Freedom in the World - Burma (Myanmar) (2011)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freedom in the World - Burma (Myanmar) (2011) http://www.freedomhouse.org/inc/content/pubs/fiw/inc_country_detail.cf... Print Freedom in the World - Burma (Myanmar) (2011) Capital: Rangoon Political Rights Score: 7 * (Note: Nay Pyi Taw Civil Liberties Score: 7 * serves as the Status: Not Free administrative capital) Overview Population: 50,020,000 In November 2010, the military junta oversaw Burma’s first parliamentary elections since 1990, thoroughly rigging the process to ensure a sweeping victory for the pro-military Union Solidarity and Development Party. The country’s main opposition party, the National League for Democracy, refused to contest elections it deemed undemocratic and was formally dissolved by the government in September. However, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the party’s longtime leader, was released in mid-November after years under house arrest. The authorities cancelled voting in several border areas populated by ethnic minorities, where the government has limited control and low-intensity civil conflict continued. Burma gained independence from Britain in 1948. The military has ruled the country since 1962, when General Ne Win led a coup that toppled an elected civilian government. The ruling Revolutionary Council consolidated all legislative, executive, and judicial power and pursued radical socialist and isolationist policies. Burma, once one of the wealthiest countries in Southeast Asia, eventually became one of the most impoverished in the region. The present junta, led by General Than Shwe, dramatically asserted its power in 1988, when the army opened fire on peaceful, student-led, prodemocracy protesters, killing an estimated 3,000 people. In the aftermath, a younger generation of army commanders created the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) to rule the country. The SLORC refused to cede power in 1990 after the National League for Democracy (NLD) won 392 of the 485 parliamentary seats in Burma’s first free elections in three decades. Instead the junta nullified the results and jailed dozens of NLD members, including party leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, who spent most of the next two decades in detention. Aung San Suu Kyi was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991 for her nonviolent struggle for democracy and human rights. The SLORC refashioned itself into the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) in 1997. In late 2000, the government began holding talks with Aung San Suu Kyi, leading to an easing of restrictions on the NLD by mid-2002. However, the party’s revitalization apparently rattled hard-liners within the regime during the first half of 2003. On May 30 of that year, scores of NLD leaders and supporters were killed when SPDC thugs ambushed an NLD motorcade. Arrests and detentions of political activists, journalists, and students followed the attack. The largest demonstrations in nearly 20 years broke out in cities across the country in August and September 2007, triggered by a 500 percent fuel-price increase. The 88 Generation Students, a group composed of dissidents active in the 1988 protests, were at the forefront of many of the demonstrations. The protest movement expanded to include thousands of Buddhist monks and nuns, who were encouraged by the general populace. Soldiers, riot police, and members of the paramilitary Union Solidarity and Development Association (USDA) and the Swan Arr Shin militia group responded brutally, killing at least 31 people. The crackdown targeted important religious sites and included the public beating, shooting, and arrest of monks, further delegitimizing the regime in the eyes of many Burmese. 1 of 5 5/17/2011 9:53 AM http://www.freedomhouse.org/inc/content/pubs/fiw/inc_country_detail.cf... Cyclone Nargis struck the Irrawaddy Delta on May 2, 2008, causing over 150,000 deaths and severely affecting another 2.4 million people. The SPDC initially attempted to control all foreign and domestic relief efforts, effectively blocking much of the desperately needed aid. In the absence of a government response, local Burmese civil society actors stepped in, and monasteries became distribution points and shelters for survivors. Many Burmese volunteers were detained for trying to deliver aid to cyclone victims, including the popular comedian Zarganar, who was sentenced to 59 years in prison in November 2008. Despite the severity of the cyclone, the SPDC pushed through a constitutional referendum on May 10, 2008. Burmese political opposition and international human rights groups denounced the new charter, which was approved by an implausibly high margin and would ensure military control of the political system even after elections scheduled for 2010. In an apparent bid to remove potential obstacles prior to the voting, the authorities continued to arrest and imprison dissidents throughout 2009. More than 300 activists, ranging from political and labor figures to artists and bloggers, received harsh sentences after closed trials, with some prison terms exceeding 100 years. In March 2010, the SPDC established a hand-picked election commission and announced a series of electoral laws. The USDA, which was ostensibly the regime’s mass-based social welfare organization but regularly served as its thuggish political enforcement arm, transformed itself into the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) to contest the elections. In April, Prime Minister Thein Sein and over 20 other top military officials shed their uniforms and registered as civilian candidates with the new party. The USDP ultimately fielded over 1,000 candidates, more than double the candidates of any other party, and ran unopposed in several constituencies. Another progovernment party, the National Unity Party (NUP), fielded 488 candidates for the national legislature alone. Meanwhile, opposition parties struggled to coordinate their activities and meet tight electoral deadlines, registration fees for candidates, and membership minimums. In a controversial decision, the NLD chose not to reregister to contest the elections, citing the unjust electoral laws. Though the government formally dissolved the party in September, it remained politically active, educating citizens about their right not to vote. A breakaway faction led by Than Nyein, the National Democratic Force (NDF), opted to participate in the balloting but managed to run only 142 candidates. The Shan National Democratic Party, one of the largest of several ethnic-based political parties, contested about 60 seats. During the campaign, a number of prodemocracy parties complained of intimidation by security forces. The authorities also banned foreign media coverage and independent monitoring of the November 7 elections, and reports of vote-buying and voter intimidation were widespread. There were serious allegations of voting irregularities on election day, including complaints of military commanders casting ballots on behalf of their subordinates and the appropriation of “advance voting” ballots by the USDP; though parties may contest the results, the fees for lodging a complaint with the election commission are exorbitant. The USDP enjoyed an overwhelming victory with 76.8 percent of the vote, capturing 129 of the 168 elected seats in the Nationalities Assembly and 259 of the 330 elected seats in the People’s Assembly. The USDP also secured 75 percent of the seats in the 14 state and regional assemblies. The NUP won only 3 percent of the seats, and prodemocracy parties captured just a handful of seats, including the NDF’s four seats in the Nationalities Assembly and eight in the People’s Assembly. The Rakhine Nationalities Development Party and the Shan National Democracy Party earned the second highest percentage of seats in the Nationalities Assembly and People’s Assembly, respectively. However, the vote for ethnic minority parties would likely have been higher had voting not been cancelled in several ethnic minority-dominated areas. Reports of voter turnout varied from 35 to 60 percent, though the official count was 70 percent. The SPDC was scheduled to remain in power until the new parliament convened within 90 days of the elections. Just six days after the elections, Aung San Suu Kyi was released from house arrest. Her first public appearance, where she stressed national reconciliation and promised to work with all prodemocracy parties, drew thousands of supporters. 2 of 5 5/17/2011 9:53 AM http://www.freedomhouse.org/inc/content/pubs/fiw/inc_country_detail.cf... Also in 2010, the government continued a parallel effort to consolidate its control over the country by incorporating armed ethnic minority groups—with which it had established ceasefire agreements—into a government-led Border Guard Force. Ethnic armies attacked Burmese forces along the Thai border late in the year, forcing over 20,000 Burmese to flee over the border for safety. Political Rights and Civil Liberties Burma is not an electoral democracy. The military junta has long ruled by decree and controlled all executive, legislative, and judicial powers; suppressed nearly all basic rights; and committed human rights abuses with impunity. The junta carefully rigged the electoral framework surrounding the 2010 national elections, which were neither free nor fair. The process of drafting the 2008 constitution, which the elections put into effect, had proceeded intermittently for 15 years, was closely controlled by the military, and excluded key stakeholders. Although the charter establishes a parliament and a civilian president, it also entrenches military dominance, and allows the military to dissolve the civilian
Recommended publications
  • I. Armed Conflict in Kachin State
    HUMAN RIGHTS “UNTOLD MISERIES” Wartime Abuses and Forced Displacement in Kachin State WATCH “Untold Miseries” Wartime Abuses and Forced Displacement in Burma’s Kachin State Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-874-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org MARCH 2012 1-56432-874-0 “Untold Miseries” Wartime Abuses and Forced Displacement in Burma’s Kachin State Map of Burma ...................................................................................................................... i Detailed Map of Kachin State .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REGLUGERÐ Um Þvingunaraðgerðir Varðandi Mjanmar (Búrma)
    Nr. 911 26. október 2009 REGLUGERÐ um þvingunaraðgerðir varðandi Mjanmar (Búrma). 1. gr. Almenn ákvæði. Með reglugerð þessari eru sett ákvæði um þvingunaraðgerðir varðandi Mjanmar sem íslensk stjórnvöld hafa ákveðið að framfylgja á grundvelli yfirlýsingar ríkisstjórna aðildarríkja Evrópu- sambandsins og Fríverslunarsamtaka Evrópu um pólitísk skoðanaskipti, sem er hluti samningsins um Evrópska efnahagssvæðið, sbr. lög nr. 2/1993. Þvingunaraðgerðir Evrópusambandsins varðandi Mjanmar byggja á sameiginlegri afstöðu ráðs Evrópusambandsins 2006/318/CFSP frá 27. apríl 2006 ásamt síðari breytingum, uppfærslum og viðbótum: sameiginleg afstaða 2007/750/CFSP, 2008/349/CFSP, 2009/351/CFSP og 2009/615/CFSP. Gerðir Evrópusambandsins, þ.m.t. uppfærðir listar yfir aðila og hluti sem þvingunaraðgerðir beinast að eða varða, eftir því sem við á, eru birtar á vefsetri þess (http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/cfsp/sanctions/index_en.htm). Ákvæði reglugerðar nr. 119/2009 um framkvæmd alþjóðlegra þvingunaraðgerða skulu gilda um framkvæmd reglugerðar þessarar. 2. gr. Vopnasölubann. Vopnasölubann skal gilda gagnvart Mjanmar, sbr. 1. og 2. gr. 2006/318/CFSP og síðari breyt- ingar, uppfærslur og viðbætur. 3. gr. Viðskiptabann. Bannað er að selja, útvega, yfirfæra eða flytja út búnað eða tækni til fyrirtækja í Mjanmar sem stunda eftirgreindan iðnað ef sá búnaður eða tækni tengist starfsemi þeirra: a) skógarhögg og timburvinnslu, b) námuvinnslu gulls, tins, járns, kopars, volframs, silfurs, kola, blýs, mangans, nikkels og sinks, c) námuvinnslu og vinnslu eðal- eða hálfeðalsteina, þ.m.t. demanta, rúbínsteina, saffíra, jaði- steina og smaragða. Bannað er að kaupa, flytja inn eða flytja til landsins eftirgreindar vörur frá Mjanmar: a) trjáboli, timbur og timburvörur, b) gull, tin, járn, kopar, volfram, silfur, kol, blý, mangan, nikkel og sink, c) eðal- eða hálfeðalsteina, þ.m.t.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006
    Burma Page 1 of 24 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Burma Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Since 1962, Burma, with an estimated population of more than 52 million, has been ruled by a succession of highly authoritarian military regimes dominated by the majority Burman ethnic group. The current controlling military regime, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), led by Senior General Than Shwe, is the country's de facto government, with subordinate Peace and Development Councils ruling by decree at the division, state, city, township, ward, and village levels. In 1990 prodemocracy parties won more than 80 percent of the seats in a generally free and fair parliamentary election, but the junta refused to recognize the results. Twice during the year, the SPDC convened the National Convention (NC) as part of its purported "Seven-Step Road Map to Democracy." The NC, designed to produce a new constitution, excluded the largest opposition parties and did not allow free debate. The military government totally controlled the country's armed forces, excluding a few active insurgent groups. The government's human rights record worsened during the year, and the government continued to commit numerous serious abuses. The following human rights abuses were reported: abridgement of the right to change the government extrajudicial killings, including custodial deaths disappearances rape, torture, and beatings of
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar
    Myanmar Development Research (MDR) (Present) Enlightened Myanmar Research (EMR) Wing (3), Room (A-305) Thitsar Garden Housing. 3 Street , 8 Quarter. South Okkalarpa Township. Yangon, Myanmar +951 562439 Acknowledgement of Myanmar Development Research This edition of the “Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar (2010-2012)” is the first published collection of facts and information of political parties which legally registered at the Union Election Commission since the pre-election period of Myanmar’s milestone 2010 election and the post-election period of the 2012 by-elections. This publication is also an important milestone for Myanmar Development Research (MDR) as it is the organization’s first project that was conducted directly in response to the needs of civil society and different stakeholders who have been putting efforts in the process of the political transition of Myanmar towards a peaceful and developed democratic society. We would like to thank our supporters who made this project possible and those who worked hard from the beginning to the end of publication and launching ceremony. In particular: (1) Heinrich B�ll Stiftung (Southeast Asia) for their support of the project and for providing funding to publish “Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar (2010-2012)”. (2) Party leaders, the elected MPs, record keepers of the 56 parties in this book who lent their valuable time to contribute to the project, given the limited time frame and other challenges such as technical and communication problems. (3) The Chairperson of the Union Election Commission and all the members of the Commission for their advice and contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 20 August 2001
    United Nations A/56/312 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 August 2001 Original: English Fifty-sixth session Item 131 (c) of the provisional agenda* Human rights questions: human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives Situation of human rights in Myanmar Note by the Secretary-General** The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly, the interim report prepared by Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, in accordance with Commission resolution 2001/15 and Economic and Social Council decision 2001/251. * A/56/150. ** In accordance with General Assembly resolution 54/248, sect. C, para. 1, this report is being submitted on 20 August 2001 so as to include as much updated information as possible. 01-51752 (E) 260901 *0151752* A/56/312 Interim report of the Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Myanmar Summary The present report is the first report of the present Special Rapporteur, appointed to this mandate on 28 December 2000. The report refers to his activities and developments relating to the situation of human rights in Myanmar between 1 January and 14 August 2001. In view of the brevity and exploratory nature of the Special Rapporteur’s initial visit to Myanmar in April and pending a proper fact-finding mission to take place at the end of September 2001, this report addresses only a limited number of areas. In the Special Rapporteur’s assessment as presented in this report, political transition in Myanmar is a work in progress and, as in many countries, to move ahead incrementally will be a complex process.
    [Show full text]
  • Euro-Burma Office 11 January 2010 to 15 January 2010 Election Monitor
    Euro-Burma Office 11 January 2010 to 15 January 2010 Election Monitor ELECTION MONITOR NO. 14 AUNG SAN SUU KYI MEETS JUNTA’S LIAISON MINISTER A meeting between detained pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and Government Liaison Officer, U Aung Kyi, took place for the first time in 2010 at the State Guest House on 15 January, according to National League for Democracy (NLD) senior officials. The meeting comes a day after the NLD announced its decision to expand its present Central Executive Committee from 11 to 20 members. NLD CEC members Ohn Kyaing and Khin Maung Swe confirmed that the meeting had taken place but were not able to provide the details of the discussions. The meeting lasted for about 25 minutes. The NLD has welcomed the latest meeting between Aung San Suu Kyi and Aung Kyi as a good step and expressed its desire for the process to continue but remains undecided on the party’s participation in the elections. 1 NLD RESTRUCTURES TOP DECISION-MAKING BODY In a statement on Thursday, 14 January, the NLD announced the addition of nine new members to its Central Executive Committee (CEC) to allow younger members and new blood to be introduced within the party’s principle policy organ. They include Dr. May Win Myint of Mayangon Township and Dr. Than Nyein, one of the founding members of NLD and brother-in-law of former Military Intelligence Chief and purged Prime Minister, Khin Nyunt. Other newly appointed CEC members include, Win Myint, member of NLD’s Legal Committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Monitor No.40
    Euro-Burma Office 4 to 10 September 2010 Election Monitor ELECTION MONITOR NO. 40 SHAN STATE, PA-O SELF-ADMINISTERED ZONE ELECTORAL SUB-COMMISSIONS MEET A meeting between the Shan State Electoral Sub-commission and the Pa-O Self-Administered Zone Sub- commission was held at the meeting hall of Hopong Township Sub-commission on 27 August. The chairman of Shan State Sub-commission, U Pwint, addressed the meeting and sub-commission members. Township Law Officer, U Maung Maung, and Deputy Director of the Information and Public Relations Department, Daw May May Ni, explained the election laws, rules and the electoral process. U Thet Tun, the chairman of Pa-O Self- Administered Zone Sub-commission, discussed the electoral work this is to be jointly carried out by the Hopong, Hsihseng and Pinlaung Townships. U Than Win, the chairman of Hopong Township Sub-commission, also discussed conducting electoral training courses and issues related to the preparation of sites to be designated as polling stations with sub-commission members.1 ELECTORAL PROCESS COURSES OPENED IN MAUBIN TOWNSHIP On 2 September, a training course on the electoral process organized by the Maubin Township Election Sub- commission in Maubin District, Ayeyawady Region for returning officers, deputy returning officers and members of polling stations was opened at the Aungheit village-tract. Those present included Members of Maubin District Sub-commission Daw Ngwe Khin and U Myo Myint as well as trainees. Township election sub- commission members U Thaung Nyunt, U Htein Lin and U Myint Soe briefed those present on electoral laws and by-laws and gave lectures on the electoral process for returning officers and deputy returning officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Regulation (EC) No 747/2009 of 14 August
    L 212/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.8.2009 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 747/2009 of 14 August 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, (4) In order to ensure that the measures provided for in this Regulation are effective, this Regulation should enter into force immediately, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 of Article 1 25 February 2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar and repealing Regu­ 1. Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 is hereby lation (EC) No 817/2006 ( 1) and in particular Article 18(1)(b), replaced by the text of Annex I to this Regulation. thereof, 2. Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 is hereby Whereas: replaced by the text of Annex II to this Regulation. Article 2 (1) Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its funds and economic resources under that Regulation. publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Article 3 (2) Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 lists enter­ prises owned or controlled by the Government of This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly Burma/Myanmar or its members or persons associated applicable in all Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON POSITION 2009/615/CFSP of 13 August 2009 Amending Common Position 2006/318/CFSP Renewing Restrictive Measures Against Burma/Myanmar
    L 210/38 EN Official Journal of the European Union 14.8.2009 III (Acts adopted under the EU Treaty) ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE V OF THE EU TREATY COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2009/615/CFSP of 13 August 2009 amending Common Position 2006/318/CFSP renewing restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, (5) Moreover, the Council considers it necessary to amend the lists of persons and entities subject to the restrictive Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in measures in order to extend the assets freeze to enter­ particular Article 15 thereof, prises that are owned or controlled by members of the regime in Burma/Myanmar or by persons or entities associated with them, Whereas: HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION: (1) On 27 April 2006, the Council adopted Common Article 1 Position 2006/318/CFSP renewing restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar ( 1). Annexes II and III to Common Position 2006/318/CFSP shall be replaced by the texts of Annexes I and II to this Common Position. (2) Council Common Position 2009/351/CFSP ( 2) of 27 April 2009 extended until 30 April 2010 the Article 2 restrictive measures imposed by Common Position 2006/318/CFSP. This Common Position shall take effect on the date of its adoption. (3) On 11 August 2009, the European Union condemned Article 3 the verdict against Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal announced that it will respond with additional targeted of the European Union. restrictive measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlevel Playing Field: Burma’S Election Landscape
    Burma Policy Briefing Nr 3 October 2010 Unlevel Playing Field: Burma’s Election Landscape On 7 November 2010, the people of Burma will go to the polls, the culmination of an Conclusions and Recommendations electoral process closely controlled by the military State Peace and Development • The elections will be Burma's most defin- Council. The opposition National League ing political moment for a generation. for Democracy (NLD) decided not to par- However the electoral process lacks ticipate and is encouraging a boycott by democratic and ethnic inclusion. Without voters, a tactic that may prove counter- such inclusion, the country's political productive as it will be mainly pro-demo- crises are likely to continue. cracy candidates who lose votes.1 For most • The electoral playing field is tilted in people, casting their ballot will be a novel favour of the regime’s USDP due to strict experience. No one under the age of 38, the regulations on registration, the cost of majority of the electorate, has ever partici- registering candidates, and the limited pated in an election. time for parties to organize. If voting is a new experience, the choice of • Even if the voting is fair, ‘establishment’ candidates on offer may be less so. In many parties, together with military appointees, constituencies, particularly for many re- are likely to control a majority of seats in gional legislative seats in the ethnic Bur- the new legislatures. 37 political parties man heartland, there are only two options: will participate in the elections. But most a candidate representing the current re- have small regional or ethnic support gime’s party, and a candidate representing bases.
    [Show full text]
  • 9-Monthly Chronology of Burma Political Prisoners for September
    Compiled by AAPP P.O Box 93, Mae Sot, Tak Province 63110, Thailand e.mail: [email protected] website: www.aappb.org ---------------------------------------------------------- Chronology of Political Prisoners in Burma for September 2008 There are a total of 2123 political prisoners in Burma, including 213 Monks, 16 MPs, 264 Students, 178 Women, 473 NLDs, 36 HRDPs, 219 Ethnics, 51 Former Political Prisoners, 22 Teachers, 41 Media Activists. 108 are considered in bad health in various prisons. After the Saffron Revolution, there were 1001 political prisoners, included 137 Monks, 117 Women, 257 Under Trial, 134 Imprisonment, and 43 in bad health in various prisons. As of 9002 detainees granted amnesty, total number bring 10 political prisoners. They are (1) U Win Tin, from Insein prison (2) U Khin Maung Swe from Lashio prison (3) Dr. Than Nyein from Prome prison (4) Dr. May Win Myint from Insein prison (5) Thein Naing from Mandalay prison (6) U Aye Thein (7) Thiha from Mongsat prison on September 23 (8) Maung Kyaw from Kale prison on September 26 (9) Aung Khin from Kale prison on September 26 (10) Myint Lwin from Kale prison on September 26. On 1 September 2008 (Monday) Nobel Laureate Aung San Su Kyi met with personal lawyer U Kyi Win at her Yangon home. "She says she is well, but she has lost some weight," Kyi Win told reporters. "She told me, 'I am a little tired and I need to rest'." (010908 AFP) 2 - Ashin Gambira, detained in Insein prison, appeared in Alon Township Court with 9 charges. (010908 DVB) 3 - Six NLD members including Daw Win Mya Mya appeared in Mandalay prison special court for the fourth time.
    [Show full text]
  • US DEPARTMENT of STATE Burma
    US DEPARTMENT OF STATE Burma: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2004 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 28, 2005 Since 1962, Burma has been ruled by a succession of highly authoritarian military regimes dominated by the majority Burman ethnic group. In 1990, pro-democracy parties won more than 80 percent of the seats during generally free and fair parliamentary elections, but the junta refused to recognize the results. The current controlling military junta, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), is the country’s de facto government, with subordinate Peace and Development Councils ruling by decree at the division, state, city, township, ward, and village levels. On October 19, hardliners further consolidated their power by ousting former Prime Minister Khin Nyunt and appointing Soe Win. From May through July, the SPDC reconvened a National Convention (NC) as part of its purported “Road Map to Democracy.” The NC excluded the largest opposition party and did not allow free debate. The judiciary was not independent and was subject to military control. The Government reinforced its rule with a pervasive security apparatus. Until its dismantling in October, the Office of Chief Military Intelligence (OCMI) exercised control through surveillance, harassment of political activists, intimidation, arrest, detention, physical abuse, and restrictions on citizens’ contacts with foreigners. After October, the Government’s new Military Affairs Security (MAS) assumed a similar role, though apparently with less sweeping powers. The Government justified its security measures as necessary to maintain order and national unity. Members of the security forces committed numerous serious human rights abuses.
    [Show full text]