MULTI-WAVELENGTH STRONG LENSING STUDY of LOW REDSHIFT CLUSTER CORES By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MULTI-WAVELENGTH STRONG LENSING STUDY of LOW REDSHIFT CLUSTER CORES By MULTI-WAVELENGTH STRONG LENSING STUDY OF LOW REDSHIFT CLUSTER CORES by PAUL EDWARD MAY A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Astrophysics and Space Research Group School of Physics & Astronomy The University of Birmingham Sept 2012 Abstract This thesis covers initial work to increase the total number of galaxy clusters with strong lensing features and, therefore, lensing derived masses. These clusters also possess other multi-wavelength measurements that can be, and were, used for comparison. The work included an investigation into what additional information Dressler Shectman analysis of the incomplete redshift cluster member galaxy samples produced as a result of prioritising mask slit placement on potential strong lensing images. With the test blind on areas centred around the BCG, only a qualitative link was found, providing possible assistance with mass model parametisation. From the sample of eight clusters reduced, five had strong lensing features, of which, A 3084 had an unusual and rare lensing configuration. Analysis of A 3084 with relatively shallow survey data revealed a cluster with the largest cluster-scale halo centred on the intra-cluster gas and not the BCG: these two were offset from one another. The BCG had a compact DM halo coincident with it, yielding a high substructure fraction of fsub= 0.73 0.13 which, along with smooth X-ray surface brightness contours, bi-modal cluster ± galaxy redshift histogram and luminosity map, provided evidence that the interpretation of the cluster had suffered a cluster-cluster merger. From the redshift reduction, five new strong lensing models were produced following similar methods to the ones used for A 3084. With the addition of a cluster from Paraficz et al. (2012), this increased the initial sample size from 17 to 23, providing a 35% in- ∼ crease, with all clusters having other multi-wavelength measurements. Following previous SL literature comparisons a fit of M2D (R < 250 kpc) against TX was carried out, but large scatter was observed in this. A possible link was found between the residuals of the fit with that of the clusters’ BCG ellipticity after a cut was made of m12 1 for luminosity ≥ gap to remove potentially disturbed clusters. To my Mother and Father. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of my fellow PhD students Tim James and Victoria Hamilton-Morris for their help and company while learning the ropes. I would also like to thank the members of the Extragalactic Research Group at Birmingham and the members of the LoCuSS collaboration for their help over the years, with additional thanks to David Stops for his assistance with computing matters. I would also like to thank my parents, friends and family for their help and support all through the years. Finally thanking my supervisor, Graham Smith for his support and guidance through my PhD whilst I have been at Birmingham. STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY Both chapters 1 & 2 are based on existing work and literature and are not my own work. Reduction of HST, colour catalogues and J and K band luminosity maps (in chapter 4) were carried out by Victoria Hamilton-Morris and the X-ray reduction and analysis by Alaistair Sanderson. In chapter 3, collaboration with faint lensed object spectrum extraction and inter- pretation was provided by Johan Richard (with A 2537 & A 368 redshifts used in strong lensing model constraints derived from his work) and by Graham Smith. In chapter 5, model selection and interpretation was aided by insights from Johan Richard and Gra- ham Smith. The multiple image positions from Johan Richard for A 2537 were used in my strong lens models. Chapter 4 is based upon a paper that I have under preparation for publication, with the current list of co-authors listed at the beginning of that chapter. The chapter has also benefited from feedback from and discussion with the co-authors (as well as local astronomers). All redshifts (apart from those already mentioned) and Dressler Shectman statistics were reduced and derived by myself. All strong lensing models and their derived values and analysis were also produced by myself. This was my own work, under the supervision of Graham Smith and with aid provided by relevant colleagues in the LoCuSS collaboration and the Extragalactic Research Group based at the University of Birmingham Physics & Astronomy Department. Section 2.2.1 uses equations and information from the book titled ’Gravitational § Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro’ by Schneider, P., Kochanek, C. and Wambsganss, J. (Meylan et al., 2006). The basic equations and workings in section 2.4 & 2.4.1 were taken from “Data § § Analysis A Bayesian Tutorial” by D. S. Sivia. The basic equations and workings in this section 2.4.2 are based on “Bayesian Logical § Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences” by Phil Gregory (Gregory, 2005). Any non-original work is referenced. This work has not been previously submitted for a degree. CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 DarkMatter................................... 3 1.2 Λ-CDMCosmology............................... 7 1.3 GalaxyClusters................................. 10 1.4 ClusterObservables-Global. 15 1.4.1 Optical.................................. 15 1.4.2 X-ray .................................. 18 1.4.3 Millimetre................................ 20 1.5 ClusterObservables-Structural . 22 1.5.1 Optical.................................. 22 1.5.2 X-ray .................................. 24 1.5.3 Millimetre................................ 25 1.6 Gravitationallensing . 25 1.6.1 Microlensing............................... 26 1.6.2 WeakLensing.............................. 27 1.6.3 A Short History of Gravitational Lensing by Galaxy Clusters.... 28 1.6.4 ClusterLensing ............................. 40 1.7 LoCuSS ..................................... 42 1.8 ThesisOverview................................. 43 2 Theory 46 2.1 LensingTheory ................................. 46 2.2 StrongLensing ................................. 47 2.2.1 LensEquations ............................. 47 2.2.2 Magnification and Distortion . 55 2.2.3 ImageNumbers............................. 56 2.2.4 Critical Curves and Caustics . 57 2.2.5 Image Classification . 57 2.3 MassSheetDegeneracy............................. 59 2.4 BayesianTheory ................................ 60 2.4.1 ModelSelection............................. 61 2.4.2 Markov Chain Monte Carlo . 62 2.4.3 LensTool................................. 66 2.5 DensityProfilesofHalos ............................ 69 2.5.1 NFWMassModel ........................... 69 2.5.2 PIEMDMassModel .......................... 72 3 Optical Spectroscopy 74 3.1 SpectroscopicObservations. 75 3.1.1 ReductionMethod ........................... 75 3.1.2 GMOS.................................. 76 3.1.3 FORS2.................................. 79 3.1.4 Observations .............................. 80 3.2 RedshiftHistograms .............................. 82 3.2.1 ReflexAdditions ............................ 84 3.2.2 Velocity dispersion vs TX−ray ..................... 86 3.3 DresslerShectman ............................... 88 3.3.1 DSStatistics .............................. 89 3.4 DresslerShectmanAnalysis . 91 3.5 Comparative Observations - HST &X-ray .................. 92 3.6 DataSummary ................................. 93 3.7 Analysis&Interpretation . 94 3.7.1 Abell2813................................ 94 3.7.2 Abell2895................................ 95 3.7.3 Abell368 ................................ 95 3.7.4 Abell3084................................101 3.7.5 Abell3088................................105 3.7.6 Abell2537................................107 3.7.7 Abell3364................................107 3.7.8 RXCJ0528................................112 3.8 DynamicalComparisons . .114 3.8.1 EffectsofREFLEXadditions . .116 3.9 ChapterDiscussion ...............................118 3.10ChapterSummary ...............................121 4 Abell 3084 Strong Lensing Analysis 122 4.1 HyperbolicUmbilicCatastrophe. 122 4.2 ObservationsandAnalysis . .124 4.2.1 Hubble Space Telescope imaging ....................124 4.2.2 Ground-based near-infrared imaging . 126 4.2.3 Opticalspectroscopy . .129 4.2.4 Chandra X-rayobservations . .134 4.2.5 Summary ................................140 4.3 Strong-lensModelandResults. 141 4.3.1 ModelFitting ..............................143 4.3.2 TheMassandStructureoftheClusterCore . 149 4.4 SummaryandDiscussion. .153 4.4.1 MainResults ..............................153 4.4.2 PhysicalInterpretation . 155 4.5 Summary ....................................157 5 Strong Lensing Mass vs X-Ray Temperatures 159 5.1 StrongLensingModels .............................160 5.1.1 Abell2813................................160 5.1.2 Abell368 ................................162 5.1.3 Abell2895................................164 5.1.4 Abell2537................................167 5.1.5 Results..................................167 5.2 ExpandedSample................................167 5.3 DataSummary .................................170 5.4 Analysis .....................................170 5.4.1 MassObservables............................172 5.4.2 MassvsTemperature. .173 5.5 Residuals ....................................176 5.5.1 SubstructureFraction . .177 5.5.2 LuminosityGap.............................177 5.5.3 BCGEllipticity .............................178 5.6 ResidualDiscussion...............................180 5.7 ChapterDiscussion ...............................182 5.8 ChapterSummary ...............................183
Recommended publications
  • The Dynamical State of the Coma Cluster with XMM-Newton?
    A&A 400, 811–821 (2003) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021911 & c ESO 2003 Astrophysics The dynamical state of the Coma cluster with XMM-Newton? D. M. Neumann1,D.H.Lumb2,G.W.Pratt1, and U. G. Briel3 1 CEA/DSM/DAPNIA Saclay, Service d’Astrophysique, L’Orme des Merisiers, Bˆat. 709, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 2 Science Payloads Technology Division, Research and Science Support Dept., ESTEC, Postbus 299 Keplerlaan 1, 2200AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands 3 Max-Planck Institut f¨ur extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstr., 85740 Garching, Germany Received 19 June 2002 / Accepted 13 December 2002 Abstract. We present in this paper a substructure and spectroimaging study of the Coma cluster of galaxies based on XMM- Newton data. XMM-Newton performed a mosaic of observations of Coma to ensure a large coverage of the cluster. We add the different pointings together and fit elliptical beta-models to the data. We subtract the cluster models from the data and look for residuals, which can be interpreted as substructure. We find several significant structures: the well-known subgroup connected to NGC 4839 in the South-West of the cluster, and another substructure located between NGC 4839 and the centre of the Coma cluster. Constructing a hardness ratio image, which can be used as a temperature map, we see that in front of this new structure the temperature is significantly increased (higher or equal 10 keV). We interpret this temperature enhancement as the result of heating as this structure falls onto the Coma cluster. We furthermore reconfirm the filament-like structure South-East of the cluster centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Study of Systems of Galaxies in The
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41708749 Identification and study of systems of galaxies in the Shapley supercluster Article in Astronomy and Astrophysics · January 2006 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053623 CITATIONS READS 11 41 5 authors, including: Andreas Reisenegger Hernan Quintana Pontifical Catholic University of Chile Pontifical Catholic University of Chile 111 PUBLICATIONS 1,691 CITATIONS 226 PUBLICATIONS 5,059 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Abell and Group Galaxy Studies View project PUC Astronomy Group - Cluster of galaxies View project All content following this page was uploaded by Hernan Quintana on 20 July 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. A&A 445, 819–825 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053623 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics Identification and study of systems of galaxies in the Shapley supercluster C. J. Ragone1,2, H. Muriel1,2, D. Proust3, A. Reisenegger4, and H. Quintana4 1 Grupo de Investigaciones en Astronomía Teórica y Experimental, IATE, Observatorio Astronómico, Laprida 854, Córdoba, Argentina 2 Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina e-mail: [cin;hernan]@oac.uncor.edu 3 GEPI, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France e-mail: [email protected] 4 Departamento de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile e-mail: [areisene;hquintana]@astro.puc.cl Received 13 June 2005 / Accepted 7 September 2005 ABSTRACT Based on the largest compilation of galaxies with redshift in the region of the Shapley Supercluster (Proust et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Milkomeda's Birthday
    . o gahma-ray bursts hold secrets of the infant . ~~How,,astrono.mers? -.$ . .. : are finding out. g:& , g:& a&'" - . ' Bob Berman Master the How to create your on finding art of wide- own astronomy another Earth field imaging '..weather forecast p. 13 p. 66 - ,p. 64 > : I Ii. BILLIONS OF YEARS FROM bJW, ttp night sky will glow with stars, dust,.md psfrom two galaxies: the Milky Way, in ~Mchwe' live, and the *roaching Anqromeda Galaxy (M31). LYNE~TECOOKFOR ASTRONOMY / THE ANDROMEDA GALAXY (M31) is a typical spiral of stars, dust, and gas. Spiral galaxies the Sun's mass. It also suggests the Milky I dominate the night sky in the local universe. Fourteen satellite galaxies accompany / Andromeda, including the two visible in this image: M32 (above Andromeda) and NGC 205 Way and Andromeda \c.ill nialie a close pass : (below). Andromeda is the largest in the Local Group of galaxies. TONYANUDAPHNEHALLAS in about 4 billion years. Kahn and Woltjer inspired a generation and is visible in the northern sky with the effect. In contrast, most galaxies in the uni- of studies that further constrained the mass naked eye. The remaining members of the verse are flying away from the Milky Way. of the Local Group and revealed important Local Group - several dozen - are a bevy characteristics of Andromeda's orbit, such of much smaller satellite galaxies. Timing is everything as its total energy of motion. A galaxy group con~prisestwo or more Nearly 50 years ago, Franz Kahn and But the timing argument does not have relatively close, massive galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • Galaxies Through Cosmic Time Illuminated by Gamma-Ray Bursts and Quasars
    Galaxies through Cosmic Time Illuminated by Gamma-Ray Bursts and Quasars Kasper Elm Heintz arXiv:1910.09849v1 [astro-ph.GA] 22 Oct 2019 Faculty of Physical Sciences University of Iceland 2019 Galaxies through Cosmic Time Illuminated by Gamma-Ray Bursts and Quasars Kasper Elm Heintz Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of a Philosophiae Doctor degree in Physics PhD Committee Prof. Páll Jakobsson (supervisor) Assoc. Prof. Jesús Zavala Prof. Emeritus Einar H. Guðmundsson Opponents Prof. J. Xavier Prochaska Dr. Valentina D’Odorico Faculty of Physical Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, July 2019 Galaxies through Cosmic Time Illuminated by Gamma-Ray Bursts and Quasars Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of a Philosophiae Doctor degree in Physics Copyright © Kasper Elm Heintz 2019 All rights reserved Faculty of Physical Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Dunhagi 107, Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525-4000 Bibliographic information: Kasper Elm Heintz, 2019, Galaxies through Cosmic Time Illuminated by Gamma-Ray Bursts and Quasars, PhD disserta- tion, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University of Iceland, 71 pp. ISBN 978-9935-9473-3-8 Printing: Háskólaprent Reykjavik, Iceland, July 2019 Contents Abstract v Útdráttur vii Acknowledgments ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The nature of GRBs and quasars 1 1.1.1 GRB optical afterglows...................................2 1.1.2 Late-stage emission components associated with GRBs..............3 1.1.3 Quasar classification and selection............................4 1.1.4 GRBs and quasars as cosmic probes..........................5 1.2 Damped Lyman-α absorbers 7 1.2.1 Gas-phase abundances and kinematics........................ 10 1.2.2 The effect of dust.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groups of Galaxies in the Nearby Universe Held in Santiago De Chile, 5–9 December 2006
    Report on the Conference on Groups of Galaxies in the Nearby Universe held in Santiago de Chile, 5–9 December 2006 Ivo Saviane, Valentin D. Ivanov, Jura Borissova (ESO) n Bi r 10 For every galaxy in the field or in clusters, pe p there are about three galaxies in groups. ou Therefore, the evolution of most galax- Gr r ies actually happens in groups. The Milky pe Way resides in a group, and groups can be found at high redshift. The current xies 1 generation of 10-m-class telescopes and Gala space facilities allows us to study mem- of bers of nearby groups with exquisite de- tail, and their properties can be corre- –1 Number L < 41.7 Log (erg s ) lated with the global properties of their x L > 41.7 Log (erg s–1) host group. Finally, groups are relevant x for cosmology, since they trace large- scale structures better than clusters, and –22 –20 –18 –16 –14 Absolute Magnitude (M ) the evolution of groups and clusters may B be related. Figure 1: Cumulative B-band luminosity function of Strangely, there are three times fewer pa- 25 GEMS groups of galaxies grouped into X-ray- bright and X-ray-faint categories, fitted with one or pers on groups of galaxies than on clus- two Schechter functions, respectively (Miles et ters of galaxies, as revealed by an ADS al. 2004, MNRAS 355, 785; presented by Raychaud- search. Organising this conference was a hury). Mergers could explain the bimodality of the way to focus the attention of the com- luminosity function of X-ray-faint groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Galaxy Group and Cluster Astronomy at RIT
    Galaxy Group and Cluster Astronomy at RIT 23 Spitzer,)HST,)GALEX,)&)Chandra)Image) Green Bank 100M Hershel 3.5M Credit:)NRAO) Credit:)Chicago)University) Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Sloan Digital 2.4M Sky Survey 2.5M Credit:) Hubblesite ) In Space On Earth Astronomers at RIT want to learn about galaxy groups and clusters. They use a variety of ground- and space-based telescopes. 24 YOU ARE HERE Milky Way galaxy Artist’s representation Here’s where the sun lives! We are on the outskirts of the Milky Way. It takes the sun 200 million years to travel once around the galaxy. Credit:)NASA/JPLJCaltech/R) 25 Sometimes galaxies run past each other or even combine! ZOOM Antennae Galaxies This can jumpstart star formation and make irregularly shaped galaxies like the ones shown here. 26 Credit:)HubbleSite) Living as a group of galaxies, the Milky Way has neighbors: the larger Andromeda and the smaller Tr i a n g u l u m . The Milky Way s Home The Local Group Andromeda Galaxy This is an artist’s interpretation. NGC185 Not drawn to scale. NGC147 M32 Tr i a n g u l u m Galaxy NGC205 Pegasus Milky Way Galaxy IC1613 Draco Fornax WLM Ursa Minor Sculptor LEo I Leo II Sextans NGC6822 SMC LMC Carina Artist’s representation of the Local Group Around each larger galaxy there are dozens of dwarf galaxies. It takes light 2.5 million years to get to Earth from Andromeda. 27 Hundreds, or even thousands, of galaxies can live together in a cluster. A crowded neighborhood Abell 1689 shown here has over 2000 galaxies living far, far away from Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Collapse, Connectivity, and Galaxy Populations in Supercluster Cocoons: the Case of A2142
    COLLAPSE, CONNECTIVITY, AND GALAXY POPULATIONS IN SUPERCLUSTER COCOONS: THE CASE OF A21421 Maret Einasto Tartu Observatory, Tartu University, Observatooriumi 1, 61602 T˜oravere, Estonia Abstract The largest galaxy systems in the cosmic web are superclusters, overdensity regions of galaxies, groups, clusters, and filaments. Low-density regions around superclusters are called basins of attraction or cocoons. In my talk I discuss the properties of galaxies, groups, and filaments in the A2142 supercluster and its cocoon at redshift z ≈ 0.09. Cocoon boundaries are determined by the lowest density regions around the supercluster. We analyse the structure, dynamical state, connectivity, and galaxy content of the supercluster, and its high density core with the cluster A2142. We show that the main body of the supercluster is collapsing, and long filaments which surround the supercluster are detached from it. Galaxies with very old stellar populations lie not only in the central parts of clusters and groups in the supercluster, but also in the poorest groups in the cocoon. Keywords: galaxies: clusters: general – galaxies: groups: general – large- scale structure of Universe arXiv:2012.05843v1 [astro-ph.CO] 10 Dec 2020 1Paper presented at the Fourth Zeldovich meeting, an international conference in honor of Ya. B. Zel- dovich held in Minsk, Belarus on September 7–11, 2020. Published by the recommendation of the special editors: S. Ya. Kilin, R. Ruffini and G. V. Vereshchagin. 1 1 Introduction The large-scale distribution of galaxies can be described as the supercluster-void network or the cosmic web. The cosmic web consists of galaxies, galaxy groups, and clusters connected by filaments and separated by voids [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The AIMSS Project – I. Bridging the Star Cluster–Galaxy Divide †‡§¶
    MNRAS 443, 1151–1172 (2014) doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1186 ? The AIMSS Project – I. Bridging the star cluster–galaxy divide †‡§¶ Mark A. Norris,1,2k Sheila J. Kannappan,2 Duncan A. Forbes,3 Aaron J. Romanowsky,4,5 Jean P. Brodie,5 Favio Raul´ Faifer,6,7 Avon Huxor,8 Claudia Maraston,9 Amanda J. Moffett,2 Samantha J. Penny,10 Vincenzo Pota,3 Anal´ıa Smith-Castelli,6,7 Jay Strader,11 David Bradley,2 Kathleen D. Eckert,2 Dora Fohring,12,13 JoEllen McBride,2 David V. Stark2 and Ovidiu Vaduvescu12 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/443/2/1151/1058316 by guest on 04 September 2019 Affiliations are listed at the end of the paper Accepted 2014 June 16. Received 2014 May 13; in original form 2014 January 27 ABSTRACT We describe the structural and kinematic properties of the first compact stellar systems dis- covered by the Archive of Intermediate Mass Stellar Systems project. These spectroscopically 6 confirmed objects have sizes (∼6 < Re [pc] < 500) and masses (∼2 × 10 < M∗/M¯ < 6 × 109) spanning the range of massive globular clusters, ultracompact dwarfs (UCDs) and compact elliptical galaxies (cEs), completely filling the gap between star clusters and galax- ies. Several objects are close analogues to the prototypical cE, M32. These objects, which are more massive than previously discovered UCDs of the same size, further call into question the existence of a tight mass–size trend for compact stellar systems, while simultaneously strengthening the case for a universal ‘zone of avoidance’ for dynamically hot stellar systems in the mass–size plane.
    [Show full text]
  • ALFALFA HI OBSERVATIONS of the NGC 5846 GALAXY GROUP Ana Mikler1, Katelyn O'brien1, Sreynoch Chin1, Rebecca A
    ALFALFA HI OBSERVATIONS OF THE NGC 5846 GALAXY GROUP Ana Mikler1, Katelyn O'Brien1, SreyNoch Chin1, Rebecca A. Koopmann1,Jessica Rossenberg2, ALFALFA Team3 1Union College , 2 George Mason University, 3PI: Riccardo Giovanelli, Cornell University ABSTRACT The intermediate density NGC 5846 group of galaxies has one of the highest fractions of early-type galaxies in the local Universe. Based on Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA (ALFALFA) observations, the Union College group has shown that NGC 5846 contains few galaxies with detectable HI. We compare the gas and stellar properties of gas-poor galaxies in the group by measuring upper limits for the HI content of galaxies not detected using the ALFALFA survey, based on a list of group members constructed from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We present contour maps of HI emission in member galaxies. This project is part of the Undergraduate ALFALFA Team Groups project whose general goal is to measure and compare HI and multi-wavelength observations for groups with different properties. This work is supported by NSF grants AST-0724918 and AST-0725380. NGC 5846 GROUP OF GALAXIES HI RESULTS • HI MASS • Well-defined, relatively isolated group in Local Supercluster. • 4.8 X 8° region covering NGC5846 group center • Distance = 26.1 Mpc. All • 26 galaxies detected by ALFALFA • High density, intermediate mass system, • The HI mass in a galaxy is calculated from: Spirals > 300 members, 4 with L > L* 5 2 MHI = 2.36 x 10 D FHI Mʘ • Early- type rich population. • Velocity: 1749 km/s with a velocity dispersion of 322 km/s. where F is the corrected HI flux density integrated over HI • X-ray emission; possible intragroup medium.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2016 BRAS Newsletter
    April 2016 Issue th Next Meeting: Monday, April 11 at 7PM at HRPO (2nd Mondays, Highland Road Park Observatory) April 6th through April 10th is our annual Hodges Gardens Star Party. You can pre-register using the form on the BRAS website. If you have never attended this star party, make plans to attend this one. What's In This Issue? President’s Message Photos: BRAS Telescope donated to EBRP Library Secretary's Summary of March Meeting Recent BRAS Forum Entries 20/20 Vision Campaign Message from the HRPO Astro Short: Stellar Dinosaurs? International Astronomy Day Observing Notes: Leo The Lion, by John Nagle Newsletter of the Baton Rouge Astronomical Society April 2016 Page 2 President’s Message There were 478 people who stopped by the BRAS display at the March 19th ―Rockin at the Swamp‖ event at the Bluebonnet Swamp and Nature Center. I give thanks to all our volunteers for our success in this outreach event. April 6th through April 10th is our annual Hodges Gardens Star Party. You can pre-register on the BRAS website, or register when you arrive (directions are on the BRAS website). If you have never attended a star party, of if you are an old veteran star partier; make plans to attend this one. Our Guest Speaker for the BRAS meeting on April 11th will be Dr. Joseph Giaime, Observatory Head, LIGO Livingston (Caltech), Professor of Physics and Astronomy (LSU). Yes, he will be talking about gravity waves and the extraordinary discovery LIGO has made. We need volunteers to help at our display on Earth Day on Sunday, April 17th.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Study of Systems Of
    A&A 445, 819–825 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053623 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics Identification and study of systems of galaxies in the Shapley supercluster C. J. Ragone1,2, H. Muriel1,2, D. Proust3, A. Reisenegger4, and H. Quintana4 1 Grupo de Investigaciones en Astronomía Teórica y Experimental, IATE, Observatorio Astronómico, Laprida 854, Córdoba, Argentina 2 Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina e-mail: [cin;hernan]@oac.uncor.edu 3 GEPI, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France e-mail: [email protected] 4 Departamento de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile e-mail: [areisene;hquintana]@astro.puc.cl Received 13 June 2005 / Accepted 7 September 2005 ABSTRACT Based on the largest compilation of galaxies with redshift in the region of the Shapley Supercluster (Proust et al. 2004, P2004), we identified 122 galaxy systems, 60 of which are new systems. Using the SuperCOSMOS catalogue, we have assigned b j magnitudes to each galaxy in our 13 15 −1 compilation. The sample of galaxy systems was used to estimate the mass function of systems in the range 10 to 10 M h . We computed a lower value to the total mass in the region of the Shapley Supercluster with this mass function. Using 15 mock catalogues we derived the mean mass that these kinds of systems have before comparing it with that obtained from the real data. Key words. galaxies: clusters: general 1. Introduction representing an overdensity range ρ/ρc ∼ 3−20. In this work we explore an alternative way to estimate a lower limit to the to- The Shapley Supercluster (hereafter SSC) has the highest con- tal mass of the SSC.
    [Show full text]
  • MACHINE LEARNING in GALAXY GROUPS DETECTION By
    MACHINE LEARNING IN GALAXY GROUPS DETECTION by RAFEE TARIQ IBRAHEM A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Computer Science College of Engineering and Physical Sciences The University of Birmingham May 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The detection of galaxy groups and clusters is of great importance in the field of astrophysics. In particular astrophysicists are interested in the evolution and formation of these systems, as well as the interactions that occur within galaxy groups and clusters. In this thesis, we developed a probabilistic model capa- ble of detecting galaxy groups and clusters based on the Hough transform. We called this approach probabilistic Hough transform based on adaptive local ker- nel (PHTALK). PHTALK was tested on a 3D realistic galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA) mock data catalogue (at close redshift z < 0:1)(mock data: contains information related to galaxies’ position, redshift and other properties). We com- pared the performance of our PHTALK method with the performance of two ver- sions of the standard friends-of-friends (FoF) method.
    [Show full text]