DOCSLIB.ORG

PEASE-DISSERTATION-2018.Pdf (2.692Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Variation and plasticity and their interaction with urbanization in Guadalupe Bass populations on and off the Edwards Plateau by Jessica E. Pease A Dissertation In Wildlife, Aquatic, and Wildlands Science and Management Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTORAL OF PHILOSOPHY Approved Dr. Timothy Grabowski Co-Chair of Committee Dr. Allison Pease Co-Chair of Committee Dr. Preston Bean Dr. Adam Kaeser Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August 2018 Copyright 2018, Jessica E. Pease Texas Tech University, Jessica E. Pease, August 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to express my extreme gratitude to my advisors Dr. Tim Grabowski and Dr. Allison Pease for their continued efforts, mentorship, and support throughout this project. This research and the completion of my dissertation would not have been possible without their guidance and contributions. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Preston Bean and Dr. Adam Kaeser for their continued support and guidance throughout this project. Additionally, I want to thank all the individuals that have helped with both field and lab work over the past five years. A. Adams, C. Alejandrez, K. Aziz, P. Bean, M. Berlin, T. Birdsong, S. Boles, J. Botros, D. Bradsby, C. Carter, M. Casarez, D. Chilleri, A. Cohen, B. Cook, G. Cummings, M. DeJesus, J. East, S. Fritts, K. Garmany, D. Geeslin, M. Gilbert, D. Gossett, A. Grubh, R. Hawkenson, D. Hendrickson, S. Hill, A. Horn, F. Howell, L. Howell, M. Kelly, G. Kilcrease, K. Kolodziejcyk, T. Lane, D. Leavitt, K. Linner, C. Loeffler, D. Lutz- Carillo, S. Magnelia, K. Mayes, S. McClanahan, A. Nobles, C. Pavliska, S. Robinson, J. Salazar, S. San-Francisco, A. Stevens, C. Vaughan, and E. Verwys, thank you. I want to thank I want to express my sincerest thanks to my lab mates Q. Chen, J. East, J. Taylor, W. Massure, B. Roesler for their time and camaraderie. I want to especially thank my fellow lab mates M. Acre and H. Williams for their advice, support, and friendship for which I am forever grateful. I want to also thank R. Vickory and the staff of the Lower Colorado River Authority McKinney Roughs Nature Park, and T. Arsuffi, R. Stubblefield and K. Lopez at the Texas Tech University- Junction Campus ii Texas Tech University, Jessica E. Pease, August 2018 and Llano River Field Station provided accommodations and lab facilities while in the field. All Water Guides and their clients assisted with capturing Guadalupe Bass in the Lower Colorado River. D. Lutz-Carrilo and the staff at the A.E. Wood Lab for performing all genetic analyses. I also want to thank R. Katz for her efforts and guidance with my analyses in Chapter 4, as well as her assistance in R. R. Edwards and S. Magnelia who provided comments and suggestions on earlier revisions of this dissertation. I want to thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service State Wildlife Grant, Texas Parks and Wildlife, and the Department of Natural Resources at Texas Tech University for funding this project. I also want to thank the entire staff and faculty of the Department of Natural Resources Management and the Texas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at Texas Tech University for all of their support and assistance. Finally, I cannot express how grateful for my friends and family who have showed continued encouragement and unwavering support throughout this entire process. iii Texas Tech University, Jessica E. Pease, August 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ ii Abstract ........................................................................................................................ vii List of Tables.................................................................................................................. x List of Figures .............................................................................................................. xii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 References .................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Changing environmental gradients over forty years alter ecomorphological variation in Guadalupe Bass Micropterus treculii throughout a river basin ................ 15 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 15 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 16 Methods .................................................................................................................... 22 Study Area ............................................................................................................ 22 Environmental datasets ........................................................................................ 24 Morphometric measurements ............................................................................... 27 Data Analysis ....................................................................................................... 30 Results ...................................................................................................................... 33 Historical and present-day landcover and land use in central Texas ................... 33 Hydrologic regime changes.................................................................................. 34 Spatial and temporal morphological variation ..................................................... 35 Environment and morphological divergence ....................................................... 37 Disscussion ............................................................................................................... 42 References ................................................................................................................ 51 iv Texas Tech University, Jessica E. Pease, August 2018 Chapter 3: Variation in growth and recruitment of Guadalupe Bass Micropterus treculii across gradients of flow within a basin ........................................................... 64 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 64 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 65 Methods .................................................................................................................... 69 Study Area ............................................................................................................ 69 Fish Collection ..................................................................................................... 72 Hydrologic Analysis ............................................................................................ 73 Data Analysis ....................................................................................................... 74 Results ...................................................................................................................... 76 Annual Stream Flow Metrics ............................................................................... 76 Growth ................................................................................................................. 81 Mortality and Recruitment ................................................................................... 85 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 87 References ................................................................................................................ 94 Chapter 4: Movement patterns and habitat associations of Guadalupe Bass Micropterus treculii in the lower Colorado River...................................................... 103 Abstract .................................................................................................................. 103 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 104 Methods .................................................................................................................. 109 Study area ........................................................................................................... 109 Radio tagging and tracking ................................................................................ 110 Characterizing instream habitat availability....................................................... 115 Habitat use and availability ................................................................................ 117 v Texas Tech University, Jessica E. Pease, August 2018 Data analysis ...................................................................................................... 117 Habitat model development ............................................................................... 119 Results .................................................................................................................... 122 Seasonal movement and habitat use ................................................................... 123 Home range .......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Endangered Species

    Endangered Species

    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
  • Guadalupe Bass Micropterus Treculii (Vaillant & Bocourt, 1874)

    Guadalupe Bass Micropterus Treculii (Vaillant & Bocourt, 1874)

    American Fisheries Society Symposium 82:55–60, 2015 © 2015 by the American Fisheries Society Guadalupe Bass Micropterus treculii (Vaillant & Bocourt, 1874) STEPHEN G. CURTIS* Aquatic Station, Department of Biology, Texas State University 601 University Drive, San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA JOSHUAH S. PERKIN Division of Biology, Kansas State University 116 Ackert Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA PRESTON T. BEAN Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University 254 Red Raider Lane, Junction, Texas 76849, USA MARIO L. SULLIVAN AND TIMOTHY H. BONNER Aquatic Station, Department of Biology, Texas State University 601 University Drive, San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA Taxonomic Status Guadalupe Bass Micropterus treculii diverged from northeastern ancestral Micropterus (Conner and Suttkus1986) approximately 4.1–5.7 million years ago during the late Miocene or early Pliocene (Near et al. 2003, 2005). The species was originally described by Cope (1880) as the Texas (Johnson Fork of the Llano River) version of Florida Bass M. floridanus, differing slightly in some morphometric and meristic counts from its Florida counterpart. Since that time, Guadalupe Bass have undergone sev- eral redescriptions, including Dioplites treculii (Vaillant and Bocourt 1883), M. nuecensis var. treculii (Vaillant and Bocourt 1883), M. salmoides (Jordan and Gilbert 1886, Evermann and Kendall 1894), M. pseudaplites (Hubbs 1927), M. punctulatus punctulatus (Hubbs and Bailey 1940), M. p. treculii (Hubbs and Bailey 1942), M. treculi (Jurgens and Hubbs 1953; Hubbs 1954), and its current nomenclature M. treculii (Nelson et al. 2004). Johnson et al. (2001) determined that the sister taxa of Guadalupe Bass is Spotted Bass M. punctulatus based on mitochondrial DNA analyses.
  • Winter Feeding As an Overwintering Survival Strategy in Young-Of-The-Year Winter Flounder Richard J

    Winter Feeding As an Overwintering Survival Strategy in Young-Of-The-Year Winter Flounder Richard J

    This article was downloaded by: [Department Of Fisheries] On: 25 September 2012, At: 20:24 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Transactions of the American Fisheries Society Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/utaf20 Winter Feeding as an Overwintering Survival Strategy in Young-of-the-Year Winter Flounder Richard J. Bell a a Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island, 02882, USA Version of record first published: 13 Jun 2012. To cite this article: Richard J. Bell (2012): Winter Feeding as an Overwintering Survival Strategy in Young-of-the-Year Winter Flounder, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 141:4, 855-871 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2012.675896 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
  • GCP LCC Regional Hypotheses of Ecological Responses to Flow

    GCP LCC Regional Hypotheses of Ecological Responses to Flow

    Gulf Coast Prairie Landscape Conservation Cooperative Regional Hypotheses of Ecological Responses to Flow Alteration Photo credit: Brandon Brown A report by the GCP LCC Flow-Ecology Hypotheses Committee Edited by: Mary Davis, Coordinator, Southern Aquatic Resources Partnership 3563 Hamstead Ct, Durham, North Carolina 27707, email: [email protected] and Shannon K. Brewer, U.S. Geological Survey Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 007 Agriculture Hall, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078 email: [email protected] Wildlife Management Institute Grant Number GCP LCC 2012-003 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the GCP LCC Flow-Ecology Hypotheses Committee members for their time and thoughtful input into the development and testing of the regional flow-ecology hypotheses. Shannon Brewer, Jacquelyn Duke, Kimberly Elkin, Nicole Farless, Timothy Grabowski, Kevin Mayes, Robert Mollenhauer, Trevor Starks, Kevin Stubbs, Andrew Taylor, and Caryn Vaughn authored the flow-ecology hypotheses presented in this report. Daniel Fenner, Thom Hardy, David Martinez, Robby Maxwell, Bryan Piazza, and Ryan Smith provided helpful reviews and improved the quality of the report. Funding for this work was provided by the Gulf Coastal Prairie Landscape Conservation Cooperative of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and administered by the Wildlife Management Institute (Grant Number GCP LCC 2012-003). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Suggested Citation: Davis, M. M. and S. Brewer (eds.). 2014. Gulf Coast Prairie Landscape Conservation Cooperative Regional Hypotheses of Ecological Responses to Flow Alteration. A report by the GCP LCC Flow-Ecology Hypotheses Committee to the Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership (SARP) for the GCP LCC Instream Flow Project.
  • BFL - Fish Last Updated September 2020 1=Introduced Species 4=Found in Adjacent Ladybird Lake

    BFL - Fish Last Updated September 2020 1=Introduced Species 4=Found in Adjacent Ladybird Lake

    BFL - Fish last updated September 2020 1=Introduced Species 4=Found in Adjacent Ladybird Lake Catostomidae Carpiodes carpio River Carpsucker 1,4 Catostomidae Ictiobus bubalus Smallmouth Buffalo 4 Catostomidae Moxostoma congestum Gray Redhorse 1, 4 Centrarchidae Lepomis auritus Redbreast Sunfish 4 Centrarchidae Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 4 Centrarchidae Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill Centrarchidae Lepomis megalotis Longear Sunfish 4 Centrarchidae Lepomis microlophus Redear Sunfish 4 Centrarchidae Lepomis cyanellus x L. microlophus Green Redear Sunfish 4 Centrarchidae Lepomis punctatus Spotted Sunfish 4 Centrarchidae Micropterus dolomieu Smallmouth Bass 4 Centrarchidae Micropterus punctulatus Spotted Bass 4 Centrarchidae Micropterus punctulatus x M. treculii Spotted X Guadalupe Bass 4 Centrarchidae Micropterus salmoides Largemouth Bass 4 Centrarchidae Micropterus treculii Guadalupe Bass 4 Characidae Piaractus brachypomus Red Bellied Pacu 1,4 Cichlidae Herichthys cyanoguttatus Rio Grande Cichlid 1 Clupeidae Dorosoma cepedianum Gizzard Shad 4 Cyprinidae Carassius auratus Goldfish 1, 4 Cyprinidae Ctenopharyngodon idella Grass Carp 1, 4 Cyprinidae Cyprinus carpio Common Carp 1, 4 Cyprinidae Notropis venustis Blacktail Shiner Cyprinodontidae Zygonectus notatus Blackstripe Topminnow Esocidae Esox lucius Northern Pike 1,4 Ictaluridae Ameiurus natalis Yellow Bullhead 1 Ictaluridae Ictalurus furcatus Blue Catfish 1, 4 Ictaluridae Ictalurus punctatus Channel Catfish 1 Ictaluridae Pylodictis olivaris Flathead Catfish 4 Lepisosteidae Lepisosteus oculatus Spotted Gar 4 Lepisosteidae Lepisosteus osseus Longnose Gar, Needlenose Gar 4 Moronidae Morone chrysops White Bass, Sand Bass 4 Moronidae Morone chrysops x M. saxitilis Palmetto Bass 4 Moronidae Morone saxatilis Striped Bass 1,4 Percidae Sander vitreus Walleye 4 Poeciliidae Gambusia affinis Mosquitofish Poeciliidae Gambusia spp. 1 Poeciliidae Molleniesia spp. 1 Sciaenidae Aplodinotus grunniens Freshwater Drum 4 Sciaenidae Micropogonias undulates Atlantic Croaker 1,4 Sciaenidae Sciaenops ocellatus Red Drum 1,4.
  • DESCRIPTIONS, CLASSIFICATIONS, and EXPLANATIONS of PROCESSES and PATTERNS STRUCTURING and MAINTAINING INLAND FISH COMMUNITIES By

    DESCRIPTIONS, CLASSIFICATIONS, and EXPLANATIONS of PROCESSES and PATTERNS STRUCTURING and MAINTAINING INLAND FISH COMMUNITIES By

    DESCRIPTIONS, CLASSIFICATIONS, AND EXPLANATIONS OF PROCESSES AND PATTERNS STRUCTURING AND MAINTAINING INLAND FISH COMMUNITIES by Cody A. Craig, M.S. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Aquatic Resources and Integrative Biology May 2020 Committee Members: Timothy H. Bonner, Chair Noland H. Martin Chris Nice Emmanuel Frimpong Keith Gido COPYRIGHT by Cody A. Craig 2020 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Cody A. Craig, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my major advisor, Timothy H. Bonner, who has been my mentor throughout my time at Texas State University. I also thank my committee members who provided comments on my dissertation. Thank you to all of my past and present lab mates as well as undergraduates who have helped on all of my projects during my time as a masters and PhD student. This work is truly collaborative in nature and does not represent one person’s accomplishments. Lastly, to my family and friends, without you this would all be pointless.
  • Expanding the Toolbox: SNP Tools for Aquaculture and Conservation Management in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea Virginica) and the Black Basses (Micropterus Spp.)

    Expanding the Toolbox: SNP Tools for Aquaculture and Conservation Management in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea Virginica) and the Black Basses (Micropterus Spp.)

    Expanding the Toolbox: SNP Tools for Aquaculture and Conservation Management in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and the Black Basses (Micropterus spp.) by Wilawan Thongda A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 5, 2018 Key words: eastern oyster, black basses, SNP, GBS Copyright 2018 by Wilawan Thongda Approved by Eric Peatman, Chair, Associate Professor of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences William H. Daniels, Associate Professor of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences Charles Y. Chen, Professor of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences Scott McElroy, Professor of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences Abstract Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are considered as important molecular markers due to their several advantages, including their abundance, distribution in the genome, stability due to low mutation rates, ease of multiplexing, lower cost, amenability to high throughput assays, and low genotyping error rate. The rapid development of technology for SNPs has provided an efficient and cost-effective genetic marker tool for aquaculture and aquatic conservation in recent years for various purposes such as the determination of the population structure, population genomics, traceability, species identification, hybridization rates, and migratory dynamics. Here, relevant aspects of the Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and black basses (Micropterus spp.), key aquatic species in the southeastern United States, are examined. Culture of the Eastern oyster is rapidly expanding. Combined with their continuing role as an environmental sentinel species and ecological model, this trend necessitates improved molecular tools for breeding and selection, as well as population assessment and genetic conservation.

  • Drainage Basin Checklists and Dichotomous Keys for Inland Fishes of Texas

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 874: 31–45Drainage (2019) basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas 31 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.874.35618 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas Cody Andrew Craig1, Timothy Hallman Bonner1 1 Department of Biology/Aquatic Station, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA Corresponding author: Cody A. Craig ([email protected]) Academic editor: Kyle Piller | Received 22 April 2019 | Accepted 23 July 2019 | Published 2 September 2019 http://zoobank.org/B4110086-4AF6-4E76-BDAC-EA710AF766E6 Citation: Craig CA, Bonner TH (2019) Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas. ZooKeys 874: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.874.35618 Abstract Species checklists and dichotomous keys are valuable tools that provide many services for ecological stud- ies and management through tracking native and non-native species through time. We developed nine drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for 196 inland fishes of Texas, consisting of 171 native fishes and 25 non-native fishes. Our checklists were updated from previous checklists and revised using reports of new established native and non-native fishes in Texas, reports of new fish occurrences among drainages, and changes in species taxonomic nomenclature. We provided the first dichotomous keys for major drainage basins in Texas. Among the 171 native inland fishes, 6 species are considered extinct or extirpated, 13 species are listed as threatened or endangered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and 59 spe- cies are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) by the state of Texas.
  • Risk Assessment of the Alien Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus Dolomieu)

    Risk Assessment of the Alien Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus Dolomieu)

    2017 Risk assessment of the alien smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) M.E. Schiphouwer, R.P.W.H. Felix, G.A. van Duinen, L. de Hoop, P.C. de Hullu, J. Matthews, G. van der Velde & R.S.E.W. Leuven 1 Risk assessment of the alien smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) M.E. Schiphouwer, R.P.W.H. Felix, G.A. van Duinen, L. de Hoop, P.C. de Hullu, J. Matthews, G. van der Velde & R.S.E.W. Leuven 24th December 2017 Netherlands Centre of Expertise for Exotic Species (NEC-E): Bargerveen Foundation, Bureau Natuurbalans - Limes Divergens, RAVON and Radboud University (Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Department of Environmental Science) Commissioned by the Invasive Alien Species Team Office for Risk Assessment and Research Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority 2 Series of Reports Environmental Science The Reports Environmental Science are edited and published by the Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, the Netherlands (tel. secretariat: + 31 (0)24 365 32 81). Reports Environmental Science 527 Title: Risk assessment of the alien smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) Authors: M.E. Schiphouwer, R.P.W.H. Felix, G.A. van Duinen, L. de Hoop, P.C. de Hullu, J. Matthews, G. van der Velde & R.S.E.W. Leuven Cover photo: Smallmouth bass © E. Engbretson, US Fish and Wildlife Service Project management: Dr. P.C. de Hullu, Bargerveen Foundation, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, the Netherlands, e-mail: [email protected] Quality assurance: Dr.
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And

    Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And

    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
  • Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus Dolomieu) ERSS

    Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus Dolomieu) ERSS

    Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus dolomieu) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Marcus Rosten/USFWS. Public domain – Government work. 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “North America: St. Lawrence-Great Lakes system, Hudson Bay and Mississippi River basins from southern Quebec in Canada to North Dakota and south to northern Alabama and eastern Oklahoma in the USA.” “Native species ranging from Manitoba to Nova Scotia [Canada]; introduced into other provinces [Coker et al. 2001].” Status in the United States From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Widely transplanted throughout USA except in Atlantic and Gulf Slope drainages, where rare south of Virginia and east of central Texas [Page and Burr 1991].” “Imported into Hawaii in 1953 for sportfishing; became established in Nu'uanu Reservoir No.3 in 1956; presently well established in the Ho'omaluhia Reservoir, Kaukonahua Stream, Nu'uanu Stream, and Maunawili Stream on O'ahu and in various streams on the island of Kaua'I; law 1 prohibits release of this species in areas where they had not previously occurred [Yamamoto and Tagawa 2000].” According to Fuller et al. (2019), nonindigenous occurrences of Micropterus dolomieu have been reported in the following States, with range of years and hydrologic units in parentheses: Alabama (1971-2008; Black Warrior-Tombigbee, Cahaba, Coosa-Tallapoosa, Middle Coosa, Middle Tombigbee-Chickasaw, Mobile-Tombigbee, Sipsey Fork, Upper Tallapoosa)
  • The Interaction Between Water Turbidity and Visual

    The Interaction Between Water Turbidity and Visual

    THE INTERACTION BETWEEN WATER TURBIDITY AND VISUAL SENSORY SYSTEMS AND ITS IMPACT ON FRESHWATER FISHES By © Sylvia Fitzgibbon A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ocean Sciences Memorial University of Newfoundland January 2020 St John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador Abstract An aquatic ecosystem’s sensory environment has a profound influence on multiple aspects of the life cycles of its resident species, including mating cues, predation, and sensory systems. This thesis consists of laboratory studies and a meta-analysis that examines how changing aquatic sensory information, by reducing visual information through turbidity manipulation, can impact fish species. The laboratory studies focused on the consequences of changes in turbidity on the predator-prey interactions of two native Newfoundland fish species (three-spined stickleback prey, Gasterosteus aculeatus, and predatory brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis). The results illustrated that reducing visibility may give a prey species a sensory advantage over a predator, potentially influencing their dynamics. In order to understand the impacts of turbidity on a larger scale, I undertook a meta-analysis on fluctuations in fish communities in relation to shifts in turbidity due to reservoir creation. The analyses indicated that differential changes in turbidity influence the biodiversity and evenness of the visual subset of the fish community. Understanding how changes to the sensory environment can influence aquatic ecosystems is crucial when providing predictions for the potential outcomes of proposed anthropogenic activities altering water turbidity. ii Acknowledgements I thank my supervisor, Dr. Mark Abrahams, for his support, guidance, and patience in shaping the course of my research.