FOLIA ENTOMOLOGICA HUNGARICA ROVARTANI KÖZLEMÉNYEK Volume 72 2011 Pp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FOLIA ENTOMOLOGICA HUNGARICA ROVARTANI KÖZLEMÉNYEK Volume 72 2011 Pp FOLIA ENTOMOLOGICA HUNGARICA ROVARTANI KÖZLEMÉNYEK Volume 72 2011 pp. 17−30 Redescription of Phylloxerina populi (del Guercio) (Hemiptera: Phylloxeroidea) with notes on other aphids of Hungary G. RIPKA Central Agricultural Office, Directorate of Plant Protection, Soil Conservation and Agri-environment, Department of Pest Management Development and Coordination, H-1118 Budapest, Budaörsi út 141–145, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] – Phylloxerina populi (DEL GUERCIO, 1900) was collected from Populus × canes- cens and Populus alba, and is redescribed and illustrated. On P. × canescens this species pro- duces wax and lives in bark crevices, on branches under the scales of dead females of Chionaspis salicis (LINNAEUS, 1758), and in the edge of wounds. On P. alba it was found in woody bud and stem galls caused by Aceria populi (NALEPA, 1890). Differential diagnosis is provided to the three Phylloxerina species known from Hungary. Amphorophora gei (BÖRNER, 1939) and Phylloxera foaae BÖRNER, 1909 are new species for the fauna of Hun- gary. New faunistic data on some aphid taxa from this country are given. With 25 figures. – Phylloxeridae, Phylloxerina, morphology, gray poplar, white poplar, Hun- gary. INTRODUCTION The superfamily Phylloxeroidea (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) con- tains two extant families of aphids, the Phylloxeridae and Adelgidae. The family Phylloxeridae includes 7 genera, viz. Acanthochermes KOLLAR, 1848, Aphanostigma BÖRNER, 1909, Foaiella BÖRNER, 1909, Moritziella BÖRNER, 1908, Phylloxera BOYER DE FONSCOLOMBE, 1834, Phylloxerina BÖRNER, 1908 and Viteus SHIMER, 1867. According to the last comprehensive books on Folia ent. hung. 72, 2011 18 G. Ripka tree- and shrub-dwelling aphids a total of 1 Acanthochermes,2Aphanostigma, 1 Foaiella,2Moritziella, about 60 Phylloxera,8Phylloxerina and 1 Viteus species live on the families Fagaceae, Juglandaceae, Nyssaceae, Rosaceae, Salicaceae and Vitaceae (BLACKMAN &EASTOP 1994, 2006). They are highly host specific. More than half of the species were described in North America. In Europe all genera are represented by 1 species, except for Phylloxera (8 species) and Phylloxerina (4 species) (NIETO NAFRÍA &BINAZZI 2011). Members of Phylloxeridae are the smallest aphids (about 1 mm of body length) with rather low moving capability compared with other groups of aphids. Only a few phylloxerid species are known from the fauna of Hungary. The presently recognized four genera, Acanthochermes, Phylloxera, Phyllo- xerina and Viteus are represented by seven species, all develop on woody host plants (e.g. Quercus, Salix, Populus and Vitis)(RIPKA et al. 1998, SZELEGIEWICZ &SZALAY-MARZSÓ 2000, RIPKA 2001, 2008). Out of them grape phylloxera, Viteus (= Daktulosphaira) vitifoliae (FITCH, 1855) is a globally important major pest of cultivated grapes. RIPKA et al. (1993, 1998) reported Phylloxerina salicis (LICHTENSTEIN, 1884) from Salix alba, and Phylloxerina capreae BÖRNER, 1942 from Salix caprea and Salix viminalis. In the Fauna Europaea database Ph. capreae is reported from Germany, Po- land and Sweden, Phylloxerina salicis from Estonia, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, Sardinia, Sicily, the Netherlands and France (IGLISCH 1965a), but strangely Hungary is not mentioned. Phylloxerina populi (DEL GUERCIO, 1900) was described from Italy from Populus alba, and has been reported from Moldova (DEL GUERCIO 1900, BONFIGLI 1909, BÖRNER 1952, BLACKMAN &EASTOP 1994, NIETO NAFRÍA &BINAZZI 2011). RIPKA (2001) reported it also from Hungary, collected from gray polar (Populus × canescens). The Hungarian aphid and phylloxerid fauna consisting of 595 species is considerably explored (RIPKA 2008, 2010). From white poplar (Populus alba) no phylloxerid species was reported in Hungary. The larva, embryo and egg of Ph. populi have not been illustrated till now. Folia ent. hung. 72, 2011 Redescription of Phylloxerina populi (Hemiptera: Phylloxeroidea) 19 MATERIALS AND METHODS Continuing the aphid and mite survey on ornamental trees and shrubs of streets, squares, parks, botanical gardens, private gardens, forests and green-belt in all districts of the city of Budapest and in other localities of Hungary new samples were taken from the plants showing the presence of aphid and symptoms of mite feeding. Samples from different woody and herbaceous plants were collected in plastic bags during the growing season in the last two decades. All the plant material was examined with binocular stereomicroscope (upper and lower surfaces of the leaves, petioles, buds, bark, flowers, galls, etc.). Aphids found on the plant were put into vials containing 70% ethyl alcohol. In laboratory after boiling the aphids for some minutes in 70% ethyl alcohol they were put in 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. Insect bodies were cleaned by boiling them again and by pressing them to the necessary extent. Having rinsed the mace- rated animals with distilled water, they were mounted in Hoyer’s mounting medium con- taining sorbitol. Two other methods were also used for mounting. One of them is the resin based mounting method for scale insects. Specimens were cleared in 10% potassium hydroxide solution by boiling them. Then the phylloxerids were stained in equal portions of acid fuchsin, erythrosin, and lignin pink in aqueous solution, dehydrated in a series of graded ethyl alcohol baths and clove oil, mounted in Canada balsam. The second procedure is a mounting method for mites: phylloxerids found on the plant samples were put directly into lactic acid (for 2–4 weeks at room temperature to the desired extent), then placed into Hoyer’s medium. The F-medium (KEIFER 1975) was alternatively used for mounting the specimens. The microscope-slide preparations were dried (for 2–4 weeks) at room temperature, and then sealed with commercial nail varnish (UPTON 1991). Specimens were examined with a phase-contrast compound microscope (Nikon Eclipse E 600), supplied with drawing attachment (Nikon Y-IDT). In order to identify the phylloxerid species works by DEL GUERCIO (1900), BONFIGLI (1909), GRASSI (1912), IGLISCH (1965b), BLACKMAN &EASTOP (1994), also SZELEGIEWICZ &SZALAY-MARZSÓ (2000) were used. For the identification of aphidoid species the books of HEIE (1986, 1994, 1995) and BLACKMAN &EASTOP (1994, 2006) were used. Classification, species and genus names of aphids and phylloxerids were given according to NIETO NAFRÍA &BINAZZI (2011) and BLACKMAN &EASTOP (2011). Terminology and setal notation used in the morphological descriptions are those of ANDERSON &BROMLEY (1987), MIYAZAKI (1987), ILHARCO & VAN HARTEN (1987) and BLACKMAN &EASTOP (1994, 2006). The number of measured specimens (n) is given in parentheses in the body length. All measurements of phylloxerids are given in micro- meters. Measurements and means are rounded off the nearest integer. All measurements, unless stated otherwise, are length. Because some measurements of redescribed specimen could not be made, due to the position of the mounted specimen, means are reported with range in parentheses. The scientific names of host plants were given according to KIRÁLY (2009). Folia ent. hung. 72, 2011 20 G. Ripka REDESCRIPTION Phylloxerina populi (DEL GUERCIO, 1900) (Figs 1–25) Diagnosis – All forms and immature stages are apterous. All virginoparous females are oviparous. Small, light yellow to ochre, oval or pear-shaped body with faceted wax pore plates on head, thorax and abdomen. Cauda and siphunculi absent. Covered with white wax wool in part. Pointed setae on head, thorax and abdomen. Antennae 3-segmented. Short legs, long rostrum. Not visited by ants. Apterous virginoparous oviparous female – Oval or pear-shaped body, broadest ante- riorly 640 (530–697, n = 5), when mounted, 383 (337–427) wide. Colour in life light yellow to ochre. Colour when macerated: pale except for brown legs and antennae. In life waxy sec- retions occur as white tufts on head, thorax and abdomen. Length of wax filaments 40–100. Flocculent wax loosely ties on dorsal surface. Moving females often lose it. Approximately 30% of specimens without wax filaments. Faceted wax pore plates on head also on all tho- racic nota and dorsal abdominal segments, usually with 1, sometimes 2, rarely 3 hairs. Shape of wax pore plates on head and pronotum round, on mesonotum, metanotum and abdomi- nal tergites elliptical. Numbers of facets vary in wide range depending on age of females. Head: Frontal setae pointed, 7 (6–7). Discal setae of vertex pointed, 7 (6–8). Eyes tri- ommatidia. On either side, two wax pore plates fused close to triommatidia, therefore with 2 setae. Head with 23–59 facets in spinal wax pore plates, and 39–147 facets in wax pore plates next to triommatidia (Fig. 13). Antennae 3-segmented 88 (85–95), 0.13–0.16 times body length; first and second antennal segments with 1 and 2 pointed setae, respectively; third segment with 7 setae, small round primary rhinarium without cilia, and 3 minute round secondary rhinaria on apex of terminal segment (Figs 1–2). Setae on ultimate segment poin- ted, longest on apex 7 (7–7.5). Second antennal segments ventroapically bearing single, mi- nute and round rhinariella (or sensillum). Third antennal segment with spinulose imbri- cations. Length of antennal segments: I, 22 (21–24); II, 23 (22–25); III, 41 (40–44). Rost- rum 315 (235–395), usually not reaching anal plate (in ’normal’ rectracted position); apical rostral segment obtuse, 117 (100–130). Ultimate rostral segment (IV + V) with three pairs of primary setae, and a pair of secondary setae, 6 (5–8). 2 apodeme setae, 1–2 (Fig. 4). Rost- rum is in body contact on middle ventral area of abdominal segments. Therefore middle part of thoracic and abdominal ventral cuticular surface smooth, without pattern or imbri- cations. Ultimate rostral segment 2.8–4 × its basal width 34 (25–45), and longer than an- tenna. Fifth rostral segment (V) with 4 pairs apical setae. One pair of them longer and blunt peg-like (rod-shaped) setae, three pairs minute, thin and pointed setae. Thorax: Pronotum with 2 pairs of spinal, 2 pairs of pleural and 2 pairs of marginal wax pore plates in 2 rows (Figs 14–16). Setae on them, of same shape and length as poste- rior setae of vertex.
Recommended publications
  • (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea), with a Revised Checklist of Species Occurring in Poland
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Title: An annotaded checklist of the Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidomorpha) of Poland Author: Wacław Wojciechowski, Łukasz Depa, Mariusz Kanturski, Piotr Węgierek, Karina Wieczorek Citation style: Wojciechowski Wacław, Depa Łukasz, Kanturski Mariusz, Węgierek Piotr, Wieczorek Karina. (2015). An annotaded checklist of the Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidomorpha) of Poland. "Polish Journal of Entomology" (2015, z. 4, s. 383-420), doi 10.1515/pjen-2015-0033 POLISH JOU R NAL OF ENTOM O LOG Y POL SKIE PISMO ENT OMOL OGICZ N E VOL. 84: 383–420 Lublin 30 December 2015 DOI: 10.1515/pjen-2015-0033 An annotated checklist of the Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidomorpha) of Poland WACŁAW WOJCIECHOWSKI, ŁUKASZ DEPA, MARIUSZ KANTURSKI, PIOTR WEGIEREK, KARINA WIECZOREK Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, 40-007 Katowice, Poland, e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT. The paper presents a comprehensive compilation of 764 taxa (species and subspecies), distributed over 167 genera, belonging to 17 subfamilies, three families and three superfamilies of Aphidomorpha recorded to date from Poland. The systematic positions of 19 taxa have been revised in accordance with recent changes in nomenclature. The presence in the Polish aphidofauna of Drepanosiphum oregonensis and Coloradoa huculaki, previously included without any distribution data in checklists of Polish aphids, has been confirmed. One species Sitobion (Sitobion) alopecuri is recognized as being new to Poland. At least 44 species (6% of local fauna of Aphidomorpha) are alien to Poland; among them 11 species collected from plants imported or cultivated in indoor conditions are listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Subfamily Eriosomatinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Monophyletic?
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2014) 38: 285-297 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1303-15 Is the subfamily Eriosomatinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) monophyletic? 1,2 1 1, Xing-Yi LI , Li-Yun JIANG , Ge-Xia QIAO * 1 Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China Received: 13.03.2013 Accepted: 09.12.2013 Published Online: 21.03.2014 Printed: 18.04.2014 Abstract: Eriosomatinae, the gall-forming aphid subfamily, traditionally consists of 3 tribes, Eriosomatini, Pemphigini, and Fordini. However, the phylogenetic relationships among these tribes remain controversial, which has made it difficult to conduct further investigation regarding the evolution of galls and host alternations in this group. We analyzed the molecular phylogeny of the subfamily Eriosomatinae, combining sequences from 2 mitochondrial genes (COI and COII) and 2 nuclear genes (EF-1α and LWO). The reconstructions were implemented based on single-gene and multigene datasets through 3 different reconstructing algorithms, respectively; analyses with 5 different out-groups were also conducted. Results revealed a large paraphyletic clade, in which there were 4 out-groups clustering between Eriosomatini and the other 2 tribes. However, the monophyly of the 3 tribes was well supported by the obtained trees, respectively. Key words: Eriosomatinae, molecular phylogeny, monophyly, paraphyletic group 1. Introduction 1994), and it has been proposed that Eriosomatini should The aphid subfamily Eriosomatinae (Hemiptera: be divided into 2 subgroups, as well (Zhang et al., 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Iranian Aphids (Hemiptera: Stenorrhyncha: Aphidomorpha)
    J Insect Biodivers Syst 05(4): 269–300 ISSN: 2423-8112 JOURNAL OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY AND SYSTEMATICS Monograph http://jibs.modares.ac.ir http://zoobank.org/References/43A1E9AC-DBFA-4849-98A3-132094755E17 Checklist of Iranian Aphids (Hemiptera: Stenorrhyncha: Aphidomorpha) Fatemeh Momeni Shahraki¹, Kambiz Minaei1* and Shalva Barjadze2 1 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran. 2 Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Giorgi Tsereteli 3, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia. ABSTRACT. The paper presents a comprehensive compilation of 543 Received: species and 24 subspecies of aphids, within 144 genera, belonging to 15 29 July, 2019 subfamilies, 3 families and three superfamilies of Aphidomorpha recorded to Accepted: date from Iran. Among them, 35 species of aphids are endemic to Iran. 03 October, 2019 Published: 17 October, 2019 Subject Editor: Ehsan Rakhshani Key words: Aphids, Iran, Checklist Citation: Momeni Shahraki, F., Minaei, K. & Barjadze, Sh. (2019) Checklist of Iranian Aphids (Hemiptera: Stenorrhyncha: Aphidomorpha). Journal of Insect Biodiversity and Systematics, 5 (4), 269–300. Introduction Iran forms a large part of the Iranian plant viral diseases (Blackman & Eastop, plateau, and covers an area of 1,623,779 2007). The known world aphid fauna km². It is bordered in the north by the consists of 5262 extant species (Favret, Caucasus Mountains, Middle Asian natural 2019). They are mostly found in temperate regions and the Caspian Sea (-27 m below zone (Baranyovits, 1973). The aphid fauna sea level); in the west by the Anatolian and of Iran and adjacent countries has been Mesopotamian regions; in the east by the investigated sporradically. The first report eastern part of the Iranian plateau of aphids in Iran was presented by (Afghanistan and adjacent west Pakistan) Theobald (1920).
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera, Phylloxeridae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 629: 83–101 (2016) Catalog of Phylloxeridae 83 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.629.10709 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Catalog of the phylloxerids of the world (Hemiptera, Phylloxeridae) Colin Favret1, Roger L. Blackman2, Gary L. Miller3, Benjamin Victor4 1 University of Montreal, Biodiversity Centre, 4101 rue Sherbrooke est, Montreal, Quebec, H1X 2B2 Canada 2 The Natural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences, Cromwell Rd, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom 3 USDA-ARS, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, 10300 Baltimore Ave, Bldg. 005, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705 4 University of Montreal, Classical Studies Centre, 3774 rue Jean-Brillant, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1P1 Canada Corresponding author: Colin Favret ([email protected]) Academic editor: J.N. Zahniser | Received 3 October 2016 | Accepted 22 October 2016 | Published 7 November 2016 http://zoobank.org/F1EFE8AC-3CDA-4153-8865-3CA09D159FED Citation: Favret C, Blackman RL, Miller GL, Victor B (2016) Catalog of the phylloxerids of the world (Hemiptera, Phylloxeridae). ZooKeys 629: 83–101. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.629.10709 Abstract A taxonomic and nomenclatural catalog of the phylloxerids (Hemiptera, Phylloxeridae) is presented. Six family-group names are listed, three being synonyms. Thirty-five genus-group names, of which six are subjectively valid, are presented with their type species, etymology, and grammatical gender. Ninety-four species-group names are listed, of which 73 are considered subjectively valid. This is the last group of Aphidomorpha to be catalogued, bringing the list of valid extant species to 5,218. Keywords Aphidomorpha, nomenclature, Phylloxera, Sternorrhyncha, taxonomy Copyright Colin Favret et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Diversity of Hickory-Feeding Phylloxerans (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) in the U.S
    Species Diversity of Hickory-feeding Phylloxerans (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) in the U.S. by Fredericka Blair Hamilton A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 3, 2019 Keywords: Phylloxera spp., galls, Juglandaceae, taxonomy, phylogenetics Approved by Nathaniel Hardy, Chair, Associate Professor of Entomology David Held, Co-chair, Professor of Entomology Michael Williams, Professor Emeritus of Entomology Alana Jacobson, Assistant Professor of Entomology Jonathan Armbruster, Professor of Biology Abstract During the spring months, hickories throughout the Eastern U.S. become adorned with abnormal growths or galls on the leaf or stem tissue. Many of these galls are caused by phylloxerans (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae: Phylloxera spp. Boyer de Fonscolombe) which are small, cryptic, phytophagous insects that are closely related to aphids. Their galls come in an array of shapes, sizes, and colors and are considered extended phenotypes of their inducer (fundatrix). Hickory-feeding phylloxerans mainly cause aesthetic damage to the trees they infect, but some species, such as Phylloxera russellae Stoetzel, that infect pecans can cause economic damage. Despite their ubiquity and possible economic importance, hickory-feeding phylloxerans have been the focus of few taxonomic studies and have not been studied extensively for over 100 years. There are only 32 described hickory-feeding species in the U.S., and most of the taxonomy is based on collections from a small area around Washington, D.C. In addition to a lack of knowledge about their diversity in the U.S., even less is known about their evolutionary relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12. Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea)
    347 Chapter 12 Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) of the Prairies Ecozone of Canada R.G. Foottit* and E. Maw Invertebrate Biodiversity (National Environmental Health Network) and Canadian National Collection of Insects Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Three hundred fi fty-seven species of aphids are found in the Prairies Ecozone, of which 81 are adventive. The distribution of aphids in the region is determined by the availability of host plants and has been strongly affected by agricultural practices. The faunal elements unique to this ecozone relative to the rest of Canada represent the northern limits of species feeding on dryland shrubs centred in the Great Basin of the United States. Résumé. On dénombre dans l’écozone des prairies 357espèces de pucerons, dont 81sont adventices. La répartition de ces insectes dans la région dépend de la disponibilité des espèces végétales hôtes, qui est fortement infl uencée par les pratiques agricoles. Les éléments fauniques uniques à cette écozone par rapport au reste du Canada représentent la limite nord des espèces qui se nourrissent d’arbustes dans les zones arides du Grand Bassin des États-Unis. Introduction In general, a particular aphid species feeds on a restricted range of hosts, usually constituting a single genus or tribe, but sometimes a single species of plant (Dixon 2005). Furthermore, a number of species alternate between plant species; a perennial (tree or shrub) serves as the overwintering primary host on which sexual reproduction occurs, and a secondary host (frequently an herbaceous plant) is used in summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovering Digitules in Aphidomorpha and the Question of Homology Among Sternorrhyncha (Insecta, Hemiptera)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 683: 39–50Rediscovering (2017) digitules in Aphidomorpha and the question of homology... 39 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.683.10100 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Rediscovering digitules in Aphidomorpha and the question of homology among Sternorrhyncha (Insecta, Hemiptera) Mark A. Metz1, Douglass R. Miller2, 3, Aaron M. Dickey4, Gary R. Bauchan5, Ronald Ochoa2, 3, Michael J. Skvarla6, Gary L. Miller2, 3 1 USDA, ARS, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, c/o Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natu- ral History, E-524, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 168, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA 2 USDA, ARS, Sy- stematic Entomology Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Building 005, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA 3 Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, Florida, 32614, USA 4 US Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. BOX 166 (State Spur 18D)/USDA-ARS-PA-MARC, Clay Center NE 68933, USA 5 USDA, ARS, Electron and Confocal Microscopy Unit, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Building 012, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA 6 Department of Ento- mology, University of Maryland, 4112 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA Corresponding author: Mark A. Metz ([email protected]) Academic editor: Y. Mutafchiev | Received 6 August 2016 | Accepted 21 June 2017 | Published 6 July 2017 http://zoobank.org/014C27B2-D113-48AD-9E73-5D86527BCA2C Citation: Metz MA, Miller DR, Dickey AM, Bauchan GR, Ochoa R, Skvarla MJ, Miller GL (2017) Rediscovering digitules in Aphidomorpha and the question of homology among Sternorrhyncha (Insecta, Hemiptera).
    [Show full text]