DOCSLIB.ORG

GTT Communications, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GTT Communications, Inc Morningstar® Document Research℠ FORM 10-K GTT Communications, Inc. - GTT Filed: March 18, 2014 (period: December 31, 2013) Annual report with a comprehensive overview of the company The information contained herein may not be copied, adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. The user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law. Past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 Commission File Number 000-51211 GTT Communications, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 20-2096338 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Incorporation or Organization) 8484 Westpark Drive Suite 720 McLean, Virginia 22102 (703) 442-5500 (Address including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, par value $.0001 per share NYSE MKT Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No ¨ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ Smaller reporting company (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No Source: GTT Communications, Inc., 10-K, March 18, 2014 Powered by Morningstar® Document Research℠ The information contained herein may not be copied, adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. The user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law. Past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant ( 10,578,970 shares) based on the $4.40 closing price of the registrant’s common stock as reported on the NYSE MKT on June 30, 2013, was $46,547,468. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such officers, directors or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant. As of March 18, 2014, 23,615,566 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share, of the registrant were outstanding. Documents Incorporated by Reference Portions of our definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. Source: GTT Communications, Inc., 10-K, March 18, 2014 Powered by Morningstar® Document Research℠ The information contained herein may not be copied, adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. The user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law. Past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. Page PART I Item 1. Business 1 Item 1A. Risk Factors 4 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 14 Item 2. Properties 14 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 15 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 15 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 16 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 16 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 17 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 27 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 27 Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures 27 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 27 Item 9B. Other Information 28 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 29 Item 11. Executive Compensation 29 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 29 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 29 Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 29 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 30 Signatures 34 i Source: GTT Communications, Inc., 10-K, March 18, 2014 Powered by Morningstar® Document Research℠ The information contained herein may not be copied, adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. The user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law. Past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. CAUTIONARY NOTES REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Our Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which reflect the current views of GTT Communications, Inc., with respect to current events and financial performance. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “could,” “should,” and “continue” or similar words. These forward-looking statements may also use different phrases. From time to time, GTT Communications, Inc., which we refer to as “we”, “us” or “our” and in some cases, “GTT” or the “Company”, also provides forward-looking statements in other materials GTT releases to the public or files with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as well as oral forward-looking statements. You should consider any further disclosures on related subjects in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC. Such forward-looking statements are and will be subject to many risks, uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and the business environment that may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results, express or implied, by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause GTT’s actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: • our ability to develop and market new products and services that meet customer demands and generate acceptable margins; • our reliance on several large customers; • our ability to negotiate and enter into acceptable contract terms with our suppliers; • our ability to attract and retain qualified management and other personnel; • competition in the industry in which we do business; • failure of the third-party communications networks on which we depend; • legislation or regulatory environments, requirements or changes adversely affecting the businesses in which we are engaged; • our ability to maintain our databases, management systems and other intellectual property; • our ability to maintain adequate liquidity and produce sufficient cash flow to fund our capital expenditures and debt service; • our ability to obtain capital to grow our business; • technological developments and changes in the industry; • our ability to complete acquisitions or divestures and to integrate any business or operation acquired; and • general economic conditions. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual future results to differ materially from those projected or contemplated in the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included herein attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable laws and regulations, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this annual report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hacking the Master Switch? the Role of Infrastructure in Google's
    Hacking the Master Switch? The Role of Infrastructure in Google’s Network Neutrality Strategy in the 2000s by John Harris Stevenson A thesis submitteD in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information University of Toronto © Copyright by John Harris Stevenson 2017 Hacking the Master Switch? The Role of Infrastructure in Google’s Network Neutrality Strategy in the 2000s John Harris Stevenson Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information University of Toronto 2017 Abstract During most of the decade of the 2000s, global Internet company Google Inc. was one of the most prominent public champions of the notion of network neutrality, the network design principle conceived by Tim Wu that all Internet traffic should be treated equally by network operators. However, in 2010, following a series of joint policy statements on network neutrality with telecommunications giant Verizon, Google fell nearly silent on the issue, despite Wu arguing that a neutral Internet was vital to Google’s survival. During this period, Google engaged in a massive expansion of its services and technical infrastructure. My research examines the influence of Google’s systems and service offerings on the company’s approach to network neutrality policy making. Drawing on documentary evidence and network analysis data, I identify Google’s global proprietary networks and server locations worldwide, including over 1500 Google edge caching servers located at Internet service providers. ii I argue that the affordances provided by its systems allowed Google to mitigate potential retail and transit ISP gatekeeping. Drawing on the work of Latour and Callon in Actor– network theory, I posit the existence of at least one actor-network formed among Google and ISPs, centred on an interest in the utility of Google’s edge caching servers and the success of the Android operating system.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Exchanges: Enabling Local Online Communities
    Internet Exchanges: Enabling Local Online Communities Keith Mitchell Chair, United Kingdom Network Operators’ Forum NOTACON3 Cleveland, April 2006 Outline of Presentation Introduction Internet Interconnect Principles Internet Exchange History Internet Exchange Models Internet Exchange Security Setting up an Internet Exchange Regional Internet Exchanges Speaker’s Background Founder of UK’s first commercial ISP, PIPEX, 1992-1996 Founder and Executive Chairman of London Internet Exchange, LINX, 1994-2000 First chair of RIPE EIX Working Group Founder and CTO of first pan-European commercial IXP operator, XchangePoint, 2000-2005 Chairman of UK Network Operators’ Forum 2004- New resident of Cleveland, OH ! Internet Interconnect Principles What happens at an Internet Exchange Point ? Multiple ISPs locate backbone IP router nodes in single data center operated by co-location provider In-building connections to shared interconnect fabric (using Ethernet LAN switching technology) over point-to-point private interconnections Routing information (via BGP), and hence traffic, is exchanged bi-laterally between ISPs Exchange operator may or may not be same organization as co-location provider Co-location provider will generally have other customers: carriers, hosting, content distributors, NS registries/registrars IXP Advantages • Single large pipe to the IXP more efficient than many smaller pipes to many ISPs ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP IXPIXP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISP = Internet Service Provider IXP = Internet
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    Morningstar® Document Research℠ FORM 10-K GTT Communications, Inc. - GTT Filed: March 27, 2012 (period: December 31, 2011) Annual report with a comprehensive overview of the company The information contained herein may not be copied, adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. The user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law. Past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 Commission file number 000-51211 Global Telecom & Technology, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 20-2096338 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 8484 Westpark Drive Suite 720 McLean, Virginia 22102 (703) 442-5500 (Address including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share Class Z Warrants (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • European Internet Exchange Association 2007 Report on European Ixps
    European Internet Exchange Association 2007 Report on European IXPs Serge Radovcic of Euro-IX October 2007 http://www.euro-ix.net 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1 Foreword 1.2 Internet Exchange Points 1.3 Euro-IX 1.4 List of Euro-IX Affiliates 1.5 Notes concerning statistics 2. IXPs in Europe 2.1 IXPs listed per country 2.2 Number of IXPs per country 2.3 Number of IXPs per city 3. IXP growth since 1992 3.1 IXP growth in Europe since 1992 3.2 Additional and total IXP growth per year 3.3 Additional IXPs per year (non profit versus commercial) 3.4 Overall growth of IXPs (non profit versus commercial) 3.5 Percentage growth of IXPs per year (non profit versus commercial) 4. IXP peak traffic 4.1 Aggregated peak traffic per country 4.2 IXP traffic per country 4.3 Peak aggregated IXP traffic per city 4.4 IXP traffic per city (A - L) 4.5 IXP traffic per city (M - Z) 4.6 Percentage of IXPs and their peak traffic 2 5. IXP participants 5.1 Total number of IXP participants per country (graphical) 5.2 Total number of IXP participants per country (tabular) 5.3 Percentage of IXPs and their number of participants 5.4 Average peak traffic per IXP participant per country (graphical) 5.5 Average peak traffic per IXP participant per country (tabular) 5.6 Number of ASNs present at more than one IXP in Europe 5.7 ASNs present at more than one IXP in Europe 6. European IXP aggregated peak traffic trends 6.1 Aggregated peak traffic history 2002-2007 6.2 European traffic growth over the last 12 months 6.3 Summer traffic trend in Europe: 2005 6.4 Summer traffic trend in Europe: 2006 6.5 Summer traffic trend in Europe: 2007 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit & Peering
    IP Procurement Transit & Peering - Yesterday & Today September 25, 2019 PTC Academy – Bangkok Who Are We? Unitas Global: Provider of connected hybrid cloud solutions for enterprise. Grant Kirkwood: Internet infrastructure, hosting, networking, peering since 1996: • Vision Imaging Internet (hosting) • Mzima Networks (global IP network – sold to PacketExchange) • PacketExchange (global layer 2 network operator – sold to GTT) • Unitas Global (connected hybrid cloud – global network) UNITAS GLOBAL | © 2019 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 2 Terminology Transit Internet access through other ISPs. (Usually “Tier 1” or “Tier 2” ISPs) Peering Two networks that agree to exchange traffic directly, bypassing other ISPs. Routing Table Table of routes for every IP address range on the internet, and how to get to them. Autonomous System Number (ASN) Unique identifier for each network. UNITAS GLOBAL | © 2019 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 3 Transit Internet Access is also called “transit” because your traffic must transit other ASNs (networks) to get to its destination. Destination My Network My ISP Network ASN 123 ASN 456 ASN 789 UNITAS GLOBAL | © 2019 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 4 Transit Generally transit costs money (on a per-Mbps basis). Destination My Network My ISP Network ASN 123 ASN 456 ASN 789 $ UNITAS GLOBAL | © 2019 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 5 Peering Destination My Network My ISP Network ASN 123 ASN 456 ASN 789 $ $ And generally speaking, both source and destination networks are paying one or more ISPs for access to the internet. UNITAS GLOBAL | © 2019 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 6 Peering Peering is when two networks agree to bypass transit providers and agree to exchange traffic directly. Destination My Network My ISP Network ASN 123 ASN 456 ASN 789 $ $ UNITAS GLOBAL | © 2019 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY 7 Peering Destination My Network My ISP Network ASN 123 ASN 456 ASN 789 $ $ In addition to better performance, this can also result in lower cost.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Report on European Ixps
    European Internet Exchange Association 2006 Report on European IXPs Serge Radovcic of Euro-IX October 2006 http://www.euro-ix.net 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1 Foreword 1.2 Internet Exchange points 1.3 Euro-IX 1.4 List of Euro-IX Affiliates 1.5 Notes of statistics 2. IXPs in Europe 2.1 IXPs listed per country 2.2 Number of IXPs per country 2.3 Number of IXPs per city 3. IXP growth since 1992 3.1 IXP growth in Europe since 1992 3.2 Additional and total IXP growth per year 3.3 Additional IXPs per year (non profit versus commercial) 3.4 Overall growth of IXPs (non profit versus commercial) 3.5 Percentage growth of IXPs per year (non profit versus commercial) 4. IXP peak traffic 4.1 Aggregated peak traffic per country 4.2 IXP traffic ranking per country 4.3 Peak aggregated IXP traffic per city 4.4 IXP Traffic ranking per city 4.5 IXP traffic per million inhabitants 4.6 IXP Traffic per million inhabitants country ranking 2 5. IXP participants 5.1 Total number of IXP participants per country 5.2 Ranking of total number of IXP participants per country 5.3 Percentage of IXPs and their number of participants 5.4 Average peak traffic per IXP participant per country 5.5 Ranking of average peak traffic per IXP participant per country 5.6 Number of ASNs present at more than one IXP in Europe 5.6.1 ASNs present at more than one IXP in Europe 5.6.2 ASNs present at more than one IXP in France 5.6.3 ASNs present at more than one IXP in Germany 5.6.4 ASNs present at more than one IXP in the United Kingdom 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Cisco Press Pub Date: October 01, 2003 ISBN: 1-58705-096-X Pages: 240
    • Table of Contents • Index Metro Ethernet BySam Halabi Publisher: Cisco Press Pub Date: October 01, 2003 ISBN: 1-58705-096-X Pages: 240 The definitive guide to Enterprise and Carrier Metro Ethernet applications. Discover the latest developments in metro networking, Ethernet, and MPLS services and what they can do for your organization Learn from the easy-to-read format that enables networking professionals of all levels to understand the concepts Gain from the experience of industry innovator and best-selling Cisco Press author, Sam Halabi, author of Internet Routing Architectures Metro networks will emerge as the next area of growth for the networking industry and will represent a major shift in how data services are offered to businesses and residential customers. The metro has always been a challenging environment for delivering data services because it has been built to handle the stringent reliability and availability needs for voice. Carriers will have to go through fundamental shifts to equip the metro for next-generation data services demanded by enterprise customers and consumers. This is not only a technology shift, but also a shift in the operational and business model that will allow the incumbent carriers to transform the metro to offer enhanced data services. Metro Ethernet from Cisco Press looks at the deployment of metro data services from a holistic view. It describes the current metro, which is based on TDM technology, and discusses the drivers and challenges carriers will face in transforming the metro to address data services. Metro Ethernet discusses the adoption of metro Ethernet services and how that has led carriers to the delivery of metro data services.
    [Show full text]
  • European Internet Exchange Association 2012 Report
    Euro-IX IXP Report 2012 European Internet Exchange Association 2012 Report on European IXPs Bijal Sanghani of Euro-IX February 2013 http://www.euro-ix.net 1 Euro-IX IXP Report 2012 Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Notes on this report ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Internet Exchange Point (IXP) ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 About Euro-IX ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 List of Euro-IX affiliates ................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.5.1 Euro-IX Standard Member IXPs ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.5.2 Euro-IX Associate Member IXPs ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.5.3
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Broadband Strategic Plan
    Northwest Colorado Council of Governments Regional Broadband Strategic Plan 13 December 2013 Northwest Colorado Council of Governments Mid-State Consultants 249 Warren Avenue 1475 North 200 West OHIvey PO Box 2308 PO Box 311 PO Box 1356 Nephi, Utah 84678 Sandy, Utah 84091 Silverthorne, Colorado 80498 (970) 468-1208 (435) 623-8601 (801) 599-4866 www.nwccog.org www.mscon.com www.ohivey.com Northwest Colorado Council of Governments Regional Broadband Strategic Plan Overview OVERVIEW For the purposes of supporting economic development, improving quality of life, and enhancing public safety, the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments will improve broadband in northwest Colorado with strategies that increase broadband capacity, improve broadband reliability, and lower broadband costs. These strategies include: • Policy Efforts The COG will support public policies that enhance broadband competition, lower barriers to new broadband entrants, and encourage expansion of incumbent provider service areas. Some policy effort actions may include: P1 Assisting member jurisdictions to implement broadband friendly policies. P2 Supporting state legislation designed to extend high cost fund support to broadband development. P3 Working to ease state restrictions on municipal broadband projects in rural communities. P4 Developing and supporting primary and secondary revenue generating mechanisms to fund implementation and sustaining of broadband improvements. P5 Investigating the relative benefits of regional franchising vs. individual community franchising. • Knowledge Efforts a | Page Northwest Colorado Council of Governments Regional Broadband Strategic Plan Overview The COG will engage in developing and disseminating information regarding broadband asset availability, broadband service availability, and enhancements to quality of life that can be had through broadband adoption. Some knowledge actions may include: K1 Working with GOIT to improve regional broadband mapping.
    [Show full text]
  • European Internet Exchange Association 2008 Report On
    European Internet Exchange Association 2008 Report on European IXPs Serge Radovcic of Euro-IX 24 October 2008 http://www.euro-ix.net 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1 Foreword 1.2 Internet Exchange Points 1.3 Euro-IX 1.4 List of Euro-IX Affiliates 1.5 Notes concerning statistics 2. IXPs in Europe 2.1 IXPs listed per country 2.2 Number of IXPs per country 2.3 Number of IXPs per city 3. IXP growth since 1992 3.1 IXP growth in Europe since 1992 3.2 Additional and total IXP growth per year 4. IXP peak traffic 4.1 Aggregated peak traffic per country 4.2 IXP traffic per country 4.3 Peak aggregated IXP traffic per city 4.4 IXP traffic per city (A - L) 4.5 IXP traffic per city (M - Z) 4.6 Percentage of IXPs and their peak traffic 4.7 IXP traffic per million inhabitants (graphical) 4.8 IXP traffic per million inhabitants (tabular) 2 5. IXP participants 5.1 Total number of IXP participants per country (graphical) 5.2 Total number of IXP participants per country (tabular) 5.3 Percentage of IXPs and their number of participants 5.4 Average peak traffic per IXP participant per country (graphical) 5.5 Average peak traffic per IXP participant per country (tabular) 5.6 Number of ASNs present at more than one IXP in Europe 5.7 ASNs present at more than one IXP in Europe 6. European IXP aggregated peak traffic trends 6.1 Aggregated peak traffic history 2002-2008 6.2 European traffic growth over the last 12 months 6.3 Summer traffic trend in Europe: 2006 6.4 Summer traffic trend in Europe: 2007 6.5 Summer traffic trend in Europe: 2008 6.6 Categorised and regional IXP annual growth rate comparison 6.7 Regional monthly growth rates 6.8 Categorised monthly growth rates 6.9 Global annual IXP growth rate comparison 6.10 Global monthly IXP growth rates 7.
    [Show full text]
  • European Internet Exchange Association 2010 Report On
    European Internet Exchange Association 2010 Report on European IXPs Serge Radovcic of Euro-IX 25 October 2010 http://www.euro-ix.net 1 Table&of&Contents& & Section&1.&Introduction&...........................................................................................................&4! 1.1!Foreword!...............................................................................................................................................................................!4! 1.2!Internet!Exchange!Point!(IXP)!.....................................................................................................................................!4! 1.3!Euro<IX!...................................................................................................................................................................................!4! 1.4!List!of!Euro<IX!affiliates!...................................................................................................................................................!5! 1.4.1$Euro)IX$Member$IXPs$(Europe)$................................................................................................................................$5! 1.4.1$Euro)IX$Member$IXPs$(Europe)$)$Continued$.......................................................................................................$6! 1.4.2$Euro)IX$Associate$Member$IXPs$(outside$of$the$Euro)IX$region)$...............................................................$6! 1.4.3$Euro)IX$Patrons$...............................................................................................................................................................$6!
    [Show full text]
  • ECIX-FRA PTT MGF (MGF) VUIX ECIX Berlin CIIX NAP-PY PTT Curitiba
    T+e In-erne- (u#ine## L-!. -?a Tibu# Web A%rica .eri#ign B-ROOT $irr 'RA A&amai Tec+nologie# TEL(O *... 4Tele%oni TSSR( - Tele&om Srbi>a *eo-el green.c+ AG ii*e- CAI* Gconnec- '-roo- *S 4RI"E-*CC (u#ine## Connexion )' e!ica-e! Ser0er# L-! Fa#-Ser0er#H Inc. 'E*IC Cablecom S/i##com I"-"lu# In- .ocu# Communica-ion# ACCESS-'E*;A *(' An-enna Hungaria Oracle Rig+-*o/ Wi!eban! *e-/or&# "-8 L-! RET* )TS *... 4)ni-e! Tel ISC F-Roo- Ser0er# $T* ()SI*ESS Scarle- Curacao Limelig+- *e-/or&# $ag8ar Tele&om Google Inc. ALTO*e- LLC 'no,, )#-ream Lan Ser0ice# AG *e-lan-i# $eri- *e-/or& .ox 4 a-a"ro5 "SI*e- .O ACO$ $icro#o%- In-elliHome '/aoo.com (lac&nig+- In-erne- Solu-ion# L-! 'E*;AWE( (CS Grou, Rom-elecom $.$ 4Hungarian "o/er Con0ergence Grou, 4*e-/or&#5 Limi-e! Si#-ema S+8am Tele#er0ice L-! .ir-u-el "-8 L-! *or-+ We#- Elec-ronic# Lane- *e-/or& S&8mar&e- L-! ream Ser0er# L-! X SL (roa!ban! '"* in-erna-ional In-erne- O%%ice o% - )&rainian Telecommunica-ion Grou, L-!. Ci-8com *e-/or&# "ri0a-e Limi-e! Fire*e- ' * *o0o-ron (ri-i#+ Telecom In-ui-i0 L-! ;!ea Tarr .eri1on (u#ine## Win! ISC $-ROOT *S Ser0er FibreLac IX Au#-ralia SA SAFARICO$ ISC ne-,lu#.c+ SA r0a*e- San-a (arbara )-ili- AT=T E$EA E"ICO *e-/or&# Ac-i0e *e-/or& ACI In%orma-ica RI"E-RIS SI$(A*ET Giga*e- ECIT CRELCO$ A%rica In!e,en!en- * Geno-ec Lo--oma-ica .ia-el L-! IGI GGC A$S-IX Caribbean "TT.br Col- Telecom Re!#-one LI*X Rou-e-Ser0er RS3 I"-$ax O,-icon $icro#o%- CIF*e-H Inc.
    [Show full text]