DOCSLIB.ORG

Alternative Fuels for Light-Duty Vehicles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alternative Fuels for Light-Duty Vehicles Replacing Gasoline: Alternative Fuels for Light-Duty Vehicles September 1990 OTA-E-364 NTIS order #PB91-104901 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Replacing Gasoline: Alternative Fuels for Light-Duty Vehicles, OTA-E-364 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1990). For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (order form can be found in the back of this report) Foreword Among the several major issues that Congress has addressed in the process of reauthorizing the Clean Air Act, the future role of alternative highway transportation fuels in reducing urban smog is one of the more prone to argument. Past attempts to reduce pollution levels from highway vehicles have focused primarily on the vehicles themselves; adjustments to fuels were considered mainly when these were necessary to allow vehicular controls to work (eliminating lead from gasoline was necessary to avoid poisoning the catalytic converters on the vehicles). As vehicular emissions control efficiencies rose past 90 percent and further improvements became more difficult, however, attention turned to the idea that some alternatives to gasoline have combustion and/or other physical and chemical properties that might allow the achievement of ultra-low emissions levels. The fuels of interest include methanol (wood alcohol), ethanol (grain alcohol), natural gas, electricity, and hydrogen. In this report, requested by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, which is part of OTA’s ongoing assessment of Technological Risks and Opportunities in Future U.S. Energy Supply and Demand, OTA gives a broad overview of the qualities of the competing fuels and examines in depth some of the most contentious issues associated with the wisdom of active Federal support for introducing the fuels. Areas of uncertainty that affect the debate on Federal support include fuel cost (including costs of building new infrastructure and modifying vehicles); the air quality effects of the new fuels; effects on energy security; other environmental impacts of the fuels; and consumer acceptance of the changes in vehicle performance, refueling procedures, costs, and other facets of the transportation system that would follow a large-scale introduction of any of the fuels. The report singles out for special examination the arguments concerning the costs, energy security implications, and air quality impacts of introducing methanol fuels into the fleet. However, the other fuels have similar levels of uncertainty and contentiousness. As this report goes to press, the oil-driven crisis in the Middle East mounts daily and could erupt at any time into major conflict. Alternative fuels will play a minor-to-negligible role in near-term responses to that situation, because the time required to make fundamental changes in our energy supply and demand require years, if not decades. In the longer term, however, if the United States desires to take advantage of the opportunities with alternative fuels to reduce the likelihood and impacts of future such events of armed conflict or to capitalize on the potential substantial environmental advantages inherent in these fuels, we must adopt a sensible, long-term national investment commitment to effect those changes. w Director Replacing Gasoline: Alternative Fuels for Light-Duty Vehicles— Advisory Panel John Sampson Toll, Chairman University of Maryland James H. Caldwell, Jr. Edwin Rothschild ARCO Solar, Inc. Citizen/Labor Energy Coalition Daniel A. Dreyfus Milton Russell Gas Research Institute University of Tennessee Frederick J. Ellert Maxine Savitz General Electric Co. Garrett Ceramic David R. Johns Charles A. Berg David R. Johns Real Estate Group Northeastern University David Lee Kulp Robert Wallace Ford Motor Co. Peabody Holding Co. Jessica Mathews Jack W. Wilkinson World Resources Institute sun co., Inc. Edward H. Mergens Robert Williams Shell Oil Co. Princeton University Nathan Rosenberg Mason Willrich Stanford University Pacific Gas and Electric Co. NOTE: OTA appreciates and is grateful for the valuable assistance and thoughtful critiques provided by the advisory panel members. The panel does not, however, necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse this report. OTA assumes full responsibility for the report and the accuracy of its contents. iv OTA Project Staff—Replacing Gasoline: Alternative Fuels for Light-Duty Vehicles Lionel S. Johns, Assistant Director, OTA Energy, Materials, and International Security Division Peter D. Blair, Energy and Materials Program Manager Project Staff Steven E. Plotkin, Project Director Administrative Staff Tina Brumfield Lillian Chapman Linda Long Contributors Rosina Bierbaum, OTA Oceans and Environment Program Robert M. Friedman, OTA Oceans and Environment Program Jana B. Milford, University of Connecticut Contractor Energy & Environmental Analysis, Inc., Arlington, VA Reviewers David Greene Jerrold L. Levine Oak Ridge National Laboratory Amoco oil co. Mark DeLuchi Terry Reuner University of California, Davis Amoco oil co. Daniel Sperling Thomas J. Lareau University of California, Davis American Petroleum Institute James Mackenzie Alan C. Lloyd World Resources Institute South Coast Air Quality Management District Edward H. Mergens Michael Kelly Shell Oil Co. Jensen Associates, Inc. David Lee Kulp Christopher Flavin Ford Motor Co. Worldwatch Institute Eugene Eklund Nicholas Lenssen 12907 Asbury Drive Worldwatch Institute Dave Gushee John Young Library of Congress Worldwatch Institute Daniel J. Townsend Harry Schwochert ARCO Products Co. General Motors Corp. Michael Jackson Margaret A. Walls Acurex Corp. Resources for the Future Carl Moyer Robert Williams Acurex Corp. Princeton University William J. Schumacher Joan Ogden SRI International Princeton University Dixon Smith Brad Holloman Chevron U.S.A. Inc. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Bruce Beyaert Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Eric Vaughan Renewable Fuel Association Paul Holtberg Gas Research Institute Gordon Allardyce Chrysler Motors Charles L. Gray, Jr. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Barbara Goodman Solar Energy Research Institute Phil Lorang U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tom Cackette California Air Resources Board Julie Hayden U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Jana Milford University of Connecticut Robert Bruetsch U.S. Environmental Protection Agency K.G. Duleep Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. J. Dillard Murrell U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Thomas Bull Food and Drug Administration David Bartus U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Glyn Short ICI General Chemicals Robert P. Howell 19 Elkin Court vi Contents Page Executive Summary . 1 OVERVIEW . 1 Meeting Society’s Goals . 3 Other Key Issues . 4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . 4 The Perceived Benefits of Alternative Fuels . 6 Introducing Alternative Fuels Into the Light Duty Fleet . 11 Chapter I. Introduction . ....** 23 Chapter 2. Why Support Alternative Fuels? . 31 OZONE CONTROL IN PERSPECTIVE . 31 Why Control Ozone? . .32 Ozone and Its Precursors . 33 Controlling Volatile Organic Compounds . 34 Controlling Nitrogen Oxides . 40 The Role of Alternative Fuels . 40 ENERGY SECURITY IN PERSPECTIVE . 42 Should Energy Security Be a Major Concern for U.S. Policymakers? . 42 Energy Security Effects of Alternative Fuels . 48 THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT IN PERSPECTIVE . 49 Introduction . .. 49 Key Uncertainties . 50 Benchmarkarming: The Effect of Doubled Cob . 53 Reducing C02 Emissions in the Near-Term . 53 The Transportation Sector and Global Warming . 54 U.S. Transportation Energy Use and CO2 Emissions . 55 Alternative Fuels . 56 Chapter 3. Substituting Methanol for Gasoline in the Automobile Fleet . 59 EFFECTS 0N AIR QUALITY . 60 Organic Compounds and Ozone Reduction. 61 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) . 69 Carbon Monoxide . 69 Toxic Emissions . 70 Greenhouse Emissions . 71 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL/SAFETY EFFECTS . 72 COST COMPETITIVENESS . .73 INFRASTRUCTURE . 79 ENERGY SECURITY IMPLICATIONS . 80 METHANOL OUTLOOK AND TIMING . 83 APPENDIX 3A: FACTORS AFFECTING METHANOLCOSTS . 84 Feedstock Costs . 84 Production Costs . 87 Capital Charges . .. 88 Long-Distance Shipping . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HYDROGEN ECONOMY VS. METHANOL ECONOMY SARTHAK TIBDEWAL, UTSAV SAXENA and ANAND V
    Int. J. Chem. Sci.: 12(4), 2014, 1478-1486 ISSN 0972-768X www.sadgurupublications.com HYDROGEN ECONOMY VS. METHANOL ECONOMY SARTHAK TIBDEWAL, UTSAV SAXENA and ANAND V. P. GURUMOORTHY* Chemical Engineering Division, School of Mechanical and Building Sciences, VIT University, VELLORE – 632014 (T.N.) INDIA ABSTRACT Today, the human civilization is very much dependent on fossil fuels, which make the blood and bone of this modern world. These precious natural resources, which form over the course of hundreds of years, are being consumed swiftly. In this alarming situation, it is very much necessary to think for a replacement, which fulfils the social needs without disturbing the environmental stability. One such approach discussed most over the years is ‘Hydrogen economy-Producing and using hydrogen as a clean fuel’, but there is no infrastructure for it. As it is a volatile gas, so it needs to be handled and stored at high a pressure. Moreover, it is an inflammable gas, which makes its usage as a transportation fuel difficult. A more potential and reasonable alternative, which is gaining importance is ‘Methanol Economy’ where methanol can be used as a source for transportation, energy storage and raw material for artificial hydrocarbons and their commodities. It is an excellent fuel. Methanol prices today are competitive with hydrocarbon fuels (on energy basis). Development is noted on the commercial conversion of biomass to methanol by means of thermochemical mechanism. Adequate feedstock of natural gas and coal lies to empower the handling of exhaustible methanol as transition fuel to renewable methanol from biomass. This paper discusses methanol’s potential as an alternate of the hydrogen economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Methanol Report Renewable Methanol Report
    In association with: Renewable Methanol Report Renewable Methanol Report Renewable Methanol Report This report has been produced by ATA Markets Intelligence S.L. on behalf of the Methanol Institute. The information and opinions in this report were prepared by ATA Markets Intelligence and its partners. ATA Markets Intelligence has no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in this report change. Publication Date: December 2018 ATA Markets Intelligence makes every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information, but we make no representation that it is accurate or complete. In no event shall ATA Markets Intelligence and its partners be liable for any damages, Authors: losses, expenses, loss of data, loss of opportunity or profit caused by the use of the material or contents of this report. Charlie Hobson ATA Insights is a brand of ATA Markets Intelligence, whose registered office is located in Calle Serrano, 8, 3º izquierda, Carlos Márquez (editor) Post-code 28001, Madrid, Spain. Registered in the Mercantile Registry of Madrid, CIF number B87725198. Design: © Methanol Institute 2018 Henrik Williams www.methanol.org 2 Renewable Methanol Report CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................................................. 5 Why consider renewable methanol? .................................................7 Legislation drives change.....................................................................................7 Report structure ..................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Technoeconomics and Sustainability of Renewable Methanol and Ammonia Productions Using Wind Power-Based Hydrogen Michael J
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Chemical and Biomolecular Research Papers -- Yasar Demirel Publications Faculty Authors Series 2015 Technoeconomics and Sustainability of Renewable Methanol and Ammonia Productions Using Wind Power-based Hydrogen Michael J. Matzen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Mahdi H. Alhajji University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Yasar Demirel University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cbmedemirel Part of the Biochemical and Biomolecular Engineering Commons, Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Commons, and the Thermodynamics Commons Matzen, Michael J.; Alhajji, Mahdi H.; and Demirel, Yasar, "Technoeconomics and Sustainability of Renewable Methanol and Ammonia Productions Using Wind Power-based Hydrogen" (2015). Yasar Demirel Publications. 9. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cbmedemirel/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Chemical and Biomolecular Research Papers -- Faculty Authors Series at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yasar Demirel Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. hemical E C n d g e in c e Matzen et al., J Adv Chem Eng 2015, 5:3 n e a r i v n d g A Advanced Chemical Engineering http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2090-4568.1000128 ISSN: 2090-4568 Research Article Open Access Technoeconomics and Sustainability of Renewable Methanol and Ammonia Productions Using Wind Power-based Hydrogen Michael Matzen, Mahdi Alhajji and Yaşar Demirel* Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln NE 68588, USA Abstract This study analyzes and compares the economics and sustainability aspects of two hydrogenation processes for producing renewable methanol and ammonia by using wind-power based electrolytic hydrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Light-Duty Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Federal Test Procedure Emissions Results
    September 1999 • NREL/TP-540-25818 Light-Duty Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Federal Test Procedure Emissions Results K. Kelly, L. Eudy, and T. Coburn National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-98-GO10337 September 1999 • NREL/TP-540-25818 Light-Duty Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Federal Test Procedure Emissions Results K. Kelly, L. Eudy, and T. Coburn Prepared under Task No. FU905010 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-98-GO10337 TP-25818 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was sponsored by the Office of Technology Utilization, which is part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Transportation Technologies in Washington, D.C. Mr. Dana O’Hara is DOE’s program manager for the light-duty vehicle evaluation projects at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Appreciation is expressed to the three emissions laboratories that performed the testing: Environmental Research and Development, in Gaithersburg, Maryland; Automotive Testing Laboratory, in East Liberty, Ohio; and ManTech Environmental, in Denver, Colorado. We also thank Phillips Chemical Company and Compressed Gas Technologies for supplying the test fuels for this project. NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, appara- tus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Methanol Trends and Developments
    Renewable methanol Trends and developments IEA EGRD Eelco Dekker, Chief EU Representative, Methanol Institute Paris, October 21, 2019 WWW.METHANOL.ORG 01 Introduction WWW.METHANOL.ORG A global industry association • First formed in 1989, the Methanol Institute (MI) serves as the trade association for the global methanol industry. • MI represents the world’s leading methanol producers, distributors and technology companies from offices around the world MI provides value to its members by: • Ensuring safe handling of methanol and its derivatives • Promoting methanol growth by furthering methanol as an essential chemical commodity and an emerging source of clean and renewable energy • Influencing global regulatory and public policy initiatives that impactthe methanol industry WWW.METHANOL.ORG 2019 members Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Ecofuel Tier 4 WWW.METHANOL.ORG Methanol is simplest of alcohols • Simple molecule rich in Formula: CH3OH hydrogen, with only a single Density: 0,792 g.cm-3 carbon bond Molar mass: 32,04 g mol-1 • Clear and colorless liquid at Appearance: colourless liquid room temperature and ambient pressure • Also known as “wood alcohol,” methanol can be produced from a wide range of feedstocks WWW.METHANOL.ORG Broad feedstock range, many applications feedstock conversion derivatives products markets other 7% appliances solvents 4% chloromethanes 2% ~65% automotive natural gas MTO 18% methylamines 3% DME 8% construction biodiesel 3% gasoline blending 9% ~35% electronics MTMA 2% MTBE 8% coal fuel acetic acid 9% methanol synthesis paint
    [Show full text]
  • Methanol As Motor Fuel
    IEA-AMF Annex 56 Methanol as motor fuel – CO2 emission was reduced to just 40 g/km. M85 has ideal properties for both summer and winter in Denmark. Danish Technological Institute Title: Methanol as motor fuel Prepared for: EUDP 2018-I Prepared by: Danish Technological Institute Teknologiparken Kongsvang Allé 29 8000 Aarhus C Transport og Elektriske Systemer May 8th 2019 Author: Kim Winther ISBN: J.nr. 64018-0719 2 Danish Technological Institute Table of Contents 1. Executive summary ......................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction .................................................................................................... 6 3. Vehicle experiments ......................................................................................... 7 3.1. Test setup .............................................................................................. 7 3.2. Engine control unit and fuel system ........................................................... 9 3.3. Results ..................................................................................................12 3.3.1. Engine power ...................................................................................12 3.3.2. Fuel consumption ..............................................................................14 3.3.3. Noise ...............................................................................................14 3.3.4. Emissions .........................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Ahead from Hydrogen to Methanol Economy: Scope and Challenges
    Moving ahead from Hydrogen to Methanol Economy: Scope and challenges Ankit Sonthalia SRMIST: SRM Institute of Science and Technology Naveen Kumar Delhi Technological University Mukul Tomar Delhi Technological University Edwin Geo V ( [email protected] ) SRM University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-3984 Thiyagarajan S SRM Institute of Science and Technology Arivalagan Pugazhendhi Ton Duc Thang University Research Article Keywords: Hydrogen, methanol, biomass, carbon dioxide, syngas, gasication Posted Date: March 4th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-280230/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Moving ahead from Hydrogen to Methanol Economy: Scope and challenges 1,2 2 2 3* Ankit Sonthalia , Naveen Kumar , Mukul Tomar , Varuvel Edwin Geo , Subramanian Thiyagarajan3 and Arivalagan Pugazhendhi4 1Department of Automobile Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, NCR Campus, Ghaziabad – 201204, India 2Center for Advanced Studies and Research in Automotive Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Bawana Road, Delhi – 110042, India 3Green Vehicle Technology Research Centre, Department of Automobile Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu – 603203, India 4Innovative Green Product Synthesis and Renewable Environment Development Research Group, Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract Energy is the driver in the economic development of any country. It is expected that the developing countries like India will account for 25% hike in world-wide energy demand by 2040 due to the increase in the per capita income and rapid industrialization. Most of the developing countries do not have sufficient oil reserves and imports nearly all of their crude oil requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing Gasoline: Alternative Fuels for Light-Duty Vehicles
    Executive Summary OVERVIEW als requirements, feedstock requirements, and so forth. The variety of effects, coupled with the Recent interest in alternative fuels for light-duty existence of the three separate “policy drivers” for highway vehicles (automobiles and light trucks) is introducing alternative fuels, create a complex set of based on their potential to address three important trade-offs for policymakers to weigh. Further, there societal problems: unhealthy levels of ozone in are temporal trade-offs: decisions made now about major urban areas; growing U.S. dependence on promoting short-term fuel options will affect the imported petroleum; and rising emissions of carbon range of options open to future policymakers, e.g., dioxide and other greenhouse gases. This assess- by emplacing new infrastructure that is more or less ment examines the following alternative fuels: adaptable to future fuel options, or by easing methanol, ethanol, natural gas (in either compressed pressure on oil markets and reducing pressure for (CNG) or liquid (LNG) form), electricity (to drive development of nonfossil alternative fuels. Table 1 electric vehicles (EVs)), hydrogen, and reformulated presents some of the trade-offs among the alternative gasoline. fuels relative to gasoline. Substituting another fuel for gasoline affects the Much is known about these fuels from their use in entire fuel cycle, with impacts not only on vehicular commerce and some vehicular experience. Much performance but on fuel handling and safety, materi- remains to be learned, however, especially about Photo credtt General Motors Corp. GM’s Impact electric vehicle, though a prototype requiring much additional testing and development, represents a promising direction for alternative fuel vehicles: a “ground up,” innovative design focused on the unique requirements of the fuel sources, in this case electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Methanol As a Marine Fuel
    METHANOL AS A MARINE FUEL Chris Chatterton, COO LNGgc ASIA 27 – 28 FEBRUARY 2019 NOVATEL, CLARKE QUAY, SINGAPORE WWW.METHANOL.ORG Contents - About MI - Developing Trends for New Capacity - Global Methanol Fuel Blending - Methanol as Marine Fuel WWW.METHANOL.ORG MEMBERS Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Ecofuel Tier 4 WWW.METHANOL.ORG DEVELOPING TRENDS 02 FOR NEW CAPACITY WWW.METHANOL.ORG WHERESUPPLY IS METHANOL CAPACITY PRODUCED? BY REGION • Merchant projects are focused in USGC • China future capacity additions may slow, with a focus on integrated facilities SupplySupply Capacity Capacity for for Methanol Methanol by Region 20122012 –- 2022E2022E 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 tonnes 50,000 - 000 - 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 - 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E Asia North America South America Europe Rest of World Middle East Source: MMSA WWW.METHANOL.ORG WHERECHINA IS METHANOLMETHANOL PRODUCED?DEMAND DRIVES WORLD MARKETS Projected Methanol Demand Growth, by Product & Region 2017– 2027E Source: MMSA WWW.METHANOL.ORG WHERERENEWABLE IS METHANOL PATHWAYS PRODUCED? MSF ВЕДЕТ СВОЮ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ В БОЛЕЕ ЧЕМ 60 СТРАНАХ МИРА WWW.METHANOL.ORG WHEREAN EFFICIENT IS METHANOL ENERGY PRODUCED? CARRIER WWW.METHANOL.ORG WHEREVARIOUS IS METHANOL STAGES OFPRODUCED? DEVELOPMENT Methanol category Commercial Feasibility and R&D Stopped or On-hold Bio-methanol • BioMCN (NL) • Biogo (GER) • BioMCN (glycerine) (NL) • Enerkem (CAN) • Enerkem (NL) • Chemrec (SE) • New Fuel (DEN) • LowLands
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Methanol: the Future Alternative for Both Fossil Fuels and Electric Drives?
    Bio-Methanol: The future Alternative for both Fossil Fuels and Electric Drives? Report written by: Antonia Meckel Viborg, June 2019 Executive summary Methanol as motor fuel has gained interest in recent years due to its low price, easy handling and high octane number. Methanol can nowadays be produced from biogas which yields an extremely low Greenhouse Gas emission – easily comparable to those of electric vehicles. Biogas is also very easy to come by, especially in Denmark with its enormous industry in cattle and hog farms. Efforts to establish a large methanol factory in Denmark with connection to the Danish gas grid are ongoing. Until that happens methanol can easily be imported from Norway. Certificate trading ensures that the methanol is based on Danish biogas. Methanol is not yet implemented in the Danish transport sector. The current exchange agreement between the fuel companies only allows ethanol to be added to gasoline. If this barrier could be removed, temporary fuels such as A7 could be introduced. In the long term, however, completely new fuels are required. The Danish Methanol Association and the Danish Technological Institute participate in a project that tested a 105 Octane M85 fuel consisting of 85% methanol and 15% petrol. The pilot car, a Peugeot 107 “City Car”, got a Flex Fuel Kit installed and its engine performance went up by 5-7% with all emissions kept in place. M85’s emission of CO2 is an important point in this report, and especially the comparison with the CO2 “neutrality” of electric vehicles deserves the spotlight we have given it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Methanol Alternative Robert Zubrin
    REVIEWS & RECONSIDERATIONS The Methanol Alternative Robert Zubrin ny serious energy policy to all three dimensions of the energy must deal with three criti- problem. Acal issues. First, economic: There is no shortage of energy The policy must provide an ener- experts with grand designs and pro- gy resource base sufficient to allow posals—from technophile dreams of for continued worldwide economic an unworkable “hydrogen economy,” growth for the foreseeable future. to Malthusian calls for enforced eco- Second, environmental: The policy nomic limits through conservation, must be compatible with the long- to socialist schemes for creating term flourishing of life on Earth, massive government-subsidized syn- including human life and civilization. thetic-fuel industries, to the libertar- And finally, stra- ian faith in the tegic: The policy Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy Invisible Hand. must ensure that By George A. Olah, Alain Goeppert, and Compared to G. K. Surya Prakash control of the Wiley-VCH ~ 2006 ~ 290 pp. such misguided Earth’s energy $29.95 (hardcover) alternatives, the resources, and competence and thus its future, lies in the hands of free rationality of The Methanol Economy societies committed to human prog- is refreshing. ress, and taken away from tyrannical The authors begin by describing the and terrorism-promoting states. dimensions of the worldwide energy George Olah, recipient of the 1994 problem: Even as our reserves of fos- Nobel Prize in Chemistry, is one of sil fuels have grown in recent decades, the giants of twentieth-century sci- the demand is growing faster, and as ence, and his coauthors are solid tech- more of the world modernizes, a nical men.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogas Technology
    FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL BIOGAS PROGRAMME (FAO/TCP/NEP/4451-T) BIOGAS TECHNOLOGY: A TRAINING MANUAL FOR EXTENSION NEPAL September 1996 Consolidated Management Services Nepal (P) Ltd. CMS House, Lazimpat, GPO Box # 10872, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel # (977-1 ) 410 498/421 654, Fax # (977-1) 415 886 E-mail : [email protected] FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL BIOGAS PROGRAMME (FAO/TCP/NEP/4451-T) BIOGAS TECHNOLOGY: A TRAINING MANUAL FOR EXTENSION NEPAL September 1996 Consolidated Management Services Nepal (P) Ltd. CMS House, Lazimpat, GPO Box # 10872, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel # (977-1 ) 410 498/421 654, Fax # (977-1) 415 886 E-mail : [email protected] FAO/TCP/NEP/4415-T Consolidated Management Services Nepal PREFACE Biogas has proved to be a viable technology in the physical and socio-economic conditions of Nepal. The hydropower generating potential of Nepal is calculated as one of the highest in the world but only about 12 percent of the population is connected to the national electricity grid. The percapita energy consumption is one of the lowest in the world and more than 90 percent of the energy use is in the domestic sector, mainly for cooking. Nepal's agrarian economy is fully dependent on imports for all of its chemical fertilizer, petroleum and coal requirements. The growing population and small scale industries are pushing the use of traditional sources of energy (forest and agricultural waste) beyond the sustainable generation capacity of the existing forest and farm lands.
    [Show full text]