Analyzing Ancient Egyptian Faience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analyzing Ancient Egyptian Faience THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENTS OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING AND ART HISTORY EXPLORING ANCIENT EGYPTIAN FAIENCE WITH NANOTECHNOLOGY: COMPOSITIONAL MAPPINGS, MICROSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS, AND MODERN APPLICATIONS ELYSSA IRIS OKKELBERG Summer 2011 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Materials Science and Engineering and Art History with interdisciplinary honors in Materials Science and Engineering and Art History Reviewed and approved∗ by the following: Paul Howell Professor of Metallurgy Thesis Supervisor Honors Advisor Elizabeth Walters Associate Professor of Art History Honors Advisor Digby MacDonald Distinguished Professor of Materials Science and Engineering Faculty Reader ∗Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. Abstract This thesis investigated Egyptian faience, an ancient ceramic material that consists of granular quartz or sand coated with an alkali-based glaze. Of interest is the pro- duction process of faience, in particular the raw materials and the glazing method. Previous investigations examined the production process using compositional and microstructural data from ancient and replicate faience. This study confirmed prior results by investigating faience beads produced in Abydos, Egypt during the 22nd Dynasty (c. 940–720 BC). Furthermore, this investigation improved upon earlier works by creating compositional mappings and analyzing previously over- looked parts of faience. Moreover, modern applications for faience technology were explored. i Table of Contents Abstract i List of Figures iv List of Tables vi Acknowledgments vii Chapter 1 Egyptian Faience 1 1.1 Background ............................... 1 1.2 Production ............................... 3 1.2.1 Rawmaterials.......................... 4 1.2.2 Shaping ............................. 7 1.2.3 GlazingMethod......................... 8 1.2.4 Firing .............................. 13 1.3 StateoftheArt............................. 14 1.4 Contributions .............................. 21 Chapter 2 Methodology 24 Chapter 3 Results 29 3.1 BeadSample1 ............................. 32 3.2 BeadSample2 ............................. 36 3.2.1 Sample 2a: Fragment Showing Outer Surface . 36 3.2.2 Sample 2b: Fragment Showing Inner Surface . 43 3.2.3 Sample 2c: Cross-Section . 47 3.3 BeadSample3 ............................. 52 3.3.1 Sample 3a: Bead with Removed Fragment . 52 ii 3.3.2 Sample 3b: Removed Fragment . 61 Chapter 4 Discussion 68 4.1 RawMaterials.............................. 68 4.1.1 Quartz.............................. 68 4.1.2 AlkaliFlux ........................... 69 4.1.3 Colorants ............................ 69 4.2 GlazingMethod............................. 70 4.2.1 Bead1.............................. 71 4.2.2 Bead2.............................. 71 4.2.3 Bead3.............................. 72 4.3 ComparisonwithPreviousStudies. 72 4.3.1 Ancient Faience Comparisons . 73 4.3.2 Replicate Faience Comparisons . 74 Chapter 5 Modern Applications 76 5.1 ApplicationsofSelf-Glazing . 76 5.2 ApplicationsofLowFiringTemperature . 77 5.3 Applications of Antimicrobial Properties . 78 5.4 Economic and Environmental Considerations . 78 Chapter 6 Conclusions and Future Work 80 6.1 Summary ................................ 80 6.2 FutureWork............................... 81 Bibliography 82 Appendix A Academic Vita 85 iii List of Figures 1.1 Examples of faience from the Louvre. 2 1.2 Thethreemethodsofglazingfaience . 9 1.3 SEM photographs of sections through select replicate faience from Tite’s2007study............................. 21 2.1 Photos of some of the faience beads analyzed by this study. 25 3.1 Bead sample prepared for examination. 30 3.2 Naming convention of locations on faience bead . 31 3.3 Sample1. ................................ 33 3.4 Close-up of sample 1, showing its porous nature. 33 3.5 Close-up of sample 1, centered on a nonporous area. 34 3.6 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of a pore on sample 1. 35 3.7 EDS analyses comparing a pore on and an nonporous area of sample 1. The pore analysis is in light blue, and the nonporous analysis is inblack.................................. 36 3.8 Reference image for sample 2 showing samples (2a) fragment show- ing outer surface, (2b) fragment showing inner surface, and (2c) cross-section. .............................. 37 3.9 Sample2a................................. 37 3.10 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of a close-up of sample 2a. 38 3.11 Two different pores on sample 2a. (a) Pore 1 is formed around a glass grain, and (b) pore 2 has calcium deposits. 40 3.12 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of pore 1 on sample 2a. 41 3.13 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of pore 2 on sample 2a. 42 3.14Sample2b................................. 43 3.15 Close-up of sample 2b, better showing the inner surface and body. 44 3.16 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of the faience body of sample 2b..................................... 45 3.17 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of sand grain in sample 2b. 46 3.18Sample2c................................. 48 3.19 Close-up of sample 2c, showing the boundary between the glaze and body.................................... 48 iv 3.20 Close-up of sample 2c, better showing the lack of an interaction layer between the glaze and body. 49 3.21 Close-up of the glaze on sample 2c. 49 3.22 Close-up of sample 2c, showing a different boundary between the glazeandbody. ............................. 50 3.23 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of the glaze on sample 2c. 51 3.24 Reference image showing samples (3a) bead with a fragment re- movedand(3b)theremovedfragment. 52 3.25 Sample 3a, centered on cross-sections of (a) the middle and (b) the endofthebead.............................. 55 3.26 Reference image for the compositional mapping of sample 3a at the middleofthebead. ........................... 56 3.27 Compositional mapping of sample 3a at the middle of the bead . 57 3.28 Reference image for the compositional mapping of sample 3a at the endofthebead.............................. 58 3.29 Compositional mapping of sample 3a at the end of the bead . 59 3.30 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of a phosphorous-rich area in sample3aneartheendofthebead.. 60 3.31 Sample 3b, showing the four locations where compositions were obtained.................................. 61 3.32 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of sample 3b at location α. 62 3.33 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of sample 3b at location β. 63 3.34 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of sample 3b at location δ. 64 3.35 (a) SEM image and (b) EDS analysis of sample 3b at location γ. 65 3.36 Compositeimageofsample3b. 67 v List of Tables 1.1 Average cupric oxide concentrations in faience glazes from Kacz- marczyk and Hedges’s 1983 book. 16 1.2 caption.................................. 17 1.3 Summary of concentration profiles for replicate faience from Tite’s 2007study. ............................... 18 1.4 Average glaze/glass composition for select replicate faience from Tite’s2007study............................. 20 vi Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my honors and thesis advisors, Dr. Elizabeth Walters in Art History and Dr. Paul Howell in Materials Science and Engineering, and Dr. Digby MacDonald for being a faculty reader. Their assistance and guidance on this project have been invaluable. I would like to recognize Ms. Stacy Davidson and Dr. Judy Ozment for their advice and support as well as Mr. Mike Fleck for photographing the beads. I would also like to thank my grandparents Harriet and Herbert Miller for being amazing and supportive of me as well as for providing a warm welcoming home for my friends and me on several breaks. My parents, Eileen and Joe, also deserve credit. I would like to acknowledge my classmates, BS, MP, CE, JL, SC, JS and ZR. Somewhere in between the class work and road trips to Tampa, San Francisco or Chicago, we truly became a family. Finally I would like to thank Klaus Zhang for his unyielding support and love. vii Chapter 1 Egyptian Faience The ancient material known as Egyptian faience bears no relationship to the tin-glazed pottery from Faenza, Italy from which the term originally derived. Because the Italian pottery is now commonly referred to as majolica, this thesis refers to Egyptian faience as faience [1]. 1.1 Background Egyptian faience is a ceramic material that consists of granular quartz or sand coated with an alkali-based glaze [1–5]. Some academics also include similarly glazed steatite in the definition of faience [2, 6]. Examples of museum-quality faience from the Louvre are shown in Figure 1.1. Unlike conventional, clay-based ceramics, the raw materials of faience react when fired to produce a result quite different from its components, making it the “first high-tech ceramic” [7]. The ancient Egyptians refered to faience as tjehenet, from the root tjehen meaning to dazzle or gleam [8, 9]. It was also called khesbed, their word for lapis lazuli and, sometimes, the color blue [8,10]. 2 (a) Box cover on behalf of the divine wor- (b) Servant of the funeral shipper of Amon, Nitocris; of King Seti I; Reign of Psammetichus I (664–610 BC, 1294–1279 BC (19th Dy- 26th Dynasty) nasty) Figure 1.1. Examples of faience from the Louvre (Photographed by Elyssa Okkelberg). This study employs faience beads of a deep blue color that may fulfill an ancient Egyptian interest in having lapis lazuli or the broader interest in colors connected to the sky [11–13]. These beads are provisionally
Recommended publications
  • 2013 EFP Catalog 19 April
    Ephraim Pottery Studio Collection April 2013 Welcome! Dear pottery and tile enthusiasts, As you can see from this catalog, we’ve been busy working on new pottery and tiles over the past several months. While this is an ongo- ing process, we have also been taking a closer look at what we want our pottery to represent. Refocusing on our mission, we have been reminded how important the collaborative work environment is to our studio. When our artists bring their passion for their work to the group and are open to elevating their vision, boundaries seem to drop away. I like to think that our world would be a much better place if a collaborative approach could be emphasized in our homes, schools, and workplaces... in all areas of our lives, in fact. “We are better to- gether” is a motto that is in evidence every day at EFP. Many times in the creative process, we can develop a new concept most of the way quickly. Often, it’s that last 10% that requires work, grit and determination. It can take weeks, months, or even years to bring a new concept to fruition. Such has been the case with frames and stands for our tiles. Until recently, John Raymond was in charge of glaz- ing. As some of you know, John is also a talented woodworker who has been developing a line of quarter-sawn oak frames and stands for our tiles. While we have been able to display some of these at shows and in our galleries over the past year, we would like to make frames and stands available to all our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experiment with Mineral Pigments in a Prepared Frit
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Master's Theses Master's Theses 1951 An Experiment With Mineral Pigments in a Prepared Frit Cecelia Long Central Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd Part of the Art Education Commons, and the Educational Methods Commons Recommended Citation Long, Cecelia, "An Experiment With Mineral Pigments in a Prepared Frit" (1951). All Master's Theses. 56. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/56 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EXPERIMENT WITH MINBi.ALJ:J>IGMENTS IN A PREPARED FRI:r by Cecelia Long A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fiiucation, in the Graduate School of the Central Washington College of Fii.ucation August 1951 i A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education in the Graduate School of the Central Washington College of Education. Approved: Thesis Chairman _____________________________ Dr. Charles W. Saale ___________________________ Mr. Glen Hogue _____________________________ Miss Lillian Bloomer Date:_____________ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Due acknowledgment is made to Dr. Charles W. Saale for assistance with the organization and preparation of the manuscript. My thanks are due to Mr. Glenn Hogue for guidance in preparing and making this experiment. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I Introduction •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 II Delineation of Materials and Review of Related Experiments..................
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis and Reconstruction of Islamic Glass-Frit Ceramics, And
    Article: The analysis and reconstruction of Islamic glass-frit ceramics, and comparative methods of desalination Author(s): Richard Barden Source: Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Volume Three, 1995 Pages: 64-69 Compilers: Julie Lauffenburger and Virginia Greene th © 1996 by The American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works, 1156 15 Street NW, Suite 320, Washington, DC 20005. (202) 452-9545 www.conservation-us.org Under a licensing agreement, individual authors retain copyright to their work and extend publications rights to the American Institute for Conservation. Objects Specialty Group Postprints is published annually by the Objects Specialty Group (OSG) of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works (AIC). A membership benefit of the Objects Specialty Group, Objects Specialty Group Postprints is mainly comprised of papers presented at OSG sessions at AIC Annual Meetings and is intended to inform and educate conservation-related disciplines. Papers presented in Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Volume Three, 1995 have been edited for clarity and content but have not undergone a formal process of peer review. This publication is primarily intended for the members of the Objects Specialty Group of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works. Responsibility for the methods and materials described herein rests solely with the authors, whose articles should not be considered official statements of the OSG or the AIC. The OSG is an approved division of the AIC but does not necessarily represent the AIC policy or opinions. THE ANALYSIS AND RECONSTRUCTION OF ISLAMIC GLASS-FRIT CERAMICS, AND COMPARATIVE METHODS OF DESALINATION Richard Barden The Freer Collection The Freer Gallery of Art has a collection of medieval Islamic glazed glass-frit ceramics, from Raqqa, Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Beginnings of Tin-Opacified Islamic Glazes
    Journal of Archaeological Science 57 (2015) 80e91 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Revisiting the beginnings of tin-opacified Islamic glazes * Michael Tite a, , Oliver Watson b, Trinitat Pradell c, Moujan Matin a, Gloria Molina c, Kelly Domoney d, Anne Bouquillon e a Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK b Khalili Research Centre for the Art and Material Culture of the Middle East, 3, St John Street, Oxford OX1 2LG, UK c Physics Department and Center for Research in Nano-Engineering, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, C/Esteve Terrades 8, 08860 Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain d Centre for Archaeological and Forensic Analysis, Cranfield University, Shrivenham SN6 8LA, UK e C2RMF, Palais du Louvre, 14, quai François Mitterrand, 75001 Paris, France article info abstract Article history: The generally accepted theory is that the demand for Islamic glazed pottery started in Abbasid Iraq in the Received 12 September 2014 9th century AD with the production of a range of glazed wares in response to the import of Chinese Received in revised form stonewares and porcelains. However, Oliver Watson has recently proposed that the demand for Islamic 22 January 2015 glazed pottery first occurred in Egypt and Syria in the 8th century AD resulting in the production of Accepted 3 February 2015 opaque yellow decorated wares. Using a combination of SEM analysis of polished cross-sections, and Available online 14 February 2015 surface analysis using hand-held XRF or PIXE, Coptic Glazed Ware from Egypt, Yellow Glazed Ware from Syria, and comparable wares from Samarra, Kish and Susa have been analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vessels of Life: New Evidence for Creative Aspects in Material Remains from Domestic Sites
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Bettina Bader, Christian M. Knoblauch and E. Christiana Köhler (Hg.), Vienna 2 – ancient Egyptian ceramics in the 21st century. Proceedings of the international conference held at the University of Vienna, 14th-18th of May, 2012 (Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta 245), Leuven ; Paris ; Bristol, CT 2016, S. 85-102 VESSELS OF LIFE: NEW EVIDENCE FOR CREATIVE ASPECTS IN MATERIAL REMAINS FROM DOMESTIC SITES Julia Budka Introduction Figurative vessels from Ancient Egypt have been studied since the early 20th century, but it was Janine Bourriau who first discussed these vases not as works ol art but as an integral part of the huge corpus of Pharaonic ceramic vessels. The excavated examples of such figure vases were predominately found in tombs, as can be illustrated by one of the sub-groups from the 18th Dynasty, so called representations of wet nurses, deriving in particular from cemeter­ ies at Sedment and Abydos.12 The funerary context is also predominant for the group of con­ temporaneous figure vases which is the main focus of the present paper: feminoform vessels with modelled breasts and often plastic arms are well attested in a variety of forms3 and derive primarily from tombs4 dateable to the New Kingdom (Fig. I).5 They have often been labelled as “milk vessels ” and were associated by various authors with the cult of Hathor.6 Such ves ­ sels are also known as metallic variants 7 8or as imitations in glass. The purpose of this paper is to present feminoform vases from domestic contexts that potentially contribute to our understanding of the possible use and function of this type of vessel as the present state of knowledge is mainly derived from funerary records.
    [Show full text]
  • Frit Slurrys!
    Here, at Creative Paradise Inc, weFRIT have been playing SLURRYS! around with dierent ways to use frit on glass. We have come up with a cool and unique way to blend frit colors, and all it involves is a splash of water powdered frit! In the following tutorials we will show you how we made all the fun and interesting color patterns and mixes in the samples pictured. It can be a messy process but the unique results speak for them selves! For the rst project, we blended our frit slurry’s on a Materials used: square of Double ick Clear COE96 sheet glass, and COE96 8.5” x 8.5” Double ick Clear Sheet Glass then slumped it on our GM 142 Quad Swoop Slump- All COE96 Frits: all in one ring! F1 Black Opaque F1 Deep Purple Transparent F1 Bronze Transparent F1 Turns Pink Striker Transparent F1 Medium Amber Transparent F1 Transparent Orange Water and a spray bottle of water Paper Towels Paper Cups/ small Mixing bowls Plastic knife, Spoon ZYP/Boron Nitride Glass Separator Spray CPI GM142 Mold Step 1. Cut a 8.25” x 8.25” square out of COE96 Transparent Glass. Clean the square of glass with glass cleaner before you begin to use it. Image 1 Step 2. *Create a Bronze frit slurry. With a How to make the frit slurry mix: Put the desired color spoon, place some of the mixture into the middle *of frit you want into a paper cup (or other mixing of the square. Spread the Bronze slurry to create container)and add a splash of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Bethany Saunders Religious Associations of EC139
    The possible religious associations of EC139 by Bethany Saunders EC139 is a dark blue faience fragment from the rim of a lotus bowl, which would have been originally measured as 18cm in diameter. The morphology of the bowl is believed to have been carinated, shown from the clear curvature of the sherd (starting at 50.7mm) which shows the vessel to have been a shallow, open bowl. The inside of the sherd is significantly darker blue than the outside but there are areas with lighter pigment showing an inconsistency within the colouring. Various black lines can be seen on the inside, which join at the tip and extend outward as they move away from the rim. The lines are rounded at the bottom and meet with one another to create a U shape. The presence and placement of additional pointed tips reveal this black design to be a typical lotus flower, as commonly seen in representations of the blue lotus in ancient Egyptian art. The main flower is clearly visible but the rest of the decoration is visually limited due to damage that removed glaze and potential oxidation. The remnant of a similar faded petal lies next to it, which is shown on similar marsh bowls that follow the pattern of an open lotus covering the base. The Egypt Centre has dated EC139 to the 18th Dynasty, New Kingdom. Parallel bowls can be used in conjunction, such as EA4790 (BM), and 22.3.73 (MMA), and are also dated to the New Kingdom, commonly being found in Thebes, Upper Egypt.1 These pieces are useful comparisons within relative A full view of the inside of EA4790, depicting dating to establish a typology, as they share the similar iconography.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Tiles: Conservation and Restoration Lesl-Fm.Qxd 11/10/04 10:16 AM Page Ii
    Lesl-Fm.qxd 11/10/04 10:16 AM Page i Architectural Tiles: Conservation and Restoration Lesl-Fm.qxd 11/10/04 10:16 AM Page ii Butterworth-Heinemann Series in Conservation and Museology Series Editors: Arts and Archaeology Andrew Oddy British Museum, London Architecture Derek Linstrum Formerly Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies, University of York US Executive Editor: Norbert S. Baer New York University, Conservation Center of the Institute of Fine Arts Consultants: Sir Bernard Feilden Page Ayres Cowley, Conservation Architect, New York David Bomford National Gallery, London John Fidler English Heritage, London C.V. Horie Manchester Museum, University of Manchester Sarah Staniforth National Trust, London Jeanne Marie Teutonico The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles Published titles: Care and Conservation of Geological Material (Howie) Chemical Principles of Textile Conservation (Timár-Balázsy, Eastop) Conservation and Restoration of Ceramics (Buys, Oakley) Conservation and Restoration of Glass (Davison) Conservation of Building and Decorative Stone (Ashurst, Dimes) Conservation of Earth Structures (Warren) Conservation of Furniture (Rivers, Umney) Conservation of Historic Buildings (Feilden) Conservation of Historic Timber Structures (Larsen, Marstein) Historic Floors: Their History and Conservation (Fawcett) A History of Architectural Conservation ( Jokilehto) Lacquer: Technology and Conservation (Webb) The Museum Environment, 2nd Edition (Thomson) The Organic Chemistry of Museum Objects, 2nd Edition (Mills, White) The Textile
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Ceramics, Indelible Creations: Assessing and Preserving the Scripps Collection Josephine Ren
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2019 Islamic Ceramics, Indelible Creations: Assessing and Preserving the Scripps Collection Josephine Ren Recommended Citation Ren, Josephine, "Islamic Ceramics, Indelible Creations: Assessing and Preserving the Scripps Collection" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1353. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1353 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ren 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………………………...………………………2 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………...3 Chapter 1. Surveying the Scripps Islamic Ceramics…………………………………….9 ​ ​ Condition Reports, Formal Analyses, and Contextual Backgrounds Appendix 1……………………………………………………………………………...39 Figures Chapter 2. Ethics, Problems, and Proposals for Future Collections Care……………...64 ​ ​ Preventive Conservation and Prioritization of Certain Wares Appendix 2……………………………………………………………………………...80 Figures Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………....87 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………….90 Ren 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to begin by thanking my readers for all their time, mental energy, and support in overseeing this project. These colleges are fortunate to have you and your expertise. Professor Blessing has been key
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Maiolica Ceramic Dishes in the Old Town in Vilnius
    THE EARLIEST MAIOLICA CERAMIC DISHES IN THE OLD TOWN IN VILNIUS MIGLĖ URBONAITĖ-UBĖ BALTICA 21–22 BALTICA Abstract The paper analyses maiolica ceramic dishes from the late 16th and early 17th centuries found in Vilnius’ Old Town. The items in question were the first imported maiolica dishes in the town. They are classified and their production sites are identified on the basis of their technical and stylistic characteristics, and in accordance with foreign analogies. Thus, five plates are as- signed to the Antwerp production centre, while the stylistic and manufacturing characteristics of another plate are found to be ARCHAEOLOGIA similar to the Haarlem and Antwerp maiolica production centres. One small bowl with religious inscriptions is assigned to the Faenza production centre in Italy. A fragment of a berrettino-type plate is associated with the Liguria region or Venice. The paper attempts to assess the significance of the first maiolica dishes in daily life in Vilnius in the late 16thand early 17th cen- turies. The relationship between the find spots and historical data suggests that four dishes could be associated with Catholic monasteries. During the period in question, maiolica ceramics were a rarity: they performed both an aesthetic and a luxury function; on three pieces of bottoms of plates, holes were found for hanging the plate on the wall. The information presented in the paper provides an opportunity to deepen our knowledge about maiolica dishes in Vilnius’ Old Town, which have not been investigated much, and to identify the prospects for further research. Key words: Vilnius’ Old Town, ceramic dishes, maiolica, Antwerp, Faenza, Liguria.
    [Show full text]
  • FINE EUROPEAN CERAMICS Wednesday 14 June 2017
    FINE EUROPEAN CERAMICS Wednesday 14 June 2017 SPECIALIST AND AUCTION ENQUIRIES EUROPEAN CERAMICS Sebastian Kuhn Nette Megens Sophie von der Goltz FINE EUROPEAN CERAMICS Wednesday 14 June 2017 at 2pm New Bond Street, London VIEWING ENQUIRIES CUSTOMER SERVICES PHYSICAL CONDITION OF Sunday 11 June Nette Megens Monday to Friday 8.30am LOTS IN THIS AUCTION 11am - 3pm Head of Department to 6pm PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY Monday 12 June +44 (0) 20 7468 8348 +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 REFERENCE IN THIS 9am - 4.30pm [email protected] CATALOGUE TO THE PHYSICAL Tuesday 13 June Please see page 2 for bidder CONDITION OF ANY LOT IS FOR 9am - 4.30pm Sebastian Kuhn information including after-sale GENERAL GUIDANCE ONLY. +44 (0) 20 7468 8384 collection and shipment INTENDING BIDDERS MUST SALE NUMBER [email protected] SATISFY THEMSELVES AS TO 24223 THE CONDITION OF ANY LOT Sophie von der Goltz AS SPECIFIED IN CLAUSE 14 OF CATALOGUE +44 (0) 20 7468 8349 THE NOTICE TO BIDDERS [email protected] CONTAINED AT THE END OF £25.00 THIS CATALOGUE. International Director BIDS As a courtesy to intending +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 European Ceramics & Glass bidders, Bonhams will provide a +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax John Sandon written indication of the physical To bid via the internet please +44 (0) 20 7468 8244 condition of lots in this sale if a visit bonhams.com [email protected] request is received up to 24 hours before the auction starts. This Please note that bids should be written Indication is issued submitted no later than 4pm on subject to Clause 3 of the Notice the day prior to the sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Glazing in a Catenary Arch Kiln
    SALT GLAZING IN A CATENARY ARCH KILN by ELDON LAVERN CLARK B. F. A., University of Kansas, 1953 A MASTER' S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Art KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1966 Approved by: i#j w^,'. Major Professor ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2 History of Salt Glazing 2 Technical Aspects of Salt Glazing .... 5 Kilns 17 MATERIAL AND METHODS 19 Construction of Catenary Arch Kiln 19 Operational Procedures 29 ANALYSIS OF FIRED WARE 39 Clay Body 39 Colorants 40 Salt Mixtures 42 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 43 Conclusions 43 Recommendations 44 EVALUATION OF THESIS POTTERY 45 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 85 REFERENCES .86 MfLD TV c ^ INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to determine the plausibility of salt glazing in a catenary arch kiln. The study was limited to kiln construction and its operation, and to ware production which characterized the simple, direct quality inherent in salt glazing. Background material was obtained from three, major sources: library collections of Kansas State University and the University of Kansas, personal correspondence with potters who have worked with salt glazing, and personal experience. The salt-glazing process is an inexpensive means of obtaining a hard, but handsome, glaze for stoneware. The salt-glazing industry flourished in Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries, and produced items such as ceramic utensils, beer mugs, and storage Jars. The industry was active in America during the colonial period. Today, however, salt glazing, on a large scale, is confined to industrial materials.
    [Show full text]