Received: 11 May 2018 Accepted: 24 September 2018 DOI: 10.1111/conl.12612 POLICY PERSPECTIVE Individual shark profiling: An innovative and environmentally responsible approach for selectively managing human fatalities Eric E. G. Clua1,2 John D. C. Linnell3 1 EPHE, PSL Research University, Perpignan, Abstract France Most shark-induced human fatalities are followed by widespread and unselective 2Labex Corail, CRIOBE, Moorea, French Polynesia culling campaigns that have limited effectiveness and may have high ecological costs 3Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, for threatened species. The blanket culling strategy implicitly assumes that incident Trondheim, Norway risk is directly correlated with shark density, an assumption that has yet to be demon- Correspondence strated. We present the alternative hypothesis that incidents are more likely to be Eric E. G. Clua, EPHE, PSL Research Univer- sity, CRIOBE USR3278 EPHE-CNRS-UPVD, caused by behavioral variability among individual sharks than due to shark density. F-66860 Perpignan, France. Throughout their ontogenetic development, large species of sharks opportunistically Email:
[email protected] establish a diet that is rarely, if ever, inclusive of humans as a food source. We pro- ORCID: D-7820-2013 pose that, some animals with specific behaviors (including boldness) may potentially Editor Matt W.Hayward pose a higher risk than conspecifics. Under this scenario, the risk of a shark attack in a given area would relate to the presence of a limited number of high-risk individuals rather than shark density. In terms of management of human fatalities, such a hypothesis would favor aban- doning general culling campaigns and replacing them with approaches that profile and selectively remove the potential problem individuals, as is done in the terrestrial realm when managing predators that attack humans or livestock.