DOCSLIB.ORG

Software by Bridge Base Online Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Software by Bridge Base Online Ltd 10/18/2018 BBO ACBL Convention Card - Amy & Paul's Convention Card SPECIAL DOUBLES NOTRUMP OVERCALLS Amy Casanova/Paul NAMES After Overcall: Penalty Direct: 14 to 18 Systems on Wrigley Negative thru4D Conv. GENERAL APPROACH Responsive: thru2S Maximal Balance: 10 to 14 Precision Club Support: Dbl thru2S Rdbl Jump to 2NT: Minors 2 Lowest Two Over One: Game Forcing Game Forcing Except When Suit Rebid Card-showing Min. Offshape T/O Conv.14-17 NV, 15-18 V VERY LIGHT: Openings 3rd Hand Overcalls Preempts 2C-2Suit-DblT/O 2C-3Suit-Dbl:Pen DEFENSE VS NOTRUMP FORCING OPENING: 1♣ 2♣ Natural 2 Bids Other SIMPLE OVERCALL vs: ALL 1-level 8 to 16 HCP (usually) 2♣ diamonds or major/minor NOTRUMP OPENING BIDS Often 4 cards Very light style 2♦ majors 1NT 3♣ to play 2NT 22 to 23 Responses 2♥ hearts 11 to 13 3♦ to play Puppet Stayman New Suit: Forcing NFConst NF spades 2♠ 12 to 14 3♥ GF 5+hearts Transfer Responses: Jump Raise: Forcing Inv. Weak Dbl penalty 5-Card Major Common Jacoby Texas JS - Fit show, JC - Mixed Raise Other: 2NT=minors, 3C = clubs 3♠ GF 5+spades JUMP OVERCALL System On Overx, 2C 3♠ Minor Suit Hand Strong Intermediate Weak OVER OPP'S T/O DOUBLE 2♣ Stayman Puppet New Suit Forcing: 1-level 2-level 2♦ Transfer to ♥ 4♦, 4♥ Transfer 3NT 07 to 812 Forcing Stayman Smolen 6/5 minors OPENING PREEMPTS Redouble implies no fit Sound Light Very Light 2NT Over Limit + Limit Weak 2♥ Transfer to ♠ Lebensohl ( fast denies) Conventional NT Openings 3/4-bids Majors 2♠ to play Negative Double 2 L 4NT - Specific Ace Ask Conv./Resp. Minors 2NT12-13 xx=roll out DIRECT CUEBID Other: JS weak 1D, fit 1H/1S MAJOR OPENING MINOR OPENING Over: Minor Major VS OPENING PREEMPT DOUBLE IS Expected Min. Length 4 5 Expected Min. Length 4 3 NF 0-2 Conv. Natural Takeout thru4H Penalty 1st/2nd 1♣ Strong T/O Conv. Takeout: 3rd/4th 1♦ Michaels Lebensohl 2NT Response Other: leaping michaels RESPONSES RESPONSES Double Raise: Force Inv. Weak Double Raise: Force Inv. Weak SLAM CONVENTIONS Gerber 4NT: Blackwood RKC 1430 After Overcall: Force Inv. Weak After Overcall: Force Inv. Weak 5NT asks specific kings, Minorwood Conv. Raise: 2NT 3NT Splinter Forcing Raise: J/S in other minor vs. Interference: DOPI DEPO Level: ROPI Other: 1NT semi-forc 3/4 pos Single raise Other: LEADS (click card led, if not in bold) DEFENSIVE CARDING 1NT: Forcing Semi-forcing Frequently bypass 4+♦ versus Suits versus Notrump vs Suits vs NT 2NT: Forcing Inv. to 1NT/1♣:8 to10 x x x x x x x x x x x x Standard: 3NT:13 to15 2NT: Forcing Inv. 11 to13 Except x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Drury : Reverse 2-Way Fit 3NT: to A K x 10 9 x A K J x A Q J x K Q x K J 10 x A J 10 9 A 10 9 8 Upside-Down Count Other: kokish/ssgt Other: Q J x K 10 9 x K Q J x K Q 10 9 Upside-Down Attitude DESCRIBE RESPONSES/REBIDS J 10 x Q 10 9 x Q J 10 x Q 10 9 8 FIRST DISCARD 2♣ 11 to 15 HCP at least 5 clubs, may have 2D asks to describe K Q 10 9 J 10 9 x 10 9 8 x Lavinthal Strong Other 4 card major shape/strength Length Leads: Odd/Even 2♦ Response: Neg Waiting 4th Best vs Suits vs NT upside down 2♦ 11 to 15 HCP 4414 or 4405 2NT ask shape/strength 3rd/5th vs Suits vs NT OTHER CARDING Best Smith Echo Natural: Weak Intermediate Strong Conv 2NT Force New Suit NF Attitude vs NT Trump Suit Pref. 2♥ 5 to 10 HCP 10 - 14 (4th position) Primary signal to partner's leads Foster Echo Natural: Weak Intermediate Strong Conv 2NT Force New Suit NF Attitude Count Suit Preference 2♠ 5 to 10 HCP 10 - 14 (4th position) Natural: Weak Intermediate Strong Conv 2NT Force New Suit NF SPECIAL CARDING PLEASE ASK OTHER CONV CALLS: New Minor Forcing 2-Way NMF Weak jump shifts: In Comp. Not In Comp. Unusual vs Unusual 4th Suit Forcing: 1 Round To Game Jump Q=mixed raise Software by Bridge Base Online Ltd. - www.bridgebase.com Defense to Strong Club, Dbl/1S/!NT = RCO Two Suiter, 1D/1H = Tran 2 Suit = Natural or Short, Defense to strong 2C similar https://webutil.bridgebase.com/v2/acblcc/acblCC.html?x=656469743d6e266b65793d4143424c2f4e2f637269636b657437352f313437363035323234335f313139315f706d777269676c65792f313437363… 1/1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 27, 2010 Volume 83, Number 2 Daily Bulletin
    Saturday, November 27, 2010 Volume 83, Number 2 Daily Bulletin 83rd North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Dave Smith Thomas McAdoo Married couple take Non-LM Pairs Dianne and Roger Pryor of Madeira Smith Beach FL had two solid games to win 1938–2010 the Manfield Non-Life Master Pairs. The Tom Smith, married couple scored 58.25% and 57.04% one of the five for a combined 57.80%. In second place original “Precision were Ryan Miller, Tampa FL; Brandon Team” members Harper, Winter Park FL with 55.46%. that dominated The winners play a weak 1NT (11—14 North American high-card points) and attribute some of contests in the early their good board to their system. Seventies, died Nov. The Pryors have played together 15 in his hometown for about 30 years. Dianne, a retired of Bennington VT. homemaker, has about 100 masterpoints. As well as being Roger, a retired engineer with Bell South a top level player International, has almost 400 masterpoints. and teacher, Smith Dianne credits Roger with teaching her was a publisher, how to play. journalist, editor and club manager. The second-place pair, Miller and Roger and Dianne Pryor are winners of the Manfield Smith won the Spingold Knockout Teams in Harper, are high school students. Non-Life Master Pairs. 1970 and 1971 and Vanderbilt Knockout Teams in 1972 playing with a rotating cast of teammates that included Steve Altman, Eugene Neiger, Finals today in Open Thirty-two teams continued on page 5 and Women’s Pairs left in Baze Champions will be crowned tonight in the Nail Fung hopes Life Master Open Pairs and the Smith Life Master Senior KO Women’s Pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Updated July 2020 Changes from Last Version Highlighted in Yellow Author Title Date Edition Cover Sgnd Comments
    Last updated July 2020 Changes from last version highlighted in yellow Author Title Date Edition Cover Sgnd Comments ANON THE LAWS OF ROYAL AUCTION BRIDGE 1914 1st Card Small, stitched booklet with red covers ABERN Wendell & FIELDER Jarvis BRIDGE IS A CONTACT SPORT 1995 1st Card ABRAHAMS Gerald BRAINS IN BRIDGE 1962 1st No DW Ditto 1962 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library "A C B" AUCTION BRIDGE FOR BEGINNERS AND OTHERS 1929 Rev ed No DW ACKERSLEY Chris THE BRIDGING OF TROY 1986 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ADAMS J R DEFENCE AT AUCTION BRIDGE 1930 1st No DW AINGER Simon SIMPLE CONVENTIONS FOR THE ACOL SYSTEM 1995 1st Card ALBARRAN Pierre & JAIS Pierre HOW TO WIN AT RUBBER BRIDGE 1961 1st UK No DW Ditto 1961 1st UK DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ALDER Philip YOU CAN PLAY BRIDGE 1983 1st Card 1st was hb ALLEN David THE PHONEY CLUB The Cleveland Club System 1992 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library Ditto 1992 1st DW AMSBURY Joe BRIDGE: BIDDING NATURALLY 1979 1st DW Ditto 1979 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ANDERTON Philip BRIDGE IN 20 LESSONS 1961 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library Ditto 1961 1st DW PLAY BRIDGE 1967 1st DW Ditto 1967 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ARKELL Reginald BRIDGE WITHOUT SIGHS 1934 2nd No DW Ditto 1934 2nd No dw ARMSTRONG, Len The Final Deal 1995 1st Paper AUHAGEN Ulrich DAS GROBE BUCH VOM BRIDGE 1973 1st DW Ex-Rixi Markus Library with compliment slip "BADSWORTH" BADSWORTH ON BRIDGE 1903 1st Boards Ex-G C H Fox Library aeg BADSWORTH ON BRIDGE 1903 1st Boards Aeg; IN PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE AUCTION BRIDGE AND ROYAL AUCTION 1913 2nd Boards BAILEY Alan ABRIDGED
    [Show full text]
  • Defensive Bidding Over Multi-Way Club and Strong Club Openings
    Defensive bidding over multi-way club and strong club openings General Approach There are a variety of systems including short club, Polish Club, and Carrot Club, Blue Club, Precision Club, Meckwell that basically use a one club opening bid to be a combination of a natural suit, a weak no trump, or any strong hand. The first group I call multi-way club systems, where the opening one club bid can have a hand like a weak no trump. They may also contain any strong hand, but this option is far less likely than a weak no trump. Sometimes they are forcing (Polish Club), sometimes not (short club). The second group is the strong club systems, where the opening one club bid is always strong and shows any hand that has 16+ points. The opening bid is completely artificial. Defensive bidding over multi-way club systems I propose a simple defence to these systems - treat them like a natural 1♣ opener. If you overcall, the advancer can bid clubs as a cue bid. Do not be afraid to make an offshape takeout double when you have at least 4-3 in the major suits and values for a ‘normal’ takeout double. The only changes I would make is to permit a 2♣ overcall to be natural and a 3♣ overcall to be a weak jump overcall. Of course, if 2♣ is natural then you lose your Michaels Cue Bid, so I recommend that you use 2♦ as the Michaels Cue Bid over both minor suit openings. Personally I ​ ​ do this over all 1♣ openings, even when they play Acol.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Teams Are In
    WuhanWuhan China 14-28 September 2019 DAILY BULLETIN Editor: Brent Manley • Journalists: David Bird, Jos Jacobs, Brian Senior, Marc Smith, Ron Tacchi • Lay-out Editor: Monika Kümmel • Photos: Francesca Canali Issue No. 8 Sunday, 22nd September 2019 FOUR TEAMS ARE IN The Italian ‐ Chinese Duplication team: Zhou Hongxia, Fan Zhechen, Franco Crosta, Liu Chunlin, Yang Ying, Monica Gorreri, Xu Wenxia, Yu Mingrong They work hard behind closed doors to prepare your deals and make sure they are well secured until they get to your table. During the two weeks of the Championships, approximately 60,000 deals will be needed. When you are No. 1 in a competitive endeavor, it’s not unusual for every opponent Today’s Programme to come at you extra hard. The veteran Nick Nickell team — USA 1 in the Bermuda Bowl — know what that’s like as one opponent after another views a match against Bermuda Bowl, Venice Cup, them as a chance for fame and maybe a championship. The Nickell team’s d'Orsi Trophy, Mixed impressive record in high-level bridge competition indicates they know how to 10.00 - 12.20 handle these situations. That’s not to say, however, that the team is unbeatable — 13.30 - 15.50 just nearly so. On Saturday in Wuhan, USA 1 suffered two defeats, one of them by the surprising score of 54-3 at the hands of the strong team from Norway. That disappointment 10.00 Round 22 BB China - England VG/BBO1 was followed by a narrow loss to Israel, who moved from ninth to seventh.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kibitzer April 2020
    The Kibitzer April 2020 Editors: Judith and Nicholas Gartaganis President's Message I am pleased to report that our fourth 299er Sectional on Our bridge community is very fortunate to have an incredible November 9, 2019 was a great success with 38 tables playing group of volunteers working as executives and associates of during the morning session and 25½ tables during the the Unit Board, to maintain the unit website, to send out afternoon session. Thanks to Susan Korba for coordinating notices of unit and club events, to run our tournaments and this event, to Directors Murray and Marilyn Haggins, and to special events, to purchase and maintain a large amount of Clarende Duby for conducting the Supervised Bid and Play. equipment and supplies, and to supervise the mentorship program. The New Year’s Sectional at our new venue at Mount Royal University was a great start to 2020 and had a turnout of 344 tables. We were and are confident in our choice of venue and [President's Message continued next page] we will now have sufficient space for our growing membership. Based on the comments from participants and the subsequently received e-mails, this year’s Rookie-Master event was a great success and was made possible with the Inside This Issue… help of many enthusiastic and dedicated volunteers. The March 7 event was coordinated by Marvis Olson and Delores Two Rueful Rabbits - A True Story From 25 Years Ago ..... 2 Hedley and featured the introduction of Bracketed Swiss Bad Robot ......................................................................... 3 Teams. All 28 teams played the same pre-dealt boards with District GNTs Postponed ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Slam Bidding Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    UNDERSTANDING SLAM BIDDING PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Ron Klinger,Andrew Kambites | 128 pages | 13 Nov 2003 | Orion Publishing Co | 9780304366156 | English | London, United Kingdom Understanding Slam Bidding PDF Book Think of a control this way: "If we have a control, the opponents can not take the first 2 tricks in that suit. Sufficient Strength. More reader stories Hide reader stories. Bidding and making a small slam 12 tricks or grand slam 13 tricks yields high bonuses ranging from to points. Bidding is done at the beginning of a round, and it consists of a number and a suit. The convention is rarely used today. You know that the opponents cannot cash 2 club tricks. So the logical approach to slam bidding is: - the partnership finds a fit or possibly no-trumps if there is no fit - one player realises that the total strength of the combined hands is in the slam region - check the necessary first round controls aces - check the necessary second round controls kings if interested in a grand slam. To bid in a controlled auction to a successful slam is one of the great pleasures of bridge. The card you choose will also help you to signal to your partner which card is your strongest suit, so choose wisely. Main article: Cue bid. Asking bids were devised by Alan Moorehead and developed by Ely Culbertson [1] and are an alternative to cuebids. Main article: Grand slam force. Once a trump suit has been agreed and the two hands are considered to be strong enough, partners bid the lowest available suit which they control; this process continues until one of the partners has sufficient information to make the contract decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Precision Club Bidding System and the Basics of the System
    Reasons to Play the Precision Club Bidding System and the Basics of the System Copyright © 2008 by O. K. Johnson, all rights reserved The Precision Club bidding system was invented in the 1960s by C. C. Wei of Taiwan. The original objective of the system was to help the Taiwanese national team compete against expert bridge players from around the world. The system exceeded beyond everyone's expectations when the Taiwanese team scored success after success against many of the world's top tournament bridge players! Why Play Precision Club? • Better communication with your partner . Precision Club is a system designed to help bridge partners better describe their hands to one another. This helps to reduce the ambiguity that you find with the bids in many popular bidding systems. And, it helps you easily determine whether you should bid a game, a slam, or be satisfied with a part score. • Easily understandable bids . As its name implies, the Precision Club system assigns very precise meanings to the bids you make. Most of the system's bids have a specific point count range and also provide information about your hand's distribution. • Advantage over opponents . Most of today's tournament bridge players in the U.S. have adopted the two over one system of bidding. Many British players have adopted the ACOL system of bidding. Precision Club bidding is sufficiently different from these systems that it actually gives you an advantage over opponents who do not take the time to understand the meaning behind your bids.i My wife and I have played the Precision Club system for over 30 years because we were continually misunderstanding one another's bids in the systems we originally played.
    [Show full text]
  • Kendenup Bridge Club
    O Volume 12 O Issue 02 O March O 2012 Pictured here are Mayor Russell Aubrey shaking hands Past and present members have worked with Club President Danny Mistry, with (from left to tirelessly to develop and improve the right) Club Secretary Lyndie Trevean, Vice President club. These awards are a great thrill and Dorothy Stevenson and Gold Life Member Mary Firth honour for all concerned. On Australia Day, it was with much pride that our club’s As our President said, “Belonging to a President Danny Mistry accepted on behalf of The City bridge club, and particularly our club, of Melville Bridge Club Inc, not one but, two awards at is so much more than just playing the City of Melville’s Australia Day Awards Ceremony: cards. While bridge remains our main The City of Melville Australia Day Award focus, companionship and a strong Community Group of the Year in recognition of sense of community are also important our club’s “outstanding contribution to the City of aspects. We know we are a great club, Melville”; and however, it is most heartening to be The Premier’s Australia Day Award, in recognition of our club “fostering Australian pride recognised at such a high level.” and spirit through active citizenship and outstanding contribution to the community”. Western Seniors Pairs This is a Gold Point and Senior PQP Event 19th & 20th May 2012 This prestige event in the West Australian Bridge Calendar will be held at WA Bridge Club, 7 Odern Crescent, Swanbourne Plenty of Car Parking is Available. Play Starts at 10am each day.
    [Show full text]
  • 8695.5 Tables
    Saturday, March 17, 2007 Volume 50, Number 9 Daily Bulletin 50th Spring North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Dave Smith Defenses to 1NT Brogeland, Del Monte New partners take Ask a group of capture IMP Pairs Women’s Pairs experts about their favorite methods of Irina Ladyzhensky and Kamla Chawla, who competing when an had never played in person before the Whitehead opponent opens a Women’s Pairs, parlayed a 65% game in the first strong 1NT (15— final session to victory in the event. It was the first 17), and you will North American championship for each. receive a variety of They finished just ahead of Valerie Westheimer answers. The Daily and Migry Zur-Campanile. Bulletin has featured Ladyzhensky is a math teacher in Ellenton FL, one method each day Continued on page 7 during the NABC. Boye Brogeland and Ishmael Delmonte. Note: Players should be aware that several of Boye Brogeland and Ishmael Delmonte, who the systems described in this series use Mid-Chart play together only at NABCs, are used to leading conventions and are not permited in events that in the late stages of ACBL pairs events, but until are restricted to the General Convention Chart. Friday they had not had the experience of The director in charge can provide the information winning. you need. That changed when they had a monster first Today’s expert is Jerry Helms from Charlotte final session in the Lebhar IMP Pairs and won the NC. event going away, more than 17 IMPs ahead of the Helms, like many top players, loves to runners-up, Jonathan Weinstein of Evanston IL compete over the opponents’ opening 1NT.
    [Show full text]
  • A Special Thank You
    Sunday, February 3, 2002 Editors: Eric Kokish Bulletin Number 7 Richard Colker Ota-Ito Win Asuka Cup Top 10 Rankings Rank Score Names 1 2414.00 Hiroko Ota - Koji Ito 2 2362.00 Subhashi Gupta - R. Venkatraman 3 2360.50 Tadashi Imakura - kazuhiko Yamada 4 2353.00 Masayasu Oga - Tom Cheng 5 2328.50 Bruce Neill - John Roberts 6 2308.00 Shunsuke Morimura - Tadashi Teramoto 7 2302.00 Michiko Iwahashi - Misuzu Ichihashi 8 2285.00 Peter Fredin - Magnus Lindkvist 9 2279.00 Piotr Gawrys - Makoto Hirata 10 2272.50 Yukiko Umezu - Etsuko Naito Asuka Cup Winners Asuka Cup 2nd Place Asuka Cup 3rd Place Hiroko Ota-Koji Ito Subhash Gupta-B. Satyanarain Tadashi Imakura-Kazuhiko Yamada A Special Thank You To the treasured patrons of the 2002 NEC Bridge Festival JAPAN Beverage Kihachi and Es Company Kobe Bay Sheraton Hotel and Towers Royal Park Hotel Domo Arigato On behalf of all the participants, we would like to congratulate NEC for once again joining with JCBL to sponsor a bridge event which continues to grow in quality and competitiveness. It is a sign of this growth that it is now regularly attracting some of the best players in the world. Many have expressed praise for this tournament to us, saying that it has been one of their best bridge experiences. Kudos to the sponsors and especially the JCBL staff. Yokohama, and especially the Pacifico, have grown to be wonderful places. The weather was dry and pleasant this year while the people were warm and friendly as always. It is our continuing great pleasure to be reunited each year with our many friends and to share once again the happy times, fun and excitement of this tournament.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Commonly Used Conventions
    1 Commonly Used Conventions Bergen Raises This is a scheme of major-suit raises designed to get the partnership quickly to the three level or higher whenever there are nine or more combined trumps. It was developed by Marty Bergen, a well-known expert, based on Marty’s experiences in partnership with Larry Cohen — which also resulted in Larry’s books on The Law of Total Tricks. The most common variation of Bergen raises in response to an opening bid of 1 or 1 is the following: Bergen Raises • A raise of opener’s suit to the two level shows 6 to 9 points and precisely three-card support. • A raise of opener’s suit to the three level is weak — preemptive — showing 0 to 6 points and four-card or longer support. • A jump to 3 is artificial (conventional) and shows four-card or longer support with 7 to 10 points. • A jump to 3 is artificial (conventional) and shows four-card or longer support with 11 or 12 points — a limit raise. • A jump to the three level in the other major is artificial (con- ventional) and shows a game-forcing raise with shortness — a singleton or a void — in one of the side suits. Opener may ask where the shortness is by making the next cheapest bid. • A jump to 3NT shows a balanced hand with precisely three- card support, game-going strength, and stoppers in all of the unbid suits. Opener may pass, bid the major suit to game, or look for slam. For example, consider the following hands for South after the auc- tion has started: WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH 1 Pass ? 2 Commonly Used Conventions K J 7 3 Jump to 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Bidding - Standard American Yellow Card
    Bridge Bidding - Standard American Yellow Card Nicolae Sfetcu Published by Nicolae Sfetcu Second Edition Copyright 2014 Nicolae Sfetcu PREVIEW Contract Bridge Game type: trick-taking game Players: 4 Skills required: Memory, tactics, probability, communication Cards: 52 Deck: French Play: Clockwise Card rank: (highest to lowest) A K Q J 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Playing time: WBF tournament games = 7.5 minutes per deal Random chance: Low to moderate depending on variant played Related games: Whist, Auction bridge Contract bridge, usually known simply as bridge, is a trick-taking card game using a standard deck of 52 playing cards played by four players in two competing partnerships with partners sitting opposite each other around a small table. For purposes of scoring and reference, each player is identified by one of the points of the compass and thus North and South play against East and West. The game consists of several deals each progressing through four phases: dealing the cards, the auction (also referred to as bidding), playing the hand, and scoring the results. Dealing the cards and scoring the results are procedural activities while the auction and playing the hand are the two actively competitive phases of the game. Dealing: Partnerships are self-determined or by a cut of the cards, the two highest cut playing against the two lowest; the first dealer is the player cutting the highest card. Cards are dealt clockwise, one at a time and face down starting on the dealer's left so that each player receives thirteen cards. In duplicate bridge the dealer is predetermined by the board; the board also contains the four hands which have been dealt and placed in the board prior to commencement of the game.
    [Show full text]