DOCSLIB.ORG

Differences in the Composition of Leachate from Active and Non

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Differences in the Composition of Leachate from Active and Non water Article Differences in the Composition of Leachate from Active and Non-Operational Municipal Waste Landfills in Poland Aleksandra Wdowczyk * and Agata Szyma ´nska-Pulikowska Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 24, 50-363 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-71-320-5544 Received: 27 September 2020; Accepted: 5 November 2020; Published: 8 November 2020 Abstract: Leachate formation is one of the many environmental hazards associated with landfilling. The leachate may migrate from the landfill to surface water and groundwater, posing a potential threat to aquatic ecosystems. Moreover, its harmful effect on human health and life has been proven. Due to the risks that landfill leachates may pose, it is necessary to control the state of the environment in their surroundings. The paper presents an example of the application of selected statistical methods (basic statistics, statistical tests, principal component analysis) to assess the impact of individual pollution indicators on the quality of landfill leachates. The conducted analysis showed the existence of significant differences between the surveyed active (Legnica, Jawor) and non-operational (Wrocław, Bielawa) landfills in Poland. These differences were especially visible in the cases of the following: electric conductivity (EC) (non-operational landfills 1915–5075 µS/cm, active 5093–11,370 µS/cm), concentrations of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) (non-operational landfills 0.18–294.5 mg N/dm3, active 167.56–907.4 mg N/dm3), chemical oxygen demand (COD), organic nitrogen (ON), ammonium nitrogen (AN), total solids (TS), total dissolved solids (TDS), total suspended solids (TSS), sulfates, chlorides, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and nickel. Selected indicators should help to determine the progress of decomposition processes inside the landfill and the potential impact of leachate on the environment, and should be used in the mandatory monitoring of landfills. Keywords: municipal waste landfills; leachate monitoring; pollution indicators 1. Introduction Leachate formation is one of the many environmental hazards associated with landfilling [1]. A leachate can be defined as a fluid that seeps through a landfill and is discharged from or contained in a landfill [2]. The leachate contains soluble organic and inorganic compounds, suspended particles and heavy metals [3]. As a result of the physical, chemical and microbiological processes taking place inside the landfill, the leachate takes over a number of substances, and as a result it becomes a highly polluted wastewater [4,5]. The composition of the leachate is dynamic and variable in time, depending on, among other things, the nature of the deposited waste and the chemical and biochemical decomposition processes taking place in it [6], the stabilization level of the deposited waste, the collection system, as well as the location of the landfill and hydrological factors [7,8]. As landfill leachate is one of the main pollutants of the soil and water environment, knowledge of its composition is important in determining the long-term environmental impact of landfills [9]. Leachate from municipal landfills usually contains dissolved organic and inorganic compounds, such Water 2020, 12, 3129; doi:10.3390/w12113129 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Water 2020, 12, 3129 2 of 15 as ammonia, calcium, magnesium, sodium, chlorides, iron and heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel and zinc) [5,10–12]. The leachate may migrate from the landfill to surface water and groundwater, posing a potential threat to aquatic ecosystems [10]. Moreover, its harmful effect on human health and life has been proven [3]. Due to the risks that landfill leachates may pose, it is necessary to control the state of the environment in their surroundings [13,14]. Therefore, the European Union has introduced EU-wide regulations aimed at preserving and improving the quality of the natural environment, i.e., Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste [2]. For all EU countries, uniform general tasks for the monitoring of landfills in the operational and after-closure phases have been established. Their aim is to determine the potential impact of landfills on the environment and to select appropriate measures to regulate this impact. One of the most important provisions of the Directive on monitoring the water environment in the vicinity of municipal waste disposal sites is the requirements concerning the frequency of testing the volume and composition of leachate. They oblige member states to regularly monitor the leachate condition. Despite the introduction of these regulations, the scope of the parameters to be monitored is not specified. It is only specifies that the analyzed substances should be selected on the basis of the composition of the deposited waste. Due to such a situation, the scope of seepage water testing varies significantly between EU member states. This can be observed in the example of several selected EU countries. In Luxembourg, landfill leachate monitoring is carried out under the Grand-Ducal Regulation of 24 February 2003 on the landfill of waste [15]. During the operational and after-closure phase, the parameters tested in the seepage water are determined after prior verification, in accordance with the expected composition of the leachate and the quality of groundwater, but not to a lesser extent than indicated in the Regulation. This includes 23 indicators, as follows: pH, electric conductivity, temperature, chlorides, fluorides, sulfates, nitrates, nitrites, sodium, potassium, ammonium nitrogen, free cyanides, chemical oxygen demand, heavy metals (copper, zinc, lead, cadmium, chromium, mercury, arsenic), total organic carbon, phenols and hydrocarbons. In Portugal, the monitoring of seepage water during the operational phase of a landfill site and after its closure involves a total of 36 parameters analyzed at different intervals, as follows: once a month—pH, electric conductivity, chemical oxygen demand, chlorides, ammonium nitrogen; once every 3 months—carbonates/bi-carbonates, cyanides, arsenic, total chromium, chromium (VI), cadmium, mercury, lead, potassium, phenolic index; once every six months—total organic carbon, fluorides, nitrates, nitrites, sulfates, sulfides, aluminum, barium, boron, copper, iron, manganese, zinc, antimony, nickel, selenium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, adsorbed halogenated compounds (AOX), total hydrocarbons [16]. In Hungary, the parameters to be examined within the framework of seepage water monitoring are determined each time on the basis of the decision of an environmental protection authority, taking into account the composition of waste and hydrogeological properties of the landfill site [17]. Similarly, in Ireland, the parameters to be analyzed in landfill leachate are defined individually in the landfill permit. This range depends on the type and composition of the deposited waste [18]. In Poland, the scope, time, frequency, method and conditions of monitoring are specified in the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 30 April 2013 on the landfill of waste [19]. On its basis, the state of the water environment in the vicinity of the municipal waste landfill site is assessed at particular stages of its operation. Landfill leachate tests are carried out, covering 10 indicator parameters, i.e., pH, conductivity, sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), total organic carbon (TOC) and heavy metals content, including copper, zinc, lead, cadmium, chromium (VI) and mercury. Where a municipal landfill is equipped with a leachate treatment system, samples for physicochemical composition testing are taken at each point of leachate discharge from the landfill, in order to control the effectiveness of the treatment process. Water 2020, 12, 3129 3 of 15 The research on the volume and composition of leachate is carried out in both the operational and post-operationalWater 2020, 12, x FOR phase. PEER REVIEW In theoperational phase, the tests are carried out every 3 months, while in3 of the 15 post-operational phase, every 6 months. No studies are required to establish a set of parameters for thefor monitoringthe monitori ofng landfill of landfill leachate. leachate. It is possibleIt is possible to select to select additional additional parameters, parameters, but due but to due the to costs, the landfillcosts, landfill managers managers most often most order often testsorder only tests within only within the binding the binding scope. scope. TheThe aimaim ofof thethe studystudy waswas toto analyzeanalyze thethe didifferencesfferences betweenbetween thethe compositionscompositions ofof leachatesleachates fromfrom activeactive andand non-operationalnon-operational municipalmunicipal landfills.landfills. The indicators selected in this way shouldshould helphelp toto determinedetermine thethe progressprogress ofof decompositiondecomposition processesprocesses insideinside thethe landfilllandfill andand thethe potentialpotential impactimpact ofof leachateleachate onon thethe environment,environment, andand shouldshould bebe usedused inin thethe mandatorymandatory monitoringmonitoring ofof landfills.landfills. 2.2. Materials and MethodsMethods 2.1.2.1. Study Area TheThe researchresearch waswas conductedconducted inin thethe yearsyears 2018–20192018–2019 onon fourfour municipalmunicipal wastewaste landfillslandfills
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    WATER GLOBAL PRACTICE QUALITY UNKNOWN BACKGROUND PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized Determinants of Public Disclosure Authorized Essayas Ayana Declining Water Quality Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized About the Water Global Practice Launched in 2014, the World Bank Group’s Water Global Practice brings together financing, knowledge, and implementation in one platform. By combining the Bank’s global knowledge with country investments, this model generates more firepower for transformational solutions to help countries grow sustainably. Please visit us at www.worldbank.org/water or follow us on Twitter at @WorldBankWater. About GWSP This publication received the support of the Global Water Security & Sanitation Partnership (GWSP). GWSP is a multidonor trust fund administered by the World Bank’s Water Global Practice and supported by Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Netherlands’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Switzerland’s State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, U.K. Department for International Development, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Please visit us at www.worldbank.org/gwsp or follow us on Twitter #gwsp. Determinants of Declining Water Quality Essayas Ayana © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Leachate Quantities After Closure of a Landfill
    Leachate Quantities after Closure of a Landfill Ali Khatami, Ph.D., P.E., The leachate quantities for SCS Engineers the period of 2010 through 2014 were obtained and Criteria for the solid waste analyzed. The data clearly landfills (40 CFR Part 258 shows a downward trend of or the Subtitle D Federal) leachate quantities following have been around for over 30 closure, as would be years and many municipal expected. Leachate collected solid waste (MSW) landfills from the landfill during have been constructed 2010 was reported on a with lining systems in monthly basis when leachate accordance with the Subtitle quantities after closure were D requirements. However, still high and needed to be very few Subtitle D landfills removed from the facility have been entirely closed for disposal every month. with final covers that include However, leachate quantities a geomembrane barrier layer. rapidly decreased and The significance of the final Glades County Landfill after closing. monthly shipment of leachate covers with geomembrane was no longer necessary; is that percolation of rain Since the landfill was closed in one single construction event, rain water instead, leachate was removed when water into the landfill essentially the storage tank reached a point that stops following completion of the percolation was essentially eliminated almost instantaneously considering the leachate had to be removed and final cover. Assuming the final cover quantities reported. Therefore, the the 20-year time frame the landfill was system remains intact, leachate that data did not have monthly values, but continues to be generated after closure open. It is important to note that the maximum thickness of waste in the clusters of several-months data.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants in Constructed Wetlands Help to Treat Agricultural Processing Wastewater
    UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture Title Plants in constructed wetlands help to treat agricultural processing wastewater Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/67s9p4z8 Journal California Agriculture, 65(2) ISSN 0008-0845 Authors Grismer, Mark E Shepherd, Heather L Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ReseaRch aRticle ▼ Plants in constructed wetlands help to treat agricultural processing wastewater by Mark E. Grismer and Heather L. Shepherd Over the past three decades, winer- ies in the western United States and sugarcane processing for ethanol in Central and South America have experienced problems related to the treatment and disposal of pro- cess wastewater. Both winery and sugarcane (molasses) wastewaters are characterized by large organic loadings that change seasonally and are detrimental to aquatic life. We examined the role of plants for treating these wastewaters in constructed wetlands. In the green- house, subsurface-flow flumes with agricultural processing wastewaters may have high concentrations of organic matter that volcanic rock substrates and plants contaminate surface waters when discharged downstream. at imagery estate Winery in Glen ellen, constructed wetlands with plants were tested for their ability to remove pollutants. steadily removed approximately 80% of organic-loading oxygen demand Shepherd et al. (2001) described the sugarcane and winery wastewater from sugarcane process wastewater negative impacts of winery wastewater Sugarcane, food-processing, winery after about 3 weeks of plant growth; downstream, which led to requirements and other distilleries generate waste- for its control and on-site treatment. waters from processing and equipment unplanted flumes removed about Similarly, downstream degradation wash-down.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Leachate Recirculation at Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
    Guidance for Leachate Recirculation at Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Waste/Solid Waste #5.08 • June 2009 Introduction leachate generation, and thus, potential groundwater quality impacts. This Guidance has been developed to meet three goals: Of the waste in landfills at Minnesota Contents MSWLFs in 2006, approximately 77 1. Provide municipal solid waste percent went to facilities that currently Introduction ............... 1 landfill (MSWLF) owners with the have active gas collection systems History ....................... 1 minimum standards to implement Benefits ..................... 2 (Burnsville, Clay, Crow Wing, East Goals......................... 2 leachate recirculation as a tool in Central, Elk River, Pine Bend, and Spruce Design ....................... 3 managing leachate on-site and Ridge). Also in 2006, 43 percent of the Operation .................. 4 minimizing the long-term impact of waste stream went to facilities that Landfill gas the disposed waste to human health recirculate their leachate (Crow Wing, East management ............. 5 and the environment. Monitoring ................. 5 Central, Elk River, Lyon, Morrison, and Physical monitoring 2. Encourage the control of greenhouse Spruce Ridge). parameters ................ 6 Leachate monitoring gas (GHG) emissions at MSWLFs. parameters ................ 6 3. Encourage the production of energy Gas monitoring parameters ................ 7 from landfill gas as an alternative Reporting................... 8 renewable energy source. Closure...................... 9 Long-term care.......... 9 It is the intention of the Minnesota Contact information ... 9 Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to approve leachate recirculation through permit reissuance or major permit modification at MSWLFs that meet the minimum guidelines outlined herein. This guidance supersedes any previous policy or guidance on leachate recirculation. Current MSWLF design and operation does not promote the degradation of History disposed organic wastes within a In 2006, almost 1.5 million tons of waste reasonable timeframe.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Salt Lake Brine Chemistry Database, 1966–2011
    GREAT SALT LAKE BRINE CHEMISTRY DATABASE, 1966–2011 by Andrew Rupke and Ammon McDonald OPEN-FILE REPORT 596 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2012 GREAT SALT LAKE BRINE CHEMISTRY DATABASE, 1966–2011 by Andrew Rupke and Ammon McDonald Cover photo: The Southern Pacific Railroad rock causeway. The view is to the east, and the north arm of Great Salt Lake is on the left. OPEN-FILE REPORT 596 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2012 STATE OF UTAH Gary R. Herbert, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Michael Styler, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard G. Allis, Director PUBLICATIONS contact Natural Resources Map & Bookstore 1594 W. North Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3320 toll-free: 1-888-UTAH MAP website: mapstore.utah.gov email: [email protected] UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY contact 1594 W. North Temple, Suite 3110 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3300 website: geology.utah.gov This open-file release makes information available to the public that may not conform to UGS technical, edito- rial, or policy standards; this should be considered by an individual or group planning to take action based on the contents of this report. Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Waste Leachate Toxicity Evaluation and Hazard Quotient Derivation by Allium Assay
    Current World Enviroment Vol. 2(2), 221-224 (2007) Pesticide waste leachate toxicity evaluation and hazard quotient derivation by Allium assay SARVESH and PRABHAKAR P. SINGH Department of Environmental Sciences, Dr. R.M.L. Avadh University, Faizabad - 2244 001 (India) (Received: November 12, 2007; Accepted: December 23, 2007) ABSTRACT This study was envisaged to explore the impact of pesticide solid waste leachate to Allium cepa (common onion) bulbs. Bulbs exposed to the leachate showed hampered root growth and morphological deformities. At 15% and higher concentrations of leachate after 5 days, gall like swellings were noticed around the mitotic zone (zone of root growth). From the dose response th th th th curve, the EC50 values for the 5 , 10 , 15 and 20 day were calculated and the highest EC50 value, th th 24.9%, was for the 5 day while the lowest EC50 value, 20%, was for the 20 day. The EC50 decreases th th th from 5 to the 20 day successively. The 5 day EC50 was used to determine the hazard quotient (HQ) of the pesticide waste leachate from the dumping site. A value of 4.49 as HQ suggests that that there is considerable risk, as any value of HQ above one (>1) is environmentally unacceptable. The response in root growth pattern, residue analysis and the HQ indicates that the leachate is toxic to rot growth of onion and steps for proper management of hazardous waste and leachate are urgently required. Keywords: Allium cepa; bioassay; pesticide waste; leachate; EC50; hazard quotient INTRODUCTION studies6,7 and risk characterization is the estimation of the incidence and severity of the effects likelihood According to a 1997 market estimate, to occur in an environmental compartment due to approximately 5684 million pounds of pesticide actual or predicted exposure to a chemical.
    [Show full text]
  • FULLTEXT01.Pdf
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Science of the Total Environment. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Arp, H P., Morin, N A., Andersson, P L., Hale, S E., Wania, F. et al. (2020) The presence, emission and partitioning behavior of polychlorinated biphenyls in waste, leachate and aerosols from Norwegian waste-handling facilities Science of the Total Environment, 715: 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136824 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-169377 Science of the Total Environment 715 (2020) 136824 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv The presence, emission and partitioning behavior of polychlorinated biphenyls in waste, leachate and aerosols from Norwegian waste- handling facilities Hans Peter H. Arp a,b,⁎, Nicolas A.O. Morin a,c,PatrikL.Anderssond, Sarah E. Hale a, Frank Wania e, Knut Breivik f,g, Gijs D. Breedveld a,h a Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), P.O. Box 3930, Ullevål Stadion, N-0806 Oslo, Norway b Department of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491 Trondheim, Norway c Environmental and Food Laboratory of Vendée (LEAV), Department of Chemistry, Rond-point Georges Duval CS 80802, 85021 La Roche-sur-Yon, France d Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden e Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada f Norwegian Institute for Air Research, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectively Managing Landfill Leachate Odor Control With
    Leachate Management As Seen In Effectively Managing Landfill Leachate Odor Control with Permanganate Oxidizing agents can be introduced to landfill leachate during wastewater treatment to kill the offending bacteria and reduce odor emissions to zero. Permanganate application successfully controls obnoxious odors that are released when storing and transferring landfill leachate. n By John Boll Leachate is formed when liquid passes through a landfill and odor emissions to zero. In the cases described in this article, mixes with degraded waste, picking up dissolved and suspended oxidizers such as hydrogen peroxide and chlorine were tested material. This nasty liquid contains organic and inorganic but not suitable for elimination of the offending odor. However, contaminants as well as heavy metals and pathogens. permanganate application successfully controlled obnoxious odors High levels of odor causing compounds are also found in leachate. that were released when storing and transferring landfill leachate. The primary odorant is volatile hydrogen sulfide (H2S) which When sodium permanganate is injected into leachate, in accumulates to very high levels in closed wet wells, junction boxes minutes, it reacts with dissolved hydrogen sulfide, reducing odor and pipes of collection systems. Hydrogen sulfide is generated by emissions to zero. the conversion of dissolved sulfate by anaerobic bacteria. It has an easily recognizable unpleasant, rotten egg characteristic. It Site #1 Background is detected by the human nose at very low threshold levels, but A landfill in the Northeastern U.S. operates one open cell and can also desensitize the nose after short-term exposure. Hydrogen accepts construction and demolition waste, including wall board. sulfide is a dense, heavier-than-air gas and it accumulates in Numerous neighbor complaints about odors associated with the confined spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Dissolved Solids in Drinking-Water
    WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/16 English only Total dissolved solids in Drinking-water Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality __________________ Originally published in Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Health criteria and other supporting information. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996. © World Health Organization 2003 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dissemination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications - whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution - should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The World Health
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Total Dissolved Solids Regulation In
    Investigation of Total Dissolved Solids Regulation in the Appalachian Plateau Physiographic Province: A Case Study from Pennsylvania and Recommendations for the Future by Mark Wozniak A project submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Environmental Assessment Raleigh, North Carolina 2011 Advisory Chair: Linda Taylor ii ABSTRACT WOZNIAK, MARK. Investigation of Total Dissolved Solids Regulation in the Appalachian Plateau Physiographic Province: A Case Study from Pennsylvania and Recommendations for the Future. (Under the direction of Linda Taylor and Dr. Chris Hofelt). Total dissolved solids (TDS) are a natural constituent of surface water throughout the world. The World Health Organization, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and most states regulate TDS as a secondary drinking water criteria, affecting taste and odor, limiting discharges to 500 mg/L. This method of regulation fails to account for the conservative nature of TDS, with in-stream concentrations increasing with each addition, as well as impacts to aquatic life. New sources of TDS are further stressing historically contaminated waterways throughout the Appalachian Plateau, leaving them unable to assimilate additional TDS. With these new sources only projected to increase, it is necessary, now more than ever, for the states to develop total maximum daily loads for the affected waterways. This is the most effective method for regulating TDS to ensure the sustained health of the regional aquatic communities and human health. iii BIOGRAPHY Mark Wozniak has lived in western Pennsylvania all his life, where he attained an interest in all aspects of the natural environment at an early age.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatability of a Highly-Impaired, Saline Surface Water for Potential Urban Water Use
    water Article Treatability of a Highly-Impaired, Saline Surface Water for Potential Urban Water Use Frederick Pontius Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Management, Gordon and Jill Bourns College of Engineering, California Baptist University, Riverside, CA 92504, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-951-343-4846 Received: 14 January 2018; Accepted: 14 March 2018; Published: 15 March 2018 Abstract: As freshwater sources of drinking water become limited, cities and urban areas must consider higher-salinity waters as potential sources of drinking water. The Salton Sea in the Imperial Valley of California has a very high salinity (43 ppt), total dissolved solids (70,000 mg/L), and color (1440 CU). Future wetlands and habitat restoration will have significant ecological benefits, but salinity levels will remain elevated. High salinity eutrophic waters, such as the Salton Sea, are difficult to treat, yet more desirable sources of drinking water are limited. The treatability of Salton Sea water for potential urban water use was evaluated here. Coagulation-sedimentation using aluminum chlorohydrate, ferric chloride, and alum proved to be relatively ineffective for lowering turbidity, with no clear optimum dose for any of the coagulants tested. Alum was most effective for color removal (28 percent) at a dose of 40 mg/L. Turbidity was removed effectively with 0.45 µm and 0.1 µm microfiltration. Bench tests of Salton Sea water using sea water reverse osmosis (SWRO) achieved initial contaminant rejections of 99 percent salinity, 97.7 percent conductivity, 98.6 percent total dissolved solids, 98.7 percent chloride, 65 percent sulfate, and 99.3 percent turbidity.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential for Using Constructed Wetlands to Treat Landfill Leachate: Literature Review and Pilot Study Design
    Potential for Using Constructed Wetlands to Treat Landfill Leachate: Literature Review and Pilot Study Design Sarah K. Liehr and G. Michael Sloop Department of Civil Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695 Special Report Series No. 17 January 1996 The research on which this report is based was financed by the Water Resources Research Institute of The University of North Carolina. Contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Water Resources Research Institute nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement or recommendation for use by the Institute or the State of North Carolina. WRRI Project No. 70125 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Ray Church, Dennis Burks, Sam Hawes, Tim Heistand, and Glenn Walker of New Hanover County Environmental Management for compiling data and assisting in all aspects of construction and operation of the pilot wetland study at the New Hanover County Landfill near Wilmington, North Carolina. We would also like to thank Barbara Doll, Halford House, and Dr. Bob Rubin for their participation in planning the design for the pilot wetland study. We appreciate valuable input from Robert Mackey of Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. during the design of the pilot study. Finally, we would like to thank Jeff Masters for his input in compiling this report. ii ABSTRACf All municipal landfills are susceptible to infiltration by precipitation and runoff. As this water infiltrates the landfill, many substances leach from the fill including oxygen demanding organic compounds, suspended solids, nitrogen compounds, phosphorus, metals, and toxic organics. The composition of the leachate varies tremendously among landfills, but concentrations of several of these components may be quite high.
    [Show full text]