<<

J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 21: 135–140, 2020 135

A note on minke (: Balaenopteridae) in : strandings review

EDUARDO JURI1,2, MEICA VALDIVIA1; PAULO CÉSAR SIMÕES-LOPES3 AND ALFREDO LE BAS1,4 Contact e-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT The minke is the smallest of the living and is widely distributed in the tropical, temperate and polar of both hemispheres. In the western Southwest Atlantic there are two currently recognised , the dwarf form of the common , acutorostrata unnamed subsp. and the minke whale B. bonaerensis. All stranding records and collected specimens of minke whale on the of Uruguay were reviewed and analysed. Between 1962 and 2018, 33 records were gathered in a non-systematic way, 22 specimens of B. acutorostrata and 11 of B. bonaerensis. It was found that most were discovered alive or recently dead and assigned as neonates/young calves. This supports the hypothesis that Uruguayan are part of an important region for reproduction and breeding for the species. KEYWORDS: DISTRIBUTION; MORPHOMETRICS; STRANDINGS; ; SOUTHWEST

INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Minke whales (Balaenopteridae) are the smallest living Several sources of information were investigated: specimens rorquals and are widely distributed in the tropical, temperate stored in national collections (Museo Nacional de Historia and polar waters of both hemispheres (Leatherwood and Natural at Montevideo; Museo del Mar of Punta del Este and Reeves, 1983). There are two currently recognised species: the Mammalian Collection at the Facultad de Ciencias, the , Balaenoptera acutorostrata Universidad de la República, Montevideo), published (Lacépède, 1804) and the literature and unpublished stranding records. All records B. bonaerensis (Burmeister, 1867) (Mead and Brownell, corresponded to live or dead stranded animals. For practical 2005). The common minke whale presents three reasons, this study will refer to the term stranding in general, distinguishable subspecies that segregate spatially, the North regardless of whether it is a stranding or a beached Atlantic form (B. a. acutorostrata), the North Pacific form in the of Hofman (1991). (B. a. scammoni) and the dwarf form (B. a. unnamed The specimens were identified to a species-specific level subspecies) in the Southern Hemisphere (Rice, 1998). The using cranial or external morphological characteristics and Antarctic minke whale is known to inhabit primarily the maturity status of each was assessed. When the skull was Southern Hemisphere waters (Perrin and Brownell, 2008), available, the species was determined following the main nevertheless there have been records in the Northern criteria proposed by Omura (1975), Arnold et al. (1987) and Hemisphere (Glover et al., 2010; Rosel et al., 2016), Zerbini and Simões-Lopes (2000). In the Antarctic minke although it is not known if these extra-limital movements whale, the parietals and interparietal are not in contact in the have occurred over a long period of time. In the Southern vertex, the anterior border of frontals is concave and the Hemisphere the Antarctic minke whale is partially sympatric anterior margin of the supraoccipital is convex. In the dwarf with the dwarf form of B. acutorostrata (Perrin and minke whale, the parietals and interparietal are in contact in Brownell, 2008). the vertex, the anterior border of frontals is straight and the These two species differ in colour pattern, relative size and anterior margin of the supraoccipital is curved posteriorly in cranial features (Best, 1985; Arnold et al., 1987; Kato and the midline. Fujise, 2000; Zerbini and Simões-Lopes, 2000). As the Whenever possible, the specific identification was also distinction between the dwarf form of B. acutorostrata and achieved based on external colour patterns described by Best the Antarctic minke whale (B. bonaerensis) only came to (1985), Arnold et al. (1987), Zerbini et al. (1996) and Arnold be fully recognised in the late 1990s (Perrin and Brownell, et al. (2005). The Antarctic minke whale presents flippers in 2008) all the early specimen records of minke whales shades of grey, without the white shoulder patch or white deserve a re-examination. Furthermore, the biology of these basal blaze. The dark throat patch does not extend two species in the South Atlantic is poorly known (Zerbini ventrally further than a line roughly between the and et al., 1996; 1997). Consequently, the purpose of this note flipper insertion, so that the ventral grooves appear almost is: (1) to present a review of all stranding records and entirely white in the throat region. The dwarf minke whale collected specimens of B. acutorostrata and B. bonaerensis presents a distinct white patch in the shoulder area and a on the coast of Uruguay, and (2) to assess some ecological white basal flipper blaze. The dark throat patch extends differences between the two species on the basis of the further ventrally, with as many as 15 ventral grooves down available information. from the level of the eye to flipper insertion.

1 Laboratorio de Mamíferos Marinos, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, 25 de mayo 582 CP.11.000 Montevideo, Uruguay. 2 Dirección de Coordinación Científica y Gestión Ambiental, Instituto Antártico Uruguayo, 8 de Octubre 2958 CP. 11.600 Montevideo, Uruguay. 3 Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Universidade Federal de , Campus Universitário CP. 5102 Florianópolis, . 4 Sección Fisiología y Nutrición, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 CP. 11.300 Montevideo, Uruguay. 136 JURI et al.: MINKE WHALE STRANDINGS IN URUGUAY

The maturity status of each whale was assessed and Class II (n = 7; 32%) and Class III (n = 2; 9%). The spatial specimens were separated into three classes based on total distributions of the strandings is illustrated in Fig. 3 and were body length following Zerbini and Simões-Lopes (2000): as follows: 12 records on the coast of Rio de la Plata, 9 on Class I (sexually immature – neonates and young calves), the coast of the Atlantic Ocean and 1 whose location is Class II (sexually immature – possibly subadults) and Class unknown. Of the 16 specimens for which the body condition III (sexually mature). Furthermore, all the data associated was known, 15 exhibited almost no signs of decomposition with the strandings was retrieved and verified. For each (states 1 and 2), 1 moderate decomposition (state 3) and 6 in specimen the total body length, sex, date of stranding, locality, an unknown state. The observed sexual ratio was biased geographic coordinates, and body condition were recorded. towards females (1 male: 7 female), but the low number of Total body length was taken after Norris (1961). Sex was records does not allow us to make any inferences. obtained by visual inspection of external or internal genitalia. For B. bonaerensis the total body length ranged from 240 The date of stranding corresponds to the day on which the to 950cm (Mean = 391cm, SD = 202, Fig. 1). There were no animal was first encountered in the field. Therefore, this date signs of any seasonal pattern in the of standings, must be considered as an approximation for specimens in an possibly due to the low number of observations. Nevertheless, advanced state of decay. The strandings registered by the a continuum of strandings was observed between July and authors have geographic coordinates obtained by GPS in situ. February, with absence in the months of March to June and In the case of stored museum specimens, the stranding October. The specimens classified as Class I (n = 9, 81.8%) locality was read from the original label and the geographical were far more common than those of Class II (n = 1, 9.1%) coordinates were estimated as approximations (coastal and Class III (n = 1, 9.1%). Four strandings were on the coast centroids of locality). Determination of body condition state of Rio de la Plata, 6 on the coast of the Atlantic Ocean and 1 for each specimen followed Kuiken and García-Hartmann whose location is unknown (Fig. 3). Of the 10 specimens for (1991): 1. Animal alive; 2. Recently dead (no bloating); 3. which the condition is known, 9 exhibited almost no signs Moderate decomposition (bloating, skin peeling but organs of decomposition (states 1 and 2) and 1 showed advanced still intact); 4. Advanced decomposition (major bloating, decomposition (state 4). The stranded specimens with organs beyond recognition); and 5. Very advanced information on sex suggested a 1:1 sexual ratio (4 male: 4 decomposition (no organs are present). female). As a result of the analysis of the data recorded in each RESULTS event both species shared some other characteristics in Thirty three records of minke whales were obtained, from relation to the mode of strandings, e.g. very recent or 1962 to 2018. Twenty two specimens (67%) were identified still alive (Fig. 4) or isolated events (i.e. not accompanied as B. acutorostrata (7 females, 15 indeterminate) and 11 with sightings or reports of other living individuals at ). (33%) as B. bonaerensis (4 males, 4 females, 3 indeterminate) Stranded specimens also shared no obvious evidence or signs (see Table 1). It was found that seven specimens held in of , ship strikes or visible pathologies that could have zoological collections were previously misidentified, two were caused the stranding. This does not mean that these are not re-identified as B. acutorostrata and five as B. bonaerensis. implicated in the death of the whales since it was not possible The total body length of B. acutorostrata ranged from to perform post-mortem necropsies. 200 to 800cm (Mean = 349cm, SD = 173cm, see Fig. 1). Strandings of this species occurred between April and DISCUSSION December (apparently almost absent in austral summer) In spite of the modest extent of the Uruguayan coastline (ca. with two strong peaks in April and November (see Fig. 2). 600km), the total number of stranding records of minke The specimens were classified as Class I (n = 13; 59%), whales is high if compared to the results of Zerbini et al.

Fig. 1. Total body length of recorded specimens (cm). Dark grey bars: B. acutorostrata; light grey bars: B. bonaerensis. J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 21: 135–140, 2020 137

MLKJIHGH FIEDCBAHD@HA?CL>BIBH=<>;IH:9LJIAH<>H8C767L54H

+BI>?<@H 3D4H 21IE?H -DDCB<>L?IAH .L?IH 2I,H M0H -D>BH EC

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

    H.I1LC?=I>?AH- HH-L>IJD>IA/H-HH-DJD>LBD/HHHD>?IH*DA4H.L?IHD?IBHLAH BB==5ILC4H M0H?D?LJHKDB5HJI>6?9H E=4H -D>BHAIIH ?I,?4H +BI>?<@H EC/H2HHA;7JJH=DC19DJD654H2D7CEIAH HH 7AIDHBIJHLCHBIH7>?LHBIJH A?IHLJBD>LBD/H3 3HH7AIDH3LELJHBIH ?I?LHBIJH.HD@H?9IH2IEE<>HDDJD6LHHIC?IKCLBDAHD@H?9IH LE7J?LBHBIH-E<ICA?I

Fig. 2. Occurrences according to the month. Dark grey bars: B. acutorostrata; light grey bars: B. bonaerensis. 138 JURI et al.: MINKE WHALE STRANDINGS IN URUGUAY

Fig. 3. Spatial distribution of strandings of minke whale species in Uruguay.

(1996; 1997), who found a total of 42 specimens stranded apparent injuries other than those of the stranding itself. It is for all the coasts of Brazil (ca. 7,400km) from 1914 to 1995. however important to emphasise that bycatch, ship strike or This incidence could be related to the oceanographic other pathologies also cannot be ruled out as the cause of dynamics of the subtropical convergence and the contribution death or stranding. The high incidence of strandings of of fresh from the Uruguay and Parana rivers (Wainer newborns and calves in the area is consistent with the Baldas et al., 2000, Jaime et al., 2002), which make the mouth of and Castello (1986) hypothesis which proposes that these La Plata River a highly variable estuarial region (Guerrero latitudes could be a breeding area for the dwarf form in the et al., 2010). Such variability, as well as its funnel shape, the Southwest Atlantic Ocean (SWA). However, no sightings of presence of many sand banks, the important eolic tides and adults in surrounding waters were reported at any of the intense maritime traffic, may contribute to the amount of strandings. This supports the Zerbini et al. (1997) suggestion strandings recorded in this region (Del Bene et al., 2006). that Antarctic minke whales may give birth in middle Due to the absence of a national stranding program and latitudes (between at least 25º–30ºS) of the SWA, according therefore the lack of systematic field surveillance, our to the migratory pattern of this species (Williamson, 1975). records of minke whales strandings in Uruguay are most In general, Class III specimens were scarce for both likely to be underestimated. Nevertheless, in a regional species. For B. acutorostrata one individual was measured context the by species are not very different to be 800cm, this is unusually long for the species, since from those reported for Brazil (Zerbini et al., 1996; 1997). maximum lengths are considered to be 700cm and 650cm Our sample size does not allow the demonstration of any approximately for female and males respectively (Perrin and significant seasonality of B. acutorostrata and B. bonaerensis Brownell, 2008). This length determination could have stranding pattern. Nevertheless, when considering the resulted from lack of precision in the measurement taken by published data all together, a greater occurrence of both the collectors (none contributed to this study), or an estimate species stranding during winter and spring months is of the size made by the collectors in the field. Nevertheless, observed in southern Brazil, Uruguay and for the northern similar body lengths have been previously recorded in the coast of (Marelli, 1918; Baldas and Castello, 1986; region (Baldas and Castello, 1986). Albareda and Castello, 1990; Bastida et al., 1992; Zerbini et al., 1996; 1997; Secchi et al., 2003; Ott et al., 2010). CONCLUSION For both species, we found a strikingly high frequency Due to the scarce knowledge on the biology of both species of newborns and calves, alive or recently dead, with no of minke whale it is imperative that a systematic record of J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 21: 135–140, 2020 139

Fig. 4. Body condition showing colour pattern for B. acutorostrata (A, B) and B. bonaerensis (C, D). 140 JURI et al.: MINKE WHALE STRANDINGS IN URUGUAY their strandings be maintained. Where possible, necropsies Guerrero, R.A., Piola, A.R., Molinari, G. and Osiroff. A.P. 2010. should be conducted. This should be ideally coordinated at Climatología de temperatura y salinidad en el Río de la Plata y su Frente Marítimo, Argentina-Uruguay. 1st edition. Mar del Plata, Instituto regional level. As previously suggested, the SWA represents Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP), Argentina. an important area for reproduction and breeding of the 95pp. ISBN 978-987-1443-03-1 species (Baldas and Castello, 1986; Zerbini et al., 1997; Ott Hofman, R.J. 1991. History, goals, and achievements of the regional marine stranding networks in the . pp.7–16. In: John E. et al., 2010). Reynolds, III and Daniel K. Odell (Eds) Strandings in Although it is not often that a cause of stranding can be the United States. Proceedings of the Second Marine Mammal Stranding determined, the systematic study of stranded cetaceans Workshop, Miami, Florida, 3–5 December 1987. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 98. provides valuable information about relevant aspects of their Jaime, P.R., Menéndez, A.N. Uriburu Quirno, M. and Torchino, J.A 2002. biology and pathology. Furthermore, in the context of a Análisis del régimen hidrológico de los ríos Paraná y Uruguay, reproduction and breeding area this type of information UNDP/GEF, RLA/99/G31, U.N. Dev. Programme, Ezeiza, Argentina. Kato, H. and Fujise, Y. 2000. Dwarf minke whales: , growth represents a valuable tool for planning future conservation and history with some analyses on morphometric variation among actions towards the species. the different forms and regions. Paper SC/52/OS3 presented to the IWC Scientifc Committee, June 2000, in Adelaide, (unpublished). 30pp. [Paper available from the Office of this Journal]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Kuiken, T. and García-Hartmann, M. (Eds). 1991. Cetacean Pathology: We are indebted to Pablo Etchegaray (Museo del Mar de Dissection Techniques and Tissue Sampling. Proceedings of the Workshop, Leiden, The Netherlands, 13–14 September 1991. ECS Special Punta del Este); Alejandra Rojas (Departamento de Publication Series, Vol.17. [Available from: https://www.europeancetacean Paleontología) and Melitta Meneghel (Sección Zoología society.eu/ecs-special-publication-series] Vertebrados) of the Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad deg Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (Eds.). 1983. The Sierra Club Handbook of Whales and . Sierra Club Books, San Francisco. 302pp. la República, who allowed us to examine skulls and Marelli, C.A. 1918. Un ballenato hallado en la costa del Río de la Plata. catalogues; Alberto Ponce de León, Graciela Fabiano Physis 4:326–28. and Andrés Domingo (Dirección Nacional de Recursos Mead, J.G. and Brownell, R.L., Jr. 2005. Cetacea. pp.723–743. In: D.E. Wilson and D.M. Reeder (Eds.) Mammal Species of the World. The Acuáticos) who kindly provided photographs and information; Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 2,142pp. and Alfredo Langguth (Universidade Federal da Paraíba) for Norris, K.S. 1961. Standarized methods for measuring and recording data logistical support. We would like to thank the two on the smaller cetaceans. J. Mammal. 42:471–76. Omura, H. 1975. Osteological study of the minke whale from the Antarctic. anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 27: 1–36. suggestions that helped to improve the quality of the Ott, P.H., Siciliano, S., Domit, C., Secchi, E.R., Barreto, A.S, Santos, manuscript. We are also thankful to Ian Semple who helped M.C.O., Tavares, M., Danilewicz, D., Moura, J.F., Secco, H.K.C. and Mattos, P.H. 2010. Registros de encalhes de baleia-minke-anã, us improve the English grammar. This work would not Balaenoptera acutorostrata, no sudeste e sul do Brasil, entre 1986 e 2010. have been possible without the permanent support and In Abstracts, XIV Reunião de Trabalho de Especialistas em Mamíferos encouragement of Ricardo Praderi and Enrique M. González Aquáticos da América do Sul, 24–28 October 2010, Florianópolis, Brazil. Perrin, W.F. and Brownell, R.L., Jr. 2008. Minke whales. pp.733–735. In: (Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Montevideo). W.F. Perrin, B. Wursig, and J.G.M. Thewissen (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Marine , 2nd Edition. Academic Press, Burlington, MA. 1,352 REFERENCES pp. Praderi, R. 1980. Adiciones a la lista sistemática de cetáceos de Uruguay, I. Albareda, D. and Castello, H.P. 1990. Estudio preliminar osteológico, pp.136–137 In: Abstracts, Primeras Jornadas de Ciencias Naturales, 29 distribución y madurez sexual de la ballena minke enana. p.1 In: September – 4 October 1980, Montevideo, Uruguay. Resúmenes, IV Reunión de Trabajo de Especialistas en Mamíferos Rice, D.W. 1998. Marine Mammals of the World – Systematics and Acuáticos de América del Sur, 12–15 November 1990, Valdivia, Distribution. Special Publication No. 4, The Society for Marine . . 231pp. ISBN: 978-1891276033. Arnold, P., Alastar, R., Dunstan, A., Lukoschek, V. and Matthews, M. 2005. Rosel, P.E., Wilcox, L.A., Monteiro, C. and Tumlin, M.C. 2016. First record Colour patterns of the dwarf minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata of Antarctic minke whale, Balaenoptera bonaerensis, in the northern Gulf sensu lato: description, cladistic analysis and taxonomic implications. of Mexico. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 9:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200- Mem. Mus. 51(2): 277–307. 016-0058-x Arnold, P., Marsh, H. and Heinsohn, G. 1987. The occurrence of two forms Secchi, E.R., Barcellos, L., Zerbini, A.N. and Dalla-Rosa, L. 2003. of minke whales in East Australian waters with a description of external Biological observations on a dwarf minke whale, Balaenoptera characters and skeleton of the diminutive or dwarf form. Sci. Rep. Whales acutorostrata, caught in Southern Brazilian waters, with a new record of Res. Inst. 38: 1–46. prey for the species. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Mamm. 2(2): 109–115. Baldas, M.I. and Castello, H.P. 1986. Sobre el hallazgo de ejemplares Wainer, I.; Gent, P. and Goni. G. 2000. Annual cycle of the Brazil-Malvinas juveniles de ballena minke (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) en el estuario confluence region in the National Center for Atmospheric Research del Río de la Plata y sur de Brasil. pp.1–13 In: Abstracts, 1ª Reunión de Climate System Model. J. Geophys. Res. 105(C11):26,167–77. Trabajo de Especialistas en Mamíferos Acuáticos de América del Sur, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000134 24–29 June 1984, , Argentina. Williamson, G.R. 1975. Minke whales off Brazil. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. Bastida, R., Rodríguez, D., Moreno, V., Pérez, A., Marcovecchio, J. and 27: 37–59. Gerpe, M. 1992. Varamientos de pequeños cetáceos durante el periodo Ximénez, A., Langguth, A. and Praderi, R. 1972. Lista sistemática de los 1984–1988 en el área de Mar del Plata (Provincia de Buenos Aires). mamíferos del Uruguay. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural pp.1–19 In: Anales, III Reunión de Trabajo de Especialistas en de Montevideo 7(5): 1–49. Mamíferos Acuáticos de América del Sur, 25–30 July 1992, Montevideo, Zerbini, A.N., Secchi, E.R., Siciliano, S. and Simões-Lopes, P.C. 1996. The Uruguay. dwarf form of the minke whale, Balaenoptera acutorostrata Lacépède, Best, P.B. 1985. External characters of southern minke whales and the 1804, in Brazil. Rep. int. Whal. Commn 46: 333–40. existence of a diminutive form. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 36: 1–33. Zerbini, A.N., Secchi, E.R., Siciliano, S. and Simões-Lopes, P.C. 1997. A Del Bene, D., Little, V., Rossi, R. and Le Bas, A. 2006. Revisión preliminar review of the occurrence and distribution of whales of the genus de registros de varamientos de cetáceos en la costa Uruguaya de 1934 a Balaenoptera along the Brazilian coast. Rep. int. Whal. Commn 47: 2005. pp.297–303.In: Menafra, R., L. Rodríguez-Gallego, F. Scarabino 407–17. and D. Conde (Eds.). Bases para la Conservación y Manejo de la Zona Zerbini, A.N. and Simões-Lopes, P.C. 2000. Morphology of the skull and Costera Uruguaya. Vida Silvestre Uruguay, Montevideo. of Southern Hemisphere minke whales. Paper SC/52/OS10 Glover, K.A., Kanda, N., Haug, T., Pastene, L.A., Oien, N., Goto, M., presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, June 2000, in Adelaide, Seliussen, B.B. and Skaug, H.J. 2010. Migration of Antarctic minke Australia (unpublished). 28pp. [Paper available from the Office of this whales to the . PloS One 5(12), e15197: 1–6. Journal]