THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION at 500 YEARS from RUPTURE to DIALOGUE Jaume Botey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION at 500 YEARS from RUPTURE to DIALOGUE Jaume Botey THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION AT 500 YEARS FROM RUPTURE TO DIALOGUE Jaume Botey 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 3 2. Luther’s personality and the theme of justification ...................... 7 3. The great controversies, and the progressive development of his thought ................................................................. 10 4. The great treatises of 1520 and the diet of worms .......................... 16 5. The peasants’ war .................................................................................... 21 6. Consolidation of the reformation ....................................................... 24 7. Epilogue .................................................................................................... 28 Notes ............................................................................................................. 31 Bibliography ................................................................................................. 32 In memory… In February, while we were preparing the English edition of this booklet, its author, Jaume Botey Vallés, passed away. As a member of the Cristianisme i Justícia team, Jaume was a person profoundly committed to ecumenical and interreligious dialogue, and he worked energetically for peace and for the other world that is possible. Jaume, we will miss you greatly. Cristianisme i Justícia Jaume Botey has a licentiate in philosophy and theology and a doctorate in anthropology. He has been a professor of the History of Culture at the Universitat Autònoma of Barcelona. He has published the book El collapse del sistema. Bases per a pensar el nou milleni (2014) [The collapse of the system: bases for thinking about the new millennium] and in this collection: Bush and his God (booklet 118, June 2004). He is a member of the team of Cristianisme i Justícia. Publisher: CRISTIANISME I JUSTÍCIA - Roger de Llúria 13 - 08010 Barcelona +34 93 317 23 38 - [email protected] - www.cristianismeijusticia.net Printed by: Ediciones Rondas S.L. - Legal deposit: B 6852-2018 ISBN: 978-84-9730-412-2 - ISSN: 2014-6566 - ISSN (virtual edition): 2014-6574 Editor: Santi Torres i Rocaginé - Translated by Joseph Owens Cover drawing: Roger Torres - Layout: Pilar Rubio Tugas Printed on recycled paper - March 2018 Privacy Policy: The Fundació Lluís Espinal makes it known that your data are kept in a file under the name BDGACIJ, legal title of the Fundació Lluís Espinal. These are used only for providing the services we render you and for keeping you informed of our activities. You may exercise your rights of access, rectification, cancelation or disagreement by writing to the Fundació in c/Roger de Llúria, 13, 08010 Barcelona. 1. INTRODUCTION On 31 October 2017 some 500 years will have passed since Luther, ac- cording to legend, nailed his treatise about indulgences on the door of the church of the Wittenberg castle. That date is considered the beginning of the Protestant Reformation. The treatise caused a rupture that went be- yond the religious terms in which it was presented. The consequences of this cataclysm revealed the existence in Europe of two different cultures, two models of social relations, two forms of understanding politics and power, and even two economic models, which are evident to this day in the differences between northern Europe and Mediterranean Europe. The doubts and misgivings of a decadent ing-point of its main protagonist, Martin society became evident in the great de- Luther. bates that took place concerning ration- alist and empirical models, Platonism and Aristotelianism, lay power and hier- 1.1. Attempts at reform before archy, the Church’s temporal power and the Reformation poverty, faith and religion. At the same time, the society was conscious that it Luther’s movement was an indication of contained within itself the seeds of a new the deep fissures that had been appear- model that was just being born. Many of ing since the end of the 13th century; the those debates that roiled the early years bonds between papacy and Empire on of the Renaissance have become once which feudalism was based had become again topics of debate in today’s world, frayed. The symptoms announcing a in a society as perplexed as the society change of epoch included the birth of in- of those days. To understand today’s Eu- dividual conscience, the tendency toward rope it is important to understand the sit- secularization, the desire for a new mod- uation that produced the Reformation of el of social relations, the appearance of the 16th century and especially the start- new inventions (printing press, compass, 3 etc.), the new vision of the universe pro- in personal experience and contempla- posed by Copernicus and Galileo, the in- tion than in the rational, deductive pro- cipient capitalism, and the development cesses of scholasticism. What all these of nationalism and nation-states. Scho- movements had in common was the con- lastic philosophy and theology were in viction that “truth” is expressed more in decline, nominalism was ascendant, and deeds than in words, that a ready will is the empirical method became an impor- more important than rational knowledge, tant source of knowledge. In the religious and that personal experience of faith is sphere, there was a growing awareness worth more than intellectual grasp of a of the need to reform the Church, which dogma. They all agreed on the need to was too closely tied to temporal interests. return to primitive Christianity and a The late Middle Ages saw frequent Church that is poor. They wanted the sa- proposals and attempts to reform the cred texts to be available in the language Church, most of them sincere. We could of the people, and they promoted a warm mention Saint Bernard (11th century), and tender devotion to the human figure who completely renewed the monastery of Jesus. They had little tolerance for hi- movement, or Saint Francis (13th century), erarchy and extravagant liturgies. These who introduced a new model of spiritual- movements were a sign of the profound ity geared to city life and stressing evan- religious and moral crisis of the ecclesi- gelical imitation of the poor Jesus. In the astical institution. kingdom of Aragón we have figures like Giving priority to experiential knowl- Ramon Llull, Eiximenis, and Arnau de edge meant downplaying knowledge Vilanova. At the same time, there arose about the supposed “articles of faith,” a series of movements that wavered be- which were impossible to demonstrate tween fidelity and dissent; find them- in any case. Questions were therefore selves in constant conflict with the hierar- raised concerning concepts about whose chy and the Empire, they were persecuted meaning we cannot be certain, such as by both. For example, the Beguines and “justification,” “salvation,” “grace,” and the Beghards in the Low Countries and “forgiveness.” This stance was one of the the Waldensians (or the “Poor of Lyon”) effects of nominalism, which held that in northern Italy were movements that are priority should be given to knowledge now considered predecessors of Protes- that proceeds from reality, that is, from tantism, as was the movement of the Ca- concrete things that we see and touch, thars and Albigensians in southern Franc- rather than to the names or concepts of es in the 13th century. All of them suffered abstract philosophy. From this position severe persecution. it was just a further step to declaring The beginnings of the 14th century that the papacy, the hierarchy, the sac- saw the rise of new forms of spirituality raments, and the Church were all human of a more mystical and subjective char- inventions placed at the service of those acter, such as the “Devotio Moderna.” words without content. Ockham was one It was a time when the mystics Eckhart of the main representatives of this cur- and Tauler thrived on the banks of the rent of thought. Rhine, while the Brothers of the Com- This way of thinking helps to explain mon Life were finding more inspiration the popularity of John Wycliffe and John 4 Huss, who were condemned during the and the people’s sovereignty in electing Council of Constance, at the height of the emperor. He consequently saw no the Western Schism. Wycliffe was al- need for the emperor to be consecrated ready dead when he was condemned, by the Pope. while Huss was burned at the stake. To- This was the context in which the day they are considered precursors of Renaissance took shape. The first great Protestantism. humanists, especially Thomas More and The history of these centuries shows Erasmus of Rotterdam, contemporaries that the “rupture,” to give it a name, had of Luther, gave evidence of both rup- taken place prior to Luther. “Everything ture and continuity. They did not want that needed to be reformed but was not to break with anything, but they were became the cause and the justification of aware that the previous political unity, the Reformation.”1 with its concepts and social model, had come to an end. Socially and politically, the Holy Ro- 1.2. The situation of the Empire man Empire was a fragmented polity, di- and the Church vided into small states that were relatively autonomous –duchies, counties, ecclesi- The Church was at one of its lowest astical domains, and small city-states– all points. Since the 11th century there had of which were controlled by princes and been a long struggle between the Pope the great noble families of feudal times. and the secular powers about investiture,
Recommended publications
  • Martin Luther's Babylonian Captivity of the Church In
    “BREAKING FREE”: MARTIN LUTHER’S BABYLONIAN CAPTIVITY OF THE CHURCH IN CONTEXT BY REV. BENJAMIN P. SCHAEFER ~ MT. CALVARY, REDDING CA A PAPER PRESENTED AT THE SYMPOSIUM ON THE 1520 TREATISES OF MARTIN LUTHER PROFESSOR STEVEN PAGELS, REACTOR WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY MEQUON, WISCONSIN SEPTEMBER 21-22, 2020 Introduction - Jesu, Juve “Where faith dies and the word of faith is silent, there works and the prescribing of works immediately crowd into their place. By them we have been carried away out of our own land, as into a Babylonian captivity, and despoiled of all our precious possessions.”1 Such was the state of captivity which Martin Luther attacks in his treatise, The Babylonian Captivity of the Church. And attack he did. “This was Luther’s most radical criticism of the church so far, and would alienate some of his reform-minded supporters. This was because this treatise made clear that Luther was not in fact seeking changes to the existing church; he wanted a completely different one instead.”2 Whether Luther purposefully desired a different church is the subject of debate, but at the very least he was laying the groundwork for a church free from papal tyranny. “This assault on Catholic teaching was more devastating than anything that had preceded it.”3 Because of this the Babylonian Captivity galvanized both Luther’s opponents and supporters. It became the central work for which Luther had to answer at the Diet of Worms in 1521.4 Martin Luther was not only a brilliant teacher, preacher, pastor, and expositor of Scripture. He was also a publishing genius who understood the value of mass communication.
    [Show full text]
  • AP European History: Unit – 2 - Age of Reformation Practice Test
    AP European History: Unit – 2 - Age of Reformation Practice Test Question 1 In this passage, Martin Luther advocated for A. justification by faith B. justification by works C. development of the science of astronomy D. the Bible as the sole source of religious authority Question 2 The Catholic church’s response to the scientific ideas expressed above was to A. encourage these scientific ideas, as the church opposed Martin Luther B. suppress scientific ideas, as the church opposed scientific research C. privately encourage scientific research but publicly condemn it D. remain neutral, as science was not related to religion Question 3 One of the causes of the Reformation was A. Corruption and abuses in the Catholic church. B. Poverty of the Catholic Church. C. Scholastic criticism of church hierarchy. D. Charles V's Peace of Augsburg Question 4 Major Protestant reformers included all these people EXCEPT A. Martin Luther B. Huldrich Zwingli C. Erasmus of Rotterdam D. John Calvin Question 5 With which of the following viewpoints would John George agree? A. The Counter-Reformation should continue B. Debate among intellectuals should be admired C. Each prince should determine the religion of his people D. The Jesuits should be excommunicated Question 6 John George explains, from his perspective, the causes of the A. German peasants revolt B. English Civil War C. War of the Three Henrys D. Thirty Years’ War Question 7 The 1521 Diet of Worms was A. an assembly convened by the Holy Roman Emperor in order to discuss matters of state and church affairs B. A meeting of church officials to decide the fate of Martin Luther C.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia Theological Quarterly
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 83:3–4 July/October 2019 Table of Contents After Canons, Councils, and Popes: The Implications of Luther’s Leipzig Debate for Lutheran Ecclesiology Richard J. Serina Jr. ...................................................................................... 195 The Leipzig Debate and Theological Method Roland F. Ziegler .......................................................................................... 213 Luther and Liberalism: A Tale of Two Tales (Or, A Lutheran Showdown Worth Having) Korey D. Maas .............................................................................................. 229 Scripture as Philosophy in Origen’s Contra Celsum Adam C. Koontz ........................................................................................... 237 Passion and Persecution in the Gospels Peter J. Scaer .................................................................................................. 251 Reclaiming Moral Reasoning: Wisdom as the Scriptural Conception of Natural Law Gifford A. Grobien ....................................................................................... 267 Anthropology: A Brief Discourse David P. Scaer ............................................................................................... 287 Reclaiming the Easter Vigil and Reclaiming Our Real Story Randy K. Asburry ......................................................................................... 325 Theological Observer ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Equipping Church: Recapturing God’S Vision for the Priesthood of All Believers
    THE EQUIPPING CHURCH: RECAPTURING GOD’S VISION FOR THE PRIESTHOOD OF ALL BELIEVERS. A BIBLICAL, HISTORICAL, AND REFORMED PERSPECTIVE. A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF MINISTRY BY JUSTIN CARRUTHERS AUGUST 2019 Copyright© 2019 by Justin Carruthers All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The Equipping Church: Recapturing God’s Vision for the Priesthood of All Believers. A Biblical, Historical, and Reformed Perspective Justin Carruthers Doctor of Ministry School of Theology, Fuller Theological Seminary 2019 Many protestant versions of believers’ royal priesthood, including the Christian Reformed Church in North America, are missionally inadequate: priestly functions are often monopolized by the Ministerial Priesthood,1 which leads to the defrocking of the ministry of the priesthood of all believers. In essence, the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers is treated as though it is a true, factual, and fascinating piece of Christian doctrine, but is not always practically lived out in local congregations. We believe in it in theory, but not in practice. A biblical and missional understanding of the church must root the priesthood of all believers in baptism, the initiatory rite that ordains all people into priestly service in the world. A proper re-framing of the priesthood of all believers will serve as the catalyst for a more robust ecclesiology and will be the impetus for the royal priesthood to commit to their earthly vocation to be witnesses of Christ in the world. Content Reader: Dr. David Rylaarsdam Words: 185 1 In the case of the CRCNA, there are four offices of the Ministerial Priesthood: Minister of the Word, Elder, Deacon, and Commissioned Pastor.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther
    TRUTHmatters October 2002 Volume II, Issue 4 ous errors of John Wycliffe who said ‘It is not MARTIN LUTHER necessary for salvation to believe that the Ro- (This is the second of two articles) man Church is above all others.’ And you are espousing the pestilent errors of John Hus, We shift now to Luther’s work in the who claimed that Peter neither was nor is the following two to three years. It has already been head of the Holy Catholic Church.” mentioned that he was catapulted into the fore- This was dangerous ground for Luther ground and the next two or three years were to be on because John Hus had been burned as both hard and rewarding to the Augustinian a heretic and if Luther could be forced into this monk. I will only cover two of these most im- stand, he could also be called a heretic. A portant events. The Leipzig Debate in July of lunch break was due and during this break Lu- 1519 and the famous Diet of Worms in 1521. ther went to the library and quickly looked up The Leipzig debate was held in the large what Hus had believed and found that it was hall of the Castle of Pleissenberg at Leipzig. The exactly what he believed. In the afternoon ses- debate was between Johann Eck who repre- sion, Luther astonished the whole assembly by sented the Roman church and Dr. Carlstadt and declaring in effect: “Ja, Ich bin ein Hussite” or Dr. Martin Luther. It was a great intellectual “Yes, I am a Hussite.” It is from this debate battle that lasted three weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Not Rescind the 1521 Excommunication of Luther?
    From Conflict to Communion: Why not rescind the 1521 excommunication of Luther? The point of lifting personal excommunications posthumously is not for the repose of the souls of the excommunicated. It is to take away the public rejection of that person and the scandal caused by the condemnation. The following material is a chapter from the article, “From Conflict to Communion: Going Home to Rome,” which addresses various issues in the LWF/Vatican report From Conflict to Communion (C2C). C2C purports to be a candid look at where things stand between Lutherans and Roman Catholics. In fact C2C has an agenda: It directs Lutherans to be PC so that in time they can be RC. The full article includes the following chapters: 1. Lutherans and Catholics agree/disagree on baptism. 2. C2C declares JDDJ has the “highest level of authority.” (¶97) 3. Justification must decrease so that unity may increase. 4. C2C conceals the Catholic rejection of “faith alone.” 5. C2C’s focus on “Luther’s theology” disguises a caricature of Luther. 6. Why not rescind the 1521 excommunication of Luther? 7. C2C creates a caricature of Luther on scripture by omitting its gospel center. 8. C2C hides the Vatican view: Lutherans are not really, truly “Church.” 9. C2C assumes papal primacy and infallibility are inevitable. 10. Mary, Mary, why are they hiding you? 11. C2C glides over the ordination of women. 12. C2C kicks the can down the road: Lutherans must concede to unity on Rome’s terms. * * * * * 6. Why not rescind the 1521 excommunication of Luther? On June 15, 1520, Pope Leo X issued his bull, Exsurge Domine (“Arise, O Lord, and judge your cause….The wild boar from the forest seeks to destroy [the vineyard]”), threatening Luther, “the wild boar,” with excommunication.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration on the Way Church, Ministry, and Eucharist
    Declaration on the Way Church, Ministry, and Eucharist Committee on Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Copyright © 2015 Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Published by Augsburg Fortress. Permission is granted to download and reproduce a single copy of this publication for individual, non-commercial use. Copies for group use and study are available for purchase at www.augsburgfortress.org. Please direct other permission requests to [email protected]. Augsburg Fortress Minneapolis DECLARATION ON THE WAY Church, Ministry, and Eucharist Copyright © 2015 Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of Augs- burg Fortress, PO Box 1209, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 or United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 3211 Fourth Street NE, Wash- ington, DC 20017. Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Cover art: The Road to Emmaus by He Qi (www.heqiart.com) Cover design: Laurie Ingram Book design: PerfecType, Nashville, TN Print ISBN: 978-1-5064-1616-8 eBook ISBN: 978-1-5064-1617-5 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z329.48-1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Confessio Im Konflikt Religiöse Selbst- Und Fremdwahrnehmung in Der Frühen Neuzeit
    Mona Garloff / Christian Volkmar Witt (Hg.) Confessio im Konflikt Religiöse Selbst- und Fremdwahrnehmung in der Frühen Neuzeit. Ein Studienbuch © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Europäische Geschichte Mainz Abteilung für Abendländische Religionsgeschichte Herausgegeben von Irene Dingel Beiheft 129 © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Confessio im Konflikt Religiöse Selbst- und Fremdwahrnehmung in der Frühen Neuzeit Ein Studienbuch Herausgegeben von Mona Garloff und Christian Volkmar Witt Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Die Publikation wurde gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über https://dnb.de abrufbar. © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Theaterstraße 13, D-37073 Göttingen Dieses Material steht unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International. Um eine Kopie dieser Lizenz zu sehen, besuchen Sie http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/. Satz: Vanessa Weber, Mainz Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Verlage | www.vandenhoeck-ruprecht-verlage.com ISSN 2197-1056 ISBN (Print) 978-3-525-57142-2 ISBN (OA) 978-3-666-57142-8 https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 © 2019, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666571428 | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Inhalt Vorwort .............................................................................................................. 7 Christian V. Witt Wahrnehmung, Konflikt und Confessio. Eine Einleitung ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Priesthood: an Exegesis of 1 Peter 2:1-10
    THE UNIVERSAL PRIESTHOOD: An Exegesis of 1 Peter 2:1–101 Michael K. Smith Introduction “Tell me a little about yourself.” When we hear that line from someone with whom we’re not well-acquainted we usually launch into something like this: “Well, I’m forty years old (or was that forty-one?), married to a beautiful woman, have two children; we live in North Mankato, which is right next to Mankato, MN, where I teach at Bethany Lutheran College….” Many factors come to mind when we think of who we are—our identity. In his first letter, Peter continually reminds his readers of their identity. Rather than focus on inane worldly details, he zeroes in on what’s most important: our standing in the eyes of God, or our place in His kingdom. The section under scrutiny bears this identification out especially through the use of contrast. Peter reminds his readers of who they were prior to being made part of God’s family, contrasting that non-status with the present reality of what God had made them. This was especially important for Peter’s readers as they compared themselves to the unbelievers around them, and as they fought to retain hope in what may have seemed like hopeless times. Isagogical Comments Authorship: The apostle Peter is clearly identified as the author of this letter (1:12). Additional internal and the external evidence point to his authorship, and there have not been serious challenges to it historically. The date and place of writing: No date of writing is given by Peter, nor is there a link to any one specific historic event.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Bibelübersetzung Martin Luthers
    TY3003 – Sprachwissenschaftlicher D-Aufsatz Björn Kinding – Högskolan Dalarna VT11 TY3003 – Sprachwissenschaftlicher D-Aufsatz Björn Kinding – Högskolan Dalarna VT11 DIE BIBELÜBERSETZUNG MARTIN LUTHERS: EINE SOZIOLINGUISTISCHE ANALYSE DER ABSICHT, DER METHODE UND DER AUSWIRKUNG - 1/87 - TY3003 – Sprachwissenschaftlicher D-Aufsatz Björn Kinding – Högskolan Dalarna VT11 Abstrakt Brundin (2004, S. 63) sagt, dass sich die Reformation „um einen Kampf handelte, der Auswirkungen auf die ganze gesellschaftliche Struktur hatte.“ Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist die Absichten hinter, die linguistischen Methoden und die sozialen Auswirkungen der Bibelübersetzung Luthers festzustellen, und dadurch die Aussage Brundins zu bestätigen bzw. widerlegen. Es wurde gefunden, dass Martin Luther die Bibelübersetzung und die Reformation in enger Zusammenarbeit mit seinen Kollegen an der Leucorea Universität und unter Führung des sächsischen Kurfürsten, Friedrich III., durchgeführt hat. Dabei haben die verwendeten linguistischen Methoden eine Schlüsselrolle gespielt, und viele heute bekannten wissenschaftlichen Theorien sind praktisch umgesetzt worden. Dazu gehören die Sapir-Whorf-Hypothese, die Defizit- bzw. die Differenzhypothese und die Diskurstheorie. Die Reformation hat eine gewaltige Machtverschiebung zur Folge, wo der Klerus dem Adel viele Rechte abgeben müsste, und die neu erzeugte Sprache der Lutherbibel hat zu einer deutschen Einheitssprache und die Erstehung eines deutschen Nationalstaates geführt. Als Schlussergebnis kann die Aussage Brundins klar bestätigt
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther Extended Timeline Session 1
    TIMELINES: MARTIN LUTHER & CHRISTIAN HISTORY A. LUTHER the MAN (1483 – 1546) 1502: Receives B.A. at University of Erfurt 1505: Earns M.A. at Erfurt; begins to study law 1505 Luther “struck by lightning” and vows to become a monk 1505 Luther enters the Order of Augustinian Hermits 1507: Luther is ordained and celebrates his first Mass; he panics during the ceremony 1510: Luther visits Rome as representative of Augustinians 1511: Luther transfers to Wittenberg to teach at the new university. 1512: Luther earns his doctorate of theology 1513: Luther begins lecturing on The Psalms 1515: Luther lectures on Paul’s Epistles to the Romans 1517: October 31, he posts his “95 Theses (points to debate)” concerning indulgences on Wittenberg Church door. 1518: At meeting in Augsburg, Luther defends his theology & refuses to recant 1518: Elector Frederick the Wise of Saxony places Luther under his protection. 1519: In debates with Professor John Eck at Leipzig, Luther denies supreme authority of popes and councils 1520: Papal bull (Exsurge Domine) gives Luther 60 days to recant or be excommunicated 1520: Luther burns the papal bull and writes 3 seminal documents: “To the Christian Nobility,” “On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church,” & “The Freedom of a Christian” 1521: Luther is excommunicated by the papal bull Decet Romanum Pontificem 1521: He refuses to recant his writings at the Diet of Worms 1521: New HRE Charles V condemns Luther as heretic and outlaw Luther is “kidnapped” and hidden in Wartburg Castle Luther begins translating the New Testament
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of the Reformation 1320: John Wycliffe Is Born in Yorkshire
    Chronology of the Reformation 1320: John Wycliffe is born in Yorkshire, England 1369?: Jan Hus, born in Husinec, Bohemia, early reformer and founder of Moravian Church 1384: John Wycliffe died in his parish, he and his followers made the first full English translation of the Bible 6 July 1415: Jan Hus arrested, imprisoned, tried and burned at the stake while attending the Council of Constance, followed one year later by his disciple Jerome. Both sang hymns as they died 11 November 1418: Martin V elected pope and Great Western Schism is ended 1444: Johannes Reuchlin is born, becomes the father of the study of Hebrew and Greek in Germany 21 September 1452: Girolamo Savonarola is born in Ferrara, Italy, is a Dominican friar at age 22 29 May 1453 Constantine is captured by Ottoman Turks, the end of the Byzantine Empire 1454?: Gütenberg Bible printed in Mainz, Germany by Johann Gütenberg 1463: Elector Fredrick III (the Wise) of Saxony is born (died in 1525) 1465 : Johannes Tetzel is born in Pirna, Saxony 1472: Lucas Cranach the Elder born in Kronach, later becomes court painter to Frederick the Wise 1480: Andreas Bodenstein (Karlstadt) is born, later to become a teacher at the University of Wittenberg where he became associated with Luther. Strong in his zeal, weak in judgment, he represented all the worst of the outer fringes of the Reformation 10 November 1483: Martin Luther born in Eisleben 11 November 1483: Luther baptized at St. Peter and St. Paul Church, Eisleben (St. Martin’s Day) 1 January 1484: Ulrich Zwingli the first great Swiss
    [Show full text]