DOCSLIB.ORG

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE for SETTLEMENT of INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. AMBIENTE UFFICIO S.P.A. and OTHERS (Case Formerly Kn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE for SETTLEMENT of INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. AMBIENTE UFFICIO S.P.A. and OTHERS (Case Formerly Kn INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. AMBIENTE UFFICIO S.P.A. AND OTHERS (Case formerly known as GIORDANO ALPI AND OTHERS1) (CLAIMANTS) and THE ARGENTINE REPUBLIC (RESPONDENT) (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9) DECISION ON JURISDICTION AND ADMISSIBILITY ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL Judge Bruno Simma, President Professor Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, Arbitrator Dr. Santiago Torres Bernárdez, Arbitrator Secretary of the Tribunal: Mrs. Anneliese Fleckenstein Assistant to the President of the Tribunal Dr. Andreas Th. Müller Representing the Claimants: Representing the Respondent: Avv. Piero G. Parodi, Dra. Angelina María Esther Abbona Avv. Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo and Procuradora del Tesoro de la Nación Argentina Prof. Abogado Rodolfo Carlos Barra Posadas 1641 – Piso 1 Via S. Maurilio 14 CP 1112 Buenos Aires 20123 Milan Argentina Italy Date: February 8, 2013 1 For the change of name, see infra para. 354. Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i ABBREVIATIONS OF THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES ............................................ vii FURTHER ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE DECISION ..................................................... viii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 PROCEDURAL HISTORY............................................................................................................ 5 FACTS OF THE CASE ................................................................................................................ 11 PRAYERS OF RELIEF ................................................................................................................ 13 I. CONSENT OF THE RESPONDENT .............................................................................. 16 A. Positions of the Parties ...................................................................................................... 16 1. Contentions by Respondent .......................................................................................... 16 a) The ICSID Convention does not authorize collective actions nor did Argentina consent to such proceedings in the Argentina-Italy BIT ........................................... 16 b) Claimants’ submission as to the nature of the action brought by them is not convincing .................................................................................................................. 20 c) Violation of fundamental principles of due process ................................................... 21 2. Contentions by Claimants ............................................................................................. 23 a) The nature of the action brought by the Claimants .................................................... 23 b) Possibility of bringing multi-party arbitrations before an ICSID tribunal without special consent of the Parties ........................................................................ 25 c) No risk for due process by admitting multi-party arbitrations ................................... 28 B. Findings of the Tribunal.................................................................................................... 29 1. The nature of the claim submitted to the Tribunal ........................................................ 29 a) The present action is not a “class action” and should not be referred to as a “mass proceeding” ..................................................................................................... 30 (1) The “class action” issue....................................................................................... 30 (2) The “mass claim” issue ....................................................................................... 32 b) The character of the present action as a “multi-party” proceeding ............................ 33 c) The present claim is not the result of a joinder of proceedings .................................. 34 2. Consent to multi-party proceedings within the framework of the ICSID Convention and the Argentina-Italy BIT ..................................................................... 35 a) Existence of the Parties’ consent to multi-party proceedings..................................... 36 b) Scope of the Parties’ consent to multi-party proceedings .......................................... 44 (1) The question of a maximum number of Claimants ............................................. 45 i Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9) (2) The question of the need of a link between the claims in dispute ....................... 46 3. Due process and manageability concerns ..................................................................... 51 II. CONSENT OF THE CLAIMANTS ................................................................................. 54 A. Positions of the Parties ...................................................................................................... 54 1. Contentions by Respondent .......................................................................................... 54 a) Lack of the signature of Claimants themselves .......................................................... 54 b) Lack of consent for ICSID arbitration in the Power of Attorney ............................... 54 c) Purported legal defects of the Power of Attorney and the NASAM Mandate ........... 55 (1) Purported legal defects of the Power of Attorney ............................................... 56 (2) Purported legal defects of the NASAM Mandate negatively affecting the Power of Attorney ............................................................................................... 57 (3) The nature of NASAM’s funding arrangement................................................... 58 2. Contentions by Claimants ............................................................................................. 58 a) Lack of the signature of Claimants themselves .......................................................... 58 b) Lack of consent for ICSID arbitration in the Power of Attorney ............................... 59 c) Purported legal defects of the Power of Attorney ...................................................... 60 (1) Purported legal defects of the Power of Attorney ............................................... 60 (2) Purported legal defects of the NASAM Mandate negatively affecting the Power of Attorney ............................................................................................... 62 (3) The nature of NASAM’s funding arrangement................................................... 63 B. Findings of the Tribunal.................................................................................................... 64 1. The prerequisite of written consent of Claimants ......................................................... 64 a) The structure of the legal problem .............................................................................. 65 (1) Written consent to submit the dispute pursuant to Art. 25 .................................. 65 (2) Submission of the request in writing pursuant to Art. 36.................................... 66 (3) Interplay of the two provisions in the case of expression of consent by instituting arbitral proceedings ............................................................................ 66 b) Application to the present case ................................................................................... 67 2. The question of the lack of Claimants’ signatures from the Request ........................... 69 3. The question of defects of the Power of Attorney given to Avv. Parodi ...................... 72 a) The purported invalidity of the Power of Attorney .................................................... 73 b) Purported defects in the scope of the Power of Attorney ........................................... 78 4. The questions of the lack of Avv. Parodi’s signature from the Request and of the authorization of Avv. Radicati di Brozolo to sign on his behalf ................................. 81 5. The role of NASAM in the present proceedings .......................................................... 87 ii Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9) III. NATIONALITY AND STANDING OF CLAIMANTS .................................................. 90 A. Positions of the Parties ...................................................................................................... 90 1. Contentions by Respondent .......................................................................................... 90 a) The nationality requirement under Art. 25 of the ICSID Convention and Art. 1(2) of the Argentina-Italy BIT ................................................................................. 90 b) Number and identity of the Claimants ........................................................................ 90 c) Lack of standing due to Claimants’ legal proceedings against the seller banks ......... 91 d) Lack of standing due to Claimants’ impermissible pursuing of claims on behalf of a third party in abuse of process ............................................................................ 91 2. Contentions by Claimants ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Government of the Republic of Macedonia 2017 Program
    GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Pursuant to Article 5 of the Law on Establishment of the Agency for Promotion and Support of Tourism (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” no. 103/2008, 156/10, 59/12, 187/13, and 41/2014), the Government of the Republic of Macedonia held a session on 17.10.2016 to adopt the following 2017 PROGRAM FOR PROMOTION AND SUPPORT OF TOURISM Article 1 This program is aimed at promotion and support for tourism in the Republic of Macedonia in 2017. The funds required for realization of the program have been set aside in the Budget of the Republic of Macedonia for 2017 and amount to 192,336,000.00 denars, of which 149,622,000.00 on account no. 637, 40,500,000.00 denars on account no. 631, and 2,214,000,00 denars on account no. 787; the funds have been planned in the budget under item 10003 – Agency for Promotion and Support of Tourism, category 42 – goods and services, category 46 – subsidies and transfers, and category 48 – capital expenses. Article 2 The funds of Article 1 paragraph 2 of this program are intended for promotional activities and activities of support of tourism, as follows: а) A total of 48,250,000.00 denars are intended for promotional activities, marketing, and international cooperation, as follows: 1. Preparation, printing, and distribution of printed promotional material, brochures prepared in 16 foreign languages, as follows: English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, Japanese, Russian, Polish, Dutch, Czech, Arabian, Chinese, Turkish, Bulgarian, Serbian, and Albanian, as well as preparation, printing, and distribution of guides, maps, and other promotional material (pens, scarves, ties, key chains, various glass products, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Country
    Arbitration Guide IBA Arbitration Committee GREECE May 2016 Antonias Dimolitsa Niki K. Kerameus A. DIMOLITSA & ASSOCIATES 11 Merlin Str. Athens, 10671 Greece [email protected] [email protected] Greece Table of Contents Page I. Background ..........................................................................................................................1 II. Arbitration Laws ..................................................................................................................2 III. Arbitration Agreements .......................................................................................................4 IV. Arbitrability and Jurisdiction ...............................................................................................6 V. Selection of Arbitrators ........................................................................................................7 VI. Interim Measures .................................................................................................................8 VII. Disclosure/Discovery ...........................................................................................................9 VIII. Confidentiality ...................................................................................................................10 IX. Evidence and Hearings ......................................................................................................10 X. Awards ...............................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Euthanasia and Criminal Law
    ISSN 2411-9563 (Print) European Journal of Social Science August 2018 ISSN 2312-8429 (Online) Education and Research Vol 5 No 2 DOI: 10.2478/ejser-2018-0042 Open Access. © 2018 Brunela Kullolli and .Ilrjan Hysa. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License Law and Society - Euthanasia and Criminal Law Dr. Brunela Kullolli “Aleksander Moisiu” University of Durres, Faculty of Political Sciences and Law Av.Ilrjan Hysa Studio Ligjore “I.S.K Law Firm ”, Durres Albania Abstract Euthanasia or "sweet death" is a topic that has sparked numerous debates throughout history. In Albania, the right to life is protected by Article 21 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania. Regarding the individual's right to die in Albania, both forms of euthanasia, the passive and the active one, are considered criminal offenses and are punishable by law. The problem lies in the fact that such a definition is not found in the Albanian legislation, but such actions are considered as criminal by the interpretation of the law. In this topic we will study the perception of Albanians regarding euthanasia and whether the Albanian legislation should include this form of soft death or not. The protection of life in the country should take the dimensions of a sustainable protection. For this reason, in addition to the positive effects of improving life protection that derive from the application of the entirety of the various criminal justice programs and policies, also including the recent amendments to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Albania, a concrete and continuous protection should be provided in support of the right to life.
    [Show full text]
  • Historyofhungary008338mbp.Pdf
    125996 Other J3aaks by Emerson IFosdiclc THE SECOND MILE THE ASSURANCE OF IM MO RTALITY THE 3VE ANHCOOD O DF THE MASTER. THE MEANING OF PRAYER. THE MEANING OF FAITH THE MEANING OF SERVICE CHRISTIANITY ANI> PROGRESS TWELVE TESTS OF CHARACTER THE MODERN USE OF THE BZKLE ADVENTUROUS RELIGION A PILGRIM AGE TO PALESTINE AS I SEE RELIGION THE HOPE OF THE ^VORLD THE SECRET OF VICTORIOUS LIVING THE POWER TO SEE IT THROUGH SUCCESSFUL CHRISTIAN LIVING A GUII>E TO UNDERSTANDING THE BIBL3 LIVING UNDER TENSION ON BEING A REAL PERSON A HISTORY OF HUNGARY IN BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES By IMRE LUKINICH, D.PH, Professor of the University of Budapest LONDON HUNGARY SIMPKIN MARSHALL LTD. DR. GEORGE VAJNA & CO. ** IV Stationers' Hall Court, E. C. 4 Vaci-utca, Budapest Translated from the Hungarian by CATHERINE DALLAS Copyright Jp57 by^Dr. George Vajna & Co. Budapest * Printed and made in Hungary by Athenaeum Ltd. Budapest CONTENTS Pages Prince , Arpid ^ ...-..,, ^ . ... M ... 5 St. Stephen ... ......, ... ^ ^ ... ^ ... ... _ ... w ... 15 St. Ladislas ... ... w . w . m w w w m 32 Coloman ^. King ^ ^ ..,.. ^. ... 46 Bela III King ... , ^ .., ^. ^ ^ 50 Be"la IV . ... ... King w w . w ^ ... , 59 the last line Andrew III, of the Arpdd .. .^ . w .,. ... 75 the . ... King Louis Great . ^. ........ 83 John Hunyadi, Regent of Hungary ... ^. -. w -. ... ~ . ^ ... 96 King Matthias . , w. ... ^. ^ . 113 Wladislas II and Louis II ... ... m ... w M ... ... , 119 Cardinal Martinuzzi (Friar George) .-.. ^. ... ^ M ... 134 and ... Stephen Bocskay, Prince of Hungary Transylvania . ... 140 Gabriel Bethlen, Prince of Transylvania ^ . w w . ^ ^ ^ 146 . ... ^. -. .- * ... , . ... Cardinal Peter Pdzmany , 153 ... 161 Count Nicholas Zrinyi, Soldier and Poet m w . ^ Francis Rak6czi II, Prince of Hungary and Transylvania w .
    [Show full text]
  • Download Prospectus
    ALKALOID AD - Skopje Prospectus PROSPECTUS ALKALOID AD Skopje – Pharmaceutical Chemical Cosmetic Industry, based in Skopje, with premises located at Boulevard Aleksandar Makedonski No.12, registered with the Principal Court Trade Registry in Skopje, Reg. No. 9409/95 Quotation of shares of ALKALOID AD Skopje on the Official Macedonian Stock Exchange Long-Term Securities Market JSC Skopje The request to authorize quotation of shares to ALKALOID AD has been lodged with the Official Macedonian Stock Exchange Long-Term Securities Market JSC in Skopje. The value per share shall be EUR 25.56. The request for quotation shall reflect the following types of shares: • 1,209,550 ordinary shares with voting rights, • 3,228 preferrence shares, without voting right, reserved for former proprietors, • 88,452 preference shares, held by the Pension and Disability Insurance Fund of the Republic of Macedonia, which shall by venture be transformed in ordinary shares. Prior to the listing on Official Market of the Macedonian Stock Exchange JSC, Skopje, ALKALOID’s shares were traded on the Unofficial Market of the Macedonian Stock Exchange. Listing activities were performed by MAKOS-INVESTBROKER JSC Skopje STOCKBROKER 20 Mito Hadživasilev-Jasmin Street, 2nd floor 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia 1 ALKALOID AD - Skopje Prospectus STATEMENT by the PRESIDENT The President of the Share Issuer’s Management Board shall undertake full responsibility related to the foregoing instrument referred to as the Prospectus: “We hereby acknowledge that we are fully acquainted with the data available herein, and claim that all data contained in the Prospectus shall be complete and unimpaired presentation of the assets, liabilities, profits and losses, Share Issuer’s financial and business status, accurate value of the securities and We renounce omission of any data that may influence the accuracy and veracity of this Prospectus”.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CENTRE for SETTLEMENT of INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. AMBIENTE UFFICIO S.P.A. and OTHERS (Case Formerly Kn
    INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. AMBIENTE UFFICIO S.P.A. AND OTHERS (Case formerly known as GIORDANO ALPI AND OTHERS1) (CLAIMANTS) and THE ARGENTINE REPUBLIC (RESPONDENT) (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9) DECISION ON JURISDICTION AND ADMISSIBILITY ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL Judge Bruno Simma, President Professor Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, Arbitrator Dr. Santiago Torres Bernárdez, Arbitrator Secretary of the Tribunal: Mrs. Anneliese Fleckenstein Assistant to the President of the Tribunal Dr. Andreas Th. Müller Representing the Claimants: Representing the Respondent: Avv. Piero G. Parodi, Dra. Angelina María Esther Abbona Avv. Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo and Procuradora del Tesoro de la Nación Argentina Prof. Abogado Rodolfo Carlos Barra Posadas 1641 – Piso 1 Via S. Maurilio 14 CP 1112 Buenos Aires 20123 Milan Argentina Italy Date: February 8, 2013 1 For the change of name, see infra para. 354. Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i ABBREVIATIONS OF THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES ............................................ vii FURTHER ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE DECISION ..................................................... viii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 PROCEDURAL HISTORY...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government of the Republic of Macedonia 2016 Program
    GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Pursuant to Article 5 of the Law on Establishment of the Agency for Promotion and Support of Tourism (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” no. 103/2008, 156/10, 59/12, 187/13, and 41/14), the Government of the Republic of Macedonia held a session on 5.1.2016 to adopt the following 2016 PROGRAM FOR PROMOTION AND SUPPORT OF TOURISM Article 1 This program is aimed at promotion and support for tourism in the Republic of Macedonia in 2016. The funds required for realization of the program amount to 205,950,000.00 denars, of which 158,490,000.00 on account no. 637, 45,000,000.00 denars on account no. 631, and 2,460,000,00 denars on account no. 787; the funds have been planned in the budget under item 10003 – Agency for Promotion and Support of Tourism, category 42 – goods and services, category 46 – subsidies and transfers, and category 48 – capital expenses. Article 2 The funds of Article 1 paragraph 2 of this program are intended for promotional activities and activities of support of tourism, as follows: а) A total of 48,250,000.00 denars are intended for promotional activities, marketing, and international cooperation, as follows: 1. Preparation, printing, and distribution of printed promotional material, 6 brochures with various thematic contents (Nature and Adventure, Tradition and Events, Rural Beauties, Hunting and Fishing, Archeological History and Culture, Wine and Food) on a high-quality material prepared in 11 foreign languages, as follows: English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, Japanese, Russian, Turkish, Bulgarian, Serbian, and Albanian, as well as preparation, printing, and distribution of guides, maps, and other small promotional material (pens, scarves, ties, key chains, various glass products, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report National Library of the Czech Republic Annual Report 2012
    Annual Report 2012 National Library of the Czech Republic 1 Contents A Word from the Director General ................................................................................................. 3 Events of the Year ............................................................................................................................. 4 The Revitalisation of the Klementinum, the Construction of a New and the Reconstruction of the Old Central Depository in Hostivař....................................................................................... 4 The Displacement Induced by the Second Stage of the Revitalisation of the Klementinum .............. 7 The Creation of the National Digital Library ....................................................................................... 8 The Expert Committee for the Evaluation of the Physical Condition of the Vyšehrad Codex and the Passional of Abbess Kunigunde ................................................ 10 Cooperation with Google .................................................................................................................. 11 EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS) ..................................................................................................... 12 Ask Your Library ................................................................................................................................. 15 The Reopening of the Historical Areas of the Klementinum for Public Access ................................ 16 From the Library’s Main Activities ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue 2017 Dialogue Between Civilizations
    Special Issue Issue 2017 2017 Dialogue between between civilizations Civilizations Special Issue 2017 Dialogue between Civilizations Civilization ( ) Special issue: Dialogue between Civilizations - linked with the International Symposium, “The 2nd Civilization Dialogue between Europe and Japan”, held in March 3-4, 2017 at Tokai University European Center in Vedbaek, Denmark; - edited by Institute of Civilization Research, Tokai University with the collaboration of Centre for Cultural Psychology, Aalborg University September 2017 Civilization () Special issue: Dialogue between Civilizations Table of Contents - Preface 1: On the Publication of a Special Issue of the International Symposium “Civilization Dialogue between Europe and Japan” 1-2 Kazushige Yamamoto - Preface 2: A Brief History of the Institute of Civilization Research and the 1st Civilization Dialogue between Europe and Japan 3-4 Nobukata Kutsuzawa - Editor’s note (Y. Hirano, S. Tanaka, L. Tateo, and J Valsiner) 5-7 - Eiditorial Board 7 - List of the Authors 8 I. Transaction across regions 1) Reception of Japanese lacquerware in Europe and its impact: The growth and end of Japanning Chiaki Genji 10-16 2) History of Brunei’s interactions with the outside world: Proposal for inbound tourism Nana Okayama 17-24 3) Viewing foreign countries, their peoples and cultures: What was the reason for Japonism in the West? Peter Pantzer 25-35 II. Beyond language boundaries 4) A study on language policies in the modernization of France: The policy of language unification and regional language and culture Mina Adachi 38-52 5) Civilization dialogue between Europe and Japan: Or the strange case of N. F. S. Grundtvig and Japan Hans Dorsch 53-62 6) The legitimacy of English domination and people’s attitudes toward English: An analysis based on a review of course feedback Yuki Takatori 63-77 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Virge Jõekalda
    LOIT JÕEKALDA Born: 16. 9. 1951, Estonia Address: Vabaduse väljak 6-15, 10146 Tallinn, Estonia Tel: +372 55 696086 E-mail: [email protected] Education: 1980–1986 Estonian Academy of Arts, graphic fine arts and photo Membership: 1992 Association of Estonian Printmakers, member of the board since 1999 1992 Estonian Artists Association, member of the board 1987 Estonian Society of Prehistoric Art, member of the board 1988 Estonian-Saami Society 1987 Finnish Society of Prehistoric Art, honorary member 2010 2010 member of the board of Tallinn Art Hall 2013 Estonian Chamber of Culture Awards: 2012 – Kristjan Raud annual art award (Estonia) 2008 – Grand Prix of International Print Biennial NOW ART, NOW FUTURE (Lithuania) 2004 – Gallery G and Tempera OY, annual art award (Estonia) 2002 – Kaliningrad-Königsberg Biennial, curator’s diploma (Russia) Exhibitions, curator projects, conferences, group exhibitions: 2016 – Estonian Graphic Arts in Krasnoyarsk Museum (Russia) 2016 – the 3rd Silk Road Art Festival, Xian – curator of artists from 27 countries (China) 2016 -- MINIPRINT TALLINN, Minsk, Mogilyev, Vitebsk (Belarus). 130 prints of 54 Artists from Estonia 2015 – BLACK and WHITE, Tallinn 5th Drawing Triennial, Tallinn Art Hall, the galleries of Tallinn and Viinistu Art Museum. 160 artists from 26 countries (Estonia) 2015 – the 2nd Silk Road Art Festival, Xian – curator of artists from 18 countries from Europe (China), http://www.worldartleague.org/en/exhibition/index.html 2015 -- MINIPRINT TALLINN, Moscow (Russia) 2014 – OrnaMENTAALNE, Tallinn Art Hall (Estonia) 2014 – Estonian Advocature 95, National Library (Estonia) 2014 -- MINIPRINT TALLINN, Pskov Art Museum (Russia) 2013 – Art exhibition -- National Library-95 (Estonia) 2013 – MURMURES. Group exhibition in Carcassonne (France) 2012 – International Drawing Triennial Tallinn 2012, exhibitions in Tallinn and Viinistu (Estonia) 2011 – Finno-Ugric heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Zbornik Za Umetnostno Zgodovino
    Zbornik za umetnostno zgodovino Archives d’histoire de l’art Art History Journal Izhaja od / Publié depuis / Published Since 1921 Nova vrsta / Nouvelle serie / New Series XLVIII Ljubljana 2012 336_zbornik.indd6_zbornik.indd 3 331.3.141.3.14 88:50:50 ZBORNIK ZA UMETNOSTNO ZGODOVINO N.S. XLVIII/2012 Izdalo in založilo / Published by SLOVENSKO UMETNOSTNOZGODOVINSKO DRUŠTVO, LJUBLJANA C/O FILOZOFSKA FAKULTETA UNIVERZE V LJUBLJANI ODDELEK ZA UMETNOSTNO ZGODOVINO, AŠKERČEVA 2 SI − 1101 LJUBLJANA, SLOVENIJA Uredniški odbor / Editorial Board MATEJ KLEMENČIČ, glavni in odgovorni urednik / Editor JANEZ BALAŽIC, MARJETA CIGLENEČKI, STANKO KOKOLE, MATEJA KOS, ANDREJ SMREKAR, SAMO ŠTEFANAC, ALENKA VODNIK Mednarodni svetovalni odbor / International Advisory Board FRANCESCO CAGLIOTI, VLADIMIR MARKOVIĆ, INGEBORG SCHEMPER SPARHOLZ, CARL BRANDON STREHLKE Lektoriranje / Language Editing JELKA JAMNIK, PHILIP BURT Prevajalci povzetkov in sinopsisov / Translators for summaries and abstracts MAJA LOVRENOV, ROSALBA MOLESI, GREGOR POBEŽIN, ALESSANDRO QUINZI, SAMO ŠTEFANAC Oblikovanje in postavitev/ Design and typesetting STUDIOBOTAS Tisk / Printing GORENJSKI TISK, D.D., KRANJ Naklada / Number of Copies Printed 500 IZVODOV Indeksirano v / Indexed by BHA, FRANCIS, SCOPUS ISSN 0351-224X ZBORNIK ZA UMETNOSTNO ZGODOVINO IZHAJA OB FINANČNI PODPORI MINISTRSTVA ZA KULTURO REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE IN JAVNE AGENCIJE ZA KNJIGO REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE 336_zbornik.indd6_zbornik.indd 4 331.3.141.3.14 88:50:50 Kazalo / Contents JANA INTIHAR FERJAN Jubilej Špelce Čopič 9 MATEJ KLEMENČIČ
    [Show full text]