DOCSLIB.ORG

Interactions Between Migrating Birds and Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interactions Between Migrating Birds and Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms in the Northern Gulf of Mexico OCS Study MMS 2005-009 Coastal Marine Institute Interactions Between Migrating Birds and Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Final Report U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Agreement Minerals Management Service Coastal Marine Institute Gulf of Mexico OCS Region Louisiana State University OCS Study MMS 2005-009 Coastal Marine Institute Interactions Between Migrating Birds and Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Final Report Editor Robert W. Russell February 2005 Prepared under MMS Contract 1435-01-99-CA-30951-16808 by The Migration Over the Gulf Project School of the Coast and Environment Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Agreement Minerals Management Service Coastal Marine Institute Gulf of Mexico OCS Region Louisiana State University DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Minerals Management Service (MMS) and Louisiana State University. This report has been technically reviewed by the MMS, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the MMS, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with the MMS editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY Extra copies of this report may be obtained from the Public Information Office at the following address: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Gulf of Mexico OCS Region Public Information Office (MS 5034) 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard New Orleans, LA 70123-2394 Telephone: (504) 736-2519 or (800) 200-GULF CITATION Suggested citation: Russell, R.W. 2005. Interactions between migrating birds and offshore oil and gas platforms in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Final Report. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, LA. OCS Study MMS 2005-009. 348 pp. ABOUT THE COVER The cover art depicts a fallout of migrating birds and insects on a platform in the northern Gulf of Mexico and is the work of Brian P. Gibbons, a field biologist from Texas who spent nearly a year living offshore during this study. iii PREFACE This study entitled “Interactions Between Migrating Birds and Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms in the Northern Gulf of Mexico,” also known informally as the “Migration Over the Gulf Project” (MOGP), provides data and analyses of trans-Gulf bird migration from three years of intensive study on 13 platforms located in offshore waters in the northern Gulf of Mexico. The study was sponsored by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) to provide environmental information to the MMS concerning the possible influence of platforms on migrating birds. This volume focuses on broad-scale patterns of migration and presents general findings concerning the ecology of migrants on platforms and the influences of platforms on trans-Gulf migration. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report would not have been possible without the contributions of hundreds of people. First and foremost, thanks are due to the many dedicated field biologists who lived offshore for weeks or months at a time to conduct this study, listed here in descending order of time spent offshore: Rick Knight, Brian Gibbons, Mac Myers, Robert Russell, Jon King, Stacy Peterson, Mike Nelson, Karl Bardon, Alan Wormington, Dave Patton, Jeff Birdsley, Cameron Cox, Marshall Iliff, Brian Sullivan, Brian O’Shea, Dan Christian, John Arvin, Aaron Brees, Rick West, Matthew Holder, Arvind Panjabi, Jim Tietz, Laurence Binford, Paul Dickson, Richard Gibbons, Byron Stone, David Muth, Don Norman, and Dan Purrington. Thanks are also due to Diane Russell for providing logistical support to the project while Robert Russell was offshore. The collective pronouns “we,” “us,” and “our” are used throughout the text to acknowledge the important contributions of time, energy, and insight provided by the entire field team. A study of this magnitude could never have been conducted without the enthusiastic cooperation of the petroleum industry, and we were fortunate to have enjoyed extensive logistical support from British Petroleum, ChevronTexaco, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Newfield Exploration, and Shell Offshore. These companies provided long-term housing and large quantities of food to our offshore field personnel, as well as regular helicopter transportation to and from shore and administrative support on shore. Hundreds of people involved in many facets of the industry provided assistance with all aspects of the study, but special thanks go to Russell Putt (British Petroleum), Phil Smith (Shell Offshore), and Vince Cottone (ChevronTexaco) for securing access to critical platforms during the expanded phase of the study. Although they are too numerous to name individually, we thank the many crewmen on the platforms where we worked for their interest, support, and camaraderie. Thanks go to Mac Myers for devising the framework for the habitat classification scheme, and to Dave Patton, Mac Myers, and Stacy Peterson for assisting with synoptic weather classification. Dave Patton went well beyond the call of duty and invested a great deal of his own time downloading NEXRAD images for the radar component of the study. Many of the observers contributed photographs from their time offshore, and special thanks go to Dave Patton for contributing a large volume of outstanding material. Brian Gibbons assisted with enumeration and identification of insects in the light trap samples, and Lisa Peri completed the bulk of this laborious work. Victoria M. Bayless kindly made available facilities for storing and analyzing the insect samples at the Louisiana State Arthropod Museum. Alexis Lugo-Fernandez provided a copy of the Yocke et al. (2000) study, and Mark Yocke granted permission to reproduce the diagrammatic weather maps in Figure 5.1. Radar images and weather maps in Chapters 7-9 are included here courtesy of WSI Corporation, TAP Publishing Company, and Unisys Corporation. Special thanks to Brian Gibbons for creating the spectacular artwork that graces the cover of this report. This study was originally housed at the LSU Museum of Natural Science, where much of the administrative groundwork for the study was completed by Donald Norman, who negotiated access to the original platforms used in the study. Special thanks go to Russell Chapman and the staff of the LSU School of the Coast and Environment, who agreed to support the study after facilities at the museum became unavailable. Sidney Gauthreaux wishes to thank Alan Cunningham, Andrew Farnsworth, Steve Lohr, and David Mizrahi, who did most of the radar image quantification under his supervision and assisted in the preparation of the final subcontractor’s report. Sidney Gauthreaux also thanks Villere Reggio, Jr., who was responsible for his involvement in this project, and Carroll Belser, who provided valuable support throughout the project. vii This study was funded by the Minerals Management Service through the Louisiana State University Coastal Marine Institute (CMI) program under contracts 14-35-0001-30660 and 1435-01-99-CA-30951. Many thanks are due to the Minerals Management Service for its exceptional support of the study and for its patience during the delays while this report was being completed. We are grateful to Larry Rouse for his encouragement and support as Director of the LSU CMI. The Contracting Officer’s Technical Representatives (COTRs) for this study were Bob Rogers, Sam Holder, Jeff Childs, and Dave Moran. All of the COTRs provided valuable advice and support. Robert W. Russell viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FIGURES...................................................................................................................................................xiii TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................xvii Chapter 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................1 PART 1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................7 Chapter 2 Introduction...............................................................................................................................9 2.1 Background and Objectives ........................................................................................................9 2.2 Selection of Study Platforms.....................................................................................................10 2.3 Summary of Field Operations...................................................................................................15 Chapter 3 Field Methods .........................................................................................................................17 3.1 Platform Censuses.....................................................................................................................17 3.2 Flight Censuses .........................................................................................................................17 3.3 Census Schedules......................................................................................................................17 3.4 Opportunistic Work...................................................................................................................19
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus Northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation Valerie A
    Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 3-1-2011 Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation Valerie A. Lee Loma Linda University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Valerie A., "Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation" (2011). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 37. http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Science and Technology in conjunction with the Faculty of Graduate Studies ____________________ Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation by Valerie A. Lee ____________________ A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology ____________________ March 2011 © 2011 Valerie A. Lee All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this thesis in his/her opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree Master of Science. , Chairperson William K. Hayes, Professor of Biology Stephen G.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide Entomology & Nematology Department
    STUDY GUIDE ENTOMOLOGY & NEMATOLOGY DEPARTMENT DPM COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATIONS The Entomology & Nematology Comprehensive Examinations consist of 3 sections: pest identification (30%), pest biology and management (40%), and core concepts and synthesis (30%). These examinations are limited to information about invertebrate animal pests, principally insects and nematodes, but also plant feeding mites and terrestrial molluscs. A. Pest identification Students will be presented with insects, mites, molluscs, and nematodes that they must identify. Some may be recognizable by sight, but others may require keys for identification. Students will be provided with identification aids (keys), where necessary, and be expected to use them to identify the subjects accurately. The unknowns will be selected from the list of important insect, mite, mollusc, and nematode pests (Table 1) though we will emphasize those with a single or double asterisk [* or **]), as these normally are the more important pests. Included in this list are some that pose a threat but are not currently found in Florida. B. Pest biology and management Students will answer 8-10 questions on insect, mite, mollusc, and nematode pest biology (sampling, distribution, life cycle, damage) and management. The animals for which students are responsible to know biology and management are listed in Table 1 (preceded by double asterisk [**]). C. Core Concepts and Synthesis Section: Students will answer 3 or 4 questions that cover core areas of Entomology/Nematology and demonstrate knowledge of core areas, but also analysis and problem solving. Suggested reference/reading material is listed in Table 2. You might want to read through these in preparation for the Comprehensive Examinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Catalogue of the Family Sesiidae in China
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Jin, Q.; Wang, S. X.; Li, H. H. Catalogue of the family Sesiidae in China (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 36, núm. 144, diciembre, 2008, pp. 507-526 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45511220017 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 507-526 Catalogue of the family 10/12/08 10:40 Página 507 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 36 (144), diciembre 2008: 507-526 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 Catalogue of the family Sesiidae in China (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) Q. Jin, S. X. Wang & H. H. Li Abstract A catalogue of the family Sesiidae in China is provided based partially on the research of the previous literature and partially on the study of the specimens in our collection. A total of 108 species in 26 genera are listed, along with the available information of distribution and host plants. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Sesiidae, catalogue, host plants, distribution, China. Catálogo de la familia Sesiidae en China (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) Resumen Se presenta un catálogo de la familia Sesiidae en China basado parcialmente sobre las revisiones bibliográficas y parcialmente sobre el estudio de los especímenes en nuestra colección. Se da una lista de 108 especies en 26 géneros, así como la información disponible de su distribución y plantas nutricias.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemi-Riskline
    1998:4 The Nordic Expert Group for Criteria Documentation of Health Risks from Chemicals 122. Dichlorobenzenes Eivor Elovaara Nordic Council of Ministers arbete och hälsa vetenskaplig skriftserie ISBN 91–7045–460–4 ISSN 0346–7821 http://www.niwl.se/ah/ah.htm National Institute for Working Life National Institute for Working Life The National Institute for Working Life is Sweden's center for research and development on labour market, working life and work environment. Diffusion of infor- mation, training and teaching, local development and international collaboration are other important issues for the Institute. The R&D competence will be found in the following areas: Labour market and labour legislation, work organization and production technology, psychosocial working conditions, occupational medicine, allergy, effects on the nervous system, ergonomics, work environment technology and musculoskeletal disorders, chemical hazards and toxicology. A total of about 470 people work at the Institute, around 370 with research and development. The Institute’s staff includes 32 professors and in total 122 persons with a postdoctoral degree. The National Institute for Working Life has a large international collaboration in R&D, including a number of projects within the EC Framework Programme for Research and Technology Development. ARBETE OCH HÄLSA Redaktör: Anders Kjellberg Redaktionskommitté: Anders Colmsjö och Ewa Wigaeus Hjelm © Arbetslivsinstitutet & författarna 1998 Arbetslivsinstitutet, 171 84 Solna, Sverige ISBN 91–7045–460–4 ISSN 0346-7821 Tryckt hos CM Gruppen Preface The Nordic Council is an intergovernmental collaborative body for the five countries, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. One of the committees, the Nordic Senior Executive Committee for Occupational Environmental Matters, initiated a project in order to produce criteria documents to be used by the regulatory authorities in the Nordic countries as a scientific basis for the setting of national occupational exposure limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Song and Plumage Evolution in the New World Orioles (Icterus) Show Similar Lability and Convergence in Patterns
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00082.x SONG AND PLUMAGE EVOLUTION IN THE NEW WORLD ORIOLES (ICTERUS) SHOW SIMILAR LABILITY AND CONVERGENCE IN PATTERNS J. Jordan Price,1,2 Nicholas R. Friedman,1,3 and Kevin E. Omland4,5 1Department of Biology, St. Mary’s College of Maryland, St. Mary’s City, Maryland 20686 2E-mail: [email protected] 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland 21250 5E-mail: [email protected] Received August 28, 2006 Accepted November 23, 2006 Both song and color patterns in birds are thought to evolve rapidly and exhibit high levels of homoplasy, yet few previous studies have compared the evolution of these traits systematically using the same taxa. Here we reconstruct the evolution of song in the New World orioles (Icterus) and compare patterns of vocal evolution to previously reconstructed patterns of change in plumage evolution in this clade. Individual vocal characters exhibit high levels of homoplasy, reflected in a low overall consistency index (CI = 0.27) and retention index (RI = 0.35). Levels of lability in song are comparable to those found for oriole plumage patterns using the same taxa (CI = 0.31, RI = 0.63), but are strikingly dissimilar to the conservative patterns of change seen in the songs of oropendolas (Psarocolius, Ocyalus;CI= 0.82, RI = 0.87), a group closely related to the orioles. Oriole song is also similar to oriole plumage in exhibiting repeated convergence in overall patterns, with some distantly related taxa sounding remarkably similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Sphingidae:) of the Caatinga of Northeast Brazil: a Case Study in the State of Rio Grande Do Norte
    212212 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 59(4), 2005, 212–218 THE HIGHLY SEASONAL HAWKMOTH FAUNA (LEPIDOPTERA SPHINGIDAE:) OF THE CAATINGA OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL: A CASE STUDY IN THE STATE OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE JOSÉ ARAÚJO DUARTE JÚNIOR Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 58059-900, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] AND CLEMENS SCHLINDWEIN Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. E-mail:[email protected] ABSTRACT: The caatinga, a thorn-shrub succulent savannah, is located in Northeastern Brazil and characterized by a short and irregular rainy season and a severe dry season. Insects are only abundant during the rainy months, displaying a strong seasonal pat- tern. Here we present data from a yearlong Sphingidae survey undertaken in the reserve Estação Ecológica do Seridó, located in the state of Rio Grande do Norte. Hawkmoths were collected once a month during two subsequent new moon nights, between 18.00h and 05.00h, attracted with a 160-watt mercury vapor light. A total of 593 specimens belonging to 20 species and 14 genera were col- lected. Neogene dynaeus, Callionima grisescens, and Hyles euphorbiarum were the most abundant species, together comprising up to 82.2% of the total number of specimens collected. These frequent species are residents of the caatinga of Rio Grande do Norte. The rare Sphingidae in this study, Pseudosphinx tetrio, Isognathus australis, and Cocytius antaeus, are migratory species for the caatinga.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Studies of the Biodiversity in Garay Cue
    ISSN 2313-0504 1(11)2014 PARAGUAY BIODIVERSITY PARAGUAY BIODIVERSITÄT Lasionota dispar (Kerremans, 1903) foto: U. Drechsel Asunción, Agosto 2014 Paraguay Biodiversidad 1(11) 51-60 Asunción, Agosto 2014 Preliminary studies of the Biodiversity in Garay Cue “Reserva Natural Privada Cerrados del Tagatiya” Ulf Drechsel* Abstract: Impressions during four short visits in recent years in the "Reserva Natural Privada Cerrados del Tagatiya " in the Estancia Garay Cué are represented by photographic documentation. Resumen: Impresiones durante cuatro visitas cortas en los últimos años en la " Reserva Natural Privada Cerrados del Tagatiya " en la Estancia Garay Cué están representados por una documentación fotográfica. Zusammenfassung: Eindruecke von vier Kurzbesuchen in den letzten Jahren in der “Reserva Natural Privada Cerrados del Tagatiya” in der Estancia Garay Cué werden durch fotographische Dokumentation dargestellt. Key words: Paraguay, Garay Cue, biodiversity In the northeast of the Department of Concepción in the eastern region of Paraguay is located the Estancia Garay Cué with an area of about 18,800 ha, of which form about 5,200 ha the " Reserva Natural Privada Cerrados del Tagatiya", a nature reserve under private management. The estancia is located between two national parks, the "Parque Nacional Paso Bravo" in the Northeast and the "Parque Nacional Serrania de San Luis" in the West and include semi-deciduous forests, gallery forests and various types of Cerrado. During four short visits from December 2012 to June 2013 could be obtained first impressions of the existing biodiversity and photos of plants and animals were made. Special attention was paid to the most neglected invertebrate fauna, as this is the main part of biodiversity with thousands of species, many of them still unknown to science.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Brevard County, Florida, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Worth Lagoon
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ...................................... 1 Park Significance .............................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN ................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 7 Management Authority and Responsibility ............................................ 7 Park Management Goals .................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................. 8 Public Participation ........................................................................... 9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 15 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ................................... 15 Natural Resources .......................................................................... 16 Topography ............................................................................... 20 Geology .................................................................................... 21 Soils ......................................................................................... 21 Minerals ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]