DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2101.09203V1 [Gr-Qc] 22 Jan 2021 a Powerful Selection Principle Can Be Implemented by Mation Behavior (Sec.III)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2101.09203V1 [Gr-Qc] 22 Jan 2021 a Powerful Selection Principle Can Be Implemented by Mation Behavior (Sec.III) Coordinate conditions and field equations for pure composite gravity Hans Christian Ottinger¨ ∗ ETH Z¨urich,Department of Materials, CH-8093 Z¨urich,Switzerland (Dated: January 25, 2021) Whenever an alternative theory of gravity is formulated in a background Minkowski space, the conditions characterizing admissible coordinate systems, in which the alternative theory of gravity may be applied, play an important role. We here propose Lorentz covariant coordinate condi- tions for the composite theory of pure gravity developed from the Yang-Mills theory based on the Lorentz group, thereby completing this previously proposed higher derivative theory of gravity. The physically relevant static isotropic solutions are determined by various methods, the high-precision predictions of general relativity are reproduced, and an exact black-hole solution with mildly singular behavior is found. I. INTRODUCTION As the composite theory of gravity [9], just like the underlying Yang-Mills theory, is formulated in a back- Only two years after the discovery of Yang-Mills theo- ground Minkowski space, the question arises how to char- ries [1], it has been recognized that that there is a strik- acterize the \good" coordinate systems in which the the- ing formal relationship between the Riemann curvature ory may be applied. This characterization should be tensor of general relativity and the field tensor of the Lorentz invariant, but not invariant under more general Yang-Mills theory based on the Lorentz group [2]. How- coordinate transformations, that is, it shares the formal ever, developing this particular Yang-Mills theory into a properties of coordinate conditions in general relativity. consistent and convincing theory of gravity is not at all However, the unique solutions obtained from Einstein's straightforward. The ideas of [2] have been found to be field equations only after specifying coordinate condi- \unnatural" by Yang (see footnote 5 of [3]), whose work tions are all physically equivalent, whereas the coordi- has later been criticized massively in Chap. 19 of [4]. nate conditions in composite gravity characterize phys- Nevertheless, the pioneering work [2] may be considered ically preferred systems. From a historical perspective, as the origin of what is now known as gauge gravitation it is remarkable that Einstein in 1914 still believed that theory [5,6]. the metric should be completely determined by the field An obvious problem with the Yang-Mills theory based equations and, therefore, a generally covariant theory of on the Lorentz group is that it has the large number of 48 gravity was not desirable (see [10] for a detailed discus- degrees of freedom, half of which are physically relevant. sion). The important task of characterizing the preferred One is faced with six four-vector fields satisfying second- systems in composite gravity is addressed in the present order evolution equations. For the pure field theories, paper. Once it is solved, we can provide a canonical the physical degrees of freedom are essentially given by Hamiltonian formulation of composite theory of gravity the two transverse components of the four-vector fields, beyond the weak-field approximation [11] and we obtain like in electrodynamics with its single vector potential. the static isotropic black-hole solution in a proper coor- In view of this enormous number of degrees of freedom dinate system. we need an almost equally large number of constraints to keep only a few degrees of freedom in a theory of grav- ity. In other words, we need a structured principle for The structure of the paper is as follows. As a prepara- selecting just a few ones among all the solutions of the tory step, we present the various variables and relations Yang-Mills theory based on the Lorentz group. between them (Sec.II) and discuss their gauge transfor- arXiv:2101.09203v1 [gr-qc] 22 Jan 2021 A powerful selection principle can be implemented by mation behavior (Sec. III). A cornerstone of the devel- means of the tool of composite theories [7,8]. The basic opment is the close relationship between the covariant idea is to write the gauge vector fields of the Yang-Mills derivatives associated (i) with a connection with torsion theory in terms of fewer, more fundamental variables and and (ii) with the Yang-Mills theory based on the Lorentz their derivatives. The admission of derivatives in this so- group. The core of the composite theory of gravity con- called composition rule implies that the composite theory sists of the field equations presented for several sets of involves higher than second derivatives. The power of the variables (Sec.IV) and the coordinate conditions charac- tool of composite theories results from the fact that, in terizing the admissible coordinate systems (Sec.V). As their Hamiltonian formulations [7,8], the structure of an application, we determine the static isotropic solutions the constraints providing the selection principle is highly and provide the results for the high-precision tests of transparent. gravity as well as an exact black-hole solution (Sec.VI). We finally offer a detailed summary of our results and draw a number of conclusions (Sec. VII). A number of detailed results and arguments are provided in six ap- ∗ [email protected]; www.polyphys.mat.ethz.ch pendices. 2 II. VARIOUS VARIABLES AND RELATIONS a 1 2 3 4 5 6 BETWEEN THEM (κ, λ) (0; 1) (0; 2) (0; 3) (2; 3) (3; 1) (1; 2) For the understanding of composite theories, it is im- TABLE I. Correspondence between the label a for the base vectors of the six-dimensional Lie algebra so(1; 3) and ordered portant to introduce different kinds of variables and to pairs (κ, λ) of space-time indices. clarify the relations between them. On the one hand, we have the metric tensors, tetrad variables, connections and curvature tensors familiar from general relativity and six vector fields associated with six pairs (κ, λ), or with other theories of gravity. On the other hand, we have the a label a taking the values from 1 to 6 according to Ta- gauge vectors and field tensors of the Yang-Mills theory bleI. The pairs (0 ; 1), (0; 2), (0; 3) correspond to Lorentz based on the Lorentz group. boosts in the respective directions (involving also time) An important step is the decomposition of metric ten- and the pairs (2; 3), (3; 1), (1; 2) correspond to rotations sors in terms of tetrad or vierbein variables, in the respective planes, as can be recognized by analyz- ing the gauge transformation behavior of the fields A g = η bκ bλ = bκ b ; (1) (κλ)ρ µν κλ µ ν µ κν resulting from the freedom of acting with Lorentz trans- κ κλ formations on b µ (see Sec. III for details). where ηκλ = η is the Minkowski metric with signa- ture (−; +; +; +). Throughout this paper, the Minkowski Following standard procedures for Yang-Mills theories metric is used for raising or lowering space-time indices. (see, e.g., Sect. 15.2 of [12], Chap. 15 of [13], or [14]), we For the inverses of the metric and the tetrad variables we can introduce a field tensor in terms of the vector fields, µν ¯µ introduce the componentsg ¯ and b κ. Note that they @Aaν @Aaµ bc are not obtained by raising or lowering indices of gµν and Faµν = µ − ν +gf ~ a AbµAcν ; (3) κ @x @x b µ, respectively. bc Equation (1) may be regarded as the characterization where fa are the structure constants of the Lorentz of metric tensors by symmetry and definiteness proper- group. A Lie algebra label, say a, can be raised or lowered ties. A general metric tensor may also be regarded as the by raising or lowering the indices in the pairs associated result of transforming the Minkowski metric. The decom- with a according to TableI. The structure constants can κ abc position of a metric gµν into tetrad variables b µ is not then be specified as follows: f is 1 (−1) if (a; b; c) is κ unique. If we multiply b µ from the left with any Lorentz an even (odd) permutation of (4; 5; 6), (1; 3; 5), (1; 6; 2) transformation, the invariance of the Minkowski metric or (2; 4; 3) and 0 otherwise (see also Eq. (A3)). under Lorentz transformations implies that we obtain an- The definition (2) suggests the following general pas- other valid decomposition. This observation reveals the sage from quantities labeled by a Lie algebra index to a origin of the underlying gauge symmetry of the composite quantity with space-time indices, theory of gravity. ~ κ λ The key role of the metric tensor in the present the- Xµν = b µb ν X(κλ): (4) ory is the characterization of the momentum-velocity re- lation, so that it can be interpreted as an indication of One then gets a deep relation between covariant deriva- tensorial properties of mass. While this is also the case in tives associated with metrics and connections on the one general relativity, Einstein's theory of gravity goes much hand and covariant derivatives associated with a Yang- further in the geometric interpretation of the metric by Mills theory based on the Lorentz group on the other assuming that it characterizes the underlying space-time. hand (for a proof of this fundamental relation based on In contrast, the present theory is developed in an under- the structure of the Lorentz group, see AppendixA), lying Minkowski space, which is the standard situation @X~µν for Yang-Mills theories. − Γσ X~ − Γσ X~ = @xρ ρµ σν ρν µσ As a next step, we introduce the vector fields A (κλ)ρ @X in terms of the tetrad variables (the pair (κ, λ) of space- κ λ (κλ) bc b µb ν ρ +g ~ f(κλ)AbρXc ; (5) time indices should be considered as a label associated @x with the Lorentz group, ρ as a four-vector index), ρ where the connection Γµν is given by κ λ 1 @gνρ @gµρ b µb ν A(κλ)ρ = − ρ 1 ρσ @gσν @gµσ @gµν ρσ 2 @xµ @xν Γ = g¯ +g ~ − =g ¯ Γ¯σµν : µν 2 @xµ @xν @xσ κ 1 κ @bκν @b µ (6) + b µ ρ − ρ bκν : (2) ρ 2~g @x @x Unlike the Christoffel symbols obtained forg ~ = 1, Γµν is not symmetric in µ and ν forg ~ 6= 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Projective Geometry: a Short Introduction
    Projective Geometry: A Short Introduction Lecture Notes Edmond Boyer Master MOSIG Introduction to Projective Geometry Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Objective . .2 1.2 Historical Background . .3 1.3 Bibliography . .4 2 Projective Spaces 5 2.1 Definitions . .5 2.2 Properties . .8 2.3 The hyperplane at infinity . 12 3 The projective line 13 3.1 Introduction . 13 3.2 Projective transformation of P1 ................... 14 3.3 The cross-ratio . 14 4 The projective plane 17 4.1 Points and lines . 17 4.2 Line at infinity . 18 4.3 Homographies . 19 4.4 Conics . 20 4.5 Affine transformations . 22 4.6 Euclidean transformations . 22 4.7 Particular transformations . 24 4.8 Transformation hierarchy . 25 Grenoble Universities 1 Master MOSIG Introduction to Projective Geometry Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Objective The objective of this course is to give basic notions and intuitions on projective geometry. The interest of projective geometry arises in several visual comput- ing domains, in particular computer vision modelling and computer graphics. It provides a mathematical formalism to describe the geometry of cameras and the associated transformations, hence enabling the design of computational ap- proaches that manipulates 2D projections of 3D objects. In that respect, a fundamental aspect is the fact that objects at infinity can be represented and manipulated with projective geometry and this in contrast to the Euclidean geometry. This allows perspective deformations to be represented as projective transformations. Figure 1.1: Example of perspective deformation or 2D projective transforma- tion. Another argument is that Euclidean geometry is sometimes difficult to use in algorithms, with particular cases arising from non-generic situations (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1911.13166V1 [Hep-Th] 29 Nov 2019
    Composite Gravitons from Metric-Independent Quantum Field Theories∗ Christopher D. Caroney High Energy Theory Group, Department of Physics, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795 (Dated: December 2, 2019) Abstract We review some recent work by Carone, Erlich and Vaman on composite gravitons in metric- independent quantum field theories, with the aim of clarifying a number of basic issues. Focusing on a theory of scalar fields presented previously in the literature, we clarify the meaning of the tunings required to obtain a massless graviton. We argue that this formulation can be interpreted as the massless limit of a theory of massive composite gravitons in which the graviton mass term is not of Pauli-Fierz form. We then suggest closely related theories that can be defined without such a limiting procedure (and hence without worry about possible ghosts). Finally, we comment on the importance of finding a compelling ultraviolet completion for models of this type, and discuss some possibilities. arXiv:1911.13166v1 [hep-th] 29 Nov 2019 ∗ Invited Brief Review for Modern Physics Letters A. [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION A quantum field may represent a fundamental degree of freedom, or a composite state described within the context of an effective theory that is applicable in a low-energy regime. The idea that the gauge fields of the standard model may not be fundamental has appeared periodically in the literature over the past 50 years [1{3]. Such models must have a gauge invariance even when no gauge fields are included ab initio. Of particular interest to us here are models like those described in Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1910.10745V1 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 23 Oct 2019 2.2 Symmetry-Protected Time Crystals
    A Brief History of Time Crystals Vedika Khemania,b,∗, Roderich Moessnerc, S. L. Sondhid aDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA bDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA cMax-Planck-Institut f¨urPhysik komplexer Systeme, 01187 Dresden, Germany dDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA Abstract The idea of breaking time-translation symmetry has fascinated humanity at least since ancient proposals of the per- petuum mobile. Unlike the breaking of other symmetries, such as spatial translation in a crystal or spin rotation in a magnet, time translation symmetry breaking (TTSB) has been tantalisingly elusive. We review this history up to recent developments which have shown that discrete TTSB does takes place in periodically driven (Floquet) systems in the presence of many-body localization (MBL). Such Floquet time-crystals represent a new paradigm in quantum statistical mechanics — that of an intrinsically out-of-equilibrium many-body phase of matter with no equilibrium counterpart. We include a compendium of the necessary background on the statistical mechanics of phase structure in many- body systems, before specializing to a detailed discussion of the nature, and diagnostics, of TTSB. In particular, we provide precise definitions that formalize the notion of a time-crystal as a stable, macroscopic, conservative clock — explaining both the need for a many-body system in the infinite volume limit, and for a lack of net energy absorption or dissipation. Our discussion emphasizes that TTSB in a time-crystal is accompanied by the breaking of a spatial symmetry — so that time-crystals exhibit a novel form of spatiotemporal order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fractal Dimension of Product Sets
    THE FRACTAL DIMENSION OF PRODUCT SETS A PREPRINT Clayton Moore Williams Brigham Young University [email protected] Machiel van Frankenhuijsen Utah Valley University [email protected] February 26, 2021 ABSTRACT Using methods from nonstandard analysis, we define a nonstandard Minkowski dimension which exists for all bounded sets and which has the property that dim(A × B) = dim(A) + dim(B). That is, our new dimension is “product-summable”. To illustrate our theorem we generalize an example of Falconer’s1 to show that the standard upper Minkowski dimension, as well as the Hausdorff di- mension, are not product-summable. We also include a method for creating sets of arbitrary rational dimension. Introduction There are several notions of dimension used in fractal geometry, which coincide for many sets but have important, distinct properties. Indeed, determining the most proper notion of dimension has been a major problem in geometric measure theory from its inception, and debate over what it means for a set to be fractal has often reduced to debate over the propernotion of dimension. A classical example is the “Devil’s Staircase” set, which is intuitively fractal but which has integer Hausdorff dimension2. As Falconer notes in The Geometry of Fractal Sets3, the Hausdorff dimension is “undoubtedly, the most widely investigated and most widely used” notion of dimension. It can, however, be difficult to compute or even bound (from below) for many sets. For this reason one might want to work with the Minkowski dimension, for which one can often obtain explicit formulas. Moreover, the Minkowski dimension is computed using finite covers and hence has a series of useful identities which can be used in analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Geometrical Versus Feynman's Quantum
    universe Review Einstein’s Geometrical versus Feynman’s Quantum-Field Approaches to Gravity Physics: Testing by Modern Multimessenger Astronomy Yurij Baryshev Astronomy Department, Mathematics & Mechanics Faculty, Saint Petersburg State University, 28 Universitetskiy Prospekt, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 17 August 2020; Accepted: 7 November 2020; Published: 18 November 2020 Abstract: Modern multimessenger astronomy delivers unique opportunity for performing crucial observations that allow for testing the physics of the gravitational interaction. These tests include detection of gravitational waves by advanced LIGO-Virgo antennas, Event Horizon Telescope observations of central relativistic compact objects (RCO) in active galactic nuclei (AGN), X-ray spectroscopic observations of Fe Ka line in AGN, Galactic X-ray sources measurement of masses and radiuses of neutron stars, quark stars, and other RCO. A very important task of observational cosmology is to perform large surveys of galactic distances independent on cosmological redshifts for testing the nature of the Hubble law and peculiar velocities. Forthcoming multimessenger astronomy, while using such facilities as advanced LIGO-Virgo, Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), ALMA, WALLABY, JWST, EUCLID, and THESEUS, can elucidate the relation between Einstein’s geometrical and Feynman’s quantum-field approaches to gravity physics and deliver a new possibilities for unification of gravitation with other fundamental quantum physical interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Collinear Effective Theory for Gravity
    Soft collinear effective theory for gravity Takemichi Okui and Arash Yunesi Department of Physics, Florida State University, 77 Chieftain Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA Abstract We present how to construct a Soft Collinear Effective Theory (SCET) for gravity at the leading and next-to-leading powers from the ground up. The soft graviton theorem and decou- pling of collinear gravitons at the leading power are manifest from the outset in the effective symmetries of the theory. At the next-to-leading power, certain simple structures of amplitudes, which are completely obscure in Feynman diagrams of the full theory, are also revealed, which greatly simplifies calculations. The effective lagrangian is highly constrained by effectively mul- tiple copies of diffeomorphism invariance that are inevitably present in gravity SCET due to mode separation, an essential ingredient of any SCET. Further explorations of effective theories of gravity with mode separation may shed light on lagrangian-level understandings of some of the surprising properties of gravitational scattering amplitudes. A gravity SCET with an ap- arXiv:1710.07685v3 [hep-th] 16 Feb 2018 propriate inclusion of Glauber modes may serve as a powerful tool for studying gravitational scattering in the Regge limit. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Building up gravity SCET 3 2.1 Fundamentals . .3 2.1.1 The target phase space . .3 2.1.2 Manifest power counting . .4 2.1.3 Other underlying assumptions . .5 2.2 The collinear lightcone coordinates . .5 2.3 Mode separation and scaling . .6 2.3.1 The collinear momentum scaling . .6 2.3.2 The cross-collinear scaling and reparametrization invariance (RPI) .
    [Show full text]
  • Fractal-Based Methods As a Technique for Estimating the Intrinsic Dimensionality of High-Dimensional Data: a Survey
    INFORMATICA, 2016, Vol. 27, No. 2, 257–281 257 2016 Vilnius University DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2016.84 Fractal-Based Methods as a Technique for Estimating the Intrinsic Dimensionality of High-Dimensional Data: A Survey Rasa KARBAUSKAITE˙ ∗, Gintautas DZEMYDA Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius University Akademijos 4, LT-08663, Vilnius, Lithuania e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received: December 2015; accepted: April 2016 Abstract. The estimation of intrinsic dimensionality of high-dimensional data still remains a chal- lenging issue. Various approaches to interpret and estimate the intrinsic dimensionality are deve- loped. Referring to the following two classifications of estimators of the intrinsic dimensionality – local/global estimators and projection techniques/geometric approaches – we focus on the fractal- based methods that are assigned to the global estimators and geometric approaches. The compu- tational aspects of estimating the intrinsic dimensionality of high-dimensional data are the core issue in this paper. The advantages and disadvantages of the fractal-based methods are disclosed and applications of these methods are presented briefly. Key words: high-dimensional data, intrinsic dimensionality, topological dimension, fractal dimension, fractal-based methods, box-counting dimension, information dimension, correlation dimension, packing dimension. 1. Introduction In real applications, we confront with data that are of a very high dimensionality. For ex- ample, in image analysis, each image is described by a large number of pixels of different colour. The analysis of DNA microarray data (Kriukien˙e et al., 2013) deals with a high dimensionality, too. The analysis of high-dimensional data is usually challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Composite Gravity from a Metric-Independent Theory of Fermions
    Composite gravity from a metric-independent theory of fermions Christopher D. Carone∗ and Joshua Erlichy High Energy Theory Group, Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795 Diana Vamanz Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Box 400714, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA (Dated: April 5, 2019) Abstract We present a metric-independent, diffeomorphism-invariant model with interacting fermions that contains a massless composite graviton in its spectrum. The model is motivated by the supersym- metric D-brane action, modulated by a fermion potential. The gravitational coupling is related to new physics at the cutoff scale that regularizes UV divergences. We also speculate on possible extensions of the model. ∗[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION In Refs. [1, 2], we presented a generally covariant model of scalar fields in which gravity appears as an emergent phenomenon in the infrared. The theory requires a physical cutoff that regularizes ultraviolet divergences, and the Planck scale is then related to the cutoff scale. The existence of a massless graviton pole in a two-into-two scattering amplitude was demonstrated nonperturbatively by a resummation of diagrams, that was made possible by working in the limit of a large number of physical scalar fields φa, for a = 1 :::N. Although that work assumed a particular organizing principle, namely that the theory could be obtained from a different starting point where an auxiliary metric field is eliminated by imposing a constraint that the energy-momentum tensor of the theory vanishes, one could have just as easily started directly with the resulting non-polynomial action D v ! 2 −1 N D−1 ! Z D − 1 u D 2 u X a a X I J S = d x t det @µφ @νφ + @µX @νX ηIJ ; (1.1) V (φa) a=1 I;J=0 where D is the number of spacetime dimensions and V (φa) is the scalar potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Euclidean Versus Projective Geometry
    Projective Geometry Projective Geometry Euclidean versus Projective Geometry n Euclidean geometry describes shapes “as they are” – Properties of objects that are unchanged by rigid motions » Lengths » Angles » Parallelism n Projective geometry describes objects “as they appear” – Lengths, angles, parallelism become “distorted” when we look at objects – Mathematical model for how images of the 3D world are formed. Projective Geometry Overview n Tools of algebraic geometry n Informal description of projective geometry in a plane n Descriptions of lines and points n Points at infinity and line at infinity n Projective transformations, projectivity matrix n Example of application n Special projectivities: affine transforms, similarities, Euclidean transforms n Cross-ratio invariance for points, lines, planes Projective Geometry Tools of Algebraic Geometry 1 n Plane passing through origin and perpendicular to vector n = (a,b,c) is locus of points x = ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) such that n · x = 0 => a x1 + b x2 + c x3 = 0 n Plane through origin is completely defined by (a,b,c) x3 x = (x1, x2 , x3 ) x2 O x1 n = (a,b,c) Projective Geometry Tools of Algebraic Geometry 2 n A vector parallel to intersection of 2 planes ( a , b , c ) and (a',b',c') is obtained by cross-product (a'',b'',c'') = (a,b,c)´(a',b',c') (a'',b'',c'') O (a,b,c) (a',b',c') Projective Geometry Tools of Algebraic Geometry 3 n Plane passing through two points x and x’ is defined by (a,b,c) = x´ x' x = (x1, x2 , x3 ) x'= (x1 ', x2 ', x3 ') O (a,b,c) Projective Geometry Projective Geometry
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 04- Projective Geometry
    Lecture 04- Projective Geometry EE382-Visual localization & Perception Danping Zou @Shanghai Jiao Tong University 1 Projective geometry • Key concept - Homogenous coordinates – Represent an -dimensional vector by a dimensional coordinate Homogenous coordinate Cartesian coordinate – Can represent infinite points or lines August Ferdinand Möbius Danping Zou @Shanghai Jiao Tong University 1790-1868 2 2D projective geometry • Point representation: – A point can be represented by a homogenous coordinate: Homogeneous coordinates: Inhomogeneous coordinates: Danping Zou @Shanghai Jiao Tong University 3 2D projective geometry • Line representation: – A line is represented by a line equation: Hence a line can be naturally represented by a homogeneous coordinate: It has the same scale equivalence relationship: Danping Zou @Shanghai Jiao Tong University 4 2D projective geometry • A point lie on a line is simply described as: where and . A point or a line has only two degree of freedom (DoF, 自由度). Danping Zou @Shanghai Jiao Tong University 5 2D projective geometry • Intersection of lines： – The intersection of two lines is computed by the cross production of the two homogenous coordinates of the two lines: Intersection of lines Here, ‘ ‘ represents cross production Danping Zou @Shanghai Jiao Tong University 6 2D projective geometry • Example of intersection of two lines: Let the two lines be • The intersection point is computed as : • The inhomogeneous coordinate is Danping Zou @Shanghai Jiao Tong University 7 2D projective geometry • Line across two points: • The line across the two points is obtained by the cross production of the two homogenous coordinates of the two points: Danping Zou @Shanghai Jiao Tong University 8 2D projective geometry • Idea point (point at infinity): – Intersection of parallel lines – Let two parallel lines be where .
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract a Natural Extension of Standard Warped Higher
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: A NATURAL EXTENSION OF STANDARD WARPED HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL COMPACTIFICATIONS: THEORY AND PHENOMENOLOGY Sungwoo Hong, Doctor of Philosophy, 2017 Dissertation directed by: Professor Kaustubh Agashe Department of Physics Warped higher-dimensional compactifications with \bulk" standard model, or their AdS/CFT dual as the purely 4D scenario of Higgs compositeness and par- tial compositeness, offer an elegant approach to resolving the electroweak hierar- chy problem as well as the origins of flavor structure. However, low-energy elec- troweak/flavor/CP constraints and the absence of non-standard physics at LHC Run 1 suggest that a \little hierarchy problem" remains, and that the new physics underlying naturalness may lie out of LHC reach. Assuming this to be the case, we show that there is a simple and natural extension of the minimal warped model in the Randall-Sundrum framework, in which matter, gauge and gravitational fields propagate modestly different degrees into the IR of the warped dimension, resulting in rich and striking consequences for the LHC (and beyond). The LHC-accessible part of the new physics is AdS/CFT dual to the mecha- nism of \vectorlike confinement", with TeV-scale Kaluza-Klein excitations of the gauge and gravitational fields dual to spin-0,1,2 composites. Unlike the mini- mal warped model, these low-lying excitations have predominantly flavor-blind and flavor/CP-safe interactions with the standard model. In addition, the usual leading decay modes of the lightest KK gauge bosons into top and Higgs bosons are sup- pressed. This effect permits erstwhile subdominant channels to become significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 6: Definition and Construction of Finite Element Subspaces
    18 NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF PDES 2.6. Definition of finite elements. We first define triangular finite element spaces, consid- ering the case when Ω is a convex polygon. For each 0 < h < 1, we let Th be a triangulation of Ω¯ with the following properties: i: Ω¯ = ∪iTi, ii: If Ti and Tj are distinct, then exactly one of the following holds: (a) Ti ∩ Tj = ∅, (b) Ti ∩ Tj is a common vertex, (c) Ti ∩ Tj is a common side. iii: each Ti ∈ Th has diameter ≤ h. B ¢B ¢@ ¢ B PP B ¢ @ B PB¢ B¢ ¢ @ B @ ¢ @ PP B ¢ PB @P¢ PPPBB¢¢ PP PP PP Triangulation of Ω P ¢B PP ¢ B PP ¢@ ¢ B B @ ¢ @ P B @¢ ¢B ¢B PPB @ ¢ B ¢ B @¢ B¢ B @ @ Not allowed @@ @@ @ @ Given a triangulation Th of Ω, a finite element space is a space of piecewise polynomials with respect to Th that is constructed by specifying the following things for each T ∈ Th: Shape functions: a finite dimensional space V (T ) of polynomial functions on T . Degrees of freedom (DOF): a finite set of linear functionals ψi : V (T ) → R (i = 1,..., N) which are unisolvent on V (T ), i.e., if V (T ) has dimension N, then given any numbers αi, i = 1,..., N, there exists a unique function p ∈ V (T ), such that ψi(p) = αi, i = 1,..., N. Since these equations amount to a square linear system of equations, to show unisolvence, we show that the only solution of the system with all αi = 0 is p = 0. A typical example of a DOF is ψi(p) = p(xi).
    [Show full text]