Completed Projects / Projets Terminés
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Model Domene Kmetijskega Informacijskega Sistema, Utemeljenega Na Standardih | Domain Model of an Agricultural Information System Based on Standards | 51-67 | | 51 |
G 2018 V GEODETSKI VESTNIK | letn. / Vol. 62 | št. / No. 1 | | 62/1 | MODEL DOMENE DOMAIN MODEL Of KMETIJSKEGA AN agricultural INfORMACIJSKEGA INfORMATION system SISTEMA, utemeljenega BASED ON standards NA standardih RECENZIRANI ČLANKI | PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES Nikola Janković, Miro Govedarica, Gerhard Navratil, Paolo Fogliaroni UDK: 006:631:659.2:91 DOI: 10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2018.01.51-67 Klasifikacija prispevka po COBISS.SI: 1.02 REVIEW ARTICLE Prispelo: 7. 7. 2017 Received: 7. 7. 2017 Sprejeto: 3. 1. 2018 Accepted: 3. 1. 2018 EN IZVLEČEK ABSTRACT SI | Za boljše upravljanje podatkov v kmetijstvu so vladne službe To better manage data in agriculture, governmental razvile geoinformacijske sisteme. Ti sistemi, ki praviloma services implement geoinformation systems. These systems temeljijo na sodobnih tehnologijah in standardih, se lahko may be used as an aid to calculation of subsidies, serve as uporabljajo predvsem kot pomoč pri določevanju kmetijskih means of control and as support in decision making while podpor, pri njihovem nadzoru ter kot podpora odločanju pri following the latest technologies and standards. One of the uresničevanju drugih nalog javnega sektorja. V okviru ene oldest policies of the EU, the Common Agricultural Policy, najstarejših politik Evropske unije, to je skupne kmetijske implements a system for agricultural subsidies along with politike, se je razvil sistem kmetijskih subvencij, z njim an information system to aid in enforcing it. This paper pa tudi sistem, ki pomeni pomembno podporo sistemu provides one design for an exhaustive geoinformation system kmetijskih subvencij. V članku predstavljamo razvoj in the Republic of Serbia and verification of the mentioned obširnega geoinformacijskega sistema Republike Srbije ter system with test data. -
(L3) - Audio/Picture Coding
Committee: (L3) - Audio/Picture Coding National Designation Title (Click here to purchase standards) ISO/IEC Document L3 INCITS/ISO/IEC 9281-1:1990:[R2013] Information technology - Picture Coding Methods - Part 1: Identification IS 9281-1:1990 INCITS/ISO/IEC 9281-2:1990:[R2013] Information technology - Picture Coding Methods - Part 2: Procedure for Registration IS 9281-2:1990 INCITS/ISO/IEC 9282-1:1988:[R2013] Information technology - Coded Representation of Computer Graphics Images - Part IS 9282-1:1988 1: Encoding principles for picture representation in a 7-bit or 8-bit environment :[] Information technology - Coding of Multimedia and Hypermedia Information - Part 7: IS 13522-7:2001 Interoperability and conformance testing for ISO/IEC 13522-5 (MHEG-7) :[] Information technology - Coding of Multimedia and Hypermedia Information - Part 5: IS 13522-5:1997 Support for Base-Level Interactive Applications (MHEG-5) :[] Information technology - Coding of Multimedia and Hypermedia Information - Part 3: IS 13522-3:1997 MHEG script interchange representation (MHEG-3) :[] Information technology - Coding of Multimedia and Hypermedia Information - Part 6: IS 13522-6:1998 Support for enhanced interactive applications (MHEG-6) :[] Information technology - Coding of Multimedia and Hypermedia Information - Part 8: IS 13522-8:2001 XML notation for ISO/IEC 13522-5 (MHEG-8) Created: 11/16/2014 Page 1 of 44 Committee: (L3) - Audio/Picture Coding National Designation Title (Click here to purchase standards) ISO/IEC Document :[] Information technology - Coding -
INCITS Withdrawn Standards and Projects List - Prior to 2015
INCITS Withdrawn Standards and Projects List - Prior to 2015 Key: Designation: The final standard designation given to the published standard Project: The initial number assigned to new project prior to 2013. Title: Title of the standard Committee: The committee assignment for the project. Designation: -[] Project: 1058 Knowledge Information Format (KIF) Committee: INCITS/DM32.8 Designation: -[] Project: 1059 Conceptual Graphs: A presentation language for knowledge in conceptual models Committee: INCITS/DM32.8 Designation: -[] Project: 106 USA Candidates for Registry Committee: INCITS/L2 Designation: -[] Project: 2113 Cartridge Characterization Standard - Part 4: Ink Cartridge Attributes Committee: INCITS/W1 Designation: -[] Project: 2113 Cartridge Characterization Standard - Part 5: Toner cartridge attributes Committee: INCITS/W1 Designation: -[] Project: 2086 Document Printing Application - Part 1: Abstract Service Definition and Procedures Committee: INCITS/T3 Designation: -[] Project: 2087 Application session service Committee: INCITS/T3 Designation: -[] Project: 1234 Information technology - Database languages - SQL - Part 4: Persistent Stored Modules (SQL/PSM) TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 Committee: INCITS/DM32.2 Designation: -[] Project: 1234 Information technology - Database languages - SQL - Part 1: Framework (SQL/Framework) TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 Committee: INCITS/DM32.2 Designation: -[] Project: 2061 Protocol Combinations to Provide and Support the OSI Network Service (Technical Report Type 3) Committee: INCITS/T3 Designation: -
JPEG and JPEG 2000
JPEG and JPEG 2000 Past, present, and future Richard Clark Elysium Ltd, Crowborough, UK [email protected] Planned presentation Brief introduction JPEG – 25 years of standards… Shortfalls and issues Why JPEG 2000? JPEG 2000 – imaging architecture JPEG 2000 – what it is (should be!) Current activities New and continuing work… +44 1892 667411 - [email protected] Introductions Richard Clark – Working in technical standardisation since early 70’s – Fax, email, character coding (8859-1 is basis of HTML), image coding, multimedia – Elysium, set up in ’91 as SME innovator on the Web – Currently looks after JPEG web site, historical archive, some PR, some standards as editor (extensions to JPEG, JPEG-LS, MIME type RFC and software reference for JPEG 2000), HD Photo in JPEG, and the UK MPEG and JPEG committees – Plus some work that is actually funded……. +44 1892 667411 - [email protected] Elysium in Europe ACTS project – SPEAR – advanced JPEG tools ESPRIT project – Eurostill – consensus building on JPEG 2000 IST – Migrator 2000 – tool migration and feature exploitation of JPEG 2000 – 2KAN – JPEG 2000 advanced networking Plus some other involvement through CEN in cultural heritage and medical imaging, Interreg and others +44 1892 667411 - [email protected] 25 years of standards JPEG – Joint Photographic Experts Group, joint venture between ISO and CCITT (now ITU-T) Evolved from photo-videotex, character coding First meeting March 83 – JPEG proper started in July 86. 42nd meeting in Lausanne, next week… Attendance through national -
File Format Guidelines for Management and Long-Term Retention of Electronic Records
FILE FORMAT GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT AND LONG-TERM RETENTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS 9/10/2012 State Archives of North Carolina File Format Guidelines for Management and Long-Term Retention of Electronic records Table of Contents 1. GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 3 2. DESCRIPTION OF FORMATS RECOMMENDED FOR LONG-TERM RETENTION ......................... 7 2.1 Word Processing Documents ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 PDF/A-1a (.pdf) (ISO 19005-1 compliant PDF/A) ........................................................................ 7 2.1.2 OpenDocument Text (.odt) ................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Special Note on Google Docs™ .......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Plain Text Documents ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Plain Text (.txt) US-ASCII or UTF-8 encoding ................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Comma-separated file (.csv) US-ASCII or UTF-8 encoding ........................................................... 7 2.2.3 Tab-delimited file (.txt) US-ASCII or UTF-8 encoding .................................................................... 8 2.3 -
Section 8A: Technical Specifications Table
SECTION 8A: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION NUMBER TITLE DIVISION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01001 Standard Drawings, Standard Specifications and Approved Materials List 01002 Contractor’s Insurance Certification and Pollution Liability Insurance 01005 Coordination with Design Engineer and Agency 01010 Summary of Work 01025 Measurement and Payment 01039 Coordination and Meetings 01043 Coordination with Agency’s Operations 01047 Connections to Existing Facilities 01060 Permits and Other Regulatory Requirements 01090 Reference Standards 01170 Special Technical Provisions 01300 Record Drawings and Submittals 01310 Construction Progress Schedules 01370 Schedule of Values 01380 Pre-Construction Video Recording and Photographs 01400 Quality Control 01410 Testing Laboratory Services 01500 Construction Facilities and Temporary Controls 01545 Protection of Work and Property 01570 Traffic Regulations 01600 Materials and Equipment 01630 Product Options and Substitutions 01700 Project Closeout 01710 Clean-up 01734 Operating and Maintenance Information 01760 Spare Parts and Maintenance Materials DIVISION 2 SITEWORK 02010 Subsurface Investigation 02050 Demolition and Removal 02055 Removal and Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 02130 Removal and Resurfacing of Pavement 02160 Excavation Support Systems 02200 Earthwork CITY OF OCEANSIDE TOC - 1 HENIE HILLS & J.P. STEIGER RESERVOIR REPAIRS SPECIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 908754600712 October 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION NUMBER TITLE 02205 Existing Utilities 02222 -
ITC Confplanner DVD Pages Itcconfplanner
Comparative Analysis of H.264 and Motion- JPEG2000 Compression for Video Telemetry Item Type text; Proceedings Authors Hallamasek, Kurt; Hallamasek, Karen; Schwagler, Brad; Oxley, Les Publisher International Foundation for Telemetering Journal International Telemetering Conference Proceedings Rights Copyright © held by the author; distribution rights International Foundation for Telemetering Download date 25/09/2021 09:57:28 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/581732 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF H.264 AND MOTION-JPEG2000 COMPRESSION FOR VIDEO TELEMETRY Kurt Hallamasek, Karen Hallamasek, Brad Schwagler, Les Oxley [email protected] Ampex Data Systems Corporation Redwood City, CA USA ABSTRACT The H.264/AVC standard, popular in commercial video recording and distribution, has also been widely adopted for high-definition video compression in Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance and for Flight Test applications. H.264/AVC is the most modern and bandwidth-efficient compression algorithm specified for video recording in the Digital Recording IRIG Standard 106-11, Chapter 10. This bandwidth efficiency is largely derived from the inter-frame compression component of the standard. Motion JPEG-2000 compression is often considered for cockpit display recording, due to the concern that details in the symbols and graphics suffer excessively from artifacts of inter-frame compression and that critical information might be lost. In this paper, we report on a quantitative comparison of H.264/AVC and Motion JPEG-2000 encoding for HD video telemetry. Actual encoder implementations in video recorder products are used for the comparison. INTRODUCTION The phenomenal advances in video compression over the last two decades have made it possible to compress the bit rate of a video stream of imagery acquired at 24-bits per pixel (8-bits for each of the red, green and blue components) with a rate of a fraction of a bit per pixel. -
List of EPFL Recommended File Formats
List of EPFL Recommended File Formats Type of Data Sub Type Recommended File Formats for Sharing, Reuse and Long-Term Preservation Acceptable Formats (up to 10 year) Not Suitable for Preservation Dataset Tabular data with extensive metadata comma-separated values (CSV) file unicode UTF-8 (.csv) with CSV on the Web descriptive metadata plain text data, ASCII (.txt) Hierarchical Data Format version 5 HDF5 (.hdf5) Hypertext Mark-up Language (HTML) (.html) LaTeX (.tex) SPSS portable format (.por) Tabular data with minimal metadata comma-separated values (CSV) unicode UTF-8 file (.csv) eXtensible Mark-up Language (XML) text according to an appropriate MS Excel (xls, .xlsb) tab-delimited file (.tab) Document Type Definition (DTD) or schema (.xml) OpenDocument Spreadsheet (.ods) MS Excel (.xlsx) Structured Query Language (SQL) dump, preferably from an open tool (PostgreSQL, MariaDB) Text Textual data PDF/A (.pdf) widely-used proprietary formats, e.g. MS Word (.docx) PowerPoint (.pptx) MS Word (.doc) plain text, unicode UTF-8 (.txt) PDF with embedded forms PowerPoint (.ppt) Open Document Text (.odt, .odm) Rich Text Format (.rtf) LaTeX (.tex) Markdown (.md) HTML (.htm, .html), XHMTL 1.0 XML marked-up text (.xml), with specified schema Code Plain text formats (e.g. Matlab/Octave .m , R-project .R, Python .py , and so on) Text files for S-plus (.sdd) Matlab (.mat) Jupyter Notebook (.iypnb) Matlab .mat, should be saved in HDF format. R-project (.rdata) Rstudio (.rstudio), Rmarkdown (.rmd) NetCDF Multimedia Digital image data Raster : Raster : Vector -
Error-Resilient Video Coding Performance Analysis of Motion JPEG 2000 and MPEG-4
Error-Resilient Video Coding Performance Analysis of Motion JPEG 2000 and MPEG-4 Frederic Dufaux and Touradj Ebrahimi Signal Processing Institute Emitall S.A. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) Rue du Théâtre 5 CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland CH-1820 Montreux, Switzerland [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The new Motion JPEG 2000 standard is providing with some compelling features. It is based on an intra-frame wavelet coding, which makes it very well suited for wireless applications. Indeed, the state-of-the-art wavelet coding scheme achieves very high coding efficiency. In addition, Motion JPEG 2000 is very resilient to transmission errors as frames are coded independently (intra coding). Furthermore, it requires low complexity and introduces minimal coding delay. Finally, it supports very efficient scalability. In this paper, we analyze the performance of Motion JPEG 2000 in error- prone transmission. We compare it to the well-known MPEG-4 video coding scheme, in terms of coding efficiency, error resilience and complexity. We present experimental results which show that Motion JPEG 2000 outperforms MPEG-4 in the presence of transmission errors. 1. INTRODUCTION The Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) has recently produced a new standard for still image coding, referred to as JPEG 2000 [1]. JPEG 2000 not only provides with a state-of-the-art wavelet coding scheme outperforming previous techniques such as JPEG, but it also offers a number of features highly desired in multimedia applications. Among these features, we can mention progressive transmission by resolution or quality, lossy to lossless progressive compression, random code stream access and processing, continuous-tone and bi-level compression, and robustness to transmission errors. -
International Standard Iso/Iec 15444-12:2015(E)
INTERNATIONAL ISO/IEC STANDARD 15444-12 Fifth edition 2015‐12‐15 Information technology — JPEG 2000 image coding system — Part 12: ISO base media file format Technologies de l'information — Système de codage d'images JPEG 2000 — Partie 12: Format ISO de base pour les fichiers médias Reference number ISO/IEC 15444‐12:2015(E) © ISO/IEC 2015 COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO 2015, Published in Switzerland All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form orthe by requester. any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of ISO copyright office Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401 CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland Tel. +41 22 749 01 11 Faxwww.iso.org +41 22 749 09 47 [email protected] ISO/IEC 15444-12:2015(E) Contents Page 1 Scope .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Normative references .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3 Terms, definitions, and abbreviated terms .................................................................................................. 3 3.1 Terms and definitions ..................................................................................................................................... -
High Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K): Algorithm, Performance and Potential
High Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K): Algorithm, Performance and Potential Authors: David Taubman1,2, Aous Naman1,2, Reji Mathew1, Michael Smith3, Osamu Watanabe4 and Pierre-Anthony Lemieux5 Affiliations: 1. UNSW Sydney, Australia. 2. Kakadu R&D Pty. Ltd., Australia 3. Wavelet Consulting LLC, U.S.A. 4. Takushoku University, Japan 5. Sandflow Consulting LLC, U.S.A. Last updated: 29 May 2020 Forward This document is exPected to evolve over time to Provide as much information as possible to facilitate assessment and deployment of the flexible and efficient new High Throughput JPEG 2000 standard: ITU-T Rec T.814 | IS 15444-15. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. THROUGHPUT AND KEY FEATURES OF HTJ2K ........................................................................................... 4 1.2. QUALITY SCALABILITY IN HTJ2K ................................................................................................................. 4 1.3. RELEVANT STANDARDS .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4. ROYALTY STATUS OF HTJ2K ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.5. SOFTWARE TOOLS AND RESOURCES FOR HTJ2K ....................................................................................... 6 1.6. ORGANIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT -
An Overview of the JPEG 2000 Still Image Compression
Signal Processing: Image Communication 17 (2002) 3–48 An overview of the JPEG2000 still image compression standard Majid Rabbani*, Rajan Joshi Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY 14650, USA Abstract In 1996, the JPEGcommittee began to investigate possibilities for a new still image compression standard to serve current and future applications. This initiative, which was named JPEG2000, has resulted in a comprehensive standard (ISO 154447ITU-T Recommendation T.800) that is being issued in six parts. Part 1, in the same vein as the JPEG baseline system, is aimed at minimal complexity and maximal interchange and was issued as an International Standard at the end of 2000. Parts 2–6 define extensions to both the compression technology and the file format and are currently in various stages of development. In this paper, a technical description of Part 1 of the JPEG2000 standard is provided, and the rationale behind the selected technologies is explained. Although the JPEG2000 standard only specifies the decoder and the codesteam syntax, the discussion will span both encoder and decoder issues to provide a better understanding of the standard in various applications. r 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: JPEG2000; Image compression; Image coding; Wavelet compression 1. Introduction and background select various elements to satisfy particular re- quirements. This toolkit includes the following The Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) components: (i) the JPEGbaseline system, which committee was formed in 1986 under the joint is a simple and efficient discrete cosine transform auspices of ISO and ITU-T1 and was chartered (DCT)-based lossy compression algorithm that with the ‘‘digital compression and coding of uses Huffman coding, operates only in sequential continuous-tone still images’’.