DOCSLIB.ORG

Why There Almost Certainly Is a God: Doubting Dawkins Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why There Almost Certainly Is a God: Doubting Dawkins Free FREE WHY THERE ALMOST CERTAINLY IS A GOD: DOUBTING DAWKINS PDF Keith Ward | 160 pages | 01 Apr 2009 | Lion Hudson Plc | 9780745953304 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom Five Ways (Aquinas) - Wikipedia In order to utilize all of the features of this Why There Almost Certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins site, JavaScript must be enabled in your browser. Richard Dawkins claimed that 'no theologian has ever produced a satisfactory response to his arguments'. Well-known broadcaster and author Keith Ward is one of Britain's foremost philosopher- theologians. This is his response. Ward welcomes all comers into philosophy's world of clear definitions, sharp arguments, and diverse conclusions. But when Dawkins enters this world, his passion tends to get the better of him, and he descends into stereotyping, pastiche, and mockery. In this stimulating and thought-provoking philosophical challenge, Ward demonstrates not only how Dawkins' arguments are flawed, but that a perfectly rational case can be made that there, almost certainly, is a God. Find this product and thousands more on ebooks. Bible Software. Books and Courses. Download Logos. Publisher: Lion Books. ISBN: Be the first to rate this. Format: Digital. Add to cart We'll take you to your cart at ebooks. About Keith Ward. Associate Faculty, St. Why There Almost Certainly Is No God | HuffPost Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Richard Dawkins claimed that 'no theologian has ever produced a satisfactory response to his arguments'. Well-known broadcaster and author Keith Ward is one of Britain's foremost philosopher-theologians. This is his response. Ward welcomes all comers Why There Almost Certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins philosophy's world of clear definitions, sharp arguments, and diverse conclusions. But when Dawkins enters this world, Richard Dawkins claimed that 'no theologian has ever produced a satisfactory response to his arguments'. But when Dawkins enters this world, his passion tends to get the better of him, and he descends into stereotyping, pastiche, and mockery. In this stimulating and thought-provoking philosophical challenge, Ward demonstrates not only how Dawkins' arguments are flawed, but that a perfectly rational case can be made that there, almost certainly, is a God. Get A Copy. Paperbackpages. Published August 22nd by Lion Books first published August 1st More Details Original Title. Other Editions 6. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Apr 30, Natalie Vellacott rated it did not like it Shelves: christian-hot-topics. I gave up on this book. The author argues for the existence of God, but accepts that the world is billions of years old. I don't understand how people can do this. If God exists then He is capable of anything and everything including ensuring the Bible accurately represents history. Surely, we have to either accept our limitations as created beings, or deny God altogether and suffer the consequence when He comes as Judge The mental gymnastics required to understand what the author is attempti I gave up on this book. The mental gymnastics required to understand what the author is attempting to Why There Almost Certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins were too much for me. The truth is so much more simple I don't recommend this book unless you want to be confused! View all 17 comments. Jul 18, Mark rated it liked it Shelves: theology. Ward is a philospher and theologian who, in fact, Dawkins misquotes a couple of times in his book. It is quite interesting to see a rigourous mind at work and although his grasp of the philosphical niceties is far and beyond mine he does express himself clearly and concisely. His humour and ribbing of Dawkins' approach is far more respectful and open than that of his opponent but he still manages to make his This was a response to Richard Dawkins' ' The God delusion' which I found quite helpful. His humour and ribbing of Dawkins' approach is far more respectful and open than that of his opponent but he still manages to make his points well. In gently pointing out that in Dawkins dismissing in three pages the work of centuries with his pronouncement of Acquinas' proofs of God as vacuous Dawkins himself is perhaps being a little lazy and failing to actually understand to what the proofs refer is a clever piece of analysis. He is genuinely explorative and seems quite able to handle the fact that perfectly intelligent and morally upright men and women do not share his point of view, this is something Richard Dawkins singularly failed to do. His over-riding point is an obvious one; if you dwell in a universe in which you Why There Almost Certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins to contemplate the possibility that there might be a God, however you may envisage that, then no amount of arguing is going to make a difference. However, if Why There Almost Certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins mindset is such that you are open or at least not totally closed to discovering hints or glimpses of such a possibility then this book could be for you. It is a rational, analytic approach to the God hypothesis. Enjoyable, amusing in parts and, as with Dawkins' own book, i found it thought provoking. View all 9 comments. Jun 17, William rated it it was ok. Reading this book I was reminded of the line in Frasier where his production assistant Ros calls him "the dumbest smart guy I ever met". Reverend Professor Keith Ward is an Oxford lecturer in philosophy, logic and ahem theology with a career spanning decades, and yet he begins by claiming that Why There Almost Certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins is an irreducible feature of reality, and bases much of his subsequent reasoning on this claim. Now to most people, or non-philosophers at least, it is evident that consciousness can be redu Reading this book I was reminded of the line in Frasier where his production Why There Almost Certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins Ros calls him "the dumbest smart guy I ever met". Now to most people, or non-philosophers at least, it is evident that consciousness can be reduced by sleep, medication, injury or afternoon meetings, and "semi-conscious" is a useful term describing a frequently observed state. I am sure that animals such as my adorable cat experience their own existence richly, but they do seem to have a less acute sense than we do of their own personal circumstances, of history, of what is likely to happen next and much else. They can't generally follow TV shows, play video games, take philosophy courses, or in my cat's case, use catflaps. This reduction in consciousness becomes more marked as you go down the scale from chimp to cat no disrespect to ant to amoeba. Of course we can't measure this directly or explain the precise brain mechanisms, which lends consciousness a certain mystery and allows philosophers to speculate about what it all means, but to say that it is irreducible is fairly obviously wrong. Update: Chris pointed out comment 7 below that Ward may be using the word 'irreducible' in a philosophical sense of a basic feature of reality, rather than simply 'incapable of being reduced'. While this would allow semi-consciousness to make sense, I am still not sure what it means as a claim about our natural universe. Did they both Why There Almost Certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins from the Big Bang? Does consciousness really not require energy? Can such a fundamental building block of reality really be discovered only by philosophers with no formal training in physics or neurology, armed with little more than a pipe and an armchair? Update again: Chris has left the building, leaving only gaps from which we can deduce his existence. Ward also jumps straight from the animal brain to his vision of a disembodied supreme consciousness with little more than a cheerful "why not? Where would it store information without cells? How would it recall it without connections? Anyone familiar with Laurence M Krauss' The Physics of Star Trek will recall that the Transporter is far-fetched because amongst other reasons the information storage requirements are so astronomical, not to mention in breach of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The mind of God would suffer the same practical difficulties, with further problems from the laws of relativity and thermodynamics. And while we're at it, the idea that when setting the parameters for the Big Bang, God could predict specific events later on is hard to swallow on several levels. Is Ward not familiar with chaos theory? You can't just set off a complex iterative process and accurately predict what it's going to do, at least not without knowing the starting values to an infinite degree of accuracy Heisenberg problems again and having infinite processing capability. And if God just set it off in the right general direction and then gave things a nudge here and there to keep them on track, how is that possible, especially for a disembodied being? Many people born from the late 20th century onwards won't have too much difficulty in visualising software states that exist in memory at a level above hardware, foreground and background processes coordinating to produce them, and the idea that it can all end when powered down if not saved to persistent storage in a way that can be recovered later.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effective Interreligious Dialogue: the Non-Negotiable Need for Attention to Context
    Spiritan Horizons Volume 15 Issue 15 Article 7 Spring 2020 Effective Interreligious Dialogue: the non-negotiable Need for Attention to Context Marinus Chijoke Iwuchukwu Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/spiritan-horizons Part of the Catholic Studies Commons Recommended Citation Iwuchukwu, M. C. (2020). Effective Interreligious Dialogue: the non-negotiable Need for Attention to Context. Spiritan Horizons, 15 (15). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/spiritan-horizons/vol15/iss15/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Spiritan Collection at Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Spiritan Horizons by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. Spiritan Interreligious Dialogue Forum — Forum Spiritain de Dialogue Interreligieux Effective Interreligious Dialogue: the non- negotiable need for Attention to Context Dr. Marinus Chijioke Iwuchukwu, Ph.D. is Associate Professor and Chair of the Theology Department of Duquesne University. He was awarded his Ph.D. in 2008 from Marquette University, Milwaukee, USA, and joined Duquesne faculty. Dr. Iwuchukwu is Chair of the Duquesne University Consortium for Christian- Muslim Dialogue (CCMD). Introduction In a post- Vatican II world, we are obligated to approach our call to mission and evangeliza- tion and our entire Catholic theology from the prism of the spirit of Vatican II. We are al- ready experiencing remarkable changes in both our encounter with other religions and the way we interpret them theologically. Vatican II gave us not just Nostra Aetate but also Gaudium et Spes and Dignitatis Humanae. Dignitatis Humanae not only mirrors the Universal Bill of Rights but it is also an official endorsement of the thoughts of John XXIII in Pacem in Terris where the pope argues for the protection of the religious rights of every person as well as the equality of all people both in the eyes of civil law and God.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Helen Youth Ministry (6Th-12Th) // Family Ministry Session 3 // REVEAL
    Saint Helen Youth Ministry (6th-12th) // Family Ministry Session 3 // REVEAL Goal The goal of this session is to challenge the teens to ponder the existence of God and provide them with proofs of His existence. Main Ideas God’s existence is philosophical — meaning He can be known through reason. Science can only tell us about the measurable, physical world. God, because He is infinite and pure spirit, cannot be measured by science. God, in His infinite goodness and wisdom, chose to reveal Himself to us in time so that we could know and love Him. God does not merely reveal Himself to us, He also nourishes us and sustains us so that we might experience the goodness of life. KEY TERMS Divine Revelation: God’s communication of Himself, by which He makes known the mystery of His divine plan, a gift of self-communication which is realized by deeds and words over time, and most fully by sending us His own divine Son, Jesus Christ. Natural Reason: The ability to use our human reason, innate and given by God, to determine God’s existence. SCRIPTURE CATECHISM Matthew 6:25-31 §31-35 Psalm 19:1 §36-38 §50-52 Gather Opening Prayer Lord open our hearts that we might seek you more perfectly and our minds to know you more deeply. Bless this time together and send your spirit to direct our hearts and minds. Big Question Video (5 mins) – Found on the Website: www.sainthelens.org/resources-2 as Session 3: Big Questions Video Proclaim // “Reveal” Teaching Does God Exist? One of the biggest questions we will ever ask is whether or not God exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Integral Framing-Analysis of the Online Creation-Evolution Controversy
    “The Numb vs. The Dumb” Integral Framing-Analysis of the Online Creation-Evolution Controversy Tim Stevens (2012) Date: August, 2012 Tim Stevens MSc Thesis MDR (Development and Rural Innovation) COM-80430 MSc Thesis Communication and Innovation Studies Under supervision of Prof. Dr. Noelle Aarts Second examiner: Dr. Ir. Gerard Verschoor, Rural Development Sociology Group Acknowledgements This research was driven by my personal interest and took more than two years’ time. I could not wish for a better supervisor than Prof. Dr. Noelle Aarts. She provided me with the freedom and the trust that allowed me to do this challenging research. Foreword It is hard writing this foreword. The foreword usually describes how the research originated and how the writer, in person, brought about the research and the writing. I do not know exactly how or when this research originated. My mother would say that it all started twenty years ago when I started to ask difficult questions. My supervisor Prof. Dr. Noelle Aarts would say that it started two years ago when the proposal was approved. I remain in doubt. Yet, I am confident that these doubts instigated the inspiration for doing this research, enhanced the impartiality of the process, and augmented the quality of the results. As an interpretive researcher who sneaked on the web and freely quoted disputants to deconstruct their perspectives on the issue, I think it is fair to share my perspectives on the issue, so that you can interpret mine. For me, evolution theory is the most precious theory for humankind. I have no doubts that evolution theory accurately describes how this colourful world came about: Increasingly complex structures of matter turned into life; a world that was made from matter, yet much more than that.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahai-Atheism-Hitchins-Dawkins-Etc
    1 LOGICAL ERRORS IN FOUR ATHEIST AUTHORS: HITCHENS, DAWKINS, HARRIS, DENNETT Identified and compiled by Ian Kluge [email protected] This is a catalogue of some of the representative errors of basic logic found in Hitches’ god Is Not Great, Dawkins’ The God Delusion, Harris’ The End of Faith and Dennett’s Breaking the Spell. Many of these errors are committed over and over again and it would be too tiresome for all concerned to catalogue each instance of each logical error, though this would not be difficult to do. It needs to be noted that the existence of these errors – shockingly numerous as they are – do NOT prove God exists, or that any particular religion is true. What this catalogue shows is that if they want to make credible arguments, atheists must do better than Hitchens, Dawkins, Harris or Dennett. As presented, their arguments are too riddled with logical errors and irrationalities to be trustworthy and convincing. If they are the best atheism has to offer, then atheism has a dim future among thinking people. I. GOD IS NOT GREAT by Christopher Hitchens Note: I will leave Biblical scholars to deal with Hitchen’s errors in regards to Biblical issues. By showing his logical errors, I can only show that Hitchens’ reasoning is not to be trusted # 1: much of this book is an extended non sequitur: proving that God does not exist is logically distinct from God’s nature, i.e. God may be evil but He may exist nonetheless. # 2: It is also a category mistake, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • How the New Atheists Are Reminding the Humanities of Their Place and Purpose in Society
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 The emperor's new clothes: how the new atheists are reminding the humanities of their place and purpose in society. David Ira Buckner University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Buckner, David Ira, "The emperor's new clothes: how the new atheists are reminding the humanities of their place and purpose in society." (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3112. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3112 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES: HOW THE NEW ATHEISTS ARE REMINDING THE HUMANITIES OF THEIR PLACE AND PURPOSE IN SOCIETY By David Ira Buckner B.S., East Tennessee State University, 2006 M.A., East Tennessee State University, 2008 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    [Show full text]
  • Bratislava International School of Liberal Arts
    BRATISLAVA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS BACHELOR THESIS Jozef Majerník BRATISLAVA 2012 BRATISLAVA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO CALL ONESELF AN ATHEIST? AN EXAMINATION OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT ATHEISTIC WORLDVIEW Study Program: Liberal Arts Field of Study: 3.1.6 Political Science Thesis Advisor: Matthew Post Degree to be awarded: Bachelor (Bc.) Handed in: 30.4.2012 Date of Defense: 13.6.2012 JOZEF MAJERNÍK BRATISLAVA 2012 How unreasonable people are! They never use the freedoms they have but demand those they do not have; they have freedom of thought – they demand freedom of speech. – Søren Kierkegaard1 1 Kierkegaard 1987, p. 19. iii Declaration of Originality I declare that this Thesis is my own work and has not been published in part or in whole elsewhere. All used literature and other sources are attributed and properly cited in references. Bratislava, 30.04.2012 Jozef Majerník iv Abstrakt Autor práce: Jozef Majerník Názov práce: What Does It Mean to Call Oneself an Atheist? An Examination of the Atheistic Worldview Názov vysokej školy: Bratislavská medzinárodná škola liberálnych štúdií Meno školiteľa: Matthew Post Komisia pre obhajoby: Dagmar Kusá, PhD., prof. PhDr. František Novosád, Csc., Samuel Abrahám, PhD. Predseda komisie: Samuel Abrahám, PhD. Miesto, rok, rozsah práce: Bratislava, 2012, 51 strán Stupeň odbornej kvalifikácie: Bakalár (Bc.) Témou tejto bakalárskej práce je ateizmus chápaný z filozofického hľadiska. Jej cieľom je odhaliť myšlienkové vzorce, ktoré sa skrývajú pod povrchom ateistického postoja, a tak oponovať populárnemu názoru, že ateizmus je jednoducho racionálny postoj odmietania toho, čo nemôže byť dokázané. Cieľom tejto práce je dokázať, že existuje ateistický svetonázor, ktorý má svoje korene v osvietenskej ére.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Representative Works on the Resurrection
    COMPASS SOME REPRESENTATIVE WORKS ON THE RESURRECTION GERALD O’COLLINS SJ E WOULD COME up with a ted- cise definitions that would pin it down. Rather iously long list if we were to reply it provides the broadest horizon within which Wcomprehensively to the question: we can recognize what human life ultimately what have they been saying about the resur- means, how we should live, and what we can rection of Jesus in the last ten years? In any expect from the God who raised Jesus from case many authors go over the same ground the dead. and do not add very much either to the de- This latest plea for the utter centrality of bates about the resurrection or to the conclu- Easter faith follows earlier attempts to focus sions that can be reached. Hence I have de- Christian thinking and life on the resurrection cided to select nine books that have signifi- of the crucified Jesus. In the run up to the Sec- cant things to say, either positively or nega- ond Vatican Council, François-Xavier tively, about the resurrection and the possibil- Durrwell helped to ‘rehabilitate’ Easter as the ity of Easter faith and hope. This representa- central mystery of Christianity.2 In the tive sample will bring readers into the current postconciliar years some writers, like the Lu- state of resurrection studies. theran Wolfhart Pannenberg and myself,3 tried In presenting these nine works, I do not again to revitalize theology and its various intend to take readers through them in com- specializations by recalling where they should plete detail and provide full-length book re- constantly go to draw meaning, values and ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard J. Di Rocco Science, Philosophy and Theology in the Search for Ultimate Meaning
    Richard J. Di Rocco Consilience, Truth and the Mind of God Science, Philosophy and Theology in the Search for Ultimate Meaning Consilience, Truth and the Mind of God Richard J. Di Rocco Consilience, Truth and the Mind of God Science, Philosophy and Theology in the Search for Ultimate Meaning With Contributions by Arthur J. Kyriazis and Edgar E. Coons Richard J. Di Rocco Psychology Department University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA Psychology Department St. Joseph’s University Philadelphia, PA, USA ISBN 978-3-030-01868-9 ISBN 978-3-030-01869-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01869-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018959105 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Arguments for God by William Lane Craig
    FIVE ARGUMENTS FOR GOD William Lane Craig FIVE ARGUMENTS FOR GOD The New Atheism and the Case for the Existence of God William Lane Craig Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology and Professor of Philosophy at Houston Baptist University Christian Evidence Society christianevidence.org Text copyright © William Lane Craig 2016 Published by the Christian Evidence Society, London, 2016 christianevidence.com All rights reserved Editing and design: Simon Jenkins Cover photograph of the Bramante Staircase in the Vatican Museums by sophs123. Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic license Contents Introduction 5 The five arguments The cosmological argument from contingency 8 The kalam cosmological argument based on the beginning of the universe 13 The moral argument based upon moral values and duties 20 The teleological argument from fine-tuning 24 The ontological argument from the possibility to the actuality of God’s existence 38 Conclusion 42 Notes 43 Further reading 49 Introduction Are there good arguments for God’s existence? Have the so-called New Atheists shown that the arguments for God are no good? It’s perhaps something of a surprise that almost none of the so-called New Atheists has anything to say about arguments for God’s existence. Instead, they to tend to focus on the social effects of religion and question whether religious belief is good for society. One might justifiably doubt that the social impact of an idea for good or ill is an adequate measure of its truth, especially when there are reasons being offered to think that the idea in question really is true.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presence of Christ in the Eucharist: a Strange Neglect of The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Mary Immaculate Research Repository and Digital Archive The Presence of Christ in the Eucharist: A Strange Neglect of the Resurrection? Research Masters in Theology Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick David Kennedy Student Number: 13172921 Supervisor: Rev. Dr. Eugene Duffy Abstract The Presence of Christ in the Eucharist: A Strange Neglect of the Resurrection? Eminent theologians, Gerald O’Collins, Anthony J. Kelly and Luis M. Bermejo claim that a strange neglect of Jesus’ resurrection persists in contemporary theologies of the Eucharist. All three suggest that this deficiency emerges from, and is most evident in, theologies of the Eucharist which are shaped by the insights of classical Christology. This thesis will demonstrate that the narrowness and rigidity of such Christology with regard to the Eucharist, finds its clearest expression in the neo-scholastic manualist tradition. To show how traditional theologians failed to engage with Jesus’ resurrection Joseph Pohle’s dogmatic treatise on the Eucharist first published in 1917, is presented herein. However, while such traditional discourse on the Eucharist prevailed in the seminaries in the early twentieth century, a clear shift soon began to emerge, whereby sacramental theologians on mainland Europe broke away from the narrow approach of neo-scholastic reflection by rediscovering the centrality of the Paschal Mystery to theologies of the Eucharist. This thesis suggests that the break with the neo-scholastic manualist tradition and its treatment of the Eucharist, finds its origins in the writings of the Benedictine liturgist, Dom Odo Casel, whose treatise on the mystery of Christian Worship was published in 1932.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA The
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Threefold Contribution of Gerald O’Collins’s Fundamental Theology: Its Christocentric Outlook, Its Focus on the Resurrection And Its Groundwork for Ecumenism A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By David B. Glasow Washington D.C. 2015 The Threefold Contribution of Gerald O’Collins’s Fundamental Theology: Its Christocentric Outlook, Its Focus on the Resurrection And Its Groundwork for Ecumenism David B. Glasow, Ph.D. Director: William Loewe, Ph.D. This dissertation examines the contributions of Gerald O’Collins S. J. to fundamental theology over the past fifty years, focusing on three interconnected areas of insight: the relationship of history to revelation, the centrality of Christ, and ecumenism and inter- religious dialogue, noting their development over time in his theology. It provides a critical examination of O’Collins’s contributions to the field of fundamental theology— especially his insights into revelation and history, his focused Christocentrism, and his understanding of the relationship between Christianity and non-Christian religions. These interconnected themes form the core of his thought in fundamental theology and draw together important insights from various fields of interest, such as Christology, ecumenism, and Christian anthropology. This dissertation will show how O’Collins’s view of revelation and history informs his Christocentric perspective. Within his Christocentric perspective the resurrection plays a decisive role and opens several possibilities for the ongoing presence of Christ both in time and to all peoples, thus setting the groundwork for O’Collins’s ideas concerning faith and inter-religious dialogue and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • God As “Nothing”: a Metaphysical Recipe Against Anthropomorphism
    GOD AS “NOTHING”: A METAPHYSICAL RECIPE AGAINST ANTHROPOMORPHISM Prof. Uduma Oji Uduma FIIA, MNIM Professor of Law and Logic, National Open University of Nigeria, Abakaliki. [email protected] And Anacletus Ogbunkwu Department of Philosophy, Godfrey Okoye University, Enugu. [email protected]. Abstract This paper aims at explicating the right perspective towards understanding God. Minding the inexplicable nature of God and the ambiguity of human language, this paper opines that God is best described as “nothing” while nothing here does not mean non-existent but indescribable. Using the method of hermeneutics, the paper studies the dynamism of religious anthropomorphism in the quest towards understanding God. In the attempt to actualize the already stated aim, the paper studies the tenets of anthropomorphism, concept of “nothing” in philosophy and how the concept of “nothing” is a better choice than the anthropological language definitions of God as prevalent especially during the scholastic era of philosophy. Our finding reveals that the different anthropological definitions of God demeans the person of God, creates ambiguity in religion and impoverishes human understanding of God which in most cases is the cause of atheism. On appraisal, the paper philosophically assesses the concept of “nothing” as the better definition in understanding God. Hence by “nothing” the person of God is not demeaned, instead He is put in the right perspective as a divine being in whose being cannot be anthropologically understood. Therefore, the implication of the study shows that “nothing” is a better definition of God than all anthropological definitions which are unable to integrate the fullness and perfection of/in God.
    [Show full text]