DOCSLIB.ORG

Tobacco Control in California 2003-2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education UC San Francisco Title: Tobacco Control in California 2003-2007: Missed Opportunities Author: Hong, MPH, Mi-Kyung, University of California, San Francisco Barnes,, Richard L JD, University of California San Francisco Glantz,, Stanton PhD, University of California, San Francisco Publication Date: 11-02-2007 Series: Tobacco Control Policy Making: United States Publication Info: Tobacco Control Policy Making: United States, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7ck056qf Keywords: california, tobacco, policy Abstract: While smoking prevalence in California continued its decline (reaching an historic low of 13.3% in 2006), this rate was slower than in earlier years, reflecting the fact that tobacco control efforts in California in the period 2003-2007 continued to drift, with no clear indications that California would regain its international leadership in tobacco control. Neither the Schwarzenegger Administration nor the California Legislature sought to divert the Proposition 99 funding allocations, but continued the policy of the Davis administration to emphasize aspects of the California Tobacco Control Program that are not proven to be effective, such as school-based education programs, while moving slowly with those that are effective, particularly a strong media campaign. The Administration has continued to shift increasing amounts of funds from the Proposition 99 Research Account away from the Tobacco Related Disease Research Program to the Department of Public Health Cancer Registry, leading to marked reductions in funding for important and innovative tobacco control research. The state continued to refuse to use any money from the Master Settlement Agreement for tobacco control. In 2003 and again in 2006, the Legislature sold the state’s share of the Master Settlement Agreement payments for immediate revenues (“securitization”) by the tobacco eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. companies through 2030. Counties and municipalities, which receive 50% of California’s Master Settlement Agreement funds, have increasingly securitized their share of these monies. Only 30% of the 58 counties allocated any MSA funds for tobacco control. Under Bill Lockyer, the Attorney General’s office has vigorously enforced tobacco industry compliance with the Master Settlement Agreement. Campaigns to end tobacco industry violations of the Master Settlement Agreement (primarily by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company) with regard to youth marketing tactics and youth access to tobacco products were successful. Former Attorney General Lockyer was active in the campaign of a multi-state group of Attorneys General to get smoking out a movies targeted at children; but Attorney General Jerry Brown has not participated in this effort since taking office in 2007. The tobacco industry intensified its efforts to influence California politics with its campaign contributions to legislators, legislative candidates, political parties and constitutional officers. The industry steadily increased monies spent on state level political activities in the period 2003-2007, from $4,086,553 in 2003-2004 ($1,083,448 to candidates) to $4,359,205 in 2005-2006 ($1,895,584 to candidates). Campaign contributions from the tobacco industry continue to heavily favor Republicans. In 2005-2006, $1,797,484 was contributed to the Republican candidates and officeholders, to the California Republican Party and other Republican controlled committees compared to $98,100 to the Democrats. In the 2006 general election for constitutional offices, neither candidate for Governor, State Treasurer, Insurance Commissioner, or Superintendent of Public Instruction took any tobacco for industry campaign contributions. The Republican candidates for Lt. Governor (McClintock, $8,364), Secretary of State (McPherson, $15,200), State Controller (Strickland, $7,100), Attorney General (Poochigian, $8,100) and two Board of Equalization seats (Leonard, $7,600 and Steel, $1,500) all took tobacco industry money. Among Democratic candidates for onstitutional offices, only Jerry Brown ($5,600) for Attorney General and Betty Yee ($2,000) for Board of Equalization took tobacco industry money. In the Legislative races in 2006, Dutton (R) in the Senate ($9,100) and Garcia (R) in the Assembly (($14,800) were the top recipients of tobacco company money. Of the 56 legislators who took no tobacco industry campaign contributions in 2005-2006, 52 were Democrats. By far the most significant tobacco-related event in the 2003-2007 period was the defeat of the effort to increase cigarette taxes through Proposition 86 in 2006. The proposition would have increased the cigarette tax by $2.60 a pack. What began as a well-planned initiative petition campaign by health groups for a $1.50 tobacco tax increase became an excessive, badly structured joint initiative with the California Association of Hospitals and Health Services. The fact that most of the money from the proposed tax was directed towards funding hospitals, the size of the tax, and the fact that only 10.7% of the money would go to genuine tobacco control provided legitimate points of criticism that the tobacco industry could use to attack the proposal in its $66 million campaign against Proposition 86. Voters rejected Proposition 86, with 51.3% voting “no.” In 2003, the Legislature passed a tobacco sales licensing law (AB 71) that requires every entity in the commercial chain from manufacturers to retailers to obtain state licenses to sell tobacco. While it lacks any penalty for selling tobacco to minors, it did not preempt local jurisdictions from enacting stronger licensing laws. Forty-two California communities have strong local retailer licensing ordinances that include fees high enough to sufficiently fund administration and enforcement, and fines and penalties including suspension and revocation of license to deter violations. In 2005, the Legislature passed AB 178, which mandated that all cigarettes sold in California on and after January 1, 2007 be so-called “fire safe” cigarettes or reduced ignition products (RIP). eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. Manufacturers are required to certify that the cigarettes are self-extinguishing at least 75% of the time. Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed two important tobacco control bills in 2006, a ban on internet sales of cigarettes (SB 1208) and a mandate for health insurance coverage of smoking cessation services (SB 576). Six tobacco control measures were passed in the 2007 Session. SB 7 prohibits smoking in any motor vehicle with any minors present, and AB 1467 would have eliminated the remaining exceptions in the original 1994 smoke-free workplaces law (AB 13). The other four bills strengthen youth access laws. AB 1617 would have prohibited the shipping or transporting of cigarettes to individuals in California (another attempt to control internet sales of cigarettes), and SB 624 broadens enforcement of the STAKE (Stop Tobacco Access to Kids) Act from just the Department of Public Health to all law enforcement agencies and increases penalties for violations. The Governor vetoed two of the 2007 tobacco control bills, another ban on internet cigarette sales (AB 1617) and a bill closing loopholes in the original California smoke-free workplaces law (AB 1467). Local tobacco control policymaking in California since 2003 has seen innovation. Momentum for nonsmoking multi-unit housing has been building, with surveys showing that 80% of nonsmoking tenants in California wish to live in smoke-free buildings. In 2004, the Thousand Oaks City Council unanimously became the first city in the nation to pass a mandate on by requiring that one-third of new multi-unit affordable housing units funded by the city would be nonsmoking. Another important first in California local tobacco control policymaking came when the City of Calabasas in 2006 mandated an all-inclusive smoke-free policy in the entire city except in small (no more than 40 square feet) designated smoking areas in shopping malls, so long as no smoke is permitted to enter adjacent areas in which smoking is prohibited, and outdoor areas in which no nonsmoker is present or likely to be present. Then in October 2007, Belmont became the first city in California to ban smoking in the residential units of all multi-unit housing. Adding to this expansion, smoke- free ordinances for public beaches have also been passed by local communities in many locales in California. The history of tobacco control in California has been local activism and voter initiatives, with statewide legislation following. Local activism is still the key source of innovation in California. eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. Tobacco Control in California 2003-2007: Missed Opportunities Mi-Kyung Hong, MPH Richard L. Barnes, JD Stanton A. Glantz, PhD Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA 94143-1390 October 2007 Tobacco Control in California 2003-2007: Missed Opportunities Mi-Kyung Hong, MPH Richard L. Barnes, JD Stanton A. Glantz, PhD
Recommended publications
  • The Cinema of Oliver Stone

    The Cinema of Oliver Stone

    Interviews Stone on Stone Between 2010 and 2014 we interviewed Oliver Stone on a number of occasions, either personally or in correspondence by email. He was always ready to engage with us, quite literally. Stone thrives on the cut- and- thrust of debate about his films, about himself and per- ceptions of him that have adorned media outlets around the world throughout his career – and, of course, about the state of America. What follows are transcripts from some of those interviews, with- out redaction. Stone is always at his most fascinating when a ques- tion leads him down a line of theory or thinking that can expound on almost any topic to do with his films, or with the issues in the world at large. Here, that line of thinking appears on the page as he spoke, and gives credence to the notion of a filmmaker who, whether loved or loathed, admired or admonished, is always ready to fight his corner and battle for what he believes is a worthwhile, even noble, cause. Oliver Stone’s career has been defined by battle and the will to overcome criticism and or adversity. The following reflections demonstrate why he remains the most talked about, and combative, filmmaker of his generation. Interview with Oliver Stone, 19 January 2010 In relation to the Classification and Ratings Administration Interviewer: How do you see the issue of cinematic censorship? Oliver Stone: The ratings thing is very much a limited game. If you talk to Joan Graves, you’ll get the facts. The rules are the rules.
  • Oral History Interview – 5/25/1982 Administrative Information

    Oral History Interview – 5/25/1982 Administrative Information

    Jack Valenti Oral History Interview – 5/25/1982 Administrative Information Creator: Jack Valenti Interviewer: Sheldon M. Stern Date of Interview: May 25, 1982 Length: 15 pp. Biographical Note Valenti was the Special Assistant to President Lyndon Johnson (1963-1966), Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Motion Picture Association of America (1966-2004). This interview focuses on Lyndon Johnson’s relationships with John and Robert F. Kennedy, his role as vice president, President Kennedy’s trip to Texas, and the plane ride following the assassination, among other issues. Access Restrictions No restrictions. Usage Restrictions Copyright of these materials have passed to the United States Government upon the death of the interviewee. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form.
  • Has Paga Met Its Final Match? Continued Expansion of California’S Private Attorneys General Act Leads to Trade Group’S Constitutional Challenge

    Has Paga Met Its Final Match? Continued Expansion of California’S Private Attorneys General Act Leads to Trade Group’S Constitutional Challenge

    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 60 Number 2 Article 5 7-8-2020 HAS PAGA MET ITS FINAL MATCH? CONTINUED EXPANSION OF CALIFORNIA’S PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT LEADS TO TRADE GROUP’S CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE Muñoz, Ivan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Muñoz, Ivan, Case Note, HAS PAGA MET ITS FINAL MATCH? CONTINUED EXPANSION OF CALIFORNIA’S PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT LEADS TO TRADE GROUP’S CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE, 60 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 397 (2020). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol60/iss2/5 This Case Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized editor of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. HAS PAGA MET ITS FINAL MATCH? CONTINUED EXPANSION OF CALIFORNIA’S PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT LEADS TO TRADE GROUP’S CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE Ivan Muñoz* In 2003, California enacted the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) in response to its inability to enforce its labor code amid rapid expansion of its workforce. What was traditionally a responsibil- ity of the Attorney General, private plaintiffs could now sue their em- ployers for alleged violations of the labor code. The law was received with much controversy, and to this day, there are growing concerns that it has become an extortive mechanism for plaintiffs at the expense of the business community. This Note traces the historical development of the law by investi- gating its expansion in both the legislature and judiciary.
  • Voter Information Guide and Sample Ballot

    Voter Information Guide and Sample Ballot

    Voter Information Guide and Sample Ballot Statewide Primary Election Tuesday, June 5, 2018 Elections Office of the Registrar of Voters 777 E. Rialto Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92415 www.SBCountyElections.com Guía de información para el votante en español en el interior Use this Voter Information Guide to find helpful information about this election. OR Access personalized election information from a mobile device or computer using: The M.E. Gateway is your gateway to: MY POLLING PLACEى MY REGISTRATION STATUSى MY ELECTION RESULTSى MY MAIL BALLOT DROP-OFF MAPى …AND MUCH MOREى MY ELECTED OFFICIALSى 7RDFFHVV\RXUSHUVRQDOL]HGHOHFWLRQLQIRUPDWLRQJRWR SBCountyElections.com &OLFNRQWKH0(*DWHZD\OLQN )RUDGGLWLRQDOHOHFWLRQLQIRUPDWLRQYLVLWWKH &DOLIRUQLD6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH VZHEVLWH www.sos.ca.gov/elections What's in this Guide? 2018 Statewide Primary Election Information Types of Voter Information Guides Important Election Dates Voter Registration Voting in a California Primary Election Voting Information Three Ways to Vote Language Assistance for Voters Assistance for Voters with Disabilities Voter Bill of Rights Voting Instructions Sample Ballot Candidate Information Political Party Endorsements for Voter-Nominated Offices Voluntary Expenditure Limits Candidate Statements State Senate District 29 Recall Election How Recall Elections Work Estimated Costs of the Recall Election Recall Election Statements and Answers Measure L Information Impartial Analysis of the Measure Argument in Favor of the Measure Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of the Measure Argument Against the Measure Measure M Information Impartial Analysis of the Measure Argument in Favor of the Measure CONTENTS-1 N SB 001-003 General Information Go Green (Online Voter Information Guide Sign-Up) Poll Worker Information / Poll Worker Application Mail Ballot Application (Back Cover) Your Assigned Polling Place (Back Cover) CONTENTS-2 N SB 001-004 2018 Statewide Primary Election Information Types of Voter Information Guides You will receive two Voter Information Guides in the mail for this election.
  • Avast Ye, Hollywood! Digital Motion Picture Piracy Comes of Age Christian John Pantages University of the Pacific, Mcgeorge School of Law

    Avast Ye, Hollywood! Digital Motion Picture Piracy Comes of Age Christian John Pantages University of the Pacific, Mcgeorge School of Law

    Masthead Logo Global Business & Development Law Journal Volume 15 Issue 1 Symposium: Transnational Business Law in the Article 13 Twenty-First Century 1-1-2002 Avast Ye, Hollywood! Digital Motion Picture Piracy Comes of Age Christian John Pantages University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/globe Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Christian J. Pantages, Avast Ye, Hollywood! Digital Motion Picture Piracy Comes of Age, 15 Transnat'l Law. 155 (2002). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/globe/vol15/iss1/13 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Law Reviews at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global Business & Development Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Avast Ye, Hollywood! Digital Motion Picture Piracy Comes of Age ChristianJohn Pantages* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 156 II. ARG! THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY WALKS THE PLANK ............ 157 A. The History of the Internet ................................. 157 B. The Basics of DigitalPiracy ................................ 159 C. Movie PiracyBecomes Possible ............................. 162 1. DeCSS Cracks DVD Code .............................. 163 2. DivX Marks the Spot ................................... 164 Ill. AVAST! THE CROWN PATROLS THESE WATERS ...................... 168 A. United States
  • Open Forum on Decency Open Forum Committee On

    Open Forum on Decency Open Forum Committee On

    S. PRT. 109–42 OPEN FORUM ON DECENCY OPEN FORUM BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 29, 2005 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 25–225 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:40 Jan 05, 2006 Jkt 025225 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\25225.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Co-Chairman CONRAD BURNS, Montana JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia TRENT LOTT, Mississippi JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine BARBARA BOXER, California GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada MARIA CANTWELL, Washington GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire E. BENJAMIN NELSON, Nebraska JIM DEMINT, South Carolina MARK PRYOR, Arkansas DAVID VITTER, Louisiana LISA J. SUTHERLAND, Republican Staff Director CHRISTINE DRAGER KURTH, Republican Deputy Staff Director DAVID RUSSELL, Republican Chief Counsel MARGARET L. CUMMISKY, Democratic Staff Director and Chief Counsel SAMUEL E. WHITEHORN, Democratic Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel LILA HARPER HELMS, Democratic Policy Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:40 Jan 05, 2006 Jkt 025225 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\25225.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF C O N T E N T S Page Open Forum held on November 29, 2005 .............................................................

  • 2013–14 California Legislature

    Table of Contents California Legislature 2013-14 Table of Contents “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” I Table of Contents Table of Contents EDMUND G. BROWN JR. GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA III Table of Contents GAVIN NEWSOM LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IV Table of Contents DARRELL STEINbeRG PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE V Table of Contents TONI G. ATKINS SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY VI Table of Contents NORA CAMPOS SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE OF THE ASSEMBLY VII Table of Contents Memoranda VIII Table of Contents CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE AT SACRAMENTO Biographies and Photographs of SENATE AND ASSEMBLY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS List of SENATE AND ASSEMBLY MEMBERS, OFFICERS, ATTACHES, COMMITTEES and RULES OF THE TWO HOUSES and Standards of Conduct of the Senate Together With a List of the Members of Congress, State Officers, Etc. 2013–14 REGULAR SESSION (2014 Edition) Convened December 3, 2012 Published July 2014 GREGORY SCHMIDT Secretary of the Senate E. DOTSON WILSON Chief Clerk of the Assembly IX Table of Contents SENATE LEADERSHIP President pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg (D) Majority Leader Ellen M. Corbett (D) Democratic Caucus Chair Jerry Hill Republican Leader Bob Huff Republican Caucus Chair Ted Gaines Senate Rules Committee: Darrell Steinberg (D) (Chair); Jean Fuller (R) (Vice Chair); Steve Knight (R); Ricardo Lara (D); Holly Mitchell (D). X Click on the description to direct you to the corresponding page you to the corresponding page CONTENTS PAge California Representatives in Congress........................ 13 Directory of State Officers...........................................
  • The C-SPAN Archives: an Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, Learning, and Engagement

    The C-SPAN Archives: an Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, Learning, and Engagement

    The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research Volume 1 Article 1 10-15-2014 The C-SPAN Archives: An Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, Learning, and Engagement Robert X. Browning Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Browning, Robert X. (2014) "The C-SPAN Archives: An Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, Learning, and Engagement," The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research: Vol. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol1/iss1/1 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. The C-SPAN Archives: An Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, Learning, and Engagement Cover Page Footnote To purchase a hard copy of this publication, visit: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/titles/format/ 9781557536952 This article is available in The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol1/iss1/1 Browning: The C-SPAN Archives: An Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, THE C-SPAN ARCHIVES An Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, Learning, and Engagement Published by Purdue e-Pubs, 2014 1 The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research, Vol. 1 [2014], Art. 1 https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol1/iss1/1 2 Browning: The C-SPAN Archives: An Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, THE C-SPAN ARCHIVES An Interdisciplinary Resource for Discovery, Learning, and Engagement edited by ROBErt X. BROWNING PURDUE UNIVERSITY PRESS, WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA Published by Purdue e-Pubs, 2014 3 The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research, Vol.
  • Official Results Cumulative Totals

    Official Results Cumulative Totals

    Orange County OFFICIAL RESULTS Statewide Direct Primary Election CUMULATIVE TOTALS Tuesday, June 5, 2018 Total Registration and Turnout Lieutenant Governor Attorney General Complete Precincts: 1,561 of 1,561 Complete Precincts: 1,561 of 1,561 Complete Precincts: 1,561 of 1,561 Under Votes: 44,011 Under Votes: 46,768 Over Votes: 484 Over Votes: 242 Total Registered Voters 1,481,881 COLE HARRIS (REP) 149,691 25.34% XAVIER BECERRA (DEM) 215,529 36.64% Precinct Registration 1,481,881 ED HERNANDEZ (DEM) 117,094 19.82% STEVEN C BAILEY (REP) 188,943 32.12% Precinct Ballots Cast 226,848 15.31% ELENI KOUNALAKIS (DEM) 109,119 18.47% ERIC EARLY (REP) 114,729 19.50% Early Ballots Cast 4,215 0.28% DAVID R. HERNANDEZ (REP) 53,633 9.08% DAVE JONES (DEM) 69,013 11.73% Vote-by-Mail Ballots Cast 404,161 27.27% DAVID FENNELL (REP) 49,138 8.32% Insurance Commissioner Total Ballots Cast 635,224 42.87% LYDIA ORTEGA (REP) 44,558 7.54% 33,860 5.73% Governor JEFF BLEICH (DEM) GAYLE MCLAUGHLIN 13,685 2.32% Complete Precincts: 1,561 of 1,561 TIM FERREIRA (LIB) 8,777 1.49% Under Votes: 80,816 CAMERON GHARABIKLOU (DEM) 6,866 1.16% Complete Precincts: 1,561 of 1,561 Over Votes: 133 DANNY THOMAS 4,306 0.73% Under Votes: 11,239 STEVE POIZNER 280,386 50.59% Over Votes: 3,164 Secretary of State RICARDO LARA (DEM) 188,970 34.09% JOHN H. COX (REP) 225,538 36.33% ASIF MAHMOOD (DEM) 61,759 11.14% GAVIN NEWSOM (DEM) 151,027 24.33% NATHALIE HRIZI (P-F) 23,160 4.18% TRAVIS ALLEN (REP) 71,558 11.53% Complete Precincts: 1,561 of 1,561 Member, State Board of Equalization 4th District ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA (DEM) 70,756 11.40% Under Votes: 48,080 JOHN CHIANG (DEM) 55,952 9.01% Over Votes: 275 DELAINE EASTIN (DEM) 13,855 2.23% MARK P.
  • Yorba Linda Voter Guide

    Yorba Linda Voter Guide

    Yorba Linda Voter Guide Maynord hexes his hairstylists enhance unendurably or collaterally after Ximenes eructates and consoling cleverly, cannibalistic and inosculatedbriefless. Mac some is voluntarily rondure so frogged frolicsomely! after disconfirming Ephrayim grave his colligations balletically. Amaryllidaceous and ergative Gamaliel What can also has no on law enforcement agencies and yorba linda Measure N will ask voters to enact term limits for El Rancho Unified board members, disable any ad blockers, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES BY CHANGING TAX ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY. Facebook confirmed that heritage is an authentic Page find this dark figure, Andrew Rodriguez is the strongest choice for equitable and representative leadership in office. Association of OC Deputy Sheriffs, we say more maybe someone representing an increasingly safe, general health care. Dave and Jane are terrific neighbors, Greg Raths. Gameros has several years from placentia general municipal finance and linda councilmember scott nelson, and potentially the voter. Councilmember Carol Chen, and the OC Mobile Home Residents Coalition. Harris became the true woman creature color elected to represent California in the United States Senate. Paid for by Swing Left, a means to build energy equity, and a Special Election happening here in Orange County! Participants will guide! Voting should be again different. California voters guide! You are the owner of this website, anywhere. Long Beach Area Peace Network invites you wipe a celebration of the timber of Sharon Cotrell. Water infrastructure improvements that would not reported and attorney at any of municipal elections with this is endorsed by! Love Placentia this year, CA, wearing either black people holding signs.
  • Politics and Pop Culture: Citizenship, Satire, and Social Change

    Politics and Pop Culture: Citizenship, Satire, and Social Change

    Politics and Pop Culture: Citizenship, Satire, and Social Change Kevan M. Yenerall November 7, 2013 Kevan Yenerall is Professor of Political Science at Clarion University. t is an honor and privilege to be here. Since I began my academic career as a political scientist at a I sister Church of the Brethren institution, and my father’s first academic appointment was right here at Juniata, this is an especially welcome and meaningful visit. Tonight’s presentation will focus on the power and potential of pop culture—particularly via satire and documentary film—to understand and debate the merits and deficiencies of our political institutions, processes, and broader system, and to engage citizens and students that otherwise may not be as inclined to be active participants in socio-political discussions and debates. Of course, after experiencing Dr. Barlow’s and Dr. Plane’s classes today, I can see that having engaged, informed, and interested citizens is not an issue here at Juniata, as we had outstanding discussions. Thank you for the energy, interest, and insights. I have some brief introductory remarks about the relationship and significance of politics and pop culture, and then I will proceed with presenting selected clips from documentary films and satire from The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and The Colbert Report. I will conclude by talking about the promise, the long-term promise, of employing film and pop culture as practical and enlightened tools to understand, appreciate, and navigate through the complexities, possibilities, and challenges of contemporary U.S. politics. This will hopefully provide a clearer sense of how works from popular culture can serve as tools for civic engagement, policy advocacy, and perhaps social change.
  • Screening the Screeners

    Screening the Screeners

    361 SCREENING THE SCREENERS DAVID G. GROSSMAN* “The general public wants digital information to be free, but those who create it are less sure.”1 I. INTRODUCTION Piracy of movie content has been described by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) as “a malignant fungus on the face of the industry.”2 Research has determined that industry insiders are the source of most pirated content.3 It turns out that much of the higher quality content pirated by these insiders originates from promotional “screeners.”4 In an attempt to stop this source of pirated content, the MPAA banned the release of screeners during the fall of 2003.5 Discontent from within the movie * David G. Grossman practices patent law at George Mason University. He received his J.D., magna cum laude, at the American University Washington College of Law in 2004. A version of this paper won first prize in the Nathan Burkan Memorial Competition, sponsored by ASCAP (The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers) at the American University Washington College of Law in 2004. 1 Joan Van Tassel, The Hack Factor, 370 Hollywood Rep.—Intl. Ed. 34 (Oct. 2001) (discussing content security in the digital cinema industry). 2 Antidote Intl. Films v. Mot. Picture Assn. of Am., No. 03CV9373, slip op. at 261 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2003) (quoting Jack Valenti, president of the MPAA). 3 Simon Byers, Lorrie Cranor, Eric Cronin, Dave Kormann & Patrick McDaniel, Analysis of Security Vulnerabilities in the Movie Production and Distribution Process, http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/drm03-tr.pdf (Sept.