Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Applied Soil Ecology
journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apsoil
Nematodes as an indicator of plant–soil interactions associated with desertification
a,∗ b c c
Jeremy R. Klass , Debra P.C. Peters , Jacqueline M. Trojan , Stephen H. Thomas
a
New Mexico State University, Plant and Environmental Science, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003, USA
b
USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range and Jornada Basin LTER, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003, USA
c
New Mexico State University, Entomology, Plant Pathology, and Weed Science, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Conversion of perennial grasslands to shrublands is a desertification process that is important globally.
Received 5 October 2011
Changes in aboveground ecosystem properties with this conversion have been well-documented, but
Received in revised form 14 February 2012
little is known about how belowground communities are affected, yet these communities may be impor-
Accepted 8 March 2012
tant drivers of desertification as well as constraints on the reversal of this state change. We examined
nematode community structure and feeding as a proxy for soil biotic change across a desertification
Keywords:
gradient in southern NM, USA. We had two objectives: (1) to compare nematode trophic structure and
Semi-arid grasslands
species diversity within vegetation states representing different stages of desertification, and (2) to com-
Nematode communities
pare nematode community structure between bare and vegetated patches that may be connected via a
Nematode diversity
Connectivity matrix of endophytic fungi and soil biotic crusts. The gradient included a perennial grassland dominated
Bouteloua eriopoda by Bouteloua eriopoda, the historic dominant in the Chihuahuan Desert, a duneland dominated by the
Prosopis glandulosa shrub, Prosopis glandulosa, and the ecotone between them. We also sampled a relatively undisturbed,
ungrazed B. eriopoda grassland at a nearby site to serve as an end member of our gradient. Nematode
communities were sampled using soil cores to depth of 50 cm at each location in 2009 and 2010. Results
showed that grasslands and mesquite dunelands had different trophic groupings and herbivorous nema-
tode communities with lower species diversity and evenness compared with the ecotone. Nematode
trophic structure and herbivore communities were significantly different in all vegetation states with
the highest observed diversity in the undisturbed, ungrazed B. eriopoda grassland in 2010. Vegetated and
bare ground patches within the two grassland sites had similar herbivore communities, especially species
from the family Tylenchinae. However, the mesquite duneland showed the lowest sampled diversity of
all sites, but had significantly larger nematode abundances in vegetated dunes than interdune areas that
are void of vegetation and soil biotic crusts where bacteriovores dominated. Decreased nematode trophic
structure and species diversity in the Jornada black grama grassland samples compared with the undis-
turbed grassland illustrate the effect of desertification on the soil biotic community. Our results show
that nematodes can be used to identify changes in belowground community structure based on trophic
interactions. Large-scale disturbances like desertification can have consequences on the diversity and
soil biotic functioning at finer spatial scales.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction and losses in soil nutrients that favor woody plants (Schlesinger
et al., 1990; Archer, 1994; Abrahams et al., 1995; Parsons et al.,
Desertification of arid lands is a global problem, with nearly 1997; Whisenant, 1999; Wainwright et al., 2000; Peters, 2002a,b).
40% of the world’s land area either already converted or suscep- Examining effects of drivers (e.g., multi-year drought, livestock
tible to a state change from productive grasslands to degraded overgrazing) of state changes on landscape-scale patterns often
shrublands or woodlands (Reynolds and Stafford Smith, 2002). focus on vegetation responses; much less is known about changes
These ‘state’ changes are difficult to restore because of the loss of in belowground communities that can influence vegetation
herbaceous productivity, grass propagules, and modifications in dynamics. However, shifts in belowground community structure
soil surface properties that result in increases in runoff and erosion associated with desertification may provide a constraint on the
ability of grasses to recover if soil biota critical to grass success are
missing from the shrubland. Because arid ecosystems consist of a
∗ mosaic of grass or shrub plants and bare soil interspaces (i.e., gaps),
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 575 571 6107; fax: +1 575 646 6041.
differences in soil biota between these two microhabitats may
E-mail address: [email protected] (J.R. Klass).
0929-1393/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.03.005
J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77 67
have important consequences for grass recovery. Our goal was to 1999; Ritz and Trudgill, 1999; Bongers and Ferris, 1999; Ferris et al.,
determine how soil biota differs across a grassland-to-shrubland 2001; Neher, 2010).
gradient of increasing woody plant abundance. This study relies on the quantification of nematodes with spe-
The composition of soil organisms (e.g., nematodes, bacteria, cific, morphologically distinguishable feeding behaviors as a proxy
fungi, etc.) determines the influence of the soil microbial commu- for characterizing changes in soil biota. We addressed the questions
nity on plant assemblages, in general (Ogle and Reynolds, 2004; to represent two spatial scales across a desertification gradient:
Reynolds et al., 2004; Collins et al., 2008). Soil biota can affect (1) how do nematode communities, and presumably the soil biotic
the establishment and abundance of individual plant species with consortia of vegetation states (black grama grasslands vs. mesquite
consequences for functional group and species diversity (van der shrublands), change? and (2) how do nematode communities differ
Putten et al., 1993; Molofsky, 1994; Bever et al., 1997; Mills between bare soil gaps and vegetated patches within each domi-
and Bever, 1998; Klironomos et al., 2000; Molofsky et al., 2001; nant vegetation type?
O’Hanlon-Manners and Kotanen, 2004; Reinhart et al., 2003, 2005).
A disruption or disturbance to soil biotic consortia can play an
integral role in the dynamics of a system, and may be responsi- 2. Methods
ble for either promoting shrub invasion or limiting grass recovery
(Wardle et al., 2004). In some cases, interactions between soil biota 2.1. Study site
and plants can generate feedback mechanisms among soil biotic
crusts, fungi, and plants (Belnap, 1996; Collins et al., 2008; Green The study was conducted at the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimen-
et al., 2008; Lucero et al., 2008; Porras-Alfaro et al., 2007, 2011; tal Range (JER) and Jornada Basin Long-Term Ecological Research
◦ ◦
Porra-Alfaro et al., 2008). Soil biotic crusts serve as an interface Site in southern New Mexico, USA (32 37 N, 106 40 W, and 1260 m
between the soil and atmosphere capable of fixing N and C while a.s.l.). The JER is a 100,000 ha research site located within the north-
affecting the abundance, diversity, and successional maturity of ern extent of the Chihuahuan Desert. Long-term (1915–2009) mean
other soil biota (Evans and Belnap, 1999; Belnap, 2003; Garcia- annual rainfall is 246 mm that is highly variable from year to year
Pichel et al., 2003; Darby et al., 2006). Dark septate fungi (DSF) with more than half of the precipitation occurring between July and
◦
are the dominant colonizers of many native plants as well as B. October. Mean monthly average temperatures peak in June (26 C)
◦
eriopoda in the arid southwest that have the ability to manage and are lowest in January (4 C). Upland grasslands on sandy soils
and regulate carbon in plant communities, aid in nutrient acqui- with a petrocalcic horizon at the JER are dominated by black grama
sition and allocation, and provide increased drought tolerance to (B. eriopoda) with mesa dropseed (Sporobolus flexuosus) and vari-
hosts (Barrow, 1997; Barrow et al., 2004; Lucero et al., 2006; Porra- ous three-awn species (Aristida spp.) as sub-dominate species. Over
Alfaro et al., 2008) The extension of fungal symbionts of B. eriopoda the past century, large areas of the upland grasslands have con-
leads us to expect that increased connectivity of vegetated patches verted to shrublands dominated by honey mesquite (P. glandulosa)
in grasslands harbor soil biotic communities linking vegetation (Fig. 1).
and soils biotic crusts that occupy bare ground patches. Shrub Sample locations were selected to represent both remnant
encroachment and increases in bare ground gaps that perpetu- black grama patches and historic areas that were previously grass-
ate erosion/deposition processes causes vegetative production and lands and are currently dominated by mesquite. The black grama
decomposition of organic matter to be much more heterogeneous and mesquite sites are the two end members of a desertification
that can have long term effects on nutrient availability and relegate gradient, with a mixture of grasses and shrubs in the ecotone
soil biotic communities to isolated vegetated patches (Schlesinger (Bestelmeyer et al., 2006). The ecotone sampling area represents
et al., 1990; Kéfi et al., 2007; Ravi et al., 2007; Scanlon et al., 2007). the transition zone between the two end members as part of
The Chihuahuan Desert of North America provides an oppor- the desertification gradient. These transition zones, or ecotones,
tunity to evaluate these processes and feedbacks. The vegetation present optimal conditions because they are areas that have a
on sandy soils consists of perennial grasses, primarily black grama high probability of response and are likely to experience thresh-
(Bouteloua eriopoda) and the shrub, honey mesquite (Prosopis old behavior, possess key processes that must be manipulated or
glandulosa) that occur at variable proportions of cover across a maintained in order to uphold current conditions or to reverse a
landscape, yet total vegetation cover is similar. A key system prop- current undesirable trend, and provide early warning indicators
erty that differentiates grasslands from shrublands is the spatial that can be used to monitor and evaluate changes in critical pro-
distribution and density of plants and their associated bare soil cesses (Peters et al., 2006). Because ecotones are defined by specific
interspaces (gaps) (Herrick et al., 2005; Okin et al., 2006). The characteristics, they allow for the evaluation of the impact of deser-
low diversity of soil organisms compared with mesic systems is tification on a landscape scale interacting with fine-scale soil biotic
most likely due to species operating close to their physiological communities specific to B. eriopoda and P. glandulosa.
tolerance limits in the hot and dry abiotic environment (Whitford, Soils on the Jornada vary in texture from sandy loams to loamy
1996). Therefore, the limited functional redundancy of soil biota sands with an indurated calcium carbonate layer at 15 to >50 cm
in arid systems increases the susceptibility of soil biotic commu- depths (Hochstrasser et al., 2002). All geomorphic descriptions for
nities to disturbances that can lead to profound impacts upon the Jornada Basin follow Monger et al. (2006). Sample locations all
ecosystem processes (Wall and Virginia, 1999). A study of plant occur on the same ancestral Rio Grande alluvium parent material
parasitic nematodes revealed less herbivory within a duneland site of the Camp Rice Formation, Fluvial Facies. These strongly devel-
compared with grassland sites that was suggested to aid in estab- oped soils with thick petrocalcic horizons are components of the
lishment of mesquite (Wall and Virginia, 1999). La Mesa surface where wind erosion has been the main source of
Because of the ubiquity and abundance of nematodes and the quartzose sand accumulated on down-wind piedmont slopes and
trophic specificity they exhibit, nematode community structure bedrock areas.
offers an efficient tool to assess soil biological function and food Nematode samples were also collected from Otero Mesa on
web quality (Bongers and Ferris, 1999). Specific nematode genera June 11, 2010 to be used as a complement to the desertifica-
are active within each heterotrophic food web level and can be tion gradient on the JER. Otero Mesa represents a reference site
grouped by functional guilds whose members respond similarly of intact, relatively undisturbed B. eriopoda grasslands. This Chi-
◦ ◦
to food web enrichment and to environmental perturbation and huahuan Desert site (32 30 N, 105 47 W) has the largest intact,
recovery (Yeates et al., 1993; Bongers and Bongers, 1998; Bongers, public desert grassland in America (485,622 ha). Roughly half of
68 J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77
Fig. 1. Progression of shrub encroachment through time at the Jornada LTER site, Dona˜ Ana County, NM. Vegetation delimited is all grass species and all woody shrub species
on the Jornada through time; courtesy of David Rachal. Created with GIS software package and datalayers obtained from Gibbens et al. (2005).
Otero Mesa is grassland, dominated by two species that occur on activity would be kept to a minimum. Each soil sample consisted
upland shallow soils, B. eriopoda and Bouteloua gracilis (blue grama). of three cores randomly collected using a 7 cm diameter auger to
P. glandulosa is virtually absent from the site and minimal wild a depth of approximately 50 cm, and composited in sterile plastic
and domesticated large animal grazing occurs. Mean annual pre- bags. A total soil volume of 1.1 l was collected from each sampling
cipitation is 255 mm/year with the majority occurring during the location within each vegetation site for nematode extraction, and
warm season (May–October). Soils of the sampled area are pre- to determine percentage soil moisture concentration at the time
dominantly silty, shallow calcareous soils derived from Paleozoic of sampling. Soil moisture values are not reported because values
limestone that also contains an indurated calcium carbonate layer. did not differ significantly among soil sampling sites or dates, and
The mean annual precipitation is 255 mm/year with the majority nematode numbers were not correlated to soil moisture, similar
occurring during the warm season (May–October). to previous studies (Freckman and Virginia, 1989). Grassland soil
samples were collected in three microsites: (1) beneath a black
2.2. Soil sampling and nematode extraction grama patch that included the rooting zone; (2) from areas void
of aboveground vegetation that had visible soils crusts (identified
Sampling at both sites occurred in two years during the dry sea- as either of two cyannolichens, the rugose soil crust Peltula richard-
son (2009 June 11 2009; 2010 May 27) to ensure that soil biotic sii or Collema sp.); and (3) from areas between vegetated patches
J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77 69
Table 1
Soil sampling regime from both the Jornada and Otero Mesa sites indicating sample year, within site soil sample location, soil sampling scheme, and soil sampling strategy.
Number in parentheses indicates the number of samples sampled in a giver year, numbers in sample location area breakdown of the total number of samples from 2009;
2010 sampling years.
Site Jornada Otero Mesa
Sample year 2009 (33)/2010 (50) 2010 (15)
Sample location Grassland (12; 15)/ecotone (9; 15)/duneland (12; 20) Undisturbed grassland (15)
Within site sample scheme Bare ground/vegetated patch/crust/dune/interdune Bare ground/vegetated patch/crust
Soil sampling strategies and analysis Nematode extraction and enumeration, species diversity Nematode extraction and enumeration, species diversity
and evenness, FB, HB, HT ratio analysis, connectivity and evenness, FB, HB, HT ratio analysis, connectivity
analysis. analysis.
that had little visual evidence of soil biotic crusts. Ecotone soil sam- species as well as rescaled each significant axes’ with 26 segments
ples were taken in areas where black grama and mesquite co-occur (McCune and Mefford, 2006). To determine the significance of the
at varying amounts of vegetative cover. Soil samples in the ecotone nematode community loadings on individual axes derived from
sites were collected from three microsites: (1) directly beneath a each DCA, a multiresponse permutation procedure was applied
mesquite shrub canopy, (2) within a patch of co-occurring black (MRPP) using Euclidean (Pythagorean) as the distance measure and
grama, and (3) from bare ground between a sampled black grama c(I) = n(I)/sum(n(I)) as the weighting option (PC-ORD Version 5.32).
patch and the nearest neighboring patch. Dune sampling mimicked The MRPP is a non-parametric procedure for testing the hypothesis
a previously conducted pilot project that examined dune archi- that no difference exists between two or more groups of entities,
tecture and identified which aspect of the dune would yield the and provides a significance test of DCA scores for each axis. The
greatest number of nematodes per sample. Based on the pilot-study procedure is therefore not held to the assumptions of multivari-
data, soil samples were taken from the top, the north and south ate normality and homogeneity of variance that seldom apply to
faces of each dune as well as an interdune sample located on the ecological data (Cai, 2006; McCune and Mefford, 2006). The MRPP
windward, southern facing side of each dune sampled. All soil sam- analyses also allow for pairwise comparisons that can be used to
ples were placed in a cooler to regulate soil temperatures during compare nematode community groupings among the different veg-
transport to the lab (Table 1). etation sites. DCA rescales and detrends the original axes, therefore
the traditional interpretation of eigenvalues is lost because the
2.3. Nematode community analyses correspondence between the eigenvalue and the structure along
each individual axis is lost. Therefore, an after-the-fact coefficient
Upon arrival in the laboratory, a portion of the soil sample of determination between relative Euclidean distance in the unre-
to be used for nematode extraction was rehydrated and stored duced species space and Euclidiean distance in the ordination space
◦
at room temperature (23 C) for 48 h to hatch nematode eggs was performed for each axis yielded by each individual DCA to eval-
and activate dormant, anhydrobiotic nematodes. The moistened uate the effectiveness of each ordination in explaining variation
◦
soil was then stored for 3–4 days at 15 C prior to extraction. within the data (McCune and Mefford, 2006).
Nematodes were extracted by elutriation-centrifugal flotation The nematode fungivore/bacteriovore ratio (FB ratio) was used
3
(Jenkins, 1964; Byrd et al., 1976) and quantified per 100-cm to gain insight into nutrient cycling via detrital pathways and the
volume of soil. An aliquot of each extracted sample was placed successional stage of the decomposer community. For the purpose
on a chambered counting slide and examined on an inverted of this analysis, we have categorized nematodes in the subfam-
Olympus IX51 compound microscope. Trophic groupings were ily Tylenchinae as a fungivore based on previous studies that have
categorized as bacteriovores, omnivores, fungivore, herbivores, identified the genera to feed upon the fungal energy pathway (e.g.,
carnivores, and Tylenchinae. Herbivore species were categorized Okada et al., 2002; Okada and Kadota, 2003; Okada et al., 2005).
into Tylenchinae (ectoparasite), Tylecnchorhynchus (ectopara- The bacteriovore/bacteriovore + herbivore ratio (BH ratio) was cal-
site), Paratylenchus (ectoparasite), Helicotylenchus (ectoparasite), culated in order to gather information about the grazing nematode
Criconemella (ectoparasite), Trichodorus (ectoparasite), Hoplolaimus and plant parasitic communities. Herbivorous nematode vs. the
(ectoparasite), Pratylenchus (migratory endoparasite), and Meloido- total nematode population (HT ratio) was also calculated in order
dera (sedentary endoparasite). In the 2010 samples, Tylenchinae to assess the total proportion of the herbivore community among
was grouped into two distinct groups based on morphological char- the three vegetation states that make up the desertification gra-
acteristics and are indicated as Tylenchinae 1 and Tylenchinae 2. dient. All three ratios were calculated for both 2009 and 2010 JER
Tylenchinae was categorized independently from other trophic samples. The calculated ratios were then subjected to univariate
groupings because of the niche breadth of this subfamily and (ANOVA) analyses using LSD post hoc tests to look for differences
the multiple energy channels that constituent genera have been among vegetation states. The FB ratio was log transformed to meet
observed to feed upon. Debate has arisen in the scientific literature the assumptions of ANOVA.
as to what trophic category is appropriate to use when categorizing Shannon’s index of diversity (H) was used to assess the nema-
members of the subfamily Tylenchinae because different species tode diversity at each location across the established desertification
have been observed to feed on algae, mosses, lichens (both fungal gradient and Otero Mesa soils for both trophic groups and herbi-
and filamentous cyannobacterial components), and are often times vore genera. Index values were then averaged by vegetation state.
the most abundant mycophagous species in the soil (Okada et al., Species evenness (E) was calculated using the same desertification
2002; Okada and Kadota, 2003; Okada et al., 2005). gradient on the JER and Otero Mesa soils in order to look at the equi-
Herbivorous nematodes were further identified to genus for tability of nematode communities associated with each vegetation
both sampling years. A detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) state.
was used to compare nematode counts from soils across the Multivariate (MANOVA) analyses using Wilks’ Lambda multi-
desertification gradient established at the JER for both trophic variate test statistic were conducted within sampled vegetation
and herbivore groupings during both sampling years, a compos- states to compare bare areas with vegetated areas. For this analysis,
ite JER analysis, and in a combined analysis with samples from both trophic groupings and herbivore genera from both sampling
the Otero Mesa grassland soils. The DCA used downweighted rare years were grouped and analyzed separately Grassland samples
70 J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77
collected from Otero Mesa were included with the data from the information can be gathered on herbivore community assem-
JER for this analysis. Post hoc tests were conducted to look at indi- blages based on the amount variation explained by the first and
2
vidual species and trophic grouping differences within sample sites additional axes from the DCA analysis (Axis 1, r = 0.014; Axis
2 2
using least significant differences (LSD). 2, r = −0.014; Axis 3, r = 0.000). High herbivore diversity was
observed in both the ecotone (H = 0.972) and the black grama grass-
land (H = 0.908) and substantially decreased within the mesquite
3. Results duneland sites (H = 0.219) and was significantly different among
2
vegetation states (F = 19.791, p < 0.001, r = 0.457). Herbivore even-
3.1. Desertification analysis ness was significantly different among vegetation states (F = 6.229,
2
p = 0.004, r = 0.229) and highest in the ecotone (E = 0.845) followed
Each vegetation state along the desertification gradient har- by the black grama grasslands (E = 0.701) and substantially lower
bored distinct nematode communities (Fig. 2a and b). The MRPP in the dune vegetation states (E = 0.288).
conducted on the DCA trophic scores validated these differences When Otero Mesa black grama grassland samples were included
(overall: A = 0.237, p < 0.001; pairwise comparisons: dune vs. eco- in the 2010 trophic and herbivore DCA, groupings aligned with the
tone: A = 0.129, p = 0.004; dune vs. grassland: A = 0.279, p < 0.001; black grama nematode communities taken from the JER within
ecotone vs. grassland: A = 0.108, p = 0.004). The effectiveness of ordination space (Fig. 3a and b), however, differences emerge
the ordination decreased as each higher axis was added (Axis 1, when the MRPP data is considered. Trophic analysis shows the
2 2 2
−
r = 0.230; Axis 2, r = 0.046; Axis 3, r = −0.015). Trophic diver- Otero Mesa (OM) nematode community structure to be signifi-
sity was found to be significantly different among vegetation cantly different when compared with the desertification gradient
2
states (F = 5.289, p = 0.011, r = 0.261) and highest in the ecotone sampled on the JER, including the black grama grassland (overall:
vegetation state (H = 1.106) followed by the mesquite vegeta- A = 0.232, p < 0.001; pairwise comparisons: dune vs. OM: A = 0.352,
tion state (H = 0.772) and the black grama grassland (H = 0.680). p < 0.001, grassland vs. OM: A = 0.035, p = 0.029, ecotone vs. OM:
Trophic evenness was not found to be significant among veg- A = 0.178, p < 0.001). Except for the first axis, no cumulative varia-
2 2
etation states (F = 1.703, p = 0.199, r = 0.102) but was shown tion was explained by the successively higher axes (Axis 1, r = 0.12,
2 2
to be highest in the ecotone (E = 0.769) followed by the black Axis 2, r = −0.26, Axis 3, r = −0.24). Nematode trophic diversity
grama grassland (E = 0.644) and the mesquite duneland (E = 0.596). was significantly different among all vegetation states (F = 25.433,
2
The herbivore analysis on the 2009 JER samples also showed p < 0.001, r = 0.556) the highest recorded value among all sample
very distinct groupings of species with vegetation (Fig. 2b). The locations (H = 0.978) and species evenness was slightly lower that
MRPP confirmed that there were significant differences in the the ecotone vegetation state sampled on the Jornada (E = 0.714)
nematode community associated with each vegetation state (over- but found not to be significant among sample locations (F = 0.194,
2
all: A = 0.430, p < 0.001; pairwise comparisons: dune vs. ecotone p = 0.900, r = 0.010). Herbivore communities were found to be very
A = 0.174, p < 0.001; dune vs. grassland: A = 0.473, p < 0.001; eco- similar among Otero Mesa and JER black grama grassland sam-
2
tone vs. grassland: A = 0.430, p < 0.001). Axis 1 (r = 0.169) and Axis 2 ples (Fig. 3b) and the pairwise comparison of MRPP scores indicate
2
(r = 0.063) cumulatively accounted for 23.1% of the variance asso- that these two communities are not significantly different (overall:
ciated with the herbivore species data, where the addition of a A = 0.125, p = <0.001; pairwise comparisons: dune vs. OM: A = 0.179,
2
third axis (r = −0.014) provided no additional information. Herbi- p < 0.001; grassland vs. OM: A = 0.004, p = 0.301; ecotone vs. OM:
vore diversity was significantly different among vegetation states A = 0.052, p = 0.017). Again, two distinct Tylenchinae genera were
2
(F = 7.836, p = 0.002, r = 0.359) with the highest in the ecotone observed and enumerated separately. Variation increased with the
vegetation state (H = 1.24) followed by the black grama grass- inclusion of the Otero Mesa samples, where the first and higher axes
2 2
land (H = 0.639) and the mesquite duneland (H = 0.542). Herbivore accounted for minimal variance (Axis 1, r = 0.07, Axis 2, r = 0.06,
2
species evenness was found to be significantly different among Axis 3, r = −0.04). The Otero Mesa soils had the highest measure
2
vegetation states (F = 4.235, p = 0.025, r = 0.232) and highest in of herbivore species diversity of all samples analyzed (H = 1.242)
the ecotone (E = 0.850) and lowest in the black grama grassland and species evenness was relatively high as well (E = 0.776). When
(E = 0.558) with evenness in the mesquite duneland intermediate Otero Mesa samples were compared with the Jornada herbivore
between the other two vegetation states (E = 0.0603). species diversity and evenness analysis, all vegetation states were
2
The desertification gradient sampled on the JER in 2010 showed found to significantly differ (H: F = 25433, p < 0.001, r = 0.556; E:
2
results similar to the 2009 sampling in that nematode communities F = 5.966, p = 0.001, r = 0.242).
were found to be significantly different among the three vegetation When the two sampling years of the desertification gradient
states except with the ecotone and mesquite duneland compar- on the JER were combined to form a composite data set, the same
ison were not significantly different, as indicated by the MRPP general patterns were observed as in the individual sampling year
(overall: A = 0.158, p < 0.001; pairwise comparisons: dune vs. eco- analyses—e.g., significant differences in both trophic and herbi-
tone: A = 0.030, p = 0.064; dune vs. grassland: A = 0.230, p < 0.001; vore groupings among vegetation states (Fig. 4a and b; Trophic
grassland vs. ecotone: 0.088, p = 0.006). Trophic diversity was sig- MRPP Analysis: overall: A = 0.190, p < 0.001; pairwise comparisons:
nificantly different among vegetation states (F = 6.066, p = 0.005, dune vs. ecotone, A = 0.066, p = 0.001; dune vs. grassland, A = 0.254,
2
r = 0.205) and highest in the ecotone (H = 0.952) as was even- p < 0.001; ecotone vs. grassland: A = 0.095, p < 0.001; Herbivore
ness (E = 0.740). B. eriopoda grassland trophic diversity was found MRPP Analysis: overall: A = 0.127, p < 0.001; pairwise comparisons:
to be intermediate in both diversity and evenness (H = 0.742; dune vs. ecotone: A = 0.084, p < 0.001, dune vs. grassland: A = 0.129,
E = 0.684) between the ecotone and mesquite duneland (H = 0.580; p < 0.001; ecotone vs. grassland: A = 0.075, p < 0.001). The variation
2
E = 0.647) where there evenness was not significant among all three explained was only relegated to Axis 1 and Axis 2 (Axis 1, r = 0.06,
2 2 2
vegetation states (F = 0,228, p = 0.797, r = 0.010). Herbivore sam- Axis 2, r = 0.044, Axis 3, r = −0.03). There was some inter-annual
pling also showed distinct nematode communities associated with variability in nematode communities from one year to the next,
vegetation state (Fig. 4b; overall: A = 0.158, p < 0.001; pairwise com- with the 2009 sampling year yielding significantly more nematodes
parisons: dune vs. ecotone A = 0.090, p = 0.001; dune vs. grassland: in both trophic (Wilk’s Lambda, F = 3.937, Value = 0.514, p = 0.007)
A = 0.214, p < 0.001; ecotone vs. grassland: A = 0.053, p = 0.012). The and herbivore (Wilk’s Lambda, F = 2.903, Value = 0.699, p = 0.040)
2010 samples yielded two predominant genera within the sub- analyses for the dune vegetation state as well as the herbivore
family Tylenchinae that were classified separately. However, little analysis for the ecotone (Wilk’s Lambda, F = 2.714, Value = 0.409,
J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77 71
Fig. 2. DCA of nematode trophic (a) and herbivore sampling (b) of the JER desertification gradient in 2009. Nematode species DCA scores are represented as vectors on the
bottom panels for both trophic and herbivore groupings.
p = 0.046) vegetation state where there were significantly more E = 0.679) and lastly the mesquite duneland site (Trophic, H = 0.651,
Criconemoides spp. (Value = 7.508; p = 0.012) and Hoplolaimus spp. E = 0.628; Herbivore, H = 0.340, E = 0.406). Trophic diversity was
(Value = 13.569; p = 0.001) were recovered in 2009 than 2010. found to be significantly different among vegetation states when
However, there were no significant differences observed in the the composite Jornada samples were compared (F = 9.236, p < 0.001,
2 2
nematode communities associated with the black grama grass- r = 0.190) but evenness was not (F = 1.238, p = 0.295, r = 0.030).
lands from one year to the next. The dune trophic analysis showed Overall, all three calculated ratios differed significantly among
that significantly greater numbers of bacteriovores (F = 15.451, the three vegetation states on the JER (Table 2). Post hoc
2 2
p < 0.001, r = 0.340), tylenchus (F = 9.793, p = 0.004, r = 0.246), and tests revealed that the FB ratio was significantly different
2
herbivores (F = 18.040, p < 0.001, r = 0.376) in 2009 than 2010 sam- between the black grama grassland and the mesquite duneland
ples and in the herbivore analysis there were significantly more (LSD, p = 0.006) with more fungivores present in the grassland
2
Meloidodera spp. (F = 11.317, p < 0.001, r = 0.303) in 2009 than in 2010.
Table 2
In the 2010 herbivore sampling, two distinctly different genera Univariate analysis of calculated nematode ratios from the Jornada for both 2009 and
of Tylenchinae were observed based on morphological characteris- 2010 sampling years combined as well as the Otero Mesa sampling from 2010: fungi-
vore:bacteriovore ratio (FB), herbivore:bacteriovore ratio (HB), and herbivore:total
tics, but have yet to be definitively classified. However, for purposes
nematode population ratio (HT). All calculated ratios significantly differed among all
of this analysis these two genera were combined into the com-
vegetation states along the desertification gradient and the undisturbed grassland
mon subfamily Tylenchinae due to similarity in trophic behavior. samples.
Trophic and herbivore species diversity and evenness was also con-
2
Ratio F p R
sistent with results from the 2009 analyses in that the ecotone
**
was found to be the most diverse (Trophic, H = 1.010; Herbivore, FB 12.886 <0.001 .213
**
HB 39.356 <0.001 .453
H = 1.028) as well as having the most evenly distributed species val- **
HT 38.134 <0.001 .445
ues (Trophic, E = 0.751; Herbivore, E = 1.144) followed by the black
**
Indicates significance at the ˛ = 0.001 level.
grama grassland (Trophic, H = 0.715, E = 0.749; Herbivore, H = 0.751,
72 J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77
Fig. 3. DCA of nematode trophic (a) and herbivore sampling (b) of the JER desertification gradient in 2010 as well as grassland samples from Otero Mesa sampling in 2010
as well. Nematode species DCA scores are represented as vectors on the bottom panels for both trophic and herbivore groupings.
vegetation state (dune = 0.096; ecotone = 0.273; grassland = 0.373). ecotone vegetation state (Table 3). The between subject effects of
The BH ratio differed among all vegetation states where signifi- the herbivore analysis did reveal a differences in the distribution of
2
cantly more bacteriovores were found in the dune (0.225) > ecotone Hoplolaimus species (F4,22 = 3.144, p = 0.040, r = 0.411) where post
(0.533) > grassland (0.714) (LSD, dune vs. grassland: p < 0.001, dune hoc tests showed significantly more species associated with sam-
vs. ecotone: p = 0.029, grassland vs. ecotone, p = 0.001). The HT ples taken from soils with co-occurring mesquite and black grama
ratio also showed significant differences in herbivorous nema- (LSD, p = 0.048). No significant differences were detected in the eco-
todes across all vegetation states with the most herbivores in tone trophic analysis among sampling locations (Table 3). However,
the grassland (0.232) > ecotone (0.369) > dune (0.649) (LSD, dune vs. bacteriovores were found to be significantly more prevalent within
grassland: p < 0.001, dune vs. ecotone: p = 0.023, grassland vs. eco- soils associated with P. glandulosa than B. eriopoda or where these
2
tone: p < 0.001). Because the data was log transformed to meet the species co-occurred (F4,23 = 5.904, p = 0.003, r = 0.550).
assumptions of ANOVA, post hoc tests were not performed because Only bacteriovore trophic groupings in dune vegetation were
at least one group had fewer than two cases. significantly different from interdune areas (F3,32 = 2.970, p = 0.049,
2
r = 0.241), and no overall effect of sample location was observed
3.2. Plant-interspace analysis (Table 3). However, when sampling location on the dune is not
accounted for and trophic groupings are compared between dune
The MANOVA analysis was conducted on both trophic and her- and interdune bare ground gap samples, numbers of bacteriovores
bivore nematode groupings analyzed across microsite locations and Tylenchinae genera differed significantly with fewer num-
among the vegetation states along the desertification gradient. bers in the interdune areas (Bacteriovores, F1,32 = 9.458, p = 0.004,
2 2
The grassland samples showed no significant differences in nema- r = 0.24; Tylenchinae, F1,32 = 7.081, p = 0.012, r = 0.191). No omni-
tode trophic and herbivore groupings among black grama patches, vores, fungivore, or carnivores were found in the interdune areas
soil gaps with soil biotic crusts, and bare ground across loca- and herbivores were lower when compared with the mesquite
tions (Table 3). Multivariate tests showed no differences in trophic dune nematode community. Herbivore communities were signif-
and herbivore groupings among sampling locations within the icantly different among samples taken from the mesquite dune
J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77 73
Fig. 4. DCA of nematode trophic (a) and herbivore sampling (b) of the JER desertification gradient in 2010 and grassland samples from the Otero Mesa sampling in 2010.
Nematode species DCA scores are represented as vectors on the bottom panels for both trophic and herbivore groupings.
and the interdune areas as well (Table 3). Only four species of Paratylenchus spp. was found in the interdune areas, and low recov-
the nine genera of herbivores identified throughout the desertifi- ery of this genus within the dune itself failed to support significant
cation gradient (Meloidodera, Tylenchorhynchus, Paratylenchus, and differences among locations.
Tylenchinae) resided within the dune vegetation state. All nema-
tode herbivores associated with the dune vegetation state occurred 4. Discussion
in much lower numbers, if at all, within interdune areas. Num-
bers of Tylenchorhynchus spp. were significantly lower in interdune The extensive biodiversity retained within soils is fundamen-
areas (LSD, p = 0.034) as were Tylenchinae spp. (LSD, p = 0.020). No tal to maintain plant productivity, yet soils as a living natural
Table 3
MANOVA analysis of the effects of sampling location for each of the three vegetation states on nematode groupings along the desertification gradient on the JER using Wilk’s
Lambda. Numbers within parentheses in the dune vegetation are indicative of nematode communities where the multivariate analysis did not account for dune architecture
and only relegated samples to either dune or interdune samples.
Vegetation Analysis F Value df p
Trophic 0.810 0.716 15 0.664
Grassland
Herbivore 0.720 0.718 64 0.764
Trophic 1.348 0.176 24 0.184
Ecotone
Herbivore 1.435 0.066 32 0.135
Trophic 1.162 (2.008) 0.457 (0.675) 18 (6) 0.318 (0.103)
Dune *
Herbivore 2.123 (0.904) 0.340 (0.717) 15 (10) 0.019 (0.537)
*
Indicates significance at the ˛ = 0.05 level.
74 J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77
resource are often ignored in issues of state changes where only black grama grasslands, aiding in drought tolerance, and enhancing
rudimentary knowledge of soil biotic diversity is known for a few nutrient uptake from shallow calcareous soils. Coupled with these
ecosystem types (Brussaard et al., 1997; Wall and Virginia, 1999; effects, plant parasitic nematodes are involved in the transfer of
Bardgett et al., 2005; Sylvain and Wall, 2011). Our analysis of photosynthetically fixed carbon and organic compounds into the
nematode community structure supports the hypotheses that the rhizosphere that affect nutrient dynamics and microbial biomass
desertification of B. eriopoda grasslands through the encroachment that ultimately have the potential to have ecosystem level effects
by mesquite shrubs has altered nematode communities, and (Ingham and Coleman, 1983; Ingham et al., 1985; Bardgett et al.,
caused them to become more heterogeneous and less diverse. 1998; Yeates, 1999). The sheer number of plant parasitic nema-
Increases in bare ground gaps that accompany desertification have todes found to reside within the black grama grasslands sampled
relegated the majority of nematodes to communities associated in this study does not appear to be severely impacting the produc-
with vegetated patches. Furthermore, the incidence of specific tion of these grasslands, especially those occurring on Otero Mesa.
nematode genera aligning with vegetation states along our deser- However, the coupled affect of large herbivorous nematode pop-
tification gradient support the “fungal loop” model proposed to ulations, drought, intermittent disturbances, and low fecundity of
translocate C, N, P, and mineral nutrients among resources patches black grama (Peters, 2002b) could combine to have a detrimental
and sustain ecosystem productivity in similar grassland systems effect on black grama and may be attributing to the desertification
(Collins et al., 2008; Green et al., 2008). of this arid grassland. Further information is needed to quantify the
larger impacts of plant parasitic nematodes on plant production in
4.1. Desertification effect this system and natural systems as a whole.
The high nematode diversity observed in the ecotone can be 4.2. Plant-interspace effects
explained by ecological niche partitioning. Increases in resources
due to multiple plant life forms (grasses and shrubs) may have With the lowest observed diversity and reduced numbers of her-
provided more microhabitats and energy channels for increased bivores genera, significant decline in bacteriovores, as well as the
nematode diversity and subsequently, soil biota that has increased absence of Tylenchinae, omnivores, fungivores, and carnivores with
functional redundancy caused by decreases in competitive exclu- the interdune areas compared with mesquite dunes themselves
sion (Armstrong and McGehee, 1980; Freckman and Virginia, 1989). illustrates the influence of vegetation on nematode community
Less diverse, more specialized nematode communities diverge structure. The loss in connected vegetation and increases in inter-
from ecotone community assemblages and align with the vegeta- space gaps characteristic of the desertification of arid grasslands
tion specific to either B. eriopoda or P. glandulosa and occupy specific has caused nematode abundance to become patchier. This frag-
functional roles resulting in increased competition. mentation has undoubtedly affected prey guilds as indicated by
Our results show that once P. glandulosa has encroached on, and nematode community assemblages and their spatial distributions
replaced areas previously dominated by grasses, the species guild of within the shrub dominated vegetation state (Fierer and Jackson,
herbivorous nematodes is dominated by very specific species with 2006; Housman et al., 2007). Due to limitations in their coloniza-
relatively few remaining representatives of the B. eriopoda grass- tion abilities, nematode community assemblages are indicative
land. Furthermore, trophic complexity becomes largely relegated of shifts in species dominance and because of their central role
to first order grazers (bacteriovores) in the dunelands and becomes in food-web dynamics, these changes in nematode community
highly dependent on the spatial distribution of fragmented vege- assemblages serve as a corollary for changes in the soil biotic con-
tation patches. These shifts in dominance to a few genera signify sortia once shrubs become dominant further altering ecosystem
alterations in plant–soil biotic associations within the differing veg- processes (Kardol et al., 2005).
etation states. However, it is not clear how this change in the soil The high proportion of bacterial feeding nematodes found
biotic community becomes initiated or what the direct effects to within the mesquite vegetation state has the potential to severely
the plant community. alter the nutrient dynamics, especially nitrogen, both directly
Further support for nematode communities aligning with and indirectly and may be accentuating the “islands of fertility”
vegetation distributions is apparent in the lack of significant observed by Schlesinger et al. (1990). Studies have shown that dis-
differences between herbivore communities from the JER black turbance has lead to shifts in the microbivorous nematodes from
grama sites and the Otero Mesa black grama grassland sam- predominantly fungivores to predominantly bacteriovores mirror-
ples. High diversity observed within the Otero Mesa site may be ing energy channel shifts (Hendrix et al., 1986; Moore and de Ruiter,
related to the lack of impact from long-term grazing combined 1991; Darby et al., 2010). These shifts are important because nema-
with a more stable geomorphic surface. Because these two sites todes directly secrete ammonium as a byproduct of metabolism
are geographically separated by approximately 160 km, yet har- of prey guilds that possess lower C:N ratios than required by
bor similar herbivore/plant-parasitic communities, illustrates the nematodes themselves (Neher, 2010). This excess nitrogen is read-
broad landscape-scale distribution patterns of nematode com- ily available for plant uptake but also can stimulate increased
munities in the Southwest and are perhaps indicative of the growth of microbial populations and lead to enhanced microbial
importance of soil biofeedbacks in semi-arid grasslands. turnover and dispersal where moderate grazing by nematodes can
Native plants are more resistant and tolerant to nematode par- even further stimulate microbial growth (Yeates, 1999; Neher,
asitism when compared to plants grown in agricultural settings 2010). Increased N mineralization rates in the bacterial decom-
based on evolutionary histories and co-evolution, competition, position channel compared to the fungal decomposition channel
arbuscular mycorrhizae and endophytic fungi that act as biocon- lead to greater losses of nitrogen through volatilization. Therefore,
trol agents (Wallace, 1987; Neher, 2010). Furthermore, lateral root systems with high bacterial populations may be prone to large
production has been shown by plants responding to herbivory nitrogen deficits when compared with other soil microbial systems
by nematode populations along with increased root exudation (Peterjohn and Schlesinger, 1991; Darby et al., 2010; Neher, 2010).
that can affect plant nutrient uptake as well as nutrient cycling The fungivore to bacteriovore ratio (FB ratio) has been widely
(Freckman and Virginia, 1989; Moore et al., 2003). Also, wound- accepted to yield insight into the successional stage of the decom-
ing of roots by nematodes may provide increased infection sites poser community. However, the incidence of the translocation of
for symbiotic fungal infections to occur (Freckman and Virginia, C from plant patches to adjacent crust patches via DSF and sapro-
1989), thus perpetuating the connectivity among plant patches in torphic fungi and with the biotic fixation, increased mineralization
J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77 75
and mobilization of N by the cyannobacterial component of crusts, Tylenchinae community. Also, DSF endophyte extensions from
the FB ratio is indicative of other process outside of decomposition black grama patches involved in the translocation of C and N
(Evans and Ehleringer, 1993; Hawkes, 2003; Green et al., 2008). As are linked to soil biotic crusts in plant-interspaces reinforcing the
the interactions of fungi and environmental conditions above and even distribution of Tylenchinae among vegetated and bare-ground
below ground limit organic nutrient accumulation, the net effects patches (Green et al., 2008). We acknowledge that Tylenchinae are
of a highly connected ecosystem exist in a tightly integrated sys- not feeding on the traditional AMF and ectomycorrhizal energy
tem of primary producers and heterotrophs (Collins et al., 2008; channels as many indices suggest, but feed on the endophytic dark
Crenshaw et al., 2008). While nutrient levels in black grama grass- septate fungi and soil biotic crust components of these semi arid
lands are much lower when compared with duneland vegetation grasslands (Kohn and Stasovski, 1990; Barrow, 1997; Barrow et al.,
patches, the increased connectivity among vegetation patches and 2004; Porra-Alfaro et al., 2008; Herrera et al., 2010). These fac-
biotic crusts in arid grasslands has the potential to retain nutrients tors led us to calculate the FB ratio in this study after classifying
and positively feedback amongst the biotic pathways classified by members of the Tylenchinae as fungivores.
the fungal loop model and distribution of soil biota.
5. Summary and conclusion
4.3. Interpretation of Tylenchinae
While many unknowns exist in the evaluation of nematode
In this study, members of the subfamily Tylenchinae accounted
populations within natural systems, previous research along with
for 16% and 17% of the soil nematode communities in 2009 and
results from this study provide information in the role of soil biota
2010, respectively. Other studies have shown that the Tylenchi-
in desertification of arid grasslands. The shift in soil community
nae account for up to 30% of such communities (Okada and Kadota,
structure and the subsequent change in soil biotic energy path-
2003). Differing trophic classifications have important implications
ways, associated with desertification can lead to ecosystem level
when summarizing the ecological roles of Tylenchinae or when
alterations of nutrient cycling and changes in aboveground pro-
using indices based on arbitrarily assigned trophic classifications
duction (Bardgett et al., 1998). As desertification increases, soil
to assess soil quality, ecosystem function, nutrient cycling, and the
biotic populations become less diverse and more heterogeneously
impact of disturbance (Wright and Coleman, 2000). Tylenchinae are
distributed in vegetation patches that further alter nutrient dynam-
not generally considered to be significant root parasites and their
ics on an ecosystem scale (Schlesinger et al., 1990). Furthermore,
relative prominence in this study may provide more information as
loss of the associated soil biotic consortia that is intimately tied
an indicator of specific ecosystem processes such as the fungal loop
to ecosystem function of semi-arid grasslands may have real and
hypothesis (Siddiqi, 2000; Collins et al., 2008). As nematodes play a
long-term consequences for the sustainability and recovery of B.
central role in soil food web dynamics, nematode assemblages are
eriopoda grasslands.
distributed in patches centered on available resources.
A more diverse trophic structure, as observed in the Otero
It appears that desertification may disrupt vital plant–soil inter-
Mesa soils, may be indicative of stability in ecosystem interac-
actions that are characteristic of B. eriopoda grasslands where
tions between roots and the fungal and bacterial energy channels
Tylenchinae feed mainly upon fungi, algae, and lichens and where
(Moore et al., 2003). Dominance of any one energy channel might
there are no differences in the distribution of this subfamily
be indicative of dynamic instability as observed within the JER
between vegetated patches and plant-interspaces in these grass-
grassland (fungal) and the mesquite duneland (bacterial), where
lands (Siddiqi, 2000; Okada et al., 2005). However, in vegetated
unimpeded vertical energy flow may provide increased nutrient
mesquite dunes Tylenchinae numbers were significantly lower
supplies, nutrient imbalance or losses, and a change in facilitative
than in black grama grasslands and virtually absent from inter-
soil biotic communities vital to plant production and resilience in
dunal areas in the mesquite dominated vegetation state that is
arid systems (Moore et al., 2003; Darby et al., 2007, 2010). How-
essentially void of soil biotic crusts and provides further evidence
ever, the dominance of the fungal energy channel in black grama
of the disruption of vital soil biofeedbacks by desertification and
grasslands on the Jornada may be indicative of a fully functioning,
shrub establishment. If Tylenchinae were feeding primarily on
connected system of hyphal networks, plant patches and soil biotic
higher plants in these arid systems, we would expect the com-
crusts.
munities to be similar among vegetation states or at least among
Linking nematode populations and trophic structure to function
vegetated patches. Furthermore, mesquite dunes contain an assort-
at individual plant scales is more complex than just enumera-
ment of associated plants such as saltbush (Atriplex canescens),
tion and identification because of their central role in food webs
broom snakeweed (Gutiereza sarothrae), dropseeds (Sporobolus
and connections to ecological processes in soil (Neher, 2010). In
spp.), threeawns (Aristida spp.), and a variety of forbs that serve
order for nematode community and trophic analyses to be more
as food sources for herbivorous nematodes (Peters and Gibbens,
useful, a more complete understanding of feeding habits and tol-
2006). The greater abundance of Tylenchinae where soil biotic
erance levels of each dominant nematode genus to abiotic stresses
crusts are present reinforces grouping Tylenchinae separately from
are needed before soil nematode community indices can be inter-
other conventional herbivore genera and supports their utilization
preted and calibrated accurately as indicators of arid land soil
of photosynthetically active algal and cyannobacterial lichenous
condition, function, and soil biotic interactions (Darby et al., 2007).
components as well as the fungal symbiont that comprise these
This improved understanding will require improved species level
crusts as substrate opposed to feeding largely as true parasites of
identification using morphological and molecular criteria, where
higher plants.
life history information relating to specific environments can be
While some members of the Tylenchinae may occasionally feed
applied to community level surveys.
as herbivores, as their low numbers within the mesquite dunes that
are void of soil biotic crusts may indicate, we believe that the abun-
dance of the Tylenchinae community in sites lacking vascular plants Acknowledgements
is indicative that they are typically not feeding as conventional
herbivores in this study. The consolidated matrices of soil biotic We would like to thank the Nematology Lab at New Mexico
crusts characteristic of areas vegetated with black grama and the State University for their assistance in data collection and sam-
plant-interspaces between create a more homogenous, connected ple processing, Dr. Ernest Bernard, and Zachary Sylvain for critical
cover in the grasslands allowing for a more evenly distributed review of our manuscript. Funding support was provided by the
76 J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77
National Science Foundation to New Mexico State University as part Herrera, J., Khidir, H.H., Eudy, D.M., Porras-Alfaro, A., Natvig, D.O., Sinsabaugh, R.L.,
2010. Shifting fungal endophyte communities colonize Bouteloua gracilis: effect
of the Jornada Basin Long Term Ecological Research Program (DEB-
of host tissue and geographical distribution. Mycologia 102, 1012–1026.
0618210) and the New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station.
Herrick, J.E., Bestelmeyer, B.T., Archer, S., Tugel, A.J., Brown, J.R., 2005. An inte-
grated framework for science-based arid land management. J. Arid Environ. 65,
319–335.
References Hochstrasser, T.G., Kroel-Dulay, Peters, D.P.C., Gosz, J.R., 2002. Vegetation and cli-
mate characteristics of arid and semiarid grasslands in North America and their
biome transition zone. J. Arid Environ. 51, 55–78.
Abrahams, A.D., Parsons, A.J., Wainwright, J., 1995. Effects of vegetation change
Housman, D.C., Yeager, C.M., Darby, B.J., Sanford, R.L., Kuske, C.R., Neher, D.A., Bel-
on interill runoff and erosion, Walnut Gulch, southern AZ. Geomorphology 13,
37–48. nap, J., 2007. Heterogeneity of soil nutrients and subsurface biota in a dryland
ecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 2138–2149.
Archer, S., 1994. Woody plant encroachment into southwestern grasslands and
Ingham, R.E., Coleman, D.C., 1983. Effects of an ectoparasitic nematode on bacterial
savannas: rates, patterns, and proximate causes. In: Vacra, M., Laycock, W.,
growth in gnotobiotic soil. Oikos 41, 227–232.
Pieper, R. (Eds.), Ecological Implications of Livestock Herbivory in the West.
Ingham, R.E., Trofymow, J.A., Ingham, E.R., Coleman, D.C., 1985. Interactions of bac-
Society for Range Management, Denver, CO, pp. 13–68.
teria, fungi, and their nematode grazers: effects on nutrient cycling and plant
Armstrong, R.A., McGehee, R., 1980. Competitive exclusion. Am. Nat. 115, 151–170.
growth. Ecol. Monogr. 55, 119–140.
Bardgett, R.D., Wardle, D.A., Yeates, G.W., 1998. Linking above-ground and below-
Jenkins, W.R., 1964. A rapid centrifugal flotation technique for separating nematodes
ground interactions: how plant responses to foliar herbivory influence soil
from soil. Plant Dis. Rep. 48, 692.
organisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 1867–1878.
Kardol, P., Bezemer, T.M., van der Wal, A., van der Putten, W.H., 2005. Successional
Bardgett, R.D., Yeates, G.W., Anderson, J.M., 2005. Patterns and Determinants of Soil
trajectories of soil nematode and plant communities in a chronosequence of
Biological Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
ex-arable lands. Biol. Conserv. 126, 317–327.
Barrow, J.R., 1997. Processing of mycrobacterial lipids and effects on host respon-
Kéfi, S., Rietkerk, M., Alados, C.L., Pueyo, Y., Papanastasis, V.P., Elaich, A., de Ruite,
siveness. Front. Biosci. 2, 387–400.
P.C., 2007. Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediter-
Barrow, J.R., Osuna-Avila, P., Reyes-Vera, I., 2004. Fungal endophytes intrinsically
ranean arid ecosystems. Nature 44, 213–216.
associated with micropropagated plants regenerated from native Bouteloua eri-
Kohn, L., Stasovski, I., 1990. The mycorrhizal status of plants at Alexandra Fiord,
opoda Torr. and Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 40,
608–612. Ellensmere Island, Canada, a high Arctic Site. Mycologia 82, 23–35.
Klironomos, J.N., McCune, J., Hart, M., Neville, J., 2000. The influence of arbuscular
Bestelmeyer, B.T., Ward, J.P., Havstad, K.M., 2006. Soil-geomorphic heterogeneity
mycorrhizae on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity. Ecol.
governs patchy vegetation dynamics at an arid ecotone. Ecology 87, 963–973.
Lett. 3, 137–141.
Belnap, J., 1996. Soil surface disturbances in cold deserts: effects on nitrogenase
Lucero, M.E., Barrow, J.R., Osuna, P., Reyes, I., 2006. Plant–fungal interactions in arid
activity in cyanobacterial-lichen soil crusts. Biol. Fertil. Soils 23, 362–367.
and semi-arid ecosystems: large-scale impacts from microscale processes. J. Arid
Belnap, J., 2003. The world at your feet: desert biological soil crusts. Front. Ecol.
Environ. 65, 276–284.
Environ. 1, 181–189.
Lucero, M., Barrow, J., Osuna-Avila, P., Reyes-Vera, I., Duke, S., 2008. Enhancing native
Bever, J.D., Westover, K.M., Antonovics, J., 1997. Incorporating the soil community
grass productivity by co-cultivating with endophyte-laden calli. Rangeland Ecol.
into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. J. Ecol. 85,
561–573. Manage. 61, 124–130.
McCune, B., Mefford, M.J., 2006. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data.
Bongers, T., Ferris, H., 1999. Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in
Version 5.32. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.
environmental monitoring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 224–228.
Mills, K.E., Bever, J.D., 1998. Maintenance of diversity within plant communities: soil
Bongers, T., 1999. The maturity index, the evolution of nematode life history traits,
pathogens as agents of negative feedback. Ecology 79, 1595–1601.
adaptive radiation and cp-scaling. Plant Soil 212, 13–22.
Molofsky, J., 1994. Population dynamics and pattern formation in theoretical popu-
Bongers, T., Bongers, M., 1998. Functional diversity of nematodes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10,
239–251. lations. Ecology 75, 30–39.
Molofsky, J., Bever, J.D., Antonovics, J., 2001. Coexistence under positive frequency
Brussaard, L., Behan-Pelletier, V.M., Bignell, D.E., Brown, V.K., Didden, W., Folgarait,
dependence. R. Soc. 268, 272–277.
P., Fragoso, C., et al., 1997. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in soil. Ambio
Monger, H.C., Mack, G.H., Nolen, B.A., Gile, L.H., 2006. Regional setting of the Jornada
26, 563–570.
Basin. In: Havstad, K.M., Huenneke, L.F., Schlesinger, W.H. (Eds.), Structure and
Byrd, D.W., Barker, K.R., Ferris, H., Nusbaum, C.J., Griffin, W.E., Small, R.H., Stone,
Function of a Chihuahuan Desert Ecosystem. Oxford University Press, Inc., New
C.A., 1976. Two semi-automatic elutriators for extracting nematodes and certain
York, pp. 15–43.
fungi from soil. J. Nematol. 8, 206–212.
Moore, J.C., de Ruiter, P.C., 1991. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of trophic inter-
Cai, L., 2006. Multi-response permutation procedure as an alternative to the analysis
actions within below-ground food webs. Agric. Ecosyst. Manage. 34, 371–397.
of variance: an SPSS implementation. Behav. Res. Methods 38, 51–59.
Moore, J.C., McCann, K., Setala, H., de Rutter, P.C., 2003. Top-down is bottom-up:
Collins, S.L., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Crenshaw, C., Green, L., Porras-Alfaro, A., Stursova, M.,
does predation in the rhizosphere regulate aboveground dynamics? Ecology 84,
Zeglin, L.H., 2008. Pulse dynamics and microbial processes in aridland ecosys-
846–857.
tems. J. Ecol. 96, 413–420.
Neher, D.A., 2010. Ecology of plant and free-living nematodes in natural and agri-
Crenshaw, C., Lauber, C.L., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Stavely, L.K., 2008. Fungal control of
cultural soil. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 48, 371–394.
nitrous oxide production in semiarid grassland. Biogeochemistry 87, 17–27.
O’Hanlon-Manners, D.L., Kotanen, P.M., 2004. Evidence that fungal pathogens inhibit
Darby, B.J., Housman, D.C., Zaki, A.M., Shamount, Y., Adl, S.M., Belnap, J., Neher,
recruitment of shade-intolerant tree, white birch (Betula popyrifera) in under-
D.A., 2006. Effects of altered temperature and precipitation on desert protozoa
story habitats. Oecologia 140, 650–653.
associated with biological soil crusts. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 53, 507–514.
Ogle, K., Reynolds, J.F., 2004. Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosys-
Darby, B.J., Neher, D.A., Belnap, J., 2007. Soil nematode communities are ecologically
tems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays. Oecologia 141,
more mature beneath late-than early-successional stage biological crusts. Appl.
282–294.
Soil Ecol. 35, 203–212.
Okada, H., Tsukiboshi, T., Kadota, I., 2002. Mycetophagy in Filenchus misellus
Darby, B.J., Neher, D.A., Belnap, J., 2010. Impact of biological soil crusts and desert
(Andrássy, 1958) Lownsbery & Lownsberry, 1985 (Nematoda: Tylenchidae),
plants on soil microfaunal community composition. Plant Soil 328, 421–431.
with notes on its morphology. Nematology 4, 795–801.
Evans, R.D., Ehleringer, J.R., 1993. A break in the nitrogen cycle of aridlands: evidence
15 Okada, H., Kadota, I., 2003. Host status of 10 fungal isolates for two nematode species,
from ␦ N of soils. Oecologia 94, 314–317.
Filenchus misellus and Aphelenchus avenae. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 1601–1607.
Evans, R.D., Belnap, J., 1999. Long-term consequences of disturbance on nitrogen
Okada, H., Harada, H., Kadota, I., 2005. Fungal-feeding habits of six nematode isolates
dynamics in an arid ecosystem. Ecology 8, 150–160.
in the genus Filenchus. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 1113–1120.
Ferris, H., Bongers, T., De Goede, R.G.M., 2001. A framework for soil web diagnostics:
Okin, G.S., Gillette, D.A., Herrick, J.E., 2006. Multi-scale controls on and consequences
extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Appl. Soil Ecol. 18, 13–29.
of Aeolian processes in landscape change in arid and semi-arid environments. J.
Fierer, N., Jackson, R.B., 2006. The diversity of biogeogrpahy of soil bacterial com-
Arid Environ. 65, 253–275.
munities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sc. U.S.A. 103, 626–631.
Parsons, A.J., Wainwright, J., Abrahams, A.D., Simanton, J.R., 1997. Distributed
Freckman, D.W., Virginia, R.A., 1989. Plant-feeding nematodes in deep-rooting
dynamic modeling of interrill overland flow. Hydrol. Process. 11, 1833–1859.
desert ecosystems. Ecology 70, 1665–1678.
Peters, D.P.C., Bestelmeyer, B.T., Herrick, J.E., Monger, H.C., Fredrickson, E., Havstad,
Garcia-Pichel, F., Johnson, S.L., Youngkin, D., Belnap, J., 2003. Small-scale vertical
K.M., 2006. Disentangling complex landscapes: new insights to forecasting arid
distribution of bacterial biomass and diversity in biological soil crusts from arid
and semiarid system dynamics. BioScience 56, 491–501.
lands in the Colorado Plateau. Microbial Ecol. 46, 312–321.
Peters, D.P.C., Gibbens, R.P., 2006. Plant communities in the Jornada Basin: the
Gibbens, R.P., McNeely, R.P., Havstad, K.M., Beck, R.F., Nolen, B., 2005. Vegetation
dynamic landscape. In: Havstad, K.M., Huenneke, L.F., Schlesinger, W.H. (Eds.),
change in the Jornada Basin 1858 to 1998. J. Arid Environ. 61, 651–668.
Structure and Function of a Chihuahuan Desert Ecosystem. Oxford University
Green, L.E., Porras-Alfaro, A., Sinsabaugh, R.L., 2008. Translocation of nitrogen and
Press, Inc., New York, pp. 211–231.
carbon integrates biotic crust and grass production in desert grasslands. J. Ecol.
Peters, D.P.C., 2002a. Plant species dominance at a grassland-shrubland ecotone: an
96, 1076–1085.
individual-based gap dynamics model of herbaceous and woody species. Ecol.
Hawkes, C.V., 2003. Nitrogen cycling mediated by biological soil crusts and arbus-
Model. 152, 5–32.
cular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84, 1553–1562.
Peters, D.P.C., 2002b. Recruitment potential of two perennial grasses with dif-
Hendrix, P.F., Pamelee, R.W., Crossley Jr., D.A., Coleman, D.C., Odum, E.P., Groffman,
ferent growth forms at a semiarid–arid transition zone. Am. J. Bot. 89,
P.M., 1986. Detritus food webs in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems.
1616–1623.
Bioscience 36, 374–380.
J.R. Klass et al. / Applied Soil Ecology 58 (2012) 66–77 77
Peterjohn, W.T., Schlesinger, W.H., 1991. Factors controlling denitrification in a Chi- Schlesinger, W.H., Reynolds, J.F., Cunningham, G.L., Huenneke, L., Jarrel, W.M., Vir-
huahuan Desert ecosystem. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1694–1701. ginia, R.A., Whitford, W.G., 1990. Biological Feedbacks in global desertification.
Porra-Alfaro, A., Herrera, J., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Odenbach, K.J., Lowrey, T., Natvig, D.O., Science 247, 1043–1048.
2008. Novel root fungal consortium associated with a dominant desert grass. Siddiqi, M.R., 2000. Tylenchida: Parasites of Plants and Insects, 2nd ed. CABI Pub-
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 2805–2813. lishing, New York.
Porras-Alfaro, A., Herrera, J., Natvig, D.O., Sinsabaugh, R.L., 2007. Effect of long-term Sylvain, Z., Wall, D.H., 2011. Linking soil biodiversity and vegetation: implications
nitrogen fertilization on mycorrhizal fungi assocaited with a dominant grass in for a changing planet. Am. J. Bot. 98, 517–527.
a semiarid grassland. Plant Soil 296, 65–75. van der Putten, W.H., van Dijk, C., Peters, B.A.M., 1993. Plant-specific soil-borne
Porras-Alfaro, A., Herrera, J., Natvig, D.O., Lipinski, K., Sinsabaugh, R.L., 2011. diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation. Nature 362, 52–56.
Diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities in a semiarid grassland. Wainwright, J., Parsons, A.J., Abrahams, A.D., 2000. Plot-scale studies of vegetation,
Mycologia 103, 10–21. overland flow, and erosion interactions: case studies from Arizona and New
Ravi, S., D’Odorico, Okin, G.S., 2007. Hydrologic and aeolian controls on Mexico. Hydrol. Process. 14, 2921–2943.
vegetation patterns in arid landscapes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L24S23, Wall, D.H., Virginia, R.A., 1999. Controls on soil biodiversity: insights from extreme
doi:10.1029/2007GL031023. environments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 13, 137–150.
Reinhart, K.O., Packer, A., Van der Putten, W.H., Clay, K., 2003. Plant–soil biota inter- Wallace, H.R., 1987. Effects of nematode parasites on photosynthesis. In: Veech, J.A.,
actions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Dickson, D.W. (Eds.), Vistas on Nematology: a Commemoration of the Twenty-
Ecol. Lett. 6, 1046–1050. fifth Anniversary of the Society of Nematologists. Society of Nematologists,
Reinhart, K.O., Royo, A., van Der Putten, W.H., Clay, K., 2005. Soil feedback and Hyattsville, MD, pp. 253–259.
pathogen activity in Prunus serotina throughout its native range. J. Ecol. 93, Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Klironomos, J.N., Setälä, van der Putten, W.H., Wall, D.H.,
890–898. 2004. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science
Reynolds, J.F., Stafford Smith, M. (Eds.), 2002. Global Desertification: do humans 304, 1629–1633.
cause deserts? Dahlem Workshop Report 88. Dahlem University Press, Dahlem, Wright, C.J., Coleman, D.C., 2000. Cross-site comparison of soil microbial biomass,
Germany. soil nutrient status, and nematode trophic groups. Pedobiologia 44, 2–23.
Reynolds, J.F., Kemp, P.R., Ogle, K., Fernández, R.J., 2004. Modifying the ‘pulse- Whisenant, S.G., 1999. Repairing Damaged Wildlands: a Process-oriented,
reserve’ paradigm for deserts of North America: precipitation pulses, soil water, Landscape-scale Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
and plant responses. Oecologia 141, 194–210. Whitford, W.G., 1996. The importance of the biodiversity of soil biota in arid ecosys-
Ritz, K., Trudgill, 1999. Utility of nematode community analysis as an integrated tems. Biodivers. Conserv. 5, 185–195.
measure of the functional state of soils: perspectives and challenges. Plant Soil Yeates, G.W., Bongers, T., de Goede, G.M., Freckman, D.W., Georgieva, S.S., 1993.
212, 1–11. Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera-an outline for soil ecolo-
Scanlon, T.M., Caylor, K.K., Levin, S.A., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 2007. Positive feed- gists. J. Nematol. 25, 315–331.
backs promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation. Nature 449, Yeates, G.W., 1999. Effects of plants on nematode community structure. Annu. Rev.
209–213. Phytopathol. 37, 127–149.