THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION at 500 YEARS from RUPTURE to DIALOGUE Jaume Botey
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Martin Luther's Babylonian Captivity of the Church In
“BREAKING FREE”: MARTIN LUTHER’S BABYLONIAN CAPTIVITY OF THE CHURCH IN CONTEXT BY REV. BENJAMIN P. SCHAEFER ~ MT. CALVARY, REDDING CA A PAPER PRESENTED AT THE SYMPOSIUM ON THE 1520 TREATISES OF MARTIN LUTHER PROFESSOR STEVEN PAGELS, REACTOR WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY MEQUON, WISCONSIN SEPTEMBER 21-22, 2020 Introduction - Jesu, Juve “Where faith dies and the word of faith is silent, there works and the prescribing of works immediately crowd into their place. By them we have been carried away out of our own land, as into a Babylonian captivity, and despoiled of all our precious possessions.”1 Such was the state of captivity which Martin Luther attacks in his treatise, The Babylonian Captivity of the Church. And attack he did. “This was Luther’s most radical criticism of the church so far, and would alienate some of his reform-minded supporters. This was because this treatise made clear that Luther was not in fact seeking changes to the existing church; he wanted a completely different one instead.”2 Whether Luther purposefully desired a different church is the subject of debate, but at the very least he was laying the groundwork for a church free from papal tyranny. “This assault on Catholic teaching was more devastating than anything that had preceded it.”3 Because of this the Babylonian Captivity galvanized both Luther’s opponents and supporters. It became the central work for which Luther had to answer at the Diet of Worms in 1521.4 Martin Luther was not only a brilliant teacher, preacher, pastor, and expositor of Scripture. He was also a publishing genius who understood the value of mass communication. -
AP European History: Unit – 2 - Age of Reformation Practice Test
AP European History: Unit – 2 - Age of Reformation Practice Test Question 1 In this passage, Martin Luther advocated for A. justification by faith B. justification by works C. development of the science of astronomy D. the Bible as the sole source of religious authority Question 2 The Catholic church’s response to the scientific ideas expressed above was to A. encourage these scientific ideas, as the church opposed Martin Luther B. suppress scientific ideas, as the church opposed scientific research C. privately encourage scientific research but publicly condemn it D. remain neutral, as science was not related to religion Question 3 One of the causes of the Reformation was A. Corruption and abuses in the Catholic church. B. Poverty of the Catholic Church. C. Scholastic criticism of church hierarchy. D. Charles V's Peace of Augsburg Question 4 Major Protestant reformers included all these people EXCEPT A. Martin Luther B. Huldrich Zwingli C. Erasmus of Rotterdam D. John Calvin Question 5 With which of the following viewpoints would John George agree? A. The Counter-Reformation should continue B. Debate among intellectuals should be admired C. Each prince should determine the religion of his people D. The Jesuits should be excommunicated Question 6 John George explains, from his perspective, the causes of the A. German peasants revolt B. English Civil War C. War of the Three Henrys D. Thirty Years’ War Question 7 The 1521 Diet of Worms was A. an assembly convened by the Holy Roman Emperor in order to discuss matters of state and church affairs B. A meeting of church officials to decide the fate of Martin Luther C. -
Concordia Theological Quarterly
CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 83:3–4 July/October 2019 Table of Contents After Canons, Councils, and Popes: The Implications of Luther’s Leipzig Debate for Lutheran Ecclesiology Richard J. Serina Jr. ...................................................................................... 195 The Leipzig Debate and Theological Method Roland F. Ziegler .......................................................................................... 213 Luther and Liberalism: A Tale of Two Tales (Or, A Lutheran Showdown Worth Having) Korey D. Maas .............................................................................................. 229 Scripture as Philosophy in Origen’s Contra Celsum Adam C. Koontz ........................................................................................... 237 Passion and Persecution in the Gospels Peter J. Scaer .................................................................................................. 251 Reclaiming Moral Reasoning: Wisdom as the Scriptural Conception of Natural Law Gifford A. Grobien ....................................................................................... 267 Anthropology: A Brief Discourse David P. Scaer ............................................................................................... 287 Reclaiming the Easter Vigil and Reclaiming Our Real Story Randy K. Asburry ......................................................................................... 325 Theological Observer ................................................................................................ -
The Equipping Church: Recapturing God’S Vision for the Priesthood of All Believers
THE EQUIPPING CHURCH: RECAPTURING GOD’S VISION FOR THE PRIESTHOOD OF ALL BELIEVERS. A BIBLICAL, HISTORICAL, AND REFORMED PERSPECTIVE. A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF MINISTRY BY JUSTIN CARRUTHERS AUGUST 2019 Copyright© 2019 by Justin Carruthers All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The Equipping Church: Recapturing God’s Vision for the Priesthood of All Believers. A Biblical, Historical, and Reformed Perspective Justin Carruthers Doctor of Ministry School of Theology, Fuller Theological Seminary 2019 Many protestant versions of believers’ royal priesthood, including the Christian Reformed Church in North America, are missionally inadequate: priestly functions are often monopolized by the Ministerial Priesthood,1 which leads to the defrocking of the ministry of the priesthood of all believers. In essence, the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers is treated as though it is a true, factual, and fascinating piece of Christian doctrine, but is not always practically lived out in local congregations. We believe in it in theory, but not in practice. A biblical and missional understanding of the church must root the priesthood of all believers in baptism, the initiatory rite that ordains all people into priestly service in the world. A proper re-framing of the priesthood of all believers will serve as the catalyst for a more robust ecclesiology and will be the impetus for the royal priesthood to commit to their earthly vocation to be witnesses of Christ in the world. Content Reader: Dr. David Rylaarsdam Words: 185 1 In the case of the CRCNA, there are four offices of the Ministerial Priesthood: Minister of the Word, Elder, Deacon, and Commissioned Pastor. -
Martin Luther
TRUTHmatters October 2002 Volume II, Issue 4 ous errors of John Wycliffe who said ‘It is not MARTIN LUTHER necessary for salvation to believe that the Ro- (This is the second of two articles) man Church is above all others.’ And you are espousing the pestilent errors of John Hus, We shift now to Luther’s work in the who claimed that Peter neither was nor is the following two to three years. It has already been head of the Holy Catholic Church.” mentioned that he was catapulted into the fore- This was dangerous ground for Luther ground and the next two or three years were to be on because John Hus had been burned as both hard and rewarding to the Augustinian a heretic and if Luther could be forced into this monk. I will only cover two of these most im- stand, he could also be called a heretic. A portant events. The Leipzig Debate in July of lunch break was due and during this break Lu- 1519 and the famous Diet of Worms in 1521. ther went to the library and quickly looked up The Leipzig debate was held in the large what Hus had believed and found that it was hall of the Castle of Pleissenberg at Leipzig. The exactly what he believed. In the afternoon ses- debate was between Johann Eck who repre- sion, Luther astonished the whole assembly by sented the Roman church and Dr. Carlstadt and declaring in effect: “Ja, Ich bin ein Hussite” or Dr. Martin Luther. It was a great intellectual “Yes, I am a Hussite.” It is from this debate battle that lasted three weeks. -
Why Not Rescind the 1521 Excommunication of Luther?
From Conflict to Communion: Why not rescind the 1521 excommunication of Luther? The point of lifting personal excommunications posthumously is not for the repose of the souls of the excommunicated. It is to take away the public rejection of that person and the scandal caused by the condemnation. The following material is a chapter from the article, “From Conflict to Communion: Going Home to Rome,” which addresses various issues in the LWF/Vatican report From Conflict to Communion (C2C). C2C purports to be a candid look at where things stand between Lutherans and Roman Catholics. In fact C2C has an agenda: It directs Lutherans to be PC so that in time they can be RC. The full article includes the following chapters: 1. Lutherans and Catholics agree/disagree on baptism. 2. C2C declares JDDJ has the “highest level of authority.” (¶97) 3. Justification must decrease so that unity may increase. 4. C2C conceals the Catholic rejection of “faith alone.” 5. C2C’s focus on “Luther’s theology” disguises a caricature of Luther. 6. Why not rescind the 1521 excommunication of Luther? 7. C2C creates a caricature of Luther on scripture by omitting its gospel center. 8. C2C hides the Vatican view: Lutherans are not really, truly “Church.” 9. C2C assumes papal primacy and infallibility are inevitable. 10. Mary, Mary, why are they hiding you? 11. C2C glides over the ordination of women. 12. C2C kicks the can down the road: Lutherans must concede to unity on Rome’s terms. * * * * * 6. Why not rescind the 1521 excommunication of Luther? On June 15, 1520, Pope Leo X issued his bull, Exsurge Domine (“Arise, O Lord, and judge your cause….The wild boar from the forest seeks to destroy [the vineyard]”), threatening Luther, “the wild boar,” with excommunication. -
Declaration on the Way Church, Ministry, and Eucharist
Declaration on the Way Church, Ministry, and Eucharist Committee on Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Copyright © 2015 Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Published by Augsburg Fortress. Permission is granted to download and reproduce a single copy of this publication for individual, non-commercial use. Copies for group use and study are available for purchase at www.augsburgfortress.org. Please direct other permission requests to [email protected]. Augsburg Fortress Minneapolis DECLARATION ON THE WAY Church, Ministry, and Eucharist Copyright © 2015 Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of Augs- burg Fortress, PO Box 1209, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 or United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 3211 Fourth Street NE, Wash- ington, DC 20017. Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Cover art: The Road to Emmaus by He Qi (www.heqiart.com) Cover design: Laurie Ingram Book design: PerfecType, Nashville, TN Print ISBN: 978-1-5064-1616-8 eBook ISBN: 978-1-5064-1617-5 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z329.48-1984. -
Confessio Im Konflikt Religiöse Selbst- Und Fremdwahrnehmung in Der Frühen Neuzeit
Mona Garloff / Christian Volkmar Witt (Hg.) Confessio im Konflikt Religiöse Selbst- und Fremdwahrnehmung in der Frühen Neuzeit. Ein Studienbuch © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Europäische Geschichte Mainz Abteilung für Abendländische Religionsgeschichte Herausgegeben von Irene Dingel Beiheft 129 © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Confessio im Konflikt Religiöse Selbst- und Fremdwahrnehmung in der Frühen Neuzeit Ein Studienbuch Herausgegeben von Mona Garloff und Christian Volkmar Witt Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Die Publikation wurde gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über https://dnb.de abrufbar. © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Theaterstraße 13, D-37073 Göttingen Dieses Material steht unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International. Um eine Kopie dieser Lizenz zu sehen, besuchen Sie http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/. Satz: Vanessa Weber, Mainz Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Verlage | www.vandenhoeck-ruprecht-verlage.com ISSN 2197-1056 ISBN (Print) 978-3-525-57142-2 ISBN (OA) 978-3-666-57142-8 https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Inhalt Vorwort .............................................................................................................. 7 Christian V. Witt Wahrnehmung, Konflikt und Confessio. Eine Einleitung ........................ -
Universal Priesthood: an Exegesis of 1 Peter 2:1-10
THE UNIVERSAL PRIESTHOOD: An Exegesis of 1 Peter 2:1–101 Michael K. Smith Introduction “Tell me a little about yourself.” When we hear that line from someone with whom we’re not well-acquainted we usually launch into something like this: “Well, I’m forty years old (or was that forty-one?), married to a beautiful woman, have two children; we live in North Mankato, which is right next to Mankato, MN, where I teach at Bethany Lutheran College….” Many factors come to mind when we think of who we are—our identity. In his first letter, Peter continually reminds his readers of their identity. Rather than focus on inane worldly details, he zeroes in on what’s most important: our standing in the eyes of God, or our place in His kingdom. The section under scrutiny bears this identification out especially through the use of contrast. Peter reminds his readers of who they were prior to being made part of God’s family, contrasting that non-status with the present reality of what God had made them. This was especially important for Peter’s readers as they compared themselves to the unbelievers around them, and as they fought to retain hope in what may have seemed like hopeless times. Isagogical Comments Authorship: The apostle Peter is clearly identified as the author of this letter (1:12). Additional internal and the external evidence point to his authorship, and there have not been serious challenges to it historically. The date and place of writing: No date of writing is given by Peter, nor is there a link to any one specific historic event. -
Die Bibelübersetzung Martin Luthers
TY3003 – Sprachwissenschaftlicher D-Aufsatz Björn Kinding – Högskolan Dalarna VT11 TY3003 – Sprachwissenschaftlicher D-Aufsatz Björn Kinding – Högskolan Dalarna VT11 DIE BIBELÜBERSETZUNG MARTIN LUTHERS: EINE SOZIOLINGUISTISCHE ANALYSE DER ABSICHT, DER METHODE UND DER AUSWIRKUNG - 1/87 - TY3003 – Sprachwissenschaftlicher D-Aufsatz Björn Kinding – Högskolan Dalarna VT11 Abstrakt Brundin (2004, S. 63) sagt, dass sich die Reformation „um einen Kampf handelte, der Auswirkungen auf die ganze gesellschaftliche Struktur hatte.“ Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist die Absichten hinter, die linguistischen Methoden und die sozialen Auswirkungen der Bibelübersetzung Luthers festzustellen, und dadurch die Aussage Brundins zu bestätigen bzw. widerlegen. Es wurde gefunden, dass Martin Luther die Bibelübersetzung und die Reformation in enger Zusammenarbeit mit seinen Kollegen an der Leucorea Universität und unter Führung des sächsischen Kurfürsten, Friedrich III., durchgeführt hat. Dabei haben die verwendeten linguistischen Methoden eine Schlüsselrolle gespielt, und viele heute bekannten wissenschaftlichen Theorien sind praktisch umgesetzt worden. Dazu gehören die Sapir-Whorf-Hypothese, die Defizit- bzw. die Differenzhypothese und die Diskurstheorie. Die Reformation hat eine gewaltige Machtverschiebung zur Folge, wo der Klerus dem Adel viele Rechte abgeben müsste, und die neu erzeugte Sprache der Lutherbibel hat zu einer deutschen Einheitssprache und die Erstehung eines deutschen Nationalstaates geführt. Als Schlussergebnis kann die Aussage Brundins klar bestätigt -
Martin Luther Extended Timeline Session 1
TIMELINES: MARTIN LUTHER & CHRISTIAN HISTORY A. LUTHER the MAN (1483 – 1546) 1502: Receives B.A. at University of Erfurt 1505: Earns M.A. at Erfurt; begins to study law 1505 Luther “struck by lightning” and vows to become a monk 1505 Luther enters the Order of Augustinian Hermits 1507: Luther is ordained and celebrates his first Mass; he panics during the ceremony 1510: Luther visits Rome as representative of Augustinians 1511: Luther transfers to Wittenberg to teach at the new university. 1512: Luther earns his doctorate of theology 1513: Luther begins lecturing on The Psalms 1515: Luther lectures on Paul’s Epistles to the Romans 1517: October 31, he posts his “95 Theses (points to debate)” concerning indulgences on Wittenberg Church door. 1518: At meeting in Augsburg, Luther defends his theology & refuses to recant 1518: Elector Frederick the Wise of Saxony places Luther under his protection. 1519: In debates with Professor John Eck at Leipzig, Luther denies supreme authority of popes and councils 1520: Papal bull (Exsurge Domine) gives Luther 60 days to recant or be excommunicated 1520: Luther burns the papal bull and writes 3 seminal documents: “To the Christian Nobility,” “On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church,” & “The Freedom of a Christian” 1521: Luther is excommunicated by the papal bull Decet Romanum Pontificem 1521: He refuses to recant his writings at the Diet of Worms 1521: New HRE Charles V condemns Luther as heretic and outlaw Luther is “kidnapped” and hidden in Wartburg Castle Luther begins translating the New Testament -
Chronology of the Reformation 1320: John Wycliffe Is Born in Yorkshire
Chronology of the Reformation 1320: John Wycliffe is born in Yorkshire, England 1369?: Jan Hus, born in Husinec, Bohemia, early reformer and founder of Moravian Church 1384: John Wycliffe died in his parish, he and his followers made the first full English translation of the Bible 6 July 1415: Jan Hus arrested, imprisoned, tried and burned at the stake while attending the Council of Constance, followed one year later by his disciple Jerome. Both sang hymns as they died 11 November 1418: Martin V elected pope and Great Western Schism is ended 1444: Johannes Reuchlin is born, becomes the father of the study of Hebrew and Greek in Germany 21 September 1452: Girolamo Savonarola is born in Ferrara, Italy, is a Dominican friar at age 22 29 May 1453 Constantine is captured by Ottoman Turks, the end of the Byzantine Empire 1454?: Gütenberg Bible printed in Mainz, Germany by Johann Gütenberg 1463: Elector Fredrick III (the Wise) of Saxony is born (died in 1525) 1465 : Johannes Tetzel is born in Pirna, Saxony 1472: Lucas Cranach the Elder born in Kronach, later becomes court painter to Frederick the Wise 1480: Andreas Bodenstein (Karlstadt) is born, later to become a teacher at the University of Wittenberg where he became associated with Luther. Strong in his zeal, weak in judgment, he represented all the worst of the outer fringes of the Reformation 10 November 1483: Martin Luther born in Eisleben 11 November 1483: Luther baptized at St. Peter and St. Paul Church, Eisleben (St. Martin’s Day) 1 January 1484: Ulrich Zwingli the first great Swiss