DOCSLIB.ORG

Application for Rulemaking and LOA for Activities Associated with Use of SURTASS LFA Sonar 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Application for Rulemaking and LOA for Activities Associated with Use of SURTASS LFA Sonar 2018 LOA and Rulemaking Application Under MMPA for Use of SURTASS LFA Sonar TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 PROPOSED ACTIVITY ......................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.4 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR SURTASS LFA SONAR .................................................................................. 1-4 1.5 SURTASS LFA SONAR TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................................. 1-4 1.5.1 Active Acoustic System ......................................................................................................... 1-6 1.5.2 Passive Acoustic System ....................................................................................................... 1-7 2 DURATION AND LOCATION OF SURTASS LFA SONAR USE .......................................................... 2-1 2.1 DURATION ...................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 POTENTIAL SURTASS LFA SONAR AREAS ............................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 Geographic Restrictions—Coastal Standoff Range .............................................................. 2-3 2.2.2 Geographic Restrictions—Offshore Biologically Important Areas (OBIAs) for Marine Mammals ............................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.2.2.1 OBIA Selection Criteria ..................................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.2.2 Existing Marine Mammal OBIAs for SURTASS LFA Sonar ................................................. 2-5 2.2.2.3 Potential Marine Mammal OBIAs for SURTASS LFA Sonar ............................................... 2-5 2.2.3 Representative Model Areas ................................................................................................ 2-5 3 MARINE MAMMALS ................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 MARINE MAMMAL SPECIES OCCURRENCE............................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 MARINE MAMMAL ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY ESTIMATES ..................................................................... 3-1 4 STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF POTENTIALLY AFFECTED MARINE MAMMAL SPECIES AND STOCKS ................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 MYSTICETES .................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Antarctic Minke Whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) ........................................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Blue Whale (Balaenoptera musculus) and Pygmy Blue Whale (Balaenoptera musculus brevicauda) .......................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3 Bryde’s Whale (Balaenoptera edeni) .................................................................................... 4-4 4.1.4 Common Minke Whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) ........................................................ 4-5 4.1.5 Fin Whale (Balaenoptera physalus) ..................................................................................... 4-7 4.1.6 Gray Whale (Eschrichtius robustus) ..................................................................................... 4-8 4.1.7 Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) ..................................................................... 4-9 4.1.8 North Pacific Right Whale (Eubalaena japonica) ............................................................... 4-13 4.1.9 Omura’s Whale (Balaenoptera omurai) ............................................................................. 4-14 4.1.10 Sei Whale (Balaenoptera borealis) ..................................................................................... 4-15 4.2 ODONTOCETES .............................................................................................................................. 4-16 4.2.1 Baird’s Beaked Whale (Berardius bairdii) ........................................................................... 4-16 4.2.2 Common Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)............................................................. 4-17 ii Table of Contents LOA and Rulemaking Application Under MMPA for Use of SURTASS LFA Sonar 4.2.3 Common Dolphin (Delphinus delphis delphis) and Indo-Pacific Common Dolphin (Delphinus delphis tropicalis) ............................................................................................ 4-18 4.2.4 Cuvier’s Beaked Whale (Ziphius cavirostris) ....................................................................... 4-19 4.2.5 Dall’s Porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli) ................................................................................... 4-20 4.2.6 Dwarf Sperm Whale (Kogia sima) and Pygmy Sperm Whale (Kogia breviceps) ................ 4-21 4.2.7 False Killer Whale (Pseudorca crassidens) ......................................................................... 4-21 4.2.8 Fraser’s Dolphin (Lagenodelphis hosei) .............................................................................. 4-23 4.2.9 Harbor Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) .............................................................................. 4-24 4.2.10 Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) .......................................................... 4-25 4.2.11 Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) ................................................................................................. 4-25 4.2.12 Longman’s Beaked Whale (Indopacetus pacificus) ............................................................ 4-27 4.2.13 Melon-headed Whale (Peponocephala electra) ................................................................. 4-27 4.2.14 Mesoplodon Species ........................................................................................................... 4-28 4.2.15 Northern Right Whale Dolphin (Lissodelphis borealis) ....................................................... 4-29 4.2.16 Pacific White-sided Dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) .............................................. 4-30 4.2.17 Pantropical Spotted Dolphin (Stenella attenuata) ............................................................. 4-30 4.2.18 Pygmy Killer Whale (Feresa attenuata).............................................................................. 4-31 4.2.19 Risso’s Dolphin (Grampus griseus) ..................................................................................... 4-32 4.2.20 Rough-toothed Dolphin (Steno bredanensis) ..................................................................... 4-33 4.2.21 Short-finned Pilot Whale (Globicephala macrorhynchus) .................................................. 4-34 4.2.22 Southern Bottlenose Whale (Hyperoodon planifrons) ....................................................... 4-35 4.2.23 Sperm Whale (Physeter macrocephalus) ........................................................................... 4-36 4.2.24 Spinner Dolphin (Stenella longirostris) ............................................................................... 4-37 4.2.25 Striped Dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) ............................................................................. 4-38 4.3 PINNIPEDS .................................................................................................................................... 4-38 4.3.1 Otariids ............................................................................................................................... 4-39 4.3.1.1 Northern Fur Seal (Callorhinus ursinus) .......................................................................... 4-39 4.3.1.2 Western Steller Sea Lion (Eumetopias jubatus jubatus) ................................................ 4-40 4.3.2 Phocids ............................................................................................................................... 4-41 4.3.2.1 Hawaiian Monk Seal (Monachus schauinslandi) ............................................................ 4-41 4.3.2.2 Ribbon Seal (Phoca fasciata) .......................................................................................... 4-42 4.3.2.3 Spotted Seal (Phoca largha) ........................................................................................... 4-43 5 TYPE OF INCIDENTAL TAKE AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED .......................................................... 5-1 6 INCIDENTAL TAKES ................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 NON-AUDITORY IMPACTS .................................................................................................................. 6-2 6.2 AUDITORY IMPACTS .......................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2017 377 Encyclopedia of Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises
    2017 BOOK REVIEWS 377 Encyclopedia of Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises By Erich Hoyt. 2017. Firefly Books. 300 pages, 49.95 CAD, Cloth. Written by a British-based, dual-citizen Canadian tion that individual animals could be photographed and who is a research scientist, conservationist, and author, identified by distinctive species-specific features, such the Encyclopedia of Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises as flukes, dorsal fins, pigmentation patterns, scars, and provides an interesting and beautiful global overview wounds. this led to great advances in previously dif- of cetaceans. Part pictorial guide, part research over - ficult areas to research such as migration, distribution, view, part coffee table book, and part call to action, and social behaviour. In a general book such as this and brimming with incredibly beautiful photographs obviously not all biological facts can be provided, but showing cetaceans in action, this book will appeal to it does provide an interesting and sometimes astound- many readers in its attractive, easy-to-read format. ing array of biological information. It is quite enlight- the reader will learn a great deal. the book contains ening how little is still known about some cetacean many interesting facts about this hugely popular yet species, even breeding areas and species taxonomy, mystical group of marine mammals. In recounting the and how recently much of the known scientific infor- history of cetacean research and monitoring, the author mation has been gathered. It was sobering to learn that emphasized the major progress made with the realiza- almost half of all cetaceans globally are considered 378 THE CANADIAN FIELD -N ATURALIST Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Balaenoptera Bonaerensis – Antarctic Minke Whale
    Balaenoptera bonaerensis – Antarctic Minke Whale compared to B. bonaerensis. This smaller form, termed the “Dwarf” Minke Whale, may be genetically different from B. bonaerensis, and more closely related to the North Pacific Minke Whales, and thus has been classified B. acutorostrata (Wada et al. 1991; IWC 2001). This taxonomic position, although somewhat controversial, has been accepted by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), and the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). Assessment Rationale The current IWC global estimate of abundance of Antarctic Dr. Meike Scheidat Minke Whales is about 500,000 individuals. The abundance estimates declined from about 700,000 for the second circumpolar set of abundance survey cruises Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern* (1985/86 to 1990/91) to about 500,000 for the third National Red List status (2004) Least Concern (1991/92 to 2003/04). Although this decline was not statistically significant, the IWC Scientific Committee does Reasons for change No change consider these results to reflect a change. However, Global Red List status (2008) Data Deficient whether this change is genuine or attributed to greater proportions of pack ice limiting the survey extent, has not TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None yet been determined. More detailed results from an CITES listing (1986) Appendix I assessment model are available for the mid-Indian to the mid-Pacific region, and suggest that the population Endemic No increased to a peak in 1970 and then declined, with it *Watch-list Data being unclear whether this decline has levelled off or is still continuing past 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • National Progress Reports Japan – 2020 & 2019
    NAMMCO/28/NPR/JP-2020-2019 NAMMCO ANNUAL MEETING 28 22-25 March 2021 Online MEETING OF THE COUNCIL DOCUMENT NPR/ NATIONAL PROGRESS REPORTS JAPAN – 2020 & 2019 JP-2020-2019 Submitted by Japan Action requested For information Japan ProgRep. Large Cetacean/2020 Japan. Progress report on large cetacean research, April 2019 to March 2020 COMPILED BY SATOKO INOUE Institute of Cetacean Research, 4-5 Toyomi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0055, Japan This document summarizes the data and samples of large cetacean, which were collected by the Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR), National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries (NRIFSF) and Fisheries Agency of Japan (FAJ) from April 2019 to March 2020 and austral summer season 2019/20. Sighting data for abundance estimates of large cetaceans were collected in the western North Pacific, the Gulf of Alaska and the Antarctic during systematic sighting surveys. During the surveys, photo-id, biopsy and satellite tracking experiments on large cetaceans were also conducted. A large number of biological data and samples were collected during the last surveys of the New Scientific Whale Research Program in the western North Pacific (NEWREP-NP) and commercial whaling in Japan’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Species and figures of bycatch and stranding of large cetaceans are based on the reports of prefecture governments to the FAJ, which compile reports from individual fishermen, fishery cooperative associations and the general public. Data and samples collected are being analyzed for contributing to the stock assessment and management of large cetaceans in the North Pacific. 1. SIGHTING DATA Dedicated sighting survey under the program Japanese Abundance and Stock structure Surveys in the Antarctic (JASS-A) in the Southern Ocean in the austral summer season 2019/20 (vessel: Yushin-Maru No.2).
    [Show full text]
  • FC Inshore Cetacean Species Identification
    Falklands Conservation PO BOX 26, Falkland Islands, FIQQ 1ZZ +500 22247 [email protected] www.falklandsconservation.com FC Inshore Cetacean Species Identification Introduction This guide outlines the key features that can be used to distinguish between the six most common cetacean species that inhabit Falklands' waters. A number of additional cetacean species may occasionally be seen in coastal waters, for example the fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus), the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), the long-finned pilot whale (Globicephala melas) and the dusky dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obscurus). A full list of the species that have been documented to date around the Falklands can be found in Appendix 1. Note that many of these are typical of deeper, oceanic waters, and are unlikely to be encountered along the coast. The six species (or seven species, including two species of minke whale) described in this document are observed regularly in shallow, nearshore waters, and are the focus of this identification guide. Questions and further information For any questions about species identification then please contact the Cetaceans Project Officer Caroline Weir who will be happy to help you try and identify your sighting: Tel: 22247 Email: [email protected] Useful identification guides If you wish to learn more about the identification features of various species, some comprehensive field guides (which include all cetacean species globally) include: Handbook of Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises by Mark Carwardine. 2019. Marine Mammals of the World: A Comprehensive Guide to Their Identification by Thomas A. Jefferson, Marc A. Webber, and Robert L. Pitman. 2015. Whales, Dolphins and Seals: A Field Guide to the Marine Mammals of the World by Hadoram Shirihai and Brett Jarrett.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunge Filter Feeding Biomechanics Constrain Rorqual Foraging Ecology Across Scale S
    © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2020) 223, jeb224196. doi:10.1242/jeb.224196 RESEARCH ARTICLE Lunge filter feeding biomechanics constrain rorqual foraging ecology across scale S. R. Kahane-Rapport1,*, M. S. Savoca1, D. E. Cade1,2, P. S. Segre1, K. C. Bierlich3, J. Calambokidis4, J. Dale3, J. A. Fahlbusch1, A. S. Friedlaender2, D. W. Johnston3, A. J. Werth5 and J. A. Goldbogen1 ABSTRACT morphological scaling (Haldane, 1926), resulting in functional Fundamental scaling relationships influence the physiology of vital trade-offs that ultimately impact evolution and ecology. rates, which in turn shape the ecology and evolution of organisms. For The physiological advantages and disadvantages associated with diving mammals, benefits conferred by large body size include different body sizes have wide-ranging effects, from behavior to life reduced transport costs and enhanced breath-holding capacity, history. For example, the smallest animals have the lowest absolute thereby increasing overall foraging efficiency. Rorqual whales feed energetic demands (Kelt and Van Vuren, 1999), yet they may also by engulfing a large mass of prey-laden water at high speed and struggle with thermoregulation and be forced to compensate by filtering it through baleen plates. However, as engulfment capacity increasing their metabolism (Scholander et al., 1950; Taylor et al., increases with body length (engulfment volume∝body length3.57), the 1980). Small size enables high performance maneuverability and surface area of the baleen filter does not increase proportionally agility (Domenici, 2001), but may limit maximum attainable speeds (baleen area∝body length1.82), and thus the filtration time of larger (Carrier, 1994; Hirt et al., 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Feeding Aggregations of Fin Whales Off Elephant Island (Antarctica)
    SC/64/SH9 Fall feeding aggregations of fin whales off Elephant Island (Antarctica) BURKHARDT, ELKE* AND LANFREDI, CATERINA ** * Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine research, Am Alten Hafen 26, 256678 Bremerhaven, Germany ** Politecnico di Milano, University of Technology, DIIAR Environmental Engineering Division Pza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy Abstract From 13 March to 09 April 2012 Germany conducted a fisheries survey on board RV Polarstern in the Scotia Sea (Elephant Island - South Shetland Island - Joinville Island area) under the auspices of CCAMLR. During this expedition, ANT-XXVIII/4, an opportunistic marine mammal survey was carried out. Data were collected for 26 days along the externally preset cruise track, resulting in 295 hrs on effort. Within the study area 248 sightings were collected, including three different species of baleen whales, fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus), humpback whale ( Megaptera novaeangliae ), and Antarctic minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis ) and one toothed whale species, killer whale ( Orcinus orca ). More than 62% of the sightings recorded were fin whales (155 sightings) which were mainly related to the Elephant Island area (116 sightings). Usual group sizes of the total fin whale sightings ranged from one to five individuals, also including young animals associated with adults during some encounters. Larger groups of more than 20 whales, and on two occasions more than 100 individuals, were observed as well. These large pods of fin whales were observed feeding in shallow waters (< 300 m) on the north-western shelf off Elephant Island, concordant with large aggregations of Antarctic krill ( Euphausia superba ). This observation suggests that Elephant Island constitutes an important feeding area for fin whales in early austral fall, with possible implications regarding the regulation of (krill) fisheries in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Allelic Diversity of the PRDM9 Coding Minisatellite in Minke Whales
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.11.422147; this version posted December 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Allelic diversity of the PRDM9 coding minisatellite in minke whales 2 3 Elena Damm*§, Kristian K Ullrich*§, William B Amos†, Linda Odenthal-Hesse*# 4 5 6 Affiliations: 7 *Department Evolutionary Genetics, Research Group Meiotic Recombination and 8 Genome Instability, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plon̈ D-24306, 9 Germany 10 †Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom= 11 #corresponding author 12 §These authors contributed equally 13 14 ORCID IDs: 0000-0002-6261-6076 (E.D.), 0000-0003-4308-9626 (K.K.U.), 0000- 15 0002-5519-2375 (L.O.-H.) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.11.422147; this version posted December 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 24 Running title 25 PRDM9 diversity in minke whales 26 27 Keywords 28 PRDM9, minke whales, Balaenoptera acutorostrata, Balaenoptera bonarensis, 29 Microsatellite loci, mtDNA, postzygotic reproductive isolation, meiotic recombination 30 regulation 31 32 Corresponding Author: 33 34 Dr. Linda Odenthal-Hesse, 35 36 Research Group Leader, Group Meiotic Recombination and Genome Instability, 37 Department of Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology 38 August-Thienemann Str.
    [Show full text]
  • WWF FACTSHEET 12Th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES Santiago, 3-15 November 2002
    CITES 2002 www.panda.org/species/CITES WWF FACTSHEET 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES Santiago, 3-15 November 2002 Northern and Southern minke whales Balaenoptera acutorostrata and B. bonaerensis I. Species Facts History, appearance and distribution The minke whale has been known under this name since the beginning of the 20th century. It is thought that a Norwegian whaler called Meincke, mistook a group of this species for blue whales. Up until the 1930s, no-one in the whaling industry bothered about minke whales because their larger relatives, such as fin and blue whales, were plentiful and brought a higher profit per catch. However, when populations of the larger whales started being seriously depleted, with several species being brought close to extinction, attention turned to minkes. In 1949, Norway alone caught no fewer than 4,000 of this species. By the time the International Whaling Commission’s (IWC) moratorium on commercial whaling was agreed in 1982, minkes were the most important species for whaling in both the North Atlantic and the Antarctic. In 2000, whale scientists agreed that there are in fact two separate species of minke whales, Northern (or Common) Minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) in the Northern hemisphere, and the larger Southern (or Antarctic) minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) in the Southern Hemisphere. Having been around for millions of years, these mammals are cetaceans which belong to the Mysticeti suborder and the Balaenopteridae family (they have baleen plates and ventral grooves). Although the smallest of the rorquals, they may still reach 10 metres (females usually being bigger than males) and weigh up to 10 tonnes.
    [Show full text]
  • Rorqual Whale (Balaenopteridae) Surface Lunge-Feeding Behaviors: Standardized Classification, Repertoire Diversity, and Evolutionary Analyses
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 30(4): 1335–1357 (October 2014) © 2014 Society for Marine Mammalogy DOI: 10.1111/mms.12115 Rorqual whale (Balaenopteridae) surface lunge-feeding behaviors: Standardized classification, repertoire diversity, and evolutionary analyses BRIAN W. KOT,1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, California 90095-1606 U.S.A. and Mingan Island Cetacean Study, Inc., 378 Bord de la Mer, Longue-Pointe-de-Mingan, Quebec G0G 1V0, Canada; RICHARD SEARS, Mingan Island Cetacean Study, Inc., 378 Bord de la Mer, Longue-Pointe-de-Mingan, Quebec G0G 1V0, Canada; DANY ZBINDEN, Meriscope Marine Research Station, 7 chemin de la Marina, Portneuf-sur-Mer, Quebec G0T 1P0, Canada; ELIZABETH BORDA, Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University, 200 Seawolf Parkway, Galveston, Texas 77553, U.S.A.; MALCOLM S. GORDON, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, California 90095-1606, U.S.A. Abstract Rorqual whales (Family: Balaenopteridae) are the world’s largest predators and sometimes feed near or at the sea surface on small schooling prey. Most rorquals cap- ture prey using a behavioral process known as lunge-feeding that, when occurring at the surface, often exposes the mouth and head above the water. New technology has recently improved historical misconceptions about the natural variation in rorqual lunge-feeding behavior yet missing from the literature is a dedicated study of the identification, use, and evolution of these behaviors when used to capture prey at the surface. Here we present results from a long-term investigation of three rorqual whale species (minke whale, Balaenoptera acutorostrata; fin whale, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Prediction Model Paper
    MANUSCRIPT - DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION Mapping world-wide distributions of marine mammal species using a Relative Environmental Suitability (RES) model K. Kaschner1,2, R. Watson1, A.W. Trites2 and D. Pauly1 1Sea Around Us Project, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2259 Lower Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4 2Marine Mammal Research Unit, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Hut B-3, 6248 Biological Sciences Road, Vancouver BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4 Running title: RES mapping of marine mammal distributions Key words: habitat suitability modelling, marine mammals, global, GIS, relative environmental suitability, environmental envelope model, distribution Corresponding author: Kristin Kaschner Marine Mammal Research Unit, Fisheries Centre University of British Columbia Hut B-3, 6248 Biological Sciences Road Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4 CANADA Tel: + 604 822 9150 Fax: + 604 822 8180 Email: [email protected] ************************************************************************************* Submitted to Marine Ecology Progress Series (June 2004) ABSTRACT We developed a large-scale habitat suitability modeling approach to map global distributions of 115 species of marine mammals. Predictions were generated by first assigning each species to broad-scale categories of habitat preferences with respect to depth, sea surface temperature and ice edge association based on synopses of published qualitative and quantitative habitat preference information. Using a global grid with 0.5 degree lat/long cell dimensions, we generated an index of the relative environmental suitability (RES) of each cell for a given species by relating quantified habitat preferences to locally averaged oceanographic conditions in a GIS modeling framework. RES predictions closely matched published maximum range extents for most species, suggesting that our model-based approach for identifying habitat represents a useful, more objective alternative to existing sketched distributional outlines.
    [Show full text]
  • WHALES of the ANTARCTIC PENINSULA Science and Conservation for the 21St Century CONTENTS
    THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PRODUCED IN COLLABORATION WITH REPORT ANTARCTICA 2018 WHALES OF THE ANTARCTIC PENINSULA Science and Conservation for the 21st Century CONTENTS Infographic: Whales of the Antarctic Peninsula 4 1. PROTECTING OCEAN GIANTS UNDER INCREASING PRESSURES 6 2. WHALES OF THE ANTARCTIC PENINSULA 8 Species found in the Antarctic Peninsula are still recovering from commercial whaling 10 Infographic: Humpback whale migration occurs over multiple international and national jurisdictions 12 Whales face several risks in the region and during migrations 15 Authors: Dr Ari Friedlaender (UC Santa Cruz), Michelle Modest (UC Baleen whales use the Antarctic Peninsula to feed on krill Santa Cruz) and Chris Johnson (WWF Antarctic programme). – the keystone species of the Antarctic food chain 16 Contributors: Infographic: The Western Antarctic Peninsula is critical Dr David Johnston (Duke University), Dr Jennifer Jackson feeding habitat for humpback whales 20 (British Antarctic Survey) and Dr Sarah Davie (WWF-UK). Whales play a critical role in Southern Ocean ecosystems 22 Acknowledgements: Special thanks to Rod Downie (WWF-UK), Dr Reinier Hille Ris Lambers (WWF-NL), Rick Leck (WWF-Aus), 3. NEW SCIENCE IS CHANGING OUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHALES 24 Duke University Marine Robotics and Remote Sensing Lab, California Ocean Alliance and One Ocean Expeditions. Technology is providing scientists and policymakers with data to better understand, monitor and conserve Antarctic whales 26 Graphic Design: Candy Robertson Copyediting: Melanie Scaife Satellite and suction-cup tags uncover whale foraging areas and behaviour 28 Front cover photo: © Michael S. Nolan / Robert Harding Picture Library / National Geographic Creative / WWF Long-Term Ecological Research – Palmer Station, Antarctica 29 Photos taken under research permits include: Dr Ari Drones uncovering a new view from above 30 Friedlaender NMFS 14809, ACA 2016-024 / 2017-034, UCSC IACUC friea1706, and ACUP 4943.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearly Trend of Blubber Thickness in the Antarctic Minke Whale Balaenoptera Bonaerensis in Areas IV and V
    NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PERMISSION BY THE AUTHORS JA/J05/JR9 Yearly trend of blubber thickness in the Antarctic minke whale Balaenoptera bonaerensis in Areas IV and V 1) 1) 2) KENJI KONISHI , TSUTOMU TAMURA AND LARS WALLØW 1)The Institute of Cetacean Research, 4-5, Toyomi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0055, Japan 2)Department of Physiology, University of Oslo, 1103, Blindern N-0317 Oslo, Norway KEYWORDS: ANTARCTIC MINKE WHALE; BODY CONDITION; BALAENOPTERA; BLUBBER THICKNESS; SCIENTIFIC PERMITS ABSTRACT To examine the recent trend of body condition and factors that affect the body condition in Antarctic minke whale, blubber thickness from 1987/88 to 2003/04 in Areas IV and V were analysed. In the stepwise multiple regression analyses, the blubber thickness at mid-lateral position was used as dependent variable, and date, diatom film adhesion, sex, longitude (Area) and year was used as explanatory variables. To see the trend of body condition in the end of the feeding season, blubber thickness in February were also examined in each Area and sex. The results of multiple regressions confirmed that blubber thickness of the Antarctic minke whale has decreased for JARPA survey period, and showed all explanatory variables were detected as predictor variables. The results in February also showed decline of blubber thickness over JARPA survey without in pregnant female in Area V. These results indicated that food availability for Antarctic minke whale in Antarctic has decreased. This decline possibly caused by both intraspecific and interspecies competitions for krill resources. INTRODUCTION The Antarctic Ocean consists of simple food web with high productivity and is an important feeding area for the baleen whale, which is one of the major predator groups, consuming mostly on Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba).
    [Show full text]