Clonal Architecture of the Mouse Hippocampus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clonal Architecture of the Mouse Hippocampus The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1, 2002, 22(9):3520–3530 Clonal Architecture of the Mouse Hippocampus Loren A. Martin,1 Seong-Seng Tan,2 and Dan Goldowitz1 1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, and 2Howard Florey Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia Experimental mouse chimeras have proven useful in analyzing layer in a symmetrical manner. Clonally related populations of the cell lineages of various tissues. Here we use experimental GABAergic interneurons are dispersed throughout the hip- mouse chimeras to study cell lineage of the hippocampus. We pocampus and originate from progenitors that are separate examined clonal architecture and lineage relationships of the hip- from either pyramidal or granule cells. Granule and pyramidal pocampal pyramidal cells, dentate granule cells, and GABAergic cells, however, are closely linked in their lineages. Our quanti- interneurons. We quantitatively analyzed like-genotype cohorts of tative analyses yielded estimates of the size of the progenitor these neuronal populations in the hippocampus of the most pools that establish the pyramidal, granule, and GABAergic highly skewed chimeras to provide estimates of the size of the interneuronal populations as consisting of 7000, 400, and 40 progenitor pool that gives rise to these neuronal groups. We progenitors, respectively, for each side of the hippocampus. also compared the percentage chimerism across various brain Last, we found that the hippocampal pyramidal and granule structures to gain insights into the origins of the hippocampus cells share a lineage with cortical and diencephalic cells, point- relative to other neighboring regions of the brain. Our qualitative ing toward a common lineage that crosses the di-telencephalic analyses demonstrate that like-genotype cohorts of pyramidal boundaries. cells are aligned in radial arrays across the pyramidal cell layer, whereas like-genotype cohorts in the C-shaped dentate gyrus Key words: dentate gyrus; cell lineage; granule cell; pyramidal colonize either the outer shell or inner core of the granule cell cell; GABAergic interneuron; chimera At the junction where the dorsal telencephalon meets the dien- 1995, 1997; Morita et al., 1995; Pellegrini et al., 1996; Acampora et cephalon, the hippocampal rudiments form, eventually develop- al., 1997; Furuta et al., 1997; Porter et al., 1997; Suda et al., 1997; ing into the dentate gyrus and hippocampus proper (collectively Yoshida et al., 1997; Grove et al., 1998; Galceran et al., 1999, 2000; termed the hippocampus in this paper). The hippocampus has Grove and Tole, 1999; Theil et al., 1999; Zhao et al., 1999; Lee et been at the forefront of research in the neurosciences, with al., 2000; Liu et al., 2000; Tole et al., 2000a,b)]. This evolving numerous studies examining its development and how its simple molecular picture therefore suggests a unique set of genes defining structure subserves the complex functions of learning and mem- hippocampal development. ory. However, to our knowledge, the early origins of the hip- To elucidate the patterned development and lineal origins of pocampus have never been analyzed thoroughly. Cell lineage the hippocampus, and to complement the emerging molecular analysis is the principal means to explore the cellular dynamics organization, we used aggregation and blastocyst-injection chi- involved in the formation of a tissue. To date, lineage-based meras to retrospectively analyze like-genotype cohorts of the dissection of hippocampal development has been limited to one three major cell types in the adult mammalian hippocampus. We retroviral study showing that clonally related neurons can cross examined the underlying clonal architecture and lineage relation- cytoarchitectonic regions within the hippocampus proper (Grove ships of the pyramidal cells, granule cells, and GABAergic inter- et al., 1992). neurons of the hippocampus. We found that the hippocampus In recent years, molecular approaches to understanding mam- proper follows a radial clonal architecture, whereas the dentate malian forebrain development have begun to demonstrate dis- gyrus follows an outside-in neurogenetic gradient in its clonal tinct organizational patterns of gene expression and function organization. Furthermore, the two sides of the hippocampus throughout embryogenesis (for review, see Rubenstein et al., arise from distinct progenitor populations. We also demonstrate 1998). For the hippocampus, this has led to a growing number of that the GABAergic interneuronal population arises separately genes linked to hippocampal development [Gli3, BETA2/NeuroD, Tlx, and members of the gene families: BMP, LIM, EMX, OTX, from the principal hippocampal neurons, and their progenitors WNT, and LEF1/TCF (Boncinelli et al., 1993; Monaghan et al., contribute to the dentate gyrus and hippocampus proper alike. Quantitative analyses of like-genotype cells in the hippocampus provide upper estimates for the size of the progenitor pools of Received July 31, 2001; revised Jan. 18, 2002; accepted Jan. 28, 2002. each of the three major hippocampal cell types. Finally, observa- This research was supported by a University of Tennessee Health Science Center, tions of like-genotype cells across brain regions in several chime- Center for Neuroscience Predoctoral Fellowship (L.A.M.) and by a grant from Cure Autism Now. We thank Dr. Dave Airey for statistical advice, Richard Cushing for ras indicate that the hippocampus shares lineage with telence- technical support, and the anonymous reviewers for key comments and suggestions. phalic and diencephalic structures. These new insights into the Correspondence should be addressed to Dan Goldowitz, Department of Anatomy clonal architecture of the hippocampus form a developmental and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 855 Monroe Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163. E-mail: [email protected]. foundation for the emerging molecular events that are critical for Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/02/223520-11$15.00/0 understanding hippocampal development and function. Martin et al. • Cell Lineage Analysis of the Hippocampus J. Neurosci., May 1, 2002, 22(9):3520–3530 3521 MATERIALS AND METHODS Direct counts of all ␤-gal-positive neurons were made for the pyrami- dal, granule, and GABAergic neurons in serial sections. To determine Aggregation chimeras. Aggregation chimeras were made by a standard the percentage of labeled cells for the pyramidal and granule cell pop- method of fusing two four- to eight-cell embryos (Goldowitz et al., 1992). ulations, we calculated the total pyramidal and granule cell number for The original stocks of mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory each section by multiplying the area of each individual layer by its (Bar Harbor, ME) and maintained in our colony at the University of packing density (ϳ4 cells/1000 ␮m 2 for the pyramidal cell layer and 16 Tennessee Animal Care Facility. We used the B6;129S-Gtrosa26 cells/1000 ␮m 2 for the granule cell layer). Numerical estimates of hip- (ROSA26) transgenic mouse line to mark cells in chimeras, because this pocampal interneurons were obtained by direct counts of all GABAergic line has a constitutive expression of ␤-galactosidase (␤-gal) in CNS cells across a sampling of the hippocampus. The total number of hip- neurons that permits the analysis of cell lineage (Friedrich and Soriano, pocampal interneurons was estimated by multiplying the average number 1991; Goldowitz et al., 2000). The other component of chimeras came of GABAergic perikarya per section by the total number of sections from either hybrid 129/B6 or ICR mice. The use of two genetically through each hippocampus (ϳ200). This total number was then corrected distinct embryos in combination with the ROSA26 embryo to produce for perikarya that may have been counted twice using the Abercrombie chimeras provided added validity to our findings derived from the chi- correction factor (Abercrombie, 1946). meric combinations. Embryos were harvested from the oviducts of the Analysis of lineage relationships. To identify lineage relationships that donor mothers2dafter the appearance of a vaginal plug. The embryos may exist between the cell populations of the hippocampus and those of were then subjected to a light pronase treatment to remove the zonae other brain regions, the percentages of X-gal-labeled cells for the pyra- pellucidae and aggregated and cultured overnight (37°C, 5% CO )in 2 midal, granule, and GABAergic cells were compared with each other and drops of medium (Mullen and Whitten, 1971) covered with paraffin oil. to rough visual estimates of the percentage chimerism of the following The following afternoon, successfully fused embryos were transplanted brain regions: motor cortex; somatosensory cortex; piriform cortex; au- into the uterine horns of pseudopregnant ICR females. Avertin was ditory cortex; visual cortex; entorhinal, ectorhinal, and perirhinal corti- administered intraperitoneally as the general anesthetic for the ICR host ces; basal ganglia; globus pallidus; substantia nigra; subthalamic nucleus; females before transplantation. All surgical procedures and animal care amygdala; reticular nucleus; zona incerta; nucleus reunions; medial dor- were in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines for sal thalamus; lateral dorsal thalamus; ventral thalamus; habenula; lateral animal welfare and The Society for Neuroscience policy on the use of
Recommended publications
  • The Microscopical Structure of the Hippocampus in the Rat
    Bratisl Lek Listy 2008; 109 (3) 106 110 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY The microscopical structure of the hippocampus in the rat El Falougy H, Kubikova E, Benuska J Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia. [email protected] Abstract: The aim of this work was to study the rat’s hippocampal formation by applying the light microscopic methods. The histological methods used to explore this region of the rat’s brain were the Nissl technique, the Bielschowsky block impregnation method and the rapid Golgi technique. In the Nissl preparations, we identified only three fields of the hippocampus proprius (CA1, CA3 and CA4). CA2 was distinguished in the Bielschowsky impregnated blocks. The rapid Golgi technique, according the available literature, gives the best results by using the fresh samples. In this study, we reached good results by using formalin fixed sections. The layers of the hippocampal formation were differentiated. The pyramidal and granular cells were identified together with their axons and dendrites (Fig. 9, Ref. 22). Full Text (Free, PDF) www.bmj.sk. Key words: archicortex, hippocampal formation, light microscopy, rat. Abbreviations: CA1 regio I cornus ammonis; CA2 regio II in the lateral border of the hippocampus. It continues under the cornus ammonis; CA3 regio III cornus ammonis; CA4 regio corpus callosum as the fornix. Supracommissural hippocampus IV cornus ammonis. (the indusium griseum) extends over the corpus callosum to the anterior portion of the septum as thin strip of gray cortex (5, 6). The microscopical structure of the hippocampal formation The hippocampal formation is subdivided into regions and has been studied intensively since the time of Cajal (1911) and fields according the cell body location, cell body shape and size, his student Lorente de Nó (1934).
    [Show full text]
  • Slicer 3 Tutorial the SPL-PNL Brain Atlas
    Slicer 3 Tutorial The SPL-PNL Brain Atlas Ion-Florin Talos, M.D. Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital -1- http://www.slicer.org Acknowledgments NIH P41RR013218 (Neuroimage Analysis Center) NIH U54EB005149 (NA-MIC) Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital -2- http://www.slicer.org Disclaimer It is the responsibility of the user of 3DSlicer to comply with both the terms of the license and with the applicable laws, regulations and rules. Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital -3- http://www.slicer.org Material • Slicer 3 http://www.slicer.org/pages/Special:Slicer_Downloads/Release Atlas data set http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Slicer:Workshops:User_Training_101 • MRI • Labels • 3D-models Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital -4- http://www.slicer.org Learning Objectives • Loading the atlas data • Creating and displaying customized 3D-views of neuroanatomy Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital -5- http://www.slicer.org Prerequisites • Slicer Training Slicer 3 Training 1: Loading and Viewing Data http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Slicer:Workshops:User_Training_101 Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital -6- http://www.slicer.org Overview • Part 1: Loading the Brain Atlas Data • Part 2: Creating and Displaying Customized 3D views of neuroanatomy Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital -7- http://www.slicer.org Loading the Brain Atlas Data Slicer can load: • Anatomic grayscale data (CT, MRI) ……… ………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • HHS Public Access Author Manuscript
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptNeuroscience Author Manuscript. Author manuscript; Author Manuscript available in PMC 2015 April 26. Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2012 December 13; 226: 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.011. The Distribution of Phosphodiesterase 2a in the Rat Brain D. T. Stephensona,†, T. M. Coskranb, M. P. Kellya,‡, R. J. Kleimana,§, D. Mortonc, S. M. O'neilla, C. J. Schmidta, R. J. Weinbergd, and F. S. Mennitia,* D. T. Stephenson: [email protected]; M. P. Kelly: [email protected]; R. J. Kleiman: [email protected]; F. S. Menniti: [email protected] aNeuroscience Biology, Pfizer Global Research & Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA bInvestigative Pathology, Pfizer Global Research & Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA cToxologic Pathology, Pfizer Global Research & Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA dDepartment of Cell Biology & Physiology, Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA Abstract The phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are a superfamily of enzymes that regulate spatio-temporal signaling by the intracellular second messengers cAMP and cGMP. PDE2A is expressed at high levels in the mammalian brain. To advance our understanding of the role of this enzyme in regulation of neuronal signaling, we here describe the distribution of PDE2A in the rat brain. PDE2A mRNA was prominently expressed in glutamatergic pyramidal cells in cortex, and in pyramidal and dentate granule cells in the hippocampus. Protein concentrated in the axons and nerve terminals of these neurons; staining was markedly weaker in the cell bodies and proximal dendrites.
    [Show full text]
  • Certain Olfactory Centers of the Forebrain of the Giant Panda (Ailuropoda Melanoleuca)
    CERTAIN OLFACTORY CENTERS OF THE FOREBRAIN OF THE GIANT PANDA (AILUROPODA MELANOLEUCA) EDWARD W. LAUER Department of Anatomy, University of Michigan THIRTEEN FIGURE6 INTRODUCTION In the spring of 1946 the Laboratory of Comparative Neu- rology at the University of Michigan received from Professor Fred A. Mettler of Columbia University the brain of a giant panda ( Ailuropoda melanoleuca) for histological study. This had been obtained from a mature female melanoleuca, Pan Dee, presented to the New York Zoological Society in 1941 through United China Relief by Mme. Chiang Kai-shek and Mme. H. H. Kung, and which Bad died in the fall of 1945 from acute paralytic enteritis and peritonitis. A report on the topographical anatomy of the brain was made by Mettler and Goss ( '46) who concluded that externally it is identical with that of the bear. Unfortunately, practically no work has been done on the histological structure of the ursine brain making it impossible to compare its microscopic structure with that of the panda. The panda brain was fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 30 p. Alternate sections were stained in cresyl violet for cell study and in Weil for demonstration of fiber tracts. Another gross panda brain, also obtained from Pro- ' This investigation was aided by grants from the Horace H. Rackhsm School of Graduate Studies of the University of Michigan and from the A. B. Brower and E. R. Arn Medical Research and Scholarship Fund. 213 214 EDWARD W. LAUER fessor Mettler, was available for orientation. The photo- micrographs used for the illustrations were made with the assistance of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Theta Phase Precession Beyond the Hippocampus
    Theta phase precession beyond the hippocampus Authors: Sushant Malhotra1,2y, Robert W. A. Cross1y, Matthijs A. A. van der Meer1,3* 1Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 2Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo 3Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of Waterloo yThese authors contributed equally. *Correspondence should be addressed to MvdM, Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, 200 Uni- versity Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]. Running title: Phase precession beyond the hippocampus 1 Abstract The spike timing of spatially tuned cells throughout the rodent hippocampal formation displays a strikingly robust and precise organization. In individual place cells, spikes precess relative to the theta local field po- tential (6-10 Hz) as an animal traverses a place field. At the population level, theta cycles shape repeated, compressed place cell sequences that correspond to coherent paths. The theta phase precession phenomenon has not only afforded insights into how multiple processing elements in the hippocampal formation inter- act; it is also believed to facilitate hippocampal contributions to rapid learning, navigation, and lookahead. However, theta phase precession is not unique to the hippocampus, suggesting that insights derived from the hippocampal phase precession could elucidate processing in other structures. In this review we consider the implications of extrahippocampal phase precession in terms of mechanisms and functional relevance. We focus on phase precession in the ventral striatum, a prominent output structure of the hippocampus in which phase precession systematically appears in the firing of reward-anticipatory “ramp” neurons. We out- line how ventral striatal phase precession can advance our understanding of behaviors thought to depend on interactions between the hippocampus and the ventral striatum, such as conditioned place preference and context-dependent reinstatement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hippocampus Via Subiculum Upon Exposure to Desiccation
    Current Biology Magazine Where next for the study of Primer anhydrobiosis? Studies have largely Direct and relied on detecting gene upregulation The hippocampus via subiculum upon exposure to desiccation. CA1 This approach will fail to identify constitutively expresssed genes that James J. Knierim DG CA2 are important for anhydrobiotic survival but whose expression does not change The hippocampus is one of the most EC CA3 during desiccation and rehydration. thoroughly investigated structures in axons We still do not understand why some the brain. Ever since the 1957 report nematodes, for example, do not of the case study H.M., who famously survive desiccation, while others can lost the ability to form new, declarative Current Biology survive immediate exposure to extreme memories after surgical removal of the desiccation, and yet others require hippocampus and nearby temporal Figure 1. Coronal slice through the trans- verse axis of the hippocampus. preconditioning at a high relative lobe structures to treat intractable The black lines trace the classic ‘trisynaptic humidity. A comparative approach epilepsy, the hippocampus has been loop’. The red lines depict other important is likely to be informative, as has at the forefront of research into the pathways in the hippocampus, including the recently been published comparing neurobiological bases of memory. direct projections from entorhinal cortex (EC) to the genomes of P. vanderplanki and its This research led to the discovery all three CA fi elds, the feedback to the EC via desiccation-intolerant relative P. nubifer. in the hippocampus of long-term the subiculum, the recurrent collateral circuitry of CA3, and the feedback projection from CA3 potentiation, the pre-eminent model to DG.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphology of the Septum, Hippocampus, and Pallial Commissures in Repliles and Mammals' J
    THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE SEPTUM, HIPPOCAMPUS, AND PALLIAL COMMISSURES IN REPLILES AND MAMMALS' J. B. JOHNSTON Institute of Anatomy, University of Minnesota NINETY-THBEE X'IGURES In the mammalian brain the hippocampus extends from the base of the olfactory peduncle over the corpus callosum and bends down into the temporal lobe. Over the corpus callosug there is a well developed hippocampus in monotremes and mar- supials, whife in higher mammals it is reduced to a sIender ves- tige consisting of the stria longitudinalis and indusium. The telencephdic commissures in monotremes and marsupials form two transverse bundles in the rostra1 wall of the third ventricle. We owe our knowledge of the history of the pallial commissures in mammals chiefly to the work of Elliot Smith. This author states that these commissures are both contained in the lamina terminalis. The upper (dorsal) commissure represents the com- missure hippocampi or psalterium; the lower (ventral) contains the comrnissura anterior and the fibers which serve the functions of the corpus callosum. In mammals as the general pallium grows in extent there is a corresponding increase in the number of corpus callosum fibers. These fibers are transferred from the lower to the upper bundle in the lamina terminalis, in which corpus callosum and psalterium then lie side by side. As the pallium grows the corpus callosum becomes larger, rises up and bends on itself until it finally forms the great arched structure which we know in higher mammals md man. During all this process two changes have taken place in the lamina terminalis. First, it was invaded by cells frDm theneigh- boring medial portion of the olfactory lobe so that the paired 1 Neurological studies, University of Minnesota, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Wnt Signaling in Hippocampal Development 459
    Development 127, 457-467 (2000) 457 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 2000 DEV9689 A local Wnt-3a signal is required for development of the mammalian hippocampus Scott M. K. Lee1,*, Shubha Tole2,‡, Elizabeth Grove2 and Andrew P. McMahon1,§ 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Biolabs, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Department of Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Physiology, Committees on Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, and Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA *Current address: Nina Ireland Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Center for Neurobiology and Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Programs in Neuroscience, Developmental Biology and Biomedical Sciences, 401 Parnassus Avenue, University of California at San Francisco, CA 94143-0984, USA ‡Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai-400,005, India §Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 27 October 1999; published on WWW 12 January 2000 SUMMARY The mechanisms that regulate patterning and growth of the appear to be specified normally, but then underproliferate. developing cerebral cortex remain unclear. Suggesting a By mid-gestation, the hippocampus is missing or role for Wnt signaling in these processes, multiple Wnt represented by tiny populations of residual hippocampal genes are expressed in selective patterns in the embryonic cells. Thus, Wnt-3a signaling is crucial for the normal cortex. We have examined the role of Wnt-3a signaling at growth of the hippocampus. We suggest that the the caudomedial margin of the developing cerebral cortex, coordination of growth with patterning may be a general the site of hippocampal development.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.4 Schizophrenia: Neurobiology
    12.4 SCHIZOPHRENIA: NEUROBIOLOGY Kaplan & Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry CHAPTER 12. SCHIZOPHRENIA 12.4 SCHIZOPHRENIA: NEUROBIOLOGY MICHAEL F. EGAN, M.D., AND THOMAS M. HYDE, M.D., PH.D. Role of Genes and Environment Structural and Functional Neuroimaging Neuropathology Neurochemistry Neural Circuits Neurobiological Models Schizophrenia is a chronic mental illness affecting approximately 1 percent of the population. Beginning in early adulthood, schizophrenia typically causes a dramatic, lifelong impairment in social and occupational functioning. From a public health standpoint, the costs of treatment and lost productivity make this illness one of the most expensive disorders in medicine. Despite the tremendous economic and emotional costs, research on schizophrenia lags far behind that on other major medical disorders. A primary impediment to developing more effective treatment is the limited understanding of the etiology and neurobiology of this disorder. New technologies, such as neuroimaging and molecular genetics, are removing the obstacles that once blocked major progress in the field. Although the stigma associated with the illness has not yet been eliminated, these new techniques have markedly altered the conception of the nature of schizophrenia. One of the most rapidly changing fields is genetics. Family, twin, and adoption studies have clearly shown that genes play a prominent role in the development of schizophrenia. Estimates of heritability typically range from 50 to 85 percent. Initial attempts to isolate major genes using linkage studies were unsuccessful, but more recent approaches using increasingly sophisticated methods have uncovered several chromosomal regions that may harbor genes of minor effect. It seems likely that schizophrenia is the result of the interaction of many genes, some of which also interact with environmental factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Borders and Cytoarchitecture of the Perirhinal and Postrhinal Cortices in the Rat
    THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY 437:17–41 (2001) Borders and Cytoarchitecture of the Perirhinal and Postrhinal Cortices in the Rat REBECCA D. BURWELL* Department of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 ABSTRACT Cytoarchitectonic and histochemical analyses were carried out for perirhinal areas 35 and 36 and the postrhinal cortex, providing the first detailed cytoarchitectonic study of these regions in the rat brain. The rostral perirhinal border with insular cortex is at the extreme caudal limit of the claustrum, consistent with classical definitions of insular cortex dating back to Rose ([1928] J. Psychol. Neurol. 37:467–624). The border between the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices is at the caudal limit of the angular bundle, as previously proposed by Burwell et al. ([1995] Hip- pocampus 5:390–408). The ventral borders with entorhinal cortex are consistent with the Insausti et al. ([1997] Hippocampus 7:146–183) description of that region and the Dolorfo and Amaral ([1998] J. Comp. Neurol. 398:25–48) connectional findings. Regarding the remaining borders, both the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices encroach upon temporal cortical regions as defined by others (e.g., Zilles [1990] The cerebral cortex of the rat, p 77–112; Paxinos and Watson [1998] The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates). Based on cytoarchitectonic and histochemical criteria, perirhinal areas 35 and 36 and the postrhinal cortex were further subdivided. Area 36 was parceled into three subregions, areas 36d, 36v, and 36p. Area 35 was parceled into two cytoarchitectonically distinctive subregions, areas 35d and 35v. The postrhinal cortex was di- vided into two subregions, areas PORd and PORv.
    [Show full text]
  • Limbic System
    Limbic System Objective • To learn the complex 3-dimensional anatomy of some of the C-shaped deep brain structures • To become familiar with the brain systems for emotions and learning and memory, with an emphasis on the amygdala and hippocampal formation NTA Ch 15, pgs. 447-462 Key Figs. 15-1 through 15-6 Table 15-1 Clinical Case #13 Temporal lobe epilepsy; CC13-1 Self evaluation • Be able to identify all structures listed in key terms and describe briefly their principal functions • Use neuroanatomy on the web to test your understanding I-1 General anatomical organization of the limbic system The medial surfaces of the telencephalon and diencephalon are illustrated in the top panel. Below is a “cut-away” view of diencephalic and telencephalic nuclei and tracts. Use these two illustrations to familiarize yourself with the key structures of the limbic system. On the medial brain surface, identify the limbic association areas: the cingulate and parahippocampal gyri and the cortex of the temporal pole. The orbital gyri are not visible on this slide. What are some functions of the parahippocampal gyrus and temporal pole? The amygdala and rostral hippocampal formation are under the region of the uncus. Space occupying lesions above the cerebellar tentorium may cause the uncus on the side of the lesion to become displaced medially thereby squeezing the midbrain and the third nerves. This is termed uncal herniation. The more caudal portions of the hippocampal formation are located beneath the parahippocampal gyrus. The septal nuclei (see outline of approximate boundaries in the lower brain view) are located on the lateral surface of the septum pellucidum.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Cerebral Cortex of the Humpback Whale, Megaptera Novaeangliae (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Balaenopteridae)
    THE ANATOMICAL RECORD 290:1–31 (2007) Structure of the Cerebral Cortex of the Humpback Whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Balaenopteridae) 1,2 1 PATRICK R. HOF * AND ESTEL VAN DER GUCHT 1Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 2New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, New York ABSTRACT Cetaceans diverged from terrestrial mammals between 50 and 60 million years ago and acquired, during their adaptation to a fully aquatic milieu, many derived features, including echolocation (in odontocetes), re- markable auditory and communicative abilities, as well as a complex social organization. Whereas brain structure has been documented in detail in some odontocetes, few reports exist on its organization in mysti- cetes. We studied the cerebral cortex of the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) in comparison to another balaenopterid, the fin whale, and representative odontocetes. We observed several differences between Meg- aptera and odontocetes, such as a highly clustered organization of layer II over the occipital and inferotemporal neocortex, whereas such pattern is restricted to the ventral insula in odontocetes. A striking observation in Megaptera was the presence in layer V of the anterior cingulate, ante- rior insular, and frontopolar cortices of large spindle cells, similar in mor- phology and distribution to those described in hominids, suggesting a case of parallel evolution. They were also observed in the fin whale and the largest odontocetes, but not in species with smaller brains or body size. The hippocampal formation, unremarkable in odontocetes, is further diminutive in Megaptera, contrasting with terrestrial mammals. As in odontocetes, clear cytoarchitectural patterns exist in the neocortex of Megaptera, making it possible to define many cortical domains.
    [Show full text]