services, Api’s and scientific computing Employment History Developer IV Tiempo Development Sep 2015 - Present | Hermosillo, Sonora Developer of a security company product. Development and maintenance of the system features, releases, policy deployment, support to customers, documentation and platform infrastructure. Main responsibil- ities include: Development and maintenance of the system features like Database support. Consists in the ability to scan database products of multiple types like Oracle, MS SQL Server, MySQL and DB2 to execute stan- dard security policies against those databases to discover and re-mediate security issues. Platforms support. Consists in the ability to scan multiple operating system like multiple versions of Windows, multiple types of Linux distributions, multiple types of Unix, OSx and embedded OS devices to execute standard policies and discover security issues. Standard security policies includes DISA, CIS and PCI security standards. Devices support. Consists in the ability to scan multiple types of industrial control systems
    [Show full text]
  • Programming with Windows Forms
    A P P E N D I X A ■ ■ ■ Programming with Windows Forms Since the release of the .NET platform (circa 2001), the base class libraries have included a particular API named Windows Forms, represented primarily by the System.Windows.Forms.dll assembly. The Windows Forms toolkit provides the types necessary to build desktop graphical user interfaces (GUIs), create custom controls, manage resources (e.g., string tables and icons), and perform other desktop- centric programming tasks. In addition, a separate API named GDI+ (represented by the System.Drawing.dll assembly) provides additional types that allow programmers to generate 2D graphics, interact with networked printers, and manipulate image data. The Windows Forms (and GDI+) APIs remain alive and well within the .NET 4.0 platform, and they will exist within the base class library for quite some time (arguably forever). However, Microsoft has shipped a brand new GUI toolkit called Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) since the release of .NET 3.0. As you saw in Chapters 27-31, WPF provides a massive amount of horsepower that you can use to build bleeding-edge user interfaces, and it has become the preferred desktop API for today’s .NET graphical user interfaces. The point of this appendix, however, is to provide a tour of the traditional Windows Forms API. One reason it is helpful to understand the original programming model: you can find many existing Windows Forms applications out there that will need to be maintained for some time to come. Also, many desktop GUIs simply might not require the horsepower offered by WPF.
    [Show full text]
  • NET Reverse Engineering
    .NET.NET ReverseReverse EngineeringEngineering Erez Metula, CISSP Application Security Department Manager Security Software Engineer 2B Secure ErezMetula @2bsecure.co.il Agenda • The problem of reversing & decompilation • Server DLL hijacking • Introduction to MSIL & the CLR • Advanced techniques • Debugging • Patching • Unpacking • Reversing the framework • Exposing .NET CLR vulnerabilities • Revealing Hidden functionality • Tools! The problem of reversing & decompilation • Code exposure • Business logic • Secrets in code – passwords – connection strings – Encryption keys • Intellectual proprietary (IP) & software piracy • Code modification • Add backdoors to original code • Change the application logic • Enable functionality (example: “only for registered user ”) • Disable functionality (example: security checks) Example – simple reversing • Let ’s peak into the code with reflector Example – reversing server DLL • Intro • Problem description (code) • Topology • The target application • What we ’ll see Steps – tweaking with the logic • Exploiting ANY server / application vulnerability to execute commands • Information gathering • Download an assembly • Reverse engineer the assembly • Change the assembly internal logic • Upload the modified assembly, overwrite the old one. • Wait for some new action • Collect the data … Exploiting ANY server / application vulnerability to execute commands • Example application has a vulnerability that let us to access th e file system • Sql injection • Configuration problem (Open share, IIS permissions,
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to .NET, C#, and Visual Studio
    Introduction to .NET, C#, and Visual Studio C# Programming January 8 Part I Administrivia Administrivia • When: Wednesdays 10–11am (and a few Mondays as needed) • Where: Moore 100B • This lab has Windows machines, but feel free to bring laptops • Office Hours: to be announced • Course webpage: http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cse39905 Course Structure • No quizzes, no exams • Roughly 6 projects • Roughly 2 weeks per project • The final project will be slightly longer and more open-ended • Projects will be due at midnight on the night of the deadline • All assignments should be submitted through the Blackboard Digital Dropbox • Late policy: 15% off each day, up to 3 days late Final Project • Your chance to choose your own project • Brainstorming and planning will begin after spring break • Top projects will be entered into the Xtreme.NET Challenge – hopefully there will be 20 top projects :-) • First prize: Xbox 360! • Judges will include someone from Microsoft recruiting, maybe someone from the C# team • More details to come at http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cse39905/xtreme Part II What is .NET? The Microsoft .NET Framework • .NET is a development platform that launched in 2000 • Goals include language independence, language integration, web services • Technologies to promote rapid development of secure, connected applications • .NET components include: • Languages (C#, VB, Visual C++, Visual J#, ...) • Common Language Runtime (CLR) • Framework Class Library (FCL) Common Language Runtime • A single runtime environment to execute programs written in any .NET language • Includes a virtual machine • Activates objects, manages memory, performs security checks, collects garbage • To run on the CLR, a language must adhere to a Common Language Specification (CLS) • A language must also build upon base types specified in the Common Type System (CTS) Languages • Language compilers translate source into Microsoft Intermediate Language (MSIL).
    [Show full text]
  • Luís Filipe Campos De Figueiredo Faceira
    Universidade de Aveiro Departamento de Electrónica, Telecomunicações e 2007 Informática LUÍS FILIPE CAMPOS PLATAFORMA PARA MEDIÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DE DE FIGUEIREDO SERVIÇO DA OFERTA DE BANDA LARGA EM FACEIRA PORTUGAL Universidade de Aveiro Departamento de Electrónica, Telecomunicações e 2007 Informática LUÍS FILIPE CAMPOS PLATAFORMA PARA MEDIÇÃO DA QUALIDADE DE DE FIGUEIREDO SERVIÇO DA OFERTA DE BANDA LARGA EM FACEIRA PORTUGAL dissertação apresentada à Universidade de Aveiro para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Engenharia de Computadores e Telemática, realizada sob a orientação científica do Doutor Paulo Salvador, Professor Auxiliar Convidado do Departamento de Electrónica, Telecomunicações e Informática da Universidade de Aveiro e do Doutor Rui Valadas, Professor Associado com Agregação do Departamento de Electrónica, Telecomunicações e Informática da Universidade de Aveiro o júri presidente Prof. Dr. José Luís Oliveira professor associado da Universidade de Aveiro Prof. Dr. Paulo Salvador professor auxiliar da Universidade de Aveiro Prof. Dr. Rui Valadas professor associado da Universidade de Aveiro Prof. Dr. Susana Sargento professora auxiliar da Universidade de Aveiro palavras-chave Qualidade de serviço, plataforma, web, plataformas, plug-ins, extensibilidade, auto-updates , engenharia de software, distribuição aplicacional Resumo Existe, hoje em dia, uma oferta muito vasta e diversificada de serviços de acesso à Internet de banda larga. Uma questão que se coloca aos Internautas é a da comparação do serviço prestado pelos diferentes operadores. Este trabalho descreve o desenvolvimento e teste de uma plataforma que permite, por um lado, avaliar em tempo real a qualidade de serviço do acesso à Internet dos seus utilizadores e, por outro, fornecer estatísticas globais da qualidade de serviço oferecida por diferentes operadores, possibilitando a escolha informada do serviço de Internet a contratar.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Thesis
    Faculty of Computer Science Chair for Real Time Systems Diploma Thesis Porting DotGNU to Embedded Linux Author: Alexander Stein Supervisor: Jun.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Robert Baumgartl Dipl.-Ing. Ronald Sieber Date of Submission: May 15, 2008 Alexander Stein Porting DotGNU to Embedded Linux Diploma Thesis, Chemnitz University of Technology, 2008 Abstract Programming PLC systems is limited by the provided libraries. In contrary, hardware-near programming needs bigger eorts in e. g. initializing the hardware. This work oers a foundation to combine advantages of both development sides. Therefore, Portable.NET from the DotGNU project has been used, which is an im- plementation of CLI, better known as .NET. The target system is the PLCcore- 5484 microcontroller board, developed by SYS TEC electronic GmbH. Built upon the porting, two variants to use interrupt routines withing the Portabe.NET runtime environment have been analyzed. Finally, the reaction times to occuring interrupt events have been examined and compared. Die Programmierung für SPS-Systeme ist durch die gegebenen Bibliotheken beschränkt, während hardwarenahe Programmierung einen gröÿeren Aufwand durch z.B. Initialisierungen hat. Diese Arbeit bietet eine Grundlage, um die Vorteile bei- der Entwicklungsseiten zu kombinieren. Dafür wurde Portable.NET des DotGNU- Projekts, eine Implementierung des CLI, bekannter unter dem Namen .NET, be- nutzt. Das Zielsystem ist das PLCcore-5484 Mikrocontrollerboard der SYS TEC electronic GmbH. Aufbauend auf der Portierung wurden zwei Varianten zur Ein- bindung von Interrupt-Routinen in die Portable.NET Laufzeitumgebung untersucht. Abschlieÿend wurden die Reaktionszeiten zu eintretenden Interrupts analysiert und verglichen. Acknowledgements I would like to thank some persons who had inuence and supported me in my work.
    [Show full text]