K a N S a S C I T Y S O U T H E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

K a N S a S C I T Y S O U T H E KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN 2005 Annual Report Kansas City Southern is a transportation holding company that has railroad investments in the U.S., Mexico and Panama. Its primary U.S. hold- ing is The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, serving the central and south central U.S. Its inter- national holdings include Kansas City Southern de México, serving northeastern and central Mexico and the port cities of Lázaro Cárdenas, Tampico and Veracruz, and a 50 percent interest in Panama Canal Railway Company, providing ocean-to-ocean freight and passenger service along the Panama Canal. Kansas City Southern’s North American rail holdings and strategic alliances are primary components of a NAFTA Railway system, linking the commercial and industrial centers of the U.S., Canada and Mexico. 2005 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Dollars in Millions, Except per Share Amounts, Years Ended December 31 2005 2004 2003 2002 OPERATIONS (i) Revenues $ 1,352.0 $ 639.5 $ 581.3 $ 566.2 Operating income 62.3 83.5 29.1 48.0 Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change 83.1 24.4 3.3 57.2 Net income (ii) 100.9 24.4 12.2 57.2 FINANCIAL CONDITION Working capital $ (106.9) $ 7.8 $ 133.3 $ 29.9 Total assets 4,423.6 2,440.6 2,152.9 2,008.8 Total debt 1,860.6 665.7 523.4 582.6 Common stockholders’ equity (iii) 1,025.1 817.4 756.6 738.8 Total stockholders’ equity (iii) 1,426.2 1,016.5 955.7 744.9 PER COMMON SHARE (i) Earnings (loss) per diluted share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change $ 1.10 $ 0.25 $ (0.04) $ 0.91 Dividends per share – – – – Book value (iii) 13.96 12.92 12.17 12.09 STOCK PRICE RANGES (i) Preferred - High $ 24.00 $ 21.75 $ 20.50 $ 20.75 Preferred - Low 21.45 19.45 16.90 16.25 Common - High 25.71 18.08 14.97 17.35 Common - Low 16.05 12.60 10.60 12.00 COMMON STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION AT YEAR END (i) Stockholders 4,529 4,809 5,316 5,323 Shares outstanding (in thousands) 73,412 63,270 62,176 61,103 Diluted shares (in thousands) 92,741 63,983 61,725 62,318 (i) The information included in this table of KCS’s financial highlights includes only the continuing operations of the Company unless otherwise indicated. Certain information has been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Common share and per share information have been restated for all periods presented to reflect the spin-off of Stilwell Financial Inc. (“Stilwell”) on July 12, 2000, as well as the one-for-two reverse stock split effective July 12, 2000. (ii) Net income for 2003 and 2001 includes an $8.9 million benefit and a $0.4 million charge, respectively, for the cumulative effect of accounting change. (iii) Total stockholders' equity restated for prior period adjustment through 2002. 1 LETTER TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS In 1887, Arthur Stilwell founded the railroad company which was to become Kansas City Southern (KCS). Unlike the 19th century business moguls who built predominantly east-west oriented railroads, Stilwell envisioned a railroad operating on a north-south axis Michael R. Haverty Chairman, President from the U.S. heartland to the Gulf of Mexico. He was & Chief Executive Officer Kansas City Southern successful in achieving this dream by building a railroad from Kansas City to Port Arthur, Texas, on the Gulf. A Century-Old Arthur L. Shoener President & Chief Executive Officer The Kansas City Southern Railway Company; Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer Kansas City Southern 2 Later, he envisioned a railroad from could not be achieved unless the U.S. and Mexican railroads functioned as a single entity under common control. To Kansas City all the way to a Pacifi c maximize the potential of the joint enterprise, it was imperative to seek out cross-border business opportunities. Separately, Ocean port on the coast of Mexico. KCSR and TFM were essentially mid-haul railroads with lengths That part of Stilwell’s dream remained dormant until 1995 when of hauls in the 500 mile range. Only by working together could Mexico announced its intention to privatize its primary rail lines. hauls be extended to 1,000 to 2,000 miles or more. Unfortunately, In anticipation of this, KCS and Grupo TMM, S.A. de C.V. (Grupo a joint venture arrangement was not conducive to promoting TMM) formed a joint venture for the express purpose of pursuing these opportunities. As a result, the growth of traffi c over ownership of Mexico’s premier rail property, the Northeast Line. the separate railroads lagged far behind the market potential. In 1995, KCS also became a 49% owner of the Texas Mexican Concluding that the enormous potential of the U.S.-Mexican Railway (Tex Mex), the connection between The Kansas City rail line could be unlocked only through a single ownership, Southern Railway Company (KCSR) and the Northeast Mexican Kansas City Southern’s management essentially returned to Dream Realized railroad at Laredo, Texas. After conducting an exhaustive study Stilwell’s century-old dream of creating a railroad stretching of the Mexican freight transportation market, the partners from Kansas City through Mexico to a Pacifi c Coast port. submitted an aggressive bid, and in late 1996 were notifi ed by The process of putting the three railroads together under a the Mexican government that they had won the rights to the single owner and operator has been extensively chronicled. Northeast concession. In June 1997, Transportacion Ferrovaria It was at times diffi cult and frustrating, but throughout the Mexicana S.A. de C.V. (TFM) began commercial operation. multi-year process KCS management remained steadfast in In large part due to a pent-up demand for reliable rail service its determination to create a seamless railroad network. in Mexico, TFM was successful right out of the gate, with Negotiations between the two owners to combine the railroads revenues growing in the double digits during the fi rst few years. began in 2002, which resulted in the fi rst TFM acquisition Because of years of unreliable performance prior to privatization, agreement announced in April 2003. Differences soon arose the percentage of total inter-city freight tonnage handled by Mexi- between the partners, which led to delays, further negotiations, can railroads was a paltry 12%, compared to U.S. railroads, legal proceedings, and arbitration. Finally, in December 2004, which at that time handled approximately 40% of the U.S. an amended TFM acquisition agreement was signed, setting freight tonnage. By providing an improved service product, the stage for KCS to become the owner and operator of TFM immediately began to increase its market share. the combined rail system. This, in turn, led directly to three milestone events in 2005. Nevertheless, even in the early days of TFM’s operations, KCS management recognized the full potential of the investment 3 First, on January 1, Mexrail, Inc., the holding company for the Tex Mex, was con- THREE solidated into KCS. Second, on April 1, KCS acquired Grupo TMM’s shares of Grupo MILESTONE Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (Grupo TFM), making KCS the majority owner of TFM. And, third, on September 12, KCS and the Mexican Government EVENTS resolved a number of longstanding disputes, which resulted in a settlement that gave KCS full control of TFM. In December 2005, KCS changed the name of its Mexican OCCURED subsidiary from TFM to Kansas City Southern de México (KCSM) to better position it IN 2005 as an integral component of the total KCS international rail network. As a result of these momentous events, the KCS dream, and Arthur Stilwell’s vision, was realized. More than a century after Stilwell gave birth to his dream of a railroad connecting the U.S. heartland with key commercial centers and a Pacifi c port in Mexico, Kansas City Southern has put just such a network together. Fulfi llment of this long-sought-after vision validates the prodigious efforts of generations of KCS people who tirelessly fought to ensure the survival of KCS as an independent company. Where many looked at KCS as an anachronism destined to be swallowed up by the seemingly more viable giants surrounding it, the KCS people saw the potential of their company and dedicated themselves to its survival and expansion. Without the dedication and unswerving commitment of these people, the milestone events of 2005 would not have taken place. Achieving sole ownership of the combined network also validates the resolve of KCS management and its Board of Directors. While the Company always enjoyed the sup- port of a loyal group of shareholders who understood its potential, many within the fi nancial community and transportation industry questioned whether KCS would, or even should, survive. The questioning became even more intense as investors watched the railroad industry undergo widespread consolidations in the 1990s. With full aware- ness of these concerns, management and the Board carefully studied alternatives before deciding in 1995 to pursue a course of continued independence and expansion. Once the decision was made, there was no wavering. Through periods of success and frustration, management never strayed from its strategic goals and constantly strove to deliver on its promises. Finally, in 2005, KCS was able to pull off an accomplishment with historic implications within the transportation industry. The Stilwell dream, the KCS dream, of a railroad from the middle of the United States to the heart of Mexico and beyond had been realized. 4 5 THE ROAD AHEAD – A NEW VISION IS BORN But the story does not end there – not by a long shot.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 246/Wednesday, December 26
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Notices 66335 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to governmental 20423–0001) or by calling OEA at (202) Lakeville Line also includes the 0.1-mile agencies) have been met. 245–0305. Assistance for the hearing segment of track known as the Cannon As a condition to this exemption, any impaired is available through the Falls Branch between CP milepost 0.00 employee adversely affected by the Federal Information Relay Service at and CP milepost 0.10 at Northfield. The abandonment shall be protected under (800) 877–8339. Comments on Eagandale Line extends approximately Oregon Short Line Railroad— environmental and historic preservation 12 miles from UP milepost 332.05 at Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch matters must be filed within 15 days Rosemount through UP milepost 333.85 Between Firth & Ammon, in Bingham & after the EA becomes available to the (CP milepost 150.80) to CP milepost Bonneville Counties, Idaho, 360 I.C.C. public. 160.70 at Eagan. The Faribault Line 91 (1979). To address whether this Environmental, historic preservation, extends for approximately nine miles condition adequately protects affected public use, or trail use/rail banking between UP milepost 300.50 2 at employees, a petition for partial conditions will be imposed, where Faribault and UP milepost 309.69 at revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) appropriate, in a subsequent decision. Northfield. According to PGR, DM&E must be filed. Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR owns the Faribault Line from Comus to Provided no formal expression of 1152.29(e)(2), CSXT shall file a notice of Faribault, and Soo Line owns the intent to file an offer of financial consummation with the Board to signify Faribault Line from Comus to assistance (OFA) has been received,1 that it has exercised the authority Northfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 Get a Document
    Get a Document - by Citation - 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30165 Page 1 of 7 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30165, * SIEMENS TRANSFORMADORES S.A. de C.V., Plaintiff, v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, d/b/a CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY, Defendant. No. 10 C 3750 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30165 March 7, 2012, Decided March 7, 2012, Filed SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Reconsideration denied by Siemens Transformadores S.A. de C.V. v. Soo Line R.R. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73556 (N.D. Ill., May 29, 2012) CORE TERMS: carrier, Carmack Amendment, transformer, shipper, affirmative defense, transportation, bill of lading, intermediary, transport, shipment, summary judgment, contracted, notice, trucking, reasonable opportunity, partial, genuine, customer, power transformers, limitation of liability, cargo owners, transported, freight, broker, cargo, www, com, recover damages, party liability, limit liability COUNSEL: [*1] For Siemens Transformadores S.A. de C.V., Plaintiff: Paul J. Kozacky, LEAD ATTORNEY, Jerome Raymond Weitzel, Jessica Marie Fricke, John Norris Rapp, Kozacky & Weitzel, P.C., Chicago, IL. For Soo Line Railroad Company, doing business as Canadian Pacific Railway, Defendant: Daniel J. Mohan, LEAD ATTORNEY, Alison L Helin, Daley Mohan Groble PC, Chicago, IL. JUDGES: JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW, United States District Judge. OPINION BY: JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW OPINION OPINION AND ORDER Siemens Transformadores S.A. de C.V. ("Siemens"), a manufacturer of power transformers, filed suit against Soo Line Railway Company, which does business as Canadian Pacific Railway ("Canadian Pacific"), seeking to recover damages to a transformer that Canadian Pacific carried between Eagle Pass, Texas and Ayr, Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin
    Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin May 1971: As part of its inaugural system, Amtrak operates five daily round trips in the Chicago- Milwaukee corridor over the Milwaukee Road main line. Four of these round trips are trains running exclusively between Chicago’s Union Station and Milwaukee’s Station, with an intermediate stop in Glenview, IL. The fifth round trip is the Chicago-Milwaukee segment of Amtrak’s long-distance train to the West Coast via St. Paul, northern North Dakota (e.g. Minot), northern Montana (e.g. Glacier National Park) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis June 1971: Amtrak maintains five daily round trips in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor and adds tri- weekly service from Chicago to Seattle via St. Paul, southern North Dakota (e.g. Bismark), southern Montana (e.g. Bozeman and Missoula) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis Chicago-Seattle North Coast Tri-weekly Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Hiawatha Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis 6B-1 November 1971: Daily round trip service in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor is increased from five to seven as Amtrak adds service from Milwaukee to St.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid to the Soo Railroad Line Photograph Collection
    Photograph Collections Home Finding Aid to the Soo Railroad Line Photograph Collection Gjevre, John Soo Railroad Line Photograph Collection, 1905-1993 58 photographic prints Collection number: Photo 2121 History Scope and Content Folder List OVERVIEW Links: Access: The collection is open under the rules and regulations of the Institute. Provenance: Donated by John Gjevre (Acc. 2972). Property rights: The Institute for Regional Studies owns the property rights to this collection. Copyrights: Copyrights to this collection remain with the original creators Citation: Institute for Regional Studies, NDSU, Fargo (item number) HISTORY The Soo Line Railroad was completed in 1893 and brought settlers to North Dakota and Saskatchewan. At that time, it consisted of four main but separate lines: Minneapolis, Sault Sainte Marie, and Atlantic Railway Company in Wisconsin; Minneapolis and Saint Croix Railway Company in Minnesota; Minneapolis and Pacific Railway Company in Minnesota; and Aberdeen, Bismarck, and Northwestern Railway Company (including Ordway, Bismarck, and Northwestern Railway Company) in Dakota Territory. In 1888, these railway companies consolidated into the Minneapolis, Saint Paul, and Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co. The Soo Line Railroad Co. was formed in 1961 when the Minneapolis, Saint Paul, and Sault Sainte Marie Railroad Company merged with Wisconsin Central and Duluth, South Shore, and Atlantic. The Soo Line Soo Railroad Line Photograph Collection, Photo 2121 Page 2 of 3 Corporation Holding Company was formed in 1984 and merged with Milwaukee Road, Inc. and Minneapolis, Northfield, and Southern Railway in 1986. In 1990, Canadian Pacific gained full control of the Soo Line Corporation and in the 2000s, Soo Line was consolidated into Canadian Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum RUG 25 198
    UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD Memorandum RUG 25 198/ TO Director of Compensation and Certification FROM Deputy General Counsel SUBJECT: Red River Valley & Western Railroad Company Employer Status This is in response to your Form G-215 request of July 30, 1987, wherein you inquired as to the employer status of the Red River Valley & Western Railroad Company (RRVW). RRVW has not previously been held to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA). In a letter to the District Manager at the Board's district office in Fargo, North Dakota, dated July 14, 1987, Mr. Charles H. Clay, Vice President of RRVW, stated that the date employees were first hired was "approximately" June 29, 1987 and that the company expects to employ approximately 44 individuals. Mr. Clay stated that the Company would begin railroad operations on July 19, 1987. The length of track is approximately 667 route miles, including 12 miles of trackage rights over the Soo Line. Mr. Clay indicated that the RRVW interchanges with the Burlington Northern Railroad Company at Breckenridge, Minnesota and Casselton, Jamestown and New Rockford, North Dakota; with the Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern at Oakes, North Dakota; and with the Soo Line at Carrington, Oakes and Sheldon, North Dakota. RRVW's major terminal points are Breckenridge, Minnesota; Jamestown, North Dakota; and New Rockford, North Dakota. The anticipated volume of traffic is approximately 20,000 cars per year. On your Form G-215, you stated that Mr. Clay had telephoned the coverage section on July 22, 1987 and had verified that the first train ran on July 19, 1987 as expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 1997 / Notices
    19390 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 1997 / Notices MFL signal generation and analysis reliability of the gas transmission and An original and 10 copies of all methods to establish a baseline from hazardous liquid pipeline pleadings, referring to STB Finance which today's tools can be evaluated infrastructure. Docket No. 33346, must be filed with and tomorrow's advances measured. Issued in Washington, D.C. on April 15, the Surface Transportation Board, Office Then, it will develop improvements to 1997. of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 signal analysis methods and verify them Richard D. Huriaux, K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20423± through testing under realistic pipeline Acting Associate Administrator for Pipeline 0001. In addition, a copy of each conditions. Finally, it will build an Safety. pleading must be served on Larry D. experience base and defect sets to [FR Doc. 97±10196 Filed 4±18±97; 8:45 am] Starns, Esq., Leonard, Street and generalize the results from individual Deinard, 150 South Fifth Street, BILLING CODE 4910±60±P tools and analysis methods to the full Minneapolis, MN 55402. range of practical applications. Decided: April 15, 1997. Task 2 is to evaluate two inspection DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION technologies for detecting stress By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. corrosion cracks. The focus in Task 2 is Surface Transportation Board on electromagnetic techniques that have Vernon A. Williams, Secretary. been developed in recent years and that [STB Finance Docket No. 33346] could be used on or as a modification [FR Doc. 97±10235 Filed 4±18±97; 8:45 am] to existing MFL tools.
    [Show full text]
  • OBJECT HISTORY PROPOSAL – WISCONSIN 101 Soo Line 1003
    OBJECT HISTORY PROPOSAL – WISCONSIN 101 Soo Line 1003 Soo Line #1003 is a 2-8-2 Mikado engine built in March of 1913 by the American Locomotive Company in Schenectady, New York. The name Mikado comes from the Emperor of Japan at the time. Soo Line #1003 is one of ten class L-1 2-8-2 Mikados, numbering from 1001-1010, built for the Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Sault Ste. Marie Railroad, also known as the Soo Line Railroad, to haul freight trains. The locomotive cost $25,654.63 back in 1913. She measures 82 feet and 6 inches long, has 63” driving wheels in the front, her total weight is 246.5 tons, carries 17 1/2 tons of coal and 5 tons of water in her tender. Soo Line #1003 officially retired in 1959 and was donated to Superior, Wisconsin where she was placed on display at a park. Soo Line #1003 worked on the Soo Line hauling freight until 1954 when she was taken out of operation and placed as a standby engine at the Gladstone, Michigan roundhouse. The engine sat until the 1990’s when 1003 Operations LLP bought it from the City of Superior and began restoration to operational condition. The #1003 returned to operation in 1996 doing break-in runs in Minnesota. Today, the engine is owned, operated, and maintained by the Steam Locomotive Heritage Association. Currently on display at the Wisconsin Automotive Museum at Hartford, Wisconsin, Soo Line #1003 can be seen operating photo charters and trips with Santa Claus. Soo Line #1003 is an example of Wisconsin’s railroad history.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rail Industry Overbuilt the Railroad Infrastructure in This Country
    Metropolitan Interstate Committee (MIC) Membership List Keith Yetter, City of Duluth, Minnesota Co-Chair Linda Bruce, City of Superior, Wisconsin Co-Chair Michael Talarico, City of Duluth Peg Sweeney, St. Louis County Scott Keenan, City of Duluth Mike Forsman, St. Louis County (alternate) Roger Gunderson, City of Duluth Bernhard Abrahamsson, City of Superior James Rohweder, City of Proctor (alternate) Peter Moran, City of Superior Richard Kieren, City of Proctor Thomas Fennessey, City of Superior Dan Urshan, City of Hermantown Nick Baker, Douglas County Lynn Lander, City of Hermantown (alternate) Marsha Krivinchuk, Douglas County Tom Brekke, St. Louis County Townships David Conley, Douglas County Earl Elde, St. Louis County Townships Bill Andersen, Douglas County MIC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Membership List Bill Majewski, City of Duluth, Chair Paul King, City of Superior, Vice-Chair Richard Larson, City of Duluth Patrick Carey, Pollution Control Agency Dean Beeman, City of Duluth John Allen, Wis/DOT Marshall Weems, City of Superior Martin Forbes, Wis/DOT (alternate) John Foschi, City of Proctor George Palo, Douglas County David Salo, City of Hermantown Gen. Ray Klosowski, Airports Lynn Lander, City of Hermantown (alternate) John Grinden, Airports (alternate) Mic Dahlberg, St. Louis County Bryn Jacobson, Bikes/Pedestrians Joel Ulring, St. Louis County (alternate) Ray Skelton, Ports Dennis Jensen, Duluth Transit Authority Richard Fredricks, Rail William Croke, Mn/DOT James Manion, Trucking Dennis Johnson, Mn/DOT Arrowhead Regional
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota's Railroads
    South Dakota’s Railroads South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office South Dakota’s Railroads: An Historic Context Prepared for: South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office 900 Governors Drive Pierre, South Dakota 57501 Prepared by: Mark Hufstetler and Michael Bedeau Renewable Technologies, Inc. 511 Metals Bank Bldg. Butte, Montana 59701 July 1998 Revised, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................2 A. Purpose of this Document..............................................................................................2 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................3 2. The Importance of Railroads to South Dakota ...........................................................................4 3. The History of Railroading in South Dakota..............................................................................5 A. Geographical Background .............................................................................................5 B. Establishment and Expansion: South Dakota Railroads in the Nineteenth Century......6 1. Beginnings (1851-1868) .....................................................................................6 2. The Little Dakota Boom and the First Railroads (1868-1873)...........................8 3. Railway Expansion During the Great Dakota Boom (1878-1887).....................9 4. The Impact and
    [Show full text]