DOCSLIB.ORG

Hearing Statement Windsor Link Railway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hearing Statement Windsor Link Railway Hearing Statement Windsor Link Railway On behalf of: Windsor Link Railway Ltd. August 2020 hghconsulting.com Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 Previous Representations ........................................................................................... 4 3.0 Response to Matters, Issues and Questions .............................................................. 5 4.0 Suggested Amendments .......................................................................................... 10 5.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 11 Windsor Link Railway Ltd. Local Plan Examination: Hearing Statement Page 2 of 12 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This Hearing Statement has been prepared by hgh Consulting on behalf of Windsor Link Railway Ltd. (WLR). 1.2 WLR are the promoters of the Windsor Link Railway scheme: a strategically important railway and property development scheme in Windsor that will create a through line by connecting the two existing branch lines from Staines and Slough via a tunnel and new single station; thus releasing land for enhanced property development opportunities along the riverside area. 1.3 The project has been progressing well with Network Rail (a principal landowner) having already granted WLR exclusivity in relation to the scheme for a period of 20 years; and has recommended progressing with the preparation of a detailed programme of works and feasibility study for the project. 1.4 Given the scheme’s strategic importance to Windsor, both in terms of transport infrastructure and the delivery of new housing and other development, it is considered that appropriate recognition of WLR be included within the emerging Local Plan. 1.5 This Hearing Statement sets out our previous objections to the Local Plan for context; and addresses a number of the Inspector’s further Matters, Issues and Questions for Stage 2 of the Examination. Windsor Link Railway Ltd. Local Plan Examination: Hearing Statement Page 3 of 12 2.0 Previous Representations Draft Local Plan (December 2016) 2.1 WLR objected to the Draft Local Plan on grounds that it did not include an appropriate reference to the WLR scheme. 2.2 It was recommended that paragraph 15.2.4 from the earlier Preferred Options Consultation (January 2014) document be reinstated: “The Borough Council will consider proposals for rail access to Heathrow on their merits. In addition, there are early local proposals for a Windsor Link Railway (WLR a line joining the two Windsor stations, connecting Slough to Waterloo via Windsor) and an alternative proposal for a Slough to Windsor tram link. Whilst Network Rail and South West Trains have concluded that the WLR is both likely to have both significant passenger demand and be viable, these proposals are at a very early feasibility stage.” 2.3 This wording had been consulted upon at the Preferred Options stage and did not encountered any significant objection. Thus, it is unclear why it was subsequently removed given the demonstrable progress that has been made by WLR and Network Rail as a principal landowner, which continue as at the date of this letter Submission Version (June 2017) 2.4 This reiterated previous objections highlighting that until appropriate reference to the Windsor Link Railway scheme was inserted, the Local Plan fails to meet the tests of “soundness” in the NPPF. Submission Version: Proposed Changes (October 2019) 2.5 This identified that the Local Plan was failing to meet objectively assessed housing needs as calculated under the Government’s standard methodology and that more effective use of brownfield sites needed to be made before considering Green Belt release in line with national planning policy. 2.6 In particular, the proposed allocation at Windsor and Eton Riverside Station Car Park (AL30) – which is to form an initial phase of the wider Windsor rail scheme – was supported by WLR, but it was recommended that the proposed number of dwellings that the site can support be increased from 30 to 60 dwellings in order to provide a more appropriate density for a sustainable urban site. 2.7 This representation was supported by separate representations by Network Rail confirming that WLR has an Exclusivity Agreement with Network Rail that allows WLR to promote a development at this station as part of, but not reliant or conditional upon, the wider Windsor Link Railway scheme. Windsor Link Railway Ltd. Local Plan Examination: Hearing Statement Page 4 of 12 3.0 Response to Matters, Issues and Questions Matter 1: Legal Compliance and Procedural Issues Issue 2: In procedural terms, do the proposed changes to the submitted plan (published for consultation on 1 November 2019) give rise to specific problems of legal non-compliance? 3.1 Network Rail are correctly listed as a “prescribed body” for the purposes of the Duty to Cooperate. RBWM’s Duty to Co-operate Compliance Statement (January 2018) outlines the discussions that have taken place with Network Rail over the Local Plan production process. However, all discussions appear to relate to Maidenhead Station only. RBWM have held no discussions with Network Rail, and WLR as its representative, regarding the Windsor Link Railway scheme despite recognition of the scheme in earlier versions of the plan. Issue 4: Has the Plan been informed by an adequate process of Sustainability Appraisal (SA)? Have the requirements of the SEA Directive and Regulations been met? 3.2 No. The Sustainability Appraisal does not consider at any time the Windsor Link Railway scheme as a “reasonable alternative” (particularly to Green Belt release), despite it being a favoured option throughout the early consultation phases. 3.3 As described above, reference to the Windsor Link Railway scheme was made within the Preferred Options Local Plan (January 2014). A subsequent consultation was also run between 29th June and 30th September 2015 asking for residents’ opinions on several specific planning policy questions, including proposals for the Windsor Link Railway scheme. Overall, 293 respondents (64%) supported the proposals, 54 (12%) were neutral and only 111 (24%) objected. This compares to approximately 90% of respondents who supported the protection of the Green Belt as evidenced in RBKT’s Consultation Statement to the Preferred Options Local Plan. The council’s statutory consultation is supported by third party surveys of opinion, including the Central Windsor Neighbourhood Plan (now Windsor 2030/Windsor Plan), a survey by the local newspaper which found 78% support and more recent research by Copper Consultancy which found 75% support (details of which can be found at https://windsorlink.co.uk/tag/consultations/). 3.4 Despite the overall levels of support for the Windsor Link Railway scheme, the Sustainability Appraisal does not include WLR as a “reasonable alternative” as required by the SEA Directive and Regulations. The current proposals for Green Belt release around Windsor cannot therefore be considered the most appropriate or sustainable option for the Local Plan. Matter 2: Spatial Portrait, Vision, Objectives and Spatial Strategy – Issue 3 Issue 3: Would the proposed changes to the Plan alter the focus of development proposed in Windsor from town centre sites to Green Belt sites? Is this justified? 3.5 The NPPF is clear that any amendments to Green Belt boundaries can only be undertaken in “exceptional circumstances”. There is little to no evidence or explanation of the exceptional circumstances for the proposed Green Belt amendments in the Submission Local Plan. 3.6 Rather, RBWM should be able to demonstrate that it has fully examined all other reasonable options for meeting its identified need for development, including making as much use as possible Windsor Link Railway Ltd. Local Plan Examination: Hearing Statement Page 5 of 12 of suitable brownfield sites and underutilised land and by optimising densities (particularly in town centres and areas well served by public transport) – as is good planning practice and principle. 3.7 The proposed changes to the Submission Local Plan no longer see Windsor Town Centre as a “growth area”, instead identifying this on the western edge of the town within what is currently Green Belt. This approach is notably at odds with national planning policy and is particularly important post COVID-19 to ensure that town centres are fit for purpose and, in the case of Windsor, remain attractive to tourism. The proposed approach towards Green Belt release will not result in a sustainable pattern of development when compared to the Windsor Link Railway scheme. 3.8 Whilst it is of course important to protect heritage assets in Windsor, the Submission Local Plan fails on two important fronts: 1) In its inability to make the most use of brownfield land within the Town Centre in what should be a key location for growth; and 2) Its inability to recognise that a careful masterplan-led approach to Windsor (as is proposed for Maidenhead and Ascot) would lead to significant improvements to the Town Centre, transport infrastructure, housing and employment provision, and enhancements to heritage assets. 3.9 As described above, respondents to earlier rounds of consultation notably preferred proposals for the Windsor Link Railway scheme over Green Belt release; but yet, RBWM has pursued Green Belt release at the expense of Windsor Town Centre. This approach is not justified. Issue
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time on 17 May 2018 Serious and Violent Crime Crime Victims Improv
    Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time on 17 May 2018 Serious and Violent Crime Question No: 2018/1151 Unmesh Desai How are you working with the Metropolitan Police Service and the Home Office to tackle the rise in violent crime? Oral response Crime victims Question No: 2018/1031 Shaun Bailey How many individual victims of crime have you met with since becoming Mayor? Oral response Improving the financial health of young Londoners Question No: 2018/0939 Caroline Russell In light of the London Assembly Economy Committee report, Short Changed: the financial health of Londoners, what will you do to improve the financial health and financial education of young Londoners? Oral response Sir Craig Mackey Question No: 2018/1246 Peter Whittle On the morning of Thursday 12 April 2018, Deputy Commissioner Sir Craig Mackey appeared on the Nick Ferrari show on LBC Radio and said of the death of burglar Henry Vincent: "This is a tragedy for the family who have lost a loved one. It is also a tragedy for the homeowner forced to take the action he did. I am pleased we got the quickest possible decision for him in relation to his actions." (http://news.met.police.uk/news/deputy-commissioner-sir-craig- mackey-comment-on-floral-tributes-left-in-hither-green-302519) What kind of message do you think Sir Craig's statement sends to the law-abiding folk of London? Oral response Cladding concerns post-Grenfell Question No: 2018/1149 Tom Copley Almost one year from the tragedy of Grenfell Tower that claimed the lives of 71 Londoners, many people across the country have discovered that they are living in unsafe homes.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENDING OUR LINES - Safeguarding Railways for Reopening
    DEFENDING OUR LINES - safeguarding railways for reopening A report by Smart Growth UK April 2020 http://www.smartgrowthuk.org 1 Contents __________________________________________________________________________________ Foreword by Paul Tetlaw 4 Executive summary 6 1. Introduction 8 2. Rail closures 9 3. Reopening and reinstatement 12 4. Obstacles to reinstatement of closed lines 16 5. Safeguarding alignments 19 6. Reopening and the planning system 21 7. Reopening of freight-only or mothballed lines 24 8. Reinstatement of demolished lines 29 9. New railways 38 10. Conclusions 39 Appendix 1 41 2 Smart Growth UK __________________________________________________________________________ Smart Growth UK is an informal coalition of organisations and individuals who want to promote the Smart Growth approach to planning, transportation and communities. Smart Growth is an international movement dedicated to more sustainable approaches to these issues. In the UK it is based around a set of principles agreed by the organisations that support the Smart Growth UK coalition in 2013:- Urban areas work best when they are compact, with densities appropriate to local circumstances but generally significantly higher than low-density suburbia and avoiding high-rise. In addition to higher density, layouts are needed that prioritize walking, cycling and public transport so that they become the norm. We need to reduce our dependence on private motor vehicles by improving public transport, rail-based where possible, and concentrating development in urban areas. We should protect the countryside, farmland, natural beauty, open space, soil and biodiversity, avoiding urban sprawl and out-of-town development. We should protect and promote local distinctiveness and character and our heritage, respecting and making best use of historic buildings, street forms and settlement patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Windsor Link Railway Strategic Case
    The Windsor Link Railway Strategic Case August 2017 www.windsorlink.co.uk The case for change Fragmented rail network Severely congested roads Poor air quality Housing shortage Railways uuOrbital (or north-south) journeys are often impractical, forcing detours via London or Reading uuFragmented rail network with low ‘mesh connectivity’ (the Great Western being effectively a long single point of failure) with 30% of passengers experiencing delays uuSevere capacity constraints on main lines but with many branch lines having low utilisation uuHeathrow operates as a virtual island, linked to the east but cut off from the north, south, and west uuEight local authorities, five Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) and four rail regions make planning more difficult withno unified plan uuOther proposed connections to Heathrow add to fragmentation, duplication and track capacity problems Roads uuThis region has some of the most congested motorways in the UK. The M4 is nearing capacity, currently taking 130,000 journeys per day with 160,000 forecast by 2030 uuConvergence of M40, M4, M3 and M25 and Heathrow makes this a critically important area for the country but exacerbates congestion uuHeathrow expansion will add to the pressure. Unpopular congestion taxes are being mooted uuLocal roads are also severely congested; the Slough to Staines corridor is the most congested in the area, taking 3,500 cars per day with no alternative practical rail route uuRoyal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead (RBWM) welcomes 6.9 million visitors per year to many internationally significant venues; 82% of traffic is by road uuParks and Green Belt make provision of new roads very difficult politically Air quality uuAir quality identified as the key challenge for expanding Heathrow uuSurface transport is the main contributor to existing pollution, only 16% on nearby road junctions coming direct from Heathrow uuUK issued ‘final warning’ by EU for NO2 uu28,000 premature deaths from pollution p.a.
    [Show full text]
  • New Civil Engineer SEPTEMBER 2019
    Engineers save Whaley Bridge p11 Polcevera one year on p14 Future of roads p27 New Civil Engineer SEPTEMBER 2019 BRIDGING THE BALKANS COMPLEX GEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY OVERCOME IN BUILDING KOSOVO’S VITAL NEW TRADE LINK Designed to be friendlier to the environment. Sourced from our own local quarries and fi red to perfection, Hepworth Clay drainage pipe is the 100% natural choice for all today’s drainage projects. Our manufacturing processes use natural rainwater and we recycle all our heat across the site. 100% sustainable and recyclable, it has true birth to rebirth pedigree and a natural integrity that allows you to specify a genuine ‘fi t and forget’ drainage solution with total confi dence. For the full story on Hepworth Clay’s environmental credentials visit: www.hepworthclay.co.uk 6206_01_Hepworth Clay 265x210 Press_.indd Pg1 05/08/2019 11:49 New Civil Engineer IS BORIS GOING TO BE OUR INFRASTRUCTURE CHAMPION? MARK HANSFORD EDITOR o we were one year out. Boris Johnson is now the prime Alongside these reviews, fervent work to re-engage with the industry in minister, just as this column predicted back in May the quest to reduce costs is underway – to the extent that it seems certain 2015. Back then, a General Election had just returned that a very public announcement to proceed will come in the Autumn. S David Cameron to power on the back of a Brexit referen- And will Johnson stop at HS2? Unlikely. He has already visited the North dum promise that was always going to tear the country to talk up the proposed Leeds to Manchester rail link, regularly dubbed – and the Conservative Party – apart.
    [Show full text]
  • The Windsor Link Railway (WLR)
    The Windsor Link Railway (WLR) This is an integrated transport plan for the region around Heathrow, Windsor and the Thames Valley. WLR would be the first privately-led new railway for over 100 years. It is a for-profit company but it is not just about profit : its social aims include preserving our heritage, improving our environment, improving standards of living for local residents, increasing social mobil- ity and providing economic growth and employment. Promoters of the WLR George Bathurst, a Windsor Councillor, by trade an electronic engineer rather than a railway engi- neer, former marketing director for Hewlett-Packhard’s software. He has formed the company Windsor Link Railway Ltd. Richard Wickerson, with 25 years’ experience in corporate and project finance, former partner in upgrading London Underground and with W S Atkins, civil engineers Paul Bayly, merchant banker with Citibank and Midland Montague in Britain, Africa and Aus- tralia, Fellow of the Institute of Directors, former colonel in the New Zealand Army. MacAlpines have prepared detailed plans and could complete the work in the 2 years 2018-2020. Phase 1 plan It is remarkable that Windsor’s two railway stations are only 300 yards apart. They were built by two different railway companies, the Southern Railway (SR) and the Great Western Railway (GWR) at the height of their competition. The same was once true of Reading’s two railway stations of the SR and GWR. They were then joined into a single station. Unlike other towns such as Reading the lack of connectivity in Windsor between the two was never corrected and we are left with a historical anom- aly.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Valley Branch Lines – Notes of Meeting
    Thames Valley Branch Lines – Notes of Meeting Date: 05 December 2016 Time: 10.00am Venue: 4 Marlow Road, Maidenhead Attendees: Cllr Phillip Bicknell, Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Cllr Julian Brookes, Henley‐on‐Thames Council Martin Coker, Cookham Parish Council) Gerard Coll, Wycombe District Council Kevin Miller, Network Rail Philip Meadowcroft, Wargrave Users Group Gordon Oliver, Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Nigel Philips, Rail Futures / High Wycombe Society Tom Pierpoint, Great Western Railway Michael Porter, Henley Branch User Group Richard Porter, Maidenhead Marlow Passenger Association Cllr MJ Saunders, Cookham Parish Council / Richard Scarff, Cookham Society / Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Cllr David Sleight, Wokingham Borough Council Cllr Jocelyn Towns, Marlow Town Council David Wilby, Wokingham Borough Council ITEM NOTES ACTION 1.0 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Cllr Bicknell welcomed everyone to the meeting and invited attendees to introduce themselves. 2.0 NETWORK RAIL PRESENTATION Kevin Miller (KM) gave the presentation in place of Simon Maple who had been called away to an urgent meeting. He summed up progress on electrification to date: The 16 mile section between Didcot and Reading is complete and is being used for fleet testing. A link to Reading Depot has also been completed, so electric trains no longer need to be dragged in and out and can be moved within the depot, which is being used for training purposes. Changes at Old Oak Common will affect maintenance operations and some facilities are moving to Reading (e.g. wheel lathe). Some elements of the electrification programme have been deferred, in order to fund previously unfunded scope (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Strategy
    House of Commons Transport Committee Aviation Strategy First Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I HC 78-I House of Commons Transport Committee Aviation Strategy First Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes. Oral and written evidence contained in Volume II and additional written evidence contained in Volume III are available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/transcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 8 May 2013 HC 78-I Incorporating HC 765 i-vii, Session 2012-13 Published on 10 May 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Sarah Champion (Labour, Rotherham) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Karen Lumley (Conservative, Redditch) Karl McCartney (Conservative, Lincoln) Lucy Powell (Labour/Co-operative, Manchester Central) Mr Adrian Sanders (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton), Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South), Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South), Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West), Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North), Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard, (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys), Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South), Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge), Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation on Revised Draft Airports National Policy Statement
    Consultation on revised draft Airports National Policy Statement Summary report of consultation responses June 2018 A report to the Department for Transport Prepared by OPM Group OPM Group Consultation on revised draft Airports National Policy Statement – Summary report of consultation responses Client Department for Transport Company OPM Group Title Consultation on revised draft Airports National Policy Statement Subtitle Summary report of consultation responses Status Final Classification Public Project Code DfT2 Quality Assurance by Helen Ashley Main point of contact Ilina Georgieva Email [email protected] If you would like a large text version of this document, please contact us. OPM Group 252B Gray’s Inn Road +44 (0)20 7239 7800 London www.opm.co.uk www.dialoguebydesign.co.uk WC1X 8XG [email protected] [email protected] © OPM Group The contents of this document should not be copied, reproduced or disclosed to any third party without prior written permission from a Director at OPM Group. Public Final Page 2 of 150 OPM Group Consultation on revised draft Airports National Policy Statement – Summary report of consultation responses Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................... 5 List of acronyms ........................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 1: About the consultation ..................................................................... 13 Background ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rail User Express. We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News
    September 2018 Welcome to the Rail User Express. Feel free to forward it to a colleague, or to reproduce items in your own newsletter (quoting sources). For further detail of any of the stories mentioned, consult the relevant website, or come back to me for the source material. Please say if you no longer wish to receive Rail User Express, or if you know of anyone or any Rail User Group (RUG) who would like to be added to the circulation list. Inevitably but regrettably, this month’s issue is largely taken up by the impact of the May timetable change, exacerbated by ongoing industrial action. Passengers’ habits are changing: many now use the car for some or all of their journey, which is bad news for the environment, but potentially fatal for further expansion of the railway. Winning them back will be a challenge for all of us. Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line The Far North Review Team, which was set up in 2016 to review every aspect of the Far North Line, met on 7 September to discuss progress so far, and future plans in respect of line capacity, higher speed limits, signalling, better trains and timetable structure. NR, ScotRail and Transport Scotland are working on a raft of improvements, some incremental and some radical. The fruits of the discussions cannot yet be shared, as announcements will be made in due course, but Mike Lunan and Ian Budd from FoFNL came away smiling broadly! Rail Action Group, East of Scotland Replacement of 6-car sets on the North Berwick line by 4-car sets due to the late rollout of the Hitachi Class 385 trains and a shortage of rolling stock led to serious overcrowding.
    [Show full text]
  • BRANCH Annual General Meeting 2017 Saturday 29Th April 2017 University of Westminster’S Cavendish Campus 115 New Cavendish St, London, W1W 6UW
    LONDON & SOUTH EAST BRANCH Annual General Meeting 2017 Saturday 29th April 2017 University of Westminster’s Cavendish Campus 115 New Cavendish St, London, W1W 6UW From Goodge Street station - turn left on exiting and walk for a few minutes, then turn left into Holland Street and keep going - it turns into New Cavendish Street. From Warren Street station - walk a few minutes southwards on Tottenham Court Road, then turn right into Holland Street. From Great Portland Street station. - from the traffic island on which the station sits, negotiate the crossings on the side with one-way traffic. The most direct route is NOT to take Great Portland Street, nor Bolsover Street, but take Cleveland Street (which is opposite the eastern end of the Agenda station island) which intersects New Cavendish Street at your destination. & From Oxford Circus station walk one block Reports east then go north along Great Portland enclosed Street then turn right into New Cavendish Street. AGENDA 10:30 DOORS OPEN (Coffee available) 11:00 Chairman’s introduction followed by Heathrow Expansion – implications for surface access by rail Steve Costello of Heathrow Southern Railway George Bathurst of Windsor Link Railway Network Rail presentation on Western Rail Access to Heathrow 12:30 Lunch (Please make own arrangements and return before 13:50) 14:00 Branch AGM 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Minutes of previous AGM, held 23rd April 2016 3. Matters Arising 4. Election Results 5. Chairman’s Report for 2016 6. Treasurer’s Report for 2016 7. Membership Report for 2016 8. Division’s Reports 2016 a) Eastern b) Kent c) Sussex & Coastway d) Herts & Beds e) Surrey f) Metro 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation  Foreword
    Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Foreword I am delighted to present the Great Western growth specifically predicted at Paddington Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) Draft for and in the Bristol area. Consultation. This sets out a detailed strategy The key themes that have emerged through for a specific part of the rail network over the the RUS are the need for additional capacity next decade, with an indicative strategy to 2030. to handle increasing demand from both As well as the Great Western Main Line itself, passengers and freight users; the need to the document covers the network north to address performance issues on key parts of the Norton Junction and Bicester Town and south route and local connectivity for improvements in to Basingstoke, Salisbury and Dorchester. The journeys into or between key cities and regional Great Western RUS borders the areas of the centres, including to and from those outside the network covered by the South West Main Line RUS area such as Birmingham and Portsmouth. and Wales RUSs, both of which have already A number of options were identified for been published, and has a significant interface development and appraisal to address with the West Midlands and Chilterns RUS, these gaps. Options to increase the length which is currently being developed. of trains, improve service patterns or to The process that has been followed is provide additional infrastructure are proposed well-established. Essentially, this involves solutions. The recommendations from this developing a detailed understanding of the process form the basis of the strategy. current situation, incorporating the implications Three gaps will be addressed further during of committed schemes and forecasts of the consultation period, including connectivity future demand for both passenger and freight and capacity between the West Midlands and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Meetings 120516 Windsor Link 2
    The WINDSOR LINK RAILWAY An innovative solution to local and regional transport problems National Advantages How Be Green Reduce traffic congestion around Heathrow by providing a practical alternative to the car (e.g. reduce traffic jams on the M4). Save HM Treasury over Save £500 million in cash and a further £500m in guarantees, compared £1 billion to other plans (by private finance and integrating projects better) Integrate with other Make the proposed high speed link to the north (HS2) more useful to a transport policy (e.g. HS2 greater number of voters, especially in the home counties, and greatly instead of runway 3) reduce the journey time to the north, compared with other plans. Cut government waste Be seen to be working with private companies in innovative ways to save money. Have a new rail link to By working with private companies who have no interest in producing Heathrow from the west endless reports, parts of the new rail infrastructure could be in use by the time of the next election. Improve the international Restoring Windsor, Britain’s most visited attraction outside London, and reputation of Britain making Heathrow more accessible would be high profile outcomes, emphasising the new government’s commitment to the environment. A MAP SHOWING WINDSOR AND HOW IT COULD SERVE A BETTER CONNECTED REGION AND HEATHROW: Existing railway Slough ideas for GtWRATH* – cost c. £500 million 1 BAA Airtrack proposal – cost c. £500 million 2 Combined cost of existing proposals = £1 billion WLR proposal – Total cost < £500 million Possible HS2 spur direct to 3 4 north 1 New platforms at Slough station 7 and restored Royal Curve 6 2 M4 interchange at Chalvey 3 New station and tunnel at Windsor 5 4 Level crossing replaced by bridges 5 Flat junctions 6 Bridge over M25 7 Possible new HS2 terminal by T5 8 New Staines Town station 9 Restored chord at Staines TWO FOR THE PRICE OF ONE AND A BETTER 1 mile 9 OVERALL SOLUTION.
    [Show full text]