TRANCE FORMATION OF AMERICA
TRANCE Formationof Americais the documentedautobrography of a victim of govemmentmind control.Cathy O'Brien is the only vocaland recoveredsurvivor of the CentralIntelligence Agency's MK-Ultra Project Monarchmind controloperation. Chiseled deep into the white stoneof the CIA's Langley,Virginia headquartersis a partialverse lifted from the Holy Bibfeand writings of SaintJohn..." and the truthshall make you free." This statement, like the agency,is totalreality. The buildingthat it is engravedlpon housesthe world's most successfulmanufacturer of lies to facilitatepsychological warfare. "Company" The usestruth andtechnology as their raw materialsto produce"pure" liesfor controlof you andAmerica's allies. Within thepages of TRANCE Formation of America you'll find thetruth.
U.S. GOVERNMENT MIND CONTROL
On August3rd, 1977the 95thU.S. Congressopened hearings into the reportedabuses conceming the CIA's TOP SECRETmind controlresearch program code named MK Ultra. On February8th 1988, anMK Ultra victim,Cathy O'Brien, was covertly rescued from her mind controlenslavement by Intelligenceinsider Mark Phillips.Their seven yearpunuit of Justicewas stopped FOR REASONSOF NATIONAL SECURITY. TRANCEFormation of Americaexposesthe truth behind this criminal abuseof theUnconstitutional 1947 National Security Act. uSP$00ililililJlllillllllllllllllllllilllflrsBN0-1th01h5-'{-a TRA]YCE FORMATION OF AMERICA
Twelfth Edition Privatelypublished in the United Statesof America by Reality Marketing, Incorporated
www.trance-formation.com
Copyright1995 ISBN 0-9660I 65-4-8 Library of Congress 2001 616223
Distributedby TGS Services 22241PinedaleLane Frankston,Texas 75763 903-876-3256
I T TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
PART I
INSERTS: VARIOUS SUPPORTTVE DOCIIMENTS AND PTCTURES ...... 32
PART II AN OPEN LETTER...... ,,..75 DEDICATrON...... ,..76 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ,.....77 TRANCE-FORMATTON OF AMBRICA...... 78 CHAPTER1...... 81 My TNTRODUCTION TO HUMANITY...... 81 CHAPTER2...... 87 THE RITE TO REMAIN SILENT ...... 87 CHAPTER3...... g4 MY FIRST PRESIDENT ...... 94 CHAPTER4...... g7 THE MOST DANGEROUSGAME ...,,...... g7 cHAprER5...... 103 TINKERINGWITH THE MIND .....I03 cHAprER6...... 109 UMTED STATES MILITARY & NASA MrND_CONTROL TRAIMNG...... 109 CHAPTER7...... 15 CHARMSCHOOL...... 115 cHAprER8...... t21 CIA'S WAR ON DRUGS OPERATION: ELIMTNATTNG COMpETmoN...... ,.. r2l
CHAPTER32 ...... 218 A PLACETO RLrN,NO NEEDTO HIDE ...... 2I8 CHAPTER33 ...... 222 EPILOGUEUPDATE ...... 222 VICTIM OF THE SYSTEM\TIMELINE ...... ,....,...... 225 SILENCEEQUALS DEATH REFERENCELIST INDEX
BOOK ORDERINGINFORMATION (at theend ofbook)
lll PART I
by Mark Phillips TWELFTH PRINTING Since tlie first printing of TRANCE was released in September1995, many of the hard-to-comprehenddetails have been verified and miraculously managedto surface through our controlled medias. Pleasehelp us any way you can to provide this book to anyonewho will further researchits contentsand thus shine the light of truth on the psychological warfare plan that is being silently wagedagainst humanity. Pleaseremember, for as long as your thoughtsremain free, and cclnsiderthe psychologicalannoyance poser of a singlemosquito in a room with no light. This book will remain in print until justice prevails,the technological antidote for Kelly is provided, and unbi- ased,uncensored mass news media attentionis given to the contentsof this book. Thank you for your support. pBEwoRq
by Mark Phillips
". . . with liberty andjustice for all."
Preambleto the United StatesConstitution
My name is Marquart (Mark) Ewing Phillips, born May 17, 1943 in Nashville. Tennessee. I have no criminal record and I have never been adjudged insane. I am not a scholar, professional writer, or mental health ptiysician. While I lack the offrcial published academic credentials, I am iec,ognizedinternationally by mental trealth and law enforcement professionals as ariauthority on the secretscience concerning external control of fhe mind. The purpose of Part I of this book is to document how this reputation was gained. This brief and highly condensed contribution is intended to provide an understandingof why, when, and where I embarked on a study of the most secret technology-declassified knbwn to man: Trauma-basedmind control. Through the publication of United States Govemment documents,_our U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) admits that this ancient wizard's mechanismfor control is so dangerous that most information pertaining to it must remain classified as TOP-SECRET. As the employee of a DOD subcontractor with exposure to mind-control research, I was required to sign an gqth of- secrecy. I am restricted by law from revealing certain specific information to this day "sensitive" that direcily pertained to hy employment as, among other exposures,- a U.S. DOD subcontractorin mind-control research. This super secrettechnology is an evolved systemof remote human physical and psychological manipulation that has only recently been officially recognized by' a-ciedited mental health physiciansfor what it i.s,_absolute mind_ control. My first encounter with- rirind-control research began in the late 1960s in Ailan6, Georgia on the Emory University campus at the Yerkes Primate Center. It wi there that I leained about lrimate behavior modification-the basis for human mind control. Part I of this book is my attempt to impart an understanding of how this and other exposures would prepare me for the challengeof a lifetime. what I witnessed,in terms of technology, at the Yerkes Primate Center and other government sponsored research facilities, combined with years of personal research into this science of mind manipulation, did not adequately prepare me for what I would be exposedto in 1988 through an unexpectedchain of events. This exposurecame in the form of personal acquaintancewith the human results ofhcially entitled by DOD as, among other cryptic file titles, MK-Ultra.' I have outlined tnis noxious intr6duction in tropesthat the material provided by one MK-Ultra survivor, Cathy O'Brien, will incite a legitimate federal investigation of her claims. I was able to liberate MK-Ultra victims, Cathy O'Brien and her daughter,, Kelly, from the invisible grip of this U.S. Government secret weapon. of contiol. In the process, I also helped Cathy recover her mental and physical health. Howevei, I have not been successful in enlisting the cooperation of my government to pursue the justice issue. There is a reason for this failure to justice you, reader, NEED TO KNOW. I have been told obtain that the " repeateilly, "Justiceis not obtainable,For ReasonsOf National Security. . This book is primarily the autobiographyof Cathy O'Brien, who did not volunteer tor seryrce to -her country, but was used her entire life against her innate, vglqnqry _ryi! lor perpetulting criminal activity by many-so-called leaderswithin the u.S. Government. These "treasonous "seryice" ieadLrs,' diil volunteer for.political to our country. They must be held accountablefor their actions. Together, cathy and I have dedicatedour lives to the Dursuit of iustice and rehabilitation for her and Kelly. AII avenuesfor justice anb rehabili6tive relief have been blocked For Reasons of National s6curity. The question arises, whose perhaps security?. cathy 9_'Pri",l provides the logical-answer. aftei reading this work, you will ^inspireothers to readlt. collectively, as iatriots, ye carl m+e.a positive difference for Cathy and Kelly, our governmint, and humanity, by_having our voices heard. In niy opinioni6ur grEat United Starcs Constitution does not need to be amended it nrfudsto be-enforEed. . The grim reality we must all embrace is that there is, in human terms, no Justlce, ang r.l9 r_eye_nge_adequateto equal what these two, and many other victims of this u.S. Government secret weapon experiehced. The only remaining remnant of opportunity for justice ior theje survivors would bL derived from -a public forum expos6 of what they experienced. what these survivors need to witness is the mass dissemination of their story and a radical, positive changein their government's managementof secrets. Tiris would be ari acceptable,though belated, substitutefor justice. Their hope lies in the belief that-- "Truth lives a wretchedlife, but alwayssurvives a lie." Anonymous
i I
I W"i*t io, Harvey M., M.D., Psychiatry And The Cia. Waims Of Mirrd Control AmericanPsychiatric Press, 1990. CHAPTER 1
MIND COI.I"TROL BY ANY OTHER NAME
Sometimes words, or groups of words, found in the English language have many defrnitions or meanings. Within each meaning there may be different logical and literal perceptions of the application of a given word. However, the words mind control usually conjure up a single response. This is most unfortunate due !o the vast differences of perception contained within the reference. For example, if you have access to a late I980s Randarn House or later Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary and reference mind control, you will notice there is a conspicuous absenceof a listing. Should you go one step further and secure a college professor's teaching copy of Oxford's Companion To Thc Mind (Oxford Press 1987), you can reference practically anything concerning research of the mind without a reference to mind control. Perhaps yoq Tay now realize that throlgh Random House, Webster and Oxford Press omissions, you :re a victim of information control.
I Mind control is sometimes loosely defined as information control. This I being one of many accepted ways to iefrne the term should immediately raise questions of distrust towards your information souroes. Since what we think is basedon what we learn, manipulation of a mind, or a nation of minds, can be accomplished through control of information. With thought control being a result of information control, many avid researchers of mind sciences simply label it "soft" mind control. These days, we live in a world in which the continued existence of multinational businesses and govemments depends upon instant com- munications. However, with consideration to the so-called problem of information overload, it would appear to most people that we hear and see enough to make rational decisions concerning our individual lives. Unfortunately, this is not true. What we don't know, as evidenced by mind- control atrocities, is quickly destroying society as we have known it. The answer to this problem is glaringly apparent. We, as citizens of a supposedly free country, should not permit our government to restrict any information that protects criminal activity under the guise of National Security. Secret knowledge equals power, with the end result being control. Therefore, despite the deliberate efforts of those persons in control of national media information management (who are not media employees), results of secret mind-control projects gone awry have been leaking out for years through the media. People are literally waking up to the mind-control reality because there is an obvious lack of logical explanation for cerlain sensational news events. What really happened at Jim Jones' fonestown and with Sirhan Sirhan, John Hinkley, and I-ee Haney Oswald? And, more importantly, why did it happen? The simple common denominator existing among these persons has been publicly stated by the media, based on research of their medical histories, is mind control. In reality, information control is but one component of mind control. "brain Whereas washitrg," a term coined by an investigative journalist writing about Korean War P.O.W.s around 1951, described the results of what the Chinese regarded as thought reform. The term brainwashingdenotes to most peoplethe destructionof a person,s lnemo_Iy.This slang term continuesto be usedby the news media in place of the. al.l encompassingterm, mind control. In ieality, applied brainwashing techniquesare similar to thoseused in trauma-basedbehaviof modification. Pfqqg _thepast three decades,a significant number of religious groups worldwide has been cited by the mainstreamnews media as destructivecults. An empluis-on q9 word de$tructiveis necessaryin defining thesegroups as cults. Random House Diaionary defines cult- as "a particular system of religious rygrship". !y this definition, the word cult would encompassall religions._.Thgse so-called deskuctive cults have been publicly -mind denounced by the news media f9r using brainwashing,thought reform, and manipuEtion tactics on their believers. However, there is an obvious lack of expressed concernby these samemedia as they fail to addressthe underlying isiues of mind contiol, the powerbasis for abuie. - Perhapsthe reporting news media can not, for somersmon, publicly open the proverbial Pandora'sBox. Is it plausiblethen to considei that-closer scrqtiny,by the media and the public, of thesedestructive cults' leadership could reveala solid connectionto governmentsponsored mind-control research? These are questionsthqt, in themselvesproperly addressed,would provide importantanswers to this socialepidemic ihvolving physical and psychological abuse. The answersthat an in-depth professional-irivristigationwould pro:viae could be the first step in resolving the rash of problemsthat destructiv-ecults, serialkillers, andsexual child abusers,thrust upon society. As consumersof nationalnews media supplied information, we continueto accepthalf-truths which, in this casescenario, is seeingand hearing only what resultsfrom massmind manipulation. Historiansprovide us a glimpse into the future through recordedevents of the past. It appearsthat throughoutrecorded history, man has, towardsthe end of each millennium, returned to a focus on certiin types of bizarre human behavior. For example,there has been in the past 150 years a resurgenceof wide spread interest in the occult "black arts" which include satanism or Lucifarian religions. Theseconstitutionally protected nreligions" use traumato controlthe mindsof their followers. Mind-control practices within the occult groups (according to survivors adjudgedcredible and law enforcementofficials) have been accreditedwith bridging the gap betweenapplied scienceand Shamanism. Occultismas a ryan-nerof_religious expression has been around for thousandsof years. Only in the last 150 years has scienceaggressively pursued the truths regarding riind manipulationhidden within the occultbelief systemsthemselves. According ta the RandomHouse Dictionary, occulttsm "is the practice of qllegedsciences claiming knowledgeof supernaturalagencies which i.re beyond the range of ordinary knowledge." Once again, it is a reminder that secret knowledgeequals power. In 1971, the New York Ttmesreported a story on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and occult research,the basis of which was gained through a collectionof documentsreleased by - the U.S. GovernmentPrinting Offrce uhder the Freedomof Information Act. This was a report to Congreis and cleady showedthat the CIA was interestedin the causeand effect clinical findings that occult religious practices have on the Black Arts practitioner's and/or the observer'smind. Of particularinterest to the CIA were tlte heightenedlevels of suggestibility that certain occult rituals produced in the minds of the practitioners. Cannibalismand blood rituals were rankedhighest in the order of importanceto their research. Behavioral psychology teachesus that control of human suggestibility is recognizedas the fundamentalbuilding block for externalcontrol of the mind. This suggestibility factor alone potentially createsa human rights legal issue when we consider constructinglaws to protect people from overt or covert mind-controlpractices. Considerationto the humansuggestibility factor could result in all forms of consumeroriented service and/or product advertising becomingillegal. Advertising and the marketing of servicesand/or products throughcommunications c:m be justifiably definedas a type of psychological manipulation,thought reform and/or mind manipulationwhich resultsin a form ofbehaviormodification. A patriotfriend, StevenJacobson, published his book entitledMind cowrol in Ameica, in 1985,eloquently exposing the scienceof mind manipulationthrough advertising. The basisfor successfullymodifying human behavior requires mind manipulation techniquesthat, when expertly appliedthrough advertising media, become a form of "soft" mind control. Factoringin suggestibilitythrough the tactile sensesas the "Achilles' heelu of the humanrace renderseveryone vulnerable to becoming,on somelevel, a victim of soft mind control. The controversyof what is and what is not mind control rageson among scholarsin the schoolsof law, humanrights, and mentalhealth. All the while the confusionof issuesprovides a form of legal protection for practitionersof trauma-basedmind control, the only known form of remotehuman control that is absolute.All other formsof mind control,including chemical and electronic manipulations,are consideredby mind-controlexperts as temporary. There are laws protectingU.S. citizens' rights to practicetheir religious beliefs and freedom of speech. There are no laws which specifrcallyprotect leadersof destructivecults and/or practitionersof trauma-basedmind control. However,because of the U.S. Government'suse of mind controland the broad diversity of legal opinion concerningthe acceptedlimits of free speechand religious practices, the legal loop holes for criminals employing mind-control techniqueson their "flocks" for personalgain remainopen. For every problem there existsa solution. The formula for problern solving restsfirmly on the quality of the supportingresearch information concerningtlte nature of the problem. Irgislating laws specifically to protect people from mind-control abuseswould be futile. Practically every civilized society in existencehas some law and/or group of laws which would protect the people and punish the practitionersof mind control. I:ws are enforcedaccording to lawmakers' interpretations of the specific legal language. The lack of enforcementof laws already on the books that could pro0ectus from mind- control abusesstems from applied legal interpreations and cover-upsof sur- vivor testimonyby the CIA and National SecurityAgency (NSA) For Reasons Of National Security. Mind-control atrocities, if committed by anyone who could be linked to governmentsponsored projects, are typically ignored and coveredup. Access to the courts by thesehapless survivors is thus stonewalledby governmentpaid so-called legal experts who receive their orders from the National Security Agency. Defining the term "mind control" is akin to definingthe limits of the 1947 National Security Act. The basis for the solution to the National Securi$ controversyis simple. It is known as: Truth logically applied. rt is an obvioustruq ttril theNational of military securityAct hasbeen interpreted, not :?fir#rf#lfrt#:t '*;;i;i"'6d i;-pd;;;ift activity Repeal of this Act.and replacement with the.established rules of military conductconcernins Nationai saili';;t ao constitutionatriehts-of noi--i"frft; ;po" the 1m-rica'9;ii;":ry o?'ilevr u' rights of its alrie-swourd in compliancew-ith the coiiitutioi.-''rr resurt
t
"a I ISBN # 0-911485{0_7
I I r I CHAPTER2
"Ey"ry revolution, bloody or bloodless, has two phases. The first is the struggle for Treedom; the second the struggle for power. The phase of the struggle-for .F ry4oT is divine. He who has participated in it invariably feels, physically, that his best and most precious-inner self has come to the iurface. We. kgory that being faithful to the TRUTH stands higher than our own participation in governing the country-and that is why *e must not have a societythat would reject ethical norms in the name of poiitical mirages.',r As I was saying to my grandmother, Mamaleen Johnson, "My life has turned.into.a nightmare and I'm wide awake," tears were streaming-down my face, dripping off my chin onto her patent leather shoes. She afTectionately patted my shoulder as she listened The words we exchanged, the room's wallpaper and furnishings, my-a beloved grandmother, Mamaleen, even the taste of my tears combined-with feellp. of overwhelming grief--it is all there etchedinto my memory.-of This was the summer before I was to enter my sec