Districts Business Plan Recommendations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Districts Business Plan Recommendations ! ! Executive Summary The 2030 Challenge is an initiative launched in 2006 by the Architecture 2030 organization to drastically reduce energy and water use in the built environment and vehicle emissions in cities across the United States. 2030 Districts® are part of this initiative, developed by Architecture 2030 to address energy, water, and vehicle emissions by the year 2030. Five cities have established 2030 Districts: Seattle, WA; Cleveland, OH, Pittsburgh, PA; Los Angeles, CA and the latest addition is Denver, CO. Additional information on the goals for the 2030 District® and background information is included in this report in the “Existing 2030 Districts®” section. Currently, the cities of Ann Arbor and Detroit are in the process of launching two additional districts to operate in the state of Michigan. The launch is initially planned to occur in the second quarter of 2014. The specific scope for the 2030 District®: Detroit + Ann Arbor MAP project established and agreed upon by the Weekend MBA MAP Team and Clean Energy Coalition, sponsors of the MAP project, is to propose a launch plan with three critical elements: 1. Organizational structure, including governance model; 2. Outreach guidance to engage building owners, professional stakeholders, and respective communities; 3. Exploration of funding options in order to recommend a sustainable funding plan. The research and recommendations presented in this report are the results of primary interviews conducted with various stakeholders including property owners, public officials, financial service providers, higher education, nonprofits and community organizations. Secondary sources examined include journal articles and periodicals. The 2030 District®: Detroit + Ann Arbor project also incorporated themes and business strategies gained through lectures and course load of the Weekend MBA program. The research conducted on the existing districts was imperative to understanding their successes and potential pitfalls. The best practices and lessons learned from this research are outlined in the “Existing 2030 Districts®” section of this report. The MAP team then conducted interviews and attended 2030 District® Exploratory meetings in order to assess the local market and define the local value proposition. The local value proposition has been summarized into four categories: aggregated reporting & analytics, awareness & educational tools, avenue for sharing best practices, and collective voice & purchasing power. The MAP team’s recommendation is to host the District organization as a project under an existing nonprofit. The advantages to this arrangement clearly outweigh the disadvantages. The two factors that carry by far the most weight in this analysis are: • The ability to leverage host resources for both administration and implementation of District tasks • Negative attitudes in both Detroit and Ann Arbor toward creation of a new nonprofit, reflected by advice received on several occasions from stakeholders in both cities Regarding the decision on whether or not to combine the advisory committees for the Ann Arbor and Detroit initiatives, the MAP team recommends starting with a combined committee initially, to minimize overhead and maintain close collaboration. As the Districts evolve and grow, the ! team expects District financial resources and complexity of required tasks to increase. Local variation between the cities will become more important. As these issues become more prevalent, a transition to separate committees is recommended. Each Committee may elect its own Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary and Treasurer positions. 2030 District Staff and the Advisory Committees may establish Task Forces as needed to execute projects related to Grants, Finance, Marketing/Outreach, Research/Sustainability Concepts, Policy and Metrics. The recommended Task Forces are intended to cover the full set of tasks facing the District. Of course, other task forces may be proposed and evaluated at this stage. They may be created incrementally, some may not be needed at all, and others could be combined or decomposed further to meet the needs of the Sister Districts. The recommended organizational structure is a phased approach featuring an initial, interim, and steady state. Theses phases are outlined in the “Organizational Structure” section. How and when the 2030 District should transfer from one state to the next cannot specifically be determined at this time. Business strategy, however, can help guide the 2030 District from one stage to the next and help determine and evaluate milestones. Suggested guidelines around these milestones are also highlighted in this report under the “milestone definition for changing phases” section. As part of the market outreach guidance, the MAP team provided an STP (segmentation, targeting and positioning) analysis. The potential stakeholders were segmented by geographic, partner type and classification attributes. This exercise is important because certain aspects of the local value proposition appeal to each segment and by understanding this, the District can more effectively focus its outreach efforts. The MAP team also recommends developing an strong on- boarding process in order to keep new members engaged and to hold onto early momentum. This report will also focus on the following options for creating a funding model for the 2030 Districts® of Detroit and Ann Arbor: 1. Grants, Sponsorship and Foundational support 2. Fee for service model 3. Membership dues It is recommended that the “Sister Districts” should leverage shared resources, but approach certain fundraising and other actions individually. Through researching, analyzing, and compiling this report, it became very clear that there is a clear need to be addressed in both Detroit and Ann Arbor in regards to organizing and informing business owners, professional stakeholders, and the community around issues of energy efficiency. This report is designed to provide insight and recommendations to address these needs. The next 3-6 months are imperative to the success of this endeavor. The interest and need are present and now is the time to act. Page!2!of!65! ! ! 2030 Districts®: Detroit and Ann Arbor - Final Report 2014 - Weekend MBA MAP Team Abhishek Sinha, Alex Thorpe, Hend Khatib, and Matt Ogdahl Page!3!of!65! ! ! Table of Contents MAP Project Overview&.........................................................................................................................&5! 2030 Background&...............................................................................................................................................&5! Objectives&............................................................................................................................................................&6! Methodology&.......................................................................................................................................................&7! Existing 2030 Districts®&.......................................................................................................................&7! List of Existing and Emerging 2030 Districts®&..........................................................................................&7! Key Findings from current 2030 Districts® operations and best practices&.........................................&7! Existing 2030 District® Business Demographics&.....................................................................................&10! Summary of Best Practices and Lessons Learned&..................................................................................&10! Best Practices!...................................................................................................................................................................!10! Lessons Learned!.............................................................................................................................................................!11! Local Market Evaluation – Detroit and Ann Arbor&....................................................................&11! Expectations of Property Owners&...............................................................................................................&13! Expectations of Professional and Community Stakeholders&................................................................&14! Value from Professional and Community Stakeholders&........................................................................&14! Local Value Proposition&................................................................................................................................&16! Aggregated Reporting & Analytics:!.........................................................................................................................!17! Awareness and Educational Tools:!..........................................................................................................................!17! Avenue for sharing best practices:!............................................................................................................................!18! Collective Voice and Purchasing Power:!...............................................................................................................!18! Launch Plan&..........................................................................................................................................&18! Organizational Structure&..............................................................................................................................&18!
Recommended publications
  • Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC (KCC), the Claims and Noticing Agent for the Debtor in the Above-Captioned Case
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: Chapter 9 City of Detroit, Michigan, Case No. 13-53846 Debtor. Hon. Thomas J. Tucker _____________________________________/ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Lydia Do, certify and say that I am employed by Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC (KCC), the claims and noticing agent for the Debtor in the above-captioned case. On December 27, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of KCC caused to be served the following documents via First Class mail on the service lists attached hereto as Exhibit A: Order Granting the City of Detroit's Motion to Implement Distributions of B Notes to Holders of Allowed Class 14 Claims Under the City's Confirmed Plan of Adjustment [Docket No. 13173] Notice Regarding Distributions to Class 14 Claimants (includes the Brokerage Account Form, the Tax Form, the Set Up Your Brokerage Account Form) [attached as Exhibit 6-1 to Docket No. 13126] Return Envelope Dated: January 6, 2020 /s/ Lydia Do Lydia Do KCC 2335 Alaska Ave El Segundo, CA 90245 13-53846-tjt Doc 13215 Filed 01/06/20 Entered 01/06/20 18:55:44 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A 13-53846-tjt Doc 13215 Filed 01/06/20 Entered 01/06/20 18:55:44 Page 2 of 6 Exhibit A Served via First Class Mail CreditorName CreditorNoticeName Address1 Address2 Address3 City State Zip Country Abraham Greer and Sandra Greer c/o Atty the Rubinstein Law Firm Jan Jeffrey Rubinstein (P57937) 30150 Telegraph Rd., Ste 444 Bingham Farms MI 48025 Advance Digital Systems, LLC PO Box 721217 Berkley MI 48072 AFSCME Bankruptcy Fund Richard G.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit FRC City Resolution 2017-26
    STATE OF MICHIGAN RICK SNYDER DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY NICK A. KHOURI GOVERNOR LANSING STATE TREASURER DETROIT FINANCIAL REVIEW COMMISSION CITY RESOLUTION 2017-26 APPROVING THE CITY’S OCTOBER 2017 CONTRACT REQUESTS WHEREAS, Public Act 181 of 2014, the Michigan Financial Review Commission Act (the “Act”), allows for the creation of the Detroit Financial Review Commission (the “Commission”) within the Michigan Department of Treasury; and WHEREAS, Section 6(1) of the Act empowers the Commission to provide oversight for the City of Detroit (the “City”) beginning on the Effective Date of the Plan of Adjustment; and WHEREAS, Section 6(6) of the Act provides that during the period of oversight, the Commission review and approve the City’s applicable contracts, as defined by Section 3(a) of the Act, and that an applicable contract does not take effect unless approved by the Commission; and WHEREAS, at the Commission meeting on October 30, 2017, the City presented applicable contracts, attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution, for the Commission’s review and approval. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Detroit Financial Review Commission as follows: 1. That the City’s October 2017, contract requests, attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution but excluding any contracts a majority of Commission members present has agreed to exclude as noted in the minutes, are hereby approved. 2. That the minutes of the Detroit Financial Review Commission meeting at which this Resolution is adopted take notice of the adoption of this Resolution. 3. This Resolution
    [Show full text]
  • Notre Dame Directory, 1955
    STUDENT DIRECTORY of the UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME 1955 - 1956 Price, $1.00 STUDENT DIRECTORY of the UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME 1955 - 1956 CONTENTS Officers of Administration ................. -------- 3 yj Abbreviations ................................................................. ............ Rectors and Prefects ................... -........................... -..... -......... 5 Faculty Directory ............................... -...... -........................ 6 Student Directory - -...... 1^ 9 The information contained in this Directory is taken from University records as of October 10, 1955. Changes and alterations reported to the Office of Student Accounts after the above date are not included herein. THE OFFICERS OF ADMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - 1955-1956 PHONE President Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh, C.S.C. 235" Executive Vice-President Rev. Edmund P. Joyce, C.S.C. 238 Vice-President-Academic Affairs Rev. Phillip S. Moore, C.S.C. 520 Asst, to Vice-President Rev. Robert J. Lochner, C.S.C. 262 Vice-President-Business Affairs Rev. Jerome J. Wilson, C.S.C. 325 Vice-President-Student Affairs Rev. James E. Norton, C.S.C. 3% Asst, to Vice-President & Prefect of Religion Rev. Charles I. McCarragher, C.S.C. 666 Director of Admissions Rev. Louis J. Thornton, C.S.C. 413 Director of Students1 Accounts Mr. Emerit E . Moore 320 Director of Personnel Mr. Joseph F . O'Brien 676 Prefect of Religion Rev. Charles M. Carey, C.S.C. 348 Asst. Prefect of Religion Rev. Joseph D. Barry, C.S.C. 326 Asst. Prefect of Religion Rev. Clement E. Kane, C.S.C. 427 Asst. Prefect of Religion Rev. Wilfrid A. Menard, C.S.C. 250 Asst. Prefect of Religion Rev. Daniel J. O'Neil, C.S.C. 350 Student Counsellor Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Boscarinot.DETROIT
    Final Report Proposed Broadway Avenue Local Historic District By a resolution dated January 26, 2005, the Detroit City Council charged the Historic Designation Advisory Board, a study committee, with the official study of the proposed Broadway Avenue Local Historic District in accordance with Chapter 25 of the 1984 Detroit City Code and the Michigan Local Historic Districts Act. The proposed Broadway Avenue Local Historic District is composed of fifteen buildings (fourteen contributing, one non-contributing) located on parts of two noncontiguous blocks in downtown Detroit between Grand Circus Park (Witherell) and Gratiot Avenue. These commercial buildings range in date of construction from c. 1896-97 to 1926 and in height from two to fourteen stories. The northernmost noncontiguous portion in the 1500 block of Broadway is located in the National- Register-listed Grand Circus Park Historic District; and the southern noncontiguous portion in the 1300 block, is identical to the Broadway Avenue Historic District (NR 2004). Boundaries: The boundaries of the proposed Broadway Avenue Local Historic District are outlined in heavy black on the attached map, and are as follows: Southern noncontiguous portion: Beginning at a point, that point being the intersection of the centerline of East Grand River Avenue with the centerline of the alley parallel to and between Broadway Avenue and Center Street; thence southeast along the centerline of said alley to its intersection with the northwest line of Lot 5, Plat of Section 9, Governor & Judges Plan,
    [Show full text]
  • Notre Dame Directory, 1954
    STUDENT DIRECTORY of the UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME 1954 - 1955 Price, $1.00 STUDENT DIRECTORY of the UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME 1954 - 1955 CONTENTS Officers of Administration ..................................................... 3 Abbreviations ..................... ---- ------- ------ 4 Rectors and Prefects ...................... —.................... 5 Faculty Directory........................................................................ 6 Student Directory ........................................................ -.... -........12 The information contained in this Directory is taken from University records as of October 12, 1954. Changes and alterations not reported to the Office of Student Accounts after the above date are not included herein. THE OFFICERS OF ADMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - 1954-1955 PHONE President Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh, C.S.C. 235 Executive Vice-President Rev. Edmund P. Joyce, C.S.C. 238 Vice-President-Academic Affairs Rev. Phillip S. Moore, C.S.C. 520 Asst, to Vice-President Rev. Robert J. Lochner, C.S.C. 262 Vice-President-Business Affairs Rev. Jerome J. Wilson, C.S.C. 325 Vice-President-Student Affairs Rev. James E. Norton, C.S.C. 384 Asst, to Vice-President Rev. Charles I. McCarragher-, C.S.C. 666 & Prefect of Discipline Director of Admissions Rev. Louis J. Thornton, C.S.C. 413 Director of Students Accounts Mr. Emerit E. Moore 320 Prefect of Religion _ Rev. Charles M. Carey, C.S.C. 348 Asst. Prefect of Religion Rev. Joseph D. Barry, C.S.C. 427 Asst. Prefect of Religion Rev. Victor F. Dean, C.S.C. 250 Asst. Prefect of Religion Rev. Daniel J. O'Neill, C.S.C. 350 Student Counsellor Rev. Thomas P. Irving, C.S.C. 277 Student Advisor Mr. William M. Burke 577 Purchasing Agent Mr. Jerome J.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Four
    SECTION FOUR SECTION FOUR ECONOMY AND INVESTMENT ECONOMY & INVESTMENT EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYMENT SECTORS & GROWTH 76 WAGES 77 COMMERCIAL SPACE 78 REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 82 Section Four | Economy and Investment 75 EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYMENT SECTORS & GROWTH (4.1) Since 2010, Downtown Detroit has added over 16,000 employees including over 12,000 Quicken Loans affiliated team members, 3,400 Blue Cross Blue Shield employees, and 600 Campbell Ewald employees. (4.2) Total Employment in Greater Downtown, 2011 >1% 2% AREA EMPLOYEE COUNT 50% CORKTOWN 2,329 EMPLOYEES DOWNTOWN 66,489 EMPLOYEES EASTERN MARKET 3,407 EMPLOYEES LAFAYETTE PARK 413 EMPLOYEES 44% MIDTOWN 59,557 EMPLOYEES RIVERTOWN 1, 664 EMPLOYEES >1% 3% WOODBRIDGE 542 EMPLOYEES (4.3) Employment by Sector, 2011 SECTOR EMPLOYEE COUNT 37% 11% PRIVATE EDUCATION & HEALTHCARE 50,875 EMPLOYEES 5% GOVERNMENT 21,596 EMPLOYEES 11% PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, TECH & MGMT 27,862 EMPLOYEES 16% LEISURE & HOSPITALITY 15,093 EMPLOYEES 20% CONSTRUCTION, MANUFACTURE & TRANSPORT 6,493 EMPLOYEES OTHER SECTORS 14,482 EMPLOYEES 76 7.2 SQ MI | A Report on Greater Downtown Detroit | Second Edition WAGES (4.4 ) Annual Wages at Greater Downtown Jobs, 2002-2011 2002 2011 WAGE 2011 COUNT $0–$15K 11% 16% – 05% 0–$15K 15,610 $15K–40K 39,501 $40K+ 81,290 $15K–$40K – 09% GAIN 38% 29% LOSS 20% $40K+ 46% + 14% 60% Section Four | Economy and Investment COMMERCIAL SPACE (4.5) Commercial Real Estate in Greater Downtown, All Properties, 2014 NET RENTABLE LEASE RATE VACANCY RATE $20.44 Net Rentable: 26.1M SQ.FT. DOWNTOWN 26,137,026 16% Lease Rate: $20.44 Vacancy Rate: 16% 7,931,165 $16.01 11% Net Rentable: 7.9M SQ.FT.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. X New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing The Civil Rights Movement and the African American Experience in 20th Century Detroit B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Periods of Significance 1900-1941: Rekindling Civil Rights in Detroit 1941-1954: Birth of the Civil Rights Movement in Detroit 1954-1964: Modern Civil Rights Movement in Detroit 1964-1976: The Second Revolution in Detroit Thematic Framework: Equal Education Public Accommodation Voting, Housing, Equal Employment, Criminal Injustice Context Themes: The Role of Detroit’s Black Churches in the Civil Rights Movement 1900-1976 The Demand for Fair Housing in Detroit 1918-1976 Equity in Health Care 1900-1976 African Americans and Detroit’s Automobile Industry 1914-1976 Detroit and Equal Education 1900-1976 Detroit’s Black-Owned Businesses 1900-1976 Detroit’s African American Social Clubs and Civil Rights Organizations 1900-1976 Politics, Law, and Representation in Detroit 1919-1976 Finding a Voice: Detroit’s African American Population and the Media1900-1976 Music & Civil Rights in Detroit 1900-1976 C. Form Prepared by: name/title: Ruth E. Mills, Senior Historian Saundra Little, Historic Architect organization: Quinn Evans Architects street & number: 4219 Woodward Avenue, Suite 301 city or town: Detroit state: Michigan zip code:48201 e-mail: [email protected] telephone: (313) 462-2550 date: December 18, 2020 NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweet Lorraine in The
    By Tom Kaiser It was a gloomy day in Cadillac Square Park as I held a five-foot-tall camera flash to keep it from blowing over in the wind. From the west side of the park, I had the perfect vantage point for the good things happening in downtown Detroit—a city many Americans have left for dead. Within my view were the stunning Book Tower, Cadillac Tower and David Stott Building, neo-classical, neo-gothic and art deco icons from the 1920s towering over an urban plaza. Between the classics were sleek offices for Ernst & Young, busy sidewalks and a brand new commercial tower rising in the heart of the city. Our photo subject, Lorraine Platman of Sweet Lorraine’s Fabulous Mac n’ Cheez, just finished her hair and makeup when an affectionate homeless guy moved in trying to give her a hug. “Watch the hair!” she said with a smile. Seeing the unfolding nonsense, I guided him out of the shot and urged our photographer to move quickly as a pair of security guards closed in to boot us from the park—no commercial photos allowed. This new construction is a big deal in Detroit, with a downtown that saw its office vacancy rate exceed 25 percent during a recession that hit harder here than anyplace else. Things are different now. Amazon, Quicken, Lear Corp. and the “big three” automakers are making huge investments, three new stadiums are under construction, a new train line nears completion, residential developers are running out of warehouses to convert, boutique fashion retailers are popping up and bullish entrepreneurs are hurriedly placing their bets.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Greater Downtown Detroit 2Nd Edition
    7.2 A Report on Greater Downtown Detroit SQ MI 2nd Edition CONTRIBUTORS & CONTENTS Advisory Team Keegan Mahoney, Hudson-Webber Foundation Elise Fields, Midtown Detroit Inc. James Fidler, Downtown Detroit Partnership Spencer Olinek, Detroit Economic Growth Corporation Jeanette Pierce, Detroit Experience Factory Amber Gladney, Invest Detroit Contributors Regina Bell, Digerati Jela Ellefson, Eastern Market Corporation Phil Rivera, Detroit Riverfront Conservancy Data Consultant Jeff Bross, Data Driven Detroit Design Megan Deal, Tomorrow Today Photography Andy Kopietz, Good Done Daily Production Management James Fidler & Joseph Gruber, City Form Detroit 2 7.2 SQ MI | A Report on Greater Downtown Detroit | Second Edition 04 Introduction 06 Section One | Overview 08–09 Greater Downtown in Context 10–11 Greater Downtown by Neighborhood 12–25 Downtown, Midtown, Woodbridge, Eastern Market, Lafayette Park, Rivertown, Corktown 26 Section Two | People Demographics 28 Population & Household Size 29–30 Density 31 Age 32–33 Income 34 Race & Ethnicity 35 Foreign-Born Education 36 Young & College-Educated 37 Residence of Young Professionals 39 Families 40 Programs for Young Professionals 41 Anchor Academic Institutions Visitors 42–43 Visitors & Venues 45 Hotels & Occupancy 46 Section Three | Place Vibrancy 48–63 Amenities & Necessities 64–65 Pedestrians & Bicycles Housing 66–69 Units & Occupancy 70–71 Rents 72 Incentives 74 Section Four | Economy & Investment Employment 76 Employment, Employment Sectors & Growth 77 Wages 78–80 Commercial Space 82–91 Real Estate Development 92 Note on Data 94 Sources, Notes & Definitions Contributors & Contents 3 INTRODUCTION 7.2 square miles. That is Greater Downtown Detroit. A slice of Detroit’s 139-square mile geography. A 7.2 square mile collection of neighborhoods: Downtown, Midtown, Woodbridge, Eastern Market, Lafayette Park, Rivertown, and Corktown—and so much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Harris & Harris Opens New Downtown Detroit Office!
    PRESS RELEASE Harris & Harris Opens New Downtown Detroit Office! August, 2014 Harris & Harris is thrilled to announce the new location of the Detroit office! The water.new office is located in the Cadillac Tower in downtown Detroit at 65 Cadillac Square. This new space is just blocks away from Comerica Park and overlooks the Harris & Harris continues to grow and expand. This new office provides a new and bigger space for our Detroit employees with new technology and a fresher look! The new office in the Cadillac Tower is located in the heart of the Central Business District. The Cadillac Tower was the first building, outside of Chicago and New York City, to have 40 floors. This historic building plays a large role in the history of Detroit and we are thrilled to play a part in it. Harris & Harris continues to grow and expand, and this new office provides a new and bigger space for our Detroit employees with new technology and a fresher look! Moving into the business district of Detroit is beneficial for business, our employees and most importantly, for our clients and for growth! The new Harris & Harris Detroit Office is located downtown in the Cadillac Tower, just blocks away from Comerica Park! This is a very exciting time for Harris & Harris and it is an honor to share it with our clients and customers. Please feel free to reach out to your contact at Harris & Harris with any questions regarding this relocation. About Harris & Harris, Ltd. Harris & Harris is a Chicago-based collection firm, representing local and state government, gas and electric utilities, and hospital systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability
    SUSTAINABILITY Our Team will utilize sustainable design strategies to reduce energy consumption, reduce the use of fossil fuels, reduce water consumption and improve storm water management. Sustainable Sites The project will encourage the use of public mass transportation systems and include bike racks, interior secure bike storage facilities and preferred parking for low-emitting vehicles. A light colored roof will reduce the heat island effect and shielded light fixtures will reduce light pollution. Water Efficiency No potable water will be used for irrigation. Dual flush toilets, low flow lavatory fixtures and shower heads will reduce water use by over 30%. Energy and Atmosphere The buildings will use much less energy than typical structures and will utilize enhanced refrigerant management to reduce ozone depletion. Materials and Resources Our goal will be to have over 95% of construction waste recycled or salvaged, over 20% of all materials will include recycled content, and over 20% of all materials will be sourced regionally. Indoor Environmental Quality Low-emitting materials including sealants, adhesives, paints, coatings, flooring systems and composite wood products will reduce off-gassing. Controllability of lighting and thermal comfort will enhance student control over their indoor environment. Daylight views will allow natural lighting to supplement the high efficiency lighting systems. Innovation and Design Exemplary efforts will enhance construction waste management, views, and open space provisions while a Green Education
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit Welcome Booklet
    the red carpet Yes indeed, there’s a red carpet rolled out for you —a special deep plush one marked: WELCOME TO DETROIT! We’re really glad you’re visiting us and hope you’ll be too. Just wait ’til you’ve seen the lovely homes, the beautiful parks, the historical points of interest, the gigantic industry and you’ll feel about Detroit the way we do! We don’t mean to brag but it’s a fact that Detroit is known the world over as one of America’s most interesting convention cities and as you discover the city for yourself you’ll understand what we mean. It’s our sincere hope that you’ll have a wonderful time and that you will come back again —soon ! r” i DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS—One of the DETROIT PUBLIC LIBRARY—Home of over world’s finest art museums. 3l/i million books, pictures, maps, films, etc. RACKHAM EDUCATIONAL MEMORIAL NORTHLAND CENTER—One of the largest BUILDING—University of Michigan Extension shopping centers in the United States. A Service, home of Detroit engineering groups. $25,000,000 project. WAYNE UNIVERSITY—Centrally located, offers VETERANS’ MEMORIAL BUILDING extensive educational program to 18,000 students. A landmark in the new Civic Center. BRIGGS STADIUM—Home of the Detroit MARTHA-MARY CH A PEL—Greenfield Village, ’'Tigers” and the Detroit "Lions”. unequalled in the field of Americana. making tracks I I I around Detroit z I THESE ARE ON YOUR MUST-SEE LIST ART CENTER—Woodward Avenue between Warren and Kirby. Detroit Institute of Arts and Main Public Library.
    [Show full text]